JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, June 2003, p. 2289–2293 0095-1137/03/$08.00⫹0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.41.6.2289–2293.2003 Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Vol. 41, No. 6
Prevalence of Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli among Children with and without Diarrhea in Switzerland Werner L. Pabst,1 Martin Altwegg,2 Christian Kind,3 Slavko Mirjanic,3 Daniel Hardegger,2 and David Nadal1* Division of Infectious Diseases, University Children’s Hospital of Zurich,1 and Institute of Medical Microbiology,2 University of Zurich, Zurich, and Ostschweizer Children’s Hospital, St. Gallen,3 Switzerland Received 21 January 2003/Returned for modification 27 February 2003/Accepted 14 March 2003
In a prospective study between July 1999 and September 2000, stool specimens of children below the age of 16 years with (n ⴝ 187) and without (n ⴝ 137) diarrhea were tested for the presence of enterovirulent bacteria by standard culture methods and by PCR. Targets for the PCR were the plasmid pCVD432 for enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC), the verotoxin 1 and verotoxin 2 genes for enterohemorrhagic E. coli, ipaH for enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC) and Shigella spp., genes coding for heat-stable and heat-labile toxins for enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), and the eaeA gene for enteropathogenic E. coli. The following bacteria could be associated with diarrhea: Salmonella enterica (P ⴝ 0.001), Campylobacter spp. (P ⴝ 0.036), ETEC (P ⴝ 0.012), and EAEC (P ⴝ 0.006). The detection of EAEC, ETEC, and S. enterica was strongly associated with a history of recent travel outside of Switzerland. EAEC isolates were found in the specimens of 19 (10.2%) of 187 children with diarrhea and in those of 3 (2.2%) of 137 children without diarrhea (P ⴝ 0.006) and were the most frequently detected bacteria associated with diarrhea. Among the children below the age of 5 years, the specimens of 18 (11.9%) of 151 with diarrhea were positive for EAEC, while this agent was found in the specimens of 2 (2.2%) of 91 controls (P ⴝ 0.007). Enteropathogenic E. coli isolates were found in the specimens of 30 (16.4%) of the patients and in those of 15 (10.9%) of the controls, with similar frequencies in all age groups (P > 0.05). We conclude that EAEC bacteria are involved in a significant proportion of diarrhea cases among children. Children younger than 5 years of age are more often affected by EAEC than older children. Six different types of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli have been identified. These include enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC), enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC), enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), and diffusely adherent E. coli (18). The importance of EAEC bacteria as diarrheagenic agents in children remains controversial. Although the association of EAEC with diarrhea in children has been documented in different studies in industrially developing and developed countries (4, 5, 7, 13, 15, 19, 23), other studies did not associate EAEC with diarrhea (2, 8, 11). This lack of association may be partially explained by the significant strain-to-strain heterogeneity due to the presence of various presumed virulence factors that are not conserved among all EAEC bacteria or by the subjective interpretation of the standard laboratory test, i.e., the observation of an aggregative adherence pattern in a HEp-2 cell assay. Moreover, the importance of EAEC appears to vary geographically. The aim of the present prospective study was to determine the importance of EAEC among children with diarrhea in Switzerland by using the PCR targeting plasmid pCVD432. (This research was presented in part at the 101st General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology, Orlando, Fla., 20 to 24 May 2001 [Abstr. 101st Gen. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol., abstr. C-465, p. 259, 2001].)
