Relapse of autoimmune diseases after autologous T ... - Europe PMC

4 downloads 0 Views 116KB Size Report
except in the patient with WG, who still received ciclosporin. A for her kidney transplant. Two patients relapsed after 7, and 19 months, respectively (one SSc, one ...
Letters

1787

5 Hawton K, Rodham K, Evans E, Weatherall R. Deliberate self-harm in adolescents: self report survey in schools in England. BMJ 2002;325:1207–11. 6 Suris JC, Michaud PA, Viner R. The adolescent with a chronic condition. Part I: Developmental isssues. Arch Dis Child 2004;8:938–42.

3 Cassidy JT, Petty RE. Textbook of pediatric rheumatology, 4th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2001. 4 Farrington ML, Haas JE, Nazar-Stewart V, Mellins E. Eosinophilic fasciitis in children frequently progresses to scleroderma-like cutaneous fibrosis. J Rheumatol 1993;20:128–32.

Relapse of autoimmune diseases after autologous T cell depleted stem cell transplantation may be triggered by T cells recently emigrated from the thymus I Ko¨tter*, T Daikeler*, H Einsele, S Koch, L Lochmann, L Kanz, J Lo¨ffler ............................................................................................................................... Ann Rheum Dis 2005;64:1787–1789. doi: 10.1136/ard.2004.032870

H

igh dose immunosuppressive therapy with subsequent autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has proved effective for treatment resistant autoimmune diseases.1 However, in a number of patients, relapses of autoimmune disease after initial improvement or even remission occur. Until recently, it was impossible to differentiate recent thymic emigrants from residual or peripherally expanded T cells. Douek and coworkers2 and later our group3 described a method for detection of T cell receptor excision circles, stable DNA episomes which are formed during T cell receptor rearrangement in the thymus which are not replicated during mitosis, but are diluted during cell divisions.4 This study aimed at investigating whether these flares are associated with de novo T cell development. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were collected from six patients, mean age 32.5 years, range 24–42 (four with systemic sclerosis (SSc), one with Wegener’s granulomatosis (WG), one with mutilating psoriatic arthritis (PsA)), after high dose immunosuppression with cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg body weight plus anti-thymocyte globulin 20 mg/ kg on days 1–4, with subsequent retransfusion of 4.26106 (median) CD34+ selected (by CliniMacs device) cells/kg body weight. Blood collection was performed at week 2 and then, at bimonthly intervals, genomic DNA was extracted using the QIAmp DNA Blood Mini Kit. DNA was stored at 280˚C until analysis. T cell receptor rearrangement excision circles

(TRECs) were measured by real time polymerase chain reaction using the light cycler (Roche Diagnostics Corporation, Idaho, USA). The study was approved by the local ethics committee and patients’ informed consent obtained. All patients improved considerably (all patients with SSc) or went into remission (PsA, WG) after ASCT. In all patients, previous immunosuppressive therapy was discontinued, except in the patient with WG, who still received ciclosporin A for her kidney transplant. Two patients relapsed after 7, and 19 months, respectively (one SSc, one PsA). CD3+/CD4+ T cells were recovered after 6–14 months (median 12), and CD3+/CD8+ T cells a maximum of 3 months after ASCT in all patients. Autoantibodies disappeared in four of five patients after a median of 6 months and their recurrence or disappearance later did not correlate with relapse or remission. TRECs could not be detected in the patients shortly after ASCT (week 2), but recurred 9–26 months (median 16 months) after ASCT. In the two patients who experienced relapses, TRECs became detectable at the time when the first symptoms of relapse were noticed (SSc, patient No 3: relapse after 7 months, TRECs after 9 months; PsA, patient no 4: relapse after 19, TRECs after 21 months— the blood collection did not always coincide exactly with the diagnosis of relapse, which explains the 2 months’ difference between diagnosis and first detection of TRECs) (fig 1, table 1). Figure 1 First detection of TRECs and relation to diagnosis of relapse.

TREC detection Patient 1, WG Patient 2, SSc Relapse

Patient 3, SSc

Relapse

Patient 4, PsA Patient 5, SSc Patient 6, SSc 0

3

6

9

12

15

18

21

24

27

30

33

36

39

Time (months)

