Ruthenium(II) - Semantic Scholar

ARTICLE Received 15 Feb 2017 | Accepted 30 Mar 2017 | Published 9 Jun 2017

DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15430

OPEN

Ruthenium(II)-catalysed remote C–H alkylations as a versatile platform to meta-decorated arenes Jie Li1,*, Korkit Korvorapun1,*, Suman De Sarkar1,*, Torben Rogge1, David J. Burns1, Svenja Warratz1 & Lutz Ackermann1

The full control of positional selectivity is of prime importance in C–H activation technology. Chelation assistance served as the stimulus for the development of a plethora of ortho-selective arene functionalizations. In sharp contrast, meta-selective C–H functionalizations continue to be scarce, with all ruthenium-catalysed transformations currently requiring difficult to remove or modify nitrogen-containing heterocycles. Herein, we describe a unifying concept to access a wealth of meta-decorated arenes by a unique arene ligand effect in proximity-induced ruthenium(II) C–H activation catalysis. The transformative nature of our strategy is mirrored by providing a step-economical entry to a range of meta-substituted arenes, including ketones, acids, amines and phenols—key structural motifs in crop protection, material sciences, medicinal chemistry and pharmaceutical industries.

1 Institut fu ¨ r Organische und Biomolekulare Chemie, Georg-August-Universita¨t Go¨ttingen, Tammannstrae 2, 37077 Go¨ttingen, Germany. * These authors contributed equally to this work. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to L.A. (email: [email protected]).

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 8:15430 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15430 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications

1

ARTICLE

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15430

T

he functionalization of otherwise inert C–H bonds by means of transition metal catalysis has emerged as an increasingly powerful platform in organic synthesis, with transformative applications to medicinal chemistry, material sciences and drug design1–10. Since the substrates of interest display a variety of C–H bonds with close dissociation energies, achieving positional selectivity in intermolecular C–H transformations is paramount11–15. Thus, chelation assistance has proven particularly instrumental for proximity-induced ortho-C–H functionalizations16–19. In stark contrast, remote arene functionalizations continue to be challenging, with major recent progress being achieved by inter alia complementary palladium20–29, iridium30,31, rhodium32 and ruthenium33–39

catalysis through steric control, template assistance, weak hydrogen bonding, transient mediators or catalytic s-activation by ortho-C–H metalation (Fig. 1a)40. Despite undisputable advances, these methods typically offer access to only a single compound class. Furthermore, all protocols for ruthenium-catalysed meta-C–H functionalization33–39 continue to be restricted to nitrogen-containing heterocycles, such as 2-arylpyridines, as the directing group. Since such heteroarenes are difficult to modify or remove39,41, the synthetic utility of this strategy is significantly compromised. Within our program on sustainable C–H activation, we have now addressed these major limitations in C–H activation technology by developing remote imine C–H functionalizations by a unique arene ligand effect,

a

Previous reports (1) Steric control

(2) Template-assisted

(3) Hydrogen bonding

(5) Pyridine DG

(4) Transient mediator

O R

Linker

Template

R

N H O X

N H Pd

H

N C

Ir H

Ir

N H

N

DG

R'

R2

Ru

H Pd

N

H

Difficult to remove or modify

b

Unifying concept to meta-decorated arenes TMP NH

R

- Reusable transient imines - Transformative diversification - Valuable meta-decorated arenes

Ar Alk

NH2 Ar Alk

Me Me TMP N

R

+

AdCO2

Me

Ru O O

Ad

TMP N

R

R

Alk Br

O

Ar

Ar

Ar

Ar H

Alk

Alk

- Full kinetic analysis - Enabling arene ligand effect - Single ruthenium(II) catalyst for sequential ortho- and remote meta-C–H functionalization

OH Ar O

Alk

OH

Ar Alk

O

Me CO2H

Me Me

H N

H N

Cy

OH N

Me Epoxide hydrolase inhibitor

O Me

O Me

Anti-inflammatory, analgesic and antipyretic drug

H

Me Me

Me

Me Me OH Me

Antioxidant cell proliferation inhibitor anti-inflammatory

O

N H Br

O

GPR30 receptor agonist

Figure 1 | Transformative ruthenium(II)-catalysed meta-C–H functionalization regime. (a) Previous reports: selectivity control by (1) steric interactions, (2) template auxiliaries, (3) hydrogen bonding, (4) transient mediator and (5) difficult to remove or modify pyridines. (b) Unifying concept to a wealth of meta-decorated arenes. 2


