Vol.3, No.1, 43-47 (2014) http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/aar.2014.31008
Advances in Aging Research
Relationship between bone mineral density, coronary risk factors, C-reactive protein, and Insulin growth factor in frail elderly Moatassem S. Amer1, Tamer M. Farid1, Hoda M. Farid1, Heba G. Saber1*, Randa A. Mabrouk2 1
Geriatrics and Gerontology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt; Corresponding Author:
[email protected] 2 Clinical Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt *
Received 19 November 2013; revised 19 December 2013; accepted 26 December 2013 Copyright © 2014 Moatassem S. Amer et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In accordance of the Creative Commons Attribution License all Copyrights © 2014 are reserved for SCIRP and the owner of the intellectual property Moatassem S. Amer et al. All Copyright © 2014 are guarded by law and by SCIRP as a guardian.
ABSTRACT Objective: This study aimed to explore the relation between bone mineral density (BMD), inflammation, coronary risk factors, and Insulin growth factor (IGF) in frail elderly. Design: A casecontrol study. Setting: Ain Shams University Hospital Cairo, Egypt. Participants: Ninety aged 60 years and above; sixty frail (30 males and 30 females; mean age 70.03 ± 8.10) and thirty matched controls (15 males and 15 females; mean age 69.07 ± 5.93). Measurements: History, examination, comprehensive geriatric assessment, measurement of BMD, and laboratory investigations including; high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) glycated haemoglobin, IGF, lowdensity lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein, total cholesterol, and triglycerides. Results: The frail group had significantly lower levels of triglycerides and LDL, hs-CRP and glycated haemoglobin levels were significantly higher (P < 0.001), and BMD and IGF levels were significantly lower when compared with the control group * (P < 0.00 , P = 0.05) respectively. We also found that BMD had a significant positive linear correlation with IGF and negative correlation with age. Conclusion: Frailty was associated with low BMD, lower triglycerides & LDL levels, and higher hsCRP levels. A borderline significance was found between IGF levels and frailty. A positive correlation was found between BMD and IGF in frail.
KEYWORDS Frailty; Bone Mineral Density; Coronary Risk Copyright © 2014 SciRes.
Factors
1. INTRODUCTION The cornerstone of geriatric medicine concerns the identification, evaluation, and treatment of frail older adults and prevention of loss of independence and other outcomes for which they are at risk. The proportion of frail within the older population is high and will increase with the aging of society [1]. Central to the frailty definition has been the concept that multiple systems must be involved. The most commonly suggested multisystem impairments involve dysregulation of neuromuscular, endocrine, and immune systems with aging. Low-level inflammation, sarcopenia, osteopenia, and nutritional changes are diagnosed, and often the presence of other contributing factors of chronic and acute illness, and environmental stresses could be found [2]. Frailty is associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis, as it involoves chronic undernutrition, sarcopenia, and reduced total energy expenditure [3]. Osteoporosis inturn increases morbidity and dependence, which in turn has a negative impact on the quality of life [4]. Low gonadal hormones and low insulin growth factor (IGF-1), combined with high peripheral levels of inflammatory mediators, cytokines, low vitamin D and pro-coagulation state enhance the risk of sarcopenia and frailty [5]. Frailty and cardiovascular disease (CVD) share a common biological pathway, and CVD may accelerate its development. Infact, frailty is identified in up to half of patients with CVD [6]. Newman et al. suggested that the relationship between frailty and CVD may be explained OPEN ACCESS
44
M. S. Amer et al. / Advances in Aging Research 3 (2014) 43-47
by two different pathways. The first explanation might be that pathological processes part of disease can lead to subclinical end organ damage, thus decreasing total physiologic reserve. The second possibility is that atherosclerosis, as a state of chronic inflammation, may result in a catabolic state with its systemic manifestations contributing to frailty [7]. The purpose of this article is to further explore the relation between bone mineral density, inflammation, IGF-1, and coronary risk factors in frail elderly Egyptians.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS 2.1. Study Design and Setting This was a case control study. The study sample comprised 90 participants aged 60 years and above. They were selected from Ain Shams University Hospital from inpatient wards and outpatient clinics. Cases included thirty frail elderly females and thirty frail elderly males diagnosed by Fried’s criteria [8] as applied by AvilaFunes et al. [9]. Controls included thirty healthy elderly subjects (15 males and 15 females) age matched with no apparent evidence of disease after full medical history and physical examination. Any patient who refused to participate in the study, patients who were suffering from acute infection, and any patients who were taking drugs that have anti-inflammatory effects as steroids, statins and aspirin were excluded from this study.
