SERBIAN GOVERNMENT MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT
PROCEEDINGS
SPEECH AND LANGUAGE 2017 6th International Conference on Fundamental and Applied Aspects of Speech and Language
Editors Mirjana Sovilj Slobodan Joviĉić Miško Subotić Slavica Maksimović
Belgrade, Crowne Plaza 27-29 October, 2017
1
Patrons: Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development – Republic of Serbia - Serbia Organizers: Life activities advancement center - Serbia The Institute for Experimental Phonetics and Speech Pathology ―ĐorĊe Kostić‖ Serbia Organiziation: Organizing Committee, IEPSP, LAAC Secretariat, Gospodar Jovanova 35, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia. Tel./Fax: (+381 11 3208 544, +381 11 2624 168) e-mail:
[email protected] web: http://www.iefpg.org.rs Publisher: Life activities advancement center The Institute for Experimental Phonetics and Speech Pathology ―ĐorĊe Kostić‖ Electronic version on publication CIP - Каталогизација у публикацији - Народна библиотека Србије, Београд 81'234-053.2(048) 616.22-008.5-053.2(048) 81'233-053.2(082) 811.16'34(082) INTERNACIONAL Conference on Fundamental and Applied Aspects of Speech and Language (6 ; Beograd) Speech and Language 2017 [Elektronski izvor] : proceedings / 6th International Conference on Fundamental and Applied Aspects of Speech and Language, Belgrade, 27-29 October, 2017. ; [editors Mirjana Sovilj ... [at al.]. - Belgrade : The Institute for Experimental Phonetics and Speech Pathology "Đorđe Kostić" : Life Activities Advancement Center, 2017 (Belgrade : Draslar partner). - 1 elektronski opticki disk (CD-ROM) : tekst ; 12 cm Sistemski zahtevi: Nisu navedeni. - Nasl. sa naslovnog ekrana. - Radovi na srp. , rus i engl. jeziku. - Tiraž 500. - Bibliografija uz svaki rad. ISBN 978-86-89431-24-7 (LAAC) 1. Sovilj, Mirjana [уредник] 2. Jovičić, Slobodan [уредник] 3. Subotić, Miško [уредник] 4. Maksimović, Slavica [аутор] a) Говорни поремећаји - Деца - Зборници b) Вербална комуникација Дефектолошки аспект - Зборници c) Говор - Развој - Деца - Зборници d) Словенски језици - Изговор - Зборници COBISS.SR-ID 252533004
Circulation: 500 ISBN: 978-86-89431-24-7
2
Scientific Board
Organizational Board
President: M. Sovilј (Serbia)
President: S. Maksimović (Serbia)
Vice Presidents: D. Popov (Bugarska) M. Subotić (Serbia)
Vice Presidents: S. Đoković (Serbia) S. Punišić (Serbia)
Members: G. Brikman (Israel) R. Bjelјac Babić (France) G. Garyev (Russia) B. Gerazov (Makedonia) S. Golubović (Serbia) M.Stepanovna Gončarenko (Ukraine) S. Gudurić (Serbia) O. Gouni (Greece) J. Grigorjevs (Latvia) V. Delić (Serbia) R. Dragićević (Serbia) S. Jovičić (Serbia) Đ. Koruga (Serbia) A. Kostićnikola (Serbia) L. Nazarenko (Ukraine) N. Nedelјković (Serbia) V. Popova (Bulgaria) Lj. Rakić (Serbia) M. Rakočević (Serbia) D. Raković (Serbia) M. Sečujski (Serbia). T. Tarner (Netherlands) H. Tivadar (Slovenia) M. Čukić Radenković (Serbia) G. Škarić Varošanec (Croatia) D. Zec (SAD)
Members: T. Adamović (Serbia) V. ĐorĎević (Serbia) Lj. Jeličić (Serbia) V. Nenadović (Serbia) M. Panić (Serbia) M. Stokić (Serbia) Z. Šarić (Serbia) M. Vojnović (Serbia)
Secretariat: J. Bojović (Serbia) V. Ţikić (Serbia) S. Fatić (Serbia) D. Sovilj (Serbia) N. Stanojević (Serbia) N. Tatić Urošev (Serbia) N. Popić (Serbia) D. Zečević (Serbia)
3
CONTENTS Linguistic personology – a new science in paradigm of anthropological linguistics D. Popov
11
Assistive character of speech technology V. Delić, M. Seĉujski, N. Jakovljević, D. Mišković
18
Валеологические аспекты речи, звуков, букв М.С.Гончаренко, Т.П. Камнева
27
Lingvopedagogical process as a part of spiritual development of a human M. Goncharenko, T. Bogomaz
33
EEG rhythm correlates in the examination of state of inner prayer M. Sovilj, Z. Radiĉević
41
On quantum-holographic and trans-generational implications for child developement D. Raković
51
Language acquisition in infants raised in bilingual environments R. Bijeljac-Babić
61
The possibility of studying deeper levels of meaning in the most frequent verbs in Serbian language M. Sovilј, A. Margot
69
“To be or not to be?” What a question!©2017 J. R. G. Turner, T. G. N. Turner
75
Хармонијски језички код ДНК у историји светске цивилизације M. Гроздановић, А. Маргот, М. Совиљ
79
Harmony of languages code of DNA in the history of world civilization M. Grozdanović, A. Margot, M. Sovilj
93
Слово E у Делфима и ''опет'' времена и хармоније србског језика M. Гроздановић, А. Маргот, М. Совиљ
107
Letter ''Е'' in Delphie, ''opeth'' - ''again'' of time and harmonies of serbian language M. Grozdanović, A. Margot, M. Sovilj
121
EMA measures for representation of articulatory movements M. Subotić, R. Bilibajkić, P. Subotić