ARTICLE


Table 1 | Reaction development for meta-selective C–H functionalization. TMP N

Me

Me +

[RuCl2(p-cymene)]2 (5.0 mol %) ligand (30 mol %)

Br

K2CO3, solvent 120 °C, 20 h

F 1a

Entry 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

2a

Ligand MesCO2H 1-AdCO2H (4) 1-AdCO2H (4) 1-AdCO2H(4) 1-AdCO2H (4) Piv-Val-OH Boc-Val-OH Boc-Ile-OH Piv-Ile-OH (5) Piv-Ile-OH (5) Piv-Ile-OH (5)

Solvent 1,4-dioxane 1,4-dioxane PhH PhMe PhCMe3 PhMe PhMe PhMe PhMe PhCF3 PhCMe3

O

Me H3O+

Me F 3aa

Yield (%) 30 52 54 58 73, 76* 17 26 28 33 41 64

*[RuCl2(p-cymene)]2 (2.5 mol %), 1-AdCO2H (15 mol %). TMP = 3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl. Reaction conditions: 1a (0.5 mmol), 2a (1.5 mmol), [RuCl2(p-cymene)]2 (5.0 mol %), ligand (30 mol %), K2CO3 (1.0 mmol), solvent (2.0 ml), 120 °C, 20 h, yield of isolated products. Bold entries indicate optimal ligands (4 and 5), solvent (PhCMe3) and corresponding yields.

unleashing the full potential of C–H activation technology. Our approach is characterized by an expedient substrate scope, providing a broad access to various meta-decorated arenes, including synthetically meaningful ketones, alcohols, amines and acids, that constitute integral structural motifs in material sciences, crop protection and drug design (Fig. 1b)42,43. Notable features of our findings are not limited to (1) a remarkable arene ligand effect in ruthenium C–H activation chemistry, (2) a distinct catalyst design and (3) a tandem multicatalysis44 approach involving both remote meta- and ortho-C–H functionalization with the aid of a single ruthenium(II) catalyst manifold. Results Development of meta-C–H alkylation. We commenced our studies by probing the effect exerted by carboxylates and solvents on the challenging meta-C–H alkylation of synthetically useful ketimines 1 (Table 1 and Supplementary Table 1). Sterically congested 1-AdCO2H (4)45 was found to be an efficient ligand for the desired remote C–H functionalization process (entries 1 and 2). Notably, among a variety of solvents, tert-butylbenzene set the stage for a particularly effective meta-C–H functionalization catalysis that strongly contrasts to the previously employed 1,4-dioxane and toluene solvents (entries 1–5). Given the power of mono-protected amino acids (MPAAs) in C–H activation35,46,47, we also explored different MPAAs in the meta-C–H functionalization process (entries 6–9), with Piv-Ile-OH (5) emerging as the best in class (entries 9–11). Substrate scope. The versatility of the optimized ruthenium(II)catalysed meta-C–H alkylation was explored with substituted ketimines 1 and tertiary bromides 2, initially employing the ruthenium(II) catalyst derived from the MPAA Piv-Ile-OH (5). The catalytic system was found to be versatile, yet the ruthenium(II) biscarboxylate catalyst generally proved more powerful (Fig. 2). We were pleased to observe that both tertiary and secondary alkyl bromides 2 were compatible electrophiles