MATERIALS AND METHODS Clinical samples. Stool specimens were collected prospectively from children with acute or chronic diarrhea who were seen at the Children’s University Hospital of Zurich and at the Ostschweizer Children’s Hospital between August 1999 and September 2000. Diarrhea was defined as at least two loose stools within 24 h. An episode was considered chronic if it lasted for more than 14 days. Patients who had developed diarrhea only after admission to the hospital and those who had received antimicrobials in the previous 14 days were excluded. Clinical symptoms, including vomiting, a fever of ⬎38.5°C, and dehydration, as well as any history of recent travel outside of Switzerland, were recorded. Dehydration was defined by clinical characteristics, e.g., tacky mucous membranes, sunken eyes or fontanel, and poor skin turgor. Stool specimens from children seen at the two hospitals during the same time period for treatment of other diseases, i.e., children who had not experienced diarrhea, vomiting, or abdominal pain in the preceding 2 weeks prior to admission and who had not received antimicrobials in the previous 2 weeks, served as controls. Informed consent to collect a stool specimen from each of the children was gathered from their parents or guardians. The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee. Stool specimens were either inoculated onto culture media within 6 h or stored in Cary-Blair transport medium for up to 72 h. Bacterial cultures. The bacterial pathogens Salmonella enterica, Shigella spp., Campylobacter spp., Yersinia spp., and Aeromonas spp. were sought by standard methods (17). Detection of enterovirulent E. coli by PCR. The oligonucleotide primers used in this study are listed in Table 1. Stool specimens were inoculated onto MacConkey agar plates and incubated aerobically at 37°C for 24 h. Bacteria from the area of confluent growth were suspended in 5 ml of a 0.85% NaCl solution until a density equivalent to McFarland standard 6 was reached and were stored at ⫺20°C until use. After thawing, 0.5 ml of the bacterial suspension was centrifuged and the supernatant was discarded. The pelleted cells were resuspended in 200 l of 4% Chelex (Bio-Rad Laboratories AG, Reinach, Switzerland), and the DNA was extracted at 95°C for 15 min. After centrifugation, PCR was performed directly from the supernatant. The PCR mixtures with a final volume of 50 l consisted of 5 l of bacterial lysate (supernatant with template DNA); 0.2 mM (each) dGTP, dATP, dTTP, and dCTP (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany); a 0.2 M (0.25 M in assays for pCVD432, genes coding for heat-
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of Infectious Diseases, University Children’s Hospital of Zurich, Steinwiesstrasse 75, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland. Phone: 41-1-266 7562. Fax: 41-1-266 7157. E-mail:
[email protected]. 2289
RESULTS Demographics. During the 15-month study period, stool specimens were investigated from a total of 187 children 1 to 189 months of age (mean, 38 months; median, 21 months) with diarrhea and from a total of 137 randomly selected children 1 to 174 months of age (mean, 50 months; median, 27 months) without diarrhea seen at two children’s hospitals in Switzerland. Among the children with diarrhea, 79 (42.2%) were girls, and among those without diarrhea, 58 (42.3%) were girls. Isolation of enteric pathogens. One or more potential enteric pathogens were found in the specimens of 94 (50.3%) of the 187 patients with diarrhea and in 20 (14.6%) of the 137
b
labile toxin [LT] and heat-stable toxin [ST], and ipaH) concentration each of the reverse and forward primers (Microsynth, Balgach, Switzerland); 10 mM TrisHCl; 1.5 mM MgCl2; 50 mM KCl; 0.5 M EDTA; 25 M dithiothreitol; 1.25 U of Taq DNA polymerase; stabilizers; and 0.25% glycerol (Amersham Biosciences AB, Uppsala, Sweden). PCR was performed with the GeneAmp PCR System 9600 (Perkin-Elmer Applied Biosystems, Inc., Foster City, Calif.). The reaction was started with a 5-min denaturation step at 94°C. In the PCRs for the verotoxin 1 (VT 1) gene, the VT 2 gene, and eaeA, the temperature cycles consisted of 15 s at 94°C, followed by 15 s at 65°C and 75 s at 72°C. In the PCRs for pCVD432, the LT gene, the ST gene, and ipaH, the temperature cycles consisted of 30 s at 94°C, followed by 30 s at 55°C and 30 s at 72°C. Each cycle was repeated 35 times, and the final cycle was followed by incubation of the reaction mixture for 5 min at 72°C. The amplified DNA was separated by submarine gel electrophoresis on 1% agarose, stained with ethidium bromide, and visualized under UV transillumination. Detection of rotavirus and adenovirus. Rotavirus and adenovirus were detected by commercially available antigen detection assays (Diarlex; Orion Diagnostica, Espoo, Finland) in patients with diarrhea only. Statistical analysis. Data were compared by a two-tailed chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test. A P value of ⬍0.05 was considered statistically significant.
