Aug 30, 2011 ... Presentation to ITRE Committee. European ... In the supply chain of KETs,
advanced manufacturing systems are important to produce high ...
High Level Group on Key Enabling Technologies Gabriel M. Crean, VP CEA Technologies
Presentation to ITRE Committee European Parliament Brussels, 30th of August 2011
Máire Geoghegan‐Quinn Commissioner (Abs. in picture below)
Outline Part 1 KETS ?
Part 2 KETs global playing field
1.1 - Importance of KETs to address European societal challenges 1.2 - KETs underpin significant value chains 2.1 – KETs SWOT analysis 2.2 - KETs manufacturing initiative in US 2.3 – Analysis of public supporting measures to RDI (in third countries)
Part 3 HLG recommendations
2.4 - Balance between basic and applied research
3.1 - A single and fully-fledged KETs innovation policy at EU Level to pass across the ‘valley of death’ 3.2 - A comprehensive strategic approach to a KETs policy at EU level
Part 4
3.3 - Combined financing to promote RDI investments in KETS
How can ITRE Committee assist
KET’s perimeter The High Level Group focused on the following six KETs : The European Commission communication 2009 defined the initial KET’s perimeter:
Biotechnology Biotechnology
Micro and and Micro nanoelectronics nanoelectronics
NanoNanotechnologIes technologIes
Based on current global research and market trends the following could be regarded as the most strategically relevant KETs, given their economic potential, contribution to solving societal challenges and knowledge intensity :
Advanced Advanced materials materials
Photonics Photonics
Nanotechnology holds the promise of leading to the development of smart nano and micro devices and systems and to radical breakthroughs in vital fields such as healthcare, energy, environment and manufacturing; Micro- and nanoelectronics, including semiconductors, are essential for all goods and services which need intelligent control in sectors as diverse as automotive and transportation, aeronautics and space…. Photonics is a multidisciplinary domain dealing with light, encompassing its generation,detection and management. … Advanced materials offer major improvements in a wide variety of different fields, e.g. in aerospace, transport, building and health care.
Advanced Advanced manufacturing manufacturing systems systems
Biotechnology brings cleaner and sustainable process alternatives for industrial and agri-food operations. For instance, CCS and CO2-related transport grids will be needed to reduce CO2 emission in countries that will continue to rely heavily on fossil energy sources.
The HLG KET mid-term report was validated by HLG Members and In the supply chain of KETs, advanced manufacturing systems are important to Commissioners Tajani, Kroes and produce high value marketable knowledge-based goods and the related services . Geoghegan-Quinn on the 9th of February 2011
3
KETs are essential to develop and manufacture advanced products Advanced materials
substrate
Societal Challenge
Microelectronics Chip
Nanotechnologies
Mems
Digital Society
Photonics Camera
Biotechnologies
Next ?
KETs are essential to develop and manufacture advanced products Advanced materials
Nanolabels
Societal Challenge Microelectronics
Biochip
Nanotechnologies
Fluidics
Effective timely detection and diagnostic systems
Photonics Optical detection
Biotechnologies DNA
KETs are essential to develop and manufacture advanced products Advanced materials
Societal Challenge
Organic product
Microelectronics
Smart meter for utility energy consumption
Nanotechnologies Si Nanowire
Combating climate change
Photonics PV modules
Biotechnologies
KETs are essential to develop and manufacture advanced products Micro & Nano electronics
Energy
Green Car Value Chain Case Study De-carbonisation of transport
Biotechnologies
Nanotechnologies
Advanced Advanced Manufacturing Advanced materials materials Systems
Photonics
Green Car Value Chain Case Study (2/2) Zoom on KETs Material
Component
System Cells & Modules
Battery
Solution Electrical Vehicle