in the carboxylate-assisted ruthenium(II)-catalysed meta-C–H functionalization. A range of electronically differentiated ketimines 1 performed well under the optimized reaction conditions with both cyclic and acyclic tertiary alkyl bromides 2. It is noteworthy that the alkyl bromide 2e containing a highly reactive alkyl chloride motif furnished the desired product 3ae with excellent levels of chemoselectivity. The remarkable versatility of the optimized ruthenium catalyst was reflected by fully tolerating synthetically valuable functional groups, such as chlorides, heteroarenes, ester, ketones, thioethers or amines, within intramolecular as well as intermolecular competition experiments, including a robustness screen48 protocol (see the Supplementary Table 3). Propiophenone-derived ketimine 1e-f underwent the meta-cycloheptylation to selectively deliver the desired products 3, while an aldimine substrate gave thus far only less satisfactory yields of 20%. Likewise, the naphthalene derivative 1l furnished meta-substituted arene 3lf–3lm as the sole products by positional selective C–H functionalization, while the structurally complex steroid 3of could be prepared by remote C–H activation. It is noteworthy that the corresponding 3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl (TMP)-amine could be recovered after its traceless removal in high yields (see 3eb). Moreover, synthetically useful Lewis-basic heterocycles, such as morpholine, pyran and piperidine, were fully accepted by the robust ruthenium(II) catalysis regime. Mechanistic considerations. Given the unique efficacy of the ketimine-assisted meta-C–H functionalization by ruthenium(II) catalysis, along with the unconventional solvent effect, we became attracted to delineating its mode of action. To this end, intra- and intermolecular competition experiments revealed the meta-C–H alkylation to exclusively occur on the more electron-deficient aromatic moieties (Fig. 3, and the Supplementary Figs 1 and 2), with the geometric isomers of substrate 1r undergoing facile interconversion even at ambient temperature (Supplementary Fig. 3). It is noteworthy that these observations strongly contrast with the trend previously observed in meta-sulfonylations38 and alkylations37 of 2-phenylpyridines, in which electron-rich arenes usually reacted preferentially. In contrast to previous proposals38,49, our findings thus render an electrophilic substitution manifold unlikely to be operative here. Furthermore, the use of typical radical scavengers (Fig. 4a), enantiomerically enriched substrate 2m (Fig. 4b) and the diastereomerically pure alkyl halides 2p provided strong support for a radical-based mechanism (Fig. 4c). Detailed kinetic experiments with mono-metallic catalyst [Ru(O2CAd)2(p-cymene)] (6) highlighted a first-order dependence with respect to both the single-component catalyst 6 and the ketimine 1a (Fig. 5), with saturation kinetics being observed for the alkyl bromide 2a (see the Supplementary Fig. 4). An Arrhenius plot analysis highlighted an activation barrier of 99 kJ mol 1. To rationalize the unique effect exerted by the aromatic solvent tert-butylbenzene, we independently prepared the novel single-component complex 7. It is noteworthy that the well-defined catalyst 7 featured a significantly reduced induction period, along with an overall improved robustness and catalytic efficacy, indicating a unique arene ligand effect in rutheniumcatalysed C–H activation catalysis. Late-stage diversification. The outstanding synthetic utility of the remote50 imine C–H functionalization approach for late-stage diversification of the thus obtained meta-alkylated arenes was reflected by operationally simple transformations in a user-friendly one-pot fashion (Fig. 6). Facile reduction of the ketimines 8, hence, provided valuable benzyl amine derivatives 9.


3

ARTICLE


TMP N

R1

+

Alk Br

[RuCl2(p-cymene)]2 (5.0 mol %) 1-AdCO2H (4, 30 mol %) H3O+ K2CO3, PhCMe3 120 °C, 20 h

Ar 1

Me

R1

Ar Alk

2

3

Me

O

O

O

Et

O

Me

O R5

Me

Me

t-Bu R2

R2 2

R =H R2 = F

(3bb): 71%, (3ab): 74%, 65%[a] 52% (t-Bu-I) 72% (t-Bu-Cl) R2 = OMe (3cb): 81%, 66%[a] R2 = Cl (3db): 62%, 65%[a] Et

F

2

54%[a]

51%[a]

R = H (3ba): 60%, R2 = F (3aa): 73%, 64%[a]

F Me Me

3ea: 70%,

Me n-Bu

O

5

(3ac): 76%, 66%[a] R =H (3ad): 59%, 51%[a] R5 = Ph R5 = CH2Cl (3ae): 55%, 22%[a]

56%[a]

O

Et

O

O

R2 t-Bu

t-Bu R2 R2 = H (3fb): 80%, 59%[a] R2 = F (3eb): 83%, 59%[a,b]

3gb: 74%, 57%[a] [a] With

Piv-Ile-OH (5) as the ligand. reisolated in 86% yield.

