relationships between knowledge and diagnosis

1 downloads 0 Views 346KB Size Report
REFERENCES. Ferreira, V. (1998). A Observação Qualitativa. Determinismo de variáveis de presságio na competência de observação de diagnóstico em ...
SPORT PEDAGOGY:

RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN KNOWLEDGE AND DIAGNOSIS VARIABLES IN ACROBATIC GYMNASTICS COACHES’ Elsa Nunes & Vítor Ferreira * Technical University of Lisbon

Faculty of Human Kinetics

INTRODUCTION

RESULTS

The Sport Pedagogy has show interested to know how some kind of variables had relationships with the detection of movement deviations (i.e., technical mistakes).

In the general and total of knowledge the group 1 mean is higher than the group 2 but in the specific knowledge the order is inverted; the specific knowledge mean is always higher than the general knowledge in both groups.

In this study, we selected a few knowledge and diagnosis variables .

AIESEP CONGRESS A Coruña (Spain), 22 to 25

Figure 1— general

and specific Knowledge knowledge in total a c r o b a t i c g y m n a s t i c s specific (means).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Non-graduate coaches (Group 2) Graduate coaches (Group 1)

general 0

10

20

30

October 2002.

The main objectives of this study were: Contacts 1) studied two selected technical abilities, which are Vítor Ferreira characteristic of the acrobatic (PhD) gymnastics: a) balance – inside Faculdade de ascension into inverted facial Motricidade support (B/IFS); b) dynamics – Humana mortal to the rear guard of rise da Universidade fatigue with reception on the Técnica de Lisboa. ground (D/M). Estrada da Costa. 2) compare the relationships 1495-688 Cruz between selected knowledge Quebrada variables and selected (Lisboa). Portugal. movement diagnosis variables.

The more type of errors identified in each skill were the principal errors and the group 1 have a higher mean; the false alarms were identified by each groups but the group 2 have identified more than the group 1. Inverted facial suport (B/IFS)

Mortal (D/M)

False alarms

False alarms

Non-graduate coaches (Group 2)

minor faltes

minor faltes

Graduate coaches (Group 1)

Secundary errors

Secundary errors

Principal errors

Principal errors 0

0,5

1

1,5

2

Non-graduate coaches (Group 2)

2,5

Graduate coaches (Group 1)

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

Figure 2— diagnosis variables: errors identified in the two skill’s (B/IFS and D/M).

Telef.: 351 214149195; [email protected]

The sample consisted of 25 individuals, all acrobatic gymnastics coaches, who were Balance divided into two groups: inside ascension into inverted facial a)graduate coaches – n=13 (group 1); support (B/IFS). b)and, non-graduate coaches – n=12 (group 2). The instruments were resort: a)a test to assess knowledge; b) an observation test. Both were created and validated for this purpose.

Dynamics mortal to the rear The statistics tests Bravaisguard of rise Pearson were used (with fatigue with p