135
Negative influence of hyperventilation to phonation M. Ostojić
143
Probabilistic approach to the nearest neighbor classifiers in the characterization of the phonemes D. Furundţić, S. Punišić, R. Bilibajkić
5
147
Identificational probability functions of the perceptual recognition of africates’ and fricatives’ duration S. Punišić, M. Subotić, D. Furundţić Modeling of the KSAFA speech therapy device transfer function using gamma-tone filter bank Z. M. Šarić, M. Subotić, R. Bilibajkić, S. T. Joviĉić, M. Barjaktarović
154
168
Problems of creating stimulus sentences for hearing test with QuickSIN test M. N. Vojnović
175
Active imagination in the nature – verbal implications S. Zdravković, S. Joviĉić
180
Developmental relationship between language and theory of mind in the children S. Todorović, I. Stanković, V. ĐorĊević
186
Onomatopoeias as precursors of grammar in the ontogenesis V. Popova
196
Assessment of linguistic closeness and comparison of acoustic characteristics of Croatian and Serbian languages G. Varošanec-Škarić The effect of F0 and formant manipulations on the perception of voice attractiveness and likeability in the Czech context L. Tyleĉková
205
211
Single gene disorders and language phenotype M. Rakonjac, I. Bogavac, B. Bobić Gece
219
Overview of the language neurobiology M. Vujovic, M. Rakonjac, M. Stokić
225
The importance of live blood analysis dark field microscopy in treatment of neurodevelopmental disorders T. Antin Pavlović Hyperbilirubinemia as a potential predictor of speech and language deficits expression I. Bogavac, S. Fatić, M. Tešović Risk factors in children with speech, language, learning and behavioral disorders and type of delivery S. Maksimović, M. Mitrović, S. Fatić Irregular patterns in EEG activity as a potential predictor of speech – language deficits Lj. Jeliĉić, Z. Radiĉević, N. Stanojević Increased right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex activity reflects anxiety-related memory decline in adults who stutter M. Stokić, V. Nenadović, N. Stanojević 6
230
238 242
253
260
Electrophysiological correlates of verbal memory in children with specific language impairment N. Stanojević, D. Zeĉević, M. Stokić The relationship between the ability to understand speech and EEG findings in children with disabilities in language development D. Zeĉević, V. Zikić, A . Veselinović Correlation of balance ability and speech-language development in 5 year-old children T. Adamović, M. Sovilj, M. Vojnović Assessment of vestibular function at birth as an early intervention in the prediction of speech and language development of the child K. Ribarić-Jankes, T. Adamović, Lj. Jeliĉić Personal narratives from students experiencing emotional and behavioural problems: consciousness and cognition the procrastination and withdrawal M. Drossinou – Korea Asimetry in tone-hearing threshold and speech detection threshold in the left and right ear among children with speech and language disorders V. Plećević, S. Đoković Examining the association between restricted, repetitive and stereotyped behavior and sensory response in minimally verbal children with ASD V. Nenadović, M. Stokić, B. Bobić-Gece
267
273
281
287
293
302
313
Lexical and semantic abillities in children with SLI S. Fatic, I. Bogavac, S. Maksimović
319
Fricatives and developmental speech-language disorders V. ĐorĊević, M. Panić
324
Analysis of gross motoric movements in phonetic correction based on verbotonal method A. Dobrić
328
Vowels in Croatian as foreign language – example of native Slavic speakers A. Bukovski , A. Dobrić
334
The role that speech and language plays in the medicines of ancient people A. Ţikić
342
Валеологический туризм, как один из методов восстановления энергетики горлового центра (на примере посещения пирамид и туннелей в г. Високо Босния и Герцеговина, валеологического питания и применения технологий Сознания) И. В. Яровая Neurocardiological anamnesis: development from complementarities with syndrome differentiation of Traditional Chinese Medicine Z. A. Matić, T. Bojić, A. Ţikić, D. Raković, B. Milovanović
7
347
351
Towards a homeopathic remedy by exploring the matrix of human being existance T. Karajanov Ilić
361
Prenatal roots of communication - a few cases of evidence J. Jovanović, O. Vasić
365
The significance of dramatization for the development of adequate communication of mother and child D. Sovilj, V. Kljajević
369
The influence of ultrasound on the speech and language development D. M. ĐorĊević
373
Pre-lingual monitoring of the speech apparatus development M. N. Vojnović
379
Cognitive advantages of intensive second language acquisition D. Purić, J. Vuksanović, V. Chondrogianni