[b] TMPNH2

Me

Et

O

2

R =H R2 = Me R2 = OMe R2 = CF3 R2 = Ph R2 = CO2Me

O

Me

(3bf): (3hf): (3cf): (3if): (3jf): (3kf):

3ff: 59%

69% 71% 81% 59% 63% 71%

O

Me

O

Me F n = 1 (3ag): n = 2 (3ah): n = 3 (3af): Gram-scale n = 4 (3ai): Me

F

n 71% 69% 81% 86% 67%

R4

3ef: 78%

3lf: 89%

R4 = R4 = R4 = R4 =

O

Me

(3lj): Me (3lk): Et n-Pr (3ll): n-Hex (3lm):

84% 78% 77% 79%

O O

O

O

O

Me

O

Me

Me Cl R

Me

Me

H

R = H (3mf): 52% R = NMe2 (3nf): 64%

Me

O

Me

H

H

3df: 54%

Me

H

O

3of: 57%

Me

O

Me

O

Me F

F

N

N

N

Boc

O

Boc

X X = O (3pf): 58% X = CH2 (3qf): 70%

3an: 57%

3lo: 54%

3ao: 52%

Figure 2 | Substrate scope. Versatility of the ruthenium(II)-catalysed meta-alkylation.

Alk

H H

TMP N

H F

2f (1.5 equiv) [RuCl2(p-cymene)]2 (5.0 mol %) + 1-AdCO2H (4, 30 mol %) H3O

H O

K2CO3, PhCMe3 120 °C, 20 h

F

1r 3rf: 46% (di: 31%)

Figure 3 | Intramolecular competition experiment. Alkylation occurs on the more electron-deficient aromatic group. 4


ARTICLE


a

TMP N

Me

2f (3.0 equiv) [RuCl2(p-cymene)]2 (5.0 mol %) + 1-AdCO2H (4, 30 mol %) H3O

Me

O

K2CO3, PhCMe3 120 °C, 20 h

F

F 3af

1a

BHT (1.0 equiv): 78% TEMPO (1.0 equiv): ---

b

TMP N

Me

TEMPO 16%

[RuCl2(p-cymene)]2 (5.0 mol %) + 1-AdCO2H (4, 30 mol %) H3O

Br + Me

1l

Me

O

Me

K2CO3, PhCMe3 120 °C, 20 h

n-Hex

n-Hex

2m (84% ee)

rac-3lm: 78%

c TMP N

Me

t-Bu

+

[RuCl2(p-cymene)]2 (5.0 mol %) + 1-AdCO2H (4, 30 mol %) H3O

3ap 75%, cis:trans 43:57

TMP N

Me

F

cis-2p

1a

+ Br

t-Bu

[RuCl2(p-cymene)]2 Me (5.0 mol %) + 1-AdCO2H (4, 30 mol %) H3O

O

t-Bu

K2CO3, PhCMe3 120 °C, 20 h

F

F

trans-2p

1a

O

t-Bu

K2CO3, PhCMe3 120 °C, 20 h

Br

F

Me

3ap 51%, cis:trans 43:57

Figure 4 | Mechanistic studies. Probing a radical-based mechanism by (a) the addition of radical scavengers (b) the use of enantiomerically enriched alkyl halide 2m and (c) the use of diasteromerically pure 2p.

Kinetic analysis Me TMP Me

cat.

N Br +

Me

2a

8aa

(1) Order in [Ru(O2 CAd)2 (p-cymene)] (6) –1

–7.2 –7.3

s )

–7.1

–7.3

–1

(2) Order in ketimine 1a

–7.2

–7.4 –7.5 –7.6 –7.7 y = 1.17x – 5.49 R 2 = 0.99

–7.8 –7.9 –8.0

log (Δ [8aa] Δt –1 / mol l

–1

s )

Me F

F 1a

–1

TMP N

Me

Ad

K2 CO3 PhCMe3 , 92 °C

H


i-Pr

Ru O AdCO2 6 O

–7.4 –7.5 y = 0.93x – 6.90 2 R = 0.98

–7.6 –7.7 –7.8

–8.1 –2.3 –2.2 –2.1 –2.0 –1.9 –1.8 –1.7 –1.6 log ([Ru(O2CAd)2(p-cymene)]/ mol l

–1.0 –0.9 –0.8 –0.7 –0.6 –0.5 –0.4 –0.3

–1

(3) Arrhenius plot analysis

–1

log ([1a]/ mol l )

Me Me

(4) Me

i -Pr

vs Ru O Ru O AdCO2 Ad 6 O 7 O Performed in 1,4-dioxane

AdCO2

Me Ad

70

–16.0

60

[Ru(O2CAd)2(t -BuC6H5)] [Ru(O2CAd)2(p-cymene)]

