SLAC-PUB-1205 (E) March 1973 THE ... - Stanford University

6 downloads 5795 Views 1MB Size Report
“fPhysics Department, California State College, San Bernardino,. California 92407, USA. TtDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Hawaii, Honolulu ...
SLAC-PUB-1205 (E) March 1973 THE REACTION 3/p - 7;tn-lr+s-p AT HIGH ENERGY AND PHOTON DISSOCIATION INTO 4 PIONS*

M. Davier, I. Derado, ** D. E. C. Fries,*** F. F. Liu, 7 R. F. Mozley, A. Odian, J. Park, ** W. P. Swanson, F. Villa, and D. Yountlt Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305

ABSTRACT The reaction yp - l;‘n-l;‘~~-p 2-meter beam.

streamer

has been studied using the SLAC

chamber placed in an 18-GeV bremsstrahlung

We find evidence for a broad enhancement (p* ) in the 47r

mass spectrum at a mass of 1620 MeV with a width of about 300 MeV. This state is produced peripherally with being energy independent.

with a cross section consistent

I-spin = 1 (C=-1) is deduced from the

dominant pm decay mode and JfO from the observation zation phenomenon. helicity 3

Assuming quantum numbers Jp= l-,

is conserved at the y-p’

vertex.

Further

of a polaris -channel

support for the

assignment is gathered when comparing our results to data from

e+e- colliding-beam

experiments.

*Work supported in part by the U. S. Atomic Energy Commission. **Max Planck Institut fiir Physik und Astrophysik, ***Institut

fiir Experimentelle

Kernphysik,

“fPhysics Department, California California 92407, USA.

Karlsruhe,

State College,

TtDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Hawaii 96822, USA.

Munich, Germany. Germany.

San Bernardino,

University

of Hawaii,

(Submitted to Nucl. Phys. )

Honolulu,

I

Introduction A well-known

feature of the photon interacting

Indeed, for hadronic masses up to

coupling to the neutral vector mesons. 1 GeV, the low-lying action.

However,

mesons,

p”,

with hadrons is its strong

w and Cp essentially

dominate the inter-

there is no such clear picture for higher masses.

evidence from the e+e- colliding-beam

experiments

There is

at Frascati 1) that multi-

pion final states are copiously produced in the mass range from 1.4 to 2.4 GeV. Obviously the study of the photon coupling to hadronic

states of high mass is

quite fundamental since it could reveal new vector mesons or show interactions no longer mediated by vector mesons. A direct way of studying the Jp = l- hadronic spectrum is the e+e- annihilation process through one-photon exchange (fig. la). is through diffractive

photoproduction

another approach

with real photons:

(hadrons) + p

YP-

However,

,

where the hadrons connected to the photon will appear at high energy and small momentum transfer

(fig. lb).

While the r’n-

hadronic state has already been

studied extensively 2,3) with no convincing evidence for an isovector

vector

meson of mass higher than 1 GeV, searches in the higher multiplicity have been almost nonexistent. photoproduction

In this paper we present such a search in the

of four charged pions: YP-

Preliminary

states

analyses of a limited

fn+n-7r7rp fraction

.

(1)

of our data have already been

presented 495) . The present work is based on the complete data of our experiment.

Recently new results have become available on this reaction

from the Berkeley-SLAC

bubble chamber collaboration 6) , showing good agree-

ment with our findings. -2-

Characteristics The two-meter bremsstrahlung

SLAC streamer

of the Data

chamber was exposed to an 18 GeV

beam and data were taken under a very loose trigger.

on our experimental

technique and the analysis procedures

Details

may be found

elsewhere7). Our sample for reaction

(1) amounts to 1667 events from photon energies

between 4.5 and 18 GeV, where the lower energy cutoff is imposed by the falloff of our geometrical been previously

acceptance.

General features of reaction phase-space method 8) .

studied with the longitudinal

We find that reaction

(1) have

(1) is strongly dominated by p” and A*

as seen in figs. 2a, 2b and 3a, 3b; the effect is particularly

production

clear at the highest

energies we have studied (figs. 2b and 3b). Above Ey = 10 GeV such production accounts for about 70% of the complete channel. We have fitted the fractions ++ using handdrawn background curves in order to study the energy p” and A dependence of the various subchannels.

Figure 4 and table 1 give the energy

dependence of the cross sections for reaction YP -

o+PTTP

YP-

+---IirnnA

o--HYP --pnA Since we are interested

(1) and the following reactions:

,

(2)

, .

at high energy, where we primarily

phenomenon, the A* Therefore

(4)

in the photon coupling to the 47r system we wish to

remove events produced by exchange processes, Fortunately

(3)

such as reaction

look for a diffractive

peak is very clear with a relatively

small background.

we do not bias the 4n system too severely by removing

a pi? mass combination

in the A*

band (1.16 - 1.32 GeV) . -3-

(3).

events with

of

The 4-Pion Mass Spectrum Figure 5a shows the 47r mass distribution

for all events above Er = 6 GeV

where some peaking is apparent around 1.6 GeV. When events with A* removed (fig. 5b) the effect appears as a more prominent

are

broad peak centered

at about 1.6 GeV. Since about half of the events with no A* to look for a correlation

contain a p”,

between the 2n and 47r mass distributions.

done in fig. 6 where it is seen that a large fraction to the 4n bump.