a
Specimens positive for pCVD432 were interpreted as harboring EAEC. Specimens positive for the VT 1 or VT 2 gene with a positive result for eaeA (a gene on the locus of enterocyte effacement) were interpreted as harboring EHEC, VT 1 gene- or VT 2 gene-positive specimens without a positive eaeA result were interpreted as harboring VTEC. c Specimens positive only for eaeA represent EPEC. d Since ipaH is present in both EIEC and Shigella spp., specimens positive for ipaH with cultural detection of Shigella spp. were considered to contain Shigella spp., whereas specimens positive for ipaH with negative culture results were interpreted as EIEC. e ST and LT are virulence factors of ETEC. b
0/91 (0) 0/46 (0) 0/137 (0) 0/151 (0) 0/36 (0) 0/187 (0) NS NS NS 1/91 (1.1) 0/46 (0) 1/137 (0.7) 1/151 (0.7) 0/36 (0) 1/187 (0.5)
a
NS NS 0.036
5⬘-TCTGTATTGTCTTTTTCACC-3⬘ 5⬘-TTAATAGCACCCGGTACAAGC-3⬘
0/91 (0) 0/46 (0) 0/137 (0)
9
5/151 (3.3) 1/36 (2.8) 6/187 (3.2)
186
NS NS NS
ST genee
0/91 (0) 0/46 (0) 0/137 (0)
5⬘-GGCGACAGATTATACCGTGC-3⬘ 5⬘-CCGAATTCTGTTATATATGTC-3⬘
1/151 (0.7) 1/36 (2.8) 2b/187 (1.1)
9
0.035 0.014 0.001
750
0/91 (0) 0/46 (0) 0/137 (0)
LTe
7/151 (4.6) 5/36 (13.9) 12/187 (6.4)
5⬘-GTGGCGAATACTGGCGAGACT-3⬘ 5⬘-CCCCATTCTTTTTCACCGTCG-3⬘
0–5 ⬎5 All
10
C
890
D
eaeAb,c
P
5⬘-TGGAAAAACTCAGTGCCTCT-3⬘ 5⬘-CCAGTCCGTAAATTCATTCT-3⬘
C
16
Aeromonas spp.
422
D
ipaHd
P
5⬘-CCATGACAACGGACAGCAGTT-3⬘ 5⬘-CCTGTCAACTGAGCACTTTG-3⬘
C
10
Campylobacter spp.
779
D
VT 2 geneb
P
5⬘-CATTGTCTGGTGACAGTAGCT-3⬘ 5⬘-CCCGTAATTTGCGCACTGAG-3⬘
C
10
Shigella spp.
732
D
VT 1 geneb
P
5⬘-CTGGCGAAAGACTGTATCAT-3⬘ 5⬘-CAATGTATAGAAATCCGCTGTT-3⬘
Salmonella enterica
22
D
630
Resultsa for indicated bacterial species
pCVD432a
Yersinia enterocolitica
Primer pair
Age (yr)
Sequence Reference size (bp)
TABLE 2. Bacterial enteropathogens other than E. coli detected by culture in children with and without diarrhea
Target
P
TABLE 1. Oligonucleotide primer pairs used in the study
Results for specimens from patients with diarrhea (D) and controls (C) are given as numbers of positive specimens per total number investigated. Values in parentheses are percentages. NS, not statistically significant. The specimens from both patients were positive for ipaH by PCR.
J. CLIN. MICROBIOL. NS NS NS
PABST ET AL.
