Reframing the Context of Preventive Health Care Services and ...

FRAMING HEALTH MATTERS

Reframing the Context of Preventive Health Care Services and Prevention of HIV and Other Sexually Transmitted Infections for Young Men: New Opportunities to Reduce Racial/Ethnic Sexual Health Disparities Yzette Lanier, PhD, and Madeline Y. Sutton, MD, MPH

Young Black males, aged 13 to 29 years, have the highest annual rates of HIV infections in the United States. Young Black men who have sex with men (MSM) are the only subgroup with significant increases in HIV incident infections in recent years. Black men, particularly MSM, are also disproportionately affected by other sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Therefore, we must strengthen HIV and STI prevention opportunities during routine, preventive health care visits and at other, nontraditional venues accessed by young men of color, with inclusive, nonjudgmental approaches. The Affordable Care Act and National HIV/ AIDS Strategy present new opportunities to reframe and strengthen sexual health promotion and HIV and STI prevention efforts with young men of color. (Am J Public Health. 2013;103:262–269. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2012.300921)

Periodic, preventive assessments are considered prime opportunities to provide screening, evaluation, and counseling for many health conditions, including HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs).1,2 Evidence is strong in support of periodic, preventive health visits for children of both sexes through age 12 years, girls and women aged 13 years and older, and men aged 40 years and older, during which time routine screenings and immunizations may occur.3---9 For young women, these preventive health visits are culturally accepted and provide important opportunities for sexual health discussions and screenings, usually during annual gynecological visits.1,5,6 Initial reproductive health visits and discussions are formally recommended by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists to begin with young women aged between 13 and 15 years.1,5 For young men, however, formal recommendations for routine, preventive sexual health visits do not yet exist. Yet, young men in this age group, especially young men who have sex with men (MSM), are disproportionately affected by preventable diseases, including HIV and other STIs.10---14 For young men of color, particularly Black and Hispanic men,

the burden of HIV and STIs is especially high compared with that of their White male peers.10---14 The absence of consistent, structured, timed, and provider-enforced national guidelines for preventive reproductive health care visits for young men aged 13 to 39 years decreases opportunities for screenings, evaluations, and counseling in support of HIV and STI prevention and improved sexual health. This remains a gap in our public health approach to improve sexual health and decrease our national burden of HIV and other STIs, particularly among young MSM. As adolescence and young adulthood can be times of sexual exploration and lack of disclosure regarding sexual identity and sexual behaviors,15 preventive sexual health discussions and services for young men should be sensitive and inclusive to ensure appropriate prevention coverage. We discuss the importance of increasing efforts to help define an optimal preventive sexual health care process for young men, and describe strategies to strengthen and improve sexual health access for young men that are also inclusive of and culturally appropriate for young MSM.

262 | Framing Health Matters | Peer Reviewed | Lanier and Sutton

HIV AND OTHER SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS AMONG YOUNG BLACK MEN In the United States, an estimated 1.2 million men and women are living with HIV infection14; Blacks are disproportionately affected.11,13 Although constituting only 13% of the total US population,16 Blacks represent 52% of new diagnoses of HIV infection and the burden of disease rests most heavily on Black men, particularly MSM.10,11,14 An estimated 1 in 16 Black males will be diagnosed with HIV infection during his lifetime.17 Black men also rank first in number of new HIV diagnoses11,14; the primary transmission route is sexual transmission with more than 80% of incident HIV infections attributable to MSM, especially among men younger than 40 years.10,11,14 Among male adolescents, aged 15 to 19 years, a group at disproportionate risk for incident HIV infections, 3.6% to 4.6% report ever having had oral or anal sexual intercourse, or both, with a male partner.14,18 Blacks are also disproportionately affected by other STIs and account for 71% of all reported cases of gonorrhea and nearly half of all reported cases of chlamydia and syphilis.12 By gender, women have higher reported rates of both chlamydia and gonorrhea,12 but gender-based routine reproductive examinations and screening recommendations have long been recognized by providers for young, sexually active women and not men.12,18,19 When HIV and STI data for young men aged 13 to 39 years are reviewed by race, wide racial/ethnic disparities exist; rates are 9 to 20 times higher among Black young men compared with their White male peers (Table 1).10--13 Infectious syphilis disparities among men are largely accounted for by disproportionately

American Journal of Public Health | February 2013, Vol 103, No. 2


CURRENT RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ROUTINE PREVENTIVE HEALTH SCREENINGS

TABLE 1—Estimated Numbers of Cases and Rates for HIV and Sexually Transmitted Infections for Young Men by Race and Black–White Rate Ratio Disparities: United States, 2012 Non-Hispanic Black Young Men Non-Hispanic White Young Men Variable

Cases, No. b

Ratea

Cases, No.