Soc.issu e
Recyclin g
Mobility Energy Efficiency
BMS1
Non-KET domain
Bio Tires Software
Lamp
Advanced Manuf. systems Nanotechnologies Micro- and Nanoelectronic s
High-tech Mechanosynthe -sis equipment2
Anhydrous envir. + Clean Room Facilities
Characterization
Hybrid nanomaterials
Si SOI
Chips
Sensors
Biotechnology
Biomass
Bio isoprene
Bio based synthesis rubber, elastomers
Photonics
GaN
MOCVD3 reactor
LED
Advanced Materials
Product
Electrodes Material (Nanostructured Multimaterials)
Clean Room Facilities
Nano-Coating
Powder Ink
1. Battery Management System 2. Inert atmosphere Source: HLG documents of phase 1, Expert interviews, own analysis
Characterization
Material separation 3. Metal-Organic Chemical Vapour Deposition
KETs are strategic all along EU value chains Car industry Lighting
From product to societal challenge
From KETs to final product
Material Equipment Component Product Solutions & services Societal challenges
Biomass
GaN
Nanoelectronics
SOI material
Biolsoprene MOCVD reactor Litho scanner Biobased Synthesis rubber, LED Adhesives, elastomers
Car tyres
Lamp
Biobased tyres Lighting
Nano component (Low power)
KETs: -Advanced materials -Nanotechnologies -Biotechnologies KETs: -Advanced manufac turing Systems -Biotechnology KETs: -Nanoelectronics -Photonics
Mobile phone
Nomadic communication
Energy CO2 reduction Knowledge efficiency Energy efficiency society (Climate change) (Climate change)
9
Outline Part 1 KETS ?
Part 2 KETs global playing field
1.1 - Importance of KETs to address European societal challenges 1.2 - KETs underpin significant value chains 2.1 – KETs SWOT analysis 2.2 - KETs manufacturing initiative in US 2.3 – Analysis of public supporting measures to RDI (in third countries)
Part 3 HLG recommendations
2.4 - Balance between basic and applied research
3.1 - A single and fully-fledged KETs innovation policy at EU Level to pass across the ‘valley of death’ 3.2 - A comprehensive strategic approach to a KETs policy at EU level
Part 4
3.3 - Combined financing to promote RDI investments in KETS
How can ITRE Committee assist
Concerning patent activity Europe is still in the KET’s race
2008 Shares of EPO/PCT patents by regions (percent) All KETs cumulated 45% 40%
East Asia
35% Europe
30% North America
25% 20% 15% 10%
2008 priority patents (published)
5% RoW
0% '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 11 Source: European Competitiveness Report 2010, European Competitiveness in Key Enabling Technologies (TNO/ZEW), TKM 2011
EU actors at top of KET patent1 ranking Global TOP10 per KET NanoNanotechnologIes technologIes
Micro Micro and and nanoelectronics nanoelectronics
R&D actors
CEA Univ. of California JSTA CNRS MIT US DoE AIST NI of Health Univ. Texas FhG
CEA Univ. of California IMEC FhG AIST CNRS MIT JSTA IKETR Univ. Tohoku
CEA FhG MIT Univ. of California US DoE CNRS AIST JSTA US gvmt. ETRI
All actors
Samsung HP Univ. of California Canon 3M Agilent JSTA Hitachi Sony Matsushita
Infineon Tokyo Electron Matsushita Samsung Applied Materials Fujitsu Nikon ST Microelctronics NEC IBM
Samsung Matsushita 3M Corning Fuji Film Osram Sumitomo Sharp Kodak Sony
1. EPO/PCT patents, 2000-2007 Source: European Competitiveness Report 2010, European Competitiveness in Key Enabling Technologies (TNO/ZEW), TKM 2011
Photonics Photonics
Disconnect between EU patent base and EU manufacturing share
Examples from three dedicated KETs case-studies
1 - Lithium-ion batteries for low-carbon electric vehicle 2 - Bioethanol production 3 - PV cells for solar renewable energy
13
Disconnection between patents share and manufacturing share Case Study: Li-ion battery production % %
Li-ion battery cell production share in 2008 Advanced Material Patent Share
Asia Europe 0%
USA 1%
87% 31%
30% 35%
12%
Others 4% Source: European Competitiveness Report 2010, European Competitiveness in Key Enabling Technologies (TNO/ZEW), CGGC, Lithium-ion Batteries for Electric Vehicles : THE U.S. VALUE CHAIN, October 2010
14
Electric Vehicles: a worldwide race Is Europe running ? U.S.
