the ordinary differential equation (ODE):. 2 . 2 ... Murray R. Spiegel, Schaum's Outline Series, International Edition, 1982). Note, this theory does notΒ ...
Proof of Keplerβs Third Law arising out of the Equation of Path of a Planetary Body about a Local Star We seek to solve the following integral: 2π
β«0
π 4
ππ 1 3π 2 [1+ cos(π+ )] 4 β2
= β«0
π02
πΊππ0
β
2
ππ‘
( 1)
which comes from the equation of path: π’=
2 1 3π [1 + cos (π + )] π0 4 β2
for a planet (or a comet) orbiting its local star. This is also the particular-solution to the ordinary differential equation (ODE): π2π’ πΊπ + π’ = ππ 2 β2 governing the bodyβs motion for an orbit of eccentricity π = 1/β2 within the given integral limits (see βA First Course in Mechanicsβ, by Dr Mary Lunn, Oxford University Press, 1992; also see βTheory and Problems of Theoretical Mechanicsβ, by Murray R. Spiegel, Schaumβs Outline Series, International Edition, 1982). Note, this theory does not work for Mercury, due to the relativistic gravitational precession of its orbit of 43 seconds of arc per century. We write the integral on the left-hand-side of equation (1) as: 2π
β«0 where we have set π = π +
2π
ππ π π
(1+ cos π)
2
= β«0
π2 ππ (π+π cos π)2
( 2)
3π 4
, β2 = π and 1 = π for the general case.
Put: π
π‘ = tan ( ) 2
( 3)
so that: 1
π
ππ‘ = 2 sec2 ( 2 ) ππ where: 1 π ππ‘ = (1 + tan2 ( )) ππ 2 2 or:
Page | 1
ππ‘ =
1 (1 + π‘ 2 )ππ 2
so that: 2ππ‘
ππ = (1+π‘ 2 )
( 4)
From the trigonometric relationship implied by equation (3): π
π‘
π
1
sin ( 2 ) = β1+π‘ 2
( 5)
and: cos ( 2 ) = β1+π‘ 2
( 6)
Now, since: π π sin(π) = 2 sin ( ) cos ( ) 2 2 then: 2π‘
sin(π) = (1+π‘2 )
( 7)
Also, since: π π cos(π) = cos 2 ( ) β sin2 ( ) 2 2 then π‘2
1
1βπ‘ 2
cos(π) = 1+π‘ 2 β 1+π‘ 2 = 1+π‘ 2
( 8)
Substituting: 2ππ‘
ππ = (1+π‘ 2 )
( 9)
and: cos(π) =
1βπ‘ 2
( 10 )
1+π‘ 2
into equation (2), we have: β«
π2 ππ =β« (π + π cos π)2
2π2 ππ‘ 2
1 β π‘2 (1 + π‘ 2 ) (π + π ( )) 1 + π‘2
or: π2 ππ
β« (π+π cos π)2 = β«
2π2 ππ‘ 2 π(1+π‘2 )+π(1βπ‘2 ) (1+π‘ 2 )[ ] 1+π‘2
=β«
2π2 ππ‘ 2 (π+π)+(πβπ)π‘2 ] 1+π‘2
(1+π‘ 2 )[
Page | 2
Factoring out the (π β π) term, we obtain: 2π2 ππ
2π2
β« (π+π cos π)2 = (πβπ)2 β«
(1+π‘ 2 )ππ‘
( 11 )
(π+π‘ 2 )2
π+π
where π = πβπ. The integral can now be expanded, via partial fractions, to yield: (1 β π)ππ‘ 2π2 ππ 2π2 ππ‘ β« {β« β« } = + (π + π cos π )2 (π β π)2 ( π + π‘ 2 )2 π + π‘2 or: β«
π2 ππ 2π2 ππ‘ ππ‘ ) {(1 β« β« } = β π + (π + π cos π )2 (π β π)2 (π + π‘ 2 ) 2 π + π‘2
The integral on the far right-hand-side is straightforward, where: ππ‘
1
π‘
β« π+π‘ 2 = βπ tanβ1 βπ
( 12 )
For the first integral on the right-hand-side, we use another trigonometric substitution: π‘ = βπ tan π
( 13 )
ππ‘ = βπ sec2 π ππ = βπ(1 + tan2 π )ππ
( 14 )
so that:
Thus, we may now write: 3
(1 β
ππ‘ π) β« (π+π‘ 2 )2
= (1 β
βπ sec2 π π) β« π2 (1+tan2 π )2 ππ
= (1 β
βπ sec2 π π) β« π2 (sec2 π )2 ππ
(βπβπ2 )
=
π2
sec2 π
β« sec4 π ππ
Henceforth: (1 β π) β«
ππ‘ 1 1 1 1 1 = ( 3/2 β ) β« ππ = ( 3/2 β ) β« cos 2 π ππ 2 2 2 (π + π‘ ) π sec π π βπ βπ
Using the identity: 1
1
cos2(π ) = 2 + 2 cos(2π )
( 15 )
we may write: (1 β π) β«
