Serotypes Profile of Salmonella Isolates from Meat and Poultry ...

United States Department of Agriculture

Food Safety And Inspection Service

Serotypes Profile of Salmonella Isolates from Meat and Poultry Products January 1998 through December 2013 Table of Contents

Salmonella serotype Report

Page 1-4

Table and Figures

5-126

Tables Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Table 1 - Young Chicken (Broilers) Table 2 - Market Hogs Table 3 - Cows/Bulls Table 4 - Steers/Heifers Table 5 - Ground Beef Table 6 - Ground Chicken Table 7 - Ground Turkey Table 8 - Young Turkeys (Turkey Carcasses)

Page 5 21 36 49 60 75 90 107

Figures Figure 1 Top Three Salmonella Serotypes for Each Product Class (2013) PR/HACCP Verification Sampling Ground Beef Young Chicken (Broilers) Ground Chicken Young Turkey Ground Turkey

115 116 116 117 117

Figure 2 Serotype Profiles in FSIS Product Classes for Top 10 Serotypes Identified by CDC as Causing Human Infections in 2013 – USDA, FSIS, PR/HACCP Verification Sampling by Calendar Year*(1998–2005 - “A” Set Samples; 2006-2013 - All Samples) Poultry (S. Enteritidis) Cattle – Ground Beef (S. Enteritidis)

118 118

United States Department of Agriculture Poultry (S. Typhimurium) Cattle (S. Typhimurium) Poultry (S. Newport) Cattle – Ground Beef (S. Newport) Poultry (S. Javiana) Cattle – Ground Beef (S. Javiana) Poultry (S. I 4,[5],12:I:-) Cattle – Ground Beef (S. I 4,[5],12:I:-) Poultry (S. Montevideo) Cattle – Ground Beef (S. Montevideo) Poultry (S. Infantis) Cattle – Ground Beef (S. Infantis) Poultry (S. Muenchen) Cattle – Ground Beef (S. Muenchen) Poultry (S. Heidelberg) Cattle (S. Heidelberg)

Food Safety And Inspection Service 119 119 120 120 121 121 122 122 123 123 124 124 125 125 126 126

*Note: Salmonella Bareilly was ranked as number 10 in the Center of Disease Control and Prevention’s list of the most frequently reported serotypes in the US in 2012. There has been no Salmonella Bareilly isolates detected in the PR/HACCP program in the 16 years of testing and they are therefore not included in this report.



Serotypes Profile of Salmonella Isolates from Meat and Poultry Products January 1998 through December 2013 The Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) conducts Salmonella serotype testing on sample isolates collected from raw meat and poultry products at all slaughter facilities under the Pathogen Reduction Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (PR/HACCP) program ( 1). The serotype results are presented here and provide an estimate of relative serotype distributions in raw products for each product class during the 16-year period following implementation of the PR/HACCP program (1998-2013). The information in this report supports food safety national strategic goals to better understand Salmonella as a foodborne pathogen.

Background In the early- to mid-1990s, FSIS conducted nationwide microbiological baseline studies that estimated the prevalence and levels of bacteria of public health concern in specific food commodities (10). FSIS used this information to develop performance standards for carcasses of cow/bulls, steers/heifers, market hogs (2), broilers, ground beef, ground chicken, and ground turkey (5,10). In July 1996, FSIS published the (PR/HACCP) Systems, Final Rule, which established Salmonella performance standards for establishments that slaughter or produce selected classes of food animals or raw ground products (4). The Salmonella performance standards provide a measurable standard by which industry can calibrate their HACCP systems and FSIS inspection personnel can monitor the effectiveness of an establishment’s HACCP controls. The performance standards include a description of the maximum number of positive samples allowed in a sample set. The number of samples and allowable positives in a sample set vary by product class and pathogen. In June 2006, FSIS implemented Salmonella performance standards for turkey carcasses (10). In 2011, FSIS implemented more stringent standards for Salmonella and Campylobacter in poultry carcasses (chicken/turkey) (8). Prior to 2006, there were two phases of the PR/HACCP for Salmonella in raw products: non-targeted and targeted testing. FSIS collected non-targeted or "A" set samples at establishments randomly selected from the population of eligible establishments with a goal of scheduling every eligible establishment at least once a year. Other codes (such as "B", "C", and "D") represented sample sets collected from establishments targeted for follow-up testing following a failed set. In June 2006, FSIS began to schedule establishments based on new criteria that are risk-based, rather than random (6,7). The new scheduling criteria focused FSIS resources on establishments with the most Salmonella-positive samples, including serotypes most frequently associated with human salmonellosis (3). As a result of this change in sampling, results from establishments prior to June 2006 cannot be compared to those reported following the new schedule. For such comparisons, nationwide baseline study results provide valid estimates of the prevalence of certain pathogens of public health concern and allow for valid statistical comparison over time (10).

1

Egg products under jurisdiction of USDA/FSIS are not currently under HACCP regulations. FSIS suspended scheduling cows/bulls from sampling in 2011 and market hogs and steer/heifers in 2012 because of the low number of positive samples.

2

1



Highlights, 2013 In 2013, FSIS identified and serotyped 878 Salmonella-positive meat or poultry samples. The “top ten” most common serotypes identified include: 1. Kentucky 28% (248/878) 2. Montevideo 10% (89/878) 3. Enteritidis 9.4% (83/878) 4. Typhimurium 8.7% (77/878) 5. Infantis 4.8% (43/878) 6. Heidelberg 4.1% (36/878) 7. I 4,[5],12:i:- 3.6% (32/878) 8. Schwarzengrund 2.6% (23/878) 9. Muenchen 2.5% (22/878) 10. Dublin 2.1% (19/878) and Newport 2.1% (19/878) FSIS compares the CDC data on serotypes isolated from human salmonellosis cases to Salmonella serotype data isolated from meat and poultry products (1,2,3). In 2012, the CDC identified Enteritidis, Typhimurium (including Typhimurium var. 5-), Newport, Javiana, I 4,[5],12:i:-, Montevideo, Infantis, Muenchen, Heidelberg, and Bareilly as the ten most commonly identified serotypes causing human salmonellosis in the United States (3). The top 10 serotypes found in meat and poultry products in 2013 that were among CDC’s top 10 list for 2012 were Enteritidis, Typhimurium, Newport, Heidelberg, Infantis, I 4,[5],12:i:-, Montevideo, and Muenchen (3). Because human salmonellosis cases are attributable to non-FSIS regulated foods and non-food sources, FSIS works closely with its public health partners to identify the proportion of human salmonellosis attributable to FSIS regulated products. Summary of PR/HACCP Data (1998-2013) Since 1998, Salmonella Kentucky has ranked as the most common serotype identified among young chicken (broilers) samples during the last 16 years. Prior to 2005, Salmonella Heidelberg has ranked as the second most common serotype in broilers. Since then Salmonella Enteriditis has ranked in the second position among broilers. For ground chicken samples, Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Kentucky alternate between the first and second most common serotypes. For ground turkey samples, Salmonella Heidelberg ranked as the most common serotype identified followed by Salmonella Hadar. For young turkey (turkey carcasses) sample sets, that began in 2006, Salmonella Hadar has ranked as the most common serotype identified followed by Salmonella Heidelberg. Because of the low number of positive samples recovered from the cow/bull and steer/heifer product classes, sample set scheduling was suspended for cow/bulls in 2011 and steer/heifers in 2012.