Ratea

Black–White Rate Ratio

Diagnoses of HIV infection

13 555

82.9

7132

9.7

8.5

Gonorrheac

73 151

946.0

15 168

46.5

20.3

134 202 4172

1706.4 56.3

64 323 2005

194.7 6.3

8.7 8.9

Chlamydial infectionc Primary and secondary syphilisc a

Rate per 100 000 population. HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report10; data reported for ages 13–39 years. c Data reported from the Sexually Transmitted Diseases Surveillance Report,12 for ages 15–39 years. b

affected Black and Hispanic MSM (compared with White MSM) and young MSM aged 20 to 29 years.20 Social determinants, which include fewer jobs, increased poverty, disproportionate incarceration, fewer educational opportunities, stigma, homophobia, and concurrent sexual networks in some Black communities, provide a context for higher community burden of HIV and STIs and persistent racial/ethnic disparities; increasing routine HIV and STI screening and treatment efforts with young men, particularly young MSM, may have a great impact on these gaps.21,22 Still, barriers remain for young men to access preventive health care services and ensure HIV and STI screenings once accessed.23,24

CHALLENGES TO ACCESSING HEALTH CARE SERVICES FOR YOUNG MEN Adolescence and young adulthood are high-risk periods for sexual health challenges, such as HIV, STIs, and unintended pregnancy, as well as for being uninsured and lacking access to health care compared with older adults10---15,25---28; this underscores the importance of health care access and sexual health care service provision for young people of both sexes.27,29 Lack of health insurance, not having a usual source of medical care, and lacking a doctor visit in the past year all disproportionately affect young men compared with young women,29---33 and among men, Black and Hispanic young men are more

likely to be uninsured compared with White male peers. 34---36 Factors that contribute to men’s poor health-seeking behaviors and underutilization of health services include socially constructed notions of masculinity, homophobia, stigma regarding open discussions of sexuality and sexual health with health care providers, increasing preferences for accessing information online, and economic factors.37---43 Among those who do access services, discussion of reproductive health topics and HIV and STI screening by providers in clinical settings are as low as 14% among young men aged 18 years and older with a doctor’s visit in the past year. 24,44,45 Other policies contribute to the discrepant rates of preventive health screenings among men and women. Young women have longstanding recommendations for routine reproductive health visits,1,5---7 and these clinical visits often include preventive services such as sexual health discussions and HIV and STI testing. No equivalently enforced reproductive health visit recommendation exists for men.33,45 Strategies to shift the sexual health context for men should include at least 2 approaches: (1) adding sexual health prevention and screenings to existing recommendations for routine preventive health visits, and (2) identifying innovative, nontraditional approaches to offer sexual health discussions and HIV and STI screening to young men, especially young Black MSM who are disproportionately affected by HIV and other STIs and often difficult to access through traditional health care systems.38

February 2013, Vol 103, No. 2 | American Journal of Public Health

For young men, expert panels have made recommendations on the basis of available data or expert opinion; selected recommendations for men and nonpregnant women aged 13 to 39 years are summarized in Table 2 and grouped separately on the basis of recommendations for sexual health and chronic health conditions. The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) provides a highly referenced and respected set of clinical guidelines for preventive health services.6 The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), American College of Physicians, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (women only) also offer evidence-based recommendations for preventive clinical services for adults and adolescents.1,46---48 The American Academy of Pediatrics’ Bright Futures Initiative recommends routine STI screening for all sexually active adolescents aged 11 to 21 years, although reports of routine STI screening among young men in this age group remain low.49 In addition, the American Medical Association provides a set of recommendations for adolescents, aged 11 to 21 years (Guidelines for Adolescent Preventive Services), but some of these recommendations have limited supporting scientific evidence and are not widely implemented by providers. 50,51 Several differences are noted in the specifics of the HIV and STI recommendations included in Table 2. Regarding HIV screening, CDC has the broadest recommendation.46 However, the USPSTF strongly recommends HIV screening for adolescents and adults at increased risk for HIV infection, including MSM and men and women who have unprotected sexual intercourse with multiple partners (“A” recommendation), but evidence for the recommendations for routine, non---risk-based HIV testing is graded as a “C,” which has negative implications for HIV-screening reimbursement from health insurance providers.6,52 Routine HIV testing, with prompt linkage to care and treatment of those who test positive, remains an effective yet underutilized tool to prevent the further spread of HIV.53---55

Lanier and Sutton | Peer Reviewed | Framing Health Matters | 263


Syphilis

Gonorrhea

Chlamydia

HIV

screenings

Reproductive and sexual health

Screening

TB and STDs. Annual testing is recommended for all persons likely to be at high risk for HIV.a

individual basis, with high-risk individuals being tested more frequently. (Jan. 2009)

STDs. Annual testing is recommended for all persons likely to be at high risk for HIV.a (Sept. 2006)

and screening of older women with risk factors (e.g., those who have a

aged 24 y and younger and for older nonpregnant women who are at increased risk. (June 2007)

frequent screening (i.e., at 3–6 mo intervals) is indicated for MSM who engage in certain behaviors.b (Dec. 2010)

2010)

infection. (May 2005)

3–6 mo intervals) is indicated

(i.e., at 3–6 mo intervals) is certain behaviors.b (Dec. 2010)

indicated for MSM who engage in

MSM; more frequent screening

infection. (July 2004)

