a loss of 28% of its forests between 1985 and 1999 (Kinnaird et al. 2003). Since then, encroachment .... *HB = head-and-body. Masked Palm Civet, the species ...
ǡ ǡ Jennifer L. MCCARTHY1 and Todd K. FULLER2
Sumatra is home to numerous small carnivore species, yet there is little information on their status and ecology. A camera-‐ trapping (1,636 camera-‐trap-‐nights) and live-‐trapping (1,265 trap nights) study of small cats (Felidae) in Bukit Barisan Selatan National Park recorded six small carnivore species: Masked Palm Civet Paguma larvata, Banded Civet Hemigalus derbyanus, Sumatran Hog Badger
, Yellow-‐throated Marten ϔ, Banded Linsang Prionodon linsang and Sunda Stink-‐badger Mydaus javanensisǤϐȋȌ
Ǥ
Ǧ effort, photo encounters for several of these species were few, despite their IUCN Red List status as Least Concern. This supports the need for current and comprehensive studies to assess the status of these species on Sumatra. Keywords:
, camera-‐trapping, Hemigalus derbyanus, ϔ, Mydaus javanensis, Paguma larvata, Pri- onodon linsang
ǡǡ Sumatera merupakan rumah bagi berbagai spesies karnivora berukuran kecil, namun informasi mengenai status dan ekologi spesies-‐spesies ini masih sedikit. Suatu studi mengenai kucing berukuran kecil (Felidae) menggunakan kamera penjebak dan perangkap hidup di Taman Nasional Bukit Barisan Selatan (1626 hari rekam) mencatat enam spesies karnivora kecil, yaitu: musang galing Paguma larvata, musang tekalong Hemigalus derbyanus, pulusan
, musang leher kuning Martes ϔ, linsang Prionodon linsang, dan sigung Mydaus javanensis. Tercatat juga satu spesies berang-‐berang yang tidak teriden-‐ ϐǤ
ǡǦǡ status mereka sebagai Least Concern. Ini mendukung perlunya studi saat ini dan studi menyeluruh untuk menilai status spesies-‐ spesies ini di Sumatera.
Sumatra harbours high mammal diversity (Rhee et al. 2004, Schipper et al. 2008), but deforestation and habitat degrada-‐ tion continue at unprecedented rates, with over 3.1 million hectares of forest (roughly 36% of Sumatra’s forested area) lost from 2000 to 2008 (Broich et al. 2011). A two-‐year mora-‐ torium on new agriculture and logging concessions by the ʹͲͳͲϐ
it appears that high rates of deforestation continue in many areas (Sloan et al. 2012). Sumatra is home to numerous small carnivore species. Schreiber ǤȋͳͻͺͻȌϐ for small carnivore conservation. Yet there have been few stud-‐ ies of small carnivores on Sumatra and little is known of each species’s status on the island (Holden 2006). A live-‐trapping and camera-‐trapping study of small cats (Felidae) obtained photographs of other small carnivores and trapped some in-‐ dividuals. These data, presented here, contribute to the sparse information on small carnivores on Sumatra.
