strain gauge were am- plified, displayed on an oscilloscope. (model. 1201 B; Hewlett-. Packard,. Palo. Alto, ..... 7% of RNI), whereas intakes decreased in control subjects by a mean of460. kJ/d. (1 10 kcal/d) ...... NE, Smith. EL, Gilligan. C. Effects of intra- individual and interindividual variation .... Baker. IF, Detsky. AS, Wesson.
Relationships among nutritional status and skeletal respiratory muscle function in cystic fibrosis: does dietary supplementation make a difference?13 Rhona Lorraine
M Hanning, A Moss,
ABSTRACT skeletal
Cameron and William Relationships
and
respiratory
children with cystic 95 ± 16% predicted).
among
muscle fibrosis Subjects
were muscle
were
indicated
that
respiratory
muscle
not.
changes
Thus,
and
examined
in
16
lung disease (FEy1 assigned to receive
supplementation for 6 mo. Skeletal
at 25% of normuscle strength
changes
in skeletal
muscle
strength,
and
in skeletal
use ofdietary muscle
Am
J Clin
Nutr
and
[weight (kg) voluntary 0.76, P muscle
=
7 y of
that
improved
would
result
University Studies.
1 5 y of age
Research
volunteered
for
fewer than the sample size of 24 on the following calculations: a
main outcome of interest, muscle variation of 8% in CJR Blimkie’s supplementation
Fibrosis
lung disease, and were not receiving or total parenteral nutrition. The
between
the study. which was that we had estimated
we
Cystic
at Chedoke-McMaster
strength, laboratory nutritional
in increased
has a coefficient of (1 2- 14). Because intake muscle
from
diet
strength,
a
I From the Departments of Pediatrics and Physical Education. McMaster University and the Children’s Hospital at Chedoke-McMaster, Hamilton. Ontario, Canada. 2 Supported by the Cystic Fibrosis Foundations of the United States and Canada and by an award from the National Institute of Nutrition (RMH). 3 Address reprint requests to RM Hanning. Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences. HSC 3N1 lH. McMaster University, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8N 3Z5, Canada. Received May 19. 1992. Accepted for publication October 19. 1992.
1993;57:580-7.
Printed
in USA.
© 1993 American
Society
for Clinical
Nutrition
Downloaded from www.ajcn.org by guest on July 15, 2011
and power respiratory
Oded
nutritional
function
(CF) and mild were randomly
(or not) noninvasive nutritional mal energy recommendations
analysis
JR Blimkie, M Wilson
and early
NUTRITION one-tailed
test
cepting would
of differences
a risk of a have allowed
groups.
Four
found
the
time
control
were
been
randomly
ordered
records,
basis
aerobic
cycle
sampling
and
lung
ofthe and
6 mo
ergometry, protein
takes
envelope
that
numbers.
muscle-function the
and
tests group.
initial
and
and
to take
shakes,
to achieve
for age and in addition
and
were
tinned
25% ofthe
it was emphasized to their normal
compliance, representing
puddings
according
were drink
to personal energy
and
parking
Dietary-intake
and
meal
at 6 mo. to day,
To
account
the 3 d were
expenses
for the
true
with stick-on decals. to apply each time
were
a Gulick
in the
standard
pro-
of Tanner upper arm,
and thigh,
measuring
thicknesses
modified
were
equation
limb
3-d home food diaries trial (0 mo), at 3 mo,
variation
in intake
( 16) and included
Packard,
evoked
voluntary
lean
taken
of Moritani
and
contractile
strength
measured plantar
at
and
fat cross-sectional
(MVC)
pulses
signals from an oscilloscope
Alto,
CA)
and
To
caused MVC
by prior (24).
voluntary
degree right
technique titative
day week-
paring
because have low
of increasing
occurred.
the
the
the torque
twitch
torque
by computer
until
no
effect
of twitch
contraction, unit
KE,
TI
activation
and
PF
using
after
to that
group
at baseline0
increase
was
before
determined
a modification
of the
of the
evoked
A quanby com-
electrical
isometric
in
potentiation
was measured
supramaximal
1-
Peak TI .ts square-
and McComas (25). MUA was obtained
voluntary
(ITT)]
(PDP-l
further
(MUA)
by
by Belanger of the percent
a maximal
IT
the
limbs with
gauge were am1201 B; Hewlett-
Maynard, MA). ofsingle 50-100
voltage
increment
during
terpolated
evoked
strain (model
analyzed
preclude
of motor EF,
described expression
ulation
and
for the elbow flexors (EF), knee extensors flexors (PF) at joint angles of 90#{176} by using
torque
for
properties
described previously ( 12- 14, 23). Briefly, the into custom-made dynamometers instrumented
Palo
wave
that and
from one
and
of subjects
randomly
allocated
to the
control
group
or the
diet-supplemented
All subjects Control (n=5M,5F)
Age (y) Height (cm) Height-for-age
(percentile)
Weight
(kg)
Percent
expected
weight
for age and height
(%)
Ageatdiagnosis(y)
49.4
± 27.9
of patients
expiratory
volume
with
a Tanner
in 1 s.