EU
ASIA
EC: 100M€ (EV+HEV)
> 9.2B€
FR: 545M€ (EV+HEV) ~ 2.5B€ batteries
D: 770 M€ (EV+HEV)
> 3.3 B€ ~ 1,48b€ 1,48b€ batteries
> 1.2 B€ JP: 2.15B€ (Batteries) KR: 460M€ (EV + HEV)
ARRA1: 1.855B€ (EV including 1,16b€ Batteries) CH: > 700M€ (EV + HEV) ATVMIP 2 :
6.57B€ (EV+HEV)
Michigan: 260M€ (Industrialisation of batteries) Prog DOE: 484M€ (including 58,5M€ Batteries) 1 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act 2 Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Incentive Program
Source:
15
“The Rules have Changed” Barack H. Obama, State of The Union 2011 speech, Jan 25
“At stake [right now] is whether new jobs and industries take root in this country, or somewhere else. […] The rules have changed. In a single generation, revolutions in technology have transformed the way we live, work and do business. […] Meanwhile, nations like China and India realized that with some changes of their own, they could compete in this new world. And so they started educating their children earlier and longer, with greater emphasis on math and science. They're investing in research and new technologies. Just recently, China became the home to the world's largest private solar research facility, and the world's fastest computer. The future is ours to win. But to get there, we can't just stand still.[…] We know what it takes to compete for the jobs and industries of our time. We
need to out-innovate, out-educate, and out-build the rest of the world. All these investments -- in innovation, education, and infrastructure -- will make America a better place to do business and create jobs. The first step in winning the future is encouraging American innovation. […] In America, innovation doesn't just change our lives. It is how we make our living. […] This
is our generation's Sputnik moment.
[…] We'll invest in biomedical research, information technology, and especially clean energy
technology an investment that will strengthen our security, protect our planet, and create
countless new
jobs for our people.” John Seely Brown, former director of Xerox’s Silicon Valley research center, co-chair of the Deloitte Center for Edge Innovation (Financial Times, Jan 28, 2011)
“We really have to get back to building things, we can’t just design things. […] The president’s emphasis on the need to improve the nation’s infrastructure, alongside spending on basic research and improvements in education, could pay dividends in the long term. ”
Andrew Grove's proposal to rebuild America's economy Founder and former chairman and CEO of Intel Corp. “The United States must restructure its government around the idea of attracting foreign
manufacturers to America in order to put Americans back to work […], National manufacturing 16 ecosystems compete with each other"
Aggressive US federal and state action to attract foreign firms 2005 BASF invests significantly in lithium-ion cathode materials research and development 2010 BASF breaks ground for North America's most advanced production facility for Lithium-Ion battery materials in OHIO
$50+ million production facility $24.6 million grant from the US DoE
Washington Montana
North Dakota
Vermont
Minnesota
Oregon
Michigan
New Hampshire
Wisconsin
Idaho
Massachusetts under Recovery and Reinvestment Act. New York the American
South Dakota Wyoming
$200 million production facility $95.5 million grant from the US DoE Nevada
Rhode Island Connecticut Iowa
Pennsylvania
Nebraska
Utah
Illinois
Indiana
Ohio West Virginia
Colorado
California
Arizona New Mexico
Maine
Kansas
Missouri
North Carolina South Carolina
Arkansas Mississippi
Texas
Alaska March 15, 2010 in Jacksonville, Florida
Virginia
Kentucky Tennessee
Oklahoma
New Jersey Delaware Maryland
Alabama
Georgia
Louisiana
Florida
Hawaii
2006 SAFT forms a joint venture with Johnson Controls 2009 SAFT America to Build New Advanced Battery Plant in Jacksonville, Florida The new plant will manufacture lithium-ion cells, modules and battery packs for military, industrial, and agricultural vehicles
1. Argonne National Laboratory Source: BASF.com, SAFT.com, chemweek.com, prnewswire.com
October 27, 2010 in Elyria, Ohio
