Vol. 8, 1199-1210,
November
Regulation Melanoma
1997
Cell
of Fibroblast Growth Factor 2 Expression Cells by the c-MYB Proto-Oncoprotein’
Mark R. Miglarese,2 Ruth Halaban, and Neil W. Gibson3 Department of Cancer, Immunology and Infectious Deases,
Pfizer Groton, Connecticut 06340 [M. R. M., N. W. G.], and of Dermatology, Yale University School of Medicine, New
Central Research, Department Haven, Connecticut
06520
[B. H.]
Abstract Dysregulated expression of basic fibroblast growth factor [fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF-2)] mediates autocrine growth of melanoma cells. The presence of a consensus Myb binding site in the human FGF-2 promoter prompted us to investigate whether this transcription factor could regulate FGF-2 expression in melanomas. We report that c-MYB mRNA is overexpressed in melanoma cell lines compared to normal melanocytes and that ectopic expression of murine c-Myb in SK-MEL-2 human melanoma cells resufted in increased expression of FGF-2 mRNA and FGF-2 protein. Furthermore, munne c-Myb transactivated a reporter plasmid containing the human FGF-2 promoter region in cotransfected SKMEL-2 human melanoma cells. Although a functional DNA-binding domain was required for transactivation, responsiveness to c-Myb was independent of the putative Myb binding site and mapped to two regions of the FGF-2 promoter that did not bind c-Myb In vltm. We suggest that c-MYB contributes to FGF-2-mediated autocrine growth of melanomas by indirectly regulating the FGF-2 promoter. Introduction FGF-24 is a member of a family of heparin-binding growth factors that play critical roles in development, wound healing, hematopoiesis, and tumorigenesis (1-6). FGFs mediate their
Received 5/5/97; revised 8/25/97; accepted 9/22/97. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to mdi-
cate this fact. in part by USPHS Grant CA44542 from the NIH (to A. H.). M. R. M. was supported as a Pfizer Post-Doctoral Research Scientist 2 To whom requests for repeints should be addressed. Present address: Department of Dermatology, Yale University Medical School, New Haven, CT 06520. Phone: (203) 785-4965; Fax: (203) 785-7234, E-mail:
[email protected]. 3 Present address: Institute of Bone Joint Disorders and Cancer, Bayer Corporation, Pharmaceutical Division, West Haven, CT 06516. 4 The abbreviations used are: FGF. fibroblast growth factor bFGF, basic fibroblast growth factor DNAB, DNA binding; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay; mAb, monoclonal antibody; MBS, Myb binding site; MRE, Myb response element; RT-PCR, reverse transcription-PCR; TBE, I Supported
Tris-borate EDTA, HSF, heat shock factor; dHSE, distal heat shock element; CDK, cyclin-dependent kinase; YRIPA, yellow radioimmunoprecipitation
assay
buffer
MBS mut, mutated
Myb
binding
site.
Growth & Differentiation
in
effects in part by stimulating the catalytic activity of members of the FGF receptor tyrosine kinase family (7, 8). Activation of the FGF receptor stimulates intracellular signaling pathways involved in proliferation, differentiation, and migration (7, 914). FGF-2
is a potent
mitogenic
and
angiogenic
factor
that
is believed to play a role in the growth of several tumors, including melanomas, glioblastomas, hepatomas, leukemias, and cancers of the bladder, prostate, ovary, and breast (15-24). In fact, elevated levels of FGF-2 in the urine or serum of patients with several of these malignancies have been reported to correlate with poor prognosis (1 9, 25, 26). A role for FGF-2 in the growth of normal and transformed melanocytes has been firmly established. Normal melanocytes do not express FGF-2 but require an exogenous supply, most likely produced by basal keratinocytes and dermal fibroblasts (27-29). In contrast, melanoma cells produce FGF-2, which acts as an autocrine growth factor. This conclusion is supported by several lines of evidence: (a) melanoma cell proliferation in vitro is inhibited by internalized anti-FGF-2 antibodies (1 5), by antagonistic FGF-2 peptides spanning the receptor-binding domain (15), or by introduction
of
FGF-2 in murine
antisense
mRNA
oligodeoxynucleotides
(30); and (b) constitutive
melanocytes
results
directed
expression
in FGF-2-independent
against
of FGF-2 growth,
de-differentiation, and morphological transformation in culture (31). Despite the clear role for FGF-2 expression in the proliferation of melanoma cells defined by these observations, the mechanism by which FGF-2 expression is aberrantly activated in these tumors has not been elucidated. Several transcription factors have been reported to regulate FGF-2 promoter activity. In glioblastoma and hepatocellular carcinoma cells, FGF-2 promoter activity is stimulated by mutant p53, suggesting that mutations in the p53 gene may contribute to FGF-2-mediated autocrine growth (32). In addition, the product of the primary response gene, egr-1, has been shown to activate the FGF-2 promoter in human astrocytes, which exhibit FGF-2-mediated autocrine growth (33). Finally, the HOXB7 homeodomain transcription factor was reported to transactivate the FGF-2 promoter in HeLa cells (34). However, the regulation of FGF-2 promoter activity in melanoma cells has not been characterized. The TATA-less human FGF-2 promoter has at least two transcription initiation sites and contains several potential transcription factor binding sites, including a consensus MBS located at position +169 relative to the 5’ transcription initiation site (35, 36). The c-MYB proto-oncogene encodes a 75-kDa transcription factor that is expressed at high levels in immature normal and transformed hematopoietic cells, in which it plays important roles in both proliferation and differentiation (37). Expression of c-MYB mRNA has also been detected in several other normal and transformed cell types, including vascular smooth muscle cells (38), breast carcinomas (39), small cell lung carcinomas (40), colon carcinomas
1189
12
c-Myb
Regulation
of FGF-2
Expression
(41),
neuroblastomas
(42),
and
tion,
rearrangements
near
or
detected
been
that
in several
c-MYB
may
a role
of five
c-MYB
that
melanoma
oligodeoxynucleotides
growth of this
was
tested
of
that
in
growth
in
and in vivo (47). These results, in combination with the presence of a consensus MBS at position + 1 69 in the FGF-2
vitro
led us to speculate
promoter, in regulating
In this human both
FGF-2 report,
expression
we
c-Myb
and
transactivated
in transfected tional
DBD
was
melanoma required
and
elements
ing that c-Myb
the
0.
a func-
for transactivation,
FGF-2
binding to the FGF-2 promoter. plays a role in the FGF-2-mediated anomas
by contributing
c-Myb
without
dysregulated
a)
500
U)
c-MYB of mel-
expression
of
FGF-2.
B
Results Overexpression of FGF-2 Protein and c-MYB mRNA in Melanoma Cells and Transactivation of the FGF-2 Promoter by Munne c-Myb. As a first step toward examining a potential
role for c-MYB
examined expression man
FGF-2 each (Fig.
melanocytes
and
protein
and
melanoma
line
were
through
plasmid luciferase
+ 1 78 of the
stimulated
c-Myb
promoter-reporter cells
human
at position
promoterless
+169
luciferase
plasmid luciferase
increase
sequences
melanoma
including the
In contrast,
plasmid,
for
(see
melc-Myb
using
indicating
required
activity
FGF-2
SK-MEL-2
in experiments
were
in luciferase
then
of a murine
from
manner. reporter
actin
2,4). Fig. 2B shows
activity
activity
was
promoter,
(Fig.
in
amount of the that contains bp
in cotransfected
pGL2.BASIC
promoter
FGF-2
the
the
Fig. 1 . FGF-2 and c-MYB are co-overexpressed in human melanoma cell lines compared to normal melanocytes. A, quantitative ELISA showing several fold differences in the amount of FGF-2 immunoreactive protein in three melanoma cell lines compared to normal melanocytes. Each lysate
was prepared
disrupted
tioned
through
that
pared
luciferase
with FGF-2
the c-Myb promoter
activities
in SK-MEL-2
expression or a mutated
plasmid FGF-2
and
+169,
we com-
cells
cotransfected
either
the wild-type
promoter
cell cultures
and assayed
in
c-Myb-
Fig. 4A).
at position
growing
that
the
MBS
from exponentially
triplicate. The mean values are given, with error bars representing the SE. Inset, the results obtained for normal melanocytes and SK-MEL-2 melanoma cells on a smaller scale to better illustrate the 12-fold difference in the amount of FGF-2 detected in each lysate. B, RT-PCR analysis showing overexpression of c-MYB mRNA in melanoma cell lines compared to normal melanocytes (top panel) using p-actin as a control (bottom panel). Lane 1 , normal melanocytes; Lanes 2-4, melanoma cell lines as indicated; Lane 5, positive control PCR products using 50 amol of specific c-MYB or -actin DNA template.
c-Myb Does Not Function through the Putative MBS in the FGF-2 Promoter. To determine whether c-Myb functhe putative
c-MYB
transactivate
amounts
and a constant reporter plasmid
in a dose-dependent
did not stimulate
assay
human
various
I
!p
Both
melanocytes
could
SK-MEL-2 with
lines.
overexpressed
cotransfection
promoter.
C)
we
mRNA of normal hu-
to normal c-Myb
#{149}44
c-MYB
cell
were
murine
cotransfected
MBS
induced
expression,
melanoma
mRNA
whether
that
FGF-2
FGF-2
compared
1 , A and B). A transient
the putative
anoma
human
c-MYB
cell
c-Myb expression pGL2.bFGFpNB
-290
in regulating
steady-state FGF-2 protein and in exponentially growing cultures
used to determine the human FGF-2 cells
0
0
directly
We suggest that autocrine growth
to the
C .!
U.