385
Requests as speech acts: the case of parliamentary requests O. Jojić
393
The potential link between digestive system and behaviour in children with autistic spectrum disorder B. Bobić Gece, Lj. Jeliĉić, M. Tešić
401
Applying phonetics in communication disorders research – perspectives in Bulgaria G. Padareva-Ilieva
406
The algorithm for the automatic detection of phoneme intensity disorders R. Bilibajkić, Z. M. Šarić, S. T. Joviĉić
412
The treatment of relative clauses through the explicit teaching of syntactic properties: two pilot studies on Italian cochlear-implanted children S. D‘Ortenzio, F. Vanzin, S. Montino, A. Martini, F. Volpato
418
The production of Wh- questions in a group of Italian cochlear-implanted children F. Volpato, S. D‘Ortenzio
421
Phonotactic constraints in young cochlear implant recipients P. Binos
428
Examination of articulation-phonological abilities of dysphasic children A. D. Veselinovic, V. Ţikić, D. Zeĉević
433
The ability of movement imitation and knowledge of their own body topography in children with developmental dysphasia M. Mitrović, M. ĐorĊević, S. Maksimović Relationship of grammar and EEG findings in children with specific language impairment M. Tešić, M. Vuković, M. Tešović
8
439
443
Skills of word decoding: a case study of a student with intellectual disability (ID) in the middle school N. Panopoulos and M. Drossinou – Korea The importance of group work for socialization and communication in children with speech, language or behavioral disorders M. ĐorĊević, I. Bacić, N. Tatić Urošev Examining differences in parents’ attitudes towards corporal punishment on preschool children with developmental disorders and their peers with typical development M. Marisavljević, V. Nenadović, A. Veselinović Dysphagia in patients with acute stroke: early screening G. Tomić,V. Miković, M. Stojanović, I. Arsić, O. Bakić, J. Pajović, D. Jovanović The importance of early screening of disgraphic remarks in the children of young school age A. Milošević Vasiljković, I. Pavković Developmental level of graphomotor skills in children with specific learning disorders V. Ţikić, S. Golubović, M. Panić The level of adoption of physics teaching content in students with the hearing impairment I. Pavković, J. Kovaĉević, I. Roksandić The level of adoption of educational content in chemistry for pupils with the hearing impairment J. Kovaĉević, I. Pavković, A. Milošević
449
458
462
466
473
479
485
489
Foreign language teaching and children with disabilities - hearing impairment D. Tomić, D. Posedi, R. Geld 494
9
Foreign Language Teaching and Children with Disabilities - Hearing Impairment D. Tomić1, D. Posedi2, R. Geld1 1
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zagreb Davorin Trstenjak Primary School, Zagreb
2
Abstract. Hearing impairment causes numerous difficulties on the development of oral communication skills. Usually, rehabilitation is based either on spoken language or sign language. Foreign language learning among HI is no longer an exception but a frequent educational challenge, especially when HI learners are part of the inclusion process. Learners are faced not only with difficulties in speech perception but also insufficient L1 knowledge and together with their teachers with lack of proper teaching material, environmental support etc. In order to address this issue so that necessary advancement of the teaching process can be made, both qualitative and quantitative studies should be conducted. The qualitative study reported in this paper included focus group and in-depth interviews with teachers who had experienced teaching hearing impaired children. The topics included previous experience with learners in inclusion, benefits of inclusion, types of impairment and specific difficulties during teaching, satisfaction with support provided by institution and additional education aimed at teaching impaired learners. The analysis revealed that teachers find inclusion beneficial, but stronger support to the teaching process is required. Support should include not only materials, education, but also information about impairment which are often missing. The teachers also emphasize that their teaching competence and skills are mostly based on in-service experience, whereas the specific knowledge about a disability and evidence-based approach to teaching is missing. Based on the analysis, a questionnaire for quantitative study was prepared. It consists of one section regarding diagnosis and impairment typology, followed by practical suggestions for classroom activities, curricular adaptation, teaching strategies, teachers‘ education and language teaching challenges.