C
2290
VOL. 41, 2003
ENTEROAGGREGATIVE E. COLI IN DIARRHEA OF CHILDREN Age (yr)
0–5 ⬎5 All D
2/91 (2.2) 1/46 (2.2) 3/137 (2.2)
C
0.007 NS 0.006
P
3b/151 (0.7) 0/36 (0) 3/187 (1.6)
D
0/91 (0) 1/46 (2.2) 1/137 (0.7)
C
NS NS NS
P
2/151 (1.3) 0/36 (0) 2/187c (1.1)
D
0/91 (0) 0/46 (0) 0/137 (0)
C
NS NS NS
P
24/151 (16.0) 6/36 (16.7) 30/187 (16.0)
D
11/91 (12.9) 4/46 (8.7) 15/137 (10.9)
C
NS NS NS
P
6/151 (4.0) 2/36 (5.6) 8/187 (4.3)
D
0/91 (0) 0/46 (0) 0/137 (0)
C
0.057 NS 0.012
P
EAEC
18/151 (11.9) 1/36 (2.8) 19/187 (10.2)
EIEC
Resultsa for indicated enterovirulent E. coli types
EPEC
TABLE 3. Detection of enterovirulent E. coli in children with and without diarrhea
VTEC and EHEC ETEC
a Results for specimens from patients with diarrhea (D) and controls (C) are given as numbers of positive specimens per total number investigated. Values in parentheses are percentages. NS, not statistically significant. One specimen was positive for verotoxin and eaeA. In the PCR assay, four specimens were positive for ipaH. However, the results for the two ipaH-positive specimens in which Shigella spp. were culturally detected are not listed here but are in Table 2.
b
c
controls (P ⬍ 0.0001). Among the 94 patients with diarrhea, 63 were found to have bacterial pathogens only, 25 were found to have viral pathogens but no bacterial pathogens, and 6 were found to have both viral and bacterial pathogens in their stool specimens. Multiple pathogens were detected in 17 patients with diarrhea, whereas more than one pathogen was never isolated from a control child. Isolation of bacterial enteropathogens other than E. coli. Table 2 lists the identified bacterial enteropathogens other than E. coli. S. enterica and Campylobacter spp. were the most commonly found bacterial enteropathogens and were detected in stools from children with diarrhea 6 and 3 times, respectively, more often than Shigella spp. and 12 and 6 times, respectively, more often than Aeromonas spp. No Yersinia enterocolitica was isolated. Except for the Aeromonas sp. found in a single case, none of these enteropathogens were isolated from the stools of control subjects. Detection of rotavirus and adenovirus. Among patients with diarrhea, rotavirus and adenovirus were detected in 25 (18.7%) of 134 and in 8 (6.3%) of 127 stool specimens investigated, respectively. Detection of enterovirulent E. coli. The results of the PCR assays for enterovirulent E. coli are presented in Table 3. Among the children with diarrhea, EPEC isolates were detected more frequently than isolates of EAEC, EHEC or verotoxin-producing E. coli (VTEC), EIEC, and ETEC, with detection rates being 16.0% for EPEC, 10.2% for EAEC, 1.6% for EHEC or VTEC, 1.1% for EIEC, and 4.3% for ETEC. However, EPEC isolates were detected in similar frequencies in the specimens of children with diarrhea and in those of controls. EIEC isolates were detected only in stools from children with diarrhea. EAEC isolates were found in significantly more children with diarrhea than in children without diarrhea (P ⫽ 0.006). This difference was due to the higher frequency of EAEC isolates being detected in the specimens of diarrheic children ⱕ5 years of age. In the group of children who were ⬎5 years of age, EAEC isolates were rare and were detected in similar frequencies among children with diarrhea and in controls. Finally, ETEC isolates were detected only in children with diarrhea (P ⫽ 0.012). The frequencies in children ⱕ5 years and children ⬎5 years were similar (Table 3). Table 4 lists the pathogens in the 17 patients with diarrhea in whom two or more potentially enterovirulent agents were detected. Thirteen of the 17 patients reported recent travel abroad. Eight of the 19 patients with both diarrhea and EAEC additionally had other potential enterovirulent agents in their stools. Eight of the 19 patients positive for EAEC were screened for rotavirus and adenovirus. One patient was positive for adenovirus. Enterovirulent E. coli bacteria were found with similar frequencies in children with acute diarrhea and in children with chronic diarrhea. Forty-three (23%) patients presented with chronic diarrhea. The most common pathogens found in these patients were EPEC (19%) and EAEC (12%). Among the 11 patients with diarrhea specimens in which EAEC isolates were the only detected pathogens, 3 patients (27%) presented with chronic diarrhea, 6 patients (55%) presented with vomiting, 5 patients (45%) had clinical signs of dehydration and needed intravenous rehydration, and 2 patients (18%) had a fever of ⬎38.5°C.
