SLICED Subscapularis tendon tears underdiagnosed ...

2 downloads 0 Views 3MB Size Report
Beaudreuil J, Nizard R, Thomas T, Peyre M, Liotard JP, Boileau P et al. Contribution of clinical tests ... Boston: Thomas Todd; 1934. p. 262-312. 10. D'Addesi LL ...
Serviço de Ortopedia Director: Dr. Pedro Beja da Costa

Director: Prof. Doutor José Guimarães Consciência

Subscapularis tendon tears underdiagnosed? Comparison of diagnostic tests and MRI Retrospective study of 55 rotator cuff arthroscopic surgeries Clara Azevedo, Carla Madaíl, Susana Vinga, Patrícia Rodrigues, Nuno Oliveira, Bárbara Campos

SECEC, Dubrovnik 19-22 September 2012

Introduction

Literature review

Subscapularis tendon tear

• Incidence

– Isolated: rare5,16

– + other RC tendon tear:

• Cadaver/open surgery = 3,5 - 37%9,14,21,24 • Arthroscopic surgery = 19 - 29,4%1,2,20

• Clinical diagnosis

– difficult, using established clinical tests:

• Lift-off+belly-press+Napoleon+bear-hug missed 40%2 • Lift-off+modified belly-press +belly-off+IRLS missed 15%3

• Examinations - MRI

– complete/partial rotator cuff tear 60-100% sensitivity11,27

– subscapularis tendinopathy/tear 78,9% Sen / 71,8% Spec23

• Treatment

– Partial articular tears: open surgery underestimates subscapularis tendon tear frequency7,19

2. Barth JR, Burkhart SS, De Beer JF. The bear-hug test: a new and sensitive test for diagnosing a subscapularis tear. Arthroscopy. 2006; 22(10):1076-84 3. Bartsch M, Greiner S, Haas NP, Scheibel M. Diagnostic values of clinical tests for subscapularis lesions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010 7. Burkhart SS, Tehrany AM. Arthroscopic subscapularis tendon repair: Technique and preliminary results. Arthroscopy 2002; 18(5):454-63 19. Kim S, Oh I, Park J, Shin S, Jeong W. Intra-articular repair of an isolated partial articular-surface tear of the subscapularis tendon. Am J Sports Med 2005; 33(12):1825-1830

23. Mohtadi NG, Vellet AD, Clark ML, Hollinshead RM, Sasyniuk TM, Fick GH, Burton PJ. A prospective, double-blind comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy in the evaluation of patients presenting with shoulder pain. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004;13(3):258-65. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2004.01.003

Introduction

Hipothesis • Subscapularis tendon tear combined with other RC lesions:

– High incidence? Underdiagnosed lesion? – Difficult clinical and imaging evaluation? Diagnostic value of clinical tests and MRI? – Surgical approach and repair: does underdiagnosing have treatment implications?

Methods

Study Design • Target-population: refractory to conservative

treatment tendinopathy or rotator cuff tendon tear • Reference standard: arthroscopic diagnosis – Subscapularis tendon tear’s incidence? – Diagnostic tests Vs examinations:

lift-off, belly-press Vs Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Methods

Patient Selection • Prospectively collected data • arthroscopic shoulder surgery patients retrospectively reviewed – Inclusion criteria: • Rotator cuff tendinopathy or tendon tear • November 2008 – May 2010 • Operated on by the the first author

– Exclusion criteria : • Revision surgery

Methods

55 patients • 5/55 patients without MRI (4 ultrasound; 1 CAT-scan) = excluded from comparative analysis of tests vs MRI

lift-off and belly-press (55/55) MRI (50/55) Arthroscopic surgery (55/55)

Lift-off15

Belly-press15

15. Gerber C, Hersche O, Farron A. Isolated Rupture of the Subscapularis Tendon. Results of Operative Repair. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1996; 78: 1015 – 23

Methods

Methods

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Arthroscopy

Classification22, 26

Methods

Debridement

Repair (suture anchor fixation – single row) and LHB tendon intra-articular tenotomy/tenodesis

Statistics - Logistic regression analysis 22. Lafosse L, Jost B, Reiland Y, Audebert S, Toussaint B, Gobezie R. Structural integrity and clinical outcomes after arthroscopic repair of isolated subscapularis tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89(6): 1184-1193.