50

–16.5

8aa / %


–1

–1

s )

80 –15.5

–17.0

40 30

–17.5

y = –11,888x + 15.34

–18.0

2 R = 0.95 –1 EA = 99.2±12.5 kJ mol

20 10 0

–18.5 0.00260 0.00265 0.00270 0.00275 0.00280 T

–1

/K

–1

0

200

400

600

800

t / min

Figure 5 | Kinetic analysis. Order in (1) catalyst 6 and (2) reagent 1a, for detailed information, see the Supplementary Information. (3) Arrhenius plot analysis. (4) Comparison of performance with single-component ruthenium(II) arene catalysts 6 and 7. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 8:15430 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15430 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications

5

ARTICLE


TMP N

Me

+ Alkyl Br Ar 1

Me

TMP NH

TMP NH

Me

2

Me (a)

R R2

Ar Alkyl

R 1 = R 2 = c-Hept (9a): 77% 9c:52% [a] R 1 = Me, R2 = n-Hex (9b): 75% One-pot One-pot

Me

Ar

O

n -Hex Me

then ArBr or n-HexBr

F

8

Me F

10a: 69%

10b: 56%

One-pot

One-pot

H3O+

(c)

HO

O

(b)

then ZnCl2 NaBH3CN

1

Me

TMP N

O Me

Mn(OAc)2

O

NH

PhNHNH2

Ar

t-Bu

Me Alkyl

F 3 11: 89%

m-CPBA then NaOH

OH

OH

F Me Me NH2OH•HCl 12: 58% then NaOH NH2

R3 Me Me Me 13a: 80%

F

Me Me

R3 = Me (13c): 93% R3 = C2H 4Cl (13b): 92%

Me

F

Me Me

14: 61%

Figure 6 | Late-stage diversification. The meta-C–H functionalization of ketimines 1 as transformative platform into synthetically meaningful and biologically significant compounds. For detailed information, see the Supplementary Information. (a) One-pot remote-C–H functionalization/reduction. [a]dr ¼ 1.0:1.2. (b) One-pot meta-C–H alkylation and ortho-C–H arylation/alkylation regime. (c) Late-stage diversification to access acids 11, indoles 12, phenols 13 and anilines 14. Ar ¼ 4-MeOC6H4.

Gratifyingly, sequential meta-C–H alkylation followed by ortho-C–H arylation or alkylation provided access to densely substituted aromatics 10 with no additional catalyst being required, showcasing the enabling power of our approach within a user-friendly multicatalysis regime. The unique synthetic versatility of the meta-substituted arenes 3 was further illustrated by transformative diversifications (Fig. 6), forming useful building blocks and biologically significant motifs, such as carboxylic acids 11, and indoles 12. In this regard, the preparation of meta-substituted phenols 13 and anilines 14 is particularly noteworthy, since classical methods of organic synthesis, such as the Friedel–Crafts reactions, fall short in providing access to the meta-decorated scaffolds due to the substrate’s inherent bias for ortho/para-guided selectivity. Discussion In summary, we have presented a versatile concept for the step-economical preparation of meta-substituted arenes by remote C–H functionalization. Henceforth, a considerable arene 6

ligand effect set the stage for a powerful ruthenium(II) catalysis manifold that expedited efficient secondary and tertiary C–H alkylations of easily accessible ketimines with exceptional positional selectivity. Operationally simple one-pot protocols delivered synthetically useful meta-functionalized benzyl amines, while multicatalytic C–H functionalizations produced densely meta-/ortho-substituted arenes within a one-pot process. The transformative nature of the approach was highlighted by the preparation of a wealth of meta-substituted arenes, including ketones, amines, indoles, acids and phenols. Methods General techniques. Catalytic reactions were performed under a N2 atmosphere using pre-dried glassware and standard Schlenk techniques. 1,4-Dioxane was dried over sodium and freshly distilled under N2. Yields refer to isolated compounds, estimated to be 495% pure as determined by 1H-nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR) and gas chromatography. Thin-layer chromatography was performed on Merck, TLC Silica Gel 60 F254 with detection under ultraviolet light at 254 nm. Chromatographic separations were carried out on Merck Geduran SI-60 (0.040–0.063 mm, 230–400 mesh ASTM). Infrared spectra were recorded on a Bruker FT-IR alpha-P device. Electron ionization mass spectrometry was recorded