Disconnection between patents share and manufacturing share Case Study: Bioethanol production % %
Bioethanol production share in 2009 Industrial Biotechnologies Patent Share
Europe
USA
5% 54% 36%
China 3%
34% 23%
Brazil
Asia
34% 4%
Others 7% Source: European Biomass Industry Association, European Biofuels Technology Platform (EBTP), European Competitiveness Report 2010, European Competitiveness in Key Enabling Technologies (TNO/ZEW)
18
Brazilian government still increases its investments in Industrial Biotechnologies • In 2009, state governed Brazilian company Petrobras announces to invest 2,8B$ in biofuels • July, 2010, the Brazilian Innovation Agency FINEP and Brazil’s National Development Bank (BNDES) finance 540M$ for the country’s biofuels sector • June 2011, Brazilian state‐owned development bank BNDES announced that it will make $18‐22 billion in loans to the sugarcane and ethanol sector
• EIB loans provided to all renewable energy sector in 2010: 6B€
1. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act 2. Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos: The Brazilian Innovation Agency Source: Own Analysis, Web site of Department of Energy, of the ARRA (American Recovery and Reinvestment Act ), www.biopreferred.gov, http://www.agribionet.org/client/page1.asp?page=3159&clef=19&clef2=11, http://www.energyrefuge.com/blog/brazilian-bioethanol-researchgets-funding-boost/, http://biofuelsdigest.com/bdigest/2011/06/08/brazil-to-invest-22b-in-ethanol-gm-ceo-says-ethanol-has-not-much-future-inus/, EPIA
US attracts our young KET champions (they go as far as financing 50% of Pilot Lines, and giving loans for the rest). February 2011
UK INEOS Bio builds a plant in the US with
>95% subsidies and loans guarantees Washington Montana
North Dakota
Vermont
Minnesota
Oregon
Maine
Michigan New Hampshire
Wisconsin
Idaho
South Dakota
Rhode Island Connecticut Iowa
Nevada
Pennsylvania
Nebraska Utah
Illinois
Indiana
Ohio West Virginia
Colorado
California
Kansas
Missouri
New Mexico
Oklahoma
Virginia
North Carolina South Carolina
Arkansas Mississippi
Texas
New Jersey Delaware Maryland
Kentucky Tennessee
Arizona
Massachusetts
New York
Wyoming
Alabama
Georgia
Louisiana
Florida Alaska Hawaii
$130 million production facility to produce advanced biofuels from waste $50 million Grant from the U.S. Department of Energy $75 million loan guarantee from the U.S. Department of Agriculture Source:Cross-sectoral Analysis of the Impact of International Industrial Policy on Key Enabling Technologies (Danish Technological Institute with IDEA Consult, 2011), http://americanfuels.blogspot.com/2011/02/ineos-bio-jv-breaks-ground-on-florida.html,
Disconnection between patents share and manufacturing share Case Study: PV Cell production %
PV cell production share in 2009
Europe = 77 % % Photonics Patent Share
of global market
Europe First Solar
13%
12% 29%
Japan China/Taiwan 15%
27% 42% 42%
Asia 18%
Others 2% Source: Photon International Mars 2010, European Competitiveness Report 2010, European Competitiveness in Key Enabling Technologies (TNO/ZEW) « JP Morgan, PV News, Oliver Wyman Analysis”
21
TOP10 manufacturers of solar panels/cells 2004 to 2010 Cell production in MWp
1
Sharp
75
1
Sharp
324
First Solar
2
Kyocera
51
2
Kyocera
105
Suntech
2
Shell solar
4 5
~21B$ “loans” 51
3
BP Solar
by government owned banks 40 4 Q-Cells for four major Chinese PV 24 5 Mitsubishi Astropower manufacturers BP solar
85
Sharp
75
Q-Cells
75
Yingli
1100 704 595 5,3B$ 571
4,4B$ 525
Suntech
1250
First Solar
1228
Yingli Solar
950
JA Solar
900
Sharp
750
6
Sanyo
20
6
Shell solar
72
JA Solar
520
Q-Cells
700
7
Isofoton
16
7
Sanyo
65
Kyocera
400
Gintech
700
7
RWE Solar
16
8
Schott Solar
63
Trina Solar
399
Motech
600
9
Mistubishi
12
9
Isofoton
53
SunPower
397
Trina Solar
600
9 Photowatt
12
10 Motech
35
Gintech
368
Kyocera
550 22
Sources : Photon international mars 2010 Solar Cell Production and Market Implementation in Japan, USA and the European Union - Joint Research Centre - European Commission - A Jäger-Waldau – 2002
“China solar PV credit agreements reach ~$33.6B” Deutsche Bank Global Market Research March 2011