Recommends routine (annual) screening for all sexually active

behaviors.b (Dec. 2010)

for MSM who engage in certain

infection. (July 2004)

increased risk for syphilis

...

risk for infection. (Dec.

they are at increased risk for

frequent screening (i.e., at

Strongly recommends that clinicians screen persons at

aged < 25 y) at increased

gonorrhea infection only if

sexually active MSM; more

...

young women (i.e., those

sexually active women for

annually) screening for all

Recommends routine (at least

(Dec. 2010) Recommends screening of

multiple sexual partners). Recommends screening all

...

active women aged £ 25 y

nonpregnant young women

sexually active MSM; more

new sexual partner or

Recommends annual screening of all sexually

(Sept. 2006)

patients aged 13–64 y as well as all patients

care settings for all

Recommends screening for all sexually active

Recommends routine (at least annually) screening for all

at increased risk for syphilis

Strongly recommends that clinicians screen persons

...

...

...

initiating treatment of

risk for HIV infection. (July 2005)

repeat screening conducted, on an

13–64 y as well as all patients initiating treatment of TB and

risk for HIV infection. (July 2005)

and adults at increased

settings for all patients aged

and adults at increased

screening in all health

individuals and

screening in all health care screening all adolescents

Recommends routine

CDC46,47

Nonpregnant Women

Strongly recommends

USPSTF6

screening for all

ACP48

Recommends routine

Recommends routine

CDC46,47

Men

screening all adolescents

Strongly recommends

USPSTF6

TABLE 2—Selected Recommended Preventive Health Screenings for Men and Nonpregnant Women, Aged 13–39 Years: United States, 2012

...

...

(Jan. 2009)

Continued

tested more frequently.

individuals being

basis, with high-risk

screening conducted, on an individual

individuals and repeat

screening for all

Recommends routine

ACP48




from all their patients as well as offer STD and HIV prevention counseling. (Dec. 2010)

prevent STIs for all sexually active adolescents and for

adults and increased risk

heart disease. (June 2008) asymptomatic adults with sustained blood pressure greater than 135/80 mm Hg. (June 2008)

greater than 135/80 mm

Hg. (June 2008)

Recommends screening in

asymptomatic adults with sustained blood pressure

Recommends screening in

...

heart disease. (June 2008)

aged 20–35 y if they are at

...

increased risk for coronary

recommends screening men

increased risk for coronary

aged 20–45 y if they are at

men aged ‡ 35 y and

...

2007) Recommends screening women

...

(Dec. 2007) Strongly recommends screening

Recommends screening for

STIs. (Oct. 2008)

adults at increased risk for

prevent STIs for all sexually active adolescents and for

behavioral counseling to

Recommends high-intensity

adults aged ‡ 18 y. (Dec.

...

is feasible. (Jan. 2009)

reduce risky behaviors when such counseling

counsel patients to

Encourages clinicians to

adults aged 18 y and older.

Recommends screening for

...

to routinely obtain sexual histories

behavioral counseling to

for STIs. (Oct. 2008)

Encourages health care providers

Recommends high-intensity

...

...

...

counseling. (Dec. 2010)

offer STD and HIV prevention

obtain sexual histories from all their patients as well as

providers to routinely

Encourages health care

...

...

...

is feasible. (Jan. 2009)

reduce risky behaviors when such counseling

to counsel patients to

Encourages clinicians

Note. ACP = American College of Physicians; CDC = Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; MSM = men who have sex with men; STD = sexually transmitted disease; STI = sexually transmitted infection; TB = tuberculosis; USPSTF = United States Preventive Services Task Force. a Persons likely to be at high risk include injection drug users and their sexual partners, persons who exchange sexual intercourse for money or drugs, sexual partners of HIV-infected persons, and MSM or heterosexual persons who themselves or whose sexual partners have had > 1 sexual partner since their most recent HIV test. b More frequent screening is indicated for MSM who have multiple or anonymous partners, who have sexual intercourse in conjunction with illicit drug use (particularly methamphetamine use), or whose sexual partners participate in these activities.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Lipid disorders

Blood pressure

screenings

Chronic medical condition

STI counseling

TABLE 2—Continued


For STIs, CDC encourages routine sexual histories from all patients and STI prevention counseling,47 but lack of cultural and sexual competency, context, and comfort are barriers to open, effective provider---patient sexual history dialogue that can strengthen STI screening efforts.56 Current CDC recommendations are for young, sexually active men who self-identify as MSM to have routine STI screening, which leaves a gap in routine STI screening for non---gay-identified men having same-sex behaviors who are also at increased risk (Table 2).46,57 To combat racial/ethnic sexual health disparities for young men, it will be important to strengthen broad sexual health messages for all young men, including gay-identified and non---gay-identified MSM engaging in same-sex behaviors, as most STIs, including HIV, are asymptomatic and will be detected only by routine screening. The recommendations for sexual health and chronic medical condition screenings summarized in Table 2 represent missed and underutilized opportunities because of infrequent health care visits by young men and low delivery rates of preventive screenings by providers.18,29,58 Opportunities also exist to provide reproductive health services, including HIV and other STI screenings, during other pre-established, recommended health care visits (including preparticipation sports physicals, which currently lack a sexual health component). 59 For approximately 78% of high-school young men, preparticipation sports examinations serve as the only opportunity to receive a routine medical evaluation.59,60 As such, preparticipation sports examinations may be an optimal time and important opportunity to offer sexual health evaluations and nonjudgmental preventive sexual health discussions for young men.61,62 A pilot study among high-school athletes demonstrated the feasibility of urine-based STI screening during preparticipation sports physical examinations and that asymptomatic STIs were prevalent among both boys and girls.61

