Skeletal Muscle Atrophy and the E3 Ubiquitin Ligases, MuRF1 and ...

1 downloads 0 Views 1MB Size Report
Aug 5, 2014 - Running Head: E3 Ubiquitin Ligases and Sparing of Muscle Mass. 11 ... over ten years ago as two muscle specific E3 ubiquitin ligases that are ...
Articles in PresS. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab (August 5, 2014). doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00204.2014

1 2 3 4 5 6

Skeletal Muscle Atrophy and the E3 Ubiquitin Ligases, MuRF1 and MAFbx/Atrogin-1

7

and Physiology and Membrane Biology2

8

University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, 95616.

9

Northern California VA Health Systems3

Sue C. Bodine and 1,2,3 and Leslie M. Baehr2 Departments of Neurobiology, Physiology, and Behavior1;

10 11

Running Head: E3 Ubiquitin Ligases and Sparing of Muscle Mass

12 13

Keywords: Muscle Sparing, Ubiquitin Proteasome System, Atrogenes, Protein Quality Control

14 15 16

Corresponding author:

17

Sue C. Bodine, Ph.D.

18

Department of Neurobiology, Physiology, and Behavior, 196 Briggs Hall

19

University of California, Davis

20

One Shields Avenue, Davis, California. 95616

21

Phone: (530) 752-0694

22

Fax: (530) 752-5582

23 24

Email: [email protected]

1 Copyright © 2014 by the American Physiological Society.

25 26 27

Abstract

28

over ten years ago as two muscle specific E3 ubiquitin ligases that are transcriptionally increased

29

in skeletal muscle under atrophy-inducing conditions, making them excellent markers of muscle

30

atrophy. In the past ten years much has been published about MuRF1 and MAFbx with respect

31

to their mRNA expression patterns under atrophy-inducing conditions, their transcriptional

32

regulation, and their putative substrates. However, much remains to be learned about the

33

physiological role of both genes in the regulation of mass and other cellular functions in striated

34

muscle. While both MuRF1 and MAFbx are enriched in skeletal, cardiac, and smooth muscle,

35

this review will focus on the current understanding of MuRF1 and MAFbx in skeletal muscle,

36

highlighting the critical questions that remain to be answered.

Muscle RING Finger 1 (MuRF1) and Muscle Atrophy F-Box (MAFbx)/atrogin-1 were identified

2

37 38

Skeletal muscle is a dynamic, multicellular tissue capable of adaptation throughout life in

39

response to a variety of signals including neural activation, mechanical loading,

40

hormones/growth factors, cytokines, and nutritional status. Muscle size, i.e. fiber cross-sectional

41

area, is a particularly adaptive and important property of skeletal muscle that undergoes

42

continuous modification in order to regulate muscle strength and metabolism. Increases in fiber

43

cross-sectional area occur in response to hormones/growth factors and increased loading

44

depending on the life stage of the animal ((34, 110, 132) for review). Under many clinical

45

conditions and chronic diseases (such as limb immobilization, bed rest, mechanical ventilation,

46

sepsis, cancer cachexia, diabetes, congestive heart failure, neurodegeneration, muscular

47

dystrophies, and aging) skeletal muscle mass is lost leading to muscle weakness, inactivity, and

48

increased mortality. The loss of muscle mass, i.e. muscle atrophy, is a complex process that

49

occurs as a consequence of a variety of stressors including neural inactivity, mechanical

50

unloading, inflammation, metabolic stress, and elevated glucocorticoids. The molecules and

51

cellular pathways regulating skeletal muscle atrophy are still being discovered, however,

52

tremendous progress has been made in the last decade to identify key transcription factors,

53

signaling pathways, and cellular processes involved in the initiation and sustained breakdown of

54

muscle mass under a variety of conditions.

55 56

The focus of this review is on the specific role of Muscle RING Finger 1 (MuRF1) and Muscle

57

Atrophy F-Box (MAFbx) in the regulation of skeletal muscle atrophy, and is not meant to be a

58

comprehensive analysis of all of the mechanisms involved in the loss of muscle mass (for review

59

see (17, 64, 151). Further, while MuRF1 and MAFbx are expressed in all muscle tissues

3

60

(skeletal, cardiac and smooth), this review will concentrate on the role of these E3 ligases in

61

skeletal muscle. Readers are directed to recent reviews for additional information on the role of

62

MuRF1 and MAFbx in the regulation of cardiac mass (139, 181).

63 64

Identification of MuRF1 and MAFbx/Atrogin-1 in Skeletal Muscle

65 66

Muscle atrophy occurs as the result of changes in the balance between anabolic and catabolic

67

processes with the result being a loss of muscle mass when protein breakdown exceeds protein

68

synthesis. At the end of the 20th century, a primary driver of muscle atrophy, under most

69

conditions, was thought to be an increase in protein degradation (108). In 1969, Goldberg

70

demonstrated that an increase in protein degradation contributed to the loss of muscle mass and

71

myofibrillar proteins following denervation and glucocorticoid-treatment (49). Subsequently, it

72

was shown that increases in proteolysis occur in a variety of muscle wasting conditions including

73

sepsis, cancer, burns, diabetes and starvation, and that the primary pathway responsible for the

74

increase in muscle proteolysis under these catabolic conditions was the ATP-dependent,

75

ubiquitin-proteasome pathway (109, 140, 183). What remained a mystery, however, were the

76

molecular mediators of protein degradation and the atrophy process. Moreover, it was unknown

77

as to whether muscle atrophy, caused by different stressors, was regulated by a common

78

signaling pathway.

79 80

In 2001, two reports were published that identified two novel E3 ubiquitin ligases as key

81

regulators of muscle atrophy (15, 51). In Bodine et al. (2001), a differential display approach

82

was used to identify MuRF1 (Trim63) and MAFbx (FBX032) as genes that are similarly altered

4

83

under disparate atrophy conditions including: immobilization, denervation, hindlimb unloading,

84

dexamethasone treatment, and interleukin-1 induced cachexia. The approach taken was designed

85

to identify a common trigger for atrophy and measured differentially expressed genes in the rat

86

medial gastrocnemius after three days of ankle-immobilization, and then determined if a subset

87

of genes were universally modified in other types of muscle atrophy. This approach revealed two

88

genes whose expression was relatively low in resting skeletal muscle, but increased significantly

89

within 24 hours of inactivity or decreased loading. Sequence analysis of the genes revealed that

90

one gene was a RING finger protein previously identified as MuRF1 in cardiac tissue, but not

91

previously associated with skeletal muscle atrophy (24). The other gene was novel and

92

contained an F-box domain, which was characteristic of a family of E3 ligases that function as

93

one component of a SCF (skp1, cullin, F-box protein) ubiquitin ligase complex (159, 160). This

94

novel gene was shown to bind to both Skip and Cullin and was subsequently named MAFbx

95

(Muscle Atrophy F-box).

96 97

The FBX032 gene was simultaneously discovered by another group using a similar approach but

98

different atrophy models, and given the name atrogin-1 (51). In pursuit of key factors that

99

regulate muscle proteolysis under catabolic states, Gomes et al. (2001) used an Affymetrix

100

microarray to identify differentially expressed genes from mouse gastrocnemius muscle

101

following two days of food deprivation (51). The most highly up-regulated gene in their analysis

102

was a novel F-box protein that they named atrogin-1, which turned out to be identical to MAFbx.

103

Northern blot analysis of additional catabolic models showed that MAFbx/atrogin-1 was

104

significantly increased in models of diabetes, cancer cachexia and renal failure (51). Subsequent

105

analysis using Northern blots (since the MuRF1 gene was not represented on the microarray)

5

106

revealed that expression of MuRF1 was also highly increased in all of these catabolic models

107

(87). The E3 ubiquitin ligase, FBX032, is referred to in the literature as both MAFbx and atrogin-

108

1. For the remainder of this review, we will use MAFbx to refer to the FBX032 gene.

109 110

MuRF1 and MAFbx are E3 Ubiquitin Ligases

111 112

Muscle RING Finger 1 (MuRF1) was first identified as a novel muscle-specific RING finger

113

protein that bound to the kinase domain of the giant sarcomeric protein titin (24). Upon

114

identification of MuRF1, additional yeast two hybrid screens were performed using heart cDNA

115

libraries and MuRF1 as bait, leading to the identification of two additional RING finger proteins

116

with high homology to MuRF1: MuRF2 having 62% homology to MuRF1 and MuRF3 having

117

77% homology to MuRF1 (24). MuRF1, 2, and 3 are encoded by distinct genes and represent a

118

subgroup of the TRIM superfamily of multidomain ubiquitin E3 ligases characterized by the

119

presence of the N-terminal tripartite motif: RING domain, zinc-finger B-box domain, and

120

leucine-rich coiled-coil domain (Figure 1) (24, 104, 165). Sequence comparison of the N-

121

terminal region (140 residues) encoding the RING domain, a Zn-binding B-box motif, and a

122

MuRF family-specific conserved box (MFC) show 82-85% homology between MuRF1, 2, and 3

123

(24). Within the muscle fiber, MuRF1, MuRF2, and MuRF3 have been shown to localize at the

124

M line of the sarcomere. Additionally, MuRF1 and MuRF3 have been found at the Z lines (24,

125

104), while both MuRF1 and MuRF2 have been detected in the nucleus (86, 104, 135). The first

126

MuRF protein to be characterized was MuRF3, which was discovered to be essential for muscle

127

differentiation during development and microtubule stability (165). Further studies have

128

revealed that all three MuRFs are tightly regulated during development, with MuRF2 acting

6

129

predominantly at embryonic stages, whereas MuRF1 and MuRF3 expression increases after birth

130

(131). Similar to MuRF3, MuRF2 has been shown to be important for microtubule stability

131

along with other M-line proteins (105, 135). MuRF1 is the only family member shown to be

132

associated with muscle atrophy and to result in the attenuation of muscle loss when deleted (7,

133

15, 43, 82).

134 135

Similar to MuRF1, MAFbx expression is selective to striated muscle. The identification of an F-

136

box domain within its sequence suggested that MAFbx might function in a SCF ubiquitin ligase-

137

complex (15, 51). Futher study using yeast two hybrids and full length MAFbx as bait revealed

138

that MAFbx can bind both Skp1 and Cullin1, and that this interaction is dependent on the F-box

139

domain (15). The F-box protein provides specificity for substrate binding, and through

140

interactions with other subunits, delivers those substrates to an E2 enzyme for ubiquitination

141

(21). In mammals, there are three classes of F-box proteins based on the structure of the

142

substrate-binding domain. MAFbx is part of the FBX class because it lacks WD40 repeats and

143

leucine-rich regions, which are common structural motifs found in the other two classes.

144

Instead, MAFbx contains a PDZ motif and a cytochrome C family heme-binding site in the

145

carboxyl terminus (Figure 1) (51). Additional characterization of MAFbx has revealed that it

146

contains a leucine zipper domain and a leucine-charged residue-rich domain near its amino

147

terminus which increases the number of substrates that MAFbx can potentially recognize (171).

148

Interestingly, MAFbx also contains two nuclear localization signals, suggesting it may target

149

transcription factors or other nuclear proteins for ubiquitination.

150 151

E3 Ligases and the Ubiquitin Proteasome Pathway

7

152

The many functions of MuRF1 and MAFbx in skeletal muscle continue to be investigated, but

153

they are thought to involve the binding of selective substrates for ubiquitination and subsequent

154

degradation by the 26S proteasome. Thus, increased expression of MuRF1 and MAFbx

155

following an atrophy-inducing stressor is thought to be responsible for the shift in protein

156

balance from net synthesis to net degradation, thus inducing a loss of muscle mass. The RING

157

finger E3s, of which there are over 600 encoded in the human genome, regulate the addition of

158

ubiquitin (monoubiquitylation, multi- monoubiquitylation, and polyubiquitylation) to specific

159

proteins thus directing a variety of fates and function including: degradation by the 26S

160

proteasome, altered localization with the cell, modification of protein interactions, regulation of

161

transcription activity, and propagation of transmembrane signaling (38). Consequently,

162

perturbations in the ubiquitin protein system can affect a variety of physiological functions and

163

has been linked to aging, as well as, cancer, neurodegeneration, and muscular dystrophy (153).

164

In the case of skeletal muscle, increases in the ubiquitin proteasome system are associated with

165

the loss of muscle mass.

166 167

The ubiquitylation process includes a series of reactions involving three classes of proteins:

168

ubiquitin-activating enzymes (E1s), ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes (E2s, also referred to as

169

ubiquitin carrier proteins (UBC)), and ubiquitin-protein ligases (E3s) (107) (Figure 2). The

170

process begins with the ATP-dependent activation of ubiquitin (Ub) by an E1, which results in a

171

high energy thioester linkage between the C-terminus of ubiquitin and the active site cysteine of

172

the E1. The activated ubiquitin is then transferred to an E2 (of which there are ~40 in the

173

human genome), again forming a thioester bond. The final step is the transfer of the ubiquitin

174

from the E2 to a substrate via an E3 ligase (117, 127). Ubiquitin is usually transferred to a

8

175

lysine, or on occasion to the N-terminus, of a substrate or another ubiquitin molecule (163, 164).

176

Ubiquitin, a 76 amino acid protein with a molecular weight of 8.5 kDa, can be added to a protein

177

as a single entity (monoubiquitin) or as a chain of variable length (polyubiquitin). Ubiquitin

178

contains seven lysines (K6, K11, K27, K29, K33, K48, and K63) and thus ubiquitin molecules

179

can be linked through any one of these seven lysines (77). Ubiquitin chains can be comprised of

180

a single type of linkage (homotypic) or a mixture of linkages (heterotypic). Further, chains can

181

be unbranched or branched (forked), the latter being the result of two or more ubiquitin

182

molecules being attached to a single ubiquitin (77). Generally, it is thought that proteins with

183

homotypic polyubiquitin chains consisting of K48 and K29 linkages are targeted to the 26S

184

proteasome for degradation (127). MuRF1 and MAFbx can form K48 and K63 linkages in vitro,

185

however, the specific linkages formed with protein substrates in vivo are still unclear, and likely

186

depend on the specific E2 pairing (116).

187 188

In mammals, there are two major classes of E3 ubiquitin ligases: the HECT (Homologous to the

189

E6AP Carboxyl Terminus) E3 ligases and the RING (Really Interesting New Gene) E3 ubiquitin

190

ligases (38). The two classes differ in that the HECT domain E3s are presumed to have

191

enzymatic activity and directly catalyze the covalent attachment of ubiquitin to the substrate

192

protein, while the RING/RING-like domain E3s do not contain a catalytic domain and instead

193

function as a scaffold that bring the E2 and the protein substrate together (38, 107). The

194

majority of E3 ligases belong to the RING E3 ligases, which can exist as monomers, dimers, or

195

multi-subunit complexes. MuRF1 is an example of a simple RING E3 ligase, which can exist as

196

a monomer or dimer with itself or MuRF2 and MuRF3 (24, 114). In contrast, MAFbx belongs to

197

the cullin–RING E3 ligase (CRL) superfamily, and more specifically is a multi-subunit complex

9

198

consisting of: SKP1 and a F-box protein which serve as the substrate adaptor module, a cullin

199

protein (CUL1) that acts as a scaffold, and a RING finger protein (RBX1 or RBX2) that

200

associates with CUL1 and recruits the ubiquitin charged E2s (21, 134). Approximately 70 F-box

201

protein have been identified in the human genome (67).

