06.18. 2013. TITLE OF GRAPHICS. __. CONCEPT. EXAMPLE RATING
CRITERIA. EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA. PRIMARYCRITERIA.
ISSUESINCLUDED. A.
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
CONCEPT __
TITLE OF GRAPHICS
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
•DESIGN SELECTION
•ALT 3&4 SITE OPPORTUNITIES
•ALTERNATIVE 3
EXAMPLE WEIGHTING CRITERIA
TEMPLATE
AERIAL
EXAMPLE
CONCEPTS A-D PLAN & SECTION
MATRIX
CONCEPTS A-D 3D VIEWS
•ALTERNATIVES 1-4
•ALTTERNATIVE 4
•EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS
AERIAL
•ALT 1&2 SITE OPPORTUNITIES
3D VIEWS 1-4
•ALTERNATIVE 1
•PRECEDENTS
AERIALS - SHORT AND LONG
WOODEN CURVES
CONCEPTS A&B PLAN & SECTION
STAIRS WITH RAMPS
CONCEPTS A&B 3D VIEWS
BRIDGES
•ALTERNATIVE 2
CONCEPTS A-E PLAN & SECTION
•ALT 2 DESIGN ENHANCEMENTS
CONCEPTS A-E 3D VIEWS
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGY DESIGN ENHANCEMENTS 1-5
CONCEPT RATING EXAMPLE __ TITLECRITERIA OF GRAPHICS
EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA A B C D
PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
CONSTRUCTABILITY
o o o o
ADA COMPLIANCE
FEDERAL FUNDING
PIER BUSINESS IMPACTS
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
o o o o o
Minimize construction duration Minimize traffic impacts Maximize sustainability Accessibility meeting RFP objectives (full compliance) Pedestrian safety enhancements Comply with federal program guidelines Maximize federal funding participation for non-standard items Maximize access to Pier businesses Minimize impacts to Pier business
__ TITLE OF GRAPHICS CRITERIA WEIGHTING CONCEPT TEMPLATE
A vs. B
A vs. C B vs. C
A vs. D B vs. D C vs. D
NOTES: 1. Criteria A-J are compared in the table above. Compare criteria in each row with the criteria in each column. Example: Cell location (1,1) compares criteria A with criteria B. 2. "TOTAL" column sums up the number of occurrences of each criteria. 3. "CRITERIA WEIGHT (%)" column determines the percent of occurrences of each criteria by taking the number of occurrences of each criteria and SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013
TOTAL
CRITERIA WEIGHT (%)
0
0
D
C
B
CRITERIA A B C D
A
CRITERIA
A B C D
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
B
C
D
CRITERIA A B C D
A
__ TITLE OF GRAPHICS CRITERIA WEIGHTING CONCEPT EXAMPLE
A
C B
D B D
06.18. 2013
CRITERIA
TOTAL
CRITERIA WEIGHT (%)
A B C D
1 2 1 2 6
17 33 17 33 100
CONCEPT __ RANKING CRITERIA MATRIX TITLE OF GRAPHICS
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE REPLACEMENT RANKING CRITERIA MATRIX
No Project CRITERIA WEIGHT (%)
CRITERIA
1
2
BRIDGE ALTERNATIVE 4
3
5
6
7
8
Weighted Weighted Weighted Weighted Weighted Weighted Weighted Weighted Weighted Evaluation Evaluation Evaluation Evaluation Evaluation Evaluation Evaluation Evaluation Score Score Score Score Score Score Score Score Score
Evaluation
17
CONSTRUCTABILITY
0
6
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
33
ADA COMPLIANCE
0
5
167
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
FEDERAL FUNDING
0
4
67
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
33
MINIMIZE PIER BUSINESS IMPACTS
0
3
100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL WEIGHTED SCORE
0
433
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
#DIV/0!