NEW OPPORTUNITIES TO INCREASE PREVENTION EFFORTS WITH YOUNG MEN

To turn the tide on HIV and STI disparities among young men, especially men of color and



MSM, innovative, effective, nontraditional strategies must also be considered to increase opportunities for routine sexual health discussions and HIV and other STI screenings. Recently, there has been growing advocacy to implement routine, annual sexual health examinations for young men, and health promotion approaches to improve outcomes have been suggested.33,63 Similar to the gynecological examination for women, this annual examination would assess men’s sexual and reproductive health and provide an opportunity for HIV and STI prevention and screening. Next steps should include more research to explore and validate the benefits of a periodic sexual health evaluation for the overall health of young men and their sexual partners. In addition, clear, congruent messages from family, communities, and providers with young men to break sexual silences and discuss preventive sexual health services and a timetable for the delivery of these services would be an important component of establishing a new culture of routine sexual health examinations and comfortable health dialogue for young men and their social networks. To support these efforts toward a normalized sexual health discussion for young men, federal, local, and professional organizations have crucial roles to play as part of a comprehensive, unified sexual public health effort that engages young men, including self-identified and nonidentified MSM of color. In addition, working with health care providers to reinforce the existing sexual health and chronic health recommendations can highlight their importance and strengthen the culture of routine health screenings for young men and their providers. Over time, providers would become more aware of the importance of routine sexual health so that they can do their part during clinical visits with young men, especially young men with same-sex behaviors, for improved HIV and other STI prevention efforts. Creating continuing education opportunities for physicians and nurses can serve as reminders of the importance of sexual health for young men. Establishing young men’s health report cards for clinics, hospitals, and community health centers is also an innovative approach for holding clinicians and professional organizations accountable in support of improved delivery of

preventive sexual health services for young men. New opportunities for reframing sexual health with young men also exist on the policy front in the context of health care reform. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act offers new possibilities for routine, preventive assessments for young people who may otherwise lack health care coverage or regular access to a health care provider.64 By working toward goals of improving access to quality health care for all Americans, strengthening diversity and cultural competency among health care providers, and expanding the health care workforce in underserved communities, the Affordable Care Act will also help reduce health disparities, including racial/ ethnic health disparities and disparities on the basis of sexual orientation and young age.64 Under the new law, young adults will be allowed to stay on their parent’s plan until they turn age 26 years.64 This increased access to health care services for young people will support opportunities to provide routine sexual health prevention and screening services in both clinical and nontraditional settings. As providers increase their engagement in support of young men’s health, health care provider sensitivity would need to be strengthened, especially with young men who may engage in same-sex behaviors. New efforts to train health care providers on culturally competent sexual history approaches and routine HIV and STI screenings and prevention tools are warranted to help ensure that the workforce will be ready for the new way forward under health care reform. Medical, nursing, and allied health professional schools, professional organizations, and AIDS Education Training Centers can help serve these important increased sexual health training needs. Increasing sexual health education and HIV and STI screenings are important action steps that can be implemented in clinical and nonclinical settings and evaluated with performance measures over time. As electronic health records are increasingly utilized and confidential electronic health records procedures help to streamline patient intake processes in clinical settings, brief self-administered sexual histories can be added to intake screens,56 completed by patients in the preclinical area, and reviewed to stimulate HIV and STI awareness


and prevention discussions during the clinical portion of the provider visit. In addition, the first-ever National HIV/ AIDS Strategy (NHAS), with its national goals of reducing HIV incidence, increasing access to care and services for persons living with HIV, and reducing HIV-related heath disparities,65 provides a platform for exploring new approaches and expanding current HIV testing and treatment efforts that address the sexual health needs of underserved populations, such as young Black MSM. Efforts of NHAS include increased opportunities to offer HIV screening, linkage to care, and access to appropriate treatment to more MSM, especially young MSM of color, and this is an opportunity to reduce HIV-related health disparities. Increasing the likelihood of providers offering HIV and STI screening once a young man has accessed services can also be supported by strengthening reimbursement procedures for routine screenings. Aligning evidence-based USPSTF ratings with recommendations for routine HIV testing will help support efforts to ensure insurance reimbursements, which can be a barrier for providers offering preventive care services. Finally, school-based condom education efforts have been linked to decreased HIV and STI diagnoses and increased HIV and STI knowledge among young men in the United States,66 and policy efforts that support school-based sexual education approaches are warranted with all young men, but especially young Black MSM, in support of NHAS efforts. Because young men of color are disproportionately incarcerated in the United States,67 improved sexual health efforts will also require new relationships with prison and jail systems to ensure increased, routine HIV and STI prevention and screening activities, while simultaneously supporting social and structural interventions in support of jobs, housing, improved education, and increased cultural sensitivity for law enforcement to decrease disproportionate incarceration and increase educational and work opportunities for young men of color. Because young men of color have historically been difficult to access through traditional health care venues, exploring existing nontraditional models of success is an important