2291
2292
PABST ET AL.
J. CLIN. MICROBIOL.
TABLE 4. Frequency of recent travel abroad among 17 children with diarrhea and with pathogens found in their specimens Initially and additionally detected pathogen(s)
No. of patients with recent travel/no. of positive specimens
EAEC ⫹ EPEC ...................................................................... ⫹ EPEC ⫹ ETEC ..................................................... ⫹ EPEC ⫹ adenovirus.............................................. ⫹ ETEC ...................................................................... ⫹ S. enterica................................................................
2/3 1/1 1/1 1/2 1/1
EPEC ⫹ ETEC ⫹ EIEC ...................................................... ⫹ ETEC ⫹ Shigella spp. ........................................... ⫹ C. jejuni................................................................... ⫹ adenovirus .............................................................. ⫹ rotavirus ..................................................................
1/1 1/1 1/1 0/1 0/1
ETEC ⫹ adenovirus ⫹ rotavirus ......................................... 1/1 ⫹ adenovirus .............................................................. 1/1 EHECa ⫹ adenovirus .............................................................. 1/1 Adenovirus ⫹ rotavirus .................................................................. 1/1 a
The specimen was positive for the gene coding for VT1 and VT2 and eaeA.
Travel history. Thirty-one (16.6%) of the patients with diarrhea, but none of those without diarrhea, had a history of recent travel outside of Switzerland. Among patients whose stool specimens tested positive for pathogens, the frequencies of their having a history of travel abroad were as follows: for patients with S. enterica, 50%; for patients with Shigella spp., 50%; for patients with Campylobacter spp., 17%; for patients with EAEC, 47%; for patients with EPEC, 37%; and for patients with ETEC, 75%. Patients with a history of travel abroad were found more often to be positive for S. enterica (19 versus 4%; P ⫽ 0.006), EAEC (29 versus 6%; P ⫽ 0.001), EPEC (36 versus 12%; P ⫽ 0.003), and ETEC (19 versus 1%; P ⬍ 0.0001) than were patients with no history of travel abroad. The most common travel destinations of the patients with diarrhea were Turkey (19%), the Balkan Peninsula (19%), and northern Africa (13%). Of note, five of the eight patients with ETEC had returned from these three destinations. DISCUSSION This prospective study demonstrates that EAEC bacteria are involved in a significant proportion of cases of diarrhea among children from an industrialized country, as are S. enterica, Campylobacter spp., and ETEC. EPEC isolates were detected in the specimens of children with diarrhea and in those of children without diarrhea with similar frequencies. The detection of EAEC, ETEC, and S. enterica was strongly associated with a history of recent travel outside of Switzerland, and EAEC isolates were detected more often in the specimens of children younger than 5 years of age than in those of older children. The identification of EAEC in this study was based on PCR with primers complementary for pCVD432 (22), a test repre-
senting one of the reliable means for detecting EAEC (21). The HEp-2 adherence test is regarded as the “gold standard” for the identification of EAEC (18), but it is conducted only in reference laboratories, as it requires specialized facilities (21). Moreover, since other enteric bacteria also exhibit aggregative phenotypes, confirmation of E. coli speciation is mandatory to unequivocally identify EAEC (21). The PCR assay, based on a previously described DNA probe (3), identified 86% of reference EAEC strains found to be positive by the HEp-2 cell adhesion assay and identified ⬍1% of other diarrheagenic E. coli strains (22). In a study conducted in Calcutta, India, the same PCR assay performed with similar sensitivity and specificity (7). In a Swiss study investigating