COMMUNITY ACCEPTANCE (PASS/FAIL) COST SCORE/COST Bridge Alternative 1 A 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Description Two bike/pedestrian lanes, car lane center
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
Evaluation: 10 Best, satisfies the criteria very well 9 Closely satisfies the criteria 8 Good, satisfies the criteria comfortably 7 Adequately satisfies the criteria 6 Good, but there is more room to satisfy the criteria 5 Neither best nor least 4 Somewhat satisfies the criteria 3 Minimally satisfies the criteria 2 Attempts to satisfy the criteria 1 Least, does not satisfy the criteria or criteria doesn't apply
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
Notes: 1. Alternatives are ranked from 1 (least) to 10 (best) in each criteria. 2. Criteria weight determined based on its importance relative to other criteria
CONCEPT __ SUMMARY ALTERNATIVE TITLE OF GRAPHICS
ADA/ BICYCLE RAMP
ADA/ BICYCLE RAMP
ALTERNATIVE 1
ALTERNATIVE 2
REPLACE IN KIND
REPLACE IN KIND + ADA/ BICYCLE
VEHICULAR BRIDGE
VEHICULAR BRIDGE
MOSS AVE
MOSS AVE
EMERGENCY/ BIKE RAMP BIKE/ ADA RAMP BIKE/ ADA RAMP
ADA/ BICYCLE RAMP
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
ALTERNATIVE 3
ALTERNATIVE 4
NEW BRIDGE + ADA/ BICYCLE
NEW BRIDGE + EMERGENCY/ ADA/ BIKE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
CONCEPT __ SUMMARY ALTERNATIVE TITLE OF GRAPHICS
ADA/ BICYCLE RAMP
ADA/ BICYCLE RAMP
ALTERNATIVE 1
ALTERNATIVE 2
REPLACE IN KIND
REPLACE IN KIND + ADA/ BICYCLE
VEHICULAR BRIDGE
VEHICULAR BRIDGE
MOSS AVE
MOSS AVE
EMERGENCY/ BIKE RAMP BIKE/ ADA RAMP BIKE/ ADA RAMP
ADA/ BICYCLE RAMP
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
ALTERNATIVE 3
ALTERNATIVE 4
NEW BRIDGE + ADA/ BICYCLE
NEW BRIDGE + EMERGENCY/ ADA/ BIKE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
CONCEPT __ 1TITLE ALTERNATIVE - SHORT OF GRAPHICS
ADA RAMP 14% SLOPE VEHICULAR BRIDGE SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
CONCEPT __ 1TITLE ALTERNATIVE - LONG OF GRAPHICS
ADA RAMP 10% SLOPE VEHICULAR BRIDGE SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
PLAN & ELEVATION
Boardwalk
Ocean Ave
Moomat A hiko Way
ALTERNATIVE 1 CONCEPT A
Pier Sign
Existing Bridge Restrooms and Utilities Below
45’-0”
53’-0”
55’-6”
55’-6”
Appian Way
Ocean Front
Santa Monica Pier
49’-0”
49’-0”
55’-6”
55’-6”
42’-0”
42’-0”
Optional Elevator Tower Ocean Ave Moomat Ahiko Way Appian Way Boardwalk
Santa Monica Pier
Ocean Front Walk
Cut Section for Elevator
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
RAMP LENGTH - 499.77'
ALTERNATIVE 1 CONCEPT A
PERSPECTIVE & BRIDGE SECTION
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
PLAN & ELEVATION
Boardwalk
Ocean Ave
Moomat A hiko Way
ALTERNATIVE 1 CONCEPT B
Pier Sign
Existing Bridge Restrooms and Utilities Below
45’-0”
53’-0”
55’-6”
55’-6”
Appian Way
Ocean Front
Santa Monica Pier
49’-0”
49’-0”
55’-6”
55’-6”
42’-0”
42’-0”
Optional Elevator Tower Ocean Ave Moomat Ahiko Way Appian Way Boardwalk
Santa Monica Pier
Ocean Front Walk
Cut Section for Elevator