Jinko Solar gets $7.6 Billion credit facility Jinko, a pretender for the remaining two non‐Asian places among the TOP10 for 2011 Source: Photon international mars 2010, Solar Cell Production and Market Implementation in Japan, USA and the EU ‐ JRC ‐ EC ‐ A Jäger‐Waldau – 2002, www.latribune.fr/green‐business, http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/bizchina/2010‐07/09/content_10087488.htm, Bloomberg, http://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/stories/2008/07/14/daily17.html, http://www.bizjournals.com/albany/stories/2010/05/31/daily1.html, http://www.iceach.com/htm_news/2010‐9/9346_873700.htm, http://solar‐energy‐news‐and‐ views.blogspot.com/2011/03/jinko‐solar‐gets‐76‐billion‐credit.html, EPIA, Deutsche Bank Global Market Research
The European ‘‘ valley of death ’’
Knowledge Market
The valley of death 24
China is agressively ramping up the value chain to address future systems markets
LED value chain
Materials
Chips
Components
Systems and luminaires
Market size 2009
$0,07B
$0,23B
$0,65B
$1,97B
CAGR 2009-2015
+55%
+58%
+59%
+70%
Governmental Incentives Up to 50% of the cost of a MOCVD reactor
+1000 new MOCVD reactors installed in 2010-2012
2’’ equivalent per month capacity X10 Q4 2009 : 140,000 Q4 2011 : 1,465,000
Equipments $1B “… MOCVD equipment for LED production is almost But until monopolized by German when? AIXTRON and American VEECO”
« …some Chinese programs seem to exist to copy western equipments.»
Source : Yole, DOE manufacturing roadmap, Strategies Unlimited, Morgan Stanley
Services
?
• LED cities will have at least 21 cities install a minimum of 10,000 LED streetlights each • Guangdong Province (China): $90 Million budget to subsidize 30% of LED street lamp cost
Demand Side Measures
Our KET champions are as well attracted by Russia, thanks to its Rusnano investment fund
RUSNANO Enters $300 Million
• CNRS‐INPG‐UJF‐CEA • 30 scientists • Located in Minatec • Spin electronics, MRAM, magneto‐optic
Deal to Build Advanced MRAM Manufacturing Facility in Russia
recording,..
2011
"success story" O. Redon
JP. Nozieres
B. Dieny
CEA CNRS co‐founders European VC
"We selected Crocus because we believe their technology is best‐in‐class and promises to bring differentiated MRAM products to market", said A. Chubais, CEO RUSNANO
US‐PCAST (similar to EC HLG) obtained similar findings to us !
May 2011 Intermediate report
Recommended actions by the PCAST1 – strong overlap with HLG‐KET recommendations can be observed Pillar 3: co‐location R&D/Manufacturing Pillar 2: accelerating the manufacturing process
Combining the funding
Pillar 1: technology infrastructure
Valley of death
1. President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology Source: Report to the President: Ensuring American Leadership In Advanced Manufacturing (PCAST, 2011), http://www.manufacturingnews.com/news/11/0531/ami.html
Pillar 3: overcoming the market failure
China has put firms at the centre of innovation and supports specific KETs State Laboratories 1975
1995
2005
Shift from a PRO1‐centered innovation system to a firm‐centred one
Consolidation of R&D infrastructure with the construction of 199 state of the art State Key Laboratories (SKL)
• 80/199 SKLs are explicitly dedicated to the KETs • ~32000 employees • “most Chinese enterprises don’t have research teams of their own”
1. PRO : Public Research Organization Sources: A Guide to the Chinese State Key Laboratories by the Helmholtz Gemeinschaft Beijing Representative Office 2007, OECD
International benchmark on the share of basic, applied and development activities funded by China, Korea, the US, the Member States and the EU Korean, Chinese and US federal R&D funds mainly go to applied “Development” whereas Europe has the highest share of Basic Research Funding Basic
FP7
Applied
Development
100 19%
90
EIT+JTI - 7%
80 70
CIP+PPP - 11%
44% 58%
48%
60
45%
50 32%
40 30
FP7 82%
28%
32%
20
36%
10
24%
24%
Korea
US
11% 0 China
Sum of Member States
EU
7th FWP EU 2010 Source: Key Science and Engineering Indicators, National Science Board, 2010 Digest, NSF, http://cordis.europa.eu/erawatch, OECD " Research and Development Statistics “, Own analysis
Outline Part 1 KETS ?