1 Introduction In order to address the complex issue of foreign language teaching to children with any type of disability or disorder the simplest way is to address the preconditions of the learning process or simply the elements of the impairment that are influencing the learning process. In the case of hearing impairment (HI) those are: characteristics of the impairment, types of rehabilitation, preferred communication modality, use of hearing aid and environmental factors. Hearing impairment can be defined as a partial or complete inability to hear i.e. to detect and perceive sound. In order to classify the types of hearing impairment Elberling and Worsoe (2006) list five dimensions of hearing which can be affected by the impairment thus determining its type and the degree. Those are: sensitivity to sound intensity or level, dynamic range, frequency resolution, temporal resolution and binaural hearing. HI causes difficulties in oral communication due to the reduced or filtered input information, which is why HI individuals rely strongly on the visual communication. Therefore, HI individuals can either use only visual-manual modality (sign language) for communication or use the combination of visual and auditory information in variety of rehabilitation approaches (cued speech, lip reading) or attempt to develop sufficient oral communication which is promoted by some rehabilitation approaches (Auditory-Verbal Therapy, Verbotonal method etc.). What often remains unsaid in the debate between rehabilitation approaches is that language delays among HI individuals are not necessarily caused by the communicative modality but by the incomplete access to ANY language model. This means that when visual-manual modality is employed, adults do not provide complete and consistent model, since sign language is usually their foreign language, but express certain spoken elements (emotions) verbally. HI causes speech and language difficulties in L1 and this conclusion is the only one that can be considered definite from the huge body of research on HI speech and language development (Spencer & Marschark, 2010) while the rehabilitation methods and communication modalities fostering success remain disputed. Hearing aids, both traditional and implants, aid speech perception and foster oral 494
communication but they do not ‗cure‘ the impairment and the successful use of HA depends on rehabilitation. Finally, successful development of communication among HI individuals is the result of strong environmental (family and community) support. Another important question is about HI prevalence, since it is often mentioned in the research papers that the number of HI individuals is low which causes heterogeneity in the study samples and limited results showing only tendencies. The number of individuals who will benefit from the advancement of foreign language teaching of the individuals with disabilities is not insignificant. Today, there are 360 million HI individuals in the world (WHO) who have hearing loss greater than 40 dB in the better hearing ear, 32 million of these are children and slightly less than one fifth are deaf individuals (70 million, World Federation of the Deaf). Contemporary educational policies promote inclusion as a dominant approach in education of individuals with disabilities (Vican & Karamatić Brĉić, 2013) because it is based on the right of all students to participate equally in the education process in order to develop their full potential. Teachers‘ attitudes towards inclusion have generated a large body of research (Avramidis & Norwich, 2002) showing that teachers have positive attitude towards inclusion, but are clearly aware of the difficulties in the process. The term inclusion means that a mainstream educational setting is adapted to the needs of children with disabilities creating a community of all learners regardless of their ability or disability. Therefore, successful inclusion is a result of involvement and collaboration between teachers, other educational professionals and parents who support the learner during the learning process. Finally, the importance of foreign language learning needs to be addressed. Unquestionably, foreign language learning is the ‗educational necessity of the 21st century‘ for both hearing and hearing impaired individuals, and English language is definitely the most frequently learned foreign language. In order to help HI individuals to use the technology and other benefits of globalization, foreign language teaching (FLT) should be adapted to their special needs. This question is being raised among FL teachers in several European countries in which English is taught as L2; in Poland, Czech Republic, Hungary, Italy, France, Serbia, Norway and UK providing information about policies, teacher attitudes or teaching practice (see (Domagała-Zyśk, 2013) and (Domagała-Zyśk & Kontra, 2016) for an overview). Croatia has a long and successful tradition in rehabilitation of hearing impairment implementing oral/verbotonal method by Petar Guberina (Guberina, 2010). Following that tradition, we also have great success with cochlear implantation and postoperative rehabilitation (Paškvalin, 2005). In Croatia, there is a possibility of either inclusive education or education in specialized educational institution (Polyclinic SUVAG, Slava Raškaj center) for the hearing impaired. Polyclinic SUVAG offers pre-school and primary education and Slava Raškaj center primary and secondary education. Both institutions offer individual rehabilitation sessions. Inclusion of a HI child also means that a team of experts monitors and supports child‘s progress depending on the individual needs. Despite the professional support provided by the expert team in school, teachers often question their competencies when it comes to teaching children with disabilities, feel unsecure, unsatisfied or even frustrated with their teaching performance.