Ui
In N.
suggest-
in vitro,
expression
0
1000
z
Ui
0
LL
the con-
U) a)
1500
protein
cells. Although
that did not bind
stimulates
2000
E
murine
FGF-2
-I-
2500
sensus MBS in the FGF-2 promoter did not mediate this response. Instead, responsiveness to c-Myb mapped to two sequence
=
0
overexpress
and stimulated
mRNA
3000
to normal
In addition,
promoter
FGF-2
3500
0.
cells. cells
protein.
a)
be involved
compared
melanoma
the FGF-2
SK-MEL-2
c-Myb
that
FGF-2
of endogenous
might
in melanoma
human
mRNA
expression
c-MYB
demonstrate
melanocytes, c-MYB
that
4000
C
antisense
melanoma
4500
notion,
expressed
and
inhibited
A
have
to speculation
deregulated
mRNA
lines
In addi-
locus
In support
c-MYB
cell
(43).
c-MYB
leading
in the
(44-46).
et a!. reported
Hijiya each
the
melanomas,
play
melanocytes
transformed
glioblastomas within
containing
putative
putative
stimulate
sion
did
at position
increase a
had
luciferase
c-Myb
cated
MBS
MBS
could
activity
Surprisingly,
3A).
on the
function through + 1 69 of the FGF-2 activity an inability
ability
in cotransfected
not
in luciferase reflect
(Fig.
no effect
putative
promoter
of c-Myb
of to
cells,
the
in response
mutation of c-Myb
(Fig.
to c-Myb to interact
indicating MBS
lo-
3B). The expreswith
the
Cell Growth
+55
1201
Activation of the FGF-2 Promoter by c-Myb Is Indirect. Because c-Myb did not seem to function through the putative MBS within the FGF-2 promoter region, we determined
A +1
& Differentiation
+178
which B
elements to c-Myb.
a c-Myb
expression
mids
the
+1
were
and
plas-
promoter.
FGF-2
region
of the FGF-2
transcription
no effect
the with
of reporter
of the
to +12
virtually
mediated
cotransfected
a series
one of the two
had
,
promoter
cells
portions
-290
contains
position
at
V
which
FGF-2
plasmid various
within
moter,
the
SK-MEL-2
containing
Deletions
0
within
response
pro-
start
on luciferase
sites
activity
0
compared ing
to that
that
the
generated
region
from
including
pGL2.bFGFpNB,
bp
+13
indicat-
through
+178
was
sufficient
to maintain maximal luciferase activity in the prosence of ectopic c-Myb (Fig. 4A). Cotransfection of the + 13/ + 1 78 promoter-reporter plasmid with either the c-Myb expression
Mgc.Myb
expression
plasmid
that
per dish
human FGF-2 promoter by c-Myb in SK-MEL-2 melanoma cells. A, schematic representation of the pGL2.bFGFpNB FGF-2 prornoter-luciferase reporter construct. The solid black rectangle marked LUC represents the firefly luciferase reporter gene, the open square represents the putative consensus MBS, and the thin black line represents the promoter elements. Arrows indicate the known transcription start sites, and numbers mark nucleotide position with respect to the most 5’ transcription start site (+1). B, transactivation of the FGF-2 promoter in melanoma cells by c-Myb. SK-MEL-2 melanoma cells were transiently cotransfected with increasing amounts of the pRMb3SV.wt expression plasmid (as indicated) plus 1 g per dish of pGL2.bFGFpNB. Data represent the mean fold activation of three independently transfected dishes over pR3SV empty vector control ± SE. Fig. 2.
Transactivation
of
the
putative MBS. We therefore ated with oligodeoxynucleotide wild-type
or mutated EMSAs
moter.
CMT3COS
a single
containing
that
lysates
MBS murine
bound
copy
whether
probes
putative
showed
cell
tested
c-Myb
containing from
the
c-Myb
of the
MBS
probe from
the
chicken mim-1A promoter (Fig. 3C, Lanes 1, 12, and 14-16). The presence of c-Myb in the major complex containing the mim-1A
probe
was
by a supershift
verified
induced
by a mAb
directed against c-Myb (Fig. 3C, Lane 3). Preincubation with a 100-fold molar excess of unlabeled mim-1A oligodeoxynucleotide ment
but
unlabeled
the
Lanes
13 and
senting
either
inhibited
specificity
of the
wild-type
the
1).
pete
Moreover,
or mutated
MBS
from
from
the
wild-type
or mutated
the
with
the
relative these
luciferase
activity
by c-Myb
putative
was
MBS
in the
FGF-2
promoter
and
indicated
from not
MBS located
that the specific
the FGF-2
mediated
at position
by an interaction
+169.
with
confirmed
highly
responsive
plasmid
resulted
and
+1 12 from
the + 1 3/+ 1 78 promoter-reporter
which
located
+50/+178).
removes
at position
activity
to
a
the
similar
gether,
these
data
through
+49
and
that
+129
that
at least +165)
region
were
required
luciferase
activity
in the
presence
murine
(+112/
for
site
of luciferase from
reporter
through
promoter
through start
generated
control
indicated
+13 plasmid
in a reduction
to
promoterless
re1 78 to
+ 13/+
transcription
+ 55, resulted
level
pGL2.BASIC
remaining
of bp +13/
in substantial
(Fig. 4A, compare Deletion of bp
activity
zX129-165
+ 1 78),
deletion from the
the
plasmid.
two
To-
elements
within
the
(+ 13 FGF-2
maintaining
maximal
of ectopically
expressed
c-Myb.
We next
used
EMSAs
elements
Similar
the results
to
CMT3COS
cell probe,
mim-1A
anti-c-Myb 2, 3, and
from
mouse
probe
FGF-2
(Fig.
4B).
in transfected
IgG (Fig.
control
empty
failed to induce a shift in the mobility (Fig. 4B, Lane 2). In contrast, lysates
fectants
these
c-Myb
with the positive was supershifted
but not with
Lysates
with
in Fig. 3, c-Myb
lysates interacted and the complex 7).
whether
associate
shown
antibody 14-1
to determine
could
control with the 4B, Lanes
vector
trans-
of the mimfrom control
1A
or
c-Myb-expressing CMT3COS cells failed to induce a shift in the mobility of radiolabeled probes corresponding to the + 13 +50,
+ 1 29
FGF-2
to
+ 1 65
and
+ 1 3 to
(Fig. 4B,
promoter
Lanes
Moreover, the interaction between beled mim-1A probe was effectively
+
178 regions
c-Myb and the radiolacompeted by a 100-fold
molar excess of unlabeled mim1A ohigodeoxynucleotide not by unlabeled ohigodeoxynucleotides derived +13 FGF-2
Lanes tion
to
+50,
+129
promoter
used
Together,
18-21). of the
to +165,
+ 1 3/+1
or +13
at the
same
these
78 region
of the
5, 6, 8, 9, 1 1 , and 12).
results
to +178 molar
regions ratios
indicated
of the FGF-2
but
from
the of the
(Fig.
4B,
that activa-
promoter
by c-
the
other
promoters
Thus,
we
stimulation
promoter-reporter
plasmid was
plasmid
of c-Myb for the mim-1A MBS was than that for the putative FGF-2 MBS.
data
control
promoter
Myb does not occur through a direct interaction with c-Myb. A Functional c-Myb DNA Binding Domain Is Required for Activation of the FGF-2 Promoter. The c-Myb DBD has been shown to be required for stimulation of at least two
affinity
greater
Together,
ohigodeoxynucleotides
empty
FGF-2
in luciferase
human
the FGF-2
or the of the
1 78 promoter-reporter
to
repro-
failed to comfor c-Myb binding to the mim-1A MBS probe (Fig. 3C, 15 and 16). These results indicated that c-Myb did not
significantly
tative
oligodeoxynucleotides
derived
MBS
FGF-2
interact
that
formation,
(Fig. 3C, compare
complexes with c-Myb (Fig. 3C, Lanes a 1 00-fold molar excess of unlabeled oh-
godeoxynucleotides
Lanes
ele-
did not form
promoter
putative
response
complex
interaction
In contrast,
14).
AMP
cyclic
oligodeoxynucleotide
confirming
4-1
not
+
ductions
promoter
transfected
control
high-affinity
the
region
to ectopic c-Myb (data not shown). However, +129 through +165 or +13 through +49
pro-
FGF-2
from
to a positive
associeither
plasmid
this
of pu-
compared
in the absence the abilities
of direct DNAB (48, 49). of wild-type c-Myb and a
1202
c-Myb
Regulation
of FGF-2
Expression
DNAB-defective
A +1
-290 MBS wt: F-fl
+55
+178
-_________
i+r
-i_____
stimulate reporter c-Myb
failed
-290
+1
+55
+178
Wi 85G c-Myb
MBS
luciferase
mut
(Fig. 5A), to
from the FGF-2 promoterto wild-type c-Myb, Wi 85G activity
from
both
promoter-reporter
FGF-2
the
plasmids
(Fig. 5B). The requirement for the c-Myb DBD was also demonstrated using a control promoter-reporter plasmid containing five copies of the mim-1A MBS, which specifically
r#{248} r
.
mutant,
to stimulate
and
wild-type
MBS mut:
c-Myb
luciferase activity plasmid. In contrast
B
binds
to c-Myb
with
Lanes
1-3 and
12-16
cell lysates ilar amounts
C 0
in transfected endogenous
the
see also
in lysates
from
blot
was
FGF-2
2 and
1 B showing
expressed
of
that simexpressed
Lanes
c-MYB
Fig. 3C,
analysis
3).
that
in SK-MEL-2 protein
was also
cells transfected with (Fig. 5C, Lane 1). These results mdic-Myb DBD is required for transacti-
vector
of the
5C, in Fig.
of endogenous
that a functional
vation
(Fig.
presented
mRNA
amount
control
cated
5B,
50). Western
cells
data
c-MYB
a small
empty
(Fig.
Ref.
SK-MEL-2 with
detected
affinity
and
with an anti-c-Myb antibody confirmed of wild-type and Wi 85G c-Myb were
Consistent cells,
high
SK-MEL-2
promoter
in
SK-MEL-2
cotransfected
cells.
Regulation of Endogenous FGF-2 Expression by cMyb. To determine whether c-Myb regulated endogenous FGF-2 expression, we transfected SK-MEL-2 cells with plas-
I
2
mids
encoding
Myb
protein
3
plasmid
expression
MBSWt
MBSmut
-
mlm.1A: CRE: MBSwI MBSmuI:
-+
+
--
I
-+
ciated empty
mim-1A
UI
I
anIl.Myb.
I
I
mid
+
FGF-2
expression
--+--
-
-
-
-
-+-
-
--+---+-
-
--+-
-
-
-
+-
-
-
-
-+
mid
or a dominant
interfering
in a 42%
increase
to cells transfected
in cell-asso-
with
a control
(Fig. 6A). In contrast, transfection with a plasMEnT resulted in a 41 % decrease in FGF-2
MEL-2
with
Myb
mRNA
mRNA (which
-:L:=.
