A) Interaction plots displaying the levels of one factor on the x-axis and the mean response on the y-axis for all cytokines analyzed. B) Interaction plots displaying ...
S5 Fig. Phenformin increased AMPK phosphorylation of PARP1 Ser-177 in HUVECs compared to glimepiride. Western blot analysis of AMPK Thr-172 and ...
Ahren (Albiglutide) [40]. 103. Ridderstrale [80]. 780. Subtotal (95% CI). 4068. Total events. Heterogeneity: Chi? = 1.68, df = 6 (P = 0.95); 12 = 0%. Test for overall ...
HIV-1 CRF35_AD gag (a-b) and pol (c-d) sequences and pure subtype reference sequences selected from the Los ... The trees are midpoint-rooted and scaled.
103. 104. 105 ctrl mAb c-kit mAb ctrl mAb c-kit mAb w. /o. G. M-C. SF. L ivin g ce ll p e rce n ta g e. (PI. -. An n e xin. V. - ). 1.04. 91.56. 4.10. 3.30. 0.81. 88.98. 6.12.
Supplementary Fig S5: (A) Close up on the Hoxd cluster region shown in IGB (Integrated Genome Browser) for the enrichments of Suz12 ChIP-on-chip as ...
(B) Percentage of spectra for for +2, +3, +4 and â¥5 charged ions from these three. MS2 acquisition methods. SP: SEQUEST-Percolator; MP: Mascot-Percolator.
Supplementary Fig. S2 : Full length blot of Fig. 2c (Fig. S2a) and Fig. 2d (Fig. S2b). HADF. 2183. -H e r4. 1300. -m e l. H. M. CB. 526. -m e l. 888. -m el. H s 294T ...
S5 Fig. The cumulative distribution functions of k- indegree for the general network (top left) and s- instrength (bottom left), suspected-HAI networks (top center, ...
S5 Fig. Demographics of proportion of the observed population engaging in MNF either 'often', 'sometimes' or 'never'. n = 68 n = 72 n = 77 n = 53. 0%. 10%.
Calibration curve used to estimate molecular weights for AChBPs. Size- exclusion chromatography column S200 10/300 was calibrated using Blue dextran.
H D H D. MMS (%). 0. 0.005. 0.01. WT srs2â mus81â mms4â. H D sgs1â. 0.02. H D H D. H D. WT slx1â yen1â. H D slx4â. H D H D. H D. WT mph1â rad10â. H D.
S5 Fig. Histogram of branching angles and optimal branching angles of MC. (material-cost) optimizations for mouse and human networks. All histograms show.
S5 Fig. Relations between estimated parameters in different ... - PLOS
We compared the individual parameters estimated for each of our drift (and best performing) models. The Reward-T and SSAT-T models' parameters for ...
S5 Fig. Relations between estimated parameters in different models in experiment 1. We compared the individual parameters estimated for each of our drift (and best performing) models. The Reward-T and SSAT-T models’ parameters for learning rates and threshold were almost identical for all our participants. Reward model gave the best fit to decisions, while the SSAT-T model gave the best fit to confidence reports. This indicates that these models may use a shared mechanism for decisions, but the SSAT-T model uses the reward variance information to generate confidence reports. Parameters estimations were not as similar for the SSAT-T and the Utility-T.