202 203

For the RING E3s, the specific E2-E3 pairing is very important and can influence the type of

204

ubiquitin linkage and length of the ubiquitin chain (38). Moreover, a given RING E3 can pair

205

with multiple E2s. For example, the E3 BRCA1 can interact with 10 different E2s (28). MuRF1

206

has also been shown to interact with multiple E2s in vitro, with different E2-MuRF1 pairings

207

leading to different ubiquitin chains. For example, MuRF1 paired with the dimeric E2,

208

UbcH13/Uev1a, produces K63-chains, whereas MuRF1 paired with UbcH1 produces K48-

209

chains on the substrate (72). An important unanswered question is: what E2s pair with MuRF1

210

and MAFbx in skeletal muscle under conditions that induce muscle loss? It is quite possible that

211

different E2s are upregulated in response to different stressors, which would affect the E2-E3

212

pairings and substrate binding and ubiquitin linkages under divergent atrophy-inducing

213

conditions.

214 215

MuRF1 and MAFbx are Atrophy-Associated Genes

216 217

The discovery of MuRF1 and MAFbx yielded two genes having characteristics of key regulators

218

of skeletal muscle atrophy: (1) both genes are selectively expressed in striated muscle, (2) both

219

genes are expressed at relatively low levels in resting skeletal muscle, and (3) the expression of

220

both genes increases rapidly upon the onset of a variety of stressors and prior to the onset of

10

221

muscle loss. Since their initial discovery, MuRF1 and MAFbx mRNA expression has been

222

reported to be elevated in a wide range of atrophy-inducing conditions, and thus the two genes

223

have become recognized as key markers of muscle atrophy (Table 1). One major gap in our

224

understanding of MuRF1 and MAFbx, however, is the lack of reliable protein expression data.

225

While we know much about the time course of mRNA expression of both genes under a variety

226

of atrophy conditions, we know almost nothing about the kinetics of protein translation or decay

227

of these ligases. In this regard, a major limitation has been the availability of selective antibodies

228

that do not cross-react with other proteins.

229 230

Demonstrations that MuRF1 and MAFbx are expressed in human muscle and are elevated during

231

conditions that elicit muscle atrophy were critical findings that opened up the possibility that

232

both genes could be targets for drug development (Table 1). However, instances have been

233

found in humans when expression of MuRF1 and MAFbx was not found to be elevated during

234

muscle atrophy (69, 122, 147). For the most part, these discrepancies have come from human

235

biopsy samples taken during disuse muscle atrophy induced by limb immobilization (69) or bed

236

rest (122, 147), and often the muscle samples were taken after an extended period of time (14-60

237

days) following the initial unloading. The mRNA expression pattern of MuRF1 and MAFbx in

238

rodent models of unloading and inactivity (i.e., immobilization, hindlimb suspension and

239

denervation) is typically a rapid rise within the first 48 hours following the trigger, followed by

240

sustained elevation for 7-10 days and then a gradual decrease to baseline by around 14 days (15,

241

58, 95, 193). In humans, no time course studies comparable to the rodent experiments have been

242

done. One study did report an increase in MuRF1, but not MAFbx after 10 days of

243

immobilization in the vastus lateralis, followed by a decrease in expression of both genes from

11

244

10 to 21 days (35), which is similar to what happens in rodents. Other human immobilization

245

studies found no increase in MuRF1 or MAFbx after 48 hours (173), but significant increases in

246

both genes at 14 days in the vastus lateralis (69). The inconsistencies between human and rodent

247

immobilization studies may relate to the degree of neural inactivity and joint restriction between

248

the models, which would result in varying degrees of muscle atrophy. For example, Bodine et

249

al. (2001) induced immobilization by pinning the ankle joint, which caused complete joint

250

restriction, some neural inactivity and rapid muscle loss (~10% loss at 3 days and 30% at 7

251

days). In contrast, muscle loss in human immobilization studies often occurs at a significantly

252

slower rate (5-10 % over 7 days), which could explain the slower time course and lower

253

expression levels of MuRF1 and MAFbx in human muscle. In contrast to immobilization,

254

mRNA expression of MuRF1 and MAFbx increases significantly within 48 hours following

255

spinal cord injury in humans (172), and is at resting levels or reduced following chronic spinal

256

cord injury (2 months to 30 years, (90)), which is an expression profile that closely parallels what

257

is observed following denervation (13) and spinal cord injury (146, 193) in rodents.

258 259

The animal and human data suggest that under conditions of disuse, MuRF1 and MAFbx RNA

260

expression rapidly increases for a relatively short period of time; and thus the inability to

261

measure elevated levels of MuRF1 and MAFbx after extended periods of unloading should not

262

be interpreted to mean that these genes have not had a significant impact on the atrophy process.

263

In addition to disuse conditions (i.e. unloading and inactivity), MuRF1 and MAFbx expression is

264

elevated by inflammation, metabolic stress, and glucocorticoids (Table 1). To date, MuRF1 and

265

MAFbx mRNA expression have been shown to be elevated at some point during every condition

266

that induces skeletal muscle atrophy. In addition, MuRF1 and MAFbx are transiently expressed

12

267

at the onset of reloading following disuse atrophy (161) and following eccentric contractions

268

(101, 190), suggesting that they could be involved in the remodeling process. In this regard,

269

caution should be used when referring to the genes as “atrogenes”, a term that is commonly used

270

to describe the set of genes that are upregulated and responsible for the atrophy process.

271 272

Identification of MuRF1 and MAFbx Targets

273 274

Identification of the cellular targets of MuRF1 and MAFbx has been a difficult task and remains

275

an active area of research. The literature suggests that a given E3 can pair with different E2s

276

depending on the tissue (e.g. skeletal versus cardiac) and the cellular environment making it

277

possible that the substrates targeted for ubiquitylation by MuRF1 and MAFbx vary as a function

278

of the atrophy-inducing conditions (eg. denervation vs. unloading vs. glucocorticoids). The

279

putative substrates for MuRF1 and MAFbx have primarily been identified through binding

280

studies and in vitro ubiquitin ligase assays (71, 83, 94, 171, 184), and many have not been

281

validated in vivo. The targets identified to date have varied depending on whether in vitro or in

282

vivo systems have been used, the tissues examined (skeletal or cardiac), and the methods used to

283

increase the expression of the E3 ligases (29, 31, 68, 145).

284 285

In skeletal muscle, potential targets of MuRF1 have been based primarily on yeast two hybrid

286

screens using MuRF1 as bait or in vitro ubiquitination assays using different E2 partners. Using

287

a yeast two-hybrid screen of a skeletal muscle cDNA library, Witt et. al. (2005) identified two

288

major classes of proteins as potential MuRF1 targets: proteins involved in ATP generation and

289

myofibrillar proteins. A number of the myofibrillar proteins that were found to interact with

13

290

MuRF1 (i.e., nebulin, titin, MLC-2, cTNI) were determined not to be primary MuRF1 targets

291

since they had similar expression and ubiquitination levels in WT and MuRF1 KO mice (184).

292

Examination of protein expression in mice selectively overexpressing MuRF1 in skeletal muscle

293

has also suggested that the myofibrillar proteins are not the primary targets of MuRF1 since the

294

muscles of the transgenic mice are not atrophied and the expression levels of myofibrillar

295

proteins are not decreased relative to WT mice (60, 103). Instead, a comparison of the

296

proteasomes and transcriptomes of MuRF1-Tg and WT mice revealed significant differences in

297

enzymes involved in ATP generation, especially those involved in glycolysis, suggesting that

298

MuRF1 may play a role in metabolic regulation (60).

299 300

A primary role for MuRF1 in the degradation of myofibrillar proteins has been suggested by

301

studies using the MuRF1 KO mice and knock down of MuRF1 in C2C12 myotubes (29). Cohen

302

et al. (2009) compared the atrophy response in wild type mice and mice expressing a RING-

303

deletion mutant MuRF1, and reported that following denervation and fasting the loss of thick

304

filament proteins, such as myosin-binding protein C (MyBP-C) and myosin light chains 1 and 2

305

(MyLC1 and MyLC2), occurred prior to the loss of myosin heavy chain (MyHC), and was

306

dependent on MuRF1. Further, it was concluded that upon disassembly of the myofibrils the

307

ultimate ubiquitination and degradation of MyHC, but not actin or other thin filament proteins,

308

was MuRF1-dependent. The selective degradation of thick filament proteins by MuRF1 is based

309

on the observation that the content of MyLC1, MyLC2, MyBP-C and MyHC was higher in the

310

MuRF1 mutant mice than WT mice after 14-days of denervation, while the content of actin and

311

other thin filament proteins was decreased to a similar extent in both mutant and WT mice. Of

312

note, is that this selective sparing was only observed after 14 days of denervation, and not at

14

313

earlier time points. Furthermore, it is curious that under resting and growth conditions the

314

turnover of myofilament proteins appears to be normal in mice with a null deletion of MuRF1

315

which suggests the involvement of other ligases in the ubiquitination and turnover of both thick

316

and thin filament proteins, at least under resting conditions. With respect to actin degradation,

317

multiple E3 ligases have been implicated in its ubiquitination and targeted destruction (32, 79,

318

137). At this time it is clear that myofibrillar proteins can be ubiquitinylated by MuRF1 in vitro,

319

however, under in vivo conditions of atrophy it is not clear whether the myofibrillar proteins are

320

the primary targets of MuRF1-dependent ubiquitination and degradation, or are spared as a

321

consequence of changes in other signaling pathways.

322 323

The two most widely acknowledged targets of MAFbx in skeletal muscle are MyoD, a myogenic

324

regulatory factor, and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit f (eIF3-f) (83, 171). More

325

recently, MyHC and other sarcomeric proteins, such as the intermediate filament proteins

326

vimentin and desmin, have been identified as potential MAFbx substrates (97, 99). All of the

327

putative targets of MAFbx have been identified using C2C12 cells and require further in vivo

328

validation. In developing C2C12 cells, there is strong support for a direct link between MyoD and

329

MAFbx. First, MyoD degradation is mediated by the ubiquitin proteasome system and MAFbx

330

was found to interact with MyoD and mediate its ubiquitination in vitro through a lysine-

331

dependent pathway (171). Second, MAFbx and MyoD expression was inversely related during

332

the course of C2C12 differentiation, and over-expression of MAFbx suppressed MyoD-induced

333

differentiation and inhibited myotube formation (171). Additional support for the conclusion

334

that high levels of MAFbx are incompatible with proper myoblast fusion and differentiation

335

comes from a study by Nicolas et al. who found elevated levels of MAFbx, satellite cell

15

336

deregulation, and failure of postnatal growth in transgenic mice expressing a truncated dominant-

337

negative form of PW1 (118). However, other ligases must be able to mediate MyoD degradation

338

since myogenesis and postnatal growth is normal in mice with a null deletion of MAFbx.

339 340

The identification of MyoD and eIF3-f as MAFbx targets has led many to suggest that MAFbx

341

controls protein synthesis, while MuRF1 controls protein degradation. While over-expression of

342

eIF3-f can induce hypertrophy and inhibition can cause atrophy in myotubes, there is no direct

343

data to show that eIF3-f expression levels in adult muscle fibers is controlled by MAFbx

344

expression. Further, the extent and importance of MAFbx-mediated MyoD degradation in adult

345

muscle fibers during atrophy is not clear. In fact, mice with genetic ablation of MAFbx do not

346

have larger than normal myofibers, nor do they hypertrophy to a greater extent than WT mice in

347

response to functional overload (8). To the contrary, mice with a null deletion of MuRF1 have

348

been shown to have elevated levels of protein synthesis under certain atrophy conditions (7, 76),

349

and to maintain the ability to hypertrophy in response to loading as they age (62). To date, both

350

MuRF1 and MAFbx have been reported to have the ability to bind MyHC and other myofibrillar

351

proteins and to mediate the ubiquitination of these proteins in vitro. It is possible that the two E3

352

ligases have overlapping sets of substrates, however, it is more likely the case that they have

353

distinct sets of substrates especially given their different phenotypes when challenged in vivo

354

(Table 2). Clearly, additional studies are required to identify the primary in vivo substrates of

355

these atrophy-associated muscle specific E3 ligases, which could vary depending on the atrophy

356

conditions.

357 358

Transcriptional Regulation of MuRF1 and MAFbx

16

359 360

The finding that MuRF1 and MAFbx are transcriptionally upregulated together under most

361

atrophy-inducing conditions suggests that the two E3 ligases are under the regulation of similar

362

sets of transcription factors. The first transcription factors shown to regulate transcription of

363

both E3 ligases were the class O type forkhead transcription factors (FOXO), which include

364

FOXO1, FOXO3a and FOXO4. All of the FOXO transcription factors are expressed in skeletal

365

muscle and expression of FOXO1 and FOXO3a increases during certain forms of atrophy (7, 27,

366

47, 87, 146, 148, 154). In 2004, two reports were published demonstrating the ability of the

367

FOXO transcription factors to activate MuRF1 and/or MAFbx (148, 167). In Stitt et al. it was

368

revealed that activated FOXO1 was necessary, but not sufficient to increase MuRF1 and MAFbx

369

gene expression in cultured myotubes, and that IGF-1 was able to block the transcriptional

370

activation of both genes in response to dexamethasome (167). In contrast, Sandri et al.

371

concentrated their investigation on FOXO3a and demonstrated that constitutively activate

372

FOXO3a was able to activate the MAFbx promoter in vitro and in vivo, and induce muscle

373

atrophy (148). Following these reports, Waddell et al. provided further evidence that the FOXO

374

transcription factors can directly bind to the MuRF1 and MAFbx promoter, however, it was

375

observed that not all FOXO family members equally activate the FOXO binding motif in the

376

promoters (177). Moreover, it was demonstrated that the MuRF1 promoter has a perfect

377

palindromic glucocorticoid response element (GRE) in the proximal region of the promoter that

378

directly binds the homodimerized glucocorticoid receptor (177). While expression of both

379

MuRF1 and MAFbx increase in response to the synthetic glucocorticoid dexamethasone, the

380

activation of MAFbx is indirect since the promoter activity is not increased by an activated

381

glucocorticoid receptor alone, and thus increased expression of MAFbx in response to

17

382

glucocorticoids is likely related to increased expression of other glucocorticoid responsive

383

transcription factors such as the FOXO transcription factors (7) or KLF-15 (Kruppel-Like

384

Factor-15) (157). While the induction of MuRF1 and MAFbx expression in response to

385

exogenous glucocorticoids is dependent on the glucocorticoid receptor, other atrophy-inducing

386

stimuli, such as denervation, do not require an activated glucocorticoid receptor to increase

387

MuRF1 and MAFbx expression (180).