ARTICLE


on Jeol AccuTOF at 70 eV; electrospray ionization mass spectrometry was recorded on Bruker Daltonik micrOTOF and maXis and LIFDI with a Linden CMS. Elemental analyses were measured on an Elementar Vario EL 3 analyser. Melting points were measured on Stuart melting point apparatus SMP3; values are uncorrected. NMR spectroscopy was performed at 300, 400 or 500 MHz (1H-NMR), 75, 100 or 125 MHz (13C-NMR, APT), 282, 376 or 470 MHz (19F-NMR) and 282 or 376 MHz (19F{1H}) on Bruker Avance III HD 300, Avance III 300, Avance III 400, Avance III HD 500, Varian Unity-300, Inova 500 and Inova 600 instruments. If not otherwise specified, chemical shifts (d) are provided in p.p.m. and spectra referred to non-deuterated solvent signal. Analytical high-performance liquid chromatography analysis was performed on Agilent 1260 Infinity equipped with Daicel CHIRALPAK IC-3 (4.6 mm 250 mm, 3 mm particle size, 1 ml min 1 flow rate). Optical rotary power was measured on Jasco P-2000 polarimeter as a 0.04 g per 100 ml solution in MeOH at 589 nm and 23.0 °C. For NMR spectra of all products in this article, see the Supplementary Figs 5–60. General procedure for catalysed meta-C–H alkylation. Ketimine 1 (0.50 mmol) [RuCl2(p-cymene)]2 (15.3 mg, 25.0 mmol), 1-AdCO2H (27.3 mg, 0.15 mmol) and K2CO3 (138 mg, 1.00 mmol) were placed in a pre-dried 25 ml pressure tube. The reaction tube was then evacuated and backfilled with nitrogen three times. Alkyl bromide 2 (1.50 mmol) and PhCMe3 (2.0 ml) were added and the mixture was stirred at 120 °C for 20 h. At ambient temperature, HCl (2 N, 3.0 ml) was added, and the resulting mixture was stirred for an additional 3 h, and extracted at ambient temperature with EtOAc or Et2O (3 20 ml). The combined organic layers were dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated in vacuo. Purification of the residue by column chromatography (n-hexane/EtOAc or n-pentane/Et2O) yielded phenone 3. Data availability. The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information files. All data are also available from the authors on reasonable request.

References 1. Shin, K., Kim, H. & Chang, S. Transition-metal-catalyzed C–N bond forming reactions using organic azides as the nitrogen source: a journey for the mild and versatile C–H amination. Acc. Chem. Res. 48, 1040–1052 (2015). 2. Wencel-Delord, J. & Glorius, F. C–H bond activation enables the rapid construction and late-stage diversification of functional molecules. Nat. Chem. 5, 369–375 (2013). 3. Hickman, A. J. & Sanford, M. S. High-valent organometallic copper and palladium in catalysis. Nature 484, 177–185 (2012). 4. Segawa, Y., Maekawa, T. & Itami, K. Synthesis of extended p-systems through C–H activation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 66–81 (2015). 5. Yeung, C. S. & Dong, V. M. Catalytic dehydrogenative cross-coupling: forming carbon–carbon bonds by oxidizing two carbon–hydrogen bonds. Chem. Rev. 111, 1215–1292 (2011). 6. Ackermann, L. Carboxylate-assisted transition metal-catalyzed C–H bond functionalizations: mechanism and scope. Chem. Rev. 111, 1315–1345 (2011). 7. Chen, X., Engle, K. M., Wang, D.-H. & Yu, J.-Q. Palladium(II)-catalyzed C–H activation/C–C cross-coupling reactions: versatility and practicality. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 5094–5115 (2009). 8. Godula, K. & Sames, D. C–H bond functionalization in complex organic synthesis. Science 312, 67–72 (2006). 9. Davies, H. M. L. & Manning, J. R. Catalytic C–H functionalization by metal carbenoid and nitrenoid insertion. Nature 451, 417–424 (2008). 10. Bergman, R. G. Organometallic chemistry: C–H activation. Nature 446, 391–393 (2007). 11. Osberger, T. J., Rogness, D. C., Kohrt, J. T., Stepan, A. F. & White, M. C. Oxidative diversification of amino acids and peptides by small-molecule iron catalysis. Nature 537, 214–219 (2016). 12. Cook, A. K., Schimler, S. D., Matzger, A. J. & Sanford, M. S. Catalyst-controlled selectivity in the C–H borylation of methane and ethane. Science 351, 1421–1424 (2016). 13. Topczewski, J. J., Cabrera, P. J., Saper, N. I. & Sanford, M. S. Palladium-catalysed transannular C-H functionalization of alicyclic amines. Nature 531, 220–224 (2016). 14. Calleja, J. et al. A steric tethering approach enables palladium-catalysed C–H activation of primary amino alcohols. Nat. Chem. 7, 1009–1016 (2015). 15. Phipps, R. J. & Gaunt, M. J. A meta-selective copper-catalyzed C–H bond arylation. Science 323, 1593–1597 (2009). 16. De Sarkar, S., Liu, W., Kozhushkov, S. I. & Ackermann, L. Weakly-coordinating directing groups for ruthenium(II)-catalyzed C–H activation. Adv. Synth. Catal. 356, 1461–1479 (2014). 17. Lyons, T. W. & Sanford, M. S. Palladium-catalyzed ligand-directed C–H functionalization reactions. Chem. Rev. 110, 1147–1169 (2010). 18. Colby, D. A., Bergman, R. G. & Ellman, J. A. Rhodium-catalyzed C–C bond formation via heteroatom-directed C–H bond activation. Chem. Rev. 110, 624–655 (2010).