2



From 1998-2010, Salmonella Derby was ranked as the most common serotype in market hogs. In 2011, Salmonella Adelaide ranked as the most common serotype and S. Derby moved to the number three position. In 2012, Salmonella St. Paul was the only identified serotype in market hogs. Market hog sampling was suspended in 2012 due to the low number of positive samples. Tables and Figures Each table presented in this report identifies the ten most common Salmonella serotypes isolated annually per specific product class (1998-2013). When more than one serotype ranks in tenth place, each serotype in tenth place is listed (Table 1-8). The 10 most common serotypes isolated from a specified product class during a given year are identified by name while less commonly identified serotypes are included in the "other serotypes" category. When FSIS could not identify a specific serotype or identified a sample as monophasic 3 or nonmotile 4, the sample was entered as “Unidentified” in the tables. Samples that FSIS was unable to serotype are listed in the tables as “Not typed." Each table includes the number of isolates of each serotype and category, the percent of total serotyped isolates, and the percent of total samples collected. Figure 1 displays, by year, the three most common serotypes isolated from ground beef, young chicken, ground chicken and young, turkey from 1998-2013. Five serotypes are listed in the number one position for ground turkey. Figure 2 identifies the proportion of CDC’s top 20 serotypes that cause human salmonellosis in the United States out of the total Salmonellae isolated through PR/HACCP testing of meat and poultry products. The more commonly isolated serotypes in human salmonellosis cases vary from year-toyear both within and between product classes. Conclusion Recurring critical review and analysis of Salmonella serotype data support both Healthy People 2020 goals and FSIS’ strategic goals to reduce salmonellosis illnesses attributable to FSIS regulated products. The serotype data along with other sampling data collected through the PR/HACCP program is used to inform FSIS regulatory decisions and Agency policy development, inform in-plant best practices and outbreak investigations, and advance our understanding of Salmonella as a foodborne pathogen. To more closely estimate the prevalence of Salmonella in FSIS products and monitor trends, FSIS is changing its current sampling scheme from a set-based model to a continuous sampling model using moving windows to assess process control (9). The moving window approach provides FSIS with more flexibility for scheduling sample collection at different establishments.

3 4

Monophasic means that the Salmonella will produce only one kind of flagellin based on its genetic make-up. Non-motile means that there is no genetic code in the Salmonella for the development of a functional flagellin.

3



References 1

CDC.2006. PHLIS Surveillance Data, Salmonella Annual Summary. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dbmd/phlisdata/salmonella.htm

2

CDC. 2013. Vital Signs: Incidence and Trends of Infection with Pathogens Transmitted Commonly Through Food – Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network, 10 U.S. Sites, 1996 – 2012. http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6215a2.htm?s_cid=mm6215a2_w 3

CDC. 2014. National Enteric Disease Surveillance: Salmonella Annual Report, 2012. http://www.cdc.gov/ncezid/dfwed/pdfs/salmonella-annual-report-2012-508c.pdf

4

Federal Register. 1996. Pathogen Reduction; Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) Systems, Final Rule. 5

Federal Register. 2005. Generic E. Coli and Salmonella Baseline Results. Available at: http://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/wcm/connect/d6fe7505-36be-4a1f-afe6-4e633d2dacc8/02046N.pdf?MOD=AJPERES 6

Federal Register. 2006. Salmonella Verification Sample Results Reporting: Agency Policy and Use in Public Health Protection http://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/wcm/connect/fea66683-f22a-43d2-a97ee6c850fd67bc/04-026N.pdf?MOD=AJPERES 7

Federal Register. 2008. Salmonella Verification Sampling Program: Response to Comments and New Agency Policies. 8

FSIS. 2011. New Performance Standards for Salmonella and Campylobacter in Chilled Carcasses at Young Chicken and Turkey Slaughter Establishments. http://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/wcm/connect/49d574f1-b0cc-4777-ab08-98f1c50455f2/20090034.pdf?MOD=AJPERES 9

FSIS, 2015. The FSIS Salmonella Action Plan: A Year One Update. http://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/food-safety-education/get-answers/food-safetyfact-sheets/foodborne-illness-and-disease/salmonella/sap-one-year 10

FSIS, 2015. Baseline data. http://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/fsis/topics/data-collection-andreports/microbiology/baseline/baseline

4



Table 1 Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Young Chicken (Broilers) (1998–2005 'A“ Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 1998 Kentucky Heidelberg Typhimurium var. Copenhagen Typhimurium Hadar Schwarzengrund Montevideo Enteritidis Thompson Infantis Istanbul a Other serotypes u nidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates 139 92 41 40 33 21 16 14 14 7 7 58 39 521 92 613

Percent of Total Positive 26.68 17.66 7.87 7.68 6.33 4.03 3.07 2.69 2.69 1.34 1.34 11.13 7.49

Percent of Analyzed Samples 2.46 1.63 0.72 0.71 0.58 0.37 0.28 0.25 0.25 0.12 0.12 1.02 0.69 9.21 1.63 10.83

5,659

5



Table 1—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Young Chicken (Broilers) (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 1999 Kentucky Heidelberg Hadar Typhimurium var. Copenhagen Typhimurium Thompson Litchfield Infantis Schwarzengrund Istanbul a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates 188 138 83 52 41 30 16 15 12 11 102 43 731 41 772

Percent of Total Positive 25.72 18.88 11.35 7.11 5.61 4.10 2.19 2.05 1.64 1.50 13.95 5.88

Percent of Analyzed Samples 2.78 2.04 1.23 0.77 0.61 0.44 0.24 0.22 0.18 0.16 1.51 0.64 10.80 0.61 11.41

6,768

6



Table 1—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Young Chicken (Broilers) (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2000 Kentucky Heidelberg Typhimurium var. Copenhagen Typhimurium Hadar Montevideo Thompson Schwarzengrund Enteritidis Berta a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed Total positive Total number of analyzed samples




10,057

7



Table 1—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Young Chicken (Broilers) (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2001

Kentucky Heidelberg Typhimurium Typhimurium var. Copenhagen Montevideo Schwarzengrund Hadar Thompson Enteritidis Berta a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates

Percent of Total Positive

352 260 67 35 32 32 31 26 17 13 121 62 1048 17 1065

33.59 24.81 6.39 3.34 3.05 3.05 2.96 2.48 1.62 1.24 11.55 5.92


8,955

8



Table 1—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Young Chicken (Broilers) (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2002 Kentucky Heidelberg Typhimurium var. Copenhagen Hadar Typhimurium Enteritidis Thompson Montevideo Schwarzengrund Infantis Mbandaka a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples




9,183

9



Table 1—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Young Chicken (Broilers) (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2003 Kentucky Heidelberg Typhimurium var. Copenhagen Typhimurium Enteritidis Infantis Thompson Montevideo Hadar Mbandaka a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples




6,468

10



Table 1—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Young Chicken (Broilers) (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2004 Kentucky Heidelberg Typhimurium var. Copenhagen Enteritidis Typhimurium c I 4,[5],12:i:Schwarzengrund Montevideo Mbandaka Infantis a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates


409 145 84 58 50 29 27 20 15 12 105 3 957 0 957

42.74 15.15 8.78 6.06 5.22 3.03 2.82 2.09 1.57 1.25 10.97 0.31

Percent of Analyzed Samples 5.78 2.05 1.19 0.82 0.71 0.41 0.38 0.28 0.21 0.17 1.48 0.04 13.53 13.53

7,072

11



Table 1—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Young Chicken (Broilers) (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2005 Kentucky Heidelberg Typhimurium Enteritidis c I 4,[5],12:i:Montevideo Schwarzengrund Thompson Hadar Mbandaka a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates


703 226 147 120 87 54 44 18 16 16 121 4 1556 3 1559

45.18 14.52 9.45 7.71 5.58 3.47 2.83 1.16 1.03 1.03 7.78 0.26


9,592

12



Table 1 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Young Chicken (Broilers) (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2006 Kentucky Enteritidis Heidelberg Typhimurium c I 4,[5]12:i:Montevideo Schwarzengrund Infantis Mbandaka a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates


570 159 132 94 70 19 15 12 12 75 6 1164 0 1164

48.97 13.66 11.34 8.08 6.01 1.63 1.29 1.03 1.03 6.44 0.52

Percent of Analyzed Samples 5.58 1.56 1.29 0.92 0.68 0.19 0.15 0.12 0.12 0.73 0.06 11.41 11.41

10,206

13



Table 1 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Young Chicken (Broilers) (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2007

Kentucky Heidelberg Enteritidis Typhimurium c I 4,[5],12:i:Montevideo Berta Infantis Mbandaka a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates


Percent of Analyzed Samples

379 108 87 72 37 18 12 12 9 67 3 804 0 804

47.14 13.43 10.82 8.96 4.6 2.24 1.49 1.49 1.12 8.33 0.37

4.03 1.15 0.92 0.77 0.39 0.19 0.13 0.13 0.10 0.71 0.03 8.55 8.55

9,408

14




Kentucky Enteritidis Heidelberg Typhimurium c I 4,[5],12:i:Infantis Montevideo Schwarzengrund Senftenberg Thompson a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates



179 89 63 56 16 10 10 7 5 5 41 5 486 0 486

36.83 18.31 12.96 11.52 3.29 2.06 2.06 1.44 1.03 1.03 8.44 1.03

2.72 1.35 0.96 0.85 0.24 0.15 0.15 0.11 0.08 0.08 0.62 0.08 7.39

100

7.39

6,574

15




Kentucky Enteritidis Heidelberg Typhimurium c 8,20:-:z6 c I 4,[5],12:i:Montevideo Schwarzengrund Senftenberg Worthington a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates



183 96 65 30 11 10 8 6 6 6 36 4 461 1 462

39.61 20.78 14.07 6.49 2.38 2.16 1.73 1.30 1.30 1.30 7.79 0.87 99.78 0.22 100

2.84 1.49 1.01 0.47 0.17 0.16 0.12 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.56 0.06 7.16 0.02 7.18

6,439

16




Kentucky Enteritidis Typhimurium Heidelberg c I 4,[5],12:i:Johannesburg Schwarzengrund Senftenberg Berta Braenderup Thompson a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates



208 124 41 16 10 6 5 5 4 4 4 24 5 456 2 458

45.41 27.07 8.95 3.49 2.18 1.31 1.09 1.09 0.87 0.87 0.87 5.24 1.09 .99 .44 100

3.05 1.82 0.60 0.23 0.15 0.09 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.35 0.07 6.68 0.03 6.71

6,828

17




Kentucky Enteritidis d Typhimurium Infantis Heidelberg Johannesburg c I 4,[5],12:i:c 8,20:-:z6 Mbandaka Berta Braenderup Brandenburg Litchfield Senftenberg Thompson a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates



169 75 21 12 9 5 5 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 7 5 326 0 326

51.84 23.01 6.44 3.68 2.76 1.53 1.53 0.92 0.92 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 2.15 1.53 96.32 0.00 100.00

3.33 1.48 0.41 0.24 0.18 0.10 0.10 0.06 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.14 0.10 6.42 0.00 6.42

5076

18




Kentucky Enteritidis Typhimurium Thompson Infantis Heidelberg c I 4,[5],12:i:Schwarzengrund Montevideo Hadar Mbandaka Other serotypes Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive isolates Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates



228 92 41 21 19 16 14 8 5 4 4 19 0 471 0 471

48.41 19.53 8.70 4.46 4.03 3.40 2.97 1.70 1.06 0.85 0.85 4.03 0.00 100 0 100

2.09 0.84 0.38 0.19 0.17 0.15 0.13 0.07 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.17 0.00 4.31 0.00 4.31

10933

19




Kentucky Enteritidis Typhimurium Infantis Schwarzengrund Heidelberg c I 4,[5],12:i:Thompson Montevideo Newport Muenchen Mbandaka Litchfield a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive isolates Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates



219 58 45 23 21 18 17 13 3 2 2 2 2 10 1 435 0 435

50.34 13.33 10.34 5.29 4.83 4.14 3.91 2.99 0.69 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 2.30 0.23 100 0 100

1.97 0.52 0.40 0.21 0.19 0.16 0.15 0.12 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 .01 3.91 0 3.91

11123

*The percentages listed for total positive isolates may not equal the sum of the data in the Percent of Analyzed Samples column due to rounding. a The ten most commonly isolated serotypes during a listed year are identified by name while less commonly identified serotypes are included in the “other serotypes” category. When there is more than one serotype in tenth place, all serotypes in tenth place are listed. b The “unidentified” designation includes isolates for which a single specific serotype could not be determined including rough, and/or nonmotile. c Prior to 2004, FSIS classified serotypes identified solely by antigenic formulas as monophasic, such as I 4, [5],12:i:-, and included them in the unidentified isolates category. Of note: The figures display the percent of the isolates identified out of total isolates serotyped for each product class. The y axis, the serotype percentage, varies from graph to graph because the percent of different serotypes varies by commodity and year. *******************

20



Table 2 Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. *Market Hogs (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 1998 Derby Typhimurium var. Copenhagen Agona Schwarzengrund Heidelberg London Muenchen Brandenburg Hadar Infantis Typhimurium Worthington a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates 13 10 5 4 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 11 1 63 18 81

Percent of Total Positive 20.63 15.87 7.94 6.35 4.76 4.76 4.76 3.17 3.17 3.17 3.17 3.17 17.46 1.59 .78

Percent of Analyzed Samples 0.94 0.72 0.36 0.29 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.79 0.07 4.53 1.29 5.83

1,390

21



Table 2 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. *Market Hogs (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 1999 Derby Typhimurium var. Copenhagen Heidelberg Anatum Infantis Johannesburg Uganda Agona Manhattan Reading a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed Total positive Total number of analyzed samples


Percent of Total Positive 28.99 7.97 5.80 5.07 5.07 5.07 5.07 3.62 3.62 3.62 23.91


1,923

22



Table 2 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. *Market Hogs (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2000 Derby Typhimurium var. Copenhagen Johannesburg Infantis Heidelberg Anatum Typhimurium Minnesota Brandenburg Manhattan Reading Saintpaul Senftenberg a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates 66 47 24 20 17 10 9 8 7 7 7 7 7 51 5 292 31 323

Percent of Total Positive 22.60 16.10 8.22 6.85 5.82 3.42 3.08 2.74 2.40 2.40 2.40 2.40 2.40 17.47 1.71

Percent of Analyzed Samples 1.28 0.91 0.46 0.39 0.33 0.19 0.17 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.99 0.10 5.65 0.60 6.25

5,170

23



Table 2 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. *Market Hogs (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2001 Derby Infantis Anatum Typhimurium var. Copenhagen Saintpaul Heidelberg Reading Johannesburg Uganda Typhimurium a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed Total positive Total number of analyzed samples




8,090

24



Table 2—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. *Market Hogs (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2002 Derby Typhimurium var. Copenhagen Infantis Saintpaul Anatum Reading Heidelberg Johannesburg Typhimurium Uganda a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates


72 31 14 14 13 8 7 7 7 7 57 0 237 0 237

30.38 13.08 5.91 5.91 5.49 3.38 2.95 2.95 2.95 2.95 24.05


7,479

25



Table 2 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. *Market Hogs (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2003 Derby Typhimurium var. Copenhagen Infantis Heidelberg Saintpaul Anatum Johannesburg Typhimurium Reading Uganda Adelaide Brandenburg a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates


26 16 11 10 8 8 7 6 5 4 4 4 38 4 151 0 151

17.22 10.60 7.28 6.62 5.30 5.30 4.64 3.97 3.31 2.65 2.65 2.65 25.17 2.65


5,924

26



Table 2—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. *Market Hogs (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2004 Derby Typhimurium var. Copenhagen Anatum Infantis Adelaide Johannesburg Reading Mbandaka Muenchen Agona Brandenburg Choleraesuis var. Kunzendorf Hadar Heidelberg Typhimurium a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates


70 42 27 19 10 9 8 6 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 24 3 247 0 247

28.34 17.00 10.93 7.69 4.05 3.64 3.24 2.43 2.02 1.62 1.62 1.62 1.62 1.62 1.62 9.72 1.21

Percent of Analyzed Samples 0.89 0.53 0.34 0.24 0.13 0.11 0.10 0.08 0.06 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.31 0.04 3.14 3.14

7,860

27



Table 2—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. *Market Hogs (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2005 Derby Typhimurium Infantis Anatum Saintpaul Reading Johannesburg London Adelaide Heidelberg a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates


73 33 22 13 11 10 9 9 8 6 50 1 245 1 246

29.80 13.47 8.98 5.31 4.49 4.08 3.67 3.67 3.27 2.45 20.41 0.41


6,648

28



Table 2 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. *Market Hogs (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2006 Derby Anatum Johannesburg Typhimurium Infantis Saintpaul Heidelberg Agona Hadar Manhattan a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed Total positive Total number of analyzed samples




7,242

29



Table 2 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. *Market Hogs (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2007 c

Typhimurium Derby Johannesburg Infantis Anatum Saintpaul Adelaide London Agona Hadar a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates


42 27 20 17 13 13 10 10 8 8 32 3 203 0 203

20.69 13.30 9.85 8.37 6.40 6.40 4.93 4.93 3.94 3.94 15.76 1.48


7,308

30



Table 2 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. *Market Hogs (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2008 Derby Infantis Typhimurium Saintpaul Agona Anatum London Johannesburg Ohio Hadar a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates


23 14 11 7 6 6 6 5 4 3 24 0 109 0 109

21.10 12.84 10.09 6.42 5.50 5.50 5.50 4.59 3.67 2.75 22.02


4,244

31



Table 2 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. *Market Hogs (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2009 Derby c Typhimurium Johannesburg Infantis Anatum Adelaide Agona Bredeney Heidelberg Saintpaul a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates


21 18 10 8 6 5 5 4 4 4 23 0 108 0 108

19.44 16.67 9.26 7.41 5.56 4.63 4.63 3.70 3.70 3.70 21.30


4,747

32



Table 2 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. *Market Hogs (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2010 Derby c Typhimurium Saintpaul Infantis Adelaide Johannesburg London Heidelberg Agona Anatum Cerro Choleraesuis a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates


17 13 11 8 7 7 6 5 4 3 3 3 11 3 101 0 101

16.83 12.87 10.89 7.92 6.93 6.93 5.94 4.95 3.96 2.97 2.97 2.97 10.89 2.97


4,224

33



Table 2 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. **Market Hogs (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2011 Adelaide Johannesburg Derby Infantis Anatum c Typhimurium Ohio Uganda Agona Muenchen a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates


13 12 10 9 9 5 4 3 2 2 13 1 83 0 83

18.84 17.39 14.49 13.04 13.04 7.25 5.80 4.35 2.90 2.90 15.66 1.20 100 0 100


2,468

34



Table 2 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. **Market Hogs (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2012 St. Paul a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive

Number of Isolates


1 0 0 1 0 1

100 0 0 100 0 100

Total number of analyzed samples

Percent of Analyzed Samples 1.28 0 0 1.28 0.00 1.28

78

*The percentages listed for total positive isolates may not equal the sum of the data in the Percent of Analyzed Samples column due to rounding. a The ten most commonly isolated serotypes during a listed year are identified by name while less commonly identified serotypes are included in the “other serotypes” category. When there is more than one serotype in tenth place, all serotypes in tenth place are listed. b The “unidentified” designation includes isolates for which a single specific serotype could not be determined including rough, and/or nonmotile. c Prior to 2004, FSIS classified serotypes identified solely by antigenic formulas as monophasic, such as I 4, [5],12:i:-, and included them in the unidentified isolates category. **Sampling sets scheduling suspended for this product class in 2012. Of note: The figures display the percent of the isolates identified out of total isolates serotyped for each product class. The y axis, the serotype percentage, varies from graph to graph because the percent of different serotypes varies by commodity and year. ***********************

35



Table 3 Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. **Cows/Bulls (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 1998 Derby Muenchen a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive

Number of Isolates 1 1 0 0 2 0 2


Percent of Total Positive 50.00 50.00

Percent of Analyzed Samples 0.56 0.56

1.12 1.12 179

Table 3 Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. **Cows/Bulls (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 1999 Kentucky Muenster Montevideo Typhimurium Typhimurium var. Copenhagen Anatum Berta Derby Give Litchfield London Mbandaka Meleagridis Newport a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates


Percent of Total Positive 14.29 14.29 10.71 10.71 7.14 3.57 3.57 3.57 3.57 3.57 3.57 3.57 3.57 3.57


10.71

0.20 1.84

36

United States Department of Agriculture Serotypes 1999 Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Food Safety And Inspection Service Number of Isolates 5 33



1,521

37



Table 3—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. **Cows/Bulls (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2000 Newport Muenster Montevideo Typhimurium Kentucky Meleagridis Typhimurium var. Copenhagen Albany Cerro Derby Dublin Fresno Infantis London Mbandaka Muenchen Reading Schwarzengrund a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates 6 5 4 4 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 40 3 43

Percent of Total Positive 15.00 12.50 10.00 10.00 7.50 7.50 7.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50


2.50

0.05 2.01 0.15 2.16

1,995

38



Table 3—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. **Cows/Bulls (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2001 Montevideo Anatum Kentucky Typhimurium Dublin Newport Albany Heidelberg Mbandaka Meleagridis Newbrunswick (Give var. 15+) Reading Typhimurium var. Copenhagen a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples




2,176

39



Table 3—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. **Cows/Bulls (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples Serotypes 2002 Number Percent of Total Percent of of Isolates Positive Analyzed Samples Newport 18 24.66 0.41 Muenster 8 10.96 0.18 Agona 5 6.85 0.11 Kentucky 5 6.85 0.11 Typhimurium 5 6.85 0.11 Infantis 4 5.48 0.09 Montevideo 4 5.48 0.09 Derby 3 4.11 0.07 Mbandaka 3 4.11 0.07 Reading 3 4.11 0.07 a Other serotypes 14 19.18 0.32 b Unidentified isolates 1 1.37 0.02 Total serotyped isolates 73 1.65 Not typed 0 *Total positive 73 1.65 Total number of analyzed samples

4,414

40



Table 3—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. **Cows/Bulls (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2003 Muenster Newport Typhimurium var. Copenhagen Typhimurium Cerro Agona Derby Give Meleagridis Anatum Cubana Havana Infantis Montevideo Newbrunswick Soerenga a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates 7 5 5 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 6 0 38 0 38

Percent of Total Positive 18.42 13.16 13.16 7.89 7.89 5.26 5.26 5.26 5.26 2.63 2.63 2.63 2.63 2.63 2.63 2.63 15.79


2,599

41



Table 3—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. **Cows/Bulls (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2004 Cerro Derby Dublin Muenster Newport Typhimurium Agona Anatum Brandenburg Infantis Johannesburg Livingston London Meleagridis Montevideo Muenchen Typhimurium var. Copenhagen a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates


2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 24 0 24

8.33 8.33 8.33 8.33 8.33 8.33 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.17 4.17

Percent of Analyzed Samples 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.76 0.76

3,175

42



Table 3—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. **Cows/Bulls (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2005 Montevideo Typhimurium Agona Anatum Cerro Infantis Kentucky Muenster Bareilly Bovismorbificans Derby Dublin Hadar Meleagridis Newport Panama a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates


3 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 26 0 26

11.54 11.54 7.69 7.69 7.69 7.69 7.69 7.69 3.85 3.85 3.85 3.85 3.85 3.85 3.85 3.85


1.33 1.33 1,949

.

43



Table 3 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. **Cows/Bulls (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2006 Kentucky Montevideo Agona Muenster Cerro Dublin Enteritidis Heidelberg Mbandaka Meleagridis Muenchen Newport a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples



Percent of Analyzed Samples 0.18 0.13 0.09 0.09 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04

0.85 0.85 2,246

44



Table 3 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. **Cows/Bulls (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2007 Anatum Newport Cerro Montevideo Muenster Infantis Typhimurium c 3.10:e,h:c 6,7:z10:Enteritidis Gaminara Kentucky Mbandaka Meleagridis Miami Muenchen Saintpaul a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates 7 7 5 4 4 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 42 0 42

Percent of Total Positive 16.67 16.67 11.90 9.52 9.52 4.76 4.76 2.38 2.38 2.38 2.38 2.38 2.38 2.38 2.38 2.38 2.38


2.38

0.03 1.07 1.07

3,918

45



Table 3 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. **Cows/Bulls (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2008 Agona Cerro Montevideo Anatum var. 15+ Hadar Kentucky London Muenster Newport a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive

Number of Isolates 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 12 0 12


Percent of Total Positive 16.67 16.67 16.67 8.33 8.33 8.33 8.33 8.33 8.33

Percent of Analyzed Samples 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04

0.52 0.52 2,301

Table 3 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. **Cows/Bulls (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2009 Montevideo Give Newport c 6,7:k:Agona Kentucky Mbandaka Uganda a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates

Number of Isolates 3 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 12

Percent of Total Positive 25.00 16.67 16.67 8.33 8.33 8.33 8.33 8.33

Percent of Analyzed Samples 0.15 0.10 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05

0.59

46

United States Department of Agriculture Serotypes 2009 Not typed *Total positive

Food Safety And Inspection Service Number of Isolates 0 12



Percent of Analyzed Samples 0.59

2,036

Table 3 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. **Cows/Bulls (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2010 Montevideo Bredeney Hadar Meleagridis Senftenberg Typhimurium 5a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples


Percent of Total Positive 44.44 11.11 11.11 11.11 11.11 11.11

Percent of Analyzed Samples 0.23 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06

0.51 0.51 1,764

47



Table 3 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. **Cows/Bulls (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2011 Meleagridis Anatum Var. 15+ Kentucky Montevideo Norwich a

Other serotypes Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive b

Number of Isolates 3 1 1 1 1

Percent of Total Positive 42.86 14.29 14.29 14.29 14.29

Percent of Analyzed Samples 0.34 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11

0 0 7 0 7

0 0 100 0 100

0.00 0.00 0.79 0.00 0.79

Total number of analyzed samples 882 *The percentages listed for total positive isolates may not equal the sum of the data in the Percent of Analyzed Samples column due to rounding. a The ten most commonly isolated serotypes during a listed year are identified by name while less commonly identified serotypes are included in the “other serotypes” category. When there is more than one serotype in tenth place, all serotypes in tenth place are listed. b The “unidentified” designation includes isolates for which a single specific serotype could not be determined including rough, and/or nonmotile. c Prior to 2004, FSIS classified serotypes identified solely by antigenic formulas as monophasic, such as I 4, [5],12:i:-, and included them in the unidentified isolates category. **Sample sets scheduling suspended for this product class in 2011. Of note: The figures display the percent of the isolates identified out of total isolates serotyped for each product class. The y axis, the serotype percentage, varies from graph to graph because the percent of different serotypes varies by commodity and year. ********************

48



Table 4 Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. **Steers/Heifers (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 1998

*Total positive

Number of Isolates


0



214

Table 4—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. **Steers/Heifers (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 1999 Heidelberg Panama a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates 1 1 0 0 2 0 2

Percent of Total Positive 50.00 50.00


0.26 0.26 782

49



Table 4—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. **Steers/Heifers (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2000

Number of Isolates 2 1 1 0 0 4 0 4

Montevideo Minnesota Typhimurium var. Copenhagen a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive

Percent of Total Positive 50.00 25.00 25.00

Percent of Analyzed Samples 0.18 0.09 0.09

0.37 0.37


1,092

Table 4—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. **Steers/Heifers (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2001 Derby Dublin Cerro Heidelberg Kentucky Montevideo Saintpaul a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates


4 2 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 11 0 11

36.36 18.18 9.09 9.09 9.09 9.09 9.09

Percent of Analyzed Samples 0.24 0.12 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06

0.65 0.65 1,695

50



Table 4—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. **Steers/Heifers (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2002 Reading Agona Kentucky Braenderup Derby Heidelberg Montevideo Muenster Sandiego a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates


3 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 14 0 14

21.43 14.29 14.29 7.14 7.14 7.14 7.14 7.14 7.14 7.14


4,572

51



Table 4—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. **Steers/Heifers (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2003 Derby Kentucky Montevideo Anatum Oranienburg Heidelberg Bovismorbificans Dublin Mbandaka Muenchen Newport Ohio Uganda a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed Total positive Total number of analyzed samples




0.42 0.42 4,480

52



Table 4—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. **Steers/Heifers (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2004 Derby c 6,8:-:1,2 Anatum Dublin Indiana Infantis Newport Senftenberg Typhimurium a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates


4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 12 0 12

33.33 8.33 8.33 8.33 8.33 8.33 8.33 8.33 8.33


0.28 0.28 4,227

53



Table 4—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. **Steers/Heifers (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2005 Dublin Muenchen Paratyphi B var. L-tartrate+ Poona Gaminara Havana Muenster Newport a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates


2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 12 0 12

16.67 16.67 16.67 16.67 8.33 8.33 8.33 8.33


0.57 0.57 2,090

54



Table 4—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. **Steers/Heifers (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2006 Newport Adelaide Anatum var. 15+,34+ Bere Montevideo Muenster Reading Saintpaul Typhimurium a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed Total positive





0.27 0.27 3,674

Table 4 Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. **Steers/Heifers (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2007 Dublin Anatum Give var. 15+ Infantis Kentucky Montevideo Newport a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed Total positive

Number of Isolates 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 9 0 9


Percent of Analyzed Samples 0.05 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.20 0.20

55

United States Department of Agriculture Serotypes 2007

Food Safety And Inspection Service Number of Isolates




4,406

Table 4 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. **Steers/Heifers (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2008 Dublin Typhimurium Anatum Mbandaka Montevideo Newport a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed Total positive





22.22 22.22 11.11 11.11 11.11 11.11

0.04 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02

11.11

0.02 0.18 0.18 4,965

Table 4—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. **Steers/Heifers (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2009 Bareilly Give c III_61:-:1,5,7 Montevideo Muenchen Muenster Poona Typhimurium


Percent of Total Positive 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00


56

United States Department of Agriculture Serotypes 2009 a

Other serotypes Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed Total positive b

Food Safety And Inspection Service Number of Isolates 0 2 10 0 10




20.00

0.04 0.20 0.20

4,939

Table 4—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. **Steers/Heifers (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2010 Anatum Adelaide Derby Montevideo a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates 3 1 1 1 0 0 6 0 6

Percent of Total Positive 50.00 16.67 16.67 16.67

Percent of Analyzed Samples 0.06 0.02 0.02 0.02

0.12 0.12 4,918

57



Table 4—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. **Steers/Heifers (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2011 Agona Infantis Uganda_var._15+ Anatum Dublin Kiambu Minnesota Muenster Newport a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed Total positive Total number of analyzed samples


Percent of Total Positive 16.67 16.67 16.67 8.33 8.33 8.33 8.33 8.33 8.33 0.00 7.69 100 0 100


2,893

58



Table 4 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. **Steers/Heifers (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2012 c

4,[5],12:i:Hadar Dublin a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed Total positive Total number of analyzed samples


Percent of Total Positive 33.33 33.33 33.33 0.00 0 100 0 100


269

*The percentages listed for total positive isolates may not equal the sum of the data in the Percent of Analyzed Samples column due to rounding. a

The ten most commonly isolated serotypes during a listed year are identified by name while less commonly identified serotypes are included in the “other serotypes” category. When there is more than one serotype in tenth place, all serotypes in tenth place are listed. b The “unidentified” designation includes isolates for which a single specific serotype could not be determined including rough, and/or nonmotile. c Prior to 2004, FSIS classified serotypes identified solely by antigenic formulas as monophasic, such as I 4, [5],12:i:-, and included them in the unidentified isolates category. **Sample sets scheduling suspended for this product class in 2012. Of note: The figures display the percent of the isolates identified out of total isolates serotyped for each product class. The y axis, the serotype percentage, varies from graph to graph because the percent of different serotypes varies by commodity and year. ********************

59



Table 5 Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Beef (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 1998 Anatum Montevideo Meleagridis Muenster Hadar Typhimurium var. Copenhagen Infantis Kentucky Newport Reading a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples




1,296

60



Table 5-Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Beef (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 1999 Montevideo Anatum Muenster Typhimurium Cerro Kentucky Mbandaka Typhimurium var. Copenhagen Meleagridis Newport a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples




16,375

61



Table 5—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Beef (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2000 Montevideo Senftenberg Newport Typhimurium var. Copenhagen Anatum Typhimurium Cerro Muenster Mbandaka Kentucky a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples




32,844

62



Table 5-Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Beef (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2001 Montevideo Newport Anatum Muenster Kentucky Typhimurium Mbandaka Cerro Typhimurium var. Copenhagen Reading a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples




24,243

63



Table 5—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Beef (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2002 Montevideo Newport Anatum Muenster Agona Typhimurium var. Copenhagen Kentucky Mbandaka Typhimurium Cerro a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive





30,933

Table 5—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Beef (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2003 Newport Montevideo Anatum Agona Typhimurium var. Copenhagen Typhimurium Dublin Muenster Kentucky Mbandaka a Other serotypes



Percent of Analyzed Samples 0.19 0.17 0.15 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.53

64

United States Department of Agriculture Serotypes 2003 b

Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive

Food Safety And Inspection Service Number of Isolates 10 490 0 490


Percent of Total Positive 2.04

Percent of Analyzed Samples 0.03 1.68 1.68

29,097

Table 5—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Beef (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2004 Montevideo Anatum Muenster Newport Agona Dublin Kentucky Typhimurium Typhimurium var. Copenhagen Mbandaka a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples




30,984

65



Table 5—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Beef (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2005 Montevideo Typhimurium Anatum Muenster Newport Mbandaka Dublin Reading Cerro Agona Give Meleagridis a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples


Percent of Total Positive 13.89 9.26 9.26 7.87 6.48 5.56 4.17 4.17 3.70 3.24 3.24 3.24 24.54 1.39


19,365

66



Table 5—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Beef (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2006 Montevideo Muenster Anatum Newport Cerro Typhimurium Dublin Reading Mbandaka Infantis a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples




16.86 9.71 7.71 6.86 6.29 6.00 5.14 5.14 4.00 3.71 28.29 0.29

0.33 0.19 0.15 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.10 0.10 0.08 0.07 0.55 0.01 1.96 1.96 17,849

67



Table 5 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Beef (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2007 Montevideo Dublin Muenster Mbandaka Newport Typhimurium Cerro Meleagridis Agona Anatum Infantis Kentucky a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples




23.43 9.81 7.63 6.27 5.99 5.18 4.90 4.36 4.09 3.81 2.72 2.72 17.71 1.36

0.63 0.26 0.20 0.17 0.16 0.14 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.10 0.07 0.07 0.47 0.04 2.68 2.68

13,695

68



Table 5—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Beef (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2008 Montevideo Dublin Anatum Newport Typhimurium Cerro Kentucky Mbandaka Meleagridis Muenster a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples




16,765

69



Table 5 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Beef (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2009 Montevideo Dublin Newport Typhimurium Cerro Kentucky Meleagridis Anatum Muenchen a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples




8,541

70



Table 5 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Beef (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2010 Montevideo Dublin Typhimurium Anatum Cerro Kentucky Agona Mbandaka Meleagridis Newport a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples




9,257

71



Table 5 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Beef (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2011 Montevideo Dublin Muenster Kentucky Anatum Cerro Infantis Newport Meleagridis Typhimurium a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples


Percent of Total Positive 39.60 14.00 8.80 6.80 6.40 5.60 5.60 4.80 4.40 4.00 22.02 1.53 100 0 100

Percent of Analyzed Samples 0.71 0.25 0.16 0.12 0.12 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.07 0.52 0.04 2.36 0 2.36

13,884

72



Table 5 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Beef (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2012 Montevideo Dublin Typhimurium Anatum Muenchen Cerro Meleagridis Kentucky Muenster Newport a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples


Percent of Total Positive 39.71 14.22 7.84 7.35 6.37 6.37 5.88 5.88 3.43 2.94 23.81 1.47 100 0 100


14,665

73



Table 5 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Beef (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2013 Montevideo Typhimurium Meleagridis Dublin Newport Muenchen Kentucky Cerro Anatum 6,7:G,M,S:E,N,Z15 Infantis Reading Panama Give Mbandaka c I 4,[5],12:i:Agona Muenster a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive

Number of Isolates 86 19 18 18 13 12 12 11 9 7 7 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 32 2 277 0 277

Percent of Total Positive 31.05 6.86 6.50 6.50 4.69 4.33 4.33 3.97 3.25 2.53 2.53 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.81 1.44 1.44 11.55 0.72 100 0 100

Percent of Analyzed Samples 0.50 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.10 0.01 .88 0.00 .88

Total number of analyzed samples 17,161 *The percentages listed for total positive isolates may not equal the sum of the data in the Percent of Analyzed Samples column due to rounding. a The ten most commonly isolated serotypes during a listed year are identified by name while less commonly identified serotypes are included in the “other serotypes” category. When there is more than one serotype in tenth place, all serotypes in tenth place are listed. b The “unidentified” designation includes isolates for which a single specific serotype could not be determined including rough, and/or nonmotile. c Prior to 2004, FSIS classified serotypes identified solely by antigenic formulas as monophasic, such as I 4, [5],12:i:-, and included them in the unidentified isolates category. Of note: The figures display the percent of the isolates identified out of total isolates serotyped for each product class. The y axis, the serotype percentage, varies from graph to graph because the percent of different serotypes varies by commodity and year.

74



********************** Table 6 Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Chicken (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 1998 Thompson a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive

Number of Isolates 1 0 0 1 0 1


Percent of Total Positive 100.00

Percent of Analyzed Samples 4.17

4.17 4.17 24

Table 6—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Chicken (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 1999 Hadar Heidelberg Typhimurium var. Copenhagen Typhimurium Istanbul Reading Enteritidis Infantis Litchfield Newington Schwarzengrund Thompson a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates




9.09

1.35 14.81

75



Serotypes 1999

Number of Isolates 4 48

Not typed *Total positive




297

Table 6—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Chicken (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2000 Kentucky Heidelberg Typhimurium var. Copenhagen Hadar Typhimurium Infantis Newport Thompson Berta Enteritidis Reading Schwarzengrund a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples




10.20

1.21 11.84 1.93 13.77

414

76



Table 6—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Chicken (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2001 Heidelberg Schwarzengrund Kentucky Typhimurium Hadar Thompson Brandenburg Johannesburg Ohio Typhimurium var. Copenhagen a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples


Percent of Total Positive 26.00 20.00 18.00 10.00 4.00 4.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00

Percent of Analyzed Samples 4.96 3.82 3.44 1.91 0.76 0.76 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38

10.00

1.91 19.08 0.38 19.47

262

77



Table 6—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Chicken (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2002 Heidelberg Kentucky Typhimurium var. Copenhagen Typhimurium Enteritidis Montevideo Hadar Schwarzengrund Infantis Thompson a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples




429

78



Table 6—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Chicken (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2003 Hadar Heidelberg Kentucky Thompson Infantis Montevideo Istanbul Haardt Oranienburg Typhimurium var. Copenhagen Typhimurium Arizona Bredeney Mbandaka Taksony a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates 29 27 21 6 4 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 4 105 0 105



3.81

1.35 35.47 35.47

296

79



Table 6—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Chicken (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2004 Kentucky Enteritidis Typhimurium Heidelberg Montevideo Schwarzengrund Thompson c I4,[5],12:i:Infantis c 6,7:k:Agona Braenderup Hadar Havana Mbandaka Oranienburg Senftenberg Typhimurium var. Copenhagen Uganda a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates 50 7 7 6 5 5 4 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 99 0 99

Percent of Total Positive 50.51 7.07 7.07 6.06 5.05 5.05 4.04 1.01 2.02 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01 1.01


25.52 25.52 388

80



Table 6—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Chicken (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2005 Enteritidis Kentucky Heidelberg Typhimurium c 4,[5],12:i:Alachua Hadar Kiambu Muenster Schwarzengrund Senftenberg Thompson a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples




32.41 32.41 145

.

81



Table 6 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Chicken (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2006 Kentucky Heidelberg Enteritidis c 4,[5],12:i:Typhimurium Berta Infantis Schwarzengrund c 8,(20):z6 Anatum Hadar Mbandaka Montevideo Thompson a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates 42 16 16 4 4 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 100 0 100



42.00 16.00 16.00 4.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 3.00

18.92 7.21 7.21 1.80 1.80 1.35 1.35 1.35 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.90 1.35 45.05 45.05 222

82



Table 6—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Chicken (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2007 Enteritidis Kentucky Heidelberg c 4,[5],12:i:Typhimurium Infantis Thompson Minnesota Schwarzengrund a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples




25.56 24.81 20.30 6.76 6.02 2.26 2.26 1.50 1.50 7.52 1.50

6.72 6.52 5.34 1.77 1.58 0.59 0.59 0.40 0.40 1.98 0.40 26.28 26.28 506

83



Table 6 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Chicken (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2008 Kentucky Heidelberg Enteritidis Typhimurium c 4,5,12:i:Infantis Montevideo c 6,7:-:1,5 c 8,20:-:z6 Berta Blockley Braenderup Hartford Kralingen Oranienburg a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples




28.57 24.76 20.00 11.43 3.08 1.90 1.90 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95

7.28 6.31 5.10 2.91 0.97 0.49 0.49 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24