2.2. Data Collection Each patient then underwent comprehensive geriatric assessment in the form of detailed history and physical examination, cognitive function assessment by Minimental status examination (MMSE) [10] (The Arabic version used in this study was done by El-Okl et al. [11]), functional assessment by Activities of daily living (ADL) [12], Arabic version [13], and Instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) [14] (An Arabic version of the test was applied [15]), and Geriatric depression scale 15 items (GDS-15) [16] was used to screen for depression (the Arabic version of the test was applied by Shehta et al.) [17]. Frailty was defined according to the construct previously validated by Fried et al. in the Cardiovascular Health Study [8]. All five components from the original phenotype were retained; however, the metrics used to characterize the frailty criteria were slightly different and defined as follows [9]: • Shrinking—Recent and unintentional weight loss of ≥3 kg in the prior year was identified and body mass index calculated. Participants who answered ‘‘yes’’ for weight loss or had a body mass index < 21 kg/m2 were considered to be frail for this component. Copyright © 2014 SciRes.
• Poor endurance and energy—As indicated by selfreport of exhaustion, identified by two questions from the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression scale (CES-D) [18]: ‘‘I felt that everything I did was an effort’’ and ‘‘I could not get going.’’ Participants were asked: ‘‘How often, in the last week, did you feel this way?’’ 0 = rarely or none of the time; 1 = some or a little of the time; 2 = a moderate amount of the time; or 3 = most of the time. Participants answering ‘‘2’’ or ‘‘3’’ to either of these questions were considered as frail by exhaustion. • Slowness—Meets criteria for frailty if time to walk 6 m was ≥8 seconds for height ≤ 173 cm or >7 seconds for height > 173 cm in males, and ≥8 seconds for height ≤ 159 cm or >7 seconds for height > 159 cm in females. • Weakness—Participants answering ‘‘yes’’ to the following question were categorized as frail for this component: ‘‘Do you have difficulty rising from a chair?’’ • Low physical activity—A single response was used to estimate physical activity. Individuals who denied doing daily leisure activities such as walking or gardening and/or denied doing some sport activity per week were categorized as physically inactive. Those who reported doing them were considered to be active.
2.3. Laboratory Investigations Five mL whole blood was drawn from each participant after 12 hours fasting, and was divided into 2 tubes: 1 mL in EDTA-anticoagulated tube for glycated haemoglobin (HBA1C) assay, and 4 mL allowed to cloting in a plain tube. The resulting serum was used for quantitative c-reactive protein (CRP), and the remaining serum was frozen to −70˚C till assay of IGF-1. HBA1c was assayed by ion-exchange chromatographic separation and colorimetric detection kit (Biosystems, SA, Barcelona, Spain). Quantitation of CRP was performed by immunoturbidimetric assay using Biosystems CRP-hs kit (Biosystems, SA, Barcelona, Spain). IGF-1 was measured by ELISA using kits supplied by DRG (DRG international, New Jersey, USA). Lipid profile was done in the central laboratory in Ain Shams University teaching hospital.
2.4. Bone Mineral Density Measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, at the left femoral neck and lumbar spine, with the use of a Lunar DPX-L densitometer (Lunar).