Stage
>
15.0
30.7
± 9.2
95.6
±
84.2
SD. Number forced
± 2.8 ±
Subjects Supplemented (n=7M,3F)
10.0 135.7
1.7±
FEV1 (% predicted)t 0
in-
slim-
contraction peak
TI
[in-
response:
1
Characteristics
t FEy,
using
spring-loaded
skinfold
03: Digital Equipment Corporation, was determined by applying a series
reimbursed.
end day ( 17, 18). Three days were considered adequate energy and protein, the main nutrients of interest,
TABLE
with
gauges. Torque displayed on
The from of the
not consecutive
by
the standards girths of the
for determining
strength
were and
strain plified,
assessment
Nutrient intake was assessed were completed at the outset
measured
with midpoint
posterior
used
(22)
procedures were fixed
intake
these foods were to be taken (1 5). To enhance and monitor
subjects were given calendars the different food supplements
gifts
and
Maximal (TT) (KE),
of supplements
recommended
that diets
were
nutrient
areas.
on the number
normal
were
measured
were
DeVries
a supplement was taken. Supplies were monitored, contact with families was maintained by telephone, and supplement use was verified from food records. On testing days all subjects received small
were
ments
blood
to receive diet supplements such as instant breakfast
instructed
weight
Anterior
Isometric
They
recommended
12.1 l.8[2]
± 26.3
1 in brackets.
10.7
± 2.4 ±
15.3
57.7
±
30.8
33.7
± 9.9
92.8
±
(n=6M,3F)
± 2.9 ±
17.1
59.4
± 21.1
10.6
± 2.5
142.0
±
62.1
±
31.3
±
10.1
33.9
±
1 1.3
97.7
±
13.4
91.9
±
19.4
81.5
2.6±2.3[3] ±
9.5 135.0
trial
Supplemented
(n=4M,3F)
142.3
101.4
Control
who c ompleted
2.1
± l.9[l] ±
13.7
16.2 29.3 10.4 1 1.6
2.9±2.3
104.9
±
[3] 17.8
Downloaded from www.ajcn.org by guest on July 15, 2011
milk
preference.
by com-
Intakes
anthropometric tape measure. These measures were used as a substitute for moment-arm in the normalization of strength measures. Limb girths and circumferential skinfold measure-
respi-
anaerobic
analysis,
(20).
this level with a Harpenden caliper. Forearm, lower leg, and foot lengths were measured on the right side of the body with an
mea-
tests,
analyzed
data
(15).
and
calf
tape.
made in both dietrecords. activity
tests,
were
File
of normal
cedures and compared Whitehouse (2 1). The
analysis.
who were allocated with grocery foods
powders,
(RNI)
intakes
Nutrient
as a percentage
Height
after
Canadian
.4 nthropometri’
and or
study
581
( 16- 19). Nutrient
the
expressed
Diet supplements Subjects provided
with
CF
to
for
of random
IN
ratios
puter
distance
muscle-function
bioimpedance
FUNCTION variance
they
recruited
subject’s
pulmonary-function
for plasma
traveling
measurements were groups: dietary-intake skeletal
and
because
a sealed
of a table
of recruitment
anthropometry, muscle-
Ac-
to diet-supplemented
unaware
the following and control
ratory
or the
within
skeletal were
time
proposed.
trial
of subjects in Table I.
a card
on the
anthropometry
surements, supplement
was
the
allocated
performing
At the
complete
for testing
by selecting
Investigators and
not
demands
groups
had
did
The characteristics the trial are outlined
Subjects
groups
MUSCLE
0.05 and /3 = 0. 10, 12 subjects per group us to detect a difference of 10% between
subjects
be excessive. completing
between
AND
582
HANNING %MUA=ITT-TT/TTX
With
only
two
measurements
measurements were lean cross-sectional limb
area
length)
..lnaerohic
and
by
the
and
limb
to correct aerobic
against
count
was
calculated. any 3-S-s
length
(estimated
advantage
(N/cm2).