26. Snyder SJ: Arthroscopic classification of rotator cuff lesions and surgical decision making. In: Snyder SJ, editor. Shoulder arthroscopy. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2003. 201-207.

Results

Demographics Age (years)

53 ± 9.0* (range 32-73)

Sex Male

19

34.5%

Female

36

65.5%

Time elapsed from onset of pain to surgery (months)

13.9 ± 15.3* (range 0.9-63.9)

Operated side Right

30

54.5%

Left

25

45.5%

31

56.4%

– active

48

87.3%

– retired

4

7.3%

Intellectual worker – active

2

3.6%

– retired

1

1.8%

In situ

52

94.5%

Dislocated

3

5.5%

Dominant side operated Occupation type - work status Manual worker

Long Head of Biceps status at arthroscopy

* mean ± standard deviation

Results

15 subscapularis tendon tears 27.27%

8 partial articular-sided tears (type I) + 7 upper third complete tears (type II) 10 9

9

No subscapularis tendon tear

Subscapularis tendon tear (Lafosse et al)

9 8

Type I subscapularis tendon tear

7 7 6

Type II subscapularis tendon tear

6 5 4 4 3 3 2

2

2

2 1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1 1

1

1 0

0

0

0

AIII

AIV

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

AI

AII

Rotator cuff lesion (Snyder)

BI

BIII

CII

CIII

CIV

Clinical tests/MRI diagnostic value Tests Subscapularis tendon tear

sensitivity %

specificity %

PPV %

NPV %

accuracy %

Lift-off*

60,0

80,0

52,9

84,2

74,5

Belly-press*

40,0

97,5

85,7

81,3

81,8

MRI†

46,7

97,1

87,5

81,0

82,0

Belly-press/MRI†

73,3

94,3

84,6

89,2

88,0

Lift-off*

62,5

74,5

29,4

92,1

72,7

Belly-press*

62,5

95,7

71,4

93,8

90,9

MRI†

50,0

90,5

50,0

90,5

84,0

Belly-press/MRI*†‡

100,0

88,1

61,5

100,0

90,0

Subscapularis tendon tear repair

PPV= positive preditive value; NPV= negative preditive value *N=55 †N=50 ‡ subscapularis tendon tear repair when at least one is positive

Belly-press= Less sensitive. More specific. Belly-press/MRI= More accurate (4 false-/2 false+)

Results

Results

Treatment implications?

Subscapularis surgery and MRI results No lesion/tendinopathy/strain

Tear

Total

Simple lesion debridement

4

1

5

Lesion debridement and coracoidoplasty

0

1

1

Repair

4

4

8

None

34

2

36

Total

42

8

50

8/15 (14,5%) subscapularis tendon tears 4/8 missed by the MRI (2 strain + 2 tendinopathy) Tears to repair – MRI: Sen 50%, Spe 90,5% – lift-off: Sen 62,5% (5/8), Spe 74,5% – belly-press: Sen 62,5%, Spe 95,7%

