âSpace weatherâ concept: stp/prediction & sw/user/forecast. ⢠Workshops on. AI Applications in Solar-Terrestrial Physics. ⢠Artificial neural networks - Hybrids.
Real-time space weather forecasts based on neural networks
Henrik Lundstedt and Peter Wintoft Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Lund, Sweden Yurdanur Tulunay and Ersin Tulunay Middle East Technical University, Ankara/Turkey
Outline
• “Space weather” concept: stp/prediction & sw/user/forecast • Workshops on AI Applications in Solar-Terrestrial Physics • Artificial neural networks - Hybrids • Developed solar-terrestrial physics predictions • Operational forcast space weather service for users
Space weather concept Its origin and use • “Space weather” was first mentioned in NASA Technical Document 62-206, 1962. (i.e. by engineers)
Definition IRF-Lund uses
• US Air Force started to use it in 1970
• Prediction within STP
• Scientists Bob McPherron & John Freeman claim they “coined it” in late 1980!
• Forecasting within space weather operational services for users
• In late 1980 power companies (user) contact us in Sweden on space weather forecasts. • NSF/NSWP definition 1995, Report of the Assessment Committee for the NSWP FCM-R24, 2006: (LWS,Heliophysics RM 2035) (CISM,Transitioning scientific STP models into operational tools ≈10 years ahead) • Space weather activities at ESA starts in 1995 i.e. more that 10 years ago. (SWprogramme, SDAs..), EU/COST724…
Workshops arranged by IRF-Lund
Workshops on ”Artificial Intelligence Applications in Solar-Terrestrial Physics” were held in Lund 1993 and 1997. A third workshop: Solar Activity: Exploration, Understanding and Prediction was held in September 19-21, 2005
Artificial neural networks MLBP Neural networks differ by how the neurons (process units) work, how the neurons are connected (topology) and by which learning algorithm that has been chosen.
Elman recurrent neural network Download Lund Dst model in Java and Matlab
Self Organizing Maps
Synoptic field structures were clasified using SOM Structures in solar wind, related to CMEs and CH were clasified with SOM
Neurofuzzy prediction A. Gholipour et al., 2005
Outline
Solar-Terrestrial Physics Predictions Input parameters
Output
KBNM method
Reference
Daily sunspot number
Daily sunspot number
SOM and MLP
Liszka 93;97
Monthly sunspot number
Date of solar cycle max and amplitude
MLP and Elman, Neurofuzzy
Macpherson et al., 95, Conway et al, 98 Maris&Oncica, 06, Gholipour, 05
Monthly sunspot number and aa Date of solar cycle max and amplitude
Elman
Ashmall and Moore, 98
Yearly sunspot number
Date of solar cycle max and amplitude
MLP
Calvo et al., 95
McIntosh sunspot class & MW magn complex.
X class solar flare
MLP expert system
Bradshaw et al., 89
Flare location, duration X-ray and radio flux;X-ray flux
Proton events
MLP, Neurofuzzy
Xue et al., 97; Gabriel et al., 00, Tulunay et al 07
Photospheric magnetic field expansion factor
Solar wind velocity 1-3 days ahead
RBF, PFM MHD
Wintoft & Lundstedt 97;99
Photospheric magnetic synoptic field
Solar magnetic total flux
MLB
Lundstedt et al., 07
Solar-Terrestrial Physics Predictions Input parameters
Output
KBNM method
Reference
Solar wind n, V, Bz
Relativistic electrons in Earth magnetosphere hour ahead
MLP
Wintoft and Lundstedt, 00
Solar wind n,V, Bz, Dst
Relativistic electrons one hour ahead
MLP, MHD, MSFM
Freeman et al., 93
ΣKp
Relativistic electrons day ahead
MLP
Stringer and McPherron, 93
Solar wind V from photospheric B
Daily geomagnetic Ap index
MLP
Detman et al., 00
Ap index
Ap index
MLP
Thompson, 93
Solar wind n, V, Bz
Kp index 3 hours ahead MLP
Boberg et al., 00
Solar wind n, V, B,Bz
Dst 1-8 hours ahead
MLP, Elman
Lundstedt, 91; Wu and Lundstedt, 97
Solar wind n, V, B,Bz
AE 1 hour ahead
Elman, MLP
Gleisner and Lundstedt,00 ,Gavrishchaka et al.,00, 01
Solar-Terrestrial Physics Prediction Input parametrs
Output
KBNM method
References
Solar wind V2Bs, (nV2)1/2, LT, local geomag Δxe, ΔYw
Local geomagnetic field ΔX, ΔY
MLP and RBF
Gleisner and Lundstedt 00
Solar wind n,V, Bz
None, weak or MLP strong aurora (NAO month ahead)
Lundstedt et al., 00 Boberg and Lundstedt 02,03
foF2
foF2 1 hour ahead
MLP
Wintoft and Lundstedt, 99
AE, local time, seasonal information
foF2 1-24 hours ahead
MLP
Wintoft and Cander, 00
MLP
Wintoft and Cander, 99
foF2, TEC, Ap, F10.7 24 hours ahead cm
Tulunay, E., Ozkaptan, C., 00. Tulunay, E., Senalp, E.T., Radicella, S.M., Tulunay, Y.,06
ΣKp
Satellite anomalies
MLP
Wintoft and Lundstedt 00
Solar wind n, V, Bz
dBx/dt, GIC
Elman, MLP
Kronfeldt et al., 01 and Weigel et al.,02
Transitioning Solar-Terrestrial Predictions into operational Space Weather Forecasts
Real-time space weather forecasts and warnings Scientific missions
Solar input data Ends ≈2011
Solar observations with SOHO make warnings 1-3 days ahead possible.
Solar wind observations with ACE make accurate forecasts 1-3 hours ahead possible.
ESA/Lund Space Weather Forecast Service Package
Latest information on forecasts of Kp, Dst, AE and GIC
ESA GIC Pilot Project Real-time predictions of GIC
Real-time forecasts of GIC November 7, 9 2004 events http://www.lund.irf.se/gicpilot/gicforecast/
NN Forecasts from British Geological Survey
Operation neural network space weather forecasts
•
Flare activity based vector magnetogram and NN (Aviation, polar flights, SDO)
• US Air Force MSM (Freeman) forecasts of magnetospheric conditions for satellites (NN Kp + MHD model) (satellites) • Daily Ap NN forecasts (BGS, UK) (Oil companies, power companies) • 3hr Kp NN forecasts (RWC-Sweden, Lund) (STP) • Dst NN forecasts (RWC-Sweden, Lund; RWC-Japan, Tokyo, NICT Space Environment Information Service) (STP) • GIC NN forecasts (RWC-Sweden, Lund) (Swedish power companies)
Coordinate the forecast service with ISES?
ISES Director: D. Boteler Deputy Director: H. Lundstedt Secr. for World days: H. Coffey Secr. Space Weather: J. Kunches WWW for Satellites: J. King