Basel,
a constant recorded
force on
Switzerland) (0.08
body
a microcomputer
wt).
and
The
power
er-
patients Hamilton,
rael. is 1 5% (26-29). Each subject performed
pedal
(W)
an all-out
the rate of the drop of variation of the
could mm.
no longer The highest
peak
aerobic
maintain power
continuous,
progressive
(30). Each was increased
stage lasted until the
the cadence of 50 pedal sustained for 2 mm was
the ankle.
and
use
function
Doylestown.
and
PA)
age
(3 1 ).
plethsmograph of predicted Respiratory
re.spiratort’
and
expressed
Lung
and
end
ofthe
impedance
in CF
that
ofothers
cy2 mm, subject
resolutions/ taken as the
Plnwical
has
An assessment
of habitual
physical
from
the
method
of Bouchard
couraged the whole
activity
and The
of body
own
was
on two
entary) sion
not to change their physical-activity project. Activity patterns were
work
(36)
made
at 0, 3,
week
days
to 5 (athletic)
and
incorporated
graded
and
technician were en-
patterns from
as a covariant
during 1 (sedin regres-
analyses.
were St Paul,)
Fasting
was measured Instrument Co.
ofpredicted
measured
analyses
in
values whole-body
and expressed
as percent
and
blood
the
samples
plasma
was
was mouth
assessed
at end
pressures
during
expiration 5-s efforts
with
correction
for absolute
the previously measured percent ofpredicted total
of 10
5
three
with efforts
of effort
percent cycles
volume
by using
value of fixed residual capacity as a lung capacity (33). Respiratory muscle
endurance was measured (35). Briefly, 18 repeated as the
lung
repeated static were performed
and
decline held
5 s of rest. in strength
for
maximal by using
efforts a fixed-
Endurance with
1 s during
the the
was largest
ex-
value
10-s effort
and
the largest of the last two cycles held for 1 s during the effort. RE was measured immediately after respiratory-strength assessment and inspiratory function was measured before expiratory function. A 2-5-mm rest was taken between inspiratory and expiratory maneuvers. Four CF subjects dinate their efforts to complete the RE control
subjects
Body
composition
were
composition
37) by using
not
asked
was the
Valhalla
were unable test. The two
to perform
assessed apparatus
the
endurance
by bioelectrical model
to cooryoungest test.
impedance l990A
(Valhalla
were
obtained
separated
in the and
morning
stored
at -70
#{176}C until analyzed. Plasma albumin was measured by the bromcresol green dye-binding technique (39) with a Unicam spectrophotometer (Cambridge. UK). Transthyretin (prealbumin) and retinol-binding
protein
munosorbent
maximal
(5 mL)
immediately
were
assay
sured by reversed-phase Millford, MA) with
measured
Differences
Because
by enzyme-linked
(40).
HPLC precolumn
(Waters. Millipore Corporation. derivitization with phenyliso-
norleucine
as internal
in muscle
the current
Amino
strength
goal
and
acids
im-
(ELISA)
trol groups at 0 and 6 mo were analysis of variance (ANOVA). as statistically significant.
Body
as a measure by our
et al (38)
values
(36.
body water, calculation.
one weekend day. These were reviewed by the exercise with follow-up phone calls when indicated. Subjects
analysis
first
was
activit’i
Statistical
of the
Care
(37).
and
cycle
metatarsal.
supported
thiocyanate
pressed
third
analysis
been
as described by Lands et al (33). The test was repeated until a maximal effort was reached. This usually occurred within threefive efforts. Maximal pressures had to be maintained for 1 s. Values were expressed as cm H2O and as percent of predicted
duty
fre-
surfaces between
and 6 mo. This was an essential component ofthe study because functional muscle changes may also be induced by changes in activity level. Subjects completed a log oftheir activities, modified
strength
as a percent
volumes
static
muscle
in 1 s (FEy1) II: S and M
(Med Graphics. values (32). muscle strength
by measuring
(34)
a signal
power.