some of the island’s last protected lowland forests, the park has been inundated by illegal logging and agriculture, causing a loss of 28% of its forests between 1985 and 1999 (Kinnaird et al. 2003). Since then, encroachment has decreased in some areas, but remains a problem in others. The present study fo-‐
This study was conducted in Bukit Barisan Selatan National Park (NP) in southern Sumatra (Fig. 1). Bukit Barisan Selatan NP is the third largest protected area in Sumatra and is bor-‐
ϐǤ
Fig. 1.ƵŬŝƚĂƌŝƐĂŶ^ĞůĂƚĂŶEĂƟŽŶĂůWĂƌŬŝŶƐŽƵƚŚĞƌŶ^ƵŵĂƚƌĂ͕/ŶĚŽŶĞƐŝĂ͘
59 Small Carnivore Conservation, Vol. 51: 59–63, December 2014
McCarthy & Fuller cused in the east-‐central region of the park, outside the small village of Talang Lima (5°06′33″S, 104°09′01″E). Despite some encroachment into this area of the park, a sharp ridgeline west of the village limited coffee plantations to lower elevations. A largely untouched primary evergreen forest remains at the top of the ridge (1,089 m). This ridge, down to 800 m, was the location of all the study’s camera-‐trapping and live-‐trapping. No trapping was conducted outside the park or in non-‐forest-‐ ed areas. The rough topography consists of sharp, secondary ridges descending perpendicularly from the primary ridgeline. There is no vehicular access into this forest and few trails, although there is some evidence of limited human activity inside the park boundaries. This study was initiated to assess the ecology and status of small cats within the park. It used both camera-‐trapping and live-‐trapping (McCarthy 2013, McCarthy et al. 2015). Most of the camera-‐trapping was conducted from January to September 2011, with a methodology following O’Brien et al. (2003). A sampling block was designated and divided into 20 subunits each of 1 km2. Camera-‐traps (Reconyx HC500) were placed within 100 m of randomly chosen UTM coordinate in-‐ side each subunit along a large animal trail, or in an area with sign of recent mammal activity. Four camera-‐traps had been set opportunistically within the sampling block during 2010 to assess potential live-‐trapping sites and camera perfor-‐ mance. All camera-‐traps were mounted on tree trunks so that
ʹͷ
ϐǤ They were baited with commercial lure (Hawbakers Wild Cat Lures Number One and Two) and chicken meat. Camera-‐traps were programmed to operate continuously and to take a series ϐǡͲ
between sequential triggers. Each photograph of an animal ϐ
Ǥ ϐ
Ǥ ϐ
ǡ-‐
͵Ͳϐ not considered a new event. Live-‐trapping from November 2008 to February 2009 deployed 23 size 1 and 1½ soft-‐catch foot hold traps (Oneida Victor) opportunistically within the camera-‐trapping block.
ϐ
tension in an effort to decrease the likelihood of catching small animals such as murids or birds. Traps used the same attract-‐ ants as the camera-‐traps and were placed directly on well-‐ travelled game trails and at spots with cat signs. The traps were staked into the ground using cable stakes (Finned Super Stakes) and were concealed with torn leaves. Traps were man-‐ ually checked twice daily. Captured animals were anaesthe-‐ tised by a veterinarian, then removed from the trap and given a full physical examination. Morphological information was recorded for all individuals, which were then monitored until fully recovered.
(a)
;ďͿ
(c)
(d)
Fig. 2.&ŽƵƌƐŵĂůůĐĂƌŶŝǀŽƌĞƐƉĞĐŝĞƐĐĂŵĞƌĂͲƚƌĂƉƉĞĚŝŶdĂůĂŶŐ>ŝŵĂ͕ƵŬŝƚĂƌŝƐĂŶ^ĞůĂƚĂŶEĂƟŽŶĂůWĂƌŬ͕ƐŽƵƚŚĞƌŶ^ƵŵĂƚƌĂ͕ϮϬϭϬʹϮϬϭϭ͗;ĂͿĂŶĚĞĚ Civet Hemigalus derbyanus͕ϴ&ĞďƌƵĂƌLJϮϬϭϭ͖;ďͿ^ƵŵĂƚƌĂŶ,ŽŐĂĚŐĞƌArctonyx hoevenii͕ϭϲƵŐƵƐƚϮϬϭϭ͖;ĐͿ^ƵŶĚĂ^ƟŶŬͲďĂĚŐĞƌMydaus javanensis, ϲ^ĞƉƚĞŵďĞƌϮϬϭϬ͖;ĚͿDĂƐŬĞĚWĂůŵŝǀĞƚPaguma larvata͕ϵ&ĞďƌƵĂƌLJϮϬϭϭ͘
Small Carnivore Conservation, Vol. 51, December 2014
60
ǡ Table 1.ĂŵĞƌĂͲƚƌĂƉƉŚŽƚŽŐƌĂƉŚƌĂƚĞƐŽĨƐŵĂůůĐĂƌŶŝǀŽƌĞƐŝŶdĂůĂŶŐ>ŝŵĂ͕ƵŬŝƚĂƌŝƐĂŶ^ĞůĂƚĂŶEĂƟŽŶĂůWĂƌŬ͕ Sumatra, Indonesia. EƵŵďĞƌŽĨŶŽƟŽŶĂůůLJ ŝŶĚĞƉĞŶĚĞŶƚƉŚŽƚŽƐ;EͿ 17 12 3 2 2 *
Species Masked Palm Civet Paguma larvata Banded Civet Hemigalus derbyanus Sumatran Hog Badger Arctonyx hoevenii Yellow-‐throated MartenDĂƌƚĞƐŇĂǀŝŐƵůĂ Banded Linsang Prionodon linsang ^ƵŶĚĂ^ƟŶŬͲďĂĚŐĞƌ Mydaus javanensis *camera-‐trapped only during the 2010 pilot phase.