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
RAMP LENGTH - 499.77'
ALTERNATIVE 1 CONCEPT B
PERSPECTIVE & BRIDGE SECTION
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
CONCEPT __ SUMMARY ALTERNATIVE TITLE OF GRAPHICS
ADA/ BICYCLE RAMP
ADA/ BICYCLE RAMP
ALTERNATIVE 1
ALTERNATIVE 2
REPLACE IN KIND
REPLACE IN KIND + ADA/ BICYCLE
VEHICULAR BRIDGE
VEHICULAR BRIDGE
MOSS AVE
MOSS AVE
EMERGENCY/ BIKE RAMP BIKE/ ADA RAMP BIKE/ ADA RAMP
ADA/ BICYCLE RAMP
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
ALTERNATIVE 3
ALTERNATIVE 4
NEW BRIDGE + ADA/ BICYCLE
NEW BRIDGE + EMERGENCY/ ADA/ BIKE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
ALTERNATIVE __ 2TITLE CONCEPT VEHICULAR OF GRAPHICS BRIDGE + ADA RAMP
ADA RAMP 10% SLOPE VEHICULAR BRIDGE SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013
PLAN & ELEVATION
Boardwalk
Ocean Ave
Moomat A hiko Way
ALTERNATIVE 2 CONCEPT A
Pier Sign
Existing Bridge Restrooms and Utilities Below
45’-0”
53’-0”
55’-6”
55’-6”
Appian Way
Ocean Front
Santa Monica Pier
49’-0”
49’-0”
55’-6”
55’-6”
42’-0”
42’-0”
Optional Elevator Tower
1
20
Ocean Ave Moomat Ahiko Way Appian Way
Boardwalk
Santa Monica Pier
Ocean Front Walk
Cut Section for Elevator
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
RAMP LENGTH - 840'
ALTERNATIVE 2 CONCEPT A
PERSPECTIVE & BRIDGE SECTION
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
PLAN & ELEVATION
Boardwalk
Ocean Ave
Moomat A hiko Way
ALTERNATIVE 2 CONCEPT B
Pier Sign
Existing Bridge Restrooms and Utilities Below
45’-0”
53’-0”
55’-6”
55’-6”
Appian Way
Ocean Front
Santa Monica Pier
49’-0”
49’-0”
55’-6”
55’-6”
42’-0”
42’-0”
Optional Elevator Tower
1
20
Ocean Ave Moomat Ahiko Way Appian Way
Boardwalk
Santa Monica Pier
Ocean Front Walk
Cut Section for Elevator
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
RAMP LENGTH - 780.5'
ALTERNATIVE 2 CONCEPT B
PERSPECTIVE & BRIDGE SECTION
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
PLAN & ELEVATION
Boardwalk
Ocean Ave
Moomat A hiko Way
ALTERNATIVE 2 CONCEPT B2
Pier Sign
Existing Bridge Restrooms and Utilities Below
45’-0”
53’-0”
55’-6”
55’-6”
Appian Way
Ocean Front
Santa Monica Pier
49’-0”
49’-0”
55’-6”
55’-6”
42’-0”
42’-0”
Optional Elevator Tower
1
20
Ocean Ave Moomat Ahiko Way Appian Way
Boardwalk
Santa Monica Pier
Ocean Front Walk
Cut Section for Elevator
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
RAMP LENGTH - 780.5'
ALTERNATIVE 2 CONCEPT B2
PERSPECTIVE & BRIDGE SECTION
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
PLAN & ELEVATION
Boardwalk
Ocean Ave
Moomat A hiko Way
ALTERNATIVE 2 CONCEPT C
Pier Sign
Existing Bridge Restrooms and Utilities Below
45’-0”
53’-0”
55’-6”
55’-6”
Appian Way
Ocean Front
Santa Monica Pier
49’-0”
49’-0”
55’-6”
55’-6”
42’-0”
42’-0”
Optional Elevator Tower 1
20 Ocean Ave Moomat Ahiko Way Appian Way
Boardwalk
Santa Monica Pier
Ocean Front Walk
Cut Section for Elevator
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
RAMP LENGTH - 883.75'
ALTERNATIVE 2 CONCEPT C
PERSPECTIVE & BRIDGE SECTION