the pathogenic role of EAEC among human immunodeficiency virus-infected persons, the pCVD432 PCR assay was demonstrated to better correlate with clinical findings than the cell adherence assay (6). Other studies, however, have provided evidence that pCVD432-probe-negative EAEC strains may also be associated with diarrheal illness (15, 20). An extreme example is represented by an outbreak of EAEC in Japan, where all isolates were negative by the pCVD432 PCR assay (14). Thus, in the present study, we may have underestimated the frequency of EAEC, but this would apply both to patients with diarrhea and to asymptomatic children. A substantial proportion of the diarrheic children had a history of travel outside of Switzerland. Although the percentage of patients suffering from diarrhea who had a history of travel was higher at one enrolling site (Zurich, 18%) than at the other (St. Gallen, 6%), this difference was not statistically significant (P ⫽ 0.32). Almost half of the patients with diarrhea positive for EAEC, but none of the control children with EAEC, had a history of recent travel outside of Switzerland. For comparison, a study conducted by Huppertz et al. in Germany found that approximately one-third of the children with diarrhea and detection of EAEC had traveled abroad (13). However, no information on the travel history was provided for other patients with diarrhea or for asymptomatic children. In adults, EAEC and ETEC were shown to be the major etiologic agents of traveler’s diarrhea (1). In our study, ETEC was detected only in children with diarrhea, and most of these children (75%) had a history of recent travel abroad. Thus, our data suggest that EAEC and ETEC may play a considerable role in traveler’s diarrhea during childhood, too. The proportion of children with diarrhea who were demonstrated to be infected with EAEC was unexpectedly high (10%). The frequency of EAEC detection in control children was 2%. In the large German study by Huppertz et al. (13), the frequency of EAEC detection in children was 2% and that in asymptomatic controls was 0%. Studies of EAEC conducted in less industrially developed countries revealed a prevalence of 39% in children with diarrhea and 27.7% in children without diarrhea (in Nigeria) (20) and a prevalence of 26.9% in children with diarrhea and 15% in controls (in Venezuela) (12). Thus, in developing countries, the prevalence of EAEC is considerably higher than in industrially developed countries. These observations may explain at least in part the high proportion of patients with diarrhea and EAEC associated with recent travel abroad. An observation of considerable interest was that children younger than 5 years of age were significantly more often
ENTEROAGGREGATIVE E. COLI IN DIARRHEA OF CHILDREN
VOL. 41, 2003
affected by EAEC than older children. Other studies also noted differences in prevalence of EAEC in various age groups. In the Venezuelan study, the difference in EAEC prevalence between children with diarrhea and asymptomatic controls was significant for the group 0 to 2 months of age but not for older infants (12). In the study conducted in Nigeria, however, EAEC was significantly more often isolated from children with diarrhea than from healthy control subjects in children ⬎6 months of age but not in those ⬍6 months of age (20). Our data suggest that the prevalence and significance of EAEC infections depend on age. Discordant results from other studies may be explained by the strain-to-strain heterogeneity in other geographical areas or by the existence of asymptomatic carriers. ETEC bacteria, however, show similar frequencies in children 0 to 5 years of age and in children 5 to 16 years of age. Eight (42%) of the 19 children with diarrhea and EAEC were found to harbor one or two additional potentially enterovirulent agents, EPEC being the most frequently detected (Table 4). The detection of multiple pathogens in diarrheic children with EAEC has also been reported