Sonographic presentation and differential diagnosis

1 downloads 0 Views 285KB Size Report
rezultatele lor au fost înregistrate cu scopul de a stabili criteriile de diagnostic ecografic în .... As the results indicate the accuracy of ultrasound diagnosed.
Original papers

      !""#$%&&$ !$'(#

Sonographic presentation and differential diagnosis of mycetoma (Modura foot) Qureshi Mohamed Ali1, Syed Amir Gilani2, Elreyah Mustafa3   1 4 %$!     !" #%$!   /   6  %$!   2

Abstract  !  7(    8 %    !       %   ! " #% $!       !     6  % $! %     8   38  ! ! !  !    8    3!   !  !    3 !       

Key words:  %  ! Rezumat              9 7(    :  %   :     " #   !9 %$! % ; :   :  #: 2   :        <   3    2 < 3 

Cuvinte cheie: % 2    !  %  2 %   %  #  @ A # #!3        ! #     3 3  3!!3  ;             !   ! ;!  !      B%       # #!?   !      %       A#

  3                            !" #$! %   &    '  !  (()*+,+-)-.*)/0 !  !   !   1  !! !#     2      3 !  

Types of mycetoma ;! 8         3      =3 > ;! 3      ? 8     !     Tabel I 4#      Bacteria                           Fungus   .      .     .     .   

6

C! !

         ))      )* )+

&# !#      !8     2   !  ! !

Epidemiology ;!   !   3     !   8!82  3 -E*) ;!         !# ! !! #  # 8!? 8 !   3% ! 38 ! -7F ! /(F !;!3  % % % % G % B % H  % 4  3%     !8!   # 8! !   8!#! ! !       %  

 ! ! "%  !#3     !!     ;!         !     !      ;!              !! ! !3 ! !?    3  3!  3I  !!    ?%    

Pathogenesis ;!     J 8!      8 ?      @    38  )( *(  ;! J3     3    !!#3  !  !      # #    3? !?          !

!          !  !  # ! 

Clinical presentation of disease ;! !  3 ,? !      !     6     !       8  !    I% !       8   8 !    #    8!  8     !  ;! 3  !    

   3     3  #   %#8  !

%   8!  !  % ?              8=2->

Fig 1.       8!  8! 8!      !     

 !      %        8   ;!B            

 ! 3   %   32     ! @8!  @  !3 

Differential diagnosis ;!        !   3   %3  % ! ! K  L!      !3   

 ,  %! %8  !! 3 

Investigations       B% ? 3   !      ! #       3! 8!    8, 

    1 J   ! 3      2     2    B, !#  3   # #  4;  3  # !       #3  ! 3    # #  3  # !   !8 

Complications ;! 2 3  #  %   ? 

 4!                 #  ##    M !  3   23   !  4            B          3   ! 

 "  !)((+A--=)> 7,+

Prognosis        3  8! !     3   !  3    !  !!        J  N-%)%/%*O

Material and method ;! 7(     -E    /) %     )( .( !  -0=/)P>! 3 ? ! !3  8!/( =0(P> !  # #    ! 3 =    8 3>  *=EP>! # #  B8!3 ?  !   8     & M  ,+   ! Q4     #B8  !!J   8!    8   #   8#

Results

Fig 3.         =  > ;!   !  ? 3 ? !  3  8% !8 !  !   8!!  !     8! ! !  8  !8! 

       % ! !        7(   8         B  ;!3 2!  *0 =+)P>   L

     3  8+*P    +(P   !    =2),-(> - R?!    !  8!    #!  !    8! ! #S@      )       @         ! A   8  !!   ! !  !   ?= > !   /  3  %     ?      ! 8!     %     * L    %  !     @ 8  3       

Fig 2.;!    @=!    !  >   !!  !   =!  ? 8! >

Fig 4.     =  >;!  !  ? 3 ? %!8 !  !   8!!  !     8! ! !  8  !8! 

Fig 5.K     =    >,   3 ?8!  %@  %       

.

E

C! !

         ))      )* )+

Fig 6. K     =    >,   8!  %@  %        

Fig 9.K     =    >,   !  ,   8!    %  @  %       

Fig 7.     =  >;!  !   ? !!   %!8  !  !     8! !  !        8! !  !  8  !8! 

Fig 10.K     =    >   ! !    8! ! 8           3   # 3  

Discussion ;!!2#  !  !        8! !8   #    ;!

         !  !8!    ! !  !

      +)P    !

  !   3  8+*P    8+(P

Conclusion Fig 8. K     =    >,  !  !! 8!  %@

 %       

"    # 

   !       #      

 "  !)((+A--=)> 7,+

Recommendations "   8!       !! J    # # 

A3 2   

References  -M %6 %  &%

  3 ?,   8!#   R;  6)((0A.7 --(0T--(.

 )$  % 6 G% ? 1%   ;! 2    1 #  !     3   )(()A*0 *(+T*-)  /  6% 4 3 4     3 1   # R4 ! -++*A*. E7TE0  *# M4%L#%H  %M  ;  

3&B !I    

 8!   #8 !# 3  -+++A-0 7.T7+

+