)&
3 4
5
of the putative
6
7
MBS
8
91011
in the FGF-2
1213141516
promoter
does
not
transactivation. A, schematic representations (MBS wt) and pGL2.MBS mut (MBS mut) reporter
of the pGL2.bFGFpNB plasmids. Conventions are similar to those described in Fig. 2A. U, putative MBS; U, mutated putative MBS. B, transactivation of the wildtype and mutated FGF-2 promoters by c-Myb. Luciferase activity in 5KMEL-2 cells transiently cotransfected with 8 pg per dish of the pRMb3SV.wt expression plasmid and 1 g per dish of either the pGL2.bFGFpNB (MBS wt)or pGL2.MBSmut(MBS mut) promoter-reporter plasmids. Histograms show the mean fold activation ± SE by c-Myb of wt FGF-2 promoter (E or FGF-2 promoter with mutated MBS () over pR3SV control of three independent experiments, each performed in triplicate. C,
with a control
transcriptional
plasmids
in FGF-2
expression
cells by RT-PCR.
MEnT
engrailed
expression
changes
(Fig. 6B, Lanes encoding
to cells transfected the
plas-
repressor
DBD (Fig. 6A). To determine whether the in FGF-2 expression in response to trans-
a c-Myb expression mRNA expression
iY,
c-Myb-mediated
EnT,
lacking the c-Myb observed changes fection
1 2
compared
encoding
FGF-2
Disruption
resulted
compared
vector encoding
responding
abrogate
c-Myb
+-
C
Fig. 3.
murine
consisting of the murine c-Myb DBD fused to the Drosophila engrailed transcriptional repressor (51). Transient transfection of SK-MEL-2 cells with the c-Myb
Experiment mim-1A
either
(MEnT)
were
mRNA
in transiently
Transfection
plasmid compared
resulted to the
1 and 2), whereas substantially
by cor-
we analyzed
transfected
of SK-MEL-2 in increased empty vector
transfection
reduced
reflected
levels,
with
the amount
5K-
cells with FGF-2 control a plasmid of FGF-2
compared to transfection with the EnT or MEnTAl lacks the entire MEnT coding sequence) control plas-
DNAB analysis of c-Myb with the consensus mim-1A MBS or the putative MBS from the FGF-2 promoter. Lysates from CMT3COS cells transfected with the pRMb3SVori+.wt were incubated with radiolabeled oligodeoxynucleotides and analyzed by EMSA. The c-Myb-DNA complex (solid arrowhead) was supershifted (a) in the presence of an anti-c-Myb antibody (Lane 3). The open arrowhead indicates a specific interaction not supershifted by the anti-c-Myb antibody. The radiolabeled probes indicated at the top were: mim- 1A, positive control probe encoding a consensus MBS from the chicken mim-1 promoter; MBS wt, the wt putative MBS from the FGF-2 promoter, and MBS mut, the mutated MBS from FGF-2 promoter. Additional components of the reaction are listed on the left, and their presence or absence is indicated by + or - , respectively. They include the anti-c-Myb antibody (anti-Myb) or various unlabeled competitor oligodeoxynucleotides (100-fold molar excess). CRE, negative control oligodeoxynucleotide encoding the cAMP response element derived from the mouse c-fos promoter.
Cell Growth
& Differentiation
1203
A Fig. 4. Responsiveness to c-Myb maps to two regions of the FGF-2 promoter that do not directly bind c-Myb. A, relative activities of FGF-2 promoter deletions in the presence ofectopic c-Myb. SK-MEL-2 cells were tran-
siently cotransfected
+1 +55 rr
with 8 g.tg of pcD3.myb
1+
I
plus 1 g of each individual FGF-2 promoter-reporter plasmid per dish. Regions of the FGF-2 promoter in each reporter construct are shown schematically to the left of their corresponding bars. Numbers delineate the nucleotide position numbers for the 5’ and 3’
.267/+178
r$’
.25V+178
I+l$’
I
I
-71/+178
I +13/+178
h--I
I-I
II.,,
#{149}
M29-165
I +50/+178 I-f
boundaries, except for M29-165, which indicates deletion of bp + 1 29 through + 165
+112/+178
4
PGU.BASIC
from the + 13/+1 78 promoter construct. pGL2.BASIC is a prornoterless reporter plasmid. Data are plotted as mean luciferase activity ± SE relative to the pGL2.bFGFpNB promoter-reporter plasmid (-2901+178). Each bar represents 8-25 individually trans-
fected dishes in at least 3 independent
-290/+178
,
I
1+ f$’
II
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
B
ex-
competitor
‘.
mOmlA
Normal
3-5).
diated
in part
4,
i/S..?ii
‘7::
&,
.5
. C
.4
I
.4
FP-
A-L
k
FP-
FP-
w.
melanocytes
2
were
3
4
used
as
for FGF-2
by changes
$
+131+178
je
mRNA expression (Fig. 6B, Lane 6). Thus, the abilities of c-Myb and MEnT to modulate FGF-2 expression in transfected SK-MEL-2 cells seems to be mecontrol
0
1’
1
a negative
+1291+165
‘/d
oligodeoxynucleoti-
(Fig. 6B, Lanes
+131+50
.
des, including AP-2, the consensus binding site for the AP-2 transcription factor, is mdicated above each lane. The c-Myb-DNA complex (solid arrowhead) was supershifted (*) by an anti-c-Myb antibody (Lane 16). The open arrowhead indicates a specific interaction not supershifted by the anti-c-Myb antibody. FP, free probe.
mids
1.6
cells
transfected with either pR3SVori (Vector) or pRMb3SVori+.wt (c-Myb) were incubated with radiolabeled oligodeoxynucleotides and analyzed by EMSA. The radiolabeled probes indicated at the top are: mim-1A, positive control probe; + 13/+50, upstream c-Mybresponsive region; + 1291+ 165, downstream c-Myb-responsive region; and + 13/ +178, minimal FGF-2 promoter region fully responsive to c-Myb. The addition of supershifting antibody(anti-Myb), control antibody (mouse IgG), or 100-fold molar excess of
unlabeled
1.4
actIvIty
mim.1A
periments. B, DNAB analysis of c-Myb and c-Myb-responsive regions of the FGF-2 promoter compared to the mim-1A positive
control probe. Lysates from CMT3COS
1.2
Relative luciforasa
in steady-state
amounts
5
-
6
7
8
.iM
-FP
I 9
10 11 12
Myb
to
13
modulate
FGF-2
1415
1617
protein
18
and
19
23
mRNA
24
expression
in
SK-MEL-2 cells and the ability of endogenous c-Myb ectopic murine c-Myb to regulate FGF-2 promoter-driven luciferase activity in cotransfection assays.
or
of FGF-2
mRNA. To confirm
protein function
that
and mRNA through
the
MEnT-mediated
expression
the FGF-2
decrease
was reflected
promoter
region,
in FGF-2
by an ability SK-MEL-2
to
cells
were cotransfected with the MEnT expression plasmid and FGF-2 promoter-reporter plasmid. Fig. 6C shows that luciferase activity was drastically reduced by cotransfection of the FGF-2 promoter-reporter plasmid with the MEnT ex-
the
pression
plasmid
EnT or MEnThl
compared
control
to cotransfection
plasmids.
with
either
the
Furthermore, cotransfection of SK-MEL-2 cells with the FGF-2 promoter-reporter plasmid and both the c-Myb and MEnT expression plasmids showed that MEnT completely abrogated the increase in luciferase activity mediated by ectopically expressed murine c-Myb (Fig. 6D). Together, these results revealed a positive correlation between the ability of ectopically expressed c-
Discussion We
have
demonstrated
differentially
that
expressed
anoma
lines. Relative cell line examined
FGF-2.
We have
noma
rine fected
suIted and
cell
c-Myb
also
stimulated
c-MYB
in normal
mRNA
and
melanocytes
to normal melanocytes, overexpressed c-MYB
shown
that
luciferase
ectopically activity
FGF-2 and
each melmRNA and
expressed from
are mela-
mu-
a cotrans-
FGF-2 promoter-containing reporter plasmid and rein increased expression of endogenous FGF-2 mRNA protein
in SK-MEL-2
melanoma
cells.
These
results
ar-
gue that c-MYB plays an important role in contributing to the aberrant expression of FGF-2 and the ensuing unchecked proliferation characteristic of melanoma cells. Whereas the importance of dysregulated FGF-2 expression
to melanoma
cell
proliferation
is well
established,
the
1204
c-Myb
Regulation
of FGF-2
Expression
A DNAB
TA
NR
role of c-MYB
in melanomas
ied.
studies
Previous
expressed
I I111
I
I Wild-type
I I1*1
I !+
I
W185G
G
in melanoma
and
mRNA
B
(47). to
which
c-MYB
mRNA
nomas
locus
cells
seems
type
and
to
were
used c-MYB
associated
with
the relative
Regulation
of
target
In contrast, the
FGF-2
C
FGF-2
kQa
83 62 47.5
2
3
mim-1
(55), and bcl-2 hsp
match
flanking
binding (59). its effect by binding
ments
within c-Myb
the FGF-2 and
a profound
because from
that c-Myb DNA ele-
interactions
the FGF-2
in vitro,
that
a functional
c-Myb DBD
did not bind
was
required
to FGF-2
by c-Myb
with
other
transcription
DBD. Indeed, increasing evidence that the Myb DBD domain is important for mediating protein interactions with other transcription factors For
indicates protein(48, 60-
its
example,
transactivation
Kanei-lshii of the
interaction
in
that it functions indirectly of other factors that bind to
or by interacting
promoter via
be-
promoter
by EMSAs.
our observation
the FGF-2
can have
It does not seem to novel non-MBS
derived
in the 5’-(C/
has been reported
it
MBS
promoter,
probes
detected
not
physical
has
70 promoter
the putative MBS to the consensus,
because
on c-Myb
tween
62).
(50),
(56, 57).
by c-Myb
human
(58). However,
factors Fig. 5. Requirement for a functional c-Myb DBD for transactivation of the FGF-2 promoter. A, schematic representations of the wild-type and W185G c-Myb proteins. The three triangles represent the three repeats of the DBD (DNAB). Solid bars represent the transactivation domain, and gray bars represent the negative regulatory (NR) domain. The single amino acid substitution (glycine for tryptophan) in the third repeat ofthe DBD is indicated at the bottom (W-+G). B, transactivation of the FGF-2 promoter by wild-type and W185G c-Myb. Luciferase activity in SK-MEL-2 cells transiently cotransfected with 8 Lg per dish of pRMb3SV.wt (black bars) or pRMb3SV.W185G (gray bats) expression plasmids and 1 g per dish of either the pGL2.bFGFpNB (MBS wt), pGL.2.MBSmut (MBS mut), or the ptk5xMRE.luc (5x mim- 1A) positive control promoter-reporter plasmids (as indicated). The data represent the mean fold activation over pR3SV empty vector of three independently transfected cultures. C, Western analysis of wild-type and mutant Wi 85G c-Myb proteins. SK-MEL-2 cells were transiently transfected with either pR3SV (Vector, Lane 1), pRMb3SV.wt (wt, Lane 2), or pRMb3SV.W1 85G (W185G, Lane 3), and equal amounts of cellular proteins were subjected to Western blotting with anti-c-Myb mAb. The arrowhead indicates Myb proteins. The positions of prestained molecular mass standards are marked on the left in kDa.
both
for the majority
transactivation
cotransfection assays, suggesting either by inducing the expression
I
via
in
MBS-de-
including
the core
promoter -
occur
described
to date,
is a perfect
sequences
Despite
-
additional of FGF-2
can
that
were
that
mechanisms.