Discussion

Incidence

27,27%

29,4%2 ; 27,4%1 ; 19%20

Belly-press

Sen 40%, Spe 97,5%

Sen 40%, Spe 97,9%2

Lift-off

Sen 60%, Spe 80%

Sen 59-62%, Spe 85-100%4

MRI

Sen 46,7%, Spe 97,1%

Sen ? Spe ? For subscapularis tendon tear?23

Belly-press/MRI (for repair) Sen 100%, Spe 88,1% Sen ? Spe ? For subscapularis tendon tear repair? 1. Arai R, Sugaya H, Mochizuki T, Nimura A, Moriishi J, Akita K. Subscapularis Tendon Tear: An Anatomic and Clinical Investigation. Arthroscopy. 2008 2. Barth JR, Burkhart SS, De Beer JF. The bear-hug test: a new and sensitive test for diagnosing a subscapularis tear. Arthroscopy. 2006; 22(10):1076-84 4. Beaudreuil J et al. Contribution of clinical tests to the diagnosis of rotator cuff disease: A systematic literature review. Joint Bone Spine 2009 20. Kim TK et al. Partial tears of the subscapularis tendon found during arthroscopic procedures on the shoulder: a statistical analysis of sixty cases. Am J Sports Med 2003 23. Mohtadi NG, Vellet AD, Clark ML, Hollinshead RM, Sasyniuk TM, Fick GH, Burton PJ. A prospective, double-blind comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy in the evaluation of patients presenting with shoulder pain. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004;13(3):258-65

MRI Sen 46,7%, Spe 97,1%

Discussion

Subscapularis tendon tear

• Sen too low: low accuracy (82%) • Diagnostic tests and arthroscopies performed by first author: ≠ 7 MRI centres ≠ 15 radiologists Ξ experience level/protocols/MRI acquisition techniques ≠ confounding variables

• MRI is reader and operator dependent28 28. Torstensen ET, Hollinshead RM. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy in the evaluation of shoulder pathology. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999. 8(1):42-5.

Conclusion

Subscapularis tendon tears underdiagnosed? • Partial articular or upper third complete tears associated to other rotator cuff tendon tears or tendinopathy are frequent • Clinical and imaging diagnosis may be difficult: lift-off , belly-press and MRI have insufficient sensitivity and specificity • Underdiagnosing may have treatment implications: most undiagnosed tears would require repair • Arthroscopy allows for the identification and repair of partial tears

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28.