Conversely,

7~+7r-combination

in the p” band (0.68 - 0.84 GeV).

p07r+n- mass distribution

it is interesting This is

of the produced p” contribute

almost all the events in the 4n peak have one Figure 5c then shows the

where the peak at 1.6 GeV is now very clear.

To study the behavior of our results as a function of incident energy, we divide our sample into two energy bins, Ey = 6 - 12 GeV and 12 - 18 GeV.

We

see the enhancement in both cases, but the effect is more apparent in the highenergy sample since more phase-space is available in this case (figs. 7a and 7c).

On the other hand, if we require

that no p” be produced there is no evi-

dence for an excess of events, thus confirming

the strong correlation

(figs. 7b

and 7d). To ascertain whether we are seeing a genuine effect produced by the p” cut, we have generated “peripheral”

not artificially phase-space Monte

Carlo events with exponential falloff in pion transverse-momenta and in momentum transfer

to the proton.

squared 9)

These events have been subjected to

the same cuts we have applied to the real data.

We are unable to reproduce

the 4n peak at 1.6 GeV whereas the higher mass part of the 4n mass distribution is well reproduced distribution

(solid line in figs. 7a, 7~).

with no p” is well described -4-

Furthermore,

the 47~mass

(solid lines in figs. 7b, 7d). We take

this as evidence that the enhancement in the p”n+7r- system is not a kinematical reflection

of other gross features of data, nor is it an artifact

generated by the

cuts. Using the Monte Carlo generated events to determine background,

the shape of the

we have fitted the 4n mass spectrum to a nonrelativistic

Wigner form in order to determine

the parameters

of the peak.

Breit-

The values

we have found for the mass and width are shown in table 2 for the two E Y selections considered: the values agree well between the two bins, although the width is rather poorly determined

in both.

To compute cross sections we

have fitted the distributions simultaneously

in the ranges E = 6 - 12 GeV and 12 - 18 GeV Y using the same mass and width. The results are

a)

apparent mass M = (1620 f 30) MeV and width I’ = (310 f 70) MeV

b)

a cross section roughly energy independent* (0.85*0.3)pbforEy=6-12GeV (0.95 zt 0.3) pb for Ey= 12-18 GeV.

*The cross section values, extrapolating

corrected by using the observed t-dependence and

at t=O - averaging over M(47r) and E - are Y (1.23 5 0.43) pb for 6 < Ey < 12 GeV (1.07 rt 0.34) pb

for

12 < Ey < 18 GeV

These values are used in the last section for the discussion on coupling constants. Although the fitted values of “mass” eterization

and “width”

do provide an adequate param-

of our data, they depend strongly on assumptions made for the actual

shapes of the resonance and background curves.

This situation is aggravated

by the observed enhancement being broad and lying close to the pr7r threshold -5-

where the shape of the phase space is crucial 10) . Using reasonable estimates for this phase space, we have obtained fitted mass values as low as 1.2 GeV. Therefore

the values quoted should be taken with some reservation.

The pnn events in the peak have a peripheral bution (fig. 8) which can be parameterized

in the form

distri-

e (5.8 * 0-4)t’ where we

In contrast to this the p” in this reaction are produced with

define t’ = t-tmin. a much flatter

momentum-transfer

t distribution

e

(1.4+0.6)t’

which is indicative

of their secondary

origin. We have looked for possible two-body structure

in the 47~decay.

There

is no evidence for a pop0 channel which would of course violate charge conjugation invariance

if we are really

observing a diffractive

also looked for possible structure are substantially .

We have

in the p’.lr* spectra (fig. 9): although they

enhanced at low mass - as expected,

itself peaks at low mass -we .

process.

since the p 71~spectrum

are unable to identify known structures.

Assuming that only L=O, 1, or 2 waves can be present in the pm system, even I-spin states are excluded as they require

either no p ’ or double p”

production.

C=-1.

This leaves only I=1 and therefore

Angular Analysis of the Decay For an (I=l,

Jp=l-)

state decaying into p”~‘r-,

the following

decay matrix

element can be written MD= corresponding

4 g.A,=li;.xqiBW(mi) i=l -

,

to the lowest angular momentum state, i. e. , an s-wave dipion

pair and an s-wave between the p” and the dipion system. zation vector,

2 is the l- polari-

zi the momentum vector in the ith 77+7r-center-of-mass

mi the corresponding

7r’n- invariant

mass and SW(m) the p” Breit-Wigner -6-

frame, form.

For not too high a 4n mass it can be shown 1696) that a simple approximation for the vector .& may be used: 4-9’=gl+~, where

g;?,are the momentum vectors of the two 7r+in the 4n rest frame.

pl,

The quality of the analyzer increases

,

A,’ is expected to become worse as the 4n mass

and useful analysis using g

the 47r peak.

must be restricted

Figure 10 shows the distribution

(defined by the direction

of &

to the lower part of

in the helicity

of flight of the 4n in the overall

center-of-mass):

M(47r) < 1.6 GeV one observes a rather pure sin2 BH distribution characteristic

of s-channel helicity

we know that this is a property

conservation

for a F=

of p” photoproduction,

tion that the 47~peak has the quantum numbers P= 1-. this polarization

phenomenon conclusively

Conversely,

we can use the property

for

which is

l- object.