WŚŽƚŽƌĂƚĞ;EͬϭϬϬ ĐĂŵĞƌĂͲƚƌĂƉͲŶŝŐŚƚƐͿ 1.04 0.73 0.18 0.12 0.12 *
A total of 1,636 camera-‐trap-‐nights during 2011 photographed ϐ
ȋ Ǥ ʹȌǤ
highest for Masked Palm Civet Paguma larvata and Banded Civet Hemigalus derbyanus, but substantially lower for Suma-‐ tran Hog Badger
, Yellow-‐throated Marten ϔ and Banded Linsang (Table 1). One additional species, Sunda Stink-‐badger Mydaus javanensis, was camera-‐
trapped only during the 2010 pilot phase. All six species are categorised on
(IUCN 2014) as Least Concern except Banded Civet (Vulnerable) and Sumatran Hog Badger (Not Recognised). Live-‐trapping for a to-‐ tal of 1,265 trap nights captured four small carnivore species (Table 2, Fig. 3): three Masked Palm Civets, one Yellow-‐throat-‐ ǡϐ-‐ ǡ
Ǥϐ had several ticks, but were in excellent condition otherwise.
(a)
;ďͿ
(c) Fig. 3.^ŵĂůůĐĂƌŶŝǀŽƌĞƐƉĞĐŝĞƐůŝǀĞͲƚƌĂƉƉĞĚŝŶdĂůĂŶŐ>ŝŵĂ͕ƵŬŝƚĂƌŝƐĂŶ^ĞůĂƚĂŶEĂƟŽŶĂůWĂƌŬ͕ƐŽƵƚŚĞƌŶ^ƵŵĂƚƌĂ͕/ŶĚŽŶĞƐŝĂ͕EŽǀĞŵďĞƌϮϬϬϴʹ&ĞďƌƵĂƌLJ 2009: (a) Sumatran Hog Badger Arctonyx hoevenii͖;ďͿzĞůůŽǁͲƚŚƌŽĂƚĞĚDĂƌƚĞŶDĂƌƚĞƐŇĂǀŝŐƵůĂ; (c) Masked Palm Civet Paguma larvata.
61
Small Carnivore Conservation, Vol. 51, December 2014
McCarthy & Fuller Table 2. ^ŵĂůů ĐĂƌŶŝǀŽƌĞƐ ĐĂƉƚƵƌĞĚ ŝŶ ůŝǀĞͲƚƌĂƉƐ ŝŶ dĂůĂŶŐ >ŝŵĂ͕ ƵŬŝƚ ĂƌŝƐĂŶ ^ĞůĂƚĂŶ EĂƟŽŶĂů WĂƌŬ͕ ^ƵŵĂƚƌĂ͕ Indonesia. Species Masked Palm Civet Masked Palm Civet Masked Palm Civet Yellow-‐throated Marten Sumatran Hog Badger KƩĞƌ
Sex
Age
tĞŝŐŚƚ ;ŬŐͿ
,ΎůĞŶŐƚŚ ;ĐŵͿ
dĂŝůůĞŶŐƚŚ ;ĐŵͿ
WĂǁǁŝĚƚŚ ;ĐŵͿ
Female Male Male Male Male -‐
Adult Adult ^ƵďĂĚƵůƚ Adult Adult -‐
4.25 5.40 2.47 2.78 5.42 -‐
68 80 52 61 71 -‐
56 58 43 41 17 -‐
3 4 -‐ 3.5 5 -‐
*HB =ŚĞĂĚͲĂŶĚͲďŽĚLJ͘
Masked Palm Civet, the species encountered most fre-‐ quently by both camera-‐trap and live-‐trap, is thought to be fairly common in central Sumatra (Holden 2006). These high trapping rates suggest that it is fairly common in the Talang Lima study area. However, threats to the species on Suma-‐ ϐǤ species in Indonesia, making trade technically illegal, but it is traded in northern Sumatra, with the exact amount of harvest and trade unknown (Shepherd 2008). The species uses a wide variety of habitats in China (Wang & Fuller 2003), but with no ǡ
ϐ
habitat alteration there are unknown. Banded Civet was camera-‐trapped relatively frequently. Al-‐ though none was live-‐trapped, it was photographed through-‐ out the Talang Lima study area and seemed common. In Ker-‐ inci Seblat NP, central Sumatra, Holden (2006) found it only in primary lowland forests; but in this part of Bukit Barisan Selatan NP it was photographed up to over 1,000 m asl. Re-‐ duction of primary forest is thought to be the main threat to this species, although its present status on Sumatra is barely documented. Sumatran Hog Badger was photographed thrice and cap-‐ tured once. Holden (2006) recorded it frequently in Kerinci Seblat NP, concluding that it was common at elevations higher than those covered in the present survey. However, it is con-‐ sidered rare in other areas of Sumatra, so might be distributed patchily (Holden 2006). Yellow-‐throated Marten was recorded frequently by Holden (2006) in Kerinci