www.annrheumdis.com

Letters 1788

cificepsnU

DN

geN

06/1

0215/1 iloelcuN

iloelcuN

0215/1

DN

iloelcuN

0215/1

DN

iloelcuN

0215/1

DN

DN

iloelcuN

ANA

0001/1

geN

DN

cificepsnU 0215/1 iloelcuN

geN

DN

+ 07-lCS

cificepsnU 0215/1 iloelcuN

06/1 iloelcuN

iloelcuN

081/1

cificepsnU

ANA

061/1

iloelcuN

0215/1

DN

005/1

ANA

0001 /1

iloelcuN

0251/1

DN

ACNAc

215/1

07-lCS

055/1

iloelcuN

0215/1

enoN

DN

,055/1

ACNAc

4

3

2

5

+ 07-lCS

1

3

4

+ 07-lCS iloelcuN

ACNAc

0001/1

DN

,ANA

005/1

16

6

3

DN

ACNAc

6

36

7

2

DN

005/1

7

81

06

8

1

geN

ANA

061/1

ACNAc

7

11

5

29

6

6

DN

DN

2.6

6

01

12

08

DN

7

DN

DN

8

4

DN

08/1

5

DN

4

4

14

ACNAc

7

7

3

5

14

08/1

6 5

2

3

53

ACNAc

DN 51

33

geN

6

01 5.2

DN

DN

8 6

2

4

03

005/1

5 DN 21

32

ACNAc

DN DN DN 7.2

DN

031/1

AN DN 41 3.2

4

92

ACNAc

AN DN 3

3

7.52

082/1

8 3

5

DN

ACNAc

6

4

12

6

03

bA-otuA

DN

61

42

12

71

61

61

DN

61

71

11

53

41

1

1

0

02

7

41

4

5

6

DN

32

)%( 65DC AN

41

2

3

DN

9

5.02

5

DN

44.0

3.0

DN

4

1

0

71

5

5

DN

61

4

3

22

71

4

9

22

02

5

6

91

02

71

DN

5.4

DN

81

02

91 7

01

DN

51

DN 7

DN

71 6.7

8

02

DN

9

21

8.91

DN

11

31

DN

DN

71

12 4

51

AN

21

1

DN

36

33

AN

AN

33

31

95

DN

DN

DN

03

DN

66

53

DN

63

13

6.61

47

DN

DN

13

03

71

77

04

14

33

DN

32

97

34

DN

23

43

22

28

44

84

24

DN

12

08

25

84

24

32

32

38

DN

DN

DN

24

31

38

DN

6.84

44

54

51

97

66

54

35

44

DN

87

77

03

26

0

0

0

0

72

71

83

04

02

9

63

81

1

2

3

4

5

6

03

)%( 02DC

DN

91

13

AN

AN

82

72

02

DN

DN

DN

52

DN

91

92

DN

63

82

22

41

DN

DN

43

42

22

21

32

92

53

DN

52

01

32

DN

73

81

81

8

91

22

92

DN

71

9

71

22

92

71

51

7

DN

DN

DN

61

31

7

DN

91

22

81

01

7

8

51

81

9

DN

5

5

11

81

3

0

0

1

5.4

6

72

23

15

94

63

36

1

2

3

4

5

6

54

)%( 8DC

DN

2.43

AN

AN

3.04

7.31

3.82

4.22

7.91

7.01

7.74

81

9.72

1.03

1.42

9.51

7.25

1.32

DN

2.82

4.61

6.8

4.35

8.22

1.32

7.52

5.41

4.31

6.75

4.91

DN

9.52

9.9

8.11

2.25

9.91

0.52

1.92

DN

71

9

71

22

4.52

71

51

7

DN

DN

DN

8.02

21

3.74

03

7.32

6.03

8.81

21

8.52

4.92

7.51

02

6.92

4.4

7.44

8.13

51

4.42

3

6.1

4.42

9.54

5.71

6.7

11

02

92

52

61

12

1

2

3

4

5

6

2.52

5 .3 1

1.41

)%( 4DC

6.41

5.51

0604

0093

0374

0454

0774

0194

DN

0943

0594

0416

0963

0065

0816

0763

0507

0844

0122

0193

0425

0924

0048

0105

0326

)AsP( 4

)cSS( 5

)cSS( 6

0924

0235

)%( setycohpmyL AN

0294

0177

)cSS( 2

)cSS( 3

0987

0777

0177

0107

DN

0749

0516

0849

0017

0019

0987

DN

DN

0765

03211

01501

0567

0059

0587

01301

0568

0277

0476

0317

0536

0027

0888

0096

0598

0267

0886

0896

0837

0185

0986

AN

0875

04511

0826 03 6 4

DN

0317

1 elbaT

oN tneitaP

l m /setycokueL

)GW( 1

0688

0 keeW

0546

2 keeW

0785

61 keeW

07411

42 keeW

0307

63 keeW

0499

84 keeW

0345

06 keeW

0175

27 keeW

0927

09 keeW

0848

601 keeW

0827

221 keeW

01201

831 keeW

0326

271 keeW

04401

402 keeW

noitatnalpsnart llec mets retfa slavretni raluger ta dna erofeb stneitap eht fo sCERT dna ,sertit ydobitnaotua ,noitutitsnocer enummI

www.annrheumdis.com

ND, not done; NA, not available, neg: negative. Week 0, week before conditioning; week 2, 2 weeks after peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (retransfusion of autologous stem cells).