Arai R, Sugaya H, Mochizuki T, Nimura A, Moriishi J, Akita K. Subscapularis Tendon Tear: An Anatomic and Clinical Investigation, Arthroscopy. 2008; (9): 997-1004. Referências doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2008.04.076 Barth JR, Burkhart SS, De Beer JF. The bear-hug test: a new and sensitive test for diagnosing a subscapularis tear. Arthroscopy. 2006; 22(10):1076-84. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.05.005 Bartsch M, Greiner S, Haas NP, Scheibel M. Diagnostic values of clinical tests for subscapularis lesions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010. doi: 10.1007/s00167-010-1109-1 Beaudreuil J, Nizard R, Thomas T, Peyre M, Liotard JP, Boileau P et al. Contribution of clinical tests to the diagnosis of rotator cuff disease: A systematic literature review. Joint Bone Spine 2009; 76: 15-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2008.04.015 Bennett WF. Visualization of the anatomy of the rotator interval and bicipital sheath. Arthroscopy 2001; 17:107–111. doi: 10.1053/jars.2001.21024 Boileau P, Brassart N, Watkinson DJ, Carles M, Hatzidakis AM et al. Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the supraspinatus: does the tendon really heal? J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87:1229-1240. doi:10.2106/JBJS.D.02035 Burkhart SS, Tehrany AM. Arthroscopic subscapularis tendon repair: Technique and preliminary results. Arthroscopy 2002; 18(5):454-63. doi: 10.1053/jars.2002.30648 Chao S, Thomas S, Yucha D, Kelly JD 4th, Driban J, Swanik K. An electromyographic assessment of the "bear hug": an examination for the evaluation of the subscapularis muscle. Arthroscopy. 2008; 24(11):1265-70. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.01.022 Codman EA. Rupture of the supraspinatus tendon and other lesions in or about the subacromial bursa. In: The shoulder. 2nd ed. Boston: Thomas Todd; 1934. p. 262-312. D’Addesi LL, Anbari MS, Reish MW, Brahmabhatt S, Kelly JD. The subscapularis footprint: an anatomic study of the subscapularis tendon insertion. Arthroscopy. 2006; 22(9): 937-940. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.04.101 De Jesus JO, Parker L, Frangos AJ, et al. Accuracy of MRI, MR arthrography, and ultrasound in the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears: a meta-analysis. Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:1701-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.1241 Deutsch A, Altchek DW, Veltri DM, Potter HG, Warren RF. Traumatic tears of the subscapularis tendon. Clinical diagnosis, magnetic resonance imaging findings, and operative treatment. Am J Sports Med 1997; 25:13-22. doi:10.1177/036354659702500104 Diane B, Parker L, Zoga1 A, Morrison W. Abnormalities on MRI of the subscapularis tendon in the presence of a full-thickness supraspinatus tendon tear. AJR 2006; 186:454-459. doi:10.2214/AJR.04.1723 Flury MP, John M, Goldhahn J, Schwyzer H-K, Simmen BR. Rupture of the subscapularis tendon (isolated or incombination with supraspinatus tear): When is a repair indicated? J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2006; 15:659-664. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2005.07.013 Gerber C, Hersche O, Farron A. Isolated Rupture of the Subscapularis Tendon. Results of Operative Repair. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., Jul 1996; 78: 1015 – 23. Gerber C, Krushell RJ. Isolated rupture of the tendon of the subscapularis muscle: clinical features in 16 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991; 73:389–394 Hertel R, Ballmer FT, Lambert SM, Gerber C. Lag signs in the diagnosis of rotator cuff rupture. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1996; 5(4):307–313. Keener D, Wei A.S., Kim HM, Paxton ES, Teefey SA, Galatz LM, Yamaguchi K. Revision arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: repair integrity and clinical outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2010; 92(3): 590 - 598. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00267 Kim S, Oh I, Park J, Shin S, Jeong W. Intra-articular repair of an isolated partial articular-surface tear of the subscapularis tendon. Am J Sports Med 2005; 33(12):1825-1830. doi: 10.1177/0363546505278259 Kim TK, Rauh PB, McFarland E. G. Partial tears of the subscapularis tendon found during arthroscopic procedures on the shoulder: a statistical analysis of sixty cases. Am J Sports Med 2003; 31(5):744-750. Kreuz PC, Remiger A, Erggelet C, Hinterwimmer S, Niemeyer P, Gatchter A. Isolated and combined tears of the subscapularis tendon. Am J Sports Med. 2005; 33(12): 1831-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546505277118 Lafosse L, Jost B, Reiland Y, Audebert S, Toussaint B, Gobezie R. Structural integrity and clinical outcomes after arthroscopic repair of isolated subscapularis tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89(6): 1184-1193. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00007 Mohtadi NG, Vellet AD, Clark ML, Hollinshead RM, Sasyniuk TM, Fick GH, Burton PJ. A prospective, double-blind comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy in the evaluation of patients presenting with shoulder pain. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004;13(3):258-65. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2004.01.003 Sakurai G, Ozaki J, Tomita Y, Kondo T, Tamai S. Incomplete tears of the subscapularis tendon associated with tears of the supraspinatus tendon: Cadaveric and clinical studies. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1998; 7:510-515. Scheibel M, Magosch P, Pritsch M, Lichtenberg S, Habermeyer P. The belly-off sign: a new clinical diagnostic sign for subscapularis lesions. Arthroscopy 2005; 21(10):1229–1235. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.06.021 Snyder SJ: Arthroscopic classification of rotator cuff lesions and surgical decision making. In: Snyder SJ, editor. Shoulder arthroscopy. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2003. 201-207. Teefey SA, Rubin DA, Middleton WD, et al. Detection and quantification of rotator cuff tears. Comparison of ultrasonographic, magnetic resonance imaging, and arthroscopic findings in seventy-one consecutive cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86-A(4):708-16. Torstensen ET, Hollinshead RM. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy in the evaluation of shoulder pathology. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999. 8(1):42-5. doi:10.1016/S1058-2746(99)90053-8