Seblat NP. In Talang Lima it was photographed twice and captured once. The survey area, at 800–1,089 m, lies right at the lower edge of the altitu-‐ dinal range proposed for the species by Helgen et al. (2008). Banded Linsang and Sunda Stink-‐badger were recorded only by camera-‐trap. The linsang was recorded twice. It was also recorded infrequently by Holden (2006) and although camera-‐trapped widely across its range, it is rarely among the commonly encountered species (e.g. Hedges Ǥ 2013). Sun-‐ da Stink-‐badger, recorded only once, was not camera-‐trapped by Holden (2006), although one was directly observed. In Bor-‐ neo Payne et al. (1985) recorded the species mostly in second-‐ ary forest, which may contribute to the low photograph rate for this species in the Talang Lima study area, located in pri-‐ mary forest. A Malay Weasel Mustela nudipes was sighted along the side of a large mammal trail in lowland secondary forest near the Way Canguk Research Station, but neither it nor In-‐ donesian Mountain Weasel Ǥ were recorded in Small Carnivore Conservation, Vol. 51, December 2014
62
the Talang Lima study area: Malay Weasel is rarely camera-‐ trapped even when present (Ross et al. 2013) and Talang Lima lies at lower altitude than all records of Indonesian Mountain Weasel traced by Meiri et al. (2007). No otter species or Otter Civets Cynogale bennettii were camera-‐trapped, although sta-‐ tions were not selected to represent riverine habitats. Holden (2006) did not record mongooses Herpestes, Small Indian Civ-‐ et
, Malay Civet or Com-‐ mon Palm Civet Paradoxurus hermaphroditus in Kerinci Seblat NP’s forest, nor were any of those species recorded in Talang Lima. With all survey located in primary forest within the park, their presence locally but in other habitats is possible. Neither Binturong
nor Small-‐toothed Palm Civet were recorded, although this might ϐ
Ǥ The ecology and status of most Sumatran small carni-‐ vores remain largely undocumented. The rapid deforestation on the island is presumably detrimental to forest-‐dependent species. Small carnivores are harvested, although the extent and effects on each species are unknown. This study encoun-‐ tered some species categorised as Least Concern only rarely, raising the question of their status on Sumatra. Although this study was limited to a single small area, it highlights the neces-‐ sity of attaining current information on small carnivore status in Sumatra.
This study was supported by the Wildlife Conservation Society-‐In-‐ donesia Program, the Mohammed bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund, Panthera, The Clouded Leopard Project, the University of Dela-‐ ware, the Small Cat Conservation Fund, the Cat Action Treasury and Idea Wild. It was undertaken with the cooperation of the University of Lampung, the staff of Bukit Barisan Selatan NP, the Indonesian Ministry of Research and Technology and the Indonesian Ministry of Ǥϐǡǡ the many others who helped set camera-‐traps in the midst of often challenging conditions. Hariyo Wibisono reviewed the translation into Indonesian.
