Subsidence, Delta progradation and delta shifting

7 downloads 0 Views 4MB Size Report
Sep 26, 2014 - Relative Sea Level Rise (RSLR) in the Bengal Delta: 1. Allison and Kepple, 2001 (1–4 mm/y); Stanley and Hait, 2000. (≤5 mm/y). 2. Allison et ...
9/26/2014

Assessing the rate of subsidence in the Bengal Delta Maminul Haque Sarker1, Jakia Akter1, Md. Munsur Rahman2, Robert Nicholls3 and Steve Darby3 1Center

for Environmental and Geographic Information Services (CEGIS), Bangladesh 2Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET), Bangladesh 3University of Southampton, UK

There are several studies, researches and opinions on the rate of Relative Sea Level Rise (RSLR) in the Bengal Delta: 1. Allison and Kepple, 2001 (1–4 mm/y); Stanley and Hait, 2000 (≤5 mm/y) 2. Allison et al., 2003; Brammer, 2014 (1.3−7.1 mm/y) 3. Higgins et. al., 2014; (0 to >10 mm/ y, Dhaka) 4. Mikhailov and Dotsenko (2004) – 10-20 mm/y 5. Ericson et al. (2006) – 25 mm/y 6. Syvitski et al. (2009) – 0.8 to 18 mm/y) 7. Patheick (2012) – 20 mm/y 8. DU + Colorado University, US, Subsidence ~ 10 m/y RSLR ~ Global Sea Level Rise (GSLR) + Subsidence Subsidence compaction, Isostacy, tectonics

1

9/26/2014

Implication • The results of such research have long-term implications for Bangladesh • It has become crucial for local people, local investors, decision makers and also the development partners in making decision • To find out whether the inhabitants will be encouraged to migrate to other places from the disaster prone delta area or invest huge money to rescue the delta.

Rakas lake

Manasarowar

Geo-morphological settings

China

Nepal

Bhutan

India Every year these rivers carry: -one trillion m3 of water -one billion tones of sediment

Bangladesh

More sediment makes the rivers and esturies more dynamic

2

9/26/2014

Delta development process

The Ganges and the Jamuna entered through three corridors 1. Rajmahal Hill and Barind Tract

Barind Tract

Madhupur Tract Rajmahal Hill

2. Barind and Madhupur Tracts 3. Madhupur and Maghalaya Hills

Thickness of sedimentation during the last 11,000 years

Based on Goodbred and Khuel (2000)

3

9/26/2014

Topography

Terrain cross-profile

Tidal plain are very much flat. There are depressions between floodplain and tidal plain. Gopalganj-Khulna depressions did not receive sediment either by upstream rivers or by the tidal rivers from downstream.

4

9/26/2014

Regional Sea Level Rise (RSLR) RSLR = GSLR + SUBN + M Sea Level Rise

Subsidence

RSLR

=

Regional Sea Level Rise

GSLR

=

Global Sea Level Rise

SUBN

=

Subsidence due to Natural Compaction

M

=

Crustal Vertical Movement

In this presentation I will present the different methods that could be applied to assess the RSLR 1. Changes in river courses and landforms 2. Carbon dating data 3. Changes in tidal water level 4. Archaeological monuments We have presented an approach to assess the Relative Sea Level Rise using the Archaeological monuments

5

9/26/2014

High rate of subsidence in any area or region alters the landform and river courses We investigated these using historical maps and recent satellite images

Major James Rennels surveyed in the 1760s

Back swamp

6

9/26/2014

Locations of back swamps and main course of the river in the southwest did not change significantly over the last 250 years.

Locations of back swamps and course of the rivers in the southwest did not change in particular direction over the last 250 years, which negates a high rate of subsidence locally or regionally.

No significant change in landforms and river courses during last 240 years indicates no major disturbances

7

9/26/2014

Carbon dating data also may indicate the rate of RSLR/ Subsidence

Carbon dating

10

Depth (m)

8

6 4 2 0

0

2000

4000

6000

Age (yr) Based on Allison et al (2003)

8

9/26/2014

RSLR (cm/yr)

Carbon dating 0,8 0,7 0,6 0,5 0,4 0,3 0,2 0,1 0 0

2000

4000

6000

Age (yr)

For recent data, carbon dating generally shows much uncertainties (Stanley, 2001)

Based on Allison et al (2003)

Ground water mining due to high rate of extraction may cause very high rate of subsidence

We analyzed more than 100 ground water level data

9

9/26/2014

Level (mPWD)

3

Bagerhat districet BHO001

2

BHO002 BHO003 BHO004

1

BHO005 BHO006 BHO007

0 1970

1975

1980

1985

1990

1995

2000

2005

Rate of change in GWL

60 50 40 Count

Ground water mining is very negligible, indicating very insignificant role for high subsidence

30 20 10 0