2 Material and method This study is a part of a larger project employing both qualitative and quantitative methodology in the study of attitudes on inclusive education. The aim of this study was to examine attitudes of foreign language teachers in Croatia about teaching children with disabilities in general. In the first phase, qualitative study design was used to gain deeper insight in the various issues that the teachers involved in the inclusive educational setting are facing, but also to examine the range of teaching strategies the teachers develop in practice. The insights from the first phase are used for the construction of a questionnaire used for the national quantitative study in the second phase. During the first phase a focus group and two semi-structured interviews were conducted. The language teachers were recruited in a primary school in Zagreb. That school has a long inclusion tradition of children with hearing impairment and language difficulties and is a positive example of an 495
inclusive educational setting, thus a great starting point for qualitative insights. The number of participants in the focus group was nine, three more than planned, due to the greater interest among the teachers. Semi-structured interviews were conducted after the focus group to deepen certain findings. The topics used for focus group and interviews were (Westwood & Graham, 2003): (1) Number of students and types of disabilities in inclusion classes, (2) Benefits of inclusion for typically developing students, (3) Types of difficulties that teachers find the most challenging, (4) Satisfaction with the available support (both material and professional), (5) Teachers‘ education necessary for teaching children with disabilities (both before employment and during).
3 Results and Discussion Focus group was opened with the following comments: I think that I do not give enough attention to my disabled learner. Definitely, definitely, I always wonder whether he got enough, that is whether I can give him more. But, we have to achieve something, something average. I wonder whether I will have enough time for that learner. The quotes from three different teachers show the current state, but also show teachers‘ motivation to give more, to adjust to learners‘ needs and teach better. 3.1 Diagnosis Participants emphasised several problems regarding detection of the disability or disorder. If a child has hearing impairment it is, in most cases, detected during early childhood. The hearing impairment diagnosis is followed by rehabilitation and the diagnosis itself is the basis for organization of educational setting. On the other hand, certain language difficulties (i.e. dyslexia, dysgraphia etc.) become evident only after the child begins with formal education. Teachers often note that a child has difficulties with understanding and inform both the parents and educational experts in school. The expert team assesses the child and directs the parents to specialized institutions for precise diagnosis in case it is necessary. The diagnostic process is often lengthy and sometimes the precise diagnosis is set several years later. Therefore, the teachers stress that their education is neither systematic nor does it cover variety of difficulties so they feel uncertain whether a child shows certain developmental delay or disability. Once the diagnosis is set, educational experts decide about program adaptations. Regardless of the program adaptations (regular or reduced program) student receives certain amount of help. The teachers are often puzzled by the amount of help needed by individual student. They want to provide help, but also foster autonomy. 3.2 Program adjustments According to the Regulations of primary and secondary education of students with developmental difficulties (cro. Pravilnik o osnovnoškolskom i srednjoškolskom odgoju i obrazovanju uĉenika s teškoćama u razvoju), students can be educated by regular curriculum with individual adjustments or by adapted curriculum and individualized adjustments or by special curriculum. The participants say that most students in their school follow curriculum with individual adjustments while only small number is educated by adapted curriculum. The participants agreed that their work is influenced by number of children with disabilities in their class because they have to offer various types of individualized program (materials, classroom management etc.). Furthermore, the boundary between individualized and adapted curriculum is unclear. This causes difficulties with preparations of lesson plans and materials. In most cases they adapt materials based on their personal judgements. 496
3.3 Parental and professional support Parents can have both positive and negative influence on the teachers, since the teacher-parent cooperation is essential. Participants all agree that parents‘ attitude towards disability has great influence on child‘s success. If the parents accept the difficulty, if they are willing to pursue various diagnostic procedures in order to get precise and timely diagnosis and follow the recommendations given by the team of educational experts, the child begins to show progress. However, if the parents do not encourage their child, the results are slow or none. Regarding the teacher-parent relation, participants mentioned several examples of great cooperation with parents, sharing findings from educational process or successful methods. On the other hand, the examples of poor cooperation are often based on parents‘ attitude toward disability (non-acceptance) and/or attitude that program adjustments are not required. Team of experts supports teaching process in all stages, and teachers feel that sometimes there is too much ‗monitoring‘ and the child often feels pressured. Regarding materials, no explicit comments were given, except that they generate materials, even published textbooks for some subjects (Croatian language). It has to be noted that materials are tailored to suit individual needs and type of educational program, teaching materials are shared among colleagues. 