Rabia Javed , Muhammad Zia , Muhammad Usman ...

1 downloads 0 Views 2MB Size Report
Effect of ZnO and CuO Nanoparticles on Physiology, Steviol Glycosides and Antioxidant Activities in Invitro Grown Shoots of. Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni.
Effect of ZnO and CuO Nanoparticles on Physiology, Steviol Glycosides and Antioxidant Activities in Invitro Grown Shoots of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni 1,2,4

Rabia Javed

2

3

5

, Muhammad Zia , Muhammad Usman , Buhara Yucesan , Ekrem Gurel

1

2

4 3

Department of Multidisciplinary Studies, National University, of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi 46000, Pakistan Department of Biotechnology, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad 45320, Pakistan Department of Physics, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad 45320 , 4 5 Pakistan Department of Biology, Abant Izzet Baysel University , Bolu 14030, Turkey Department of Seed Science and Technology, Abant Izzet Baysel University, Bolu 14030, Turkey

Introduction

Materials & Methods

This study describes the effect of various concentrations (0, 0.1, 1.0, 10, 100 or 1000 mg/L) of ZnO (34 nm in size) and CuO (47 nm in size) nanoparticles on the physiological parameters, steviol glycosides (rebaudioside A and stevioside) content, and antioxidant

ZnO and CuO nanoparticles were synthesized by co-precipitation meth-

activities in tissue culture grown shoots of zero calorie highly valuable medicinal plant, Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. In recent years,

od and characterized by:

the studies encompassing field of nanotechnology for determination of effects of environmental stress on plant physiology and bio-



chemistry have been finding a fast pace. Metallic oxide nanoparticles, specifically nano-scale ZnO and CuO have gained paramount 

importance in this regard. These nanoparticles possess dynamic properties because of which these are employed to nodal explants to 

examine their potential effect on growth and secondary metabolites production of Stevia rebaudiana.



X-ray diffraction (XRD) Fourier transform infra-red spectroscopy (FTIR) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) Electron dispersive x-ray (EDX)

Shoot nodal explants of Stevia rebaudiana undergo direct shoot organogenesis in MS medium containing ZnO and CuO nanoparticles that cre-

Results

ate oxidative pressure. The physiological parameters are measured, and ZnLa

15

9

Error

C

6.1

1.26

O

24.54

0.43

Zn

64.91

0.93

Pd

1.35

0.15

Au

3.1

0.24

Total

100

the quantity of steviol glycosides (rebaudioside A and stevioside) is de-

ZnO

Microplate reader

0

1

ZnKa

2

ZnKb

0

Pd

Au

3

termined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Nonenzymatic antioxidant activities, i.e., total phenolic content (TPC), total

6 C OKa ZnL1

CPS/eV

12

Element Wt%

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

flavonoid content (TFC), total antioxidant capacity (TAC), total reducing

SEM

10

power (TRP) and DPPH-free radical scavenging activity are estimated

Energy (keV )

using microplate reader.

HPLC XRD and FTIR of ZnO nanoparticles

XRD and FTIR of CuO nanoparticles SEM of ZnO nanoparticles

SEM of CuO nanoparticles

EDX of ZnO and CuO nanoparticles

Conclusion Summing up, ZnO and CuO nanoparticles can be applied in invitro batch cultures of Stevia rebaudiana containing up to 1 mg/L and 10 mg/L of concentration, respectively. In this way, large quantity of secondary metabolites are obtained in bioreactors. Phytotoxic effects of ZnO and CuO nanoparticles appear once this threshold is achieved, and significantly highest level of phtotoxicity is exhibited at 1000 mg/L concentration. The phytotoxic effect is due to the excessive accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). This research opens new avenues for studying the fate of nanoparticles in the medicinal plants in context of their uptake, translocation and alteration of metabolic pathways in a concentration-dependent manner.

HPLC results of CuO nanoparticles

HPLC results of ZnO nanoparticles

References 





Physiology results of ZnO nanoparticles Conc. of ZnO TPC TFC nanoparticles (µg QE/mg) (µg GAE/mg) (ppm) Control 3.81±0.07d 4.52±0.03b 0.1 5.42±0.02b 4.54±0.02b

Physiology results of CuO nanoparticles

TAC(µg AAE/mg)

TRP(µg AAE/mg)

% DPPH inhibition

9.84±0.01c 10.8±0.01b

8.28±0.02c 8.63±0.02b

60.6 66.7



Conc. of CuO nanoparticles (ppm) Control 0.1

TPC (µg GAE/ mg)

TFC (µg QE/ mg)

TAC (µg TRP(µg % DPPH AAE/mg) AAE/mg) Inhibition

4.5±0.0c 4.6±0.0c

3.8±0.0d 6.3±0.0b

10.4±0.0b 10.9±0.0b

10.5±0.0c 10.7±0.0b

60.6 66.7

1.0 10

a

6.22±0.03 3.94±0.01c

a

4.67±0.03 4.24±0.05c

a

11.7±0.02 10.9±0.03b

a

10.3±0.01 10.3±0.01a

68.6 74.8

1.0 10

5.6±0.0b 6.2±0.0a

6.3±0.0b 7.5±0.0a

11.5±0.0a 11.9±0.0a

10.8±0.0b 11.5±0.0a

68.6 74.8

100

2.56±0.01e

3.01±0.01d

7.36±0.01d

9.99±0.04a

64.2

f

e

e

d

100

4.1±0.0d

5.7±0.0c

9.52±0.0c 10.6±0.0bc

64.2

59.5

1000

3.9±0.0e 2.1±0.0e 9.16±0.0d 10.3±0.0d Phytochemical results of CuO nanoparticles

58.5

1000

1.36±0.01

2.33±0.04

4.62±0.05

6.33±0.03

Phytochemical results of ZnO nanoparticles



Aslani, F., Bagheri, S., Muhd Julkapli, N., Juraimi, A.S., Hashemi, F.S.G., Baghdadi, A., 2014. Effects of Engineered Nanomaterials on Plants Growth: An Overview. The Scientific World Journal 28. Da Costa, M.V.J., Sharma, P.K., 2016. Effect of copper oxide nanoparticles on growth, morphology, photosynthesis, and antioxidant response in Oryza sativa. Photosynthetica 54, 110-119. Dimkpa, C.O., McLean, J.E., Latta, D.E., Manangón, E., Britt, D.W., Johnson, W.P., Boyanov, M.I., Anderson, A.J., 2012. CuO and ZnO nanoparticles: Phytotoxicity, metal speciation and induction of oxidative stress in sand-grown wheat. J. Nanopart. Res. 14. López-Moreno, M.L., de la Rosa, G., Hernández-Viezcas, J.A., Castillo-Michel, H., Botez, C.E., Peralta-Videa, J.R., Gardea-Torresdey, J.L., 2010. Evidence of the differential biotransformation and genotoxicity of ZnO and CeO2 nanoparticles on soybean (Glycine max) plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 73157320. Perreault, F., Samadani, M., Dewez, D., 2014. Effect of soluble copper released from copper oxide nanoparticles solubilisation on growth and photosynthetic processes of Lemna gibba L. Nanotoxicol. 8, 374-382.

Acknowledgement Authors are highly indebted to TUBITAK fellowship (program # 2216) for providing the funds, and Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan and Abant Izzet Baysel University, Bolu, Turkey for providing all the research facilities to perform this work.