ππ‘ (π+π‘ 2 )2
=(
1 π3/2
β
1 1 1 ) β« { + cos(2π )} ππ π 2 2 β
=(
1 2π3/2
β
1 )π 2βπ
+(
1 4π3/2
β
1 ) sin(2π ) 4βπ
So that: β«
2π 2 ππ 2π 2 1 1 1 1 1 π‘ = {( 3/2 β ) π + ( 3/2 β ) sin(2π ) + tanβ1 } 2 2 (π + π cos π) (π β π) 2π 4π 2βπ 4βπ βπ βπ Page | 3
Since, from equation (13), we have: π = tanβ1
π‘ βπ
then, by trigonometry and use of the relationship sin(2π ) = 2 sin(π ) cos(π ), we have: sin 2π = 2 (
π‘
2βππ‘ βπ )( )= π + π‘2 βπ + π‘ 2 βπ + π‘ 2
such that: β«
2π2 ππ 2π2 1 1 π‘ 1 1 2βππ‘ 1 π‘ = {( β + ( 3/2 β + tanβ1 } ) tanβ1 )( 2) (π + π cos π)2 (π β π)2 2π3/2 2βπ π + π‘ 4π 4βπ βπ βπ βπ
or: β«
2π2 ππ 2π2 1βπ π‘ 1 β π 2βππ‘ 1 π‘ = {( ) tanβ1 + ( 3/2 ) ( )+ tanβ1 } 2 (π + π cos π)2 (π β π)2 2π3/2 π+π‘ βπ βπ βπ 4π
and, simplifying further, the above becomes: β«
2π2 ππ
=
(π + π cos π)2
(1 β π ) π‘ 2π2 π+1 π‘ {( 3/2 ) tanβ1 } + 2 (π β π ) 2π βπ 2π(π + π‘ 2 )
From equation (3): π‘ = tan
π 2
so: 2π2 ππ β« (π+π cos π)2
2π2
= (πβπ)2 {(
2π
Substituting in the value π = β«
ππ 2 1 (1+ cos π) 2 β
π+1
π+π πβπ
β1 ( 3/2 ) tan
1
π
βπ
tan ) + 2
π 2 π 2π(π+tan2 ) 2
(1βπ) tan
}
( 16 )
+πΆ
( 17 )
, where π = β2 and π = 1, we get: π
2β2sin(π)
= 4β2tanβ1 [(β2 β 1)tan ( 2 )] β 2+
β2cos(π)
However, at π = 0, we note that the integral, β«
dΟ 2 1 (1+ cos Ο) 2 β
is equal to a multiple of π,
or: β«
dΟ 2 1 (1 + cos π) β2
=ππ+πΆ
But, if π = 0, indicating the starting point on the ellipse of 0 radians, then πΆ = 0. This means that the integral must be solely equal to π π, which leaves us to conclude that:
Page | 4
ππ
β« (1 +
1 cos π) β2
2
π 2β2sin(π) = 4β2tanβ1 [(β2 β 1)tan ( )] β + ππ 2 2 + β2cos(π)
If, instead, we simply work out the integral in equation (17), between the limits of π = 0 and π = 2π, we adopt the following procedure: 2π
π
ππ
β«
2 1 (1 + cos π) β2
0
=4
[4β2tanβ1 [(β2
π π/2 2β2sin(π) ] β 1)tan ( )]] β 2[ 2 βπ/2 2 + β2cos(π)
βπ
Note that we have changed the limits in each of the above terms, since we need to ensure β according to the law of areas, the rules of contour integration, and other π analytic reasons associated with discontinuities at π = β that the symmetry of the 2
ellipse is preserved. Thus, we have: 2π
ππ
β« 0
(1 +
2 1 cos π) β2
π π = 4 [4β2tan-1 [(β2 β 1)tan ( )] β 4 [(β2 β 1)tan (β )]] β 2[0 β 0] 4 4
2π
ππ
β« 0
(1 +
2 1 cos π) β2
π π = 4 [4β2tan-1 [(β2 β 1)tan ( )] + 4β2tan-1 [(β2 β 1)tan ( )]] 4 4 β 2[0 β 0] 2π
ππ
β« 0
(1 +
1 cos π) β2
2
π = 32β2 ( ) 8
or: 2π
ππ
β«
2 1 (1 + cos π) β2
0
= 4β2π
Since we know from equation (1) that: 2π
β«0
2π
ππ
= β«0
2 1 (1+ cos π) β2
π 4
2ππ 2
(β2+1 cos π)
= β«0
π02
πΊππ0
β
2
ππ‘
( 18 )
then: 4β2π =
4 πΊππ0 β π 2 π02
So, Keplerβs Third Law becomes: Page | 5
π03 =
πΊπ 2 π 4π 2
Note that we directly substituted angular values for π into equation (18), and not the relationship, π = π +
3π 4
. This does not matter, as the result is still exactly the same,
whether one does so or not. Had we chosen to substitute π = π +
3π 4
at that point,
there would simply have been more tedious and protracted algebra to negotiate in accomplishing the same result of Keplerβs Third Law.
Page | 6