Since

it gives strong indicaThe observation

of

excludes a state of Jp= Of. of s-channel helicity

enhance the 4n peak without selecting on p". momentum transfer

system

conservation

to

This is shown in fig. 11 for low

events (It I < 0.3 GeV2) and excluding events with A *:

the

4n mass spectrum weighted with sin2 8H is displayed together with the raw spectrum.

It is however difficult

to estimate the mass and width of the enhance-

ment in this way since the projection distorts

the original

using the approximate

analyzer

A’

peak. Discussion of the Results

Since our preliminary

results have been presented, 495) a four-pion

enhancement with quite similar

parameters

(M - 1.6 GeV

r - 0.35 GeV) has

been found in e+e- collisions 11) . It is then quite tempting to assume that the two experiments

are indeed

seeing a new vector meson pt; if so, the coupling -7-

constant to the photon, as derived from the two experiments, Unfortunately,

in the case of photoproduction,

should agree.

this is not directly

accessible:

assuming !fgeneralized’T vector meson dominance of the electromagnetic rent, one is led to consider two possibly dominant diagrams If we assume that the amplitude corresponding compared with that corresponding elastic scattering

(Fig. 12a and 12b).

to diagram (b) is negligible

to (a) and that the amplitudes

are comparable,

cur-

for pp and p’p

we can derive a coupling constant f

YP’

from the relationship: 2

y)’

NYP ---DP) = + yp, c (YP ‘P’P) ( ) Analogously,

.

J3P’ - 47?)

the peak cross sections for ese- production

cross sections for p (from ref.

Using the measured photoproduction for p’ (from this experiment),

are related by:

and the p colliding-beam

12) ) ,

cross section13),

eqs. (5) and (6) would predict: Gpeak

(e+e-

-

pt --L 47r*) = (17 f 6) nb

,

consistent with the measured value of (28 f 12) nb of ref. From our experiment constant f

YP’

11) .

alone we cannot say anything about the coupling

since we do not know the branching ratio for pt - 47r*.

However,

other decay modes can be considered: (i)

the 7;‘~~ decay mode seems to be quite suppressed,

experiments 3) have shown some indication

-8

-

for a structure

although two

in M(T’T-)

near

1.5 GeV.

Using the mass and width we have determined, r” 40 2 \ 30 v, + 5 20 5

IO 0 0.7

1.5

2.3

3.1

3.9

0.7

1.5

2.3

3.1

3.9

50 40 30 20 IO 0 M (4~)

iGeW

21.203

L-&....~2.’

-.:.i .

. .4 . ~..

-

..-

a

I k= I= I #= +

_,_.^.

- ..,,.

.*

Lo+ cd +a

*

-._-.-.

.*

.

.

*.

_.--.-

.

--

.

L.

,

L

.

. .

.

.

. ,*...

.

. *

.

. _.-----

,

. .

.

. *. -

.

. -:

-. . .

-.

* . ‘*

.

..__L

**’

.,

.

.

.

L

g

‘0 Q-

.

AW’J ._,...,.

0 N

_--.-._.

,,_ _-..

;

.- -.

__

._ ,

_.-..

n

-h-

~.

-z

1 r

0

.

09l/SlN3’El ., . . ._

-..-.

.

$

._

--.A.---

0 CL!

._- ,

-..-

*‘.

i

.

0

. ” ’





_..._



‘. - ^_.._..

7 .

_ . . . _ .~

_:

,

-

-.~

8.

I

L

P

‘5.. _, .

1

,.

‘.

+* i

.; I / !

. ,.___._ _A._ >.._A._

,.

---

i

-._.

.

--ill___

.: .



---

‘/ i ii



IO 6-18 GeV A++excluded GeV

04.

02. -t!

(GeV*> FIG. 8

06.

08. 214210

..~

L..

I

.:” / ._____

I._ __.

~

: .A ;.+ J _-

‘:

.._. -__ .“__

__.__. --.

.

L..

:

125 / , , ‘,

” ii

100 8. !

25

0.8

1.0

1.4

1.8

M (pork)

FIG. 9

2.2 ( GeV 1

2.6 2142hS

6-18 GeV M (4~) .< I.6 GeY

p” in, A’%ut

1.6 < M(4r)

< 2.0 GeY

30

M(47d > 2.0 GeY I

-

20

IO

0 -I

0

+I

-I

0

+I

‘.

cos 8, Fig. 70

21c5811

. :.:

7

/

j ,i’i 1 I1

n -. ul .

0

0

Weighted

Events A00 Iv 0 :

.

CT

MeV 0 0

s

Events/100 OJ 0

MeV P 0

/ I

i \ j

!

I :

1 I

/

‘(

i \ :

; ;

0-d Fig. 12

2142ii6