2.5. Statistical Analysis Analysis of data was performed by using the 19th version of Statistical Package of Social Science (SPSS). OPEN ACCESS
M. S. Amer et al. / Advances in Aging Research 3 (2014) 43-47
Description of all data in the form of mean (M) and standard deviation (SD) for all quantitative variables. Frequency and percentage for all qualitative variables. Comparison between quantitative variables was done using t-test to compare two groups. Comparison of qualitative variables was done using Chi square test. Correlation coefficient was also done to find linear relation between different variables using Spearsman’s correlation co-efficient. Significant level measured according to P-value (Probability), P > 0.05 insignificant, P < 0.05 significant and P < 0.01 highly significant.
Table 1. Clinical characteristics of study participants.
4. DISCUSSION The current study assesses the relationship between bone mineral density, inflammation, IGF-1, and coronary risk factors in frail elderly. The findings of this study demonstrated that frail group had lower BMD, as measured by Femoral and Lumber T-scores, than the control group. This finding was consistent with previous studies [19,20]. As anticipated, we found that frail participants had significantly higher levels of hs-CRP in comparison to their healthy counterparts. Studies done by Walston et al. & Hubbard et al. had comparable results [21,22]. The results of the current study showed that frail elderly had higher HBA1C levels. The results of Blaum et al. revealed that a HbA1c level of 6.5% or greater in older women was significantly associated with higher likelihood of prefrail and frail status and that BMI, inflammation, and comorbidities did not explain the association [23]. It was found that LDL and TG levels were significantly lower in the frail participants, and there was no association with total cholesterol and HDL levels. A study conducted by Walston et al. had similar results. Copyright © 2014 SciRes.
Characteristics
Frail group
Control group
P-value
Age (years) *
70.03 ± 8.10
69.07 ± 5.93
0.41
Smoker (%)†
26
78.79
0.06
BMI
28.92 ± 6.58
27.91 ± 5.64
0.47
Total cholesterol level, mg/dL*
159.4 ± 49.33
176.9 ± 37.3
0.09
103.12 ± 42.29
121.7 ± 28.64
0.03*
*
LDL level, mg/dL* HDL level, mg/dL
3. RESULTS The clinical characteristics of the study sample are presented in Table 1; frail group had significantly lower levels of triglycerides and LDL. Hs-CRP level and glycated haemoglobin (HBA1C) were significantly higher among the frail group (P < 0.001). BMD and IGF-1 levels were significantly lower in frail group compared with the control group (P < 0.00*, P = 0.05) respectively. However there is no difference between the two studied groups regarding age, smoking status, total cholesterol, HDL level and the presence of chronic diseases. Table 2 shows the Pearson correlation analysis between BMD as measured by Femoral and Lumber Tscores with age, BMI, lipid profile, IGF, and hs-CRP level among frail group. We also found that BMD had a significant positive linear correlation with IGF and negative correlation with age.
45
*
31.85 ± 13.45
35.3 ± 6.5
0.19
Triglycerides level, mg/dL*
112.22 ± 48.06
141.3 ± 42.5
0.006*
IGF-1*
57.21 ± 17.04
68.2 ± 33.28
0.05
Hs-CRP*
15.07 ± 7.46
5.17 ± 1.69
0.00*
7.03 ± 1.63
5.52 ± 0.56
0.00*
*
−2.13 ± 0.9
−1.02 ± 1.15
0.00*
*
−2.31 ± 1.06
−1.08 ± 1.44
0.00*
HBA1C* Lumber T-score
Femoral T-score *
Mean ± Standard deviation; †Number of cases (%); BMI = body mass index; LDL = low-density lipoprotein; HDL = high-density lipoprotein; IGF = Insulin growth factor; hs-CRP= high sensitivity C-reactive protein.
Table 2. Correlation between lumbar & femoral T-scores in the frail group with age, BMI, lipid profile, IGF, CRP & HBA1C. Lumbar T-scores Age
Femoral T-scores
r
P-value
r
P-value
−0.555
