Jul 12, 2006 - Brad D. Barrowsâ¡, Stuart M. Haslam§, Larry J. Bischofâ¡, Howard R. Morris§¶, Anne Dell§1, and Raffi V. Aroianâ¡2. From the â¡Section of Cell and ...
THE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY VOL. 282, NO. 5, pp. 3302–3311, February 2, 2007 © 2007 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. Printed in the U.S.A.
Resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis Toxin in Caenorhabditis elegans from Loss of Fucose* Received for publication, July 12, 2006, and in revised form, November 9, 2006 Published, JBC Papers in Press, November 29, 2006, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M606621200
Brad D. Barrows‡, Stuart M. Haslam§, Larry J. Bischof ‡, Howard R. Morris§¶, Anne Dell§1, and Raffi V. Aroian‡2 From the ‡Section of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0349, § Division of Molecular Biosciences, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom, and ¶M-SCAN Research and Training Center, Silwood Park, Ascot SL5 7PZ, United Kingdom
The crystal (Cry)3 proteins made by Bacillus thuringiensis are naturally occurring agents that are used for the control of insects that eat crops and carry disease (1). Cry proteins have been used for over 50 years as an environmentally safe and effective alternative to synthetic pesticides. One attractive feature of Cry proteins is their nontoxicity toward mammals and other vertebrates (2). Consistent with this lack of mammalian toxicity, several of the receptors for Cry proteins have been
* This
work was supported by National Science Foundation Grant MCB-0517718 (to R. V. A.), the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, and Wellcome Trust grants (to A. D., H. R. M., and S. M. H.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. 1 Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council Professorial Fellow. 2 To whom correspondence should be addressed: Section of Cell and Developmental Biology, 9500 Gilman Dr., Dept. 0349, Bonner Hall 4430, La Jolla, CA 92093-0349. Tel.: 858-822-1396; Fax: 858-822-3021; E-mail: raroian@ucsd. edu. 3 The abbreviations used are: Cry, crystal; GMD, GDP-mannose-4,6-dehydratase; MALDI, matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization; MS, mass spectrometry; PNGase, peptide:N-glycosidase; RNAi, RNA interference; dsRNA, double-stranded RNA; PnPP, p-nitrophenyl phosphate; LC, lethal concentration.
3302 JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
characterized and encode invertebrate-specific glycolipids and/or an insect family of cadherins (3). Because of their efficacy against invertebrates and safety toward vertebrates, Cry proteins are widely used worldwide as topical sprays on crops, as topical sprays to kill mosquitoes and black flies that carry disease, and as transgenes expressed in plants as an environmentally friendly alternative to chemical pesticides (4, 5). In the year 2005, over 26 million hectares of B. thuringiensis transgenic corn and cotton were planted (6). In addition, B. thuringiensis crystal proteins are now also being explored for their possible use in the control of nematode parasites (7, 8). In our efforts to gain insight into the important question of how invertebrates develop resistance to Cry proteins, we isolated mutations in five Caenorhabditis elegans genes that result in resistance to the crystal protein, Cry5B (9). Four of these bre genes have been cloned and characterized. These genes, bre-2, bre-3, bre-4, and bre-5, encode glycosyltransferase genes that catalyze the addition of monosaccharides onto invertebratespecific glycolipids (10 –12). The resulting oligosaccharide chain is a receptor for the Cry protein (11). Thus, loss of any one of these genes results in loss of the receptor for the toxin and a high level of resistance. Here we clone the fifth bre gene, bre-1, and characterize its phenotype. bre-1 mutant animals are resistant to Cry5B but at a lower level than the other bre mutants. Mutation of the bre-1 gene comes at a significant cost to the animal and includes a small brood size at 25 °C. bre-1 encodes a protein with significant homology to GDP-mannose 4,6-dehydratase (GMD), a cytosolic enzyme involved in the biosynthesis of GDP-fucose. This inferred enzymatic function is supported by fucose rescue experiments that also demonstrate that C. elegans lacks an alternative pathway for production of GDP-fucose, the fucose salvage pathway. bre-1 mutant animals show qualitative and quantitative defects in the production of glycolipid receptors for Cry5B, explaining its resistance phenotype. bre-1 mutant animals have overall very low levels of fucose and appear to be lacking fucosylated N- and O-glycans. C. elegans can evidently survive with little protein fucosylation.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES C. elegans Maintenance and Microscopy—C. elegans N2 and other strains were maintained on standard NG plates spread with the Escherichia coli strain OP50 (13). bre-1(ye4) was outcrossed six times to N2 prior to the work conducted here. All nematode assays were carried out at 20 °C unless otherwise noted. Nematodes were mounted for microscopy on 2% agarVOLUME 282 • NUMBER 5 • FEBRUARY 2, 2007
Downloaded from www.jbc.org at Biomedical Library, UCSD on March 22, 2007
A mutation in the Caenorhabditis elegans bre-1 gene was isolated in a screen for Bacillus thuringiensis toxin-resistant (bre) mutants to the Cry5B crystal toxin made by B. thuringiensis. bre-1 mutant animals are different from the four other cloned bre mutants in that their level of resistance is noticeably lower. bre-1 animals also display a significantly reduced brood size at 25 °C. Here we cloned the bre-1 gene and characterized the bre-1 mutant phenotype. bre-1 encodes a protein with significant homology to a GDP-mannose 4,6-dehydratase, which catalyzes the first step in the biosynthesis of GDP-fucose from GDP-mannose. Injection of GDP-fucose but not fucose into C. elegans intestinal cells rescues bre-1 mutant phenotypes. Thus, C. elegans lacks a functional fucose salvage pathway. Furthermore, we demonstrate that bre-1 mutant animals are defective in production of fucosylated glycolipids and that bre-1 mutant animals make quantitatively reduced levels of glycolipid receptors for Cry5B. We finally show that bre-1 mutant animals, although viable, show a lack of fucosylated N- and O-glycans, based on mass spectrometric evidence. Thus, C. elegans can survive with little fucose and can develop resistance to crystal toxin by loss of a monosaccharide biosynthetic pathway.