388 389

The transcription factor, KLF-15, is a glucocorticoid responsive gene that is upregulated in

390

skeletal muscle by dexamethasone. Furthermore, forced overexpression of KLF-15 in muscle is

391

capable of increasing the expression of both MuRF1 and MAFbx (157). Examination of the

392

MuRF1 and MAFbx proximal promoter regions revealed that both genes have multiple KLF-15

393

binding sites, some of which are in close proximity to the FOXO binding sites and the GRE

394

(157). Interestingly, KLF-15 also increases the expression of FOXO1 and FOXO3a, and thus

395

KLF-15 has the ability to activate transcription of MuRF1 and MAFbx directly and through the

396

induction of the FOXO transcription factors. Indeed, activation of the MuRF1 and MAFbx

397

promoters in L6 myoblasts and in the tibialis anterior was significantly greater in response to a

398

combination of FOXO1 and KLF-15 as compared to the individual effects. This was a second

399

demonstration of cooperative activation of the MuRF1 promoter since Waddell et al.

400

demonstrated synergy between FOXO1 and the activated glucocorticoid receptor (177). In this

401

instance, it was shown that the GR-FOXO1 synergy was dependent on the interaction between

402

the GRE and the adjacent FOXO binding element. Of potential physiological relevance was the

403

finding that this interaction enabled low doses of glucocorticoids to fully activate the MuRF1

404

promoter in the presence of FOXO1.

18

405 406

The MuRF1 and MAFbx promoters have putative binding sites for other transcription factors

407

such as the NF-κB transcription factors, C/EBPβ, and Smad3, which can activate either MuRF1

408

or MAFbx individually or in combination with other factors. Numerous studies have

409

demonstrated a role for the NF-κB transcription factors (p65, c-Rel, RelB, p52, p50) in the

410

induction of muscle atrophy under conditions such as disuse (70, 174), denervation (112), aging

411

(12) and cachexia (20, 144). Muscle atrophy induced by elevated levels of the NF-κB

412

transcription factors is often associated with increased expression of the E3 ligases, MuRF1 and

413

MAFbx (20, 186); and in recent reports it was demonstrated that both genes are direct targets of

414

p50 and Bcl-3 and have conserved κB sites either upstream or downstream of the transcriptional

415

start site (65, 186).

416 417

Activation of MAFbx, but not MuRF1, also appears to be under the control of the C/EBP

418

transcription factor (194). Tumor necrosis factor- (TNF-) increases MAFbx expression both

419

in vitro and in vivo via a mechanism dependent on FOXO4 expression, but not FOXO1/3a, and

420

activation of p38/MAPK (96, 113). More recently it was demonstrated that increased p38 

421

MAPK activity in myotubes lead to phosphorylation and activation of C/EBP, which was

422

capable of binding to and activating the MAFbx promoter (195).

423 424

Another example of diversity in the activation of MuRF1 and MAFbx is through myostatin, a

425

TGF family member, which when elevated in vitro results in an increase in the expression of

426

MAFbx, and to a lesser extent MuRF1 (97, 99). Activation of the TGF pathway in vivo through

427

overexpression of constitutively active activin receptor-like kinase 5 was shown to induce

19

428

muscle atrophy through a mechanism that involved the increased expression of MAFbx, but not

429

MuRF1 (149). More recently it was shown that overexpression of Smad3, a transcription factor

430

activated by myostatin, in myofibers resulted in 1.8 fold induction of MAFbx promoter activity,

431

and no change in MuRF1 activity, suggesting a mechanism by which myostatin could induce

432

MAFbx expression (54). However, in this report it was unclear as to whether Smad3 activation

433

of MAFbx was direct or indirect through the induction of another factor such as the transcription

434

factor FOX03a. Recently, Bollinger et al. examined the ability of Smad3 and FOXO3a to

435

increase both MuRF1 and MAFbx expression (16). It was found that coexpression of Smad3 and

436

FOXO3a (or FOXO1) increased MuRF1 and MAFbx transcriptional activity to a greater extent

437

than FOXO expression alone (16). This report differed from previous publications in that they

438

found that Smad3 overexpression alone did not increase the expression of either MuRF1 or

439

MAFbx. Examination of the proximal promoter regions of both MuRF1 and MAFbx revealed

440

multiple conserved FoxO responsive elements adjacent to SMAD-binding elements in the

441

MuRF1 promoter. Mutation of the proximal SMAD-binding site eliminated the synergistic

442

activation of the MuRF1 promoter by FOXO3a and Smad3 (16). These authors propose a

443

mechanism by which Smad3 regulates MuRF1 expression by increasing binding of the FOXO

444

transcription factors to the proximal promoter region and also by increasing FOXO3a protein

445

content through an increase in FOXO3a transcription. As noted earlier, cooperative regulation of

446

the MuRF1 promoter by the FOXO transcription factors and other factors such as the

447

glucocorticoid receptor (177) and KLF-15 (157) have been observed.

448 449

The literature suggests that transcriptional control of MuRF1 and MAFbx is complex. The

450

discovery that multiple transcription factors can activate MuRF1 and MAFbx may explain the

20

451

fact that these genes are activated under such a variety of atrophy conditions. Further, the ability

452

of multiple transcription factors to cooperate in the activation of these genes may explain the

453

variable expression patterns observed under different atrophy conditions.

454 455

The Role of MuRF1 and MAFbx in the Regulation of Muscle Mass

456 457

The generation of mice with a null deletion of either MuRF1 (Trim63) or MAFbx (Fbxo32) has

458

allowed for the examination of the physiological function and importance of these two E3 ligases

459

in the regulation of skeletal muscle mass (15). Table 2 describes the phenotype of each knock

460

out mouse under resting conditions and in response to various challenges. Interestingly, at birth

461

and during the first two months of postnatal development, neither mouse strain exhibits a

462

phenotype that differs from WT mice. With age, the two strains begin to show different

463

phenotypes, particularly with respect to the heart, suggesting that MuRF1 and MAFbx control

464

different sets of substrates (63, 192).

465 466

The first atrophy model to be tested using the knock out mice was denervation, where it was

467

demonstrated that deletion of each gene individually resulted in significant sparing of mass in

468

both the tibialis anterior and gastrocnemius muscles; MAFbx KO showing sparing at both 7 and

469

14 days and the MuRF1 KO showing sparing at 14 days (15). In follow-up studies with an

470

extended period of denervation (28 days) it was shown that the mass of both the gastrocnemius

471

and tibialis anterior muscles continued to be spared in MuRF1 and MAFbx KO mice (50).

472

Histological analysis, however, revealed a significant difference in the response of muscles from

473

MuRF1 and MAFbx KO mice to denervation, with muscles in the MAFbx KO mice showing an

21

474

increase in the percentage of vacuole-containing fibers and a greater incidence of muscle fiber

475

necrosis (50). The phenotype observed in the MAFbx KO mice following extended denervation

476

is reminiscent of the phenotype observed following denervation in mice with a muscle specific

477

deletion of Runx1 (runt-related transcription factor 1) (178), and might suggest that some level

478

of MAFbx expression is required to prevent rapid degeneration of muscle fibers following the

479

loss of innervation. It could be that preventing the ubiquitination of MAFbx targets prevents

480

their degradation, leading to their accumulation, which ultimately initiates fiber necrosis. This

481

theory requires further investigation, however, what is known is that complete suppression of

482

MAFbx is not required to achieve muscle sparing since MAFbx expression levels are not

483

suppressed, but maintained at elevated levels in the MuRF1 KO mice following denervation

484

(50).

485 486

Besides denervation, the deletion of MuRF1 has been shown to lead to functional sparing of

487

muscle mass following hindlimb unloading (82), treatment with excess synthetic glucocorticoids

488

(7), and acute lung injury (43). In contrast, deletion of MAFbx does not lead to muscle sparing

489

following glucocorticoid treatment or acute lung injury. Further, neither deletion of MuRF1 nor

490

MAFbx results in the sparing of muscle mass in response to nutritional deprivation (7). The role

491

of MuRF1 and MAFbx in age-related muscle loss has been controversial since no change (48),

492

decreased expression (42), and increased expression (30) of both E3 ligases has been reported in

493

aging rodents. We recently examined the expression of both MuRF1 and MAFbx in aging WT

494

(C57BL6 background) and MuRF1 KO mice, and found no significant increase in either gene in

495

WT mice up to 24 months of age; however, we did find a significant increase in MAFbx

496

expression in the MuRF1 KO mice (62). Interestingly, we found that deletion of MuRF1

22

497

resulted in the maintenance of muscle mass with age and in a maintained ability to hypertrophy

498

in response to increased loading with age (62). Age-related muscle loss was not examined in the

499

MAFbx KO mice since these mice develop congestive heart failure and die prematurely between

500

16-18 months of age (102, 192).

501 502

In general, the experiments on the MuRF1 and MAFbx knock out mice suggest that MuRF1

503

would be a better candidate than MAFbx for drug development targeted to treat muscle atrophy

504

because the deletion of MuRF1 results in muscle sparing under more conditions than the deletion

505

of MAFbx. Moreover, the mass that is spared in response to MuRF1 deletion appears to be

506

functional in that force output is proportional to muscle mass. The only instance where MuRF1

507

deletion did not lead to functional sparing was in aged (24 month old) mice, however further

508

studies are needed to rule out changes in innervation or synaptic instability in the MuRF1 KO

509

mice with age. In the case of MAFbx, it may be that suppression (as opposed to complete

510

inhibition) of MAFbx, along with complete inhibition of MuRF1 could be a good strategy for

511

many forms of muscle atrophy. A question that remains to be answered, and will likely require

512

pharmaceutical agents to block MuRF1 activity is: when and for how long does MuRF1 need to

513

be inhibited? The timing and duration of inhibition likely depends on the type of atrophy. For

514

example, in response to inactivity or unloading, MuRF1 expression increases rapidly and then

515

returns to baseline within two weeks. Interestingly, the muscle sparing effect in the MuRF1 null

516

mice does not occur until after the first week of inactivity when MuRF1 expression is on its

517

decline (15). Given this observation, one might propose that MuRF1 inhibition does not need to

518

occur until after the first week of inactivity; however, that may be too late since the critical

519

interactions between MuRF1 and its primary targets may occur early, soon after the onset of the

23

520

atrophy stimulus, setting off a cascade of events having significant ramifications at later time

521

points. While targeting MuRF1 early may be necessary for inactivity models of atrophy, it may

522

be that under chronic metabolic or inflammatory diseases suppression of MuRF1 would be

523

advantageous at any time during the course of the disease. In this regard, a better understanding

524

of the kinetics of MuRF1 and MAFbx protein expression is needed.

525 526

The ability of MuRF1 inhibition to produce functional muscle sparing in a variety of atrophy

527

models suggests that the deletion of MuRF1 may target key regulatory proteins involved in the

528

activation of critical signaling cascades that drive muscle atrophy. It is still unclear whether the

529

primary pathways affected by upregulation of MuRF1 expression are those involved in protein

530

degradation, protein synthesis, or energy production. Comparisons of wild type and MuRF1 KO

531

mice under a variety of challenges have revealed that different pathways are affected by the

532

deletion of MuRF1 depending on the model under study (Figure 3), however the suppression of

533

cellular stress may be a common theme in a number of the models which requires further

534

investigation.

535 536

We recently compared the effect of denervation on the activation of a number of proteolytic

537

pathways in WT and MuRF1 KO mice, and found that deletion of MuRF1 did result in

538

suppression of some components of the ubiquitin proteasome pathway such as Nedd4, USP19,

539

USP14, UCHL1, but did not suppress the overall capacity for proteolysis in that the activity of

540

calcium-dependent calpain I and II proteases and the lysosomal enzyme, cathepsin L, were

541

similar between WT and KO mice (46, 50). Moreover, it was found that both 20S and 26S

542

proteasome activities were elevated to a greater extent in KO compared to WT mice following

24

543

denervation, and that MAFbx expression remained elevated at 14 days in the MuRF1 KO mice

544

(50). Interestingly, we found that the fractional synthesis rate was elevated in both WT and KO

545

mice at 14 days of denervation (50); however, what remains to be determined is whether the

546

same set of proteins are being translated in the WT and MuRF1 KO mice following denervation.

547 548

Differential regulation of protein synthesis in MuRF1 KO relative to WT mice has been observed

549

in response to glucocorticoid treatment (7) and during load-induced growth in aged mice (62). In

550

response to glucocorticoids, muscle sparing in the MuRF1 KO mice was related primarily to the

551

early maintenance of protein synthesis and the overall suppression of FOXO1 expression (7).

552

More recently, we also observed that the deletion of MuRF1 prevents, or at least delays, the

553

development of anabolic resistance in older mice. Muscle growth in response to functional

554

overload is significantly reduced in old (18 months) relative to young (6 months) WT mice (62).

555

In contrast, there is no decrease in load-induced growth in old MuRF1 KO mice. The maintained

556

growth response in MuRF1 KO mice was associated with less ER stress and greater activation of

557

the Akt/mTOR signaling pathways, suggesting an increase in protein synthesis (62). One

558

mechanism by which the deletion of MuRF1 results in muscle sparing under a variety of

559

disparate conditions may be related to an increased ability to decrease cellular stress and

560

maintain global protein synthesis. This could be mediated in part through the ubiquitin

561

proteasome system and the removal of misfolded or modified proteins. Overall, we have found

562

no evidence that MuRF1 and MAFbx directly control other proteolytic pathways such as the

563

calcium-dependent calpains, lysosomal cathepsins, caspase-3, or autophagy.

564

25

565

The possibility exists that some of the targets of MuRF1-dependent ubiquitination are

566

transcription factors. MuRF1 has been reported to be localized at the M-line of the sarcomere

567

(24), but also to translocate to the nucleus of muscle fibers following inactivity and unloading

568

(121). Further, in vitro, MuRF1 has been reported to interact with known transcription factors

569

such as SRF (182) and GMEB-1 (104). The ability of MuRF1 to influence gene expression was

570

recently examined and compared in two models of atrophy, denervation and glucocorticoid

571

treatment (46). Evaluation of gene expression patterns in WT and MuRF1 KO mice following 3

572

and 14 days of denervation or dexamethasone-treatment revealed that MuRF1 influenced distinct

573

gene networks in these two distinct atrophy models. Overall, denervation resulted in the

574

differential expression of a much larger and different set of genes than dexamethasone treatment,

575

with only a small set of regulated genes being common to both models: MuRF1, MAFbx,

576

FOXO1, EIF4EBP1, ANKRD1 (mCARP), CDKN1A (p21) and TNFRSF12A (TWEAK) (46).

577

Following denervation, mice lacking MuRF1 showed suppression of genes associated with the

578

neuromuscular junction, which correlated with blunted HDAC4 upregulation (46).

