1
Surface atmospheric response to Sea Surface Temperature anomalies under
2
different wind conditions
3
A. Foussard1,2 , G. Lapeyre1∗ and R. Plougonven1
4
1. LMD/IPSL, CNRS, Ecole Polytechnique, Ecole Normale Sup´erieure, Sorbonne Universit´e,
5
Paris, France.
6
2. Ecole des Ponts ParisTech, Champs-sur-Marne, France.
7
8
∗ Corresponding
author address: G. Lapeyre, LMD/IPSL, 24 rue Lhomond, 75005 Paris, France.
E-mail:
[email protected] Generated using v4.3.2 of the AMS LATEX template
1
ABSTRACT 9
The response of the atmospheric boundary layer to mesoscale sea surface
10
temperature (SST) is often characterized by a link between wind stress diver-
11
gence and downwind SST gradients. In this study, an idealized simulation rep-
12
resentative of a storm track above a prescribed stationary SST field is exam-
13
ined in order to determine in which background wind conditions that relation
14
occurs. The SST field is composed of a mid-latitude large-scale frontal zone
15
and mesoscale (40-400km) SST anomalies. Concerning the surface wind, it
16
is shown that the divergence of the surface wind can either correlate with the
17
Laplacian of the atmospheric boundary layer temperature or with the down-
18
wind SST gradient. The first case corresponds to background situations of
19
weak winds or of unstable boundary layers at large scales. The response at
20
the eddy scale is in agreement with an Ekman balanced adjustment in the
21
boundary layer. The second case corresponds to background situations of sta-
22
ble boundary layers. The response at the eddy scale is then in agreement with
23
strong vertical mixing of momentum. Concerning the divergence of the wind
24
stress, it generally resembles downwind SST gradients for stable and unstable
25
conditions, in agreement with past studies. However, for weak winds, the di-
26
vergence of the wind stress is correlated to some extent with the temperature
27
Laplacian. In conclusion, our study reveals the importance of the large-scale
28
wind conditions in modulating the surface atmospheric response with differ-
29
ent responses in the divergences of surface wind and of wind stress.
2