component of reframing the context of preventive health services and HIV and STI prevention with young Black men. Successful programs can serve as potential models for a broader approach with this at-risk and difficult-to-reach population. One example is The Young Men’s Clinic in New York City, which targets low-income, minority males, and has been shown to effectively operate as an interdisciplinary program combining research with service by integrating public health into clinical care, and including routine reproductive health assessments that actively engage and support the young men for continued care.68 This clinic has been sustained by providing male-friendly, empowering, and healthpromoting environments for young men and collaborations with government, nonprofit, and community-based organizations to leverage resources and provide comprehensive services.68 Nontraditional, community-based approaches with Black men and trusted community opinion leaders also warrant consideration to access young men for reproductive health discussions and services. The Black-owned barber shop has historically been considered a safe and trusted haven for Black men to gather and discuss issues important to them, and many barbers are considered trusted opinion leaders in the communities in which they live and work.69,70 A recent randomized clinical trial of a barber-based intervention showed significant improvement in blood pressure for Black male barber shop patrons with hypertension, which was likely because of the trusted, community barbers engaging with the study participants as health educators and promoters of physician follow-up.70 Other effective community-based, nontraditional efforts describe using a mix of art, hip-hop, and role-playing as avenues to more effectively engage young men as early as middle school and promote prevention of HIV, STIs, and unplanned pregnancy; healthy decision-making; and self-esteem building among young Black men.71,72 For young MSM of color, house and ball community networks often offer trusted support mechanisms that can also facilitate HIV prevention and sexual health efforts.73 Local faith leaders also have a role to play by continuing to become more engaged in community HIV- and STI-prevention efforts with faith

messages that are encouraging, nonstigmatizing, nonhomophobic, and welcoming for church members and their families, regardless of a person’s sexual orientation.74 Mobilization at a community level is also an important component of engaging young Black men in a broader dialogue about preventive health services. Engaging young men through intergenerational dialogue, such as parent--child communication interventions, schoolbased efforts, college fraternities, respected civic organizations, and popular community venues, with consistent preventive healthseeking and sexual health messages will help provide broad support for young men to access trusted, nonjudgmental, and culturally relevant sexual health services. Media radio shows popular in some Black communities have successfully promoted taking a “loved one” to the doctor to encourage preventive health checks,75 and young men of color have been engaged in some of these local efforts. It is also increasingly important to engage social media, Internet, and texting-based communication innovations,76 which have been shown to be a vital means of delivering health-related information and to connect with young Black men, especially MSM, who are increasingly using the Internet for seeking sexual intercourse and often have the additional barriers of homophobia and stigma within their communities and during health-seeking efforts.76 Public---private partnerships can help stimulate innovative strategies, ensure motivation and enthusiasm, increase financial support, decrease homophobia and stigma, and maintain community-level engagement as relevant and culturally tailored activities are developed in support of young men’s health.

CONCLUSIONS

including sexual health discussions and screenings, for young men as an important aspect of HIV and STI prevention and control in the United States. With the introduction of health reform in the United States, there is a new opportunity to set the stage for routine, preventive health checks for young men that should include routine HIV and STI screening and nonjudgmental sexual health discussions that include HIV- and STI-prevention messages that are inclusive of same-sex behaviors. When one also considers that there is a first-ever NHAS that is targeting a reduction in racial/ethnic disparities in HIV disease, the US public health workforce is historically poised to reframe the context of HIV and STI vulnerabilities and shift clinical and public health outcomes by establishing and supporting collaborations at the federal, state, and community level in support of broad sexual health prevention efforts with young men. The large racial/ethnic HIV and STI disparity that disproportionately affects young Black men, especially MSM, requires that we seize this moment and act on these unique opportunities now in an effort to reduce overall sexual health disparities in the United States. j

About the Authors Yzette Lanier and Madeline Y. Sutton are with the Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Correspondence should be sent to Madeline Sutton, CDC, Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Mail Stop E-45, Atlanta, GA 30333 (e-mail: msutton@ cdc.gov). Reprints can be ordered at http://www.ajph.org by clicking the “Reprints” link. This article was accepted May 28, 2012. Note. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Contributors To date, there has been no comprehensive, preventive, public health infrastructure that normalizes the routine reproductive and sexual health education and prevention needs of young men, especially young MSM. The absence of this foundation for young men has contributed to the disproportionate impact of HIV and other STIs, particularly incident HIV infections, in many Black communities, and warrants that we explore new approaches to normalize routine, preventive health visits,


Both authors contributed to the conceptualization, literature review, data analysis, and writing of the article.