579 580

Examination of muscle atrophy in MuRF1 KO mice, and to a lesser degree MAFbx KO mice,

581

have demonstrated the importance of these E3 ubiquitin ligases in mediating muscle atrophy in

582

response to divergent triggers. Sparing of muscle mass has been achieved through the

583

manipulation of other molecules such as the FOXO and NF-B transcription factors; however, in

584

the majority of these studies suppression of both MuRF1 and MAFbx has been reported to occur

585

and may be playing a role in the muscle sparing effect. For example, direct inhibition of FOXO

586

transcriptional activity leads to the attenuation of cachexia and disuse-induced muscle atrophy

587

through a mechanism that likely includes the suppression of MuRF1 and MAFbx expression

26

588

(143). Near complete sparing of immobilization-induced atrophy was found with over-

589

expression of HSP70, which suppressed the transcriptional activities of both FOXO3a and NF-

590

B and reduced the expression of MuRF1 and MAFbx (155). Muscle sparing and suppression of

591

MuRF1 and MAFbx expression has also been reported following hindlimb unloading in mice

592

lacking the Nfkb1 gene (that encodes the NFkB transcription factor, p50) or Bcl-3 (186). A role

593

for MuRF1 in NF-κB mediated loss of muscle mass was demonstrated in Cai et al. (2004), where

594

NF-B signaling was activated through muscle-specific expression of activated IB kinase 

595

(MIKK mice) and shown to induce muscle atrophy (20). Increased expression of MuRF1, but

596

not MAFbx, was observed in the MIKK mice, and subsequent breeding of MIKK x MuRF1-/-

597

mice resulted in an intermediate phenotype with approximately a 50% increase in body weight in

598

the MIKK x MuRF-/- mice relative to the MIKK mice.

599 600

Several pharmaceutical treatments have been shown to result in muscle sparing with variable

601

effects on MuRF1 and MAFbx expression. Clenbuterol, a 2 adrenergic agonist, has been

602

shown to induce muscle hypertrophy in young and old rodents in an mTOR-dependent manner

603

and to attenuate the loss of muscle mass following denervation and hindlimb unloading through

604

both mTOR-dependent and independent mechanisms (59, 74, 162). Interesting, under multiple

605

conditions (resting, growth, and atrophy-inducing conditions) clenbuterol has been shown to

606

suppress the expression levels of both MuRF1 and MAFbx (52, 53, 74). Other compounds that

607

mediate their anti-atrophy responses through G-protein coupled receptors are acetylated and

608

unacetylated ghrelin (138). Recently both acetylated and unacetylated ghrelin have been shown

609

to spare muscle mass under conditions of fasting and denervation, through a mechanism that

610

appears to involve the suppression of MAFbx and possibly MuRF1 (138). Furthermore,

27

611

exogenous ghrelin has been shown to inhibit protein breakdown and significantly suppress the

612

upregulation of both MuRF1 and MAFbx mRNA and inflammatory cytokine expression in lower

613

limb muscles following a third-degree burn injury to the back affecting 30% of the total body

614

surface area (10).

615 616

These studies provide additional support for the conclusion that MuRF1 and MAFbx are critical

617

downstream regulators of the atrophy process, but they highlight the fact that other signaling

618

pathways are involved. As noted in the original publication of the MuRF1 and MAFbx KO mice

619

(15), deletion of each gene individually attenuates muscle atrophy, but does not prevent muscle

620

atrophy. Further, the sparing of muscle mass does not always occur immediately in either knock

621

out mouse. Of particular note is the fact that forced overexpression of MuRF1 or MAFbx alone

622

does not induce muscle atrophy. This may suggest that the substrates for MuRF1 and MAFbx

623

are not expressed in resting muscle and/or that MuRF1 and MAFbx require the interaction with

624

other signaling pathways to induce muscle loss.

625 626

Signaling pathways, which are independent of MuRF1 and MAFbx expression, are clearly

627

involved in muscle atrophy. Potential pathways that are involved in muscle atrophy and

628

independent of MuRF1/MAFbx expression are those regulated by ATF4 (activating transcription

629

factor 4) and the tumor suppressor p53 (18, 41, 44). Both transcription factors are upregulated

630

under a variety of atrophy conditions, and forced over expression of each gene induces muscle

631

loss (41, 44). Interestingly, mice with a muscle specific ATF4 deletion are protected from

632

immobilization-induced atrophy without the suppression of MuRF1 or MAFbx; however, the

633

sparing of muscle mass occurs only during the first four days of disuse and is not evident after

28

634

seven days (41). Furthermore, muscle specific ATF KO mice do not exhibit muscle sparing

635

following denervation (44). Muscle atrophy induced by p53 appears to be independent of both

636

ATF4 and MuRF1/MAFbx, and mice with muscle specific deletion of p53 are partially protected

637

from immobilization-induced atrophy (44). Of particular interest is the observation that muscle

638

specific deletion of both ATF4 and p53 results in complete sparing of muscle fiber cross-

639

sectional area following immobilization, at least for 3 days (44). These recent data, coupled with

640

the findings from the MuRF1 KO mice, show that multiple signaling pathways are involved in

641

muscle atrophy; and suggest that different signaling pathways may be responsible for muscle

642

loss at specific time points throughout the process. If this is the case, then multiple therapeutic

643

agents may be required to target multiple proteolytic pathways in order to prevent muscle

644

atrophy.

645 646

Other E3 ligases in muscle

647 648

In addition to MuRF1 and MAFbx, a number of other E3 ubiquitin ligases have been identified

649

in skeletal muscle and associated with the regulation of skeletal muscle under atrophy-inducing

650

conditions. A new F-box protein (Fbxo30), belonging to the SCF complex family of E3 ubiquitin

651

ligases, was recently identified in skeletal muscle and shown to be upregulated following

652

denervation and to undergo autoubiquitination, similar to other E3 ligases. Fbox30, named

653

MUSA1 (muscle ubiquitin ligase of SCF complex in atrophy-1), appears to be inhibited by the

654

BMP pathway under normal conditions based on the findings that MUSA1 is more highly

655

expressed in denervated muscles of Smad4-/- mice than WT mice and is elevated in muscles

656

overexpressing the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) inhibitor, noggin (150). Knock down of

29

657

MUSA1 protein expression in the tibialis anterior using in vivo electroporation of shRNA

658

resulted in sparing of muscle mass following denervation and prevented the excessive

659

denervation-induced atrophy observed in Smad4-/- mice (150). These data suggest that MUSA1

660

is an important regulator of skeletal muscle mass, especially under extended durations of

661

inactivity. Interestingly, MuRF1 and MAFbx expression were not affected by manipulation of

662

BMP signaling (150).

663 664

Nedd4-1 (Neural precursor cell expressed developmentally down-regulated protein 4) is a HECT

665

domain ubiquitin ligase that shows sustained long-term increased expression in skeletal muscle

666

following denervation (13, 75), hindlimb unloading (75), and severe chronic obstructive

667

pulmonary disease (136). In a recent study, a skeletal muscle specific Nedd-4 knock out mouse

668

was generated and shown to have muscle sparing following both 7 and 14 days of denervation,

669

which differs from the MuRF1 KO that only shows sparing after 7 days of denervation (115).

670

Interestingly, Nedd-4 expression is selectively suppressed in the MuRF1 KO mice following

671

denervation (50). It is unknown whether MuRF1 and/or MAFbx expression were affected in the

672

Nedd-4 KO mice since their expression was not reported.

673 674

Trim32 is another E3 ubiquitin ligase belonging to the tripartite motif family, like MuRF1

675

(Trim63). Unlike MuRF1, Trim32 is ubiquitously expressed with expression levels being 100-

676

fold higher in brain than in skeletal muscle (80). Mutations in Trim32 have been linked to a mild

677

form of dystrophy, limb girdle muscular dystrophy type 2H, and sarcotubular myopathy (79,

678

152). Mice with a null deletion of Trim32 develop a mild myopathy and premature aging; yet

679

demonstrate a normal rate and amount of muscle loss in response to fasting and hindlimb

30

680

unloading (80). The observation that deletion of Trim32 does not affect muscle atrophy

681

contrasts with another study that reports that suppression of Trim32 expression, using in vivo

682

electroporation of shRNA, selectively blocked the loss of thin filament proteins and α-actinin

683

under fasting conditions (32). Cohen et al. (2012) proposed that fasting leads to the

684

phosphorylation of desmin, which leads to its ubiquitylation by Trim32 and subsequent

685

degradation. The loss of desmin subsequently leads to the degradation of α-actinin and the

686

loosening of the thin filaments, making them susceptible to ubiquitylation by Trim32 (32). This

687

model differs greatly from that proposed by Kudryashova et al. (2009) who suggested that

688

Trim32 plays an important role in muscle growth through the regulation of satellite cell

689

proliferation and differentiation since Trim32 KO mice were found to have impaired growth

690

following disuse induced by hindlimb unloading and demonstrate premature aging of skeletal

691

muscle. Trim32 is not upregulated under all forms of atrophy and its precise role in the

692

regulation of skeletal muscle size, especially muscle loss, remains to be determined.

693 694

TNF receptor adaptor protein 6 (TRAF6) is a member of the TRAF family of conserved adaptor

695

proteins that has been shown to be involved in the activation of various signaling cascades

696

including NF-κB, MAPK and PI3K/Akt (84, 129, 189). TRAF6 is distinct among the TRAF

697

family members in that it has been shown to have E3 ubiquitin ligase activity and to be

698

upregulated in skeletal muscle in response to denervation, starvation, and cancer cachexia (128,

699

129). Skeletal muscle specific deletion of TRAF6 in mice results in partial sparing of muscle

700

mass following denervation (129) and starvation (128), and prevention of cancer cachexia

701

induced by Lewis Lung Carcinoma cells (129). The protective effects of TRAF6 deletion were

702

related to suppression of NF-κB, AMPK, JNK and p38 MAPK activation, as well as a

31

703

suppression of MuRF1 and MAFbx expression (129). Interestingly, there was little suppression

704

of MuRF1 and MAFbx expression in the TRAF6 KO mice following starvation; however, this is

705

consistent with the finding that muscle loss in response to nutritional deprivation is not spared in

706

either the MuRF1 or MAFbx KO mice (7, 129). In TRAF6 KO mice, muscle sparing is much

707

greater in the cancer cachexia than denervation, which also correlates to the level of suppression

708

of MuRF1 (129). The data suggest that TRAF6 is upstream of MuRF1 and MAFbx and is an

709

important regulator of muscle mass under conditions involving the activation of pro-

710

inflammatory pathways (81).

711 712

Conclusions

713

MuRF1 and MAFbx represent just two of many E3 ubiquitin ligases that are expressed in

714

skeletal muscle. They are significant, however, because they are primarily expressed in muscle

715

tissues and their expression level in skeletal muscle is significantly increased in response to

716

multiple stressors that induce skeletal muscle atrophy. More importantly, suppression or

717

complete inhibition of their expression results in muscle sparing in multiple atrophy models. In

718

the case of MAFbx, complete inhibition of its expression during atrophy conditions appears to be

719

deleterious. Because the expression of MuRF1 and MAFbx increases during multiple atrophy-

720

inducing conditions they are often referred to as “atrogenes”. However, the expression of

721

MuRF1 and MAFbx is also transiently increased in response to mechanical load, and thus could

722

be associated with the remodeling process.

723 724

The distinct phenotypes of the MuRF1 and MAFbx knock out mice suggest that these two E3

725

ligases have distinct sets of substrates. However, the mechanisms by which suppression of

32

726

MuRF1, in particular, leads to sparing of muscle atrophy remain unclear. The primary substrates

727

for MuRF1 have been suggested to be proteins associated with the thick myofilament; however,

728

the broad effects of MuRF1 deletion on multiple cellular pathways suggest that the primary in

729

vivo substrates of MuRF1 have yet to be identified. One pathway that appears to be affected by

730

MuRF1 deletion in multiple atrophy models is endoplasmic reticulum stress, but further research

731

is needed to determine the mechanism by which MuRF1 regulates cellular stress within the

732

myofiber. In conclusion, MuRF1 and MAFbx are important muscle specific E3 ligases,

733

however, much remains to be understood about their function in regulating muscle mass and

734

other cellular functions in skeletal muscle.

735 736

Acknowledgements

737

We thank our colleagues at the University of California, Davis who have contributed to the

738

published work presented in this review. We thank Regeneron Pharmaceuticals for providing the

739

MuRF1 and MAFbx KO mice and for supporting the research that went into the initial discovery

740

of these novel muscle-atrophy associated genes. This research was supported by grants to SB

741

from the Muscular Dystrophy Association, National Institute of Health (NIDDK) and the

742

Veterans Administration (RR&D).

743

33

744

References:

745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788

1. Adams V, Mangner N, Gasch A, Krohne C, Gielen S, Hirner S, Thierse HJ, Witt CC, Linke A, Schuler G, and Labeit S. Induction of MuRF1 is essential for TNF-alpha-induced loss of muscle function in mice. J Mol Biol 384: 48-59, 2008. 2. Allen DL, Bandstra ER, Harrison BC, Thorng S, Stodieck LS, Kostenuik PJ, Morony S, Lacey DL, Hammond TG, Leinwand LL, Argraves WS, Bateman TA, and Barth JL. Effects of spaceflight on murine skeletal muscle gene expression. Journal of applied physiology 106: 582-595, 2009. 3. Allen DL, Cleary AS, Lindsay SF, Loh AS, and Reed JM. Myostatin expression is increased by food deprivation in a muscle-specific manner and contributes to muscle atrophy during prolonged food deprivation in mice. Journal of applied physiology 109: 692701, 2010. 4. Almon RR, DuBois DC, Yao Z, Hoffman EP, Ghimbovschi S, and Jusko WJ. Microarray analysis of the temporal response of skeletal muscle to methylprednisolone: comparative analysis of two dosing regimens. Physiological genomics 30: 282-299, 2007. 5. Altun M, Besche HC, Overkleeft HS, Piccirillo R, Edelmann MJ, Kessler BM, Goldberg AL, and Ulfhake B. Muscle Wasting in Aged, Sarcopenic Rats Is Associated with Enhanced Activity of the Ubiquitin Proteasome Pathway. Journal of Biological Chemistry 285: 39597-39608, 2010. 6. Asp ML, Tian M, Wendel AA, and Belury MA. Evidence for the contribution of insulin resistance to the development of cachexia in tumor-bearing mice. Int J Cancer 126: 756-763, 2010. 7. Baehr LM, Furlow JD, and Bodine SC. Muscle Sparing in Muscle RING Finger 1 Null Mice: Response to Synthetic Glucocorticoids. The Journal of physiology 2011. 8. Baehr LM, Tunzi M, and Bodine SC. Muscle hypertrophy is associated with increases in proteasome activity that is independent of MuRF1 and MAFbx expression. Frontiers in physiology 5: 69, 2014. 9. Bailey AN, Hocker AD, Vermillion BR, Smolkowski K, Shah SN, Jewett BA, and Dreyer HC. MAFbx, MuRF1, and the stress-activated protein kinases are upregulated in muscle cells during total knee arthroplasty. American Journal of Physiology - Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 303: R376-R386, 2012. 10. Balasubramaniam A, Joshi R, Su C, Friend LA, Sheriff S, Kagan RJ, and James JH. Ghrelin inhibits skeletal muscle protein breakdown in rats with thermal injury through normalizing elevated expression of E3 ubiquitin ligases MuRF1 and MAFbx. American Journal of Physiology - Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 296: R893-R901, 2009. 11. Baptista IL, Leal ML, Artioli GG, Aoki MS, Fiamoncini J, Turri AO, Curi R, Miyabara EH, and Moriscot AS. Leucine attenuates skeletal muscle wasting via inhibition of ubiquitin ligases. Muscle & Nerve 41: 800-808, 2010. 12. Bar-Shai M, Carmeli E, Ljubuncic P, and Reznick AZ. Exercise and immobilization in aging animals: The involvement of oxidative stress and NF-κB activation. Free Radical Biology and Medicine 44: 202-214, 2008. 13. Batt J, Bain J, Goncalves J, Michalski B, Plant P, Fahnestock M, and Woodgett J. Differential gene expression profiling of short and long term denervated muscle. The FASEB Journal 2005. 34