from other studies (7, 12, 13). Since EPEC in this study was found in similar frequencies in diarrheic children and in nondiarrheic children, the pathogenic role of E. coli harboring only the eaeA gene has to be questioned. Consequently, it seems justified to disregard EPEC as a cause of diarrhea in those children harboring EAEC, which would increase the number of diarrheic children with EAEC as the only identified pathogen from 11 to 14. Only two-thirds of stool specimens from patients with diarrhea and none of the specimens of controls were analyzed for the presence of viruses, i.e., rotavirus and adenovirus, which may be regarded as a limitation of this study. Among diarrheic stools investigated for viruses, more than one-quarter of the specimens harbored either virus. Whereas rotavirus was found in combination with a bacterial pathogen in 2 of 25 cases only, adenovirus was detected together with a bacterial pathogen in 5 of 8 cases. Among the 69 diarrheic children with a potential bacterial enteric pathogen, 25 have not been screened for viruses. Of the eight diarrheic patients with EAEC who were tested for rotavirus and adenovirus, one patient was positive for adenovirus. In the study conducted by Huppertz et al. in Germany, 81% of the EAECpositive patients were screened for the presence of rotavirus but not for adenovirus (13). All EAEC-positive specimens investigated in our study were negative for rotavirus. Finally, the additional clinical signs in diarrheic patients infected with EAEC included vomiting in more than half of the patients and dehydration requiring intravenous fluid replacement in almost half of the patients. Furthermore, in about one-quarter of the patients, diarrhea became chronic, i.e., it lasted for more than 14 days, according to our definition. These observations are consistent with the so-far limited available data (13, 21). In children younger than 5 years of age with continuing diarrhea and a history of travel abroad, inclusion of tests for EAEC should be considered in the microbiological workup for diarrhea. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work was supported in part by GlaxoSmithKline AG (Mu ¨nchenbuchsee, Switzerland).
2293
We thank Inge Perschil and the laboratory staff of the Infectious Diseases Laboratory at the University Children’s Hospital of Zurich (Zurich, Switzerland) for their valuable technical help. REFERENCES 1. Adachi, J. A., Z. D. Jiang, J. J. Mathewson, M. P. Verenkar, S. Thompson, F. Martinez-Sandoval, R. Steffen, C. D. Ericsson, and H. L. DuPont. 2001. Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli as a major etiologic agent in traveler’s diarrhea in 3 regions of the world. Clin. Infect. Dis. 32:1706–1709. 2. Albert, M. J., A. S. G. Faruque, S. M. Faruque, R. B. Sack, and D. Mahalanabis. 1999. Case-control study of enteropathogens associated with childhood diarrhea in Dhaka, Bangladesh. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:3458–3464. 3. Baudry, B., S. J. Savarino, P. Vial, J. B. Kaper, and M. M. Levine. 1990. A sensitive and specific DNA probe to identify enteroaggregative Escherichia coli, a recently discovered diarrheal pathogen. J. Infect. Dis. 161:1249–1251. 4. Bhan, M. K., P. Raj, M. M. Levine, J. B. Kaper, N. Bhandari, R. Srivastava, R. Kumar, and S. Sazawal. 1989. Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli associated with persistent diarrhea in a cohort of rural children in India. J. Infect. Dis. 159:1061–1064. 5. Cravioto, A., A. Tello, A. Navarro, J. Ruiz, H. Villafan, F. Uribe, and C. Eslava. 1991. Association of Escherichia coli HEp-2 adherence patterns with type and duration of diarrhoea. Lancet 337:262–264. 6. Durrer, P., R. Zbinden, F. Fleisch, M. Altwegg, B. Ledergerber, H. Karch, and R. Weber. 2000. Intestinal infection due to enteroaggregative Escherichia coli among human immunodeficiency virus-infected persons. J. Infect. Dis. 182:1540–1544. 7. Dutta, S., S. Pal, S. Chakrabarti, P. Dutta, and B. Manna. 