T)AAC(GTF)GN(A/CIr)-3’
mediates
I 75
c-Myb
for the
unexpected, promoter
effect
It is
EBV BMRF1 promoter (48, 49). We report that the promoter belongs to this latter group. This result was
somewhat
1
suggesting
(54), CD34
demonstrated
the notion
of endogenous c-MYB cell line did not correlate
has been identified
MBS-independent
clearly
supports
to the expression by
ex-
cell cultures
role in melanomas.
of FGF-2,
(52), Ick (53), CD4
c-myc
pheno-
because
melanoma
-independent
genes
in mela-
in melanoma
transformed
observation
transcription
and
near or within
proliferation, and
contribute cell lines.
transactivation
pendent
of Myb
and
the
by
melanoma
implicated mRNA
an important
amount
factors
MBS-dependent
ileporter
This
play
melanoma
been
with
in
c-MYB
mechanism
in these
been
cellular
growth
cell line exam-
The
that the relative amount detected in each melanoma
different
5xmim-1A
melanoma
was c-MYB
that
rearrangements
melanocyte
in this study.
cell-specific
MBSmut
cell
of c-MYB
be
might
melanoma demonstrated
previously
simply
growing
that
notable mRNA
although
Expression
not
antisense
overexpressed
stud-
mRNA
and that
in each
was
extensively
c-MYB
melanocytes.
have
(44-46).
ponentially
MBSWt
have
normal
is not clear,
c-MYB
with
We
was overexpressed compared
cell lines
that
inhibited
in vivo
med
the
shown
cell lines
oligodeoxynucleotides vitro
has not been
have
et
recently
a!.
hsp
70 promoter
between
the c-Myb
is
showed
that
mediated
and HSF3
by
DBDs
a
and
binding of HSF3-c-Myb-containing complexes to the dHSE within the hsp 70 promoter (60). A similar mechanism may be operating
at the
an association vator.
Interestingly,
FGF-2
promoter,
activity
FGF-2
promoter
between
c-Myb
the which
HSF3
+ 1 3 to was
in cotransfection
to the hsp 70 dHSE coactivate
in which
and +49
required
assays,
the
shows
region for
promoter
of
coactithe
human
maximal
luciferase
sequence
similarity
(Fig. 7A). It is conceivable
the FGF-2
DBD mediates
a transcriptional
through
that c-Myb the
and
+ 1 3/+49
Cell Growth
A
Fig. 6. Endogenous FGF-2 expression in SK-MEL-2 cells is regulated by c-Myb. A, relative amounts of FGF-2 in lysates from SK-MEL-2 cells transiently transfected with pcD3.myb (cMyb) or pSCDMS/MEnT (MEnT) normalized to empty vector controls [pcDNA3.1(+) for pcD3.myb and pSCD/EnT for pSCDMS/MEnT]. B, RT-PCR analysis of FGF-2 (top) and 3-actin (bottom) mRNA expression in SK-MEL-2 cells transfected with pcDNA3.1(+) (Vector, Lane 1), pcD3.myb (c-Myb, Lane 2), pSCDMS/ MEnT (MEnT, Lane 3), pSCD/EnT (EnT, Lane 4) or pSCDMS/MEnTl (MEnThJ, Lane 5), and in normal necnatal human foreskin melanocytes (Melanocytes, Lane 6). C, repression of luciferase activity from the FGF-2
promoter-reporter
by dominant
C 0 U) U)
0.
1205
B 1.6
SK-MEL-2 I
1.4
transfectants I
,
1.2
A,b
w
01 U.
.,
1.0
I
C, U.
0.8
C
I
.
0.6
0.4
123456 c-Myb
MEnT
C
U
S
FGF-2
actin
0
inter-
fering Myb. Luciferase activity in 5KMEL-2 cells transiently cotransfected with pGL2.bFGFpNB (reporter) and either pSCDMS/MEnThl (MEn T+I), pSCD/EnT (En?), or pSCDMS/MEnT (MEnT). Data represent mean counts registered during a 15-s interval minus background ± SE of two independently transfected dishes. 0, inhibition ofectopic c-Myb-mediated stimulated luciferase activity from the FGF-2 promoter-reporter plasmid by dominant interfering Myb. Luciferase activity in SK-MEL-2 cells transiently cotransfected with indicated amounts ofpGL2.bFGFpNB (reporter), pcDNA3.1(+) (vector), pcD3.myb (cMyb), pSCD/EnT (En?), and pSCDMS/ MEnT (MEnT) per dish. Data represent the mean fold activation ± SE of three independently transfected dishes over empty vectors control (first bar on the left).
& Differentiation
D 150
12
125
10
100
8
T
75 .
0
-J
50
4
25
2
0
0
reporter: EnT: MEnTAl:
MEnT:
-
reporter: vector:
10
-
c-Myb:
-
10
10
-
-
l9
1 2 8
EnT: MEnT:
per dish
1 2 8
8
-
-
8
Mg per dish
The
A
+ 1 29/+165
also required FGF-2 HSP
+131+49:
I
70 dHSE:
1111111 III
assays,
I 1111
GTGAATCCCAGAAGACTCTGGAGAGTTC
contains
sponse
FGF-2
the +1 29/+165:
G
with
ICCGCGG
ICCCGGCCCAGI1GCGGACGG’1C
HOXB7 Binding Site
mRNA
FGF-2
may
stimulates
HOXB7.
and
modulated + 1 3/+49
that
FGF-2
by heat region
shock
functions
expression
in melanomas
or stress. at the
level
The
notion
can
that
of transcription
supported by the fact that it lies within the nontranscribed region of the FGF-2 promoter in the highly c-Myb-responsive + 1 3/+
1 78 promoter-reporter
plasmid.
be
the
a novel
is
we cannot
role
expression
interfering
likely
a reflection using
mRNA
this
Myb
study).
of the
Thus, switch
FGF-2
mRNA response
modulated
the
of prothat
or the MEnT
c-Myb
cthat
it
stability
role as a HOXB7 protein
and
to normal
of murine
endogenous FGF-2 protein changes in FGF-2 expression obtained
c-MYB compared
rule out the possibility
in regulating
to its defined
Indeed,
activity in the presence 1 65 region of the FGF-2
the
is transcribed,
nant
promoter + 1 29/+
cooperate
in proliferating
a transformation-associated
FGF-2
plays
Ectopic
34 and
(Ref.
may
activity.
levels
whereas
re-
to specu-
to transactivate
promoter
in melanomas
melanocytes
represent
moter
HOXB7
at similar
was
HOXB7
c-MYB
melanomas,
Because
addition element
with
FGF-2
is expressed and
proliferating
MYB
interact
are overexpressed
which
in cotransfection
characterized
Alternatively,
to stimulate
melanocytes Fig. 7. The +13/+49 and +129/+165 regions ofthe human FGF-2 promoter required by c-Myb contain potential binding sites for other transcription factors. A, alignment of the + 1 31+49 region of the human FGF-2 promoter with the c-Myb-HSF3-responsive dHSE from the human hsp7O promoter. Vertical lines indicate sequence identity. B, location of the HOXB7 binding site and response element within the + 1291+ 1 65 region of the human FGF-2 promoter. Open rectangle, probe used by Care et al. (34) to demonstrate HOXB7 binding activity in nuclear extracts from melanomas cells; shaded box, core HOXB7 binding site.
might
promoter,
activity
Ref. 34). It is interesting
7B;
promoter.
HOXB7
HOXB7
previously
(Fig.
c-MYB
FGF-2
of the FGF-2 luciferase
the
element
late that
B
region
for maximal
in
element.
domi-
expression
of
and mRNA. The moderate in these experiments were
low transfection
the calcium-phosphate
efficiency
routinely
precipitation
method
1
c-Myb
Regulation
of FGF-2 Expression
(63). MEnT also repressed luciferase activity generated from the FGF-2 promoter-reporter plasmid in cotransfected 5KMEL-2 cells in the absence of ectopic c-Myb, indicating that endogenous c-MYB functions through the FGF-2 promoter region. These data, along with our deletion analysis of the FGF-2 promoter, are consistent with c-MYB regulating FGF-2 expression at the level of transcription and clearly support the notion that FGF-2 is a physiologically relevant target for regulation by c-MYB in melanomas. It will be interesting to determine whether c-MYB regulates FGF-2 expression in other cell types, including hematopoietic tumors in which (64,
c-MYB
and
FGF-2
are
known
to be coexpressed
65).