789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832

14. Batt J, Shadly Ahmed S, Correa J, Bain A, and Granton J. Skeletal Muscle Dysfunction in Idiopathic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology 2013. 15. Bodine SC, Latres E, Baumhueter S, Lai VK-M, Nunez L, Clarke BA, Poueymirou WT, Panaro FJ, Na E, Dharmarajan K, Pan Z-Q, Valenzuela DM, DeChiara TM, Stitt TN, Yancopoulos GD, and Glass DJ. Identification of Ubiquitin Ligases Required for Skeletal Muscle Atrophy. Science 294: 1704-1708, 2001. 16. Bollinger LM, Witczak CA, Houmard JA, and Brault JJ. SMAD3 augments FoxO3induced MuRF-1 promoter activity in a DNA-binding dependent manner. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2014. 17. Bonaldo P, and Sandri M. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of muscle atrophy. Dis Model Mech 6: 25-39, 2013. 18. Bongers KS, Fox DK, Ebert SM, Kunkel SD, Dyle MC, Bullard SA, Dierdorff JM, and Adams CM. Skeletal muscle denervation causes skeletal muscle atrophy through a pathway that involves both Gadd45a and HDAC4. American journal of physiology Endocrinology and metabolism 305: E907-915, 2013. 19. Bricceno KV, Sampognaro PJ, Van Meerbeke JP, Sumner CJ, Fischbeck KH, and Burnett BG. Histone deacetylase inhibition suppresses myogenin-dependent atrogene activation in spinal muscular atrophy mice. Human Molecular Genetics 2012. 20. Cai D, Frantz JD, Tawa Jr NE, Melendez PA, Oh B-C, Lidov HGW, Hasselgren P-O, Frontera WR, Lee J, Glass DJ, and Shoelson SE. IKKβ/NF-κB Activation Causes Severe Muscle Wasting in Mice. Cell 119: 285-298, 2004. 21. Cardozo T, and Pagano M. The SCF ubiquitin ligase: insights into a molecular machine. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5: 739-751, 2004. 22. Caron AZ, Haroun S, Leblanc E, Trensz F, Guindi C, Amrani A, and Grenier G. The proteasome inhibitor MG132 reduces immobilization-induced skeletal muscle atrophy in mice. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 12: 185, 2011. 23. Carvalho R, Castan E, Coelho C, Lopes F, Almeida F, Michelin A, de Souza R, Araújo J, Cicogna A, and Dal Pai-Silva M. Heart failure increases atrogin-1 and MuRF1 gene expression in skeletal muscle with fiber type-specific atrophy. Journal of Molecular Histology 41: 81-87, 2010. 24. Centner T, Yano J, Kimura E, McElhinny AS, Pelin K, Witt CC, Bang M-L, Trombitas K, Granzier H, Gregorio CC, Sorimachi H, and Labeit S. Identification of muscle specific ring finger proteins as potential regulators of the titin kinase domain. Journal of Molecular Biology 306: 717-726, 2001. 25. Chen Y-W, Gregory CM, Scarborough MT, Shi R, Walter GA, and Vandenborne K. Transcriptional pathways associated with skeletal muscle disuse atrophy in humans. Physiological genomics 31: 510-520, 2007. 26. Chen Y, Cao L, Ye J, and Zhu D. Upregulation of myostatin gene expression in streptozotocin-induced type 1 diabetes mice is attenuated by insulin. Biochemical and biophysical research communications 388: 112-116, 2009. 27. Cho JE, Fournier M, Da X, and Lewis MI. Time course expression of Foxo transcription factors in skeletal muscle following corticosteroid administration. J Appl Physiol 108: 137-145, 2010.

35

833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878

28. Christensen DE, and Klevit RE. Dynamic interactions of proteins in complex networks: identifying the complete set of interacting E2s for functional investigation of E3dependent protein ubiquitination. FEBS Journal 276: 5381-5389, 2009. 29. Clarke BA, Drujan D, Willis MS, Murphy LO, Corpina RA, Burova E, Rakhilin SV, Stitt TN, Patterson C, Latres E, and Glass DJ. The E3 Ligase MuRF1 degrades myosin heavy chain protein in dexamethasone-treated skeletal muscle. Cell Metab 6: 376-385, 2007. 30. Clavel S, Coldefy AS, Kurkdjian E, Salles J, Margaritis I, and Derijard B. Atrophyrelated ubiquitin ligases, atrogin-1 and MuRF1 are up-regulated in aged rat Tibialis Anterior muscle. Mech Ageing Dev 127: 794-801, 2006. 31. Cohen S, Brault JJ, Gygi SP, Glass DJ, Valenzuela DM, Gartner C, Latres E, and Goldberg AL. During muscle atrophy, thick, but not thin, filament components are degraded by MuRF1-dependent ubiquitylation. J Cell Biol 185: 1083-1095, 2009. 32. Cohen S, Zhai B, Gygi SP, and Goldberg AL. Ubiquitylation by Trim32 causes coupled loss of desmin, Z-bands, and thin filaments in muscle atrophy. The Journal of Cell Biology 198: 575-589, 2012. 33. Costelli P, Muscaritoli M, Bossola M, Penna F, Reffo P, Bonetto A, Busquets S, Bonelli G, Lopez-Soriano FJ, Doglietto GB, Argilés JM, Baccino FM, and Fanelli FR. IGF1 is downregulated in experimental cancer cachexia. American Journal of Physiology Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 291: R674-R683, 2006. 34. Davis TA, and Fiorotto ML. Regulation of muscle growth in neonates. Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care 12: 78-85, 2009. 35. de Boer MD, Selby A, Atherton P, Smith K, Seynnes OR, Maganaris CN, Maffulli N, Movin T, Narici MV, and Rennie MJ. The temporal responses of protein synthesis, gene expression and cell signalling in human quadriceps muscle and patellar tendon to disuse. The Journal of physiology 585: 241-251, 2007. 36. Dehoux M, Van Beneden R, Pasko N, Lause P, Verniers J, Underwood L, Ketelslegers JM, and Thissen JP. Role of the insulin-like growth factor I decline in the induction of atrogin-1/MAFbx during fasting and diabetes. Endocrinology 145: 4806-4812, 2004. 37. Dehoux MJM, PM. Induction of MafBx and Murf ubiquitin ligase mRNAs in rat skeletal muscle after LPS injection. FEBS Letters 544: 214-217, 2003. 38. Deshaies RJ, and Joazeiro CA. RING domain E3 ubiquitin ligases. Annu Rev Biochem 78: 399-434, 2009. 39. Doucet M, Russell AP, Leger B, Debigare R, Joanisse DR, Caron MA, LeBlanc P, and Maltais F. Muscle atrophy and hypertrophy signaling in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 176: 261-269, 2007. 40. Doyle A, Zhang G, Abdel Fattah E, Eissa N, and Li Y. Toll-like receptor 4 mediates lipopolysaccharide-induced muscle catabolism via coordinate activation of ubiquitinproteasome and autophagy-lysosome pathways. FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology 25: 99 - 110, 2011. 41. Ebert SM, Dyle MC, Kunkel SD, Bullard SA, Bongers KS, Fox DK, Dierdorff JM, Foster ED, and Adams CM. Stress-induced Skeletal Muscle Gadd45a Expression Reprograms Myonuclei and Causes Muscle Atrophy. Journal of Biological Chemistry 287: 27290-27301, 2012. 36

879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923

42. Edstrom E, Altun M, Hagglund M, and Ulfhake B. Atrogin-1/MAFbx and MuRF1 are downregulated in aging-related loss of skeletal muscle. The journals of gerontology Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences 61: 663-674, 2006. 43. Files DC, D'Alessio FR, Johnston LF, Kesari P, Aggarwal NR, Garibaldi BT, Mock JR, Simmers JL, DeGorordo A, Murdoch J, Willis MS, Patterson C, Tankersley CG, Messi ML, Liu C, Delbono O, Furlow JD, Bodine SC, Cohn RD, King LS, and Crow MT. A Critical Role for Muscle Ring Finger-1 in Acute Lung Injury–associated Skeletal Muscle Wasting. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 185: 825-834, 2012. 44. Fox DK, Ebert SM, Bongers KS, Dyle MC, Bullard SA, Dierdorff JM, Kunkel SD, and Adams CMMP. p53 and ATF4 Mediate Distinct and Additive Pathways to Skeletal Muscle Atrophy During Limb Immobilization. American journal of physiology Endocrinology and metabolism 2014. 45. Frost RA, Nystrom GJ, Jefferson LS, and Lang CH. Hormone, cytokine, and nutritional regulation of sepsis-induced increases in atrogin-1 and MuRF1 in skeletal muscle. American Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology And Metabolism 292: E501-E512, 2007. 46. Furlow JD, Watson ML, Waddell DS, Neff ES, Baehr LM, Ross AP, and Bodine SC. Altered gene expression patterns in muscle ring finger 1 null mice during denervation- and dexamethasone-induced muscle atrophy. Physiological genomics 45: 1168-1185, 2013. 47. Furuyama T, Kitayama K, Yamashita H, and Mori N. Forkhead transcription factor FOXO1 (FKHR)-dependent induction of PDK4 gene expression in skeletal muscle during energy deprivation. The Biochemical journal 375: 365-371, 2003. 48. Gaugler M, Brown A, Merrell E, DiSanto-Rose M, Rathmacher JA, and Reynolds TH. PKB signaling and atrogene expression in skeletal muscle of aged mice. Journal of applied physiology 111: 192-199, 2011. 49. Goldberg AL. Protein Turnover in Skeletal Muscle. Journal of Biological Chemistry 244: 3223-3229, 1969. 50. Gomes AV, Waddell DS, Siu R, Stein M, Dewey S, Furlow JD, and Bodine SC. Upregulation of proteasome activity in muscle RING finger 1-null mice following denervation. FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology 26: 2986-2999, 2012. 51. Gomes MD, Lecker SH, Jagoe RT, Navon A, and Goldberg AL. Atrogin-1, a musclespecific F-box protein highly expressed during muscle atrophy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98: 14440-14445, 2001. 52. Gonçalves DAP, Lira EC, Baviera AM, Cao P, Zanon NM, Arany Z, Bedard N, Tanksale P, Wing SS, Lecker SH, Kettelhut IC, and Navegantes LCC. Mechanisms Involved in 3′,5′-Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate-Mediated Inhibition of the Ubiquitin-Proteasome System in Skeletal Muscle. Endocrinology 150: 5395-5404, 2009. 53. Gonçalves DAP, Silveira WA, Lira EC, Graça FA, Paula-Gomes S, Zanon NM, Kettelhut IC, and Navegantes LCC. Clenbuterol suppresses proteasomal and lysosomal proteolysis and atrophy-related genes in denervated rat soleus muscles independently of Akt. American Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology and Metabolism 302: E123-E133, 2011. 54. Goodman CA, McNally RM, Hoffmann FM, and Hornberger TA. Smad3 Induces Atrogin-1, Inhibits mTOR and Protein Synthesis, and Promotes Muscle Atrophy In Vivo. Molecular Endocrinology 27: 1946-1957, 2013.

37

924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968

55. Granado M, Priego T, Martin AI, Villanua MA, and Lopez-Calderon A. Ghrelin receptor agonist GHRP-2 prevents arthritis-induced increase in E3 ubiquitin-ligating enzymes MuRF1 and MAFbx gene expression in skeletal muscle. American journal of physiology Endocrinology and metabolism 289: E1007-1014, 2005. 56. Gustafsson T, Osterlund T, Flanagan JN, von Waldén F, Trappe TA, Linnehan RM, and Tesch PA. Effects of 3 days unloading on molecular regulators of muscle size in humans. Journal of applied physiology 109: 721-727, 2010. 57. Hanai J, Cao P, Tanksale P, Imamura S, Koshimizu E, Zhao J, Kishi S, Yamashita M, Phillips PS, Sukhatme VP, and Lecker SH. The muscle-specific ubiquitin ligase atrogin-1/MAFbx mediates statin-induced muscle toxicity. J Clin Invest 117: 3940-3951, 2007. 58. Hanson AM, Harrison BC, Young MH, Stodieck LS, and Ferguson VL. Longitudinal characterization of functional, morphologic, and biochemical adaptations in mouse skeletal muscle with hindlimb suspension. Muscle & Nerve 48: 393-402, 2013. 59. Herrera Jr NM, Zimmerman AN, Dykstra DD, and Thompson LV. Clenbuterol in the prevention of muscle atrophy: A study of hindlimb-unweighted rats. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 82: 930-934, 2001. 60. Hirner S, Krohne C, Schuster A, Hoffmann S, Witt S, Erber R, Sticht C, Gasch A, Labeit S, and Labeit D. MuRF1-dependent regulation of systemic carbohydrate metabolism as revealed from transgenic mouse studies. J Mol Biol 379: 666-677, 2008. 61. Hu Z, Wang H, Lee IH, Du J, and Mitch WE. Endogenous glucocorticoids and impaired insulin signaling are both required to stimulate muscle wasting under pathophysiological conditions in mice. The Journal of Clinical Investigation 119: 3059-3069, 2009. 62. Hwee DT, Baehr LM, Philp A, Baar K, and Bodine SC. Maintenance of muscle mass and load-induced growth in Muscle RING Finger 1 null mice with age. Aging cell 13: 92-101, 2014. 63. Hwee DT, Gomes AV, and Bodine SC. Cardiac Proteasome Activity in Muscle Ring Finger-1 Null Mice at Rest and Following Synthetic Glucocorticoid Treatment. American Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology And Metabolism 2011. 64. Jackman RW, Cornwell EW, Wu C-L, and Kandarian SC. Nuclear factor-κB signalling and transcriptional regulation in skeletal muscle atrophy. Experimental physiology 98: 19-24, 2013. 65. Jackman RW, Wu C-L, and Kandarian SC. The ChIP-seq-Defined Networks of Bcl-3 Gene Binding Support Its Required Role in Skeletal Muscle Atrophy. PloS one 7: e51478, 2012. 66. Jagoe RT, Lecker SH, Gomes M, and Goldberg AL. Patterns of gene expression in atrophying skeletal muscles: response to food deprivation. FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology 16: 1697-1712, 2002. 67. Jin J, Cardozo T, Lovering RC, Elledge SJ, Pagano M, and Harper JW. Systematic analysis and nomenclature of mammalian F-box proteins. Genes & development 18: 25732580, 2004. 68. Jogo M, Shiraishi S, and Tamura TA. Identification of MAFbx as a myogeninengaged F-box protein in SCF ubiquitin ligase. FEBS Lett 583: 2715-2719, 2009.