Broich, M., Hansen, M., Stolle, F., Potapov, P., Margono, B. A. & Adusei, B. 2011. Remotely sensed forest cover loss shows high spatial and temporal variation across Sumatera and Kalimantan, Indonesia 2000–2008. Environmental Research Letters 6(1): (014010) 1–9. Hedges, L., Clements, G. R., Aziz, S. A., Yap, W., Laurance, S., Goosem, M. & Laurance, W. F. 2013. Small carnivore records from a threatened
ǡ habitat linkage in Terengganu, Peninsular Malaysia. Small Carni- vore Conservation 49: 9–14. Helgen, K. M., Lim, N. T. L. & Helgen, L. E. 2008. The hog-‐badger is not an edentate: systematics and evolution of the genus
(Mammalia: Mustelidae).
- ety 154: 353–385. Holden, J. 2006. Small carnivores in Sumatra. Small Carnivore Conser- vation 34&35: 34–38. IUCN 2014.
. Version 2014.2. . Downloaded on 15 October 2014. Kinnaird, M. F., Sanderson, E. W., O’Brien, T. G., Wibisono, H. T. & Wool-‐ mer, G. 2003. Deforestation trends in a tropical landscape and implications for endangered large mammals. Conservation Biol- ogy 17: 245–257. McCarthy, J. L. 2013.
ǡǡ . University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massahusetts, U.S.A. (Ph.D. dissertation). McCarthy, J. L., Wibisono, H. T., McCarthy, K. P., Fuller, T. K. & Andayani, N. 2015. Assessing the distribution and habitat use of four felid species in Bukit Barisan Selatan National Park, Sumatra, Indo-‐ nesia. Global Ecology and Conservation 3: 210–221. Meiri, S., Duckworth, J. W. & Meijaard, E. 2007. Biogeography of Indo-‐ nesian Mountain Weasel Mustela lutreolina and a newly discov-‐ ered specimen. Small Carnivore Conservation 37: 1–5. O’Brien, T. G., Kinnaird, M. F. & Wibisono, H. T. 2003. Crouching Tigers, hidden prey: Sumatran Tiger and prey populations in a tropical forest landscape. 6: 131–139. Payne, J., Francis, C. M. & Phillipps, K. 1985. ϔ- Ǥ The Sabah Society with WWF Malaysia, Kota Kinabalu and Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Rhee, S., Kitchener, D., Brown, T., Merrill, R., Dilts, R. & Tighe, S. 2004.
. Prepared for USAID/Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia. Ross, J., Hearn, A. J. & Macdonald, D. W. 2013. Recent camera-‐trap re-‐ cords of Malay Weasel Mustela nudipes in Sabah, Malaysian Bor-‐ neo. Small Carnivore Conservation 49: 20–24. Schipper, J. et al. [132 authors] 2008. The status of the world’s land and marine mammals: diversity, threat, and knowledge. Science 322: 225–230. Schreiber, A., Wirth, R., Riffel, M. & Van Rompaey, H. 1989. ǡ
ǡǡǤ
- . IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. Shepherd, C. R. 2008. Civets in trade in Medan, North Sumatra, Indo-‐ nesia (1997–2001) with notes on legal protection. Small Carni- vore Conservation 38: 34–36. Sloan, S., Edwards, D. P. & Laurance, W. F. 2012. Does Indonesia’s REDD+ moratorium on new concessions spare imminently threatened forests? Conservation Letters 5: 222–231. Wang, H. & Fuller, T. K. 2003. Food habits of four sympatric carnivores in southeastern China. Mammalia 67: 513–520.
ǡ
Ȃ ǡǡͳͻͺͲͳǡǤǤǤ ǣ
̷Ǥ
ʹ
ǡ ǡͳͲǡ ǡ
ͲͳͲͲ͵ǡǤǤǤ 1
63
Small Carnivore Conservation, Vol. 51, December 2014