ND ND 86105 ND NA NA ND ND 16105 ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND None None 46104 ND ND ND None ND None None None 26104 None 1.46105 ND None None None None None None None None None ND None None None None ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND TREC 1 2 3 4 5 6

Neg ANA 1/1000 ANA 1/500 SCl-70+ SCl-70 SCl-70 (not quantified) 6

ND ND ND None None 66104

ND None ND None 66104 ND

ND 66104 ND ND ND ND

16104 ND ND ND ND ND

NA Neg ANA 1/500 Neg

ANA 1/500

Neg

ANA 1/1000

Week 172

Neg Neg ND

Week 138 Week 122

Neg ND

ANA 1/1000, Nucleoli 1/180, SCl-70+ ANA 1/500

Week 106 Week 90 Week 72

ANA 1/160, SCl-70+ ND

ANA 1/300, Nucleoli 1/180, SCl-70+ Unspecific ANA 1/1500, SCl-70+

Week 60 Week 48 Week 36 Week 24 Week 16

ANA 1/500, Nucleoli 1/120 ANA 1/500 SCl-70 (not quantified) 5

Week 2 Week 0 Patient No

Continued Table 1

NA

1789

Week 204

Letters

Normally, immune reconstitution and TREC recurrence is considerably quicker in ASCT than in allogeneic SCT.5 TREC recurrence in the allogeneic setting is known to be delayed by clinical events such as graft versus host disease,6 whereas in ASCT CD34+ selection of the graft was associated with increased thymic output (‘‘rebound phenomenon’’).2 In the present study, T cell ontogenesis was delayed even in comparison with allogeneic SCT for haematological diseases (TREC recurrence: 6 months6). Premature immunosenescence may be one of the reasons for this delay in T cell ontogenesis after ASCT in autoimmune diseases.7 8 De novo T cell ontogenesis in the thymus may be a critical event inducing relapses of the autoimmune disease, which may not be caused by peripheral expansion of memory T cells which survived the conditioning treatment, but by newly developed T cells of thymic origin. Vice versa, as in four patients TRECs recurred without relapse of the autoimmune disease, one might also argue that the occurrence of TRECs is not causally associated with relapse. Further studies of the immune reconstitution, correlating the recurrence of TRECs with T cell subsets, T cell receptor diversity, and autoantibody production in patients with autoimmune diseases after ASCT will improve our understanding of the pathogenesis of these diseases and help in the development of new therapeutic concepts. .....................

Authors’ affiliations I Ko¨tter, T Daikeler, H Einsele, S Koch, L Lochmann, L Kanz, J Lo¨ffler, Tu¨bingen University, Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine II, Otfried-Mu¨ller-Str 10, D-72076 Tu¨bingen, Germany *The first and second authors contributed equally to this work. Correspondence to: Dr I Ko ¨ tter, [email protected] Accepted 15 May 2005

REFERENCES 1 Tyndall A, Matucci-Cerinic M. Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the treatment of systemic sclerosis and other autoimmune disorders. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2003;3:1041–9. 2 Douek DC, Vescio RA, Betts MR, Brenchley JM, Hill BJ, Zhang L, et al. Assessment of thymic output in adults after haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation and prediction of T-cell reconstitution. Lancet 2000;355:1875–81. 3 Loeffler J, Bauer R, Hebart H, Douek DC, Rauser G, Bader P, et al. Quantification of T-cell receptor excision circle DNA using fluorescence resonance energy transfer and the LightCycler system. J Immunol Methods 2002;271:167–75. 4 Hazenberg MD, Verschuren MC, Hamann D, Miedema F, van Dongen JJ. T cell receptor excision circles as markers for recent thymic emigrants: basic aspects, technical approach, and guidelines for interpretation. J Mol Med 2001;79:631–40. 5 Peggs KS, Mackinnon S. Immune reconstitution following haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Br J Haematol 2004;124:407–20. 6 Hazenberg MD, Otto SA, de Pauw ES, Roelofs H, Fibbe WE, Hamann D, et al. T-cell receptor excision circle and T-cell dynamics after allogeneic stem cell transplantation are related to clinical events. Blood 2002;99:3449–53. 7 Weyand CM, Fulbright JW, Goronzy JJ. Immunosenescence, autoimmunity, and rheumatoid arthritis. Exp Gerontol 2003;38:833–41. 8 Koetz K, Bryl E, Spickschen K, O’Fallon WM, Goronzy JJ, Weyand CM. T cell homeostasis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:9203–8.

www.annrheumdis.com