Loss of Fucose and Cry5B Resistance in C. elegans TABLE 1 Primers used to create PCR constructs for bre-1 rescue experiments Gene C53B4.1 C53B4.2 C53B4.3 C53B4.4 C53B4.5 C53B4.6 C53B4.7 C53B4.9
Primer 1 location IV 8967784 cgtcgagatggaagatgaagtattc IV 8964987 catttaaaaggacttggaccacaa IV 8968814 ggcctaaatgggtgattttcaat IV 8970446 gaaaatgattggacaaacgaatgat IV 8976751 caatattccaggcttcaccacc IV 8984094 gcccattcctaaatgttttcttatt IV 8986609 ccgcatttgttttcattgga IV 8992651 gggcgcgagtaggactaattataaa
Primer 2 location IV 8973694 gactaggattccccaattgatttc IV 8968228 caaaatgtccgtgcaaagtca IV 8975680 ggcccactcaatttcctgaa IV 8985509 gtagtgtgccctgaatgtttgatt IV 8981829 ggagttgatggtgttgcatttg IV 8987246 cattttgatcagccatttttactct IV 8993229 gaccaaccacaaatacaaagctact IV 8995530 gaacatttcttttcactctcttctttctt
FEBRUARY 2, 2007 • VOLUME 282 • NUMBER 5
Upstream
kb
kb
kb
2.3
0.34
3.1
1.7
1.1
0.34
2.3
2
2
3.1
0.75
0.9
2
2
1.8
0.75
0.59
3.0
0.6
2.9
0.12
2
2
10.4
Downstream
open reading frames from the cosmid were PCR-amplified, using the primers listed in Table 1, and tested for their ability to rescue bre-1(ye4) as described above. C53B4.7 was found to be the only gene capable of rescue (8/8 lines). For final rescue experiments, animals were placed on a isopropyl -D-thiogalactoside/carbenicillin NG plate spread with a 60/40 dilution of E. coli expressing Cry5B(without mutation):E. coli transformed with vector alone. cDNA was isolated from total bre-1(ye4) RNA and used for sequencing the bre-1(ye4) gene. SL-1 was used as the leading primer for 5⬘ sequencing, and oligo(dT) was used as the reverse primer for 3⬘ sequencing. Cry5B Lethal Concentration Assay—Cry5B was purified from B. thuringiensis using a sucrose gradient as described (15) and solubilized in 20 mM Hepes (pH 8.0) just prior to setting up the lethality assay. The Cry5B lethality assay was performed as described (16). Cry5B was tested with N2 and bre-1(ye4) worms at the L4 stage using a range of Cry5B from 0.312 to 120 g of Cry5B/ml. Worm viability was scored after 8 days at 20 °C. Each individual assay was set up in triplicate for each concentration of Cry5B. Three independent individual assays were performed. Probit analysis (17) was used to calculate the lethal concentration (LC) of Cry5B that killed 50 and 90% of the worms (LC50 and LC90, respectively). The mean values from the individual assays were compared using a paired t test to determine statistical significance. A probability value of less than 0.05 was set as significant. For graphical representation of the lethality assays, a nonlinear regression analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, San Diego). RNA-mediated Interference (RNAi) by Injection—20 rrf3(pk1426) L4 worms were plated and incubated 12 h for each of the injection samples. After the 12-h incubation, 10 worms were injected for each of the injection samples. Injections were performed as described previously. Each injected worm was plated individually and allowed 24 h of recovery time at 15 °C. At this point the worms were transferred to new individual plates and incubated at 20 °C for an additional 24 h. Progeny obtained more than 48 h after injection were allowed to grow to the L4 stage at which point 20 were transferred to plates seeded with E. coli expressing Cry5Bm. After an additional 48 h, the response to toxin was observed. In addition, three L4 worms were picked out to individual plates for each injection sample and tested for brood size. The brood size assay was performed JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
3303
Downloaded from www.jbc.org at Biomedical Library, UCSD on March 22, 2007
ose pads with 0.1% sodium azide. Images were acquired using an Olympus BX60 microscope using the ⫻10 objective linked to a ⫻0.5 camera mount and a DVC Co. camera. Brood Size Assay—L4 stage worms from N2 and bre-1(ye4) were picked one each to three plates and incubated at 25 °C for 24-h periods. After each period, the originally picked worms would be picked to a new plate. Progeny from the original parent worms were allowed to grow an additional 24 h at 25 °C before they were counted. This process was continued every 24 h until the original parents ceased to produce additional progeny. The results for this assay include three independent replicates (total of nine worms). Cloning bre-1(ye4)—bre-1(ye4) was mapped between unc24(e138) and dpy-20(e1282) using standard three-factor mapping. An unc-24(e138)bre-1(ye4)dpy-20(e1282) triple mutant was then made in order to perform single nucleotide polymorphism mapping with the Hawaiian strain (CB4856) (14). Single nucleotide polymorphism mapping narrowed the search to a region covered by three cosmids (D1046, C53B4, and C53D6). Purified cosmid from the three cosmid strains were injected with the rol-6 marker (pRF4) into bre-1(ye4) young adults. All injection experiments were performed on a Zeiss Axiovert 100 microscope using an Eppendorf microinjector. rol-6 alone was used to inject N2 and bre-1 worms to control for any other possible phenotypes produced by this marker. These controls showed no deviation from expected phenotypes. Stable lines obtained from injections were tested for rescue from resistance to Cry5B by plating onto NG plates containing 0.25 mM isopropyl -D-thiogalactoside and 50 g/ml carbenicillin spread with E. coli strain JM103 with a pQE9 vector expressing a form of the Cry5B toxin called Cry5Bm. Cry5Bm is a slightly attenuated form of Cry5B that contains two mutations in the toxin domain (N172I and E248K). bre-1 mutant animals (as well as bre-2, -3, -4, and -5 mutant animals) are resistant to both wild type and attenuated forms of Cry5B. However, because the level of resistance of bre-1 mutant animals is lower than that of the other bre mutants, we found it simpler to score bre-1 resistance using attenuated Cry5Bm when the number of worms to assay was limited, i.e. following injections for RNAi and following injections for sugars rescue experiments (Fig. 2B and Fig. 3). After finding C53B4 as the only one of the three cosmids capable of rescuing the bre-1 phenotype (6/6 lines), each of the
Open reading frame
Loss of Fucose and Cry5B Resistance in C. elegans TABLE 2 Primers used to prepare dsRNA from bre-1 and F56H6.5 for RNAi injection experiments Gene
Primer 1 location
Primer 2 location
PCR product
C53B4.7
IV 8987281 taatacgactcactataggg atgcgaaaattgagggtcttga I 12292533 taatacgactcactataggg ggtttgggaaggcgaaggtgt
IV 8990219 taatacgactcactataggg tgtcgcttgcaaccatctct I 12292315 taatacgactcactataggg cgctagccaccatttctttgac
1.230
kb
F56H6.5
3304 JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