Human Participant Protection No protocol approval was needed for this study because no human participants were involved.

References 1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Gynecologic Practice. Primary and preventive care: periodic assessments. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 452. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(6):1444--1451.



2. Boulware LE, Barnes GJ, Wilson RF, et al. Value of the periodic health evaluation. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 136 (prepared by The Johns Hopkins University Evidence-Based Practice Center under contract no. 290-02-0018). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2006. AHRQ publication 06---E011. 3. Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine, Bright Futures Steering Committee, American Academy of Pediatrics. Recommendations for preventive pediatric health care. Pediatrics. 2007;120(6):1376. 4. American Medical Association. Guidelines for Adolescent Preventive Services (GAPS). Available at: http:// www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/39/gapsmono. pdf. Accessed October 15, 2012. 5. Committee on Adolescent Health, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. The initial reproductive health visit. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 335, May 2006. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(5):1215---1219. 6. US Preventive Services Task Force. Recommendations for adults. December 2010. Available at: http:// www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/adultrec.htm. Accessed December 15, 2010. 7. American Academy of Family Physicians. Summary of Recommendations for Clinical Preventive Services. Available at: http://www.aafp.org/online/etc/medialib/ aafp_org/documents/clinical/CPS/rcps08-2005.Par. 0001.File.tmp/June2010.pdf. Accessed October 15, 2012. 8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommended immunization schedules for persons aged 0 through 18 years—United States, 2010. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010;58:51---52. 9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommended adult immunization schedule—United States, 2010. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010;59(1):1---4. 10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV Surveillance Report, 2010. 2012;22. Available at: http:// www.cdc.gov/hiv/surveillance/resources/reports/ 2010report/pdf/2010_HIV_Surveillance_Report_vol_ 22.pdf#Page=1. Accessed May 30, 2012. 11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Disparities in diagnoses of HIV infection between Blacks/ African Americans and other racial/ethnic populations—37 states, 2005---2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60(4):93---98. 12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance Report 2010. Atlanta, GA: Department of Health and Human Services; 2011. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats. Accessed October 15, 2012. 13. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Subpopulation estimates from the HIV incidence surveillance system—United States, June 2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2008;57(36):985---989.

(NC-EST2009---03). Available at: http://www.census. gov/popest/data/historical/2000s/vintage_2009/index. html. Accessed October 15, 2012. 17. Hall HI, An Q, Hutchinson AB, Sansom S. Estimating the lifetime risk of diagnosis of the HIV infection in 33 states, 2004---2005. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2008;49(3):294---297. 18. Marcell AV, Bell DL, Lindberg LD, Takruri A. Prevalence of sexually transmitted infection/human immunodeficiency virus counseling services received by teen males, 1995---2002. J Adolesc Health. 2010;46 (6):553---559. 19. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Male Chlamydia Screening Consultation Meeting Report. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/std/chlamydia/ chlamydiascreening-males.pdf. Accessed April 15, 2012. 20. Su JR, Beltrami JF, Zaidi AA, Weinstock HS. Primary and secondary syphilis among Black and Hispanic men who have sex with men: case report data from 27 states. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(3):145---151. 21. Adimora AA, Schoenbach VJ. Social context, sexual networks, and racial disparities in rates of sexually transmitted infections. J Infect Dis. 2005;191(suppl 1): S115---S122. 22. Fleming DT, Wasserheit JN. From epidemiological synergy to public health policy and practice: the contribution of other sexually transmitted diseases to sexual transmission of HIV infection. Sex Transm Infect. 1999;75(1):3---17. 23. Dorell CG, Sutton MY, Oster AM, et al. Missed opportunities for HIV testing in health care settings among young African American men who have sex with men: implications for the HIV epidemic. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2011;25(11):657---664. 24. Mimiaga MJ, Reisner SL, Bland S, et al. Health system and personal barriers resulting in decreased utilization of HIV and STD testing services among at-risk Black men who have sex with men in Massachusetts. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2009;23(10):825--835.