1999. Use of PCR to identify enteroaggregative Escherichia coli as an important cause of acute diarrhoea among children living in Calcutta, India. J. Med. Microbiol. 48:1011–1016. 8. Forestier, C., M. Meyer, S. Favre-Bonte, C. Rich, G. Malpuech, C. Le Bouguenec, J. Sirot, B. Joly, and C. De Champs. 1996. Enteroadherent Escherichia coli and diarrhea in children: a prospective case-control study. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:2897–2903. 9. Frankel, G., J. A. Giron, J. Valmassoi, and G. K. Schoolnik. 1989. Multi-gene amplification: simultaneous detection of three virulence genes in diarrhoeal stool. Mol. Microbiol. 3:1729–1734. 10. Gannon, V. P. J., S. D’Souza, T. Graham, R. K. King, K. Rahn, and S. Read. 1997. Use of the flagellar H7 gene as a target in multiplex PCR assays and improved specificity in identification of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli strains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:656–662. 11. Gascon, J., M. Vargas, D. Schellenberg, H. Urassa, C. Casals, E. Kahigwa, J. J. Aponte, H. Mshinda, and J. Vila. 2000. Diarrhea in children under 5 years of age from Ifakara, Tanzania: a case-control study. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:4459–4462. 12. Gonza ´lez, R., C. Díaz, M. Marin ˜ o, R. Cloralt, M. Pequeneze, and I. Pe´rezSchael. 1997. Age-specific prevalence of Escherichia coli with localized and aggregative adherence in Venezuelan infants with acute diarrhea. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:1103–1107. 13. Huppertz, H. I., S. Rutkowski, S. Aleksic, and H. Karch. 1997. Acute and chronic diarrhoea and abdominal colic associated with enteroaggregative Escherichia coli in young children living in western Europe. Lancet 349:1660–1662. 14. Itoh, Y., I. Nagano, M. Kunishima, and T. Ezaki. 1997. Laboratory investigation of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli O untypeable:H10 associated with a massive outbreak of gastrointestinal illness. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35: 2546–2550. 15. Jalaluddin, S., P. de Mol, W. Hemelhof, N. Bauma, D. Brasseur, P. Hennart, R. E. Lomoyo, B. Rowe, and J.-P. Butzler. 1998. Isolation and characterization of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAggEC) by genotypic and phenotypic markers, isolated from diarrheal children in Congo. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 4:213–219. 16. Luscher, D., and M. Altwegg. 1994. Detection of shigellae, enteroinvasive and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in patients returning from tropical countries. Mol. Cell. Probes 8:285–290. 17. Murray, P. R., E. J. Baron, M. A. Pfaller, F. C. Tenover, and R. H. Yolken (ed.). 1999. Manual of clinical microbiology, 7th ed. ASM Press, Washington, D.C. 18. Nataro, J. P., and J. B. Kaper. 1998. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 11:142–201. 19. Nataro, J. P., J. B. Kaper, R. Robins-Browne, V. Prado, P. Vial, and M. M. Levine. 1987. Patterns of adherence of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli to HEp-2 cells. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 6:829–831. 20. Okeke, I. N., A. Lamikanra, J. Czeczulin, F. Dubovsky, J. B. Kaper, and J. P. Nataro. 2000. Heterogeneous virulence of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli strains isolated from children in Southwest Nigeria. J. Infect. Dis. 181: 252–260. 21. Okeke, I. N., and J. P. Nataro. 2001. Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli. Lancet Infect. Dis. 1:304–313. 22. Schmidt, H., C. Knop, S. Franke, S. Aleksic, J. Heesemann, and H. Karch. 1995. Development of PCR for screening of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:701–705. 23. Wanke, C. A., J. B. Schorling, L. J. Barrett, M. A. Desouza, and R. L. Guerrant. 1991. Potential role of adherence traits of Escherichia coli in persistent diarrhea in an urban Brazilian slum. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 10: 746–751.