3.4 Benefits of inclusion for typically developing students When asked about inclusion benefits for typically developing students, teachers emphasized that the entire class benefits from the adjustments of the teaching process. For an example, slower exposition is a good example of the whole class benefit, accompanied by frequent repetitions and more question time. Participants agreed that children with disabilities are insecure without real reason, leaving the impression of being unprepared. However, it is not the lack of knowledge that causes this impression, but fear of mistakes. Focus group participants put strong emphasis on this, saying that integration of children with disabilities in mainstream classrooms has benefits for all participants of the learning process. Similarly to Westwood and Graham (2003) the classrooms become encouraging settings fostering cooperation and tolerance. All the teachers want to create atmosphere in which comments and corrections, but also help is provided with no hesitation raising awareness that learning abilities among peers may differ.
3.5 Types of difficulties that teachers find the most challenging and teaching strategies During the discussion about particular difficulties faced by language teachers, the participants mentioned: scarce L1 vocabulary and generally low metalinguistic awareness, difficulties with phonology and semantics. The students with small vocabularies in L1 will certainly have difficulties with L2 vocabulary because they cannot use L1 to explain new word or a concept. The teachers described their strategy; in such cases they use foreign language to learn new concepts in L1. Since L2 is learned explicitly with higher level of metalinguistic awareness, learning L2 indirectly influences L1. One of the examples is the notion of homesick in English which is translated as a desire for home in Croatian, but the problem arises when the student is not familiar with the notion of desire. If the English word is contextualized its meaning is learned but also applied to Croatian. Furthermore, students with disabilities often have problems in word order tasks. In this case the task adjustment is to make the task linear so that clauses are already inserted making the task easier. Additional problem faced by HI students are speech sounds and their role in a language. Surely, if there are problems with phonology, there will be problems with semantics and this is particularly evident in L2, since semantics in L1 is less important, while in L2 the focus is on grammatical forms. Due to the differences in approach, certain phenomena being explained in detail in L2 it may sometimes seem that students have less difficulties with L2 phonology and semantics. Participants stress that they do not approach the language as a study object but as a means of communication. This strategy encourages students to understand the context without details and to simplify the structures. The examples are: shortening of texts, simplification of sentence structure and 497
emphasizing important information in the text. More examples for wide variety of subjects are available in a book Can you hear the difference? (Bakota, 2015) Lesson planning must include students with disabilities, consequently teachers develop certain teaching strategies. Participants listed the following strategies labelling them as their core ones: extremely detailed lesson plan, quantitative adjustment of teaching material and speed and development of ―micro approach‖ depending on the difficulty. Detailed lesson plan means that the teacher has general (mainstream) lesson plan but also special assignments or procedures for the students with disabilities. That is why in some classes in which there are more children with disabilities this will mean preparation of several procedures for a single assignment. The procedure may include reduction of the teaching material which is another basic teaching strategy used for both individualized or adapted program. Another problem faced by teachers is assessment. Every subject teacher must take into account student‘s ability and possible limitations. Participants explain that teachers follow achievement and encourage progress resulting in a grade which is more an indicator of effort and progress than real achievement. 3.6 Teachers’ education necessary for teaching children with disabilities Teachers‘ education is neither systematic nor does it include wide spectrum of disorders, therefore the teachers are unable to make a difference between disability/disorder or developmental delay. They agree that educations are useful and can be applied for lesson planning. However, the educations are rare and sometimes give general information. In other words, the educators refer to children with disabilities in general terms, perceiving them as a compact group although education, lecture or a workshop, addressing particular impairment would be of greater use. Considering the fact that most participants have 20 years of experience in teaching children with disabilities, they pointed that the received no additional education and training at the beginning of their professional life.