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
PLAN & ELEVATION
Boardwalk
Ocean Ave
Moomat A hiko Way
ALTERNATIVE 2 CONCEPT C2
Pier Sign
Existing Bridge Restrooms and Utilities Below
45’-0”
53’-0”
55’-6”
55’-6”
Appian Way
Ocean Front
Santa Monica Pier
49’-0”
49’-0”
55’-6”
55’-6”
42’-0”
42’-0”
Optional Elevator Tower 1
20 Ocean Ave Moomat Ahiko Way Appian Way
Boardwalk
Santa Monica Pier
Ocean Front Walk
Cut Section for Elevator
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
RAMP LENGTH - 883.75'
ALTERNATIVE 2 CONCEPT C2
PERSPECTIVE & BRIDGE SECTION
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
CONCEPT __ 2TITLE ALTERNATIVE CONCEPT C2 OF GRAPHICS VIEW C
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
PLAN & ELEVATION
Boardwalk
Ocean Ave
Moomat A hiko Way
ALTERNATIVE 2 CONCEPT D
Pier Sign
Existing Bridge Restrooms and Utilities Below
45’-0”
53’-0”
55’-6”
55’-6”
Appian Way
Ocean Front
Santa Monica Pier
49’-0”
49’-0”
55’-6”
55’-6”
42’-0”
42’-0”
Optional Elevator Tower
1
20
Ocean Ave Moomat Ahiko Way Appian Way
Boardwalk
Santa Monica Pier
Ocean Front Walk
Cut Section for Elevator
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
RAMP LENGTH - 867.5'
ALTERNATIVE 2 CONCEPT D
PERSPECTIVE & BRIDGE SECTION
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
PLAN & ELEVATION
Boardwalk
Ocean Ave
Moomat A hiko Way
ALTERNATIVE 2 CONCEPT E
Pier Sign
Existing Bridge Restrooms and Utilities Below
45’-0”
53’-0”
55’-6”
55’-6”
Appian Way
Ocean Front
Santa Monica Pier
49’-0”
49’-0”
55’-6”
55’-6”
42’-0”
42’-0”
Optional Elevator Tower 1
12 Ocean Ave Moomat Ahiko Way Appian Way
Boardwalk
Santa Monica Pier
Ocean Front Walk
Cut Section for Elevator
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
RAMP LENGTH - 896.25'
ALTERNATIVE 2 CONCEPT E
PERSPECTIVE & BRIDGE SECTION
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
CONCEPT __
TITLE OF GRAPHICS
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
CONCEPT __ SUMMARY ALTERNATIVE TITLE OF GRAPHICS
ADA/ BICYCLE RAMP
ADA/ BICYCLE RAMP
ALTERNATIVE 1
ALTERNATIVE 2
REPLACE IN KIND
REPLACE IN KIND + ADA/ BICYCLE
VEHICULAR BRIDGE
VEHICULAR BRIDGE
MOSS AVE
MOSS AVE
EMERGENCY/ BIKE RAMP BIKE/ ADA RAMP BIKE/ ADA RAMP
ADA/ BICYCLE RAMP
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
ALTERNATIVE 3
ALTERNATIVE 4
NEW BRIDGE + ADA/ BICYCLE
NEW BRIDGE + EMERGENCY/ ADA/ BIKE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
CONCEPT __ 3TITLE ALTERNATIVE MOSS OF GRAPHICS AVE BRIDGE + ADA RAMP
ADA RAMP VEHICULAR BRIDGE SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
Boardwalk
Ocean Ave
Moomat A hiko Way
CONCEPT __ 3TITLE ALTERNATIVE CONCEPT A OF GRAPHICS PLAN & ELEVATION
Pier Sign
Existing Bridge Restrooms and Utilities Below
Appian Way
Ocean Front
Santa Monica Pier
Moss Avenue Bridge
70’-0”
65’-0” Gap
113’-6”
Optional Elevator Tower 1 12
Boardwalk
20
Ocean Ave Moomat Ahiko Way
1
Appian Way
Santa Monica Pier
Ocean Front Walk
RAMP LENGTH - 1033.36'
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