blocking buffer for 45 min. Wells were washed twice with bovine serum albumin-free block solution and once with water. p-Nitrophenyl phosphate (PnPP) was then added at a concentration of 1 mg/ml in PnPP buffer (50 mM HCO3, 0.5 mM MgCl2 (pH 10)). After positive control wells reached an A405 of 1, 3 M NaOH was added to each well to stop the color reaction. Three control wells were used to determine the A405 at three 10-min time points (10, 20, and 30 min) during the PnPP incubation. Control wells generally reached an A405 of 1 after 30 min with PnPP. A405 measurements were then taken for all wells. Background was determined by setting up duplicate wells with a 100-fold excess of unlabeled activated toxin for all worm numbers. Each condition was represented by three wells in each of three replicates. Monosaccharide Analysis of Worm Pellets—Large populations of worms were grown on 100-mm ENG plates spread with E. coli strain OP50. Before the populations starved, they were washed from the plates with water and transferred to a Falcon tube producing a pellet volume of ⬃1 ml. Collected worm pellets were washed eight times with water. Pellets were then treated using standard protocols (40). Structural Analysis of Glycoproteins—Worm pellets were acquired as described above under “Monosaccharide Analysis of Worm Pellets.” The worm pellets were sonicated in an extraction buffer consisting of 0.5% (w/v) cetyltrimethylammonium bromide and 0.1 M Tris (pH 7.4). Material for analysis was extracted for an additional 24 h on a rocker at 4 °C. Solid debris was removed by centrifugation at 1400 ⫻ g for 10 min. Detergent was removed by extensive dialysis against 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate buffer (pH 7.6). After dialysis the samples were lyophilized. Reduction and protection of the disulfide bridges of the extracted proteins were carried out as described (19). The reduced carboxymethylated proteins were trypsinized and digested with PNGase F (EC 3.5.1.52; Roche Applied Science) as described (20). Glycopeptides remaining after PNGase F digestion were further digested with PNGase A (EC 3.5.1.52; Roche Applied Science), in ammonium acetate buffer (50 mM, pH 5.0), for 16 h at 37 °C using 0.2 milliunits of the enzyme. The reaction was terminated by lyophilization, and the products were purified on a C18 cartridge. O-Linked oligosaccharides were liberated from glycopeptides after PNGase F and A digestion by reductive elimination (400 l of 1 M NaBH4 in 0.05 M NaOH at 45 °C for 16 h) and desalted through a Dowex 50W-X8(H) column. Excess borates were removed by coevaporation with 10% (v/v) acetic acid in methanol under a stream of nitrogen. Chemical Derivatization for MALDI-MS—Permethylation using the sodium hydroxide procedure was performed as VOLUME 282 • NUMBER 5 • FEBRUARY 2, 2007
Downloaded from www.jbc.org at Biomedical Library, UCSD on March 22, 2007
as described above. The double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) fragments were made from RNA purified from N2 worms. The dsRNA fragments were amplified using T7-linked primers (see Table 2) with an Ambion T7 polymerase kit. dsRNAs were injected at a concentration of 2 mg/ml. Fucose Rescue Experiments—12 worms were injected for each sugar. bre-1(ye4) and bre-2(ye31) L4 worms were injected with 2.5 mM solutions of either L-fucose (F1395; Sigma) or GDP--L-fucose (371443; Calbiochem) in water. All of the injected worms were then transferred to NG OP50 plates and allowed to recover for 2 h at 15 °C. After recovery, eight worms were transferred to Cry5Bm toxin plates prepared as described above. The other four worms were transferred to similar plates spread with the same strain of bacteria with an empty vector. After 48 h worms were mounted and imaged as described above. This experiment was independently repeated three times. Preparation of Lipids and TLC Analyses—Lipids were prepared, separated by TLC, and probed with biotinylated Cry5B as described (11, 18). Ulex europaeus Fucose-binding Lectin Overlay—Plates of resolved glycolipids were fixed with polyisobutylmethacrylate and blocked in phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin and 0.02% Tween 20 for 30 min. After blocking, the plate was washed for 1 min and again for 5 min with a tissue-staining buffer (10 mM Hepes (pH 7.5), 0.15 M NaCl). The plate was then probed with a 10 g/ml solution of biotinylated U. europaeus lectin (B-1065; Vector Laboratories) in tissue staining buffer for a period of 2 h. The remaining steps are the same as those performed for the Cry5B overlay experiments (11). Analysis of Glycolipid Affinity for Cry5B—Glycolipids were purified as described (11) from mixed stage worm pellets in which the total number of worms was quantitated by sampling worm quantities in several small aliquots. Upper phase glycolipids were dissolved in a solution of 1/1 (methanol:water). Solution volumes, representative of a specific number of worms, were then transferred to a 96-well polystyrene microtiter plate (Costar 9017, medium binding). This solution was allowed to evaporate at room temperature for a period of 135 min. Any remaining solution was removed and replaced with blocking solution (42 mM Na2HPO4, 85 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgSO4, 0.2% defatted bovine serum albumin) and allowed to block for 30 min. The wells were then probed with 22 nM elastase-activated, biotinylated Cry5B in blocking solution for 1 h at room temperature. Cry5B protoxin was activated and labeled as described (11). The wells were then washed twice with blocking buffer and incubated with an alkaline phosphatase solution in
0.235
Loss of Fucose and Cry5B Resistance in C. elegans
FEBRUARY 2, 2007 • VOLUME 282 • NUMBER 5
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
3305
Downloaded from www.jbc.org at Biomedical Library, UCSD on March 22, 2007
genes, bre-2, -3, -4, and -5, were also isolated. Resistance of bre-1(ye4) animals relative to wild-type animals can be readily seen at a 60% dose of Cry5B-expressing E. coli (Fig. 1, A and B). As demonstrated previously (9), resistance of bre-1 mutant animals is less than that of animals mutant for the other four bre genes, such as bre-2 (Fig. 1C). Based on LC90 and LC50 values, bre1(ye4) mutant animals are 3.2- and 2.2-fold, respectively, more resistant to purified Cry5B than wild type (Fig. 1D; p ⫽ 0.036 for LC90 and 0.0173 for LC50). bre-1(ye4) mutant animals also produce small brood sizes at 25 °C (Table 3). There thus appears to be a steeper cost to the FIGURE 1. bre-1(ye4) animals are resistant to Cry5B. A–C, left panels, L4 worms from each strain after feeding nematode for mutation of the bre-1 on E. coli transformed with an empty vector and pictured at 48 h. A–C, right panels, worms from each strain pictured after 48 h on toxin plates, which were spread with a mixed culture consisting of 60% E. coli expressing gene when compared with most of Cry5B and 40% E. coli transformed with an empty vector. This illustrates the intermediate resistance of bre-1 the other bre mutants (Table 3). relative to N2 wild type and bre-2 through the extent of growth achieved from the L4 stage after 48 h of toxin Interestingly, bre-3 mutant animals exposure. D, Cry5B lethality assay with N2 and bre-1 (ye4). The percentage of living worms as a function of Cry5B concentration was plotted using nonlinear regression. Each point represents the mean and standard deviation also display low progeny production from the three lethality assays that were used in the probit calculations. at 25 °C (Table 3). The lower level of resistance and the brood size defects TABLE 3 associated with the bre-1 mutant suggested that the bre-1 gene Averaged results and S.D. for the three independent brood size could encode a protein that is dissimilar to the four other bre assays genes, all of which encode glycosyltransferases. Total progeny at 25 °C S.D. for three Strain The bre-1 gene was mapped using the bre-1(ye4) allele in (average of three replicates) replicates (ⴞ) standard three-factor and single-nucleotide polymorphism N2 214 20 techniques to an interval covered by three cosmids on chromobre-1(ye4) 25 4 some IV. All three cosmids were injected into bre-1(ye4) anibre-2(ye31) 192 19 