38

969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013

69. Jones SW, Hill RJ, Krasney PA, O'Conner B, Peirce N, and Greenhaff PL. Disuse atrophy and exercise rehabilitation in humans profoundly affects the expression of genes associated with the regulation of skeletal muscle mass. The FASEB Journal 2004. 70. Judge AR, Koncarevic A, Hunter RB, Liou H-C, Jackman RW, and Kandarian SC. Role for IκBα, but not c-Rel, in skeletal muscle atrophy. American Journal of Physiology - Cell Physiology 292: C372-C382, 2007. 71. Kedar V, McDonough H, Arya R, Li H-H, Rockman HA, and Patterson C. Musclespecific RING finger 1 is a bona fide ubiquitin ligase that degrades cardiac troponin I. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101: 1813518140, 2004. 72. Kim HT, Kim KP, Lledias F, Kisselev AF, Scaglione KM, Skowyra D, Gygi SP, and Goldberg AL. Certain Pairs of Ubiquitin-conjugating Enzymes (E2s) and Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases (E3s) Synthesize Nondegradable Forked Ubiquitin Chains Containing All Possible Isopeptide Linkages. Journal of Biological Chemistry 282: 17375-17386, 2007. 73. Kim J, Won KJ, Lee HM, Hwang BY, Bae YM, Choi WS, Song H, Lim KW, Lee CK, and Kim B. p38 MAPK Participates in Muscle-Specific RING Finger 1-Mediated Atrophy in Cast-Immobilized Rat Gastrocnemius Muscle. Korean J Physiol Pharmacol 13: 491-496, 2009. 74. Kline WO, Panaro FJ, Yang H, and Bodine SC. Rapamycin inhibits the growth and muscle-sparing effects of clenbuterol. Journal of applied physiology 102: 740-747, 2007. 75. Koncarevic A, Jackman RW, and Kandarian SC. The ubiquitin-protein ligase Nedd4 targets Notch1 in skeletal muscle and distinguishes the subset of atrophies caused by reduced muscle tension. The FASEB Journal 21: 427-437, 2007. 76. Koyama S, Hata S, Witt CC, Ono Y, Lerche S, Ojima K, Chiba T, Doi N, Kitamura F, Tanaka K, Abe K, Witt SH, Rybin V, Gasch A, Franz T, Labeit S, and Sorimachi H. Muscle RING-Finger Protein-1 (MuRF1) as a Connector of Muscle Energy Metabolism and Protein Synthesis. Journal of Molecular Biology 376: 1224-1236, 2008. 77. Kravtsova-Ivantsiv Y, and Ciechanover A. Non-canonical ubiquitin-based signals for proteasomal degradation. J Cell Sci 125: 539-548, 2012. 78. Krawiec BJ, Frost RA, Vary TC, Jefferson LS, and Lang CH. Hindlimb casting decreases muscle mass in part by proteasome-dependent proteolysis but independent of protein synthesis. American Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology And Metabolism 289: E969-E980, 2005. 79. Kudryashova E, Kudryashov D, Kramerova I, and Spencer MJ. Trim32 is a Ubiquitin Ligase Mutated in Limb Girdle Muscular Dystrophy Type 2H that Binds to Skeletal Muscle Myosin and Ubiquitinates Actin. Journal of Molecular Biology 354: 413-424, 2005. 80. Kudryashova E, Wu J, Havton LA, and Spencer MJ. Deficiency of the E3 ubiquitin ligase TRIM32 in mice leads to a myopathy with a neurogenic component. Human Molecular Genetics 18: 1353-1367, 2009. 81. Kumar A, Bhatnagar S, and Paul PK. TWEAK and TRAF6 regulate skeletal muscle atrophy. Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care 15: 233-239, 2012. 82. Labeit S, Kohl CH, Witt CC, Labeit D, Jung J, and Granzier H. Modulation of muscle atrophy, fatigue and MLC phosphorylation by MuRF1 as indicated by hindlimb suspension studies on MuRF1-KO mice. J Biomed Biotechnol 2010: 693741, 2010.

39

1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057

83. Lagirand-Cantaloube J, Offner N, Csibi A, Leibovitch MP, Batonnet-Pichon S, Tintignac LA, Segura CT, and Leibovitch SA. The initiation factor eIF3-f is a major target for atrogin1/MAFbx function in skeletal muscle atrophy. EMBO J 27: 1266-1276, 2008. 84. Lamothe B, Besse A, Campos AD, Webster WK, Wu H, and Darnay BG. Sitespecific Lys-63-linked Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor-associated Factor 6 Autoubiquitination Is a Critical Determinant of IκB Kinase Activation. Journal of Biological Chemistry 282: 4102-4112, 2007. 85. Lang CH, Huber D, and Frost RA. Burn-induced increase in atrogin-1 and MuRF-1 in skeletal muscle is glucocorticoid independent but downregulated by IGF-I. American Journal of Physiology - Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 292: R328-R336, 2007. 86. Lange S, Xiang F, Yakovenko A, Vihola A, Hackman P, Rostkova E, Kristensen J, Brandmeier B, Franzen G, Hedberg B, Gunnarsson LG, Hughes SM, Marchand S, Sejersen T, Richard I, Edström L, Ehler E, Udd B, and Gautel M. The Kinase Domain of Titin Controls Muscle Gene Expression and Protein Turnover. Science 308: 1599-1603, 2005. 87. Lecker SH, Jagoe RT, Gilbert A, Gomes M, Baracos V, Bailey J, Price SR, Mitch WE, and Goldberg AL. Multiple types of skeletal muscle atrophy involve a common program of changes in gene expression. FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology 18: 39-51, 2004. 88. Lee HK, Rocnik E, Fu Q, Kwon B, Zeng L, Walsh K, and Querfurth H. Foxo/Atrogin induction in human and experimental myositis. Neurobiol Dis 46: 463-475, 2012. 89. Lee SW, Dai G, Hu Z, Wang X, Du J, and Mitch WE. Regulation of Muscle Protein Degradation: Coordinated Control of Apoptotic and Ubiquitin-Proteasome Systems by Phosphatidylinositol 3 Kinase. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 15: 15371545, 2004. 90. Léger B, Senese R, Al-Khodairy AW, Dériaz O, Gobelet C, Giacobino J-P, and Russell AP. Atrogin-1, MuRF1, and FoXO, as well as phosphorylated GSK-3β and 4E-BP1 are reduced in skeletal muscle of chronic spinal cord–injured patients. Muscle & Nerve 40: 69-78, 2009. 91. Léger B, Vergani L, Sorarù G, Hespel P, Derave W, Gobelet C, D'Ascenzio C, Angelini C, and Russell AP. Human skeletal muscle atrophy in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis reveals a reduction in Akt and an increase in atrogin-1. The FASEB Journal 2006. 92. Lemire BB, Debigaré R, Dubé A, Thériault M-E, Côté CH, and Maltais F. MAPK signaling in the quadriceps of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Journal of applied physiology 113: 159-166, 2012. 93. Levine S, Nguyen T, Taylor N, Friscia ME, Budak MT, Rothenberg P, Zhu J, Sachdeva R, Sonnad S, Kaiser LR, Rubinstein NA, Powers SK, and Shrager JB. Rapid disuse atrophy of diaphragm fibers in mechanically ventilated humans. N Engl J Med 358: 1327-1335, 2008. 94. Li HH, Kedar V, Zhang C, McDonough H, Arya R, Wang DZ, and Patterson C. Atrogin-1/muscle atrophy F-box inhibits calcineurin-dependent cardiac hypertrophy by participating in an SCF ubiquitin ligase complex. J Clin Invest 114: 1058-1071, 2004.

40

1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103

95. Li W, Claypool MD, Friera AM, McLaughlin J, Baltgalvis KA, Smith IJ, Kinoshita T, White K, Lang W, Godinez G, Payan DG, and Kinsella TM. Noninvasive imaging of in vivo MuRF1 expression during muscle atrophy. PloS one 9: e94032, 2014. 96. Li Y-P, Chen Y, John J, Moylan J, Jin B, Mann DL, and Reid MB. TNF-α acts via p38 MAPK to stimulate expression of the ubiquitin ligase atrogin1/MAFbx in skeletal muscle. The FASEB Journal 19: 362-370, 2005. 97. Lokireddy S, McFarlane C, Ge X, Zhang H, Sze SK, Sharma M, and Kambadur R. Myostatin Induces Degradation of Sarcomeric Proteins through a Smad3 Signaling Mechanism During Skeletal Muscle Wasting. Molecular Endocrinology 25: 1936-1949, 2011. 98. Lokireddy S, Wijesoma IW, Bonala S, Wei M, Sze SK, McFarlane C, Kambadur R, and Sharma M. Myostatin is a novel tumoral factor that induces cancer cachexia. The Biochemical journal 446: 23-36, 2012. 99. Lokireddy S, Wijesoma IW, Sze SK, McFarlane C, Kambadur R, and Sharma M. Identification of Atrogin-1 targeted proteins during the Myostatin-induced skeletal muscle wasting. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2012. 100. Lomonosova YN, Shenkman BS, and Nemirovskaya TL. Attenuation of unloadinginduced rat soleus atrophy with the heat-shock protein inducer 17-(allylamino)-17demethoxygeldanamycin. The FASEB Journal 2012. 101. Louis E, Raue U, Yang Y, Jemiolo B, and Trappe S. Time course of proteolytic, cytokine, and myostatin gene expression after acute exercise in human skeletal muscle. Journal of applied physiology 103: 1744-1751, 2007. 102. Matern PD, Li N, Hwee DT, Chiamvimonvat N, and Bodine SC. Development of congestive heart failure in mice with a null deletion of MAFbx. The FASEB Journal 24: 1036.1017, 2010. 103. Mayans O, and Labeit S. MuRFs Specialized Members of the TRIM/RBCC Family with Roles in the Regulation of the Trophic State of Muscle and Its Metabolism. In: TRIM/RBCC Proteins, edited by Meroni GSpringer New York, 2012, p. 119-129. 104. McElhinny AS, Kakinuma K, Sorimachi H, Labeit S, and Gregorio CC. Musclespecific RING finger-1 interacts with titin to regulate sarcomeric M-line and thick filament structure and may have nuclear functions via its interaction with glucocorticoid modulatory element binding protein-1. The Journal of Cell Biology 157: 125-136, 2002. 105. McElhinny AS, Perry CN, Witt CC, Labeit S, and Gregorio CC. Muscle-specific RING finger-2 (MURF-2) is important for microtubule, intermediate filament and sarcomeric Mline maintenance in striated muscle development. Journal of Cell Science 117: 3175-3188, 2004. 106. Mendias CL, Gumucio JP, Davis ME, Bromley CW, Davis CS, and Brooks SV. Transforming growth factor-beta induces skeletal muscle atrophy and fibrosis through the induction of atrogin-1 and scleraxis. Muscle & Nerve 45: 55-59, 2012. 107. Metzger MB, Hristova VA, and Weissman AM. HECT and RING finger families of E3 ubiquitin ligases at a glance. Journal of Cell Science 125: 531-537, 2012. 108. Mitch WE, and Goldberg AL. Mechanisms of muscle wasting. The role of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. N Engl J Med 335: 1897-1905, 1996. 109. Mitch WE, Medina R, Grieber S, May RC, England BK, Price SR, Bailey JL, and Goldberg AL. Metabolic acidosis stimulates muscle protein degradation by activating the adenosine triphosphate-dependent pathway involving ubiquitin and proteasomes. The Journal of Clinical Investigation 93: 2127-2133, 1994. 41

1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147

110. Miyazaki M, and Esser KA. Cellular mechanisms regulating protein synthesis and skeletal muscle hypertrophy in animals. Journal of applied physiology 106: 1367-1373, 2009. 111. Moresi V, Williams AH, Meadows E, Flynn JM, Potthoff MJ, McAnally J, Shelton JM, Backs J, Klein WH, Richardson JA, Bassel-Duby R, and Olson EN. Myogenin and class II HDACs control neurogenic muscle atrophy by inducing E3 ubiquitin ligases. Cell 143: 3545, 2010. 112. Mourkioti F, Kratsios P, Luedde T, Song Y-H, Delafontaine P, Adami R, Parente V, Bottinelli R, Pasparakis M, and Rosenthal N. Targeted ablation of IKK2 improves skeletal muscle strength, maintains mass, and promotes regeneration. The Journal of Clinical Investigation 116: 2945-2954, 2006. 113. Moylan JS, Smith JD, Chambers MA, McLoughlin TJ, and Reid MB. TNF induction of atrogin-1/MAFbx mRNA depends on Foxo4 expression but not AKT-Foxo1/3 signaling. American Journal of Physiology - Cell Physiology 295: C986-C993, 2008. 114. Mrosek M, Meier S, Ucurum-Fotiadis Z, von Castelmur E, Hedbom E, Lustig A, Grzesiek S, Labeit D, Labeit S, and Mayans O. Structural Analysis of B-Box 2 from MuRF1: Identification of a Novel Self-Association Pattern in a RING-like Fold†‡. Biochemistry 47: 10722-10730, 2008. 115. Nagpal P, Plant PJ, Correa J, Bain A, Takeda M, Kawabe H, Rotin D, Bain JR, and Batt JA. The ubiquitin ligase Nedd4-1 participates in denervation-induced skeletal muscle atrophy in mice. PloS one 7: e46427, 2012. 116. Napolitano LM, Jaffray EG, Hay RT, and Meroni G. Functional interactions between ubiquitin E2 enzymes and TRIM proteins. The Biochemical journal 434: 309-319, 2011. 117. Navon A, and Ciechanover A. The 26 S Proteasome: From Basic Mechanisms to Drug Targeting. Journal of Biological Chemistry 284: 33713-33718, 2009. 118. Nicolas N, Marazzi G, Kelley K, and Sassoon D. Embryonic deregulation of muscle stress signaling pathways leads to altered postnatal stem cell behavior and a failure in postnatal muscle growth. Developmental Biology 281: 171-183, 2005. 119. Nikawa T, Ishidoh K, Hirasaka K, Ishihara I, Ikemoto M, Kano M, Kominami E, Nonaka I, Ogawa T, Adams GR, Baldwin KM, Yasui N, Kishi K, and Takeda Si. Skeletal muscle gene expression in space-flown rats. The FASEB Journal 2004. 120. Nordquist J, Hoglund AS, Norman H, Tang X, Dworkin B, and Larsson L. Transcription factors in muscle atrophy caused by blocked neuromuscular transmission and muscle unloading in rats. Mol Med 13: 461-470, 2007. 121. Ochala J, Gustafson A-M, Diez ML, Renaud G, Li M, Aare S, Qaisar R, Banduseela VC, Hedström Y, Tang X, Dworkin B, Ford GC, Nair KS, Perera S, Gautel M, and Larsson L. Preferential skeletal muscle myosin loss in response to mechanical silencing in a novel rat intensive care unit model: underlying mechanisms. The Journal of physiology 589: 20072026, 2011. 122. Ogawa T, Furochi H, Mameoka M, Hirasaka K, Onishi Y, Suzue N, Oarada M, Akamatsu M, Akima H, Fukunaga T, Kishi K, Yasui N, Ishidoh K, Fukuoka H, and Nikawa T. Ubiquitin ligase gene expression in healthy volunteers with 20-day bedrest. Muscle & Nerve 34: 463-469, 2006.