Although the mechanism by which c-MYB mRNA expression is up-regulated in melanoma cell lines is not understood, lesions in the cell cycle regulatory machinery in melanomas might be a contributing factor. A common lesion in familial melanomas is the inactivation of the INK4A/CDKN2 tumor suppressor gene, which encodes the p1 6 cell cycle inhibitor (66, 67). The p16 protein can inhibit CDK4 or CDK6 activity by either disrupting their association with cychin Dl or by forming a ternary p1 6-CDK-cyclin Dl complex (68-72). The inhibition of CDK4 and CDK6 activity leads to the accumulation of the hypophosphorylated form of the retinoblastoma susceptibility gene product (pRB), which in turn associates with transcription factors from the E2F family, leading to the down-regulation of E2F target genes and subsequent cell cycle arrest (73-75). Inactivation of!NK4NCDKN2 is considered to contribute to tumorigenesis by causing the accumulation of hyperphosphorylated pRB and release of active E2Fs that then stimulate the expression of several genes involved in DNA synthesis and cell cycle progression, including c-MYB (76, 77). We thus hypothesize that the absence of functional p1 6 might result in the overexpression of c-MYB, which in turn would activate FGF-2 expression and thereby stimulate the uncontrolled autocrine growth typical of melanomas. Materials
and
Methods
Cell LInes and Culture Conditions. SK-MEL-2 and A-375 (from American CMT3COS African Rekosh (University
cDMEM
[DMEM
The
human
melanoma
cell
lines
Type Culture Collection) and the kidney cell line [a gift from Dr. David
green monkey of Virginia, Charlottesville, supplemented with 1 g/liter
VA)] were maintained in o-glucose and 1 10 mg/liter and 10% fetal bovine serum (Life
sodium pyruvate, 2 mM glutamine, Technologies, Inc.)]. The YUGEN8 human melanoma cell line was isolated from a brain metastasis (78) and maintained in Ham’s F-b medium supplemented with 2 mM glutamine and 10% fetal bovine serum (all from Life Technologies, Inc.). Normal human melanocytes derived from necnatal foreskins were cultured in medium consisting of Ham’s F-i 0 medium supplemented with 2 mM glutammne, 100 units/mI penicillin G (Life Technologies, Inc.), 100 g/ml streptomycin sulfate (Life Technologies, Inc.), 2.5% newborn calf serum, 2% FCS, 2.5% catt serum (all sara from Life Technologies, Inc.), 85 flM 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate, 100 n 3-isobutyl-i-methylxanthine, 10 n choleratoxin, 1 sodium orthovanadate, and 100 nM N6, 2’-O-dibutyryladenosmne 3’,5’-cyclic monophosphate (all from Sigma). Cell cultures were maintained in a humidified incubator at 37#{176}C in 5% CO2. Plasmids. The murine c-Myb expression vectors pRMb3SV.wt and pRMb3SVori+.wt and the empty control vectors pR3SV and pR3SVori that lack c-Myb coding sequences have been described previously (79, 80). The pcD3.myb murine c-Myb expression plasmid was constructed by ligating the 2.3-kb Hindlll-BgIll fragment containing the full-length murine
c-Mj, cDNA from pRMb3SV.wt into pcDNA3.1(+) (Invitrogen). The pRMb3SV.W185G plasmid encodes a full-length murine c-Myb protein
containing a single amino acid substitution at position 185 in the DBD (W to G) that results in defective sequence-specific DNAB activity (80). The pSCDMS/MEnT and pSCD/EnT plasmids [kindly provided by Dr. Kathleen Weston (Institute of Cancer Research, Chester Beatty Laboratories, London, United Kingdom)] encode a dominant interfering Myb fusion protein consisting of a portion of the c-Myb DBD fused amino-terminally to the Drosophila engrailed transcriptional repressor, and the engrailed protein without the c-Myb DBD, respectively (51). The empty control vector, pSCDMS/MEnTM, was generated by digestion of pSCDMS/MEnT with Xbal to release the fusion cDNA insert and religating the vector to itself.
The pGL2.bFGFpNB reporter plasmid contains a portion of the human FGF-2 promoter cloned upstream of the firefly luciferase reporter gene and was generated by ligating a 468-bp Nhel-BamHl fragment (-290 to +178) isolated from pF2.1CAT [a kind gift of Dr. Robert Florkiewicz(Pnzm Pharmaceuticals,
pGL2.MBSmut +171
to +173
La Jolla, CA)] into pGL2.BASIC (Promega). The reporter plasmid contains a 3-bp substitution at positions of the FGF-2 promoter (ACG to TGC) that disrupts the
putative
MBS and creates a unique Sphl site. pGL2.MBSmut
structed
by oligodeoxynucleotide-directed
Sites II kit (Promega).
mutagenesis
Briefly, the 0.5-kb SacI-Hindlll
was con-
using
the Aftered
fragment
containing
the FGF-2 promoter was excised from pGL2.bFGFpNB and ligated into pALTER-i (Promega). Mutations were introduced by following the manufacturer’s instructions (Promega), and the mutated fragment was ligated back into pGL2.BASIC. Mutant plasmids were initially identified by SphI digestion and then confirmed by DNA sequencing on an Applied BioSystems 373 automated sequencer. Nested deletions from the 5’ end of the FGF-2 promoter were generated from pGL2.bFGFpNB using the EraseA-Base system (Promega). Internal deletion ofthe +129 to +165 region of the FGF-2 promoter was performed by digestion with SacIl and religation of the promoter-reporter plasmid containing bp +13 through +178 of the FGF-2 promoter. The ptk5xMRE.Iuc plasmid (81) contains a minimal herpes virus thymidine kinase promoter into which five copies of the highaffinity chicken mim-1A MRE have been inserted. Quantitation of FGF-2. The Quantikine human basic FGF immunoassay (R&D Systems) was used to quantitate FGF-2 in total cell lysates by following the manufacturer’s instructions, with minor modifications. Briefly, total cell lysates were prepared in YRIPA lysis buffer [12 m NaHPO4, 4 mM NaH2PO4, 2 m EDTA, 1 .5 m EGTA, 150 m NaCI, 20 mM NaF, 0.1 % SDS, 1 % sodium deoxycholate, 1 % NP4O, 10 g/ml leupeptin, 10 g/ml pepstatin, 100 g/ml Pefabloc, 1 mg/mI aprotinin, 0.01 unit/mI a2-macroglobulin (Boehringer Mannheim), 1 m phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 1 mi sodium orthovanadate(Sigma)], as described previously (81). Protein content was determined by BCA protein assay (Pierce), and each lysate was diluted in YRIPA to yield 1 mg protein/mI. Some lysates (SK-MEL-2, A-375, and YUGEN8) were further diluted to maintain linearity of the FGF-2 immunoassay (determined to be 5-320 pg of recombinant FGF-2/m. Each lysate was analyzed in triplicate, and the data are reported as either the mean picograms of FGF-2 per milligrams of cellular protein or as the relative amount of FGF-2 detected in lysates from c-Myb or MEnT transfectants normalized to the amount of FGF-2 detected in lysates from corresponding control vector transfectants. Error bars represent SE. RT-PR. Total cellular RNA was prepared from exponentially growing
normal neonatal
human
melanocytes
and human
melanoma
cell lines
using the RNeasy kit with QlAshredders according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen, Inc., Chatsworth, CA). RNA samples were quantitated spectrophotometrically, and their integrity was assessed visually by electrophoresis through a 0.8% denaturing agarose gel (2.2 M formaldehyde) with subsequent ethidium bromide staining. The relative amounts of 3-actin mRNA per microgram of total RNA in each sample were determined to be equivalent by conventional RNA blotting using a (3-actin
cDNA probe. One g of total cellular RNA from each sample was treated with 0.1 unit/ph DNase l(amplification grade; LifeTechnologies, lnc.)for 15 mm at 27#{176}C. DNase I was inactivated by the addition of EDTA to a final concentration of 2.5 mM followed by heating to 65#{176}C for 15 mm. Firststrand cDNA was synthesized using the Advantage RT-for-PCR kit (Clontech). Each reaction contained 5X reaction buffer [1 x buffer
3
mM MgClJ,
random
1 pii ohigo-dT18(for hexamers (for FGF-2
1 g of DNase I-treated total RNA, 5 p1 of = 50 mM Tris-HCI (pH 8.3), 75 m KCI, and c-Myb and (3-actin experiments) and (3-actin experiments), 0.5
or 1 w mu each
Cell Growth
triphosphate, 2 units of recombinant RNase inhibitor, and 200 units of Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase in a final volume of 20 .tl. Samples were incubated for 1 h at 42#{176}C followed by 5 mm at 94#{176}C and diluted to 100 p1 with diethylpyrocarbonate-treated H20. PCR-mediated amplification of c-MYB, FGF-2, and /3-actin cDNAs was carried out using the Advantage KlenTaq Polymerase Mix from Clondeoxynucleotide
tech
according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Reactions were set up in 0.5-mI thin-walled reaction tubes (GeneAmp; Perkin-Elmer Corp.) and contained 10 gd of individual cDNA synthesis reaction; 5 .d of lOx reaction buffer [1 x buffer = 40 mM Tricine-KOH (pH 9.2 at 25#{176}C), 15 m.i potassium acetate, 3.5 mM magnesium acetate, and 75 g/ml BSA]; 0.2 mM each deoxynucleotide triphosphate; 0.4 individual forward and reverse primers for c-MYB (Clontech), FGF-2 (82), or f3-actin (Clontech);
and 1 d ofAdvantage
KlenTaq Polymerase
Mix in a total volume of 50 tl.
The primers used were as follows: human c-MYB forward primer, 5’-AAUAAATACGGTCCCCTG4AGATG-3’; human c-MYB reverse primer, 5’-CAGGTACTGCTACAAGGCTGCAAGG-3’; human FGF-2 forward primer, 5’-GGAGTGTGTGCTAACCG1TACCTGGCTATG-3’; human
FGF-2 reverse primer, 5’-TCAGCTClTAGCAGACAUGGAAGAAAAAG3’; human (3-actin forward primer, 5’-ATCTGGCACCACACCUCTACMTGAGCTGCG-3’; and human (3-actin reverse primer, 5’-CGTCATACTCCTGCTrGCTGATCCACATCTGC-3. Positive control reactions for c-MYB and (3-actin included 50 amol of specific PCR product as a template instead of cDNA(Clontech). Negative control reactions included 10 d of mock cDNA synthesis reactions (no reverse transcriptase) from RNA preparations and yielded no detectable amplification products. The c-MYB primers were designed to amplify a 390-bp fragment of the human c-MYB cDNA (83), whereas the FGF-2 primers amplified a 243-bp fragment of the human FGF-2 cDNA (84). The f3-actin primers were designed to amplify a 838-bp fragment (bp 2941 131) of the human (3-actin cDNA (85). Amplifications were carried out in
a PTC-i00 programmable thermal controller (M. J. Research, Inc.) using the following cycling conditions: 30 cycles of94#{176}C for 1 mm; 62#{176}C for45 s; and 72#{176}C for 45 s followed by 1 cycle of 72#{176}C for 7 mm and incubation at 4#{176}C until sample recovery. Ten pJ from each c-MYB and FGF-2 amphification and 5 d from each (3-actin amplification were fractionated by electrophoresis through a 2% agarose gel (Seakem GTG; FMC Bioproducts) containing 0.2 gImI ethidium bromide in 1 x Tris-acetate EDTA buffer[40 mM Tris-acetate, 10 m EDTA, and 20 m glacial acetic acid (pH 8.4)]. The gel was photographed under UV illumination using Polaroid 55
mega)
were
for empty
vector
the SE EMSAS.