at: http://www.cmwf.org/usr_doc/sandman_outoftouch_ 374.pdf. Accessed April 24, 2012. 32. Viera AJ, Thorpe JM, Garrett JM. Effects of sex, age, and visits on receipt of preventive healthcare services: a secondary analysis of national data. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6:15. 33. Sonenstein F, ed. Young Men’s Sexual and Reproductive Health. Toward a National Strategy. Framework and Recommendations. Available at: http://www.urban. org/pdfs/young_mens_health.pdf. Accessed May 28, 2012. 34. Kaiser Family Foundation. The health status of African American men in the United States. Race, Ethnicity and Healthcare. April 2007. Available at: http:// www.kff.org/minorityhealth/upload/7630.pdf. Accessed October 15, 2012. 35. Finer LB, Darroch JE, Frost JJ. Services for men at publicly funded family planning agencies, 1998---1999. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2003;35(5):202---207. 36. US Census Bureau, Current Population Survey. Annual Social and Economic Supplement, 2012. Available at: http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/cpstables/ 032012/pov/toc.htm. Accessed October 15, 2012. 37. Fortuna RJ, Robbins BW, Halterman JS. Ambulatory care among young adults in the United States. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(6):379---385. 38. Rich JA. Primary care for young African American men. J Am Coll Health. 2001;49(4):183---186. 39. Wilkerson JM, Smolenski DJ, Horvath KJ, Danilenko GP, Rosser BRS. Online and offline sexual health-seeking patterns of HIV-negative men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2010;14(6):1362---1370. 40. Armstrong BJ, Kalmuss D, Franks M, Hecker G, Bell D. Creating teachable moments: a clinic-based intervention to improve young men’s sexual health. Am J Mens Health. 2010;4(2):135---144. 41. Liddicoat RV, Horton NJ, Urban R, Maier E, Christiansen D, Samet JH. Assessing missed opportunities for HIV testing in medical settings. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19(4):349---356.

25. Ralph LJ, Brindis CD. Access to reproductive healthcare for adolescents: establishing healthy behaviors at a critical juncture in the lifecourse. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;22(5):369---374.

42. Jenness SM, Murrill CS, Liu K, Wendel T, Begier E, Hagan H. Missed opportunities for HIV testing among high-risk heterosexuals. Sex Transm Dis. 2009;36 (11):704---710.

26. Finer LB, Henshaw SK. Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2006;38(2):90---96.

43. Agency for Heathcare Research and Quality. National Healthcare Disparities Report. 2008. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/nhdr08/nhdr08.pdf. Accessed May 15, 2012.

27. Callahan ST, Cooper WO. Uninsurance and health care access among young adults in the United States. Pediatrics. 2005;116(1):88---95. 28. Ventura SJ, Abma JC, Mosher WD, Henshaw SK. Estimated pregnancy rates for the United States, 1990--2005: an update. Nat Vital Stat Rep. 2009;58(4):1---14.

44. Porter LE, Ku L. Use of reproductive health services among young men, 1995. J Adolesc Health. 2000;27 (3):186---194. 45. Alt RL. Where the boys are not: a brief overview of male preventive health. WMJ. 2002;101(4):22---27.

14. Prejean J, Song R, Hernandez A, et al. Estimated HIV incidence in the United States, 2006---2009. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(8):e17502 .

29. Cohen RA, Bloom B. Access to and utilization of medical care for young adults aged 20---29 years: United States, 2008. NCHS data brief, no. 29. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2010.

46. Branson BM, Handsfield HH, Lampe MA, et al. Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents, and pregnant women in health-care settings. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2006;55(RR-14):1---17.

15. Savin-Williams RC, Ream GL. Prevalence and stability of sexual orientation components during adolescence and young adulthood. Arch Sex Behav. 2007;36 (3):385---394.

30. Kaiser Family Foundation. The Uninsured: A Primer. Supplemental Data Tables. December 2010. Available at: http://www.kff.org/uninsured/upload/7451-06_Data_ Tables.pdf. Accessed October 15, 2012.

47. Workowski KA, Berman S; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2010. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010;59(RR-11):1---110.

16. US Census Bureau. Annual estimates of the resident population by sex, race, and Hispanic origin for the United States: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2009

31. Sandman D, Simantov E, An C. Out of Touch: American Men and the Health Care System. Commonwealth Fund Men’s and Women’s Health Survey Findings. Available

48. Qaseem A, Snow V, Shekelle P, Hopkins R Jr, Owens DK. Screening for HIV in health care settings: a guidance statement from the American College of Physicians and




HIV Medicine Association. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150 (2):125---131.

sports examination of high school adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2003;32(5):336---339.

49. Hagan JF, Shaw JS, Duncan P, eds. Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescents. 3rd ed. pocket guide. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2008.

62. Miller KE, Sabo DF, Farrell MP, Barnes GM, Melnick MJ. Athletic participation and sexual behavior in adolescents: the different worlds of boys and girls. J Health Soc Behav. 1998;39(2):108---123.

50. Solberg LI, Nordin JD, Bryant TL, Kristensen AH, Maloney SK. Clinical preventive services for adolescents. Am J Prev Med. 2009;37(5):445---454.

63. CDC Connects. Focus on men’s reproductive health. Available at: http://www.urologycenter.com/pdfs/ Focus-On-Mens-Reproductive-Health-10_22_2010.pdf. Accessed October 15, 2012.

51. Maciosek MV, Coffield AB, Edwards NM, Flottemesch TJ, Goodman MJ, Solberg LI. Priorities among effective clinical preventive services: results of a systematic review and analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2006;31(1):52---61. 52. Chou R, Huffman L. Screening for Human Immunodeficiency Virus: Focused Update of a 2005 Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Prepared for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality by the Oregon Evidence Based Practice Center at the Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, under Contract No. 290-02-0024, Task Order Number 1. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; April 2007. AHRQ publication no. 07-0597-EF-1. 53. Marks G, Crepaz N, Janssen RS. Estimating sexual transmission of HIV from persons aware and unaware that they are infected with the virus in the US. AIDS. 2006;20(10):1447---1450. 54. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Adoption of protective behaviors among persons with recent HIV infection and diagnosis—Alabama, New Jersey, and Tennessee, 1997---1998. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2006;49(23):512---515.