42

1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 1193

123. Okamoto T, Torii S, and Machida S. Differential gene expression of muscle-specific ubiquitin ligase MAFbx/Atrogin-1 and MuRF1 in response to immobilization-induced atrophy of slow-twitch and fast-twitch muscles. J Physiol Sci 61: 537-546, 2011. 124. Otis JS, Ashikhmin YI, Brown LA, and Guidot DM. Effect of HIV-1-related protein expression on cardiac and skeletal muscles from transgenic rats. AIDS Res Ther 5: 8, 2008. 125. Otis JS, and Guidot DM. Procysteine Stimulates Expression of Key Anabolic Factors and Reduces Plantaris Atrophy in Alcohol-Fed Rats. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 33: 1450-1459, 2009. 126. Ottenheijm CAC, Heunks LMA, Li Y-P, Jin B, Minnaard R, van Hees HWH, and Dekhuijzen PNR. Activation of the Ubiquitin–Proteasome Pathway in the Diaphragm in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 174: 997-1002, 2006. 127. Passmore LA, and Barford D. Getting into position: the catalytic mechanisms of protein ubiquitylation. The Biochemical journal 379: 513-525, 2004. 128. Paul PK, Bhatnagar S, Mishra V, Srivastava S, Darnay BG, Choi Y, and Kumar A. The E3 ubiquitin ligase TRAF6 intercedes in starvation-induced skeletal muscle atrophy through multiple mechanisms. Molecular and cellular biology 32: 1248-1259, 2012. 129. Paul PK, Gupta SK, Bhatnagar S, Panguluri SK, Darnay BG, Choi Y, and Kumar A. Targeted ablation of TRAF6 inhibits skeletal muscle wasting in mice. The Journal of Cell Biology 191: 1395-1411, 2010. 130. Penna F, Costamagna D, Fanzani A, Bonelli G, Baccino FM, and Costelli P. Muscle wasting and impaired myogenesis in tumor bearing mice are prevented by ERK inhibition. PloS one 5: e13604, 2010. 131. Perera S, Mankoo B, and Gautel M. Developmental regulation of MURF E3 ubiquitin ligases in skeletal muscle. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 2012. 132. Perrini S, Laviola L, Carreira MC, Cignarelli A, Natalicchio A, and Giorgino F. The GH/IGF1 axis and signaling pathways in the muscle and bone: mechanisms underlying age-related skeletal muscle wasting and osteoporosis. Journal of Endocrinology 205: 201210, 2010. 133. Petersen AMW, Magkos F, Atherton P, Selby A, Smith K, Rennie MJ, Pedersen BK, and Mittendorfer B. Smoking impairs muscle protein synthesis and increases the expression of myostatin and MAFbx in muscle. American Journal of Physiology Endocrinology And Metabolism 293: E843-E848, 2007. 134. Petroski MD, and Deshaies RJ. Function and regulation of cullin-RING ubiquitin ligases. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6: 9-20, 2005. 135. Pizon V, Iakovenko A, van der Ven PFM, Kelly R, Fatu C, Fürst DO, Karsenti E, and Gautel M. Transient association of titin and myosin with microtubules in nascent myofibrils directed by the MURF2 RING-finger protein. Journal of Cell Science 115: 44694482, 2002. 136. Plant PJ, Brooks D, Faughnan M, Bayley T, Bain J, Singer L, Correa J, Pearce D, Binnie M, and Batt J. Cellular markers of muscle atrophy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 42: 461-471, 2010. 137. Polge C, Heng A-E, Jarzaguet M, Ventadour S, Claustre A, Combaret L, Béchet D, Matondo M, Uttenweiler-Joseph S, Monsarrat B, Attaix D, and Taillandier D. Muscle actin is polyubiquitinylated in vitro and in vivo and targeted for breakdown by the E3 ligase MuRF1. The FASEB Journal 2011. 43

1194 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 1200 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1216 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1223 1224 1225 1226 1227 1228 1229 1230 1231 1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237

138. Porporato PE, Filigheddu N, Reano S, Ferrara M, Angelino E, Gnocchi VF, Prodam F, Ronchi G, Fagoonee S, Fornaro M, Chianale F, Baldanzi G, Surico N, Sinigaglia F, Perroteau I, Smith RG, Sun Y, Geuna S, and Graziani A. Acylated and unacylated ghrelin impair skeletal muscle atrophy in mice. The Journal of Clinical Investigation 123: 611-622, 2013. 139. Portbury AL, Ronnebaum SM, Zungu M, Patterson C, and Willis MS. Back to your heart: Ubiquitin proteasome system-regulated signal transduction. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology 52: 526-537, 2012. 140. Price SR, Bailey JL, Wang X, Jurkovitz C, England BK, Ding X, Phillips LS, and Mitch WE. Muscle wasting in insulinopenic rats results from activation of the ATPdependent, ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway by a mechanism including gene transcription. The Journal of Clinical Investigation 98: 1703-1708, 1996. 141. Pruznak AM, Hong-Brown L, Lantry R, She P, Frost RA, Vary TC, and Lang CH. Skeletal and cardiac myopathy in HIV-1 transgenic rats. American journal of physiology Endocrinology and metabolism 295: E964-973, 2008. 142. Raue U, Slivka D, Jemiolo B, Hollon C, and Trappe S. Proteolytic Gene Expression Differs At Rest and After Resistance Exercise Between Young and Old Women. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 62: 1407-1412, 2007. 143. Reed SA, Sandesara PB, Senf SM, and Judge AR. Inhibition of FoxO transcriptional activity prevents muscle fiber atrophy during cachexia and induces hypertrophy. FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology 26: 987-1000, 2012. 144. Rhoads MG, Kandarian SC, Pacelli F, Doglietto GB, and Bossola M. Expression of NF-κB and IκB proteins in skeletal muscle of gastric cancer patients. European Journal of Cancer 46: 191-197, 2010. 145. Rubel C, Schisler J, Hamlett E, DeKroon R, Gautel M, Alzate O, and Patterson C. Diggin′ on U(biquitin): A Novel Method for the Identification of Physiological E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Substrates. Cell Biochem Biophys 67: 127-138, 2013. 146. Sacheck JM, Hyatt J-PK, Raffaello A, Jagoe RT, Roy RR, Edgerton VR, Lecker SH, and Goldberg AL. Rapid disuse and denervation atrophy involve transcriptional changes similar to those of muscle wasting during systemic diseases. The FASEB Journal 21: 140155, 2007. 147. Salanova M, Schiffl G, Püttmann B, Schoser BG, and Blottner D. Molecular biomarkers monitoring human skeletal muscle fibres and microvasculature following longterm bed rest with and without countermeasures. Journal of Anatomy 212: 306-318, 2008. 148. Sandri M, Sandri C, Gilbert A, Skurk C, Calabria E, Picard A, Walsh K, Schiaffino S, Lecker SH, and Goldberg AL. Foxo transcription factors induce the atrophy-related ubiquitin ligase atrogin-1 and cause skeletal muscle atrophy. Cell 117: 399-412, 2004. 149. Sartori R, Milan G, Patron M, Mammucari C, Blaauw B, Abraham R, and Sandri M. Smad2 and 3 transcription factors control muscle mass in adulthood. American Journal of Physiology - Cell Physiology 296: C1248-C1257, 2009. 150. Sartori R, Schirwis E, Blaauw B, Bortolanza S, Zhao J, Enzo E, Stantzou A, Mouisel E, Toniolo L, Ferry A, Stricker S, Goldberg AL, Dupont S, Piccolo S, Amthor H, and Sandri M. BMP signaling controls muscle mass. Nature genetics 2013.

44

1238 1239 1240 1241 1242 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277 1278 1279 1280 1281 1282 1283

151. Sato S, Ogura Y, and Kumar A. TWEAK/Fn14 signaling axis mediates skeletal muscle atrophy and metabolic dysfunction. Frontiers in Immunology 5: 2014. 152. Schoser BGH, Frosk P, Engel AG, Klutzny U, Lochmüller H, and Wrogemann K. Commonality of TRIM32 mutation in causing sarcotubular myopathy and LGMD2H. Annals of Neurology 57: 591-595, 2005. 153. Schwartz AL, and Ciechanover A. Targeting proteins for destruction by the ubiquitin system: implications for human pathobiology. Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology 49: 73-96, 2009. 154. Senf SM, Dodd SL, and Judge AR. FOXO signaling is required for disuse muscle atrophy and is directly regulated by Hsp70. American Journal of Physiology - Cell Physiology 298: C38-C45, 2009. 155. Senf SM, Dodd SL, McClung JM, and Judge AR. Hsp70 overexpression inhibits NFκB and Foxo3a transcriptional activities and prevents skeletal muscle atrophy. The FASEB Journal 22: 3836-3845, 2008. 156. Sheriff S, Joshi R, Friend LA, James JH, and Balasubramaniam A. Ghrelin receptor agonist, GHRP-2, attenuates burn injury-induced MuRF-1 and MAFbx expression and muscle proteolysis in rats. Peptides 30: 1909-1913, 2009. 157. Shimizu N, Yoshikawa N, Ito N, Maruyama T, Suzuki Y, Takeda S-i, Nakae J, Tagata Y, Nishitani S, Takehana K, Sano M, Fukuda K, Suematsu M, Morimoto C, and Tanaka H. Crosstalk between Glucocorticoid Receptor and Nutritional Sensor mTOR in Skeletal Muscle. Cell Metabolism 13: 170-182, 2011. 158. Siddiqui RA, Hassan S, Harvey KA, Rasool T, Das T, Mukerji P, and DeMichele S. Attenuation of proteolysis and muscle wasting by curcumin c3 complex in MAC16 colon tumour-bearing mice. The British journal of nutrition 102: 967-975, 2009. 159. Skaar JR, Pagan JK, and Pagano M. Mechanisms and function of substrate recruitment by F-box proteins. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 14: 369-381, 2013. 160. Skowyra D, Craig KL, Tyers M, Elledge SJ, and Harper JW. F-Box Proteins Are Receptors that Recruit Phosphorylated Substrates to the SCF Ubiquitin-Ligase Complex. Cell 91: 209-219, 1997. 161. Slimani L, Micol D, Amat J, Delcros G, Meunier B, Taillandier D, Polge C, Béchet D, Dardevet D, Picard B, Attaix D, Listrat A, and Combaret L. The worsening of tibialis anterior muscle atrophy during recovery post-immobilization correlates with enhanced connective tissue area, proteolysis, and apoptosis. American Journal of Physiology Endocrinology and Metabolism 303: E1335-E1347, 2012. 162. Sneddon AA, Delday MI, and Maltin CA. Amelioration of denervation-induced atrophy by clenbuterol is associated with increased PKC-α activity. American Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology and Metabolism 279: E188-E195, 2000. 163. Solomon V, Baracos V, Sarraf P, and Goldberg AL. Rates of ubiquitin conjugation increase when muscles atrophy, largely through activation of the N-end rule pathway. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 95: 12602-12607, 1998. 164. Solomon V, Lecker SH, and Goldberg AL. The N-end Rule Pathway Catalyzes a Major Fraction of the Protein Degradation in Skeletal Muscle. Journal of Biological Chemistry 273: 25216-25222, 1998. 165. Spencer JA, Eliazer S, Ilaria RL, Richardson JA, and Olson EN. Regulation of Microtubule Dynamics and Myogenic Differentiation by Murf, a Striated Muscle Ring-Finger Protein. The Journal of Cell Biology 150: 771-784, 2000. 45

1284 1285 1286 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 1295 1296 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 1306 1307 1308 1309 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328

166. Stevenson EJ, Giresi PG, Koncarevic A, and Kandarian SC. Global analysis of gene expression patterns during disuse atrophy in rat skeletal muscle. The Journal of physiology 551: 33-48, 2003. 167. Stitt TN, Drujan D, Clarke BA, Panaro F, Timofeyva Y, Kline WO, Gonzalez M, Yancopoulos GD, and Glass DJ. The IGF-1/PI3K/Akt pathway prevents expression of muscle atrophy-induced ubiquitin ligases by inhibiting FOXO transcription factors. Mol Cell 14: 395-403, 2004. 168. Tang H, Lee M, Khuong A, Wright E, and Shrager JB. Diaphragm muscle atrophy in the mouse after long-term mechanical ventilation. Muscle & Nerve 48: 272-278, 2013. 169. Testelmans D, Crul T, Maes K, Agten A, Crombach M, Decramer M, and GayanRamirez G. Atrophy and hypertrophy signalling in the diaphragm of patients with COPD. European Respiratory Journal 35: 549-556, 2010. 170. Theije CCd, Langen RCJ, Lamers WH, Schols AMWJ, and Köhler SE. Distinct responses of protein turnover regulatory pathways in hypoxia- and semistarvationinduced muscle atrophy. American Journal of Physiology - Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology 305: L82-L91, 2013. 171. Tintignac LA, Lagirand J, Batonnet S, Sirri V, Leibovitch MP, and Leibovitch SA. Degradation of MyoD Mediated by the SCF (MAFbx) Ubiquitin Ligase. Journal of Biological Chemistry 280: 2847-2856, 2005. 172. Urso ML, Chen YW, Scrimgeour AG, Lee PC, Lee KF, and Clarkson PM. Alterations in mRNA expression and protein products following spinal cord injury in humans. The Journal of physiology 579: 877-892, 2007. 173. Urso ML, Scrimgeour AG, Chen YW, Thompson PD, and Clarkson PM. Analysis of human skeletal muscle after 48 h immobilization reveals alterations in mRNA and protein for extracellular matrix components. Journal of applied physiology 101: 1136-1148, 2006. 174. Van Gammeren D, Damrauer JS, Jackman RW, and Kandarian SC. The IκB kinases IKKα and IKKβ are necessary and sufficient for skeletal muscle atrophy. The FASEB Journal 23: 362-370, 2009. 175. Vary TC, Frost RA, and Lang CH. Acute alcohol intoxication increases atrogin-1 and MuRF1 mRNA without increasing proteolysis in skeletal muscle. American Journal of Physiology - Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 294: R1777-R1789, 2008. 176. Wada S, Kato Y, Okutsu M, Miyaki S, Suzuki K, Yan Z, Schiaffino S, Asahara H, Ushida T, and Akimoto T. Translational Suppression of Atrophic Regulators by MicroRNA23a Integrates Resistance to Skeletal Muscle Atrophy. Journal of Biological Chemistry 286: 38456-38465, 2011. 177. Waddell DS, Baehr LM, van den Brandt J, Johnsen SA, Reichardt HM, Furlow JD, and Bodine SC. The glucocorticoid receptor and FOXO1 synergistically activate the skeletal muscle atrophy-associated MuRF1 gene. American journal of physiology Endocrinology and metabolism 295: E785-797, 2008. 178. Wang X, Blagden C, Fan J, Nowak SJ, Taniuchi I, Littman DR, and Burden SJ. Runx1 prevents wasting, myofibrillar disorganization, and autophagy of skeletal muscle. Genes & development 19: 1715-1722, 2005. 179. Wang X, Hu Z, Hu J, Du J, and Mitch WE. Insulin Resistance Accelerates Muscle Protein Degradation: Activation of the Ubiquitin-Proteasome Pathway by Defects in Muscle Cell Signaling. Endocrinology 147: 4160-4168, 2006.