oxynucleotide used
6 x 1O cells/i00-mm
washed once with PBS (137 m NaCI, 2.7 m KCI, 4.3 mp+iNa2HPO4#{149}H20, and 1 .4 mM KH2PO), incubated in growth media for an additional 24 h, and harvested. M cotransfectionsforluciferase assays were performed in duplicate or triplicate and included the indicated amounts of expression and reporter plasmids per dish. Where appropriate, the total amount of
DNA per transfection
was made
equal
by the addition
of pR3SV,
pcDNA3.1(+), pSCDMS/MEnThI, tions for FGF-2 immunoassays 8 pg/dish of either pcDNA3.i(+),
or pSCD/EnT control vectors. Transfecwere performed in duplicate and included pcD3.myb, pSCDMS/MEnT, or pSCD/ EnT. Transfections for anti-c-Myb immunoblots included 25 .&g of mdividual expression plasmid (pR3SV, pRMb3SV.wt, and pRMb3SV.W185G) per dish. Transfections for the preparation of total cellular RNA included 25 g of individual expression plasmid [pcDNA3.1(+), pcD3.myb, pSCDMS/MEnT, pSCDMS/MEnTM, or pSCD/EnT] per dish. Cell lysates were prepared, and luciferase assays were performed using the luciferase assay kit (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, transfected cells were washed once with PBS and incubated in 250 p1 of Cell Culture Lysis Reagent (Promega) for 10 mm at 27#{176}C. Cells were harvested by scraping with a rubber policeman and transferred to microcentrifuge Twenty
AJ
tubes on ice. Lysates were kept on ice of each lysate and 100 .d of luciferase
throughout the assay. Assay
Reagent
(Pro-
(pR3SV
96-well
was measured using In some experiments,
microtiter a DynaTech luciferase
a liquid scintillation counter as described is defined by the mean relative light units
or pcD3.myb)
Total cell lysates
containing
as a positive
from
transfectants.
transfected
Error bars represent
cells express-
CMT3COS
a single
control
MBS
for c-Myb
from binding.
the mim-1A
MRE (79) was
Double-stranded
oligode-
oxynucleotides containing the wild-type (MBS wt) or a mutated (MBS mut) putative MBS from the human FGF-2 promoter spanning positions +162 through +183 were used. In addition, ohigodeoxynucleotide probes ocrresponding to the +13 through +50 and +129 through +165 regions of the human FGF-2 promoter were used. The +13 through +178 fragment of the human FGF-2 promoter was excised from the + 1 3/+ 178 promoterreporter plasmid by digestion with Smal and HindlIl (New England Biolabs), treated with calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase (New England Biolabs), and purified by the phenol-freeze method as described previously (87). Double-stranded ohigodeoxynucleotides contained either blunt ends or 4-bp 5’ overhangs and were radiolabeled to a specific activity of at least 1 .1 x io cpm/ng using T4 polynucleotide kinase (New England Biolabs) with [‘-P]ATP(DuPont New England Nuclear 6000 CVmmoI) or Klenow fragment (New England Biolabs) with [cr-32P]dCTP (DuPont New England Nuclean The sequences 166-bp +13/+178
6000
Ci/mmol),
+50, +165,
respectively.
of the upper strands probe)
cattaTMCGGlTttttcga-3’; ggtcga-3’; MBS mut,
are as follows: MBS
wt,
of the probes mim-1A
MAE,
(except for the 5’-tcgatcgace-
5’-tcgagcggftgCAACGGGAtcccg-
5’-tcgagcggttgCAtgcGGAtcccgggtcga-3’; 5’-gaggccggccccagaaaacccgagcgagtagggggcggc-3’;
and
+
+13/ 129/
5’-gcccggcgggtgccagattagcggacggtgcccgcgg-3’.
Unincorporated nucleotides were removed from the reactions using Quick Spin Sephadex G-25 columns (Boehringer Mannheim) or Probe
Quant G-50
assays and FGF-2 immunoassays)or
on an opaque
ing wild-type murine c-Myb were prepared, and EMSAS were performed as described previously (79). The sequences of the upper strands of the probes (except for the 166-bp +13/+178 probe) are shown below with consensus MBS shown in uppercase. A double-stranded oligode-
turers’
dish (for anti-c-Myb immunoblots and preparation of total cellular RNA) and transfected 16-20 h later. After overnight incubation, the cells were
wells
minus background for pRMb3SV.wt, pRMb3SV.W185G, or pcD3.myb transfectants divided by the mean relative light units minus background
TranslentTransfectlens tions into SK-MEL-2 precipitation method
(forluciferase
to individual
and luciferase activity plate luminometer.
activity was measured using previously (79). Fold activation
film. and Luciferase Assays. Transient transfeccells were performed using the calcium-phosphate (86) as deSCribed previously (81). The SK-MEL-2 human melanoma cell line was chosen for these studies, because it was the most readily transfected using the CaPO4 precipitation method, and because ft expressed the lowest amount of endogenous FGF-2 among the melanoma cellhines tested. Cells were plated at 2 x 1O cells/60-mm dish
added
plate (DynaTech), ML2250 microtiter
& Differentiation
microspin instructions.
columns (Pharmacia) according to the manufacEMSA reactions contained 1 p1 of transfected
cell lysate, 2 pJ of lOx buffer [1 x buffer = 10 m Tris-HCI (pH 7.9), 50 mM NaCI, 1 mM EDTA, 0.05% nonfat dry milk, 5% glycerol, and 0.01 % saturated bromphenol blue], 2 .&l of 100 m DII (Boehringer CMT3COS
Mannheim),
1 sI of 1 mg/mI poly(deoxyinosinic-deoxycytidylic acid) (Sigand 1 d (approximately 0.1 ng or at least 10,000 cpm) of P-labeled probe and were incubated at 27#{176}C for 45 mm. For competition assays, cell extracts were preincubated with unlabeled competitor oligodeoxynucleotide for 30 mm at 27#{176}C, at which time labeled probe was added to the reaction for an additional 15 mm. Double-stranded ohigodeoxynucleotides containing a cyclic AMP response element or a
ma), 13
;.tJ of H20,
consensus AP-2 binding site were used as a nonspecific competitors. For supershifts, cell extract was preincubated with 20 g of anti-c-Myb type I mAb (UBI) for 30 mm at 4#{176}C. Reactions were loaded onto 4 or 6% polyacrylamide gels and run at 100 V in 0.25x TBE buffer at 4#{176}C or 0.5x TBE bufferat 27#{176}C [0.25x ThE = 12.5 mp,i Tris-HCI(pH 8.5), 12.5 m boric acid, and 0.25 mM EDTA]. Gels were dried onto Whatman 3M paper and
film (Kodak) or Reflection film (DuPont New England at -80#{176}C with an intensifying screen for 4-16 h. Immunoblot Detection of c-Myb. Transiently transfected SK-MEL-2 cells were harvested at 48 h posttransfection, lysates were prepared in YRIPA buffer, and protain content was quantitated as described above. exposed Nuclear;
Fifty-six
to XAR-5 NEF-486)
of each lysate were fractionated by 4-20% gradient SDS(BIO-Rad Ready Gels) and electrophoretically transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Schleicher and Schuell) using a semidry transfer cell (Bio-Rad TransBlot SD). Nitrocellulose membranes were blocked in TBS [50 mM Tris-HCI (pH 8) and 150 m.i NaCI] plus 5% nonfat dry milk (Bio-Rad blotting grade blocker) for 1 h at room temperature followed by detection of c-Myb by enhanced chemiluminescence as described previously (79).
PAGE
1207
12
c-MybRegulation
of FGF-2
Expression
Acknowledgments We thank Dr. Timothy P. Bender(University for the murine c-Myb expression plasmids,
ofvirginia,
Charlottesville,
VA) Dr. Kathleen Weston (Institute for Cancer Research, Chester Beatty Laboratories, London, United Kingdom) for the pSCDMS/MEnT and pSCD/EnT plasmids, and Dr. Robert Florkiewicz (Prizm Pharmaceuticals, La Jolla, CA) for the parental
pF2.1CAT
FGF-2 promoter
clone. We thank Dr. Alison Richardson
(Uni-
versity
of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA) for sharing technical expertise for EMSAS and Yevette Clancy (Pfizer Central Research, Groton, CT) for sequencing the FGF-2 promoter clones. We also thank Drs. Jean Beebe and Kevin Coleman (Pfizer Central Research, Groton, CT), Dr. Rick Moran (Medical College of Virginia, Richmond, VA), and Dr. Yoen Smicun (Yale University, New Haven, CT) for helpful discussions.
18. Ogasawara, S., Yano, H., lemura, A., Hisaka, T., and Kojiro, M. Expressions of basic fibroblast growth factor and its receptors and their relationship to proliferation of human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines. Hepatology, 24: 198-205, 1996. 19. Nguyen, M., Watanabe, H., Budson, A. E., Richie, J. P., Hayes, D. F., and Folkman, J. Elevated levels of an angiogenic peptide, basic fibroblast growth factor, in the urine of patients with a wide spectrum of cancers. J. NatI. Cancer Inst., 86: 356-361 , 1994. 20. Menzel, T., Rahman, Z., Calleja, E., White, K., Wilson, E. L, Wieder, R., and Gabrilove, J. Elevated intracellular level of basic fibroblast growth factor correlates with stage of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and is associated with resistance to fludarabine. Blood, 87: 1056-1063, 1996. 21
.
O’Brien,
T., Cranston,
D., Fuggle,
S., Bicknell,
R., and
References
Two mechanisms of basic fibroblast growth factor-induced in bladder cancer. Cancer Res., 57: 136-140, 1997.
1 . Yamaguchi, T. P., and Rossant, J. Fibroblast growth factors in mammalian development. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dcv., 5: 485-491 , 1995.
22. Story, M. T. Regulation of prostate growth by fibroblast tore. World J. Urol., 13: 297-305, 1995.
2. Brew, E. C., Mitchell, M. B., and Harken, A. H. Fibroblast growth factors in operative wound healing. J. Am. CoIl. Surg., 180: 499-504, 1995.
23. Crickard,
3. Allouche, (FGF-2) 4.
M., and Bikfalvi,
in hematopoiesis.
A. The role of fibroblast
Prog.
Growth
Factor
R. E., and Maciag, T. Molecular
Friesel,
fibroblast
growth factor signal transduction.
Res.,
growth
6: 35-48,
factor-2 1995.