bre-3(ye28) 36 7 mals, and only one, C53B4, resulted in rescue of bre-1 resistance bre-41(ye13) 187 14 to toxin phenotype. Injection of PCR fragments that contain all bre-5(ye17) 206 24 open reading frames, including their putative promoters and 3⬘-untranslated regions on C53B4, identified C53B4.7 as the described (19). After derivatization, the reaction products were only rescuing gene (Fig. 2A). Further confirmation that purified on a Sep-Pak C18 (Waters) as described (19). MALDI C53B4.7 and bre-1 are synonymous is provided by the following data were acquired using a PerSeptive Biosystems Voyager- facts: 1) injection of double-stranded C53B4.7 RNA into rrfDETM STR mass spectrometer in the reflectron mode with 3(pk1426) animals recapitulates the bre-1 resistance to toxin delayed extraction. Derivatized glycans were dissolved in 10 l phenotype (Fig. 2B; rrf-3(pk1426) animals show normal of methanol, and 1 l of dissolved sample was premixed with 1 response to Cry5B (21) and are more sensitive to dsRNA), and l of matrix (2,5-dihydrobenzoic acid) before loading onto a 2) bre-1(ye4) animals show a mutation of Gly217 to Glu in the C53B4.7 open reading frames (Fig. 2C). Injection of the target plate. Structural Analysis of Freed Glycans from Glycosphingolipid— C53B4.7 fragment also rescues the reduced brood size phenoUpper phase glycosphingolipids were collected from bre-1 type associated with bre-1(ye4) (not shown). bre-1 encodes a putative enzyme with significant homology worms as described under “Preparation of Lipids and TLC Analyses.” Upper phase glycosphingolipid head groups were to GMD. This enzyme has been characterized in humans as enzymatically released as described (11). Pure bre-1 glycans in working upstream of GDP-keto-6-deoxymannose-3,5-epimewater were then lyophilized, permethylated, and analyzed by rase-4-reductase (FX protein) to convert GDP-mannose into GDP-fucose (22). Human GMD maintains 64% amino acid MALDI-MS as described above. identity to the BRE-1 protein (Fig. 2C). Wormbase shows two RESULTS alternatively spliced variants for bre-1, C53B4.7a and C53B4.7b. A single allele of bre-1, bre-1(ye4), was isolated in genetic We confirmed both of these variants by sequencing reverse screens for C. elegans mutants resistant to Cry5B toxin made by transcription-PCR products from wild-type RNA. C53B4.7b is the invertebrate Gram-positive pathogen B. thuringiensis (9). In 15 amino acids longer than C53B4.7a at its N terminus, and the the same screens, multiple mutant alleles in each of four other first eight amino acids of C53B4.7a differ as well. Otherwise,
Loss of Fucose and Cry5B Resistance in C. elegans
starting at amino acid 9 for C53B4.7a and 24 for C53B4.7b, the protein sequences are the same. The bre-1(ye4) mutation results from a base pair change in exon 4 and affects both splice variants of the gene. The glycine that is converted to glutamic acid in ye4 is conserved in GMDs from other organisms (e.g. E. coli, Arabidopsis, and humans) and is located in helix 7, which is very close to the predicted catalytic domains of the GMD protein (23). There is one other open reading frames in C. elegans with significant homology to BRE-1, F56H6.5. F56H6.5 displays 88% amino acid identity with BRE-1. RNAi of F56H6.5 either by feeding dsRNA to rrf-3(pk1426) animals or injection of dsRNA into the gonad of rrf-3(pk1426) animals does not result in resistance to Cry5B (Fig. 2B). In addition, co-injection of F56H6.5 and C53B4.7 dsRNAs into rrf-3(pk1426) animals qualitatively resulted in the same level of resistance to Cry5B as injection of C53B4.7 dsRNA alone (Fig. 2B). These results suggest that F56H6.5 does not play an important role in facilitating intoxication by Cry5B. It should be noted that most genome-wide RNAi screens have reported no abnormalities for RNAi of C53B4.7 or F56H6.5, although occasional phenotypes such as larval lethality and larval arrest have been noted (24, 25). However, these screens did not focus in detail on any individual gene (as we have done here), and these studies list any phenotype even if it appears in only 10% of the animals. In all our feeding or injection RNAi experiments, we have not noted any significant phenotype for either of two genes other than Cry5B resistance and low brood size for C53B4.7. GDP-fucose Rescue of bre-1-mediated Resistance—If bre-1 is a functional GMD and the toxin resistance defect in the bre1(ye4) mutant is because of a lack of fucose, then the supple-
3306 JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
mentation of fucose into the cells targeted by the toxin should rescue the bre-1(ye4) toxin resistance phenotype. Similar experiments have been successfully performed in mice where it has been shown that supplementation of fucose into the diet of FX-defective mice (FX is the enzyme directly downstream of GMD in the biosynthetic pathway for GDP-fucose) rescues defects resulting from lack of fucose (26). The fucose presumably enters the cells via a fucose-specific transporter that has been reported in several types of mammalian cells (27, 28). Repeated attempts to rescue bre-1(ye4) defects by supplementation of fucose in the medium used to grow C. elegans failed to succeed. We hypothesized that the problem with the rescue experiment might reside in the lack of the salvage pathway that is responsible for converting free fucose from the environment to useable GDP-fucose (29). This process involves a fucokinase and GDP-L-fucose pyrophosphorylase (30). Indeed, a search of the C. elegans genome failed to show any homologues of these proteins in the nematode. Supplementation of the diet with GDP-fucose did not work in attempted experiments presumably because of the absence of a GDP-fucose transporter into C. elegans cells. We therefore modified our rescue approach. We directly injected the intestines of bre-1(ye4) and bre-2(ye31) L4 worms with either L-fucose or GDP-fucose. The intestine is the anatomical focus of action of Cry5B toxin (10, 12). After a 3-h recovery at 15 °C, these worms were transferred to plates with and without toxin. Injection of L-fucose or GDP-fucose did not harm the health of N2, bre-1(ye4), or bre-2(ye31) animals in the absence of toxin (Fig. 3, A–E, left panels). In contrast, bre-1(ye4) animals were intoxicated similar to wild type in the presence of toxin when injected with GDP-fucose but not L-fucose (Fig. 3, VOLUME 282 • NUMBER 5 • FEBRUARY 2, 2007
Downloaded from www.jbc.org at Biomedical Library, UCSD on March 22, 2007
FIGURE 2. BRE-1 is encoded by the C. elegans gene C53B4.7. A, L4-staged bre-1(ye4) worms transformed with C53B4.7 were grown on E. coli transformed with empty vector (left panels) or on 60% E. coli expressing Cry5B (right panels). The animals are rescued back to full susceptibility. B, RNAi of the bre-1(ye4) gene (C53B4.7) and its nearest homologue F56H6.5. rrf-3(pk1426) early adults were injected with dsRNA from the designated genes either individually or together. Late F1 progeny were allowed to grow to the L4 stage before they were plated on E. coli expressing Cry5Bm (see “Experimental Procedures” for details on Cry5Bm) and imaged at 48 h. C, BRE-1 amino acid sequence aligned with the nearest C. elegans homologue (F56H6.5) and the human sequence for the GDP-mannose 4,6-dehydratase gene (H. sapiens). The bre-1(ye4) mutation is the result of a base pair change, which produces a glutamic acid at position 217 instead of a glycine (in red).