64. US Department of Health and Human Services. Understanding the Affordable Care Act: health disparities and the Affordable Care Act. Available at: http://www. healthcare.gov/law/infocus/disparities/index.html. Accessed October 15, 2012. 65. The White House Office of National AIDS Policy. National HIV/AIDS Strategy for the United States. Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/ uploads/NHAS.pdf. Accessed October 15, 2012. 66. Dodge B, Reece M, Herbenick D. School-based condom education and its relations with diagnoses of and testing for sexually transmitted infections among men in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(12): 2180---2182. 67. Mauer M. Addressing racial disparities in incarceration. Prison J. 2011;91(3 suppl):87S---101S. 68. Armstrong B. The young men’s clinic: addressing men’s reproductive health and responsibilities. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2003;35(5):220---225. 69. Yancy CW. A bald fade and a BP check: comment on “Effectiveness of a barbershop-based intervention for improving hypertension control in Black men.” Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(4):350---352.

55. Fox J, White PJ, Macdonald N, et al. Reductions in HIV transmission risk behaviors following diagnosis of primary HIV infection: a cohort of high-risk men who have sex with men. HIV Med. 2009;10(7):432---438.

70. Victor RG, Ravenell JE, Freeman A, et al. Effectiveness of a barber-based intervention for improving hypertension control in Black men. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(4):342---350.

56. Lanier Y, Castellanos T, Willis L, et al. “Breaking down the barriers”: feedback from National Medical Association physicians about implementing a sexual history tool during routine clinical evaluations with African American male patients. Abstract presented at the 2011 National HIV Prevention Conference; August 15, 2011; Atlanta, GA.

71. Turner-Musa JO, Rhodes WA, Harper PT, Quinton SL. Hip-hop to prevent substance use and HIV among African American youth: a preliminary investigation. J Drug Educ. 2008;38(4):351---365.

57. Pathela P, Hajat A, Schillinger J, Blank S, Sell R, Mostashari F. Discordance between sexual behavior and self-reported sexual identity: a population-based survey of New York City men. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145 (6):416---425. 58. Marcell AV, Wibbelsman C, Seigel WM. Male adolescent sexual and reproductive health care. Pediatrics.2011;128:e1658---e1676. 59. Bernhardt DT, Roberts WO, eds. Preparticipation Sports Evaluations. 4th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Family Physicians, American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Sports Medicine, American Medical Society for Sports Medicine, American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, American Osteopathic Academy of Sports Medicine, and American Academy of Pediatrics Press; 2010:1---160. 60. Goldberg B, Saraniti A, Whitman P, et al. Preparticipation sports assessment: an objective evaluation. Pediatrics. 1980;66(5):736---745.

72. Stephens T, Braithwaite RL, Taylor SE. Model for using hip-hop for small group HIV/AIDS prevention counseling with African American adolescents and young adults. Patient Educ Couns. 1998;35(2):127---137. 73. Phillips G, Peterson J, Binson D, Hidalgo J, Magnus M. House/ball culture and adolescent African-American transgender persons and men who have sex with men: a synthesis of the literature. AIDS Care. 2011;23 (4):515---520. 74. Sutton MY, Parks CP. HIV/AIDS prevention, faith and spirituality among Black/African American and Latino communities in the United States: strengthening scientific faith-based efforts to shift the course of the epidemic and reduce HIV-related health disparities. J Relig Health. 2011;Epub ahead of print. 75. Joyner T. Take a loved one to the doctor day. Available at: http://drday.blackamericaweb.com. Accessed October 15, 2012. 76. Rosser BR, Wilkerson JM, Smolenski DJ, et al. The future of Internet-based HIV prevention: a report on key findings from the men’s INTernet (MINTS-I, II) sex studies. AIDS Behav. 2011;15(suppl 1):S91---S100.

61. Nsuami M, Elie M, Brooks BN, et al. Screening for sexually transmitted diseases during preparticipation



This article has been cited by: 1. Sophia A. Hussen, Karen Andes, Danielle Gilliard, Rana Chakraborty, Carlos del Rio, David J. Malebranche. 2015. Transition to Adulthood and Antiretroviral Adherence Among HIV-Positive Young Black Men Who Have Sex With Men. American Journal of Public Health 105:4, 725-731. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] [PDF Plus] 2. Lisa A. Eaton, Daniel D. Driffin, Christopher Kegler, Harlan Smith, Christopher Conway-Washington, Denise White, Chauncey Cherry. 2015. The Role of Stigma and Medical Mistrust in the Routine Health Care Engagement of Black Men Who Have Sex With Men. American Journal of Public Health 105:2, e75-e82. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] [PDF Plus]