19. Zhang, X., Kanzelberger, M., Emge, T. J. & Goldman, A. S. Selective addition to iridium of aryl C–H bonds ortho to coordinating groups. Not chelationassisted. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 13192–13193 (2004). 20. Wilhelm, T. & Lautens, M. Palladium-catalyzed alkylation–hydride reduction sequence: synthesis of meta-substituted arenes. Org. Lett. 7, 4053–4056 (2005). 21. Catellani, M. Catalytic multistep reactions via palladacycles. Synlett 298–313 (2003). 22. Wang, X.-C. et al. Ligand-enabled meta-C–H activation using a transient mediator. Nature 519, 334–338 (2015). 23. Bag, S. et al. Remote para-C–H functionalization of arenes by a D-shaped biphenyl template-based assembly. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 11888–11891 (2015). 24. Dong, Z., Wang, J. & Dong, G. Simple amine-directed meta-selective C–H arylation via Pd/norbornene catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 5887–5890 (2015). 25. Bera, M., Maji, A., Sahoo, S. K. & Maiti, D. Palladium(II)-catalyzed meta-C-H olefination: constructing multisubstituted arenes through homo-diolefination and sequential hetero-diolefination. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 8515–8519 (2015). 26. Li, S., Cai, L., Ji, H., Yang, L. & Li, G. Pd(II)-catalysed meta-C–H functionalizations of benzoic acid derivatives. Nat. Commun. 7, 10443 (2015). 27. Shen, P.-X., Wang, X.-C., Wang, P., Zhu, R.-Y. & Yu, J.-Q. Ligand-enabled meta-C–H alkylation and arylation using a modified norbornene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 11574–11577 (2015). 28. Tang, R. Y., Li, G. & Yu, J.-Q. Conformation-induced remote meta-C–H activation of amines. Nature 507, 215–220 (2014). 29. Leow, D., Li, G., Mei, T. S. & Yu, J.-Q. Activation of remote meta-C–H bonds assisted by an end-on template. Nature 486, 518–522 (2012). 30. Cho, J.-Y., Tse, M. K., Holmes, D., Maleczka, R. E. & Smith, M. R. Remarkably selective iridium catalysts for the elaboration of aromatic C–H bonds. Science 295, 305–308 (2002). 31. Kuninobu, Y., Ida, H., Nishi, M. & Kanai, M. A meta-selective C–H borylation directed by a secondary interaction between ligand and substrate. Nat. Chem. 7, 712–717 (2015). 32. Cheng, C. & Hartwig, J. F. Rhodium-catalyzed intermolecular C–H silylation of arenes with high steric regiocontrol. Science 343, 853–857 (2014). 33. Yu, Q., Hu, L., Wang, Y., Zheng, S. & Huang, J. Directed meta-selective bromination of arenes with ruthenium catalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 15284–15288 (2015). 34. Teskey, C. J., Lui, A. Y. W. & Greaney, M. F. Ruthenium-catalyzed metaselective C–H bromination. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 11677–11680 (2015). 35. Li, J. et al. N-acyl amino acid ligands for ruthenium(II)-catalyzed meta-C–H tert-alkylation with removable auxiliaries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 13894–13901 (2015). 36. Paterson, A. J., St John-Campbell, S., Mahon, M. F., Press, N. J. & Frost, C. G. Catalytic meta-selective C–H functionalization to construct quaternary carbon centres. Chem. Commun. 51, 12807–12810 (2015). 37. Hofmann, N. & Ackermann, L. meta-selective C–H bond alkylation with secondary alkyl halides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 5877–5884 (2013). 38. Saidi, O. et al. Ruthenium-catalyzed meta sulfonation of 2-phenylpyridines. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 19298–19301 (2011). 