Loss of Fucose and Cry5B Resistance in C. elegans
FEBRUARY 2, 2007 • VOLUME 282 • NUMBER 5
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
3307
Downloaded from www.jbc.org at Biomedical Library, UCSD on March 22, 2007
bre-1(ye4) is because of defects in production of glycolipids. Comparison of orcinol-stained upper phase glycolipids isolated from wild-type and bre-1(ye4) mutant animals demonstrate that bre-1(ye4) animals are indeed defective in the production of some highly polar glycolipid species (Fig. 4A). Glycolipid species D is a notable exception in that it is still produced in normal abundance in bre-1(ye4) animals. However, this species does not contain fucose, and so its presence in the bre-1 mutant is expected (11). There are at least two new species of glycolipid that appear in bre-1(ye4) animals (Fig. 4A). To see if these glycolipid defects FIGURE 3. bre-1(ye4) resistance to Cry5B can be rescued with GDP-fucose. A, N2 (wild type) control worms translate into defects in binding plated at a life stage similar to injected bre-1 and bre-2 worms. B–E, bre-1 or bre-2 worms injected with fucose or GDP-fucose before being plated on empty vector E. coli (left panels, no toxin) or E. coli expressing Cry5Bm (right Cry5B toxin, activated Cry5B was panels, toxin). The injected worms did not exhibit a reduction in overall health as a result of injection trauma biotinylated and used in overlay (see no toxin panels). Injection of GDP-fucose into the intestine of bre-1(ye4) animals is the only condition tested binding experiments as described that restores wild-type susceptibility to toxin (compare right panels in C to right panels in A). previously (11). Consistent with the results found with orcinol-stained glycolipids, three dominant Cry5B-binding glycolipid species present in wild type, B, C, and F, are absent in bre-1(ye4) animals (Fig. 4B). Both species B and C are known to contain fucose; the structure of species F is not known (11). Cry5B-binding glycolipid species E is present in the mutant (albeit at reduced levels), but this species normally lacks fucose so its presence in bre-1(ye4) is expected. At least two poorly resolved new glycolipid bands produced by bre-1(ye4) bind Cry5B. These bands might each represent a defucosylated B, C, or F glycolipid species that retains some binding activity. To confirm that glycolipids from bre-1(ye4) animals lack fucose, we probed upper phase glycolipids from wild-type and bre-1(ye4) mutant animals with U. europaeus agglutinin I (UEA-I) that recognizes terminal fucose residues linked to galactose via an ␣-2 linkage (contained in both species B and C). FIGURE 4. bre-1(ye4) animals are defective in the production of glycolip- In wild type animals, glycolipid species C is the predominant ids and Cry5B-binding glycolipids. A, orcinol-stained TLC plate of N2 wildtype and bre-1(ye4) glycolipids that were resolved in tandem with the plate in UEA-I-binding species (Fig. 5, A and B). Several less abundant B. B, resolved glycolipids from N2 wild type and bre-1 after an overlay was and less polar UEA-I binding species are also detected. performed with biotinylated Cry5B. The critical Cry5B binding bands B and C Although glycolipid species B also contains terminal fucose, it are not present in bre-1 mutant animals, but they do possess unique bands of does not bind UEA-I or does so poorly. This result is interesting lower polarity that are capable of binding toxin. because the only difference between bands B and C is one terA–C, right panels). In other words, bre-1(ye4) animals can be minal galactose on band B. UEA-I may be sensitive to a strucrescued back to wild type with injection of GDP-fucose. Rescue tural change caused by the addition of the terminal galactose to of the low brood phenotype at 25 °C is also achieved with injec- band B, which could make fucose less accessible. In glycolipids tion of GDP-fucose (not shown). bre-2(ye31) animals are not from bre-1(ye4) animals, the major (band C) and minor UEArescued back to toxin susceptibility when injected with either 1-binding species are no longer present (Fig. 5B). Although there are still some Cry5B-binding glycolipids in L-fucose or GDP-fucose because they are not defective in fucose biosynthesis (Fig. 3, D and E, right panels). These data are con- bre-1(ye4) mutant animals, qualitatively there appear to be less sistent with bre-1 encoding a functional GMD and with C. total receptors for Cry5B in the mutant relative to wild-type animals (Fig. 4B). To confirm this result quantitatively, total elegans lacking a functional fucose salvage pathway. bre-1(ye4) Animals are Defective in the Production of C. upper phase glycolipids from increasing numbers of wild-type elegans Glycolipid Receptors for Cry5B—Because at least two of (N2), bre-1(ye4), and bre-3(ye28) animals were isolated, immothe glycolipid receptors for Cry5B contain two terminal fucose bilized in polystyrene wells, and probed with biotinylated residues (11), we hypothesized that the resistance phenotype of Cry5B. The results were as predicted based on their resistance
Loss of Fucose and Cry5B Resistance in C. elegans
FIGURE 7. Total monosaccharide analysis of N2 wild-type, bre-1, and bre-3 whole worm pellets. These results represent the average of two trials. Glucose is shown on the right at a different scale.
FIGURE 6. bre-1(ye4) animals show reduced Cry5B binding to C. elegans glycolipids. Total glycolipids from N2 wild-type (diamonds), bre-1 (squares), and bre-3 (triangles) animals were tested for their ability to bind biotinylated Cry5B using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The number on the x axis refers to the number of worm equivalents from which glycolipids were isolated for that particular well.
to Cry5B toxin; bre-1(ye4) animals, which show intermediate levels of toxin resistance, have total glycolipids that show intermediate levels of binding relative to wild type (high levels of toxin binding) and bre-3 animals (very low levels of toxin binding) (Fig. 6). bre-1 Mutant Animals Show Severe Reductions in Fucose and in Fucosylated N- and O-Glycans—To determine the effects of the bre-1(ye4) mutation on the production of fucose, we performed monosaccharide analyses of wild-type, bre-3(ye28), and bre-1(ye4) mutant animals (Fig. 7). Although bre-1 mutant animals display relatively normal levels of galactose, GalNAc, and GlcNAc, they contain no detectable fucose. Thus BRE-1 plays a major role in the production of GDP-fucose in C. elegans, consistent with it encoding a functional GMD. bre-1 mutant animals also show an increase in the amount of total mannose, which may indicate an inability to convert mannose to fucose.