4 Conclusion The conclusion consists of two parts: final remarks on the qualitative study and the description of the questionnaire for the quantitative study constructed from the findings from the first part. Study results show that participants often feel incompetent and unready to teach children with disability. This is caused by insufficient information about the type and degree of the child‘s disability or lack of specific education about a particular disability. Teaching skills for hearing impairment and other disabilities are gained in practice, and with the support from the team of experts they gain crucial insights for FLT to HI children. Both material and non-material support plays important part in the process of forming teaching strategy. Despite all the challenges that teaching children with disabilities brings, all participants agreed that inclusion is positive not only for children with disabilities, but also for those typically developing because they raise awareness about differences, but the process of inclusion must be administered systematically. Regarding FLT, participants are aware that we need to upgrade teaching process in order to make FLL useful for students with disabilities. The questionnaire which will be used in the quantitative part of the study has six sections and demographics. The demographics include questions about age, gender, experience and type of school. The first section addresses diagnoses with the following questions: 1. Have you been informed about student‘s diagnosis? 2. Have you ever received any type of instruction on teaching student with a particular disorder? 3. If you were informed about the diagnosis and/or received instruction when has this occurred? 4. Who provides instruction regarding teaching children with disabilities? 5. Did you recommend diagnostic procedures for some students but they never completed them? 6. Are there students who completed diagnostic procedures and were given instructions which parents do not follow? The second section examines teaching instructions and recommendations. Whether they were written or oral, general or particular, and who issued instructions or recommendations. The third section 498
aimed at the difference between adjusted program or curriculum and individualized program, former having reduced amount of information. The questions examined authorship of the program and its supervision. Section four is about teaching strategies. General strategies like preparation of monthly or yearly planning for the adjusted or individualized program. Questions regarding particular teaching strategies included: material reduction, teaching speed, task complexity, activity adaptation, usage of special didactic toys or materials adequate for hearing impaired children. Section five examined education of the HI teachers. The questions were about the disability they are or were educated the least, about education before and during teacher‘s degree, education after the degree and about the providers of additional education. Final section examines the challenges in FLT (low vocabulary level, low level of metalinguistic awareness, semantic or phonological difficulties, problems with understanding, slow learning and fear of mistakes). Further research will bring results from the quantitative study, but also open more discussion on various aspects of various impairments and foreign language teaching.
References 1. Avramidis, E., & Norwich, B.: 'Teachers‘ attitudes towards integration / inclusion: a review of the literature'. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 17(2), 129–147, 2002 2. Bakota, K. (Ed.): Čujete li razliku? Priručnik za edukaciju odgojno-obrazovnih djelatnika za rad s djecom oštećena sluha i/ili govora, O.Š. Davorina Trstenjaka. 2015 3. Domagała-Zyśk, E. (Ed.): English as a foreign language for deaf and hard of hearing persons in Europe. Wydawnictwo KUL, 2013 4. Domagała-Zyśk, E., & Kontra, E. H. (Eds.): English as a foreign language for deaf and hard-of-hearing persons: challenges and strategies. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2016 5. Guberina, P.: Govor i čovjek. ArtTresor, 2010 6. Paškvalin, M. i sur.: Umjetna puţnica verbotonalni pristup. Poliklinika SUVAG. 2005 7. Spencer, P. E., & Marschark, M.: Evidence-based practice in educating deaf and hard-of-hearing students. Oxford University Press. 2010. 8. Vican, D., & Karamatić Brĉić, M.: 'Obrazovna inkluzija u kontekstu svjetskih i nacionalnih obrazovnih politika – s osvrtom na hrvatsku obrazovnu stvarnost', ŢIVOT I ŠKOLA: Časopis za teoriju i praksu odgoja i obrazovanja, 59(30), 48–65, 2013 9. Westwood, P., & Graham, L.: 'Inclusion of students with special needs: Benefits and obstacles perceived by teachers in New South Wales and South Australia' Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 8(1), 3–15, 2003
499