Part 2 KETs global playing field
1.1 - Importance of KETs to address European societal challenges 1.2 - KETs underpin significant value chains 2.1 – KETs SWOT analysis 2.2 - KETs manufacturing initiative in US 2.3 – Analysis of public supporting measures to RDI (in third countries)
Part 3 HLG recommendations
2.4 - Balance between basic and applied research
3.1 - A single and fully-fledged KETs innovation policy at EU Level to pass across the ‘valley of death’ 3.2 - A comprehensive strategic approach to a KETs policy at EU level
Part 4
3.3 - Combined financing to promote RDI investments in KETS
How can ITRE Committee assist
A KETs label and fully-fledged KETs innovation policy at EU Level …to pass across the ‘valley of death’ A single and integrated approach to KETs
The three pillars bridge
Recommendation 1:
Recommendation 2: Recommendation 3: Recommendation 4:
“Make KETs a technological priority for Europe’’
“The EU should “Fully exploit the apply the TRL scale scope of relevant R&D definition’’ R&D definitions’’
‘‘ an integrated KETs policy (CSF, regional policy, EIB)’’
“Rebalancing of EU RDI funding programmes’’
A comprehensive strategic approach to a KETs policy at EU level
Industrial driven approach to maximise the European added value
Recommendation 5:
Recommendation 6:
Recommendation 9:
“A strategic approach to KETs programmes’’
“Establish an appropriate set of rules to implement KETs programmes’’
“Globally competitive IP policy in Europe’’
‘‘Top down calls ’’
‘Simultaneous commitments from stakeholders’’
‘Similar to Bayh Dole Act’
Combined financing to promote RDI investments in KETS
Combination funding
Recommendation 7: DG …
Member states
EU
“Combined funding mechanisms’’
DG … DG …
Combination funding
Recommendation 8 : “KETs state aid provisions’’
Public driven
Private driven
Manufacturing capacity competitiveness Technology competitiveness
Recommendation N° 10 Build, strengthen and retain KETs skills The High Level Group recommends that the EU should create a European Technology Research Council (ETRC) to promote individual excellence in technologically focused engineering research and innovation and establish the appropriate framework conditions through the ESF regulation in order to support KETs skills capacity building at national and regional level.
ERC Basic research
Technological research
Outline Part 1 Methodology
Part 2 Update on KETs global playing field
1.1 - HLG KETs timeline 1.2 - KETs phase 2 methology 2.1 - Latest news 2.2 - Advanced manufacturing initiative in US 2.3 – Analysis of public supporting measures to RDI (in third countries)
Part 3 Proposals and recommendations
2.4 - Balance between basic and applied research
3.1 - A single and fully-fledged KETs innovation policy at EU Level to pass across the ‘valley of death’ 3.2 - A comprehensive strategic approach to a KETs policy at EU level
Part 4
3.3 - Combined financing to promote RDI investments in KETS
How can ITRE Committee assist
How can ITRE Committee assist ? • Recommend to EC the immediate and full implementation of the High Level Group on KETs recommendations in the context of the common negotiation on CSF / Horizon 2020 • Demand clear and unambigous targets with EC research and innovation budgets for Basic, Applied and Development research funding (aligned with international best practice) • Hold full ITRE Parliament hearing on “Level Playing Field for KETs European industry”
KETs for marKETs and
European KETs for the global marKET
Conclusion
Thank you for your attention
[email protected]
Máire Geoghegan‐Quinn Commissioner (Abs. in picture below)