3308 JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
We have demonstrated previously that C. elegans proteinlinked N- and O-glycans are rich in fucosylated structures (11, 31, 32). To understand the effects of bre-1(ye4) on protein fucosylation, total protein from wild type and bre-1 mutant animals were extracted, prepared for N- and O-glycan analysis, and subject to MALDI mass spectroscopy (Fig. 8 and Table 4). From the PNGase F spectra the small fucosylated truncated N-glycans (m/z 1141–1897, Fuc0 –3Hex2– 4HexNAc2) and the larger fucosylated glycans (m/z 1753–2305, Fuc0 –3Hex5– 6HexNAc2) were absent from bre-1 mutant spectra. Even more strikingly, the spectra for the bre-1 mutant PNGase A-released N-glycans also did not contain any of the fucosylated glycans seen in the wild type spectra (m/z 1141–2479, Fuc1– 4Hex2– 6HexNAc2). In addition gas chromatography-MS linkage analysis of the bre-1 mutant PNGase F- and PNGase A-released glycans failed to detect a signal for terminal fucose, which is a major signal in the wild-type samples (data not shown). The spectra of the permethylated reductively eliminated O-glycans from bre-1 mutants also lacked the fucosylated glycans detected in the wild type (m/z 1494 –1944, Fuc2Hex4 –5HexNAc2–3). Taken together these data indicated that bre-1 mutant worms do not fucosylate any of their glycoproteins. bre-1 Mutant Animals Show Severe Reductions in Fucosylated Upper Phase Glycolipid-derived Glycans—The glycan components of the upper phase glycolipids were enzymatically released and analyzed by MALDI mass spectrometry (Fig. 9 and Table 5). The spectra are dominated by three signals at m/z 1375, 1579, and 1783 consistent with compositions of Hex4 – 6HexNAc2. A very minor potential molecular ion is present at m/z 2337 consistent with the difucosylated glycolipid B, but this signal constitutes less than 0.25% of the total glycan mixture. The major molecular ions are consistent with defucosylated, truncated versions of the previously characterized wild-type upper phase, glycolipid-derived glycans (11).
DISCUSSION The bre-1 gene, which mutates to resist Cry5B crystal toxin, encodes a putative GMD, the first enzyme in the biosynthesis of cellular GDP-fucose. The evidence that BRE-1 is the major functional GMD in C. elegans is as follows: 1) BRE-1 shows extensive (64% amino acid identity) identity with human GMD; 2) loss of BRE-1 results in a loss of detectable fucose on proteins as determined by monosaccharide analysis and by mass specVOLUME 282 • NUMBER 5 • FEBRUARY 2, 2007
Downloaded from www.jbc.org at Biomedical Library, UCSD on March 22, 2007
FIGURE 5. bre-1(ye4) animals are deficient in fucosylated glycolipids. A, orcinol-stained plate of N2 wild-type and bre-1(ye4) glycolipids that were resolved in tandem with the plate in B. B, fucose-binding lectin overlay of N2 and bre-1 glycolipids. This shows that bre-1 glycolipids do not bind the fucose-specific lectin, whereas band C and other glycolipids from N2 do bind the lectin.
Loss of Fucose and Cry5B Resistance in C. elegans
TABLE 4 Assignments of molecular ions observed in MALDI spectra of permethylated N- and O-glycans of N2 and bre-1 worms N-Glycans Signal
Assignment
m/z
1141 1171 1345 1375 1416 1519 1549 1579 1661 1723 1753 1783 1835 1897 1927 1957 1987 2080 2101 2131 2191 2305 2395 2479
O-Glycans Signal
Assignment
m/z
FucHex2HexNAc2 ⫹ Na⫹ Hex3HexNAc2 ⫹ Na⫹ FucHex3HexNAc2 ⫹ Na⫹ Hex4HexNAc2 ⫹ Na⫹ Hex3HexNAc3 ⫹ Na⫹ Fuc2Hex3HexNAc2 ⫹ Na⫹ FucHex4HexNAc2 ⫹ Na⫹ Hex5HexNAc2 ⫹ Na⫹ Hex3HexNAc4 ⫹ Na⫹ Fuc2Hex4HexNAc2 ⫹ Na⫹ FucHex5HexNAc2 ⫹ Na⫹ Hex6HexNAc2 ⫹ Na⫹ FucHex3HexNAc4 ⫹ Na⫹ Fuc3Hex4HexNAc2 ⫹ Na⫹ Fuc2Hex5HexNAc2 ⫹ Na⫹ FucHex6HexNAc2 ⫹ Na⫹ Hex7HexNAc2 ⫹ Na⫹ FucHex3HexNAc5 ⫹ Na⫹ Fuc3Hex5HexNAc2 ⫹ Na⫹ Fuc2Hex6HexNAc2 ⫹ Na⫹ Hex8HexNAc2 ⫹ Na⫹ Fuc3Hex6HexNAc2 ⫹ Na⫹ Hex9HexNAc2 ⫹ Na⫹ Fuc4Hex6HexNAc2 ⫹ Na⫹
534 738 942 956 1146 1160 1364 1494 1565 1698 1739 1913 1944
HexHexNAcR⫹ Na⫹ Hex2HexNAcR ⫹ Na⫹ Hex3HexNAcR ⫹ Na⫹ HexAHex2HexNAcR ⫹ Na⫹ Hex4HexNAcR ⫹ Na⫹ HexAHex3HexNAcR ⫹ Na⫹ HexAHex4HexNAcR ⫹ Na⫹ Fuc2Hex4HexNAcR ⫹ Na⫹ FucHex4HexNAc2R ⫹ Na⫹ Fuc2Hex5HexNAcR ⫹ Na⫹ Fuc2Hex4HexNAc2R ⫹ Na⫹ Fuc3Hex4HexNAc2R ⫹ Na⫹ Fuc2Hex5HexNAc2R ⫹ Na⫹
troscopy analyses; 3) loss of BRE-1 results in loss of detectable fucose on glycolipids as suggested by fucose-binding lectin and by mass spectroscopy analysis; 4) bre-1 mutant phenotypes can be rescued by the injection of GDP-fucose but not fucose; and 5) the bre-1(ye4) allele alters a residue conserved in all GMDs characterized to date. The bre-1 mutant was identified based on its resistance to Cry5B B. thuringiensis toxin. bre-1 mutant animals are defecFEBRUARY 2, 2007 • VOLUME 282 • NUMBER 5
FIGURE 9. MALDI mass spectrum of permethylated bre-1 upper phase glycolipid-derived glycans. The glycan component of upper phase bre-1 glycolipids were enzymatically released, permethylated, and analyzed by MALDI mass spectrometry.
