Presentation

20 downloads 232378 Views 1MB Size Report
Aug 7, 2011 ... citatio n. K. +. Residual sample 1. Component 1. Component 2. Component K. E xc ita tio n 1. Emission 1. E xc ita tio n 2. Emission 2. E xc ita tio.
8/7/2011

Fourth IWA NOM Specialty Conference on Natural Organic Matter: From Source to Tap and Beyond July 27-29, 2011, Costa Mesa, California, U.S.A.

Understanding dissolved organic matter in wastewater using an EfOM-focused PARAFAC model for assessment of EfOM impacts on a watershed

Seong-Nam Nam1, Gary L. Amy2 1National

Institute of Environmental Research, South Korea 2Water Desalination and Reuse Center King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Saudi Arabia

Objectives 1. To apply PARAFAC modeling to Fluorescence Excitation-Emission Matrix (F-EEM) data • “Quantitative” characterization of NOM, depending on its source/origin • NOM properties vs. abundance of fluorophores • Assessment of wastewater impact in a watershed

2. To understand treatability of EfOM and contributions of each NOM fluorophore to treatment processes: • Coagulation • Biodegradation • Membrane Filtration

1

8/7/2011

Experimental Methods • Source waters for EEMs dataset •

~423 EEMs from WWTPs, DWTPs, and river samples from 6 watersheds (including upstream and downstream sites of WWTPs)



Some representative allochthonous and autochthonous NOM isolates



Laboratory-generated samples

(e.g. SRHA, SRFA, SRNOM, EfOM, SMP, etc.) (e.g. coagulation, biodegradation, membrane filtration)

• Fluorescence measurement/PARAFAC processing… •

Ex/Em =240-450/290-500nm, DOC:~1.0, pH=2.8 at Signal to Ratio mode



Correction: Blank subtraction/Inner-filter/Water Raman correction



One EEM: 201 by 43 matrix dimension, total dataset: 201x43x423



Removing the Rayleigh scattering, non-negative constraints



PARAFAC N-Way V2.1 toolbox, Split-half validation method, core consistency

Fluorescence measurement

Emitted from sample

Excites sample

Sample in cuvette

Light source

Detector

2

8/7/2011

Fluorescence Excitation-Emission Matrix (F-EEM)

F-EEM Dataset for Parallel Factor Analysis (PARAFAC)

Sample N

X

Sample 2 Sample 1

3

8/7/2011

How does PARAFAC work?

Emission 1

Sample 1

Dataset

Excitation 1 Component 1

Excitation 2

Excitation 1 Sample 1

+

Sample 2

+…+

Component 2

Emission N Excitation N

+ Residual (sample 1 to N)

Sample K

Emission 2

Emission 1

Emission 1

+…+

Emission K Excitation K

X

Emission 2 Excitation 2

Excitation 1

+

+

Residual sample 1

Component K

Development of EfOM-focused PARAFAC model

4

8/7/2011

What is Effluent Organic Matter (EfOM)?

Drinking water source

NOM Drinking water NOM, Municipal treatment plant use

NOM, BOM

Wastewater treatment plant NOM, SMPs

Ambient water (river)

Wastewater reclamation and reuse

EfOM  NOM + SMPs

PARAFAC: Identification of fluorophores (i.e., components) 440

420

Component 2

420 400

380

380

380

360

360

340

300 280

270/455 320

340

360

380

400 420 Em. (nm)

440

460

480

400

320 300 280 260

320

340

360

380

400 420 Em. (nm)

440

460

480

500

240 300

325/401 320

340

360

380

400 420 Em. (nm)

440

460

480

500

440

Component 4

420

360

360

Ex. (nm)

380

340

275/326

320

340

300

280

280

260

260 340

360

380

400 420 Em. (nm)

C1, C3 & C5: Humic-like

440

460

480

comp 5 > comp 3 > comp 4 > comp 2

EEMs: Membrane feed, permeate, retentate, and backwash (UF) Feed

Permeate

DOC=13.1 mg/L

DOC=10.8 mg/L

Retentate

Backwashed

DOC=14.8 mg/L

DOC=13.1 mg/L

12

8/7/2011

Application of PARAFAC to membrane filtration: changes of components 5.0

Feed Permeate Retentate Backwash

0.3

DOC of components (mg/L)

Fraction of components

0.4

0.2

0.1

Feed Permeate Retentate Backwash

4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0

0.0 1

2

3

4

5

1

2

Components

3

4

5

Components

 Significant variations of component 4 Indicating protein-like organic matter as major membrane foulant ?

Conclusions Conclusions •

5 components (statistical fluorophores) identified • Allochthonous NOM: dominant with component 1 and component 5 • Autochthonous NOM: dominant with component 2 and component 4



Application of Fluorescence with PARAFAC modeling to NOM/EfOM • Clear differentiation between NOM and EfOM • Provides accurate evaluation of % EfOM impact



Advantages/Diverse Applicability of PARAFAC • Excellent sensitivity and good linearity • Applicable to various treatment processes

13

8/7/2011

Conclusions Acknowledgements • Water Research Foundation  Partial Funding • Stuart Krasner:  Primidone Measurements +

14