K., Gross, J. L, Crickard,
A. L
growth fac-
M., Lele, S., Herblin,
W. F., and Eidsvoog, K. Basic fibroblast growth factor and receptor expression in human ovarian cancer. Gynecol. Oncol., 55: 277-284, 1994. 24. el Yazidi,
mechanisms of angiogenesis: FASEB J., 9: 919-925, 1995.
U., Yoonessi,
Harris,
angiogenesis
fibroblast
I., and
Boilly-Marer,
Y. Production
of acidic
growth factor by the hormone-independent
line MDA-MB-231
.
Anticancer
Res.,
15: 783-790,
and
basic
breast cancer cell 1995.
5. Johnson, D. E., and Williams, L T. Structural and functional diversity in the FGF receptor multigene family. Adv. Cancer Res., 60: 1-41 , 1993.
25. Nguyen, M., Watanabe, H., Budson, A. E., Richie, J. P., and Folkman, J. Elevated levels of the angiogenic peptide basic fibroblast growth factor
6. Basilico,
C., and Moscatelli,
oncogenes.
Adv.
in urine 1993.
Cancer
Res.,
7. Mohammadi,
M., Dikic,
Schlessinger,
J. Identification
fibroblast receptor 1996.
I., Sorokin,
A., Burgess,
factors
W. H., Jaye,
of six novel autophosphorylation
and
cancer
patients.
J. NatI.
activity.
J. Signal transduction
Cell, 61: 203-212,
by receptors
with
M. Broadly expressed to activators of Ras.
1 1 . Wang, J. K., Gao, G., and Goldfarb, M. Fibroblast growth factor receptors have different signaling and mitogenic potentials, Mel. Cell. Biol., 14: 181-188, 1994. 12. Hall, H., Williams, E. J., Moore, S. E., Walsh, F. S., Prochiantz, A., and Doherty, P. Inhibition of Fgf-stimulated phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis, and neurite outgrowth by a cell membrane-permeable phosphopeptide. Curr. Biol., 6: 580-587, 1996. Itoh,
N., Mima, T., and Mikawa, T. Loss of fibroblast growth factor receptors is necessary for terminal differentiation of embryonic limb muscle. Development (Camb.), 122: 291-300, 1996. 14. DeVore, D. L, Horvitz, H. A., and Stem, M. J. An FGF receptor signaling pathway is required for the normal cell migrations of the sex myoblasts in C. elegans hermaphrodites. Cell, 83: 61 1-620, 1995. 15. Halaban, A., Kwon, as an autocrine growth 177-186, 1988.
B. S., Ghosh, S., Delli Bovi, P., and Baird, factor for human melanomas. Oncogene
16. Takahashi, J. A., Fukumoto, M., Igarashi, Hatanaka, M. Correlation of basic fibroblast
levels with the degree of malignancy J. Neurosurg.,
76: 792-798,
A. bFGF Res., 3:
K., Oda, V., Kikuchi, H., and growth factor expression
and vascularity
85: 241-242,
evaluation 2675-2677,
1990.
10. Wang, J. K., Xu, H., Li, H. C., and Goldfarb, SNT-like proteins link FGF receptor stimulation Oncogene, 13: 721-729, 1996.
Inst.,
26. Sliutz, G., Tempfer, C., Obermalr, A., Dadak, C., and Kainz, C. Serum
27.
of basic 1995.
Halaban,
FGF in breast
A., Ghosh,
cancer
S., and
Baird,
growth factor for human melanocytes. kinase
Cancer
M., and
9. Garfinkel, S., Hu, x., Prudovsky, I. A., McMahon, G. A., Kapnik, E. M., McDowell, S. D., and Maciag, T. Fgf-1-dependent proliferative and migratory responses are impaired in senescent human umbilical vein endothehial cells and correlate with the inability to signal tyrosmne phosphorylation of fibroblast growth factor receptor-i substrates. J. Cell Biol., 134: 783-791, 1996.
13.
of bladder
sites on
growth factor receptor 1 and elucidation of their importance in activation and signal transduction. Mol. Cell. Biol., 16: 977-989,
8. Ullrich, A., and Schlessinger, tyrosine
D. The FGF family of growth 59: 1 15-165, 1992.
in human gliomas.
1992.
17. Maret, A., Galy, B., Arnaud, E., Bayard, F., and Prats, H. Inhibition of fibroblast growth factor 2 expression by antusense RNA induced a loss of the transformed phenotype in a human hepatoma cell line. Cancer Res., 55: 5075-5079, 1995.
patients. A. bFGF
Anticancer
Res.,
is the putative
15:
natural
In Vitro Cell. Dev. Bid., 23: 47-52,
1987.
28. Halaban, A., Langdon, R., Birchall, N., Cuono, C., Baird, A., Scott, G., Moellmann, G., and McGuire, J. Basic fibroblast growth factor from human keratinocytes is a natural mitogen for melanocytes. J. Cell Biol., 107: 1611-1619,
1988.
29. Scott, G., Stoler, M., Sarkar, S., and Halaban, A. Localization fibroblast growth ization. J. Invest.
factor mRNA in melanocytic lesions Dermatol., 96: 318-322, 1991.
of basic
by in situ
hybrid-
30. Becker, D., Meier, C. B., and Herlyn, M. Proliferation of human malignant melanomas is inhibited by antisense oligodeoxynucleotides targeted against basic fibroblast growth factor. EMBO J., 8: 368-3691, 1989. 31 . Dotto, G. P., Moellmann, G., Ghosh, S., Edwards, M., and Halaban, R. Transformation of murine melanocytes by basic fibroblast growth factor
cDNA and oncogenes and selective suppression notype in a reconstituted cutaneous environment. 3128, 1989. 32.
Ueba,
T., Nosaka,
Vogelstein, regulation
blastoma
of basic
fibroblast
and hepatocellular
91: 9009-9013, 33.
T., Takahashi,
B., Oda, Y., Kikuchi,
of the transformed J. Cell Bid.,
J. A., Shibata,
F., Florkiewicz,
H., and Hatanaka,
growth
factor
carcinoma
gene
phe-
109:3115R. 1,
M. Transcriptional
by p53 in human
glio-
cells. Proc. NatI. Acad. Sci. USA,
1994.
Biesiada,
E., Razandi, M., and Levin, E. A. Egr-1 activates basic fibroblast growth factor transcription. Mechanistic implications for astrocyte proliferation. J. Biol. Chem., 271: 18576-18581 , 1996. 34. Care, Parmiani,
A., Silvani, G., Peschle,
A., Meccia, E., Matha, G., Stoppacciaro, A., C., and Colombo, M. P. HOXB7 constitutively activates basic fibroblast growth factor in melanomas. Mol. Cell. Bid., 16: 4842-4851, 1996. 35. Bost, production
L M., and Hjelmeland, of bFGF transcripts.
L M. Cell density regulates Growth Factors, 9: 195-203,
36. Shibata, F., Baird, A., and Florkiewicz, tion of the human basic fibroblast growth Factors, 4: 277-287, 1991.
differential 1993.
A. Z. Functional characterizafactor gene promoter. Growth
Cell Growth
37.
Graf,
T. Myb:
ferentiation
a transcriptional
in hematopoietic
activator
linking
proliferation
and dif-
cells. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 2: 249-55,
1992.
267: 4625-4630,
D., Badiani,
mutant causes apeptosis
38. Brown, K. E., Kindy, M. S., and Sonenshein, G. E. Expression of the c-Myb proto-oncogene in bovine vascular smooth muscle cells. J. Biol. Chem.,
57. Taylor,
1992.
& Differentiation
P., and Weston, K. A dominant interfering Myb in T cells. Genes Dcv., 10: 2732-2744, 1996.
58. Deng, 0. L, lshii, S., and Sarai, A. Binding site analysis of c-Myb: screening of potential binding sites by using the mutation matrix derived from systematic binding affinity measurements. Nucleic Acids Res., 24: 766-774, 1996.
39. Guenn, M., Sheng, Z. M., Andrieu, N., and Riou, G. Strong association between c-Myb and oestrogen-receptor expression in human breast cancer. Oncogene, 5: 131-135, 1990.
59.
40. Griffin, C. A., and Baylin, S. B. Expression of the c-Myb human small cell lung carcinoma. Cancer Res., 45: 272-275,
60. Kanei-lshii, C., Tanikawa, J., Nakai, A., Morimoto, A. I., and lshii, Activation of heat shock transcription factor 3 by c-myb in the absence cellular stress. Science (Washington DC), 277: 246-248, 1997.
oncogene 1985.
in
41 . Alitalo, K., Wmnqvist, A., Un, C. C., dela Chapelle, A., Schwab, M., and Bishop, J. M. Aberrant expression of an amplified c-Myb oncogene in two cell lines from a colon carcinoma. Proc. NatI. Aced. Sci. USA, 81: 45344538, 1984. 42. Thiele,
C. J., Cohen,
P. S., and
Israel,
M. A. Regulation
expression in human neuroblastoma cells during retinoic differentiation. Mol. Cell. Biol., 8: 1677-1683, 1988. 43. Wefter,
C., Henn,
W., Theisinger,
B., Fischer,
H., Zang,
N. The cellular myb oncogene
is amplified,
rearranged
human
Cancer
52: 57-62,
glioblastoma
cell lines.
Left.,
of c-myb acid-induced
K. D., and Blin, and activated in 1990.
44. Trent, J. M., Thompson, F. H., and Meyskens, F. L, Jr. Identification of a recurring translocation site involving chromosome 6 in human malignant melanoma. Cancer Res., 49: 420-423, 1989. 45. Dasgupta, P., Linnenbach, A. J., Reddy, E. P. Molecular cloning of the 6 in cutaneous malignant melanoma: locus and translocation of a segment 1201-1205, 1989. 46.
Linnenbach,
A. J., Huebner,
K., Reddy,
A. H., Nowell, P. C., and Koprowski, protooncogene and deletion kinase C in human melanoma 74-78, 1988.
Giaccia, A. J., Stamato, T. D., and breakpoint region on chromosome evidence for deletion in the c-myb of chromosome 12. Oncogene, 4: E. P., Herlyn,
H. Structural
within the gene cell lines. Proc.
alteration
M., Parmiter,
in the MYB
encoding a-type protein NatI. Aced. Sci. USA, 85:
47. Hijiya, N., Zhang, J., Ratajczak, M. Z., Kant, J. A., DeRiel, K., Herlyn, M., Zon, G., and Gewirtz, A. M. Biologic and therapeutic significance of
MYB expression in human melanoma. 4499-4503, 1994.