tive in the production of C. elegans polar glycolipids; some polar glycolipids appear to be fully absent (e.g. species B and C), whereas some polar glycolipid species appear to be reduced in level (e.g. species E). Because polar glycolipids serve as receptors for Cry5B (11), the reduction in number and/or affinity of glycolipid species that bind Cry5B toxin in the bre-1 mutant explain the basis of resistance. They also explain the lower level of resistance seen in bre-1 animals relative to the other bre mutants; the binding of Cry5B to glycolipids found in the bre-1 mutant is quantitatively less than that found in wild-type animals but greater than what is seen in the bre-3 mutant, which disrupts the production of all polar arthroseries glycolipids in C. elegans (11). Thus, Cry5B toxicity correlates with the amount of JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
3309
Downloaded from www.jbc.org at Biomedical Library, UCSD on March 22, 2007
FIGURE 8. MALDI mass spectra of permethylated N- and O-glycans from N2 and bre-1 worms. The N-glycans of N2 and bre-1 worm glycoproteins were released from tryptic glycopeptides by sequential digestion with PNGase F and PNGase A, and O-glycans were subsequently released by reductive elimination. Released glycans were permethylated and screened by MALDI-MS. A–C, N2 PNGase F, PNGase A, and O-glycans; D–F, bre-1 PNGase F, PNGase A, and O-glycans.
Loss of Fucose and Cry5B Resistance in C. elegans TABLE 5 Assignments of molecular ions observed in MALDI spectra of permethylated bre-1 upper phase glycolipid-derived glycans Signal
Assignment
m/z
1171 1375 1579 1742 1783 1946 1987 2150 2191 2335
Hex3HexNAc2 ⫹ Na⫹ Hex4HexNAc2 ⫹ Na⫹ Hex5HexNAc2 ⫹ Na⫹ Hex7HexNAc1 ⫹ Na⫹ Hex6HexNAc2 ⫹ Na⫹ Hex8HexNAc1 ⫹ Na⫹ Hex7HexNAc2 ⫹ Na⫹ Hex9HexNAc1 ⫹ Na⫹ Hex8HexNAc2 ⫹ Na⫹ Fuc2Hex7HexNAc2 ⫹ Na⫹
3310 JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Acknowledgments—We thank Delia Matriano and the Glycotechnology Core Facility for aid in obtaining monosaccharide analysis results. We also thank members of the Aroian laboratory for discussions and the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center for providing worm strains. Addendum—The protein encoded by the bre-1 gene has been shown recently to have the predicted enzymatic activity for GMD (41). VOLUME 282 • NUMBER 5 • FEBRUARY 2, 2007
Downloaded from www.jbc.org at Biomedical Library, UCSD on March 22, 2007
binding to glycolipids. This binding is heavily dependent on the presence of terminal galactose residues (11), which may explain why the absence of fucose is not sufficient for achieving full resistance to Cry5B. In contrast to galactose, fucose is not capable of competing with receptor in Cry5B binding experiments. Because of the fact that galactose is still present in bre-1, it is possible that the remaining toxin-binding bands found in bre-1 glycolipids may be altered forms of the primary binding bands B and C found in N2, as suggested in Fig. 9. Although we cannot be sure that the ye4 allele represents a complete loss of function, it seems to represent at least a strong reduction of function allele because of the following: 1) ye4 mutation is in an amino acid residue that is conserved in GMDs, 2) RNAi leads to a similarly penetrant phenotype, and 3) bre-1(ye4) in trans to a deletion allele qualitatively leads to the same level of resistance as the homozygous mutant (not shown). This report is the first to study the fucose biosynthetic pathway and GMD in C. elegans. Because of the importance of fucosylation, GMD itself is an important enzyme studied in a wide variety of organisms. Biochemical deficiency of GMD activity in humans is associated with leukocyte adhesion deficiency II, a rare genetic disease characterized by immunodeficiency and severe mental and growth retardation (33). GMD in Arabidopsis thaliana is encoded by two genes, GMD1 and GMD2 (MUR1), and loss of GMD2 leads to reduced tensile strength of elongating stem segments and slight dwarfism (34). GMD, along with the fucose salvage pathway, also plays an important role in the ability of the bacterial symbiont Bacteroides to colonize the mammalian intestine (35), and a mutation in Pseudomonas fluorescens GMD was shown to be deficient in biofilm formation and attenuated for virulence in a Drosophila model system (36). Our data also demonstrate that C. elegans lacks a functional fucose salvage pathway to convert L-fucose to GDPfucose because injection of L-fucose is not able to rescue bre-1 mutant phenotypes (in contrast to injection of GDP-fucose). It was suggested that Drosophila melanogaster also lacks a functional fucose salvage pathway because no detectable homologues of the enzymes involved in this pathway could be discerned from its genome (37). These data show a unique variant on the mechanism of resistance to crystal toxin via biosynthesis of a monosaccharide. All previous data in insects and nematodes point to either mutation in proteases required to process crystal toxin or mutation in genes that directly encode the receptor (3). Here, resistance is caused by mutation of a gene that indirectly influ-
ences the production of receptor. It is conceivable that many other similar mutations will be found in the future. In addition to the resistance defect, bre-1 mutant animals show a significant reduction in brood size at 25 °C. Based on the glycan analysis of bre-1 mutant animals, it is plausible that the reduction in brood observed is because of the absence of fucosylated glycans critical to the development of the germ line and/or proper egg fertilization. Fucosylated glycans have been shown to be critical in mammalian fertility (38). Interestingly, bre-3 mutant animals also display a reduced brood size at 25 °C suggesting that bre-3 is involved in making glycolipid species that is made important for fertility but that does not involve bre-2, -4, or -5 (e.g. Man1– 4Glc-ceramide). There is evidence for two interesting feedback mechanisms in the bre-1 mutant. First, the level of at least one nonfucosylated glycolipid (e.g. species E) is reduced in bre-1 mutant animals. Thus, the lack of fucosylation somehow feeds back onto the overall production of glycolipids. Furthermore, the severe reduction in fucose appears to result in a moderate increase in the amount of total cellular mannose. Because GDP-mannose is the precursor for GDP-fucose, this result is expected because it might be predicted that there would be an accumulation of mannose. Fucose is also recognized by a functioning mammalian immune system as part of an epitope for IgE antibodies attacking the parasitic helminthes Hemonchus contortus in infected sheep (39). The core ␣1–3-fucosylated N-glycan functioning as an epitope in this study has also been found in C. elegans (39). Based on this information alone, a fucose-deficient C. elegans mutant such as bre-1 could be an important tool in the study of the IgE immune response to parasitic nematodes. The reduction in total fucose levels and fucosylated N- and O-glycans in the bre-1 mutant is striking and dramatic. Fucose levels are reduced to undetectable levels in the mutant, and fucosylated N- and O-glycans are missing by mass spectroscopy analyses. There is no precedent for such a severe level of fucose depletion leading to such a mild phenotype in an animal. The FX mouse, which is defective for the second enzyme in the fucose biosynthetic pathway, has been found to be incapable of survival without being provided an outside source of fucose (26). As noted above, defects in GMD in humans can lead to leukocyte adhesion deficiency type II, which is a human disorder characterized by growth and mental retardation in addition to immune problems stemming from a defect in leukocyte rolling during inflammation. The lack of a fucose salvage pathway is consistent with these data; the nematode has apparently evolved to survive with very little fucose and fucosylated proteins.