CONCEPT KEY VIEWS__
TITLE OF GRAPHICS VIEW C - ALTERNATIVE 3 CONCEPT A
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
Boardwalk
Ocean Ave
Moomat A hiko Way
CONCEPT __ 3TITLE ALTERNATIVE CONCEPT B OF GRAPHICS PLAN & ELEVATION
Pier Sign
Existing Bridge Restrooms and Utilities Below
Appian Way
Ocean Front
Santa Monica Pier
Moss Avenue Bridge
70’-0”
65’-0” Gap
113’-6”
Optional Elevator Tower 1
20 Ocean Ave Moomat Ahiko Way Appian Way
Boardwalk
Santa Monica Pier
Ocean Front Walk
RAMP LENGTH - 765.82'
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
Boardwalk
Ocean Ave
Moomat A hiko Way
CONCEPT __ 3TITLE ALTERNATIVE CONCEPT B2 OF GRAPHICS PLAN & ELEVATION
Pier Sign
Existing Bridge Restrooms and Utilities Below
Appian Way
Ocean Front
Santa Monica Pier
Moss Avenue Bridge
70’-0”
65’-0” Gap
113’-6”
Optional Elevator Tower 1
20 Ocean Ave Moomat Ahiko Way Appian Way
Boardwalk
Santa Monica Pier
Ocean Front Walk
RAMP LENGTH - 765.82'
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
Boardwalk
Ocean Ave
Moomat A hiko Way
CONCEPT __ 3TITLE ALTERNATIVE CONCEPT C OF GRAPHICS PLAN & ELEVATION
Pier Sign
Existing Bridge Restrooms and Utilities Below
Appian Way
Ocean Front
Santa Monica Pier
Moss Avenue Bridge
70’-0”
65’-0” Gap
113’-6”
Optional Elevator Tower 1
20 Ocean Ave Moomat Ahiko Way Appian Way
Boardwalk
Santa Monica Pier
Ocean Front Walk
RAMP LENGTH - 799.82'
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
Boardwalk
Ocean Ave
Moomat A hiko Way
CONCEPT __ 3TITLE ALTERNATIVE CONCEPT C2 OF GRAPHICS PLAN & ELEVATION
Pier Sign
Existing Bridge Restrooms and Utilities Below
Appian Way
Ocean Front
Santa Monica Pier
Moss Avenue Bridge
70’-0”
65’-0” Gap
113’-6”
Optional Elevator Tower 1
20 Ocean Ave Moomat Ahiko Way Appian Way
Boardwalk
Santa Monica Pier
Ocean Front Walk
RAMP LENGTH - 799.82'
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
CONCEPT KEY VIEWS__
TITLE OF GRAPHICS VIEW C - ALTERNATIVE 3 CONCEPT C
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
Boardwalk
Ocean Ave
Moomat A hiko Way
CONCEPT __ 3TITLE ALTERNATIVE CONCEPT D OF GRAPHICS PLAN & ELEVATION
Pier Sign
Existing Bridge Restrooms and Utilities Below
Appian Way
Ocean Front
Santa Monica Pier
Moss Avenue Bridge
70’-0”
65’-0” Gap
113’-6”
Optional Elevator Tower 1
20 Ocean Ave Moomat Ahiko Way Appian Way
Boardwalk
Santa Monica Pier
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
Ocean Front Walk
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
RAMP LENGTH - 880.94'
Boardwalk
Ocean Ave
Moomat A hiko Way
CONCEPT __ 3TITLE ALTERNATIVE CONCEPT D2 OF GRAPHICS PLAN & ELEVATION
Pier Sign
Existing Bridge Restrooms and Utilities Below
Appian Way
Ocean Front
Santa Monica Pier
Moss Avenue Bridge
70’-0”
65’-0” Gap
113’-6”
Optional Elevator Tower 1
20 Ocean Ave Moomat Ahiko Way Appian Way
Boardwalk
Santa Monica Pier
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
Ocean Front Walk
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
RAMP LENGTH - 880.94'
CONCEPT __ SUMMARY ALTERNATIVE TITLE OF GRAPHICS