Proc. NatI. Aced. Sci. USA, 91:
48. Kanei-lshii, C., Yasukawa, T., Morimoto, A. I., and lshii, S. c-Mybinduced trans-activation mediated by heat shock elements without soquence-specific DNA binding of c-Myb. J. Biol. Chem., 269: 1576815775, 1994. 49.
Kenney,
S. C., Holley-Guthrie, E., Quinlivan, E. B., Gutsch, D., Zhang, T., Giot, J. F., and Sergeant, A. The cellular oncogene c-myb can interact synergistically with the Epstein-Barr virus BZLFI transactivator in lymphoid cells. Mol. Cell. Biol., 12: 136-146, 1992.
Q., Bender,
50. Ness, S. A., Marknell, A., and Graf, T. The v-myb oncogene product binds to and activates the promyelocyte-specific mim-i gene. Cell, 59: 1115-1125,
1989.
51 . Badiani, P., Corbella, P., Kioussis, D., Marvel, J., and Weston, K. Dominant interfering alleles define a role for c-Myb in T-cell development. Genes Dcv., 8: 770-782, 1994.
52. Evans, J. L, Moore, T. L, Kuehl, W. M., Bender, T., and Ting, J. P. Functionalanalysis ofc-Myb protein in T-lymphocytic celllines shows that it trans-activates the c-myc promoter. Mel. Cell. Biol., 10: 5747-5752, 1990. 53. McCracken, S., Leung, S., Bosselut, R., Ghysdael, J., and Miyamoto, N. G. Myb and Ets related transcription factors are required for activity of the human Ick type I promoter. Oncogene, 9: 3609-3615, 1994. 54. Siu, G., Wurster, A. L, Upsick, J. S., and Hedrick, S. M. Expression of the CD4 gene requires a Myb transcription factor. Mel. Cell. Biol., 12: 1592-1604, 1992. 55. Melotti, P., Ku, D. H., and Calabretta, B. Regulation of the expression of the hematopoietic stem cell antigen CD34: role of c-myb. J. Exp. Med., 179: 1023-1028, 1994. 56.
Frampton,
up-regulates Dev.,
J., Ramqvist,
T., and Graf, T. v-Myb
bcl-2 and suppresses
10: 2720-2731,
1996.
apoptosis
of E26 leukemia
in myeloid
virus
cells. Genes
12
Howe,
specific
K. M., and Watson,
recognition
3913-3919,
A. J. Nucleotide
of DNA by c-myb
preferences
protein.
in sequence-
Nucleic Acids Res., 19:
1991. S. of
61 . Dash, A. B., Omco, F. C., and Ness, S. A. The EVES motif mediates both intermolecular and intramolecular regulation of c-Myb. Genes Dcv., 10: 1858-1869, 1996. 62.
Mink,
S., Kerber,
U., and
Klempnauer,
and v-Myb is required for synergistic Cell.
Biol.,
63.
FeIgner,
16: 1316-1325,
K. H. Interaction
activation
of C/EBPf3
of the mim-1 gene. Mol.
1996.
P. L, Gadek,
T. A., Holm,
M., Roman,
A., Chan,
H. W., Wenz,
M., Northrop, J. P., Ringold, G. M., and Danielson, M. Upofection: a highly efficient, lipid-mediated DNA-transfection procedure. Proc. NatI. Acad. Sci. USA, 64. Gu,
84: 7413-7417,
Constitutive human
1987.
X. F., Bikfalvi,
A., Chen,
V. Z., Caen,
and selective expression
leukaemia
cell lines.
Han, 1 C. growth factor in
J. P., and
of basic fibroblast
Eur. J. Haematol.,
55: 189-194,
1995.
65. Allouche, M., Bayard, F., Clamens, S., Fillola, G., Sic, P., and Amalric, F. Expression of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFG9 and FGF-receptors in human leukemic cells. Leukemia (Baltimore), 9: 77-86, 1995. 66. W.,
Kamb, A., Shattuck-Eidens, Hussey, C., Tran, T., Miki,
D., Eeles, R., Uu, Q., Gruis, N. A., Ding, Y., Weaver-Feidhaus, J., McClure, M.,
Aitken, J. F., Anderson, D. E., Bergman, W., Frants, A., Goldgar, D. E., Green, A., MacLennan, R., Martin, N. G., Meyer, L J., Youl, P., Zone, J. J., Skolnick,
M. H., and
Connon-Albright,
L A. Analysis
(CDKN2) as a candidate for the chromosome locus. Nat. Genet., 8: 23-26, 1994. 67.
FitzGerald,
M. G., Harkin,
D. P., Silva-Arrieta,
Lucchina, L C., Unsal, H., O’Neill,
of the
9p melanoma
p16
gene
susceptibility
S., MacDonald,
D. J.,
E., Koh, J., Finkelstein,
D. M.,
Isselbacher, K. J., Sober, A. J., and Haber, D. A. Prevalence of germ-line mutations in p16, p19ARF, and CDK4 in familial melanoma: analysis of a clinic-based population. Proc. NatI. Aced. Sci. USA, 93: 8541-8545, 1996. 68.
Aprelikova,
0., Xiong,
V., and Liu, E. T. Beth
cyclin-dependent
kinase (CDK) inhibitors
cyclin-dependent 270: 18195-18197,
kinases 1995.
69.
Parry,
D., Bates,
by the CDK-activating
S., Mann,
p16 and p21 families
D. J., and
kinase. Peters,
D-Cdk complexes in Rb-negative cells correlates p16INK4/MTS1 tumour suppressor gene product. 511,
of
block the phosphorylation J. Biol.
of
Chem.,
G. Lack with high
EMBO
of cyclin levels of J., 14: 503-
1995.
70. Guan, K. L, Jenkins, C. W., Li, Y., Nichols, M. A., Wu, X., O’Keefe, C. L, Matera, A. G., and Xiong, Y. Growth suppression by p18, a pl6lNK4/ MTS1 - and p14INK4B/MTS2-related CDK6 inhibitor, correlates with wildtype pRb function, Genes Dcv., 8: 2939-2952, 1994. 71 . Serrano, M., Hannon, G. J., and Beach, D. A new regulatory cell-cycle control causing specific inhibition of cyclin D/CDK4. (Lond.), 366: 704-707, 1993.
motif in Nature
72. Hirai, H., Reussel, M. F., Kate, J. Y., Ashmun, R. A, and Sherr, C. J. Novel INK4 proteins, p19 and p18, are specific inhibitors of the cyclin D-dependent kinases CDK4 and CDK6. Mel. Cell. Biol., 15: 2672-2681, 1995.
73. Weintraub,
S. J., Chow, K. N., Lue, A. X., Zhang, S. H., He, S., and
Dean, D. C. Mechanism of active blastoma protein. Nature (Lond.), 74. Sherr, dependent
transcriptional 375: 812-815,
repression 1995.
C. J., and Roberts, J. M. Inhibitors of mammalian kinases. Genes Dcv., 9: 1 149-1 163, 1995.
75. Nevins, J. A. E2F: alink viral oncoproteins. Science
between the Rb tumorsuppresser (Washington DC), 258: 424-429,
by the retinoG1 cyclinprotein 1992.
and
1210
c-Myb
76.
Regulation
DeGregeri,
J.,
of FGF-2
Expression
Kowalik,
T., and
targets
for
by the E2F1 transcription factor include DNA synthesisG1-S-regulatory genes. Mel. Cell. Biol., 15: 4215-4224, 1995.
Nevins,
J. A. Cellular
and
activation
77. Sala, A., Nicolaides, N. C., Engelhard, A., Bellon, T., Lawe, D. C., Arnold, A., Grana, X., Giordano, A., and Calabretta, B. Correlation between E2F-1 requirement in the S phase and E2F-1 transactivatien of cell cycle-related genes in human cells. Cancer Roe., 54: 1402-1406, 1994. 78. Halaban, A., Ghosh, S., Duray, P., Kirkweed, J. M., and Lamer, A. B. Human melanocytes cultured from nevi and melanemas. J. Invest. Dermatol., 87: 95-101 , 1986. 79. Miglarese, M. R., Richardson, A. F., Aziz, N., and Bender, T. P. Differential regulation of c-Myb-induced transcription activation by a phesphorylation site in the negative regulatory domain. J. Biol. Chem., 271: 22697-22705, 1996. 80. Cuddihy, A. E., Brents, L A., Aziz, N., Bender, T. P., and Kuehl, W. M. Only the DNA binding and transactivation domains of c-Myb are required to block terminal differentiation of murine erythroleukemia cells. Mel. Cell. Biol., 13: 3505-3513, 1993. 81
.
Aziz,
N.,
Miglarese,
M.
R., Hendrickson,
A. C.,
Sturgill, T. W., Hunt, D. F., and Bender, T. P. Modulation transcription activation ulatory domain. Proc.
Shabanowitz,
Brogi,
E., Winkles,
J. A., Underwood,
A., Clinton,
S. K., Alberts,
Libby, P. Distinct pattems their receptors in human
of expression of fibroblast growth atheroma and nonatherosclerotic
sociation
with
plaque
J. Clin. Invest., 92: 2408-2418,
i993.
83.
of acidic
Majello,
microvessels
B., Kenyon,
L C., and
Dalla-Favera,
nucleotide
sequence
of
tooncogene: genomic
FGF
locus.
Proc.
cDNA
NatI. Acad. Sci. USA, 83:
and
and As-
macrophages.
R. Human and
G. F.,
factors arteries.
c-myb
organization
9636-9640,
proof the
1986.
A., Mergia, A., Friedman, J., Gespodarowicz, D., and Fiddes, J. C. Human basic fibroblast growth factor: nucleetide sequence and genomic organization. EMBO J., 5: 2523-2528, 1986. 84. Abraham,
J. A., Whang, J. L, Tumole,
85. Ponte, P., Ng, S. Y., Engel, J., Gunning, P., and Kedes, L Evolutionary conservation in the untranslated regions of actin mRNAs: DNA sequence of a human
(3-actin
cDNA.
Nucleic
Acids
Res.,
12: 1687-1696,
1984.
86. Graham, F. L and Van der Eb, A. J. A new technique for the assay infectivity of human adenovirus 5 DNA. Virology, 52: 456-467, 1973.
of
J.,
of c-Myb-induced
by a phesphorylation site near the negative NatI. Aced. Sci. USA, 92: 6429-6433, 1995.
82.
reg-
87. Bewsey, K. E., Johnson, M. E., Huff, J. P. Rapid isolation cation of DNA from agarose gels: the phenol-freeze-fracture Biotechniques,
10: 724-725,
1991.
and purifimethod.