Loss of Fucose and Cry5B Resistance in C. elegans REFERENCES
FEBRUARY 2, 2007 • VOLUME 282 • NUMBER 5
Aroian, R. V. (2004) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101, 10995–11000 22. Sullivan, F. X., Kumar, R., Kriz, R., Stahl, M., Xu, G. Y., Rouse, J., Chang, X. J., Boodhoo, A., Potvin, B., and Cumming, D. A. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 8193– 8202 23. Somoza, J. R., Menon, S., Schmidt, H., Joseph-McCarthy, D., Dessen, A., Stahl, M. L., Somers, W. S., and Sullivan, F. X. (2000) Structure (Fold Des.) 8, 123–135 24. Fraser, A. G., Kamath, R. S., Zipperlen, P., Martinez-Campos, M., Sohrmann, M., and Ahringer, J. (2000) Nature 408, 325–330 25. Kamath, R. S., Fraser, A. G., Dong, Y., Poulin, G., Durbin, R., Gotta, M., Kanapin, A., Le Bot, N., Moreno, S., Sohrmann, M., Welchman, D. P., Zipperlen, P., and Ahringer, J. (2003) Nature 421, 231–237 26. Smith, P. L., Myers, J. T., Rogers, C. E., Zhou, L., Petryniak, B., Becker, D. J., Homeister, J. W., and Lowe, J. B. (2002) J. Cell Biol. 158, 801– 815 27. Wiese, T. J., Dunlap, J. A., and Yorek, M. A. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 22705–22711 28. Jonas, A. J., Conrad, P., and Jobe, H. (1990) Biochem. J. 272, 323–326 29. Freeze, H. H. (2002) J. Cell Biol. 158, 615– 616 30. Pastuszak, I., Ketchum, C., Hermanson, G., Sjoberg, E. J., Drake, R., and Elbein, A. D. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 30165–30174 31. Haslam, S. M., and Dell, A. (2003) Biochimie (Paris) 85, 25–32 32. Haslam, S. M., Gems, D., Morris, H. R., and Dell, A. (2002) Biochem. Soc. Symp. 69, 117–134 33. Sturla, L., Etzioni, A., Bisso, A., Zanardi, D., De Flora, G., Silengo, L., De Flora, A., and Tonetti, M. (1998) FEBS Lett. 429, 274 –278 34. Bonin, C. P., Potter, I., Vanzin, G. F., and Reiter, W. D. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94, 2085–2090 35. Coyne, M. J., Reinap, B., Lee, M. M., and Comstock, L. E. (2005) Science 307, 1778 –1781 36. de Lima Pimenta, A., Di Martino, P., Le Bouder, E., Hulen, C., and Blight, M. A. (2003) Microbes Infect. 5, 1177–1187 37. Roos, C., Kolmer, M., Mattila, P., and Renkonen, R. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 3168 –3175 38. Dell, A., Morris, H. R., Easton, R. L., Patankar, M., and Clark, G. F. (1999) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1473, 196 –205 39. van Die, I., Gomord, V., Kooyman, F. N., van den Berg, T. K., Cummings, R. D., and Vervelde, L. (1999) FEBS Lett. 463, 189 –193 40. Dionex Corp. (1993) Analysis of Carbohydrates by High Performance Anion Exchange Chromatography with Pulsed Amperometric Detection (HPAE-PAD), Technical Note 20, 1–12 41. Rhomberg, S., Fuchsluger, C., Rendic, D., Paschinger, K., Jantsch, V., Kosma, P., and Wilson, I. B. H. (2006) FEBS J. 273, 2244 –2256
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
3311
Downloaded from www.jbc.org at Biomedical Library, UCSD on March 22, 2007
1. Thomson, J. A. (2002) J. Nutr. 132, S3441–S3442 2. Betz, F. S., Hammond, B. G., and Fuchs, R. L. (2000) Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 32, 156 –173 3. Griffitts, J. S., and Aroian, R. V. (2005) BioEssays 27, 614 – 624 4. Whalon, M. E., and Wingerd, B. A. (2003) Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 54, 200 –211 5. Palmer, R. W., Edwardes, M., and Nevill, E. M. (1996) Onderstepoort J. Vet. Res. 63, 289 –304 6. James, C. (2005) Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops, International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications, Ithaca, NY 7. Wei, J. Z., Hale, K., Carta, L., Platzer, E., Wong, C., Fang, S. C., and Aroian, R. V. (2003) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100, 2760 –2765 8. Kotze, A. C., O’Grady, J., Gough, J. M., Pearson, R., Bagnall, N. H., Kemp, D. H., and Akhurst, R. J. (2005) Int. J. Parasitol. 35, 1013–1022 9. Marroquin, L. D., Elyassnia, D., Griffitts, J. S., Feitelson, J. S., and Aroian, R. V. (2000) Genetics 155, 1693–1699 10. Griffitts, J. S., Whitacre, J. L., Stevens, D. E., and Aroian, R. V. (2001) Science 293, 860 – 864 11. Griffitts, J. S., Haslam, S. M., Yang, T., Garczynski, S. F., Mulloy, B., Morris, H., Cremer, P. S., Dell, A., Adang, M. J., and Aroian, R. V. (2005) Science 307, 922–925 12. Griffitts, J. S., Huffman, D. L., Whitacre, J. L., Barrows, B. D., Marroquin, L. D., Muller, R., Brown, J. R., Hennet, T., Esko, J. D., and Aroian, R. V. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 45594 – 45602 13. Brenner, S. (1974) Genetics 77, 71–94 14. Wicks, S. R., Yeh, R. T., Gish, W. R., Waterston, R. H., and Plasterk, R. H. (2001) Nat. Genet. 28, 160 –164 15. Cappello, M., Bungiro, R. D., Harrison, L. M., Bischof, L. J., Griffitts, J. S., Barrows, B. D., and Aroian, R. V. (2006) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 103, 15154 –15159 16. Bischof, L. J., Huffman, D. L., and Aroian, R. V. (2006) Methods Mol. Biol. 351, 139 –154 17. Finney, D. J. (1971) Probit Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 333 18. Schnaar, R. L. (1994) Methods Enzymol. 230, 348 –370 19. Dell, A., Reason, A. J., Khoo, K. H., Panico, M., McDowell, R. A., and Morris, H. R. (1994) Methods Enzymol. 230, 108 –132 20. Morelle, W., Haslam, S. M., Olivier, V., Appleton, J. A., Morris, H. R., and Dell, A. (2000) Glycobiology 10, 941–950 21. Huffman, D. L., Abrami, L., Sasik, R., Corbeil, J., van der Goot, F. G., and