ADA/ BICYCLE RAMP
ADA/ BICYCLE RAMP
ALTERNATIVE 1
ALTERNATIVE 2
REPLACE IN KIND
REPLACE IN KIND + ADA/ BICYCLE
VEHICULAR BRIDGE
VEHICULAR BRIDGE
MOSS AVE
MOSS AVE
EMERGENCY/ BIKE RAMP BIKE/ ADA RAMP BIKE/ ADA RAMP
ADA/ BICYCLE RAMP
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
ALTERNATIVE 3
ALTERNATIVE 4
NEW BRIDGE + ADA/ BICYCLE
NEW BRIDGE + EMERGENCY/ ADA/ BIKE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
CONCEPT __ 4TITLE ALTERNATIVE MOSS OF GRAPHICS AVE BRIDGE + INTEGRATED ADA RAMP
ADA RAMP 10% SLOPE EMERGENCY + VEHICULAR BRIDGE SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
CONCEPT ALT 4 __
TITLE PERSPECTIVE OF GRAPHICS 1
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
CONCEPT ALT 4 __
TITLE PERSPECTIVE OF GRAPHICS 2
15 FT CLEARANCE ENVELOPE SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
CONCEPT ALT 4 __
TITLE PERSPECTIVE OF GRAPHICS 3
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
CONCEPT ALT 4 __
TITLE PERSPECTIVE OF GRAPHICS 4
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
CONCEPT __ PRECEDENTS
TITLE OF GRAPHICS WOODEN CURVES
COUNTOURED WOOD BRIDGE CONCEPT, VIENNA
SIMCOE WAVEDECK, TORONTO
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
SIMCOE WAVEDECK, TORONTO
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
COUNTOURED WOOD BRIDGE CONCEPT, VIENNA
ISSUES INCLUDED
ONE MAIN STREET, BELLEVUE CONDOS
WILD REINDEER REFUGE, NORWAY
CONCEPT __ PRECEDENTS
TITLE OFWITH STAIRS GRAPHICS RAMP
AACHEN MUNCHENER HQ, GERMANY
AACHEN MUNCHENER HQ, GERMANY
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
PIONEER COURTHOUSE SQUARE, PORTLAND, OR
PIONEER COURTHOUSE SQUARE, PORTLAND, OR
ROBSON SQUARE, VANCOUVER
ROBSON SQUARE, VANCOUVER
CONCEPT __ PRECEDENTS
TITLE OF GRAPHICS BRIDGES
CASTLEFORD BRIDGE, ENGLAND
SASSNITZ FOOTBRIDGE, GERMANY
CASTLEFORD BRIDGE, ENGLAND
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
CAN GILI FOOTBRIDGE, SPAIN
CONCEPT __ PRECEDENTS
TITLE OF GRAPHICS BRIDGES
KENT MESSENGER BRIDGE, ENGLAND
MUSEUM PARK FOOTBRIDGE, NETHERLANDS
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
YORK MILLENIUM BRIDGE, ENGLAND
YORK MILLENIUM BRIDGE, ENGLAND
BORREGAS PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE, CALIFORNIA
ROYAL VICTORIA DOCK BRIDGE, ENGLAND
CONCEPT __ PRECEDENTS
TITLE OF GRAPHICS SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGY
WIND TURBINE BRIDGE, ITALY
PERTH PHOTO-BIOREACTOR INSTALLATION, AUSTRALIA
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
KURILPA BRIDGE, AUSTRALIA
PAVEGEN FLOOR TILES, ENGLAND
CONCEPT __ PRECEDENTS
TITLE OF GRAPHICS SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGY
MODULAR ALGAE PHOTO-BIOREACTOR
ALGAE BIOREACTOR TOWER
ALGAE BIOREACTOR ROOF CANOPY CELLULAR SOLAR TOWER, ITALY
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
ROOF TOP WIND FARM, OKLAHOMA
CONCEPT __
TITLE OF GRAPHICS
END OF PRESENTATION
PROCEEDING SLIDES ARE TO BE SHOWN IF DEEMED NECESSARY
SANTA MONICA PIER BRIDGE
06.18. 2013 EXAMPLE RATING CRITERIA PRIMARY CRITERIA
ISSUES INCLUDED