Forced expiratory volume by spirometry (Pulmo-Screen for
at the distal
of bioelectrical
Laboratory Pulmonary
and
was
seen at the Children’s Exercise and the Wingate Institute, Is-
cling test on the Fleisch ergometer at the end of which the power
tA.
were
mea-
standard.
between
supplement
and
measure
ofgood
nutritional
sta-
tus in CF is the achievement of normal growth, the data analyzed statistically to determine which variables were predictive
of a favorable
growth
analysis was used to determine were most predictive of baseline height
for
age
and
which
growth velocity in weight We decided a priori that the outcome sures, height)
categories
outcome. which weight
variables
ofthe
elbow
flexors.
Stepwise-regression
best
over the 6-mo only the single
predicted
mean
expiratory
changes
experimental variable from markers.
most highly with in the regression
possible because all outcome measures significantly correlated with each other. regression equation were energy intake MVC
were most
of the baseline variables as a percent of ideal for
(eg. biochemical
etc) that correlated would be included
con-
assessed by repeated-measures A P value < 0.05 was accepted
strength
growth analysis.
in
period. each of
(weight This
meafor was
within categories were Variables used in the as a percent of RNI. pressure.
mean
and
Downloaded from www.ajcn.org by guest on July 15, 2011
results in pediatric Nutrition Centre,
of 800
the distal prominences ofthe radius and ulna, distal end of the third metacarpal. between the median and lateral melleioli at
composition
The indexes of interest were peak power attained in interval. mean power (endurance) throughout the 30-
test. and rate of fatigue, determined from off of power. The interindividual coefficient
at a current
and the average values of impedance (1). total fat-free body mass were taken for subsequent
for 30 s at maximal
kp/kg
Diego)
taken to ensure that the upper limbs did not touch other parts ofthe body and that the thighs did not touch each other. Subjects voided before testing. Measurements were repeated in duplicate
was conducted after standardized Subjects pedaled on a cycle
5
test and
strength Strength
(N . m/kg). limb product of limb
moment-arm
San
quency of 50 kHz. Electrodes were placed on the dorsal ofthe right side according to bony landmarks as follows:
potter
(Fleisch-Metabo.
speed
and
investigator.
for mechanical
The Wingate anaerobic test warm-up procedures (26-28). gometer
same
normalized for body mass area (N . m/cm2), and the
lean cross-sectional from
all anthropometric
made
AL
Scientific,
100
exceptions,
were
El
NUTRITION maximum
anaerobic
plasma
transthyretin.
physical
activity.
predicted) Analyses Angeles).
and
aerobic
power,
Covariant sex, and
percent
effects
pulmonary
AND body
of Tanner
function
MUSCLE
fat, and
Stage,
(FEV1
,
FUNCTION
usual
as percent
Growth
were tested. were conducted with BMDPstatistical software (Los Results are presented as mean ± SD unless otherwise
noted.
and
and (Table
values The
estimates
analysis
ranged
stepwise
centage
of expected
significantly muscle
muscle
strength.
a 6-mo intake
change -
and
height
intake,
(r
relationships
with
0.05)
0.05) Amino
in energy equa-
similar
for Tanner
EF. 0.49
+
(.s MVC,
Dietary for
energy
age.
sex,
baseline both
Fig
groups
the RNI. in energy group control
expressed
as percent
height
( 1 5) were
similar
± 22%
respectively:
vs 106
3). Intakes
at baseline Dietary intakes
(to
122
and
± 21%,
control were
other
±
1 7%
nutrients
by a mean
kJ/d
at
vs supplemented, a230%
of RNI
also
intakes
well
in
P
in
0.05). Change 6 mo was significantly
in
control at 6 mo. P < 0.05).
properties
expiratory
spectively, cm
H2O,
air
(PEmax)
different
between
at baseline I 16.2
±
pressures.
control (4 1 , 42):
50.5%
and
and Plmax
vs 124.8
RE
were
supplemented (82.
not
1 ± 2 1 . 1 vs 93.4
± 35.7%),
PEmax
signifi-
groups, (93.7
re-
± 20.0 ±
19.7
vs 93.8 ± 21.7 cm H2O, 103.7 ± 27.7% vs 81.0 ± 17.9%), RE (12. 1 ± 2 1.3% vs 2 1.7 ± 1 3.4% decline). There was also no significant change in Plmax, PEmax, or RE over time. Respiratory function as FE1 (percent predicted) at 6 mo was 77.2
±
groups, baseline
I 3.5%
and
respectively, (Table
95.2
±
which
19.0% was
in control not
significantly
and
supplemented different
from
were gain
apparent and
gain over 6 mo was posenergy intake (percent
fa-
in children
with
a smaller
muscle
CF is similar group
(ad-
CF patients force was
with nega(43). muscle
studies marker
been
used
obese
subjects
(7- 1 1 ) in which of malnutrition.