46

1329 1330 1331 1332 1333 1334 1335 1336 1337 1338 1339 1340 1341 1342 1343 1344 1345 1346 1347 1348 1349 1350 1351 1352 1353 1354 1355 1356 1357 1358 1359 1360 1361 1362 1363 1364 1365 1366 1367 1368 1369 1370 1371 1372 1373

180. Watson ML, Baehr LM, Reichardt HM, Tuckermann JP, Bodine SC, and Furlow JD. A Cell Autonomous Role for the Glucocorticoid Receptor in Skeletal Muscle Atrophy Induced by Systemic Glucocorticoid Exposure. American journal of physiology Endocrinology and metabolism 2012. 181. Willis MS, Bevilacqua A, Pulinilkunnil T, Kienesberger P, Tannu M, and Patterson C. The role of ubiquitin ligases in cardiac disease. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology. 182. Willis MS, Ike C, Li L, Wang D-Z, Glass DJ, and Patterson C. Muscle Ring Finger 1, but not Muscle Ring Finger 2, Regulates Cardiac Hypertrophy In Vivo. Circulation Research 100: 456-459, 2007. 183. Wing SS, and Goldberg AL. Glucocorticoids activate the ATP-ubiquitin-dependent proteolytic system in skeletal muscle during fasting. American journal of physiology Endocrinology and metabolism 264: E668-676, 1993. 184. Witt SH, Granzier H, Witt CC, and Labeit S. MURF-1 and MURF-2 target a specific subset of myofibrillar proteins redundantly: towards understanding MURF-dependent muscle ubiquitination. J Mol Biol 350: 713-722, 2005. 185. Wray CJ, Mammen JM, Hershko DD, and Hasselgren PO. Sepsis upregulates the gene expression of multiple ubiquitin ligases in skeletal muscle. The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology 35: 698-705, 2003. 186. Wu CL, Kandarian SC, and Jackman RW. Identification of genes that elicit disuse muscle atrophy via the transcription factors p50 and Bcl-3. PloS one 6: e16171, 2011. 187. Wu Y, Zhao W, Zhao J, Zhang Y, Qin W, Pan J, Bauman WA, Blitzer RD, and Cardozo C. REDD1 Is a Major Target of Testosterone Action in Preventing DexamethasoneInduced Muscle Loss. Endocrinology 151: 1050-1059, 2010. 188. Yamamoto D, Maki T, Herningtyas EH, Ikeshita N, Shibahara H, Sugiyama Y, Nakanishi S, Iida K, Iguchi G, Takahashi Y, Kaji H, Chihara K, and Okimura Y. Branched-chain amino acids protect against dexamethasone-induced soleus muscle atrophy in rats. Muscle & Nerve 41: 819-827, 2010. 189. Yang W-L, Wang J, Chan C-H, Lee S-W, Campos AD, Lamothe B, Hur L, Grabiner BC, Lin X, Darnay BG, and Lin H-K. The E3 Ligase TRAF6 Regulates Akt Ubiquitination and Activation. Science 325: 1134-1138, 2009. 190. Yang Y, Jemiolo B, and Trappe S. Proteolytic mRNA expression in response to acute resistance exercise in human single skeletal muscle fibers. Journal of applied physiology 101: 1442-1450, 2006. 191. Yin HN, Chai JK, Yu YM, Shen CA, Wu YQ, Yao YM, Liu H, Liang LM, Tompkins RG, and Sheng ZY. Regulation of signaling pathways downstream of IGF-I/insulin by androgen in skeletal muscle of glucocorticoid-treated rats. The Journal of trauma 66: 10831090, 2009. 192. Zaglia T, Milan G, Ruhs A, Franzoso M, Bertaggia E, Pianca N, Carpi A, Carullo P, Pesce P, Sacerdoti D, Sarais C, Catalucci D, Kr, xFc, ger M, Mongillo M, and Sandri M. Atrogin-1 deficiency promotes cardiomyopathy and premature death via impaired autophagy. The Journal of Clinical Investigation 124: 2410-2424, 2014. 193. Zeman RJ, Zhao J, Zhang Y, Zhao W, Wen X, Wu Y, Pan J, Bauman WA, and Cardozo C. Differential skeletal muscle gene expression after upper or lower motor neuron transection. Pflugers Arch 458: 525-535, 2009.

47

1374 1375 1376 1377 1378 1379 1380 1381 1382 1383 1384

194. Zhang G, Jin B, and Li YP. C/EBPbeta mediates tumour-induced ubiquitin ligase atrogin1/MAFbx upregulation and muscle wasting. EMBO J 30: 4323-4335, 2011. 195. Zhang G, and Li Y-P. p38beta MAPK upregulates atrogin1/MAFbx by specific phosphorylation of C/EBPbeta. Skeletal Muscle 2: 20, 2012. 196. Zhao W, Pan J, Zhao Z, Wu Y, Bauman WA, and Cardozo CP. Testosterone protects against dexamethasone-induced muscle atrophy, protein degradation and MAFbx upregulation. The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology 110: 125-129, 2008. 197. Zhu E, Sassoon CSH, Nelson R, Pham HT, Zhu L, Baker MJ, and Caiozzo VJ. Early effects of mechanical ventilation on isotonic contractile properties and MAF-box gene expression in the diaphragm. Journal of applied physiology 99: 747-756, 2005.

1385 1386

Figure Legends

1387 1388

Figure 1: Regulation of MuRF1 and MAFbx Expression in Skeletal Muscle.

1389

Skeletal muscle atrophy is induced by a number of stressors as illustrated in this figure. These

1390

stressors can lead to the increase in the expression of a number of transcription factors, including

1391

the forkhead transcription factors (FOXO1 and FOX03a), NF-κB transcription factors (p65, c-

1392

Rel, RelB, p52, p50), C/EBP, KLF-15 and/or activation of the glucocorticoid receptor. These

1393

transcriptional mediators can bind to the promoter regions of either the MuRF1 or MAFbx genes

1394

leading to an increase in their expression levels within the muscle. A schematic of the putative

1395

domain structure of each protein is shown. MuRF1 contains a RING-Finger domain (RING), a

1396

MuRF1 family conserved domain MFC), a B-box domain (B-Box), coiled coil domains (CC),

1397

and an acidic tail region (AR). MAFbx contains two nuclear localization signals (NLS), a

1398

leucine-zipper domain (LZ), a leucine-charged residue rich domain (LCD), an F-box domain (F-

1399

box), and a PDZ domain (PDZ).

1400 1401

Figure 2: The Ubiquitin-Proteasome Pathway.

48

1402

The process of ubiquitination is controlled by the ubiquitin-activating enzymes (E1), ubiquitin-

1403

conjugating enzymes (E2) and ubiquitin-protein ligases (E3). MuRF1 and MAFbx are both E3

1404

ubiquitin ligases that control the ubiquitination of specific substrates. Ubiquitin can be added to a

1405

substrate as a single monomer on one (monoubiquitination) or more lysines (multiubiquitination)

1406

or as a chain of ubiquitins of variable length on a single lysine (polyubiquitination). The model

1407

of ubiquitination can lead to different substrate fates. Polyubiquitination of a substrate with a

1408

ubiquitin chain using K11 or K48 linkages generally results in proteasomal degradation, while,

1409

ubiquitin chains using K63 linkages can lead to alterations in signaling or endocytosis.

1410 1411

Figure 3: Phenotype of MuRF1 Null (KO) Mice.

1412

The major differences in the response of the MuRF1 KO mice relative to wild type mice are

1413

highlighted for glucocorticoid treatment, denervation, and aging (18-24 months old). A common

1414

phenotype of all of the models is muscle sparing.

1415 1416 1417 1418 1419 1420 1421 1422

49

1423 1424 1425

50

1426

Table 1. Atrophy models that have shown MuRF1 and MAFbx to be upregulated

Model

Gene

Species

Reference

Fasting

MAFbx MuRF1 and MAFbx

Mouse Mouse

(36, 51, 66) (3, 87, 111)

Glucocorticoids

MuRF1 and MAFbx MuRF1 MAFbx MuRF1 and MAFbx

Mouse Rat Rat Rat

(7, 15, 176) (4, 187) (188) (196) (191)

Denervation

MuRF1 and MAFbx MuRF1 and MAFbx

Mouse Rat

(15, 111, 146) (193)

MuRF1 and MAFbx MuRF1 and MAFbx MuRF1 and MAFbx

Mouse Rat Human

(146) (193) (172)

Hindlimb Suspension

MuRF1 and MAFbx MuRF1 and MAFbx

Mouse Rat

(15, 58) (100)

Immobilization

MuRF1 and MAFbx MuRF1 MAFbx MuRF1 and MAFbx MuRF1 MAFbx MuRF1 and MAFbx

Mouse Rat Rat Rat Human Human Human

(15, 22, 123) (73) (166) (11, 78) (35) (69) (25, 56)

Bedrest

MAFbx

Human

(122)

ICU mimic

MuRF1 and MAFbx

Rat

(120)

MuRF1 and MAFbx MAFbx MuRF1 and MAFbx

Mouse Rabbit Human

(168) (197) (93)

MuRF1 and MAFbx

Mouse

(87)

Spinal Cord Transection

Mechanical Ventilation

Chronic Kidney Disease

51

Diabetes

MAFbx MuRF1 and MAFbx MAFbx

Mouse Mouse Rat

(26, 36, 61) (87, 179) (89)

Sepsis

MuRF1, MAFbx

Rat

(45, 185)

LPS Injection

MuRF1 and MAFbx MuRF1 and MAFbx

Mouse Rat

(40) (37)

Cachexia

MAFbx MuRF1 and MAFbx MuRF1 and MAFbx

Mouse Mouse Rat

(130) (6, 87, 98, 158) (33)

HIV

MAFbx

Rat

(124, 141)

COPD

MAFbx MuRF1 and MAFbx

Human Human

(92, 126, 136, 169) (39)

Aging

MuRF1 MuRF1 and MAFbx MuRF1

Rat Rat Human

(5) (30) (142)

ALS

MAFbx

Human

(91)

Alcohol

MuRF1 and MAFbx

Rat

(125, 175)

Spinal Muscular Atrophy

MuRF1 and MAFbx

Mouse and Human

(19)

Heart Failure

MuRF1 and MAFbx

Rat

(23)

Space Flight

MAFbx MuRF1

Mouse Rat

(2) (119)

Thermal Injury

MuRF1 and MAFbx

Rat

(85, 156)

MuRF1 MAFbx MuRF1 and MAFbx

Mouse Mouse Mouse

(1) (96, 106) (15)

MAFbx

Human

(133)

Inflammatory Cytokines

Smoking

52

1427 1428

List of

1429

atrophy

1430

models in

1431

which

1432

MuRF1

1433

and/or

1434

Myositis

MAFbx

Human

(88)

Acute Lung Injury

MuRF1, MAFbx

Mouse

(43)

Statins

MAFbx

Humans

(57)

Arthritis

MuRF1, MAFbx

Rat

(55)

Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

MuRF1, MAFbx

Human

(14)

Hypoxia

MuRF1, MAFbx

Mouse

(170)

Knee Arthroplasty

MuRF1, MAFbx

Human

(9)

MAFbx

1435

have been

1436

shown to be upregulated.

1437 1438

53

1439 1440

Table 2: Phenotype of MuRF1 and MAFbx Knock Out Mice

Postnatal (0 to 2 months) ADULT (2 to 18 months)

Aging (> 18 months)

MuRF1 KO

MAFbx KO

Normal Growth (15)

Normal Growth (15)

Elevated HIF-1 Increased capillary density Elevated glycolytic enzymes (GS, PFK, PDH) Reduced ER Stress (62)

Normal Life Span (62)

Die at 16-18 months of congestive heart failure (102, 192)

Normal growth response to Increased Loading (62)

1441 1442 1443 1444

Atrophy ModelsMuscle Sparing

Denervation (15, 50) Unloading (82) Glucocorticoids (7) Acute Lung Injury Aging (43)

Denervation (15, 50) Immobilization (unpublished)

Load-Induced Hypertrophy

Normal Growth (8, 63)

Attenuated Growth (8)

Characteristics of skeletal muscle in MuRF1 and MAFbx knock out mice at various life stages and in response to various atrophy and hypertrophy challenges.

54

Neural Inactivity

Stressors

Malnutrition

Unloading Oxidative Stress

Glucocorticoids Inflammation/Cytokines

FOXO1/FOXO3a, NF-ΚB, C/EBP β, KLF15, Smad 3, Glucocorticoid Receptor

Transcriptional Mediators Triggers

SCF E3 Ligase

Muscle Atrophy

PDZ  

NLS  

F-­‐Box  

LCD  

NLS  

AR    

CC  

CC  

B-­‐Box    

MFC    

RING    

Monomeric E3 Ligase

LZ  

MAFbx

MuRF1

E1 Ub + ATP

AMP + PPi Substrate

E2

Substrate

Skp1

Ub

RING

F box

Cul1

MuRF1

MAFbx

RBX

Substrate

Substrate

Skp1

RING

Ub

Cul1

E2

F box E2

RBX

Ub

Ub

Substrate Ub Ub Substrate

Ub

Substrate Monoubiquitination

Ub

Ub

Substrate

Ub

Polyubiquitination

Multimonoubiquitination

DNA Repair Gene Expression Endocytosis

Ub

K48 K29

K63 Receptor Endocytosis Signal Transduction Kinase Activation Endocytosis

Protein degraded into peptides

26S Proteasome

Glucocor'coid  Treatment  

Denervation Suppression of Selective Genes: USP14, USP19, Nedd4, HDAC4, embryonic AchR and other neuromuscular junction associated genes

No suppression of MAFbx Suppression of FOXO1/3a Expression Suppression of Selective Genes involved in Fat Storage, Insulin Action

Muscle Sparing Lower ER Stress

Increased Proteasome Activity Upregulation of MAFbx

Maintenance of Protein Synthesis

Prevention of Anabolic Resistance

Aging Figure  3  

Suggest Documents