39. Ackermann, L., Hofmann, N. & Vicente, R. Carboxylate-assisted rutheniumcatalyzed direct alkylations of ketimines. Org. Lett. 13, 1875–1877 (2011). 40. Li, J., De Sarkar, S. & Ackermann, L. meta- and para-Selective C–H functionalization by C–H activation. Top. Organomet. Chem. 55, 217–257 (2016). 41. Zhang, F. & Spring, D. R. Arene C–H functionalisation using a removable/ modifiable or a traceless directing group strategy. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 6906–6919 (2014). 42. Bologa, C. G. et al. Virtual and biomolecular screening converge on a selective agonist for GPR30. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2, 207–212 (2006). 43. Kantor, T. G. Ketoprofen: a review of its pharmacologic and clinical properties. Pharmacotherapy 6, 93–102 (1986). 44. Lee, J. M., Na, Y., Han, H. & Chang, S. Cooperative multi-catalyst systems for one-pot organic transformations. Chem. Soc. Rev. 33, 302–312 (2004). 45. Ackermann, L., Nova´k, P., Vicente, R. & Hofmann, N. Ruthenium-catalyzed regioselective direct alkylation of arenes with unactivated alkyl halides through C–H bond cleavage. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 6045–6048 (2009). 46. Wang, D.-H., Engle, K. M., Shi, B.-F. & Yu, J.-Q. Ligand-enabled reactivity and selectivity in a synthetically versatile aryl C–H olefination. Science 327, 315–319 (2010). 47. Engle, K. M. & Yu, J.-Q. Developing ligands for palladium(II)-catalyzed C–H functionalization: intimate dialogue between ligand and substrate. J. Org. Chem. 78, 8927–8955 (2013). 48. Collins, K. D. & Glorius, F. A robustness screen for the rapid assessment of chemical reactions. Nat. Chem. 5, 597–601 (2013). 49. Clark, A. M., Rickard, C. E. F., Roper, W. R. & Wright, L. J. Electrophilic substitution reactions at the phenyl ring of the chelated 2-(20 -pyridyl)phenyl ligand bound to ruthenium(II) or osmium(II). Organometallics 18, 2813–2820 (1999). 50. Ye, J. et al. Remote C–H alkylation and C–C bond cleavage enabled by an in situ generated palladacycle. Nat. Chem. 9, 361–368 (2016).


7

ARTICLE


Acknowledgements Generous support by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation (fellowship to S.D.S.), the Chinese Scholarship Program (fellowship to J.L.), the DAAD (fellowship to K.K.), the DFG (SPP 1807) and the European Research Council under the European Community’s Seventh Framework Program (FP7 2007–2013)/ERC Grant Agreement No. 307535 is gratefully acknowledged.

How to cite this article: Li, J. et al. Ruthenium(II)-catalysed remote C–H alkylations as a versatile platform to meta-decorated arenes. Nat. Commun. 8, 15430 doi: 10.1038/ncomms15430 (2017). Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Author contributions J.L. developed the remote meta-C–H alkylation. S.D.S., K.K. and D.J.B. explored the substrate scope and the arene ligand effect. T.R. and S.W. conducted the mechanistic studies and T.R. performed the robustness test. L.A. conceived and supervised the project. L.A. wrote the manuscript.

Additional information Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at http://www.nature.com/ naturecommunications Competing interests: The authors declare no competing financial interests.

8

Reprints and permission information is available online at http://npg.nature.com/ reprintsandpermissions/

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

r The Author(s) 2017