to monitor and
nutritional
individuals
with
muscle-function abnormalities in body composition or serum significant
muscle
strength
correlation in the
between
current
study
when conventional indexes of nutritional composition and plasma protein biochemThese results indicate that even in relaadolescents with CF. changes in the groups. such as the EF. can serve as in nutritional status. muscle
in patients
with
function
in response
CF should
be specific
to stim-
to the effects
ofnutritional status and independent ofthe effects oflung disease (44) or infection (45). Because recent dietary intake has been found to influence muscle-strength testing (46), measurements in the present ing may
also
study
were
influence
covariant adjustment and energy intake
obtained
2 h postprandially.
muscle-strength
Train-
measurements.
However,
ofthe relationship between muscle for changes in habitual activity did
strength not alter
the statistical significance ofthe association in the present The measures of skeletal muscle strength. anaerobic and with
endurance, CF were
below
those
CF. weight dietary
for
(8. 9). The
in skeletal
tests
and aerobic exercise generally within normal of healthy
tions, muscle If nutritional
Discussion
also
tively healthy children and strength of skeletal muscle a marker for early changes ulation
pattern muscle
of pulmonary function (43). Differprobably explain the discrepancy be-
skeletal
occurred at a time status such as body istry were unchanged.
altered
increased
by more severe malnutrition severely malnourished groups
in starved
47). Thus, in this disease consuming
1).
This study demonstrated that itively associated with increased
has
and
has been in adults
in malnourished patients with failure, and obesity (7- 1 1 ). Our
nervosa reversed the 2-4 wk, before changes
Differences covariant effect of the change on group differences in skeletal muscle strength, power, or endurance. Respiratory muscle strength, as maximal inspiratory (Plmax) cantly
however, and more
function
proteins weight
as a per-
muscle. status
in adolescent and young adult of mild malnutrition. Muscle
Refeeding
anorexia within
6
and
our results and those of other function was shown as a sensitive
change.
status as the failure
muscle been
function
of similar
ages
in the subjects or only slightly
( 1 2-
1 4,
26,
29,
group of patients with mild to moderate lung energy at 100% of normal recommenda-
function status
malnutrition used
children
capacity ranges
study. power
did does
may and
to indicate
not appear to be impaired. indeed relate to muscle function
have
ultimately respiratory
a negative prognosis. muscle
impact
on
Nmax
and
strength
in
respiratory PEmax
in CF (43,
have 48-
Downloaded from www.ajcn.org by guest on July 15, 2011
20
in skeletal
not be a useful means at any point in time in
(7- 1 1). An
function
et al (43)
function was independent ences in nutritional status
0
and
conditions
muscle
tively influenced, In both the mild
0
MVC disease.
weight
contractile
characteristics been observed chronic renal
to that
ductor pollicis) a similar degree
240
0
of clinical
contractile
tigueability anorexia
lung
in nutritional Nevertheless,
fatigue characteristics of the adductor pollicis investigated as a functional index of nutritional 0
(EF
to moderate
height and age suggests that serial measurestrength may serve as a useful functional index
these patients. Muscle function,
30
our
strength
ofexpected ofmuscle
muscle
CF and
supported
ofchanges of assessing
60
w
increased
with
strength would reflect by growth in subjects
of baseline
90
and
in children
NUTRITION
TABLE Plasma
2 protein
biochemistry
in subjects
randomly
AND
allocated
MUSCLE
to the control Control
(n
FUNCTION
group =
46 0.31 25
(mg/L)
± ±
EAA:TAA
0.307
Valine:g1ycine Taurine(mol/L)
0.771 ± 53±25
±
group
at 0 and 6 mo
Supplemen
7)
6 mo
4 0.14 10 0.019 0.167
±
585
CF
or the diet-supplemented
Baseline Albumin (gIL) Transthyretin (g/L) Retinol-binding protein
IN
43 0.17
± ±
18
23 ±
0.325 0.784 51
±
9)
=
6 mo
Baseline
4 0.0Sf 4 0.023 0.1 19
± ±
ted (n
49 0.30 32 0.302 0.820
5 0.15 9 0.33 0.256
± ± ± ± ±
55±
44 0.19 28 0.326 0.836
14
± 3t
0.03 6 0.024 0.185
± ± ± ±
43±8
SD.
0
t Significant change over time: § Ratio of essential amino acids
< 0.05, jP to total amino
tP