25.49 25.49 412

84



Table 6 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Chicken (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2009 Kentucky Enteritidis Heidelberg d Typhimurium c 4,[5],12:i:c 8,20:-:z6 Braenderup Blockley Cerro Infantis Montevideo Schwarzengrund a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples




30.88 29.41 10.29 7.35 7.35 2.94 2.94 1.47 1.47 1.47 1.47 1.47

5.61 5.35 1.87 1.34 1.34 0.53 0.53 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27

18.18 18.18 374

85



Table 6 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Chicken (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2010 Kentucky Enteritidis Heidelberg d Typhimurium c 4,5,12:i:Berta c 8,20:-:z6 Hadar Infantis Montevideo Newport Ohio Thompson a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples




35.00 30.00 10.00 7.50 6.25 2.50 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25

6.57 5.63 1.88 1.41 1.17 0.47 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23

18.78 18.78 426

86



Table 6 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Chicken (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2011 Enteritidis Kentucky Heidelberg Typhimurium Braenderup Infantis Mbandaka c 8,20:-:z6 c 3,10:e,h:c 4, [5],12:I:C 8,20:I:Johannesburg Lille Newport Roodepoort a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples




36.54 30.77 11.54 6.41 3.21 2.56 2.56 1.28 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64

10.84 9.13 3.42 1.90 0.95 0.76 0.76 0.38 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19

1.27 100

0.38 30.04

100

30.04 526

87



Table 6 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Chicken (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2012 Enteritidis Kentucky Typhimurium Heidelberg Schwarzengrund Infantis Thompson c 4,[5],12:i:Montevideo Mbandaka a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates 111 70 64 62 18 12 9 9 4 4 22 2 387



30.58 19.28 17.63 17.08 4.96 3.31 2.48 2.48 1.10 1.10 5.68 0.52 100

8.07 5.09 4.65 4.51 1.31 0.87 0.65 0.65 0.29 0.29 1.60 0.15 28.13

387

100

28.13 1,376

88



Table 6 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Chicken (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2013 Enteritidis Kentucky Infantis Heidelberg Typhimurium C I 4,[5],12:i:Braenderup Blockley Uganda Liverpool Thompson a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive

Number of Isolates 22 17 13 10 8 4 2 1 1 1 1 1



27.16 20.99 16.05 12.35 9.88 4.94 2.47 1.23 1.23 1.23 1.23 1.23

0.07 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.22

81

100

17.88

81

100

17.88


453

*The percentages listed for total positive isolates may not equal the sum of the data in the Percent of Analyzed Samples column due to rounding. a

The ten most commonly isolated serotypes during a listed year are identified by name while less commonly identified serotypes are included in the “other serotypes” category. When there is more than one serotype in tenth place, all serotypes in tenth place are listed. b The “unidentified” designation includes isolates for which a single specific serotype could not be determined including rough, and/or nonmotile. c Prior to 2004, FSIS classified serotypes identified solely by antigenic formulas as monophasic, such as I 4, [5],12:i:-, and included them in the unidentified isolates category. Of note: The figures display the percent of the isolates identified out of total isolates serotyped for each product class. The y axis, the serotype percentage, varies from graph to graph because the percent of different serotypes varies by commodity and year. **********************

89



Table 7 Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Turkey (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 1998 Hadar Heidelberg Senftenberg Reading Schwarzengrund Muenster Saintpaul Anatum Kentucky Typhimurium a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples




591

90



Table 7-Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Turkey (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 1999 Hadar Heidelberg Senftenberg Reading Muenster Agona Saintpaul Schwarzengrund Typhimurium var. Copenhagen Typhimurium a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples




1,050

91



Table 7—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Turkey (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2000 Heidelberg Hadar Agona Senftenberg Schwarzengrund Reading Saintpaul Muenster Brandenburg Arizona Muenchen a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples




1,551

92



Table 7 Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Turkey (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2001 Heidelberg Senftenberg Hadar Arizona Reading Agona Newport Saintpaul Schwarzengrund Derby Typhimurium Worthington a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates


33 18 14 10 10 8 7 5 4 3 3 3 15 0 133 3 136

24.81 13.53 10.53 7.52 7.52 6.02 5.26 3.76 3.01 2.26 2.26 2.26 11.28


520

93



Table 7—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Turkey (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2002 Heidelberg Reading Hadar Saintpaul Senftenberg Arizona Newport Schwarzengrund Uganda Typhimurium a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates


37 24 23 14 14 10 10 9 8 5 30 8 192 0 192

19.27 12.50 11.98 7.29 7.29 5.21 5.21 4.69 4.17 2.60 15.63 4.17


1,075

94



Table 7 Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Turkey (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2003 Heidelberg Hadar Arizona Reading Saintpaul Newport Senftenberg Kentucky Schwarzengrund Typhimurium a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates


55 44 31 28 19 18 11 9 6 5 24 5 255 0 255

21.57 17.25 12.16 10.98 7.45 7.06 4.31 3.53 2.35 1.96 9.41 1.96


1,004

95



Table 7—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Turkey (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2004 Heidelberg Hadar Reading Derby Saintpaul Senftenberg c IIIa 18:z4,z23:Typhimurium Schwarzengrund Kentucky Newport a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates


38 27 16 15 15 10 9 9 8 6 6 47 2 208 0 208

18.27 12.98 7.69 7.21 7.21 4.81 4.33 4.33 3.85 2.88 2.88 22.60 0.96


1,044

96



Table 7—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Turkey (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2005 Hadar Saintpaul Heidelberg Reading Schwarzengrund c IIIa 18:z4,z23:Senftenberg Agona Albany Kentucky Muenchen Newport a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates


44 27 25 18 12 11 8 7 6 5 5 5 40 2 215 0 215

20.47 12.56 11.63 8.37 5.58 5.12 3.72 3.26 2.79 2.33 2.33 2.33 18.60 0.93


925

97



Table 7—Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Turkey (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2005 (Variants Combined)d Hadar Saintpaul Heidelberg Reading Schwarzengrund c IIIa 18:z4,z23:Senftenberg Agona Albany Typhimurium a Other serotypes b Unidentified isolates Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates


44 27 25 18 12 11 8 7 6 6 40 2 215 0 215

20.47 12.56 11.63 8.37 5.58 5.12 3.72 3.26 2.79 2.79 18.60 0.93


925

.

98



Table 7 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Turkey (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2006 Hadar Saintpaul Heidelberg Agona Anatum Kentucky Muenchen Derby Senftenberg Typhimurium Worthington a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates



31 8 7 5 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 14 1 90 0 90

34.44 8.89 7.78 5.56 4.44 4.44 4.44 3.33 3.33 3.33 3.33 15.56 1.11

6.98 1.80 1.58 1.13 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 3.15 0.23 20.27 20.27

444

99



Table 7 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Turkey (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2007 Hadar Heidelberg Saintpaul Agona Newport Reading Anatum London Minnesota Muenchen Schwarzengrund Typhimurium Uganda a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates



62 17 13 11 8 6 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 12 0 143 0 143

43.36 11.89 9.09 7.69 5.59 4.20 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.40 8.39

7.56 2.07 1.59 1.34 0.98 0.73 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 1.46 17.44 17.44

820

100



Table 7 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Turkey (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2008 Hadar Saintpaul c III 18:z4,z23:Schwarzengrund Newport Heidelberg Senftenberg Agona Muenchen Worthington a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates



35 15 14 8 7 6 6 5 5 5 28 1 135 0 135

25.93 11.11 10.37 5.93 5.19 4.44 4.44 3.70 3.70 3.70 20.74 0.74

4.00 1.71 1.60 0.91 0.80 0.68 0.68 0.57 0.57 0.57 3.20 0.11 15.41 15.41

876

101



Table 7 Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Turkey (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2009 Saintpaul Hadar Agona Schwarzengrund Senftenberg Albany c III 18:z4,z23:Derby Heidelberg Newport a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates



17 14 5 5 5 3 3 2 2 2 6 1 65 0 65

26.15 21.54 7.69 7.69 7.69 4.62 4.62 3.08 3.08 3.08 9.23 1.54

2.80 2.30 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.49 0.49 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.99 0.16 10.69 10.69

608

102



Table 7 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Turkey (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2010 Hadar Saintpaul Heidelberg c III 18:z4,z23:Albany Schwarzengrund Senftenberg Anatum Newport Montevideo Reading Typhimurium a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates



15 15 9 9 8 6 6 4 3 2 2 2 8 0 89 0 89

16.85 16.85 10.11 7.89 8.99 6.74 6.74 4.49 3.37 2.25 2.25 2.25 8.99

1.72 1.72 1.03 0.80 0.92 0.69 0.69 0.46 0.34 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.92 10.19 10.19

873

103



Table 7 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Turkey (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2011 c

III 18:z4,z23:Hadar Muenchen Schwarzengrund Heidelberg Newport Reading Saintpaul Berta Kentucky Worthington a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates



13 9 9 7 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 10 0 66 0 66

23.21 16.1 16.1 12.5 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 3.6 3.6 3.6 15.15 0 100 0 100

2.4 1.7 1.7 1.3 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.4 1.86 0 12.24 0 12.24

539

104



Table 7 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Turkey (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2012 III_18:z4,z23:Hadar Muenchen Schwarzengrund Heidelberg Newport Reading Saintpaul Berta Kentucky Worthington a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates



13 9 9 7 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 10 0 66 0 66

23.21 16.1 16.1 12.5 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 3.6 3.6 3.6 15.15 0 100.0 0 100

1.1 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.87 0.00 5.71 0.00 5.71

1,155

105



Table 7 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Ground Turkey (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2013 Muenchen c I 4,[5],12:I:Newport Reading Berta Albany Senftenberg Agona Hadar Iii_18:Z4,Z23:Typhimurium Schwarzengrund Saintpaul Ohio Derby Ouakam Heidelberg Dublin a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive

Number of Isolates



3 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 33 0 33

9.09 9.1 9.1 9.1 9.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0 0 100 0 100

1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0 0 15.21 0.00 15.21

Total number of analyzed samples 217 *The percentages listed for total positive isolates may not equal the sum of the data in the Percent of Analyzed Samples column due to rounding. a The ten most commonly isolated serotypes during a listed year are identified by name while less commonly identified serotypes are included in the “other serotypes” category. When there is more than one serotype in tenth place, all serotypes in tenth place are listed. b The “unidentified” designation includes isolates for which a single specific serotype could not be determined including rough, and/or nonmotile. c Prior to 2004, FSIS classified serotypes identified solely by antigenic formulas as monophasic, such as I 4, [5],12:i:-, and included them in the unidentified isolates category.

106



Of note: The figures display the percent of the isolates identified out of total isolates serotyped for each product class. The y axis, the serotype percentage, varies from graph to graph because the percent of different serotypes varies by commodity and year. **********************

Table 8 Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Young Turkeys (Turkey Carcasses) (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2006 Hadar Heidelberg Reading Schwarzengrund Saintpaul Agona Senftenberg Anatum Derby Muenster a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed Total positive Total number of analyzed samples




32.83 16.67 6.57 6.57 5.05 4.04 4.04 2.53 2.02 2.02 15.66 2.02

2.33 1.18 0.47 0.47 0.36 0.29 0.29 0.18 0.14 0.14 1.11 0.14 7.11 7.11 2,785

107



Table 8-Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Young Turkeys (Turkey Carcasses) (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2007 Hadar Senftenberg Saintpaul Heidelberg Newport Agona Berta Montevideo Mbandaka Muenchen Reading Schwarzengrund Typhimurium a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed Total positive Total number of analyzed samples




50.00 8.33 7.41 5.56 4.63 2.78 2.78 2.78 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 5.56 0.93

3.10 0.52 0.46 0.34 0.29 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.34 0.06 6.19 6.19 1,744

108



Table 8 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Young Turkeys (Turkey Carcasses) (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2008 Hadar Agona Berta Newport Schwarzengrund a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates 3 1 1 1 1 0 1 8 0 8



37.50 12.50 12.50 12.50 12.50

2.33 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78

12.50

0.78 6.20 6.20 129

109



Table 8 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Young Turkeys (Turkey Carcasses) (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2009 Hadar Agona Albany Muenchen Senftenberg Derby Heidelberg Kentucky Typhimurium c 4, [5],12:I:c 8,20:-:z6 Anatum Infantis Johannesburg Mbandaka Montevideo Newport Saintpaul Schwarzengrund a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed Total positive Total number of analyzed samples

Number of Isolates 18 9 3 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 54 0 54



33.33 16.67 5.56 5.56 5.56 3.70 3.70 3.70 3.70 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85 1.85

1.25 0.63 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07

3.77 3.77 1,432

110



Table 8 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Young Turkeys (Turkey Carcasses) (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2010 Hadar Muenchen Saintpaul Heidelberg Schwarzengrund Agona Brandenburg Anatum Berta Newport Typhimurium var. 5a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples




22.73 13.64 9.09 7.58 7.58 6.06 4.55 3.03 3.03 3.03 3.03 13.64 1.52

1.04 0.62 0.42 0.35 0.35 0.28 0.21 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.62 0.07 4.50 0.07 4.57 1,444

111



Table 8 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Young Turkeys (Turkey Carcasses) (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2011 Hadar Albany Berta Saintpaul Schwarzengrund Agona Heidelberg Montevideo c 4, [5],12:I:Brandenburg Cubana Dublin Newport Orion var.15+ Reading Typhimurium Uganda a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples




27.03 8.11 8.11 8.11 8.11 5.41 5.41 5.41 2.70 2.70 2.70 2.70 2.70 2.70 2.70 2.70 2.70 0 0 100 0 100

0.62 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0 0 2.31 0 2.31 1,605

112



Table 8 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Turkeys (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2012 All Samples) Serotypes 2012 Heidelberg Senftenberg Reading Albany Hadar Agona Saintpaul Schwarzengrund Muenchen Montevideo Havana Typhimurium Enteritidis Anatum Ouakam Litchfield Heidelberg a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive Total number of analyzed samples




27.03 8.11 8.11 8.11 8.11 5.41 5.41 5.41 2.70 2.70 2.70 2.70 2.70 2.70 2.70 2.70 2.70 0 0 100 0 100

0.41 0.27 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.09 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.41 0 0 2.20 0 2.20 2,183

113



Table 8 - Continued Profile of Serotypes from Analyzed PR/HACCP Verification Samples by Calendar Year. Young Turkeys (Turkey Carcasses) (1998–2005 'A' Set Samples; 2006–2013 All Samples) Serotypes 2013 Hadar Reading Muenchen Heidelberg Typhimurium Worthington Berta c 4,[5],12:i:Albany Senftenberg Enteritidis Anatum Saintpaul Schwarzengrund Derby Agona Newport a Other serotypes b Unidentified Total serotyped isolates Not typed *Total positive




18.18 12.73 9.09 9.09 7.27 5.45 5.45 5.45 5.45 3.64 3.64 3.64 3.64 1.82 1.82 1.82 1.82 0 0 100 0 100

0.41 0.29 0.21 0.21 0.17 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0 0 2.28 0 2.28

Total number of analyzed samples 453 **Note: Sampling for young turkey began in 2006. *The percentages listed for total positive isolates may not equal the sum of the data in the Percent of Analyzed Samples column due to rounding. a The ten most commonly isolated serotypes during a listed year are identified by name while less commonly identified serotypes are included in the “other serotypes” category. When there is more than one serotype in tenth place, all serotypes in tenth place are listed. b The “unidentified” designation includes isolates for which a single specific serotype could not be determined including rough, and/or nonmotile. c Prior to 2004, FSIS classified serotypes identified solely by antigenic formulas as monophasic, such as I 4, [5],12:i:-, and included them in the unidentified isolates category.

114



Of note: The figures display the percent of the isolates identified out of total isolates serotyped for each product class. The y axis, the serotype percentage, varies from graph to graph because the percent of different serotypes varies by commodity and year. ********************** Figure 1 Top Three Salmonella Serotypes for Each Product Class PR/HACCP Verification Sampling

115



116



117



Figure 2 Serotype Profiles in FSIS Product Classes for Top 10 Serotypes Identified by CDC as Causing Human Infections in 2013 – USDA, FSIS, PR/HACCP Verification Sampling by Calendar Year*(1998–2005 “A” Set Samples; 2006–2013 - All Samples)

118



turkey started in 2005

119



120



121



122



123



124



125



126