Synchrophasor Measurement Technology in Power ... - IEEE Xplore

Received December 11, 2014, accepted December 22, 2014, date of publication January 9, 2015, date of current version January 16, 2015. Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/ACCESS.2015.2389659

Synchrophasor Measurement Technology in Power Systems: Panorama and State-of-the-Art FARROKH AMINIFAR1 , (Member, IEEE), MAHMUD FOTUHI-FIRUZABAD2 , (Fellow, IEEE), AMIR SAFDARIAN2 , (Student Member, IEEE), ALI DAVOUDI3 , (Member, IEEE), AND MOHAMMAD SHAHIDEHPOUR4,5 , (Fellow, IEEE) 1 School

of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran 11365-4563, Iran of Excellence in Power System Control and Management, Department of Electrical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran 14588-89694, Iran 3 Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, USA 4 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL 60616, USA 5 Renewable Energy Research Group, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 22254, Saudi Arabia 2 Center

Corresponding author: M. Shahidehpour ([email protected])

ABSTRACT Phasor measurement units (PMUs) are rapidly being deployed in electric power networks across the globe. Wide-area measurement system (WAMS), which builds upon PMUs and fast communication links, is consequently emerging as an advanced monitoring and control infrastructure. Rapid adaptation of such devices and technologies has led the researchers to investigate multitude of challenges and pursue opportunities in synchrophasor measurement technology, PMU structural design, PMU placement, miscellaneous applications of PMU from local perspectives, and various WAMS functionalities from the system perspective. Relevant research articles appeared in the IEEE and IET publications from 1983 through 2014 are rigorously surveyed in this paper to represent a panorama of research progress lines. This bibliography will aid academic researchers and practicing engineers in adopting appropriate topics and will stimulate utilities toward development and implementation of software packages. INDEX TERMS Phasor measurement unit (PMU), synchrophasor measurement technology (SMT), wide-area measurement system (WAMS). I. INTRODUCTION

Considerable efforts have been devoted to the subjects of synchrophasor measurement technology (SMT), phasor measurement unit (PMU), wide-area measurement system (WAMS), and their applications to power systems. The literature explored in this paper preparation includes publications from the following IEEE and IET journals and standards in the period of 1983 through 2014: 1- IEEE Transactions on Power Systems (formerly IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems) 2- IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery 3- IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid 4- IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion 5- IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy 6- IEEE Transactions on Instrument and Measurement 7- IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems 8- IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 9- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 10- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 11- IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications

VOLUME 2, 2014

12131415161718192021222324252627282930-

IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing Proceedings of the IEEE IEEE Power and Energy Magazine IEEE Communications Magazine IEEE Signal Processing Magazine IEEE Industry Application Magazine IEEE Systems Journal IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics IEEE Signal Processing Letter IEEE Computer Applications in Power IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials IEEE Potentials IEEE Security and Privacy IEEE Intelligent Systems IEEE Standards IET Science, Measurement, and Technology IET Generation, Transmission, and Distribution

2169-3536 2015 IEEE. Translations and content mining are permitted for academic research only. Personal use is also permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.

1607

F. Aminifar et al.: SMT in Power Systems

31- Electronics Letters 32- Power Engineering Journal The research issues elaborated in these publications are classified into nine topics as follows: 1- SMT algorithms and PMU/WAMS structural issues 2- Generic introductions over SMT, PMU, and WAMS 3- PMU placement techniques 4- State estimation (SE) consisting of or based on PMU data 5- Model validation, calibration, and extraction via PMU data 6- Fault/event detection and location using PMU data 7- WAMS-based dynamic/stability monitoring and prediction 8- WAMS-based control strategies 9- WAMS-based protection schemes Among those listed above, categories 5 to 9 mainly correspond to the applications of PMU data from either local or wide-area perspectives. Fig. 1 shows the distribution of papers with respect to each aforementioned category. It can be observed that the most research has been devoted to the PMU constructional issues, category 1, a prerequisite for the SMT evolutions and developments of WAMS applications. The next prolific research area belongs to dynamic/stability monitoring and prediction. This observation is justified given the PMU prominent capability in capturing real-time and highresolution information in a continuous data-stream format.

FIGURE 1. Distribution of papers with respect to each category.

Fig. 2 illustrates the distribution of papers versus the publication year. As shown, the chronological trend is highly increasing, which reveals the enthusiasm of research and engineering community in developing and materializing PMU and WAMS applications. The rest of this paper digests each aforementioned category in a specific section and cites the relevant references. II. CATEGORY 1: SMT ALGORITHMS AND PMU/WAMS STRUCTURAL ISSUES

Along with the liberalization of global positioning system (GPS), the precise system-wide synchronized measurements (≈1 µs) turned out to be feasible. 1608

FIGURE 2. Distribution of papers with respect to the publication year.

Combination of this opportunity with the phasor measurement algorithms, which are based on the symmetrical component analysis and have already been developed for digital protection purposes, led to the emergence of SMT. Subsequently, PMU was designed, manufactured, and successfully examined. The accuracy of SMT has a direct bearing on the effectiveness of PMU applications and relevant functions. Accordingly, significant efforts have been dedicated to the development of efficient and precise measurement algorithms. Note as well that the majority of algorithms were based on preliminary achievements of digital protection relaying and were utilized by laboratory-scale or industrial PMUs. Algorithms for calculation of phasors and/or local system frequency and rate of change of frequency are mainly based on discrete Fourier transform (DFT) [1]–[5], Kalman filtering method [6], [7], optimized observer-based filters [8], coordinate transformation [9], modal Kalman filtering [10], zero-crossing method [2], quadrature demodulation [2], demodulation [11], direct-quadrature transformation [12], Newton type algorithm [13], least-square filtering [14]–[17], short-time Fourier transform [18], Prony’s estimation method [3], [19], z-transform and median filtering [20], neural networks [21], Newton type algorithm combined with least squares [22], constrained maximum likelihood estimation [17], enhanced phase-locked loop system [23], Blackman–Harris windowing technique [16], fast recursive Gauss-Newton adaptive filter [24], [25], and other various types of digital filters [26]–[39]. Augmented versions of DFT consisting of smart DFT [40], [41], phasor-based DFT [42], and shifting window average method DFT [43], [44] were developed with the purpose of accuracy improvement. Sample value adjustment was another idea in promoting the SMT accuracy grade [45]. Other algorithms such as enhanced DFT [18], [46]–[48], adaptive dynamic phasor estimator [49], partial sum based [50], multistage least-square [50], modified empirical mode decomposition filtering [51], and least-square method joint with short time Fourier transform [52] were proposed with the objective VOLUME 2, 2014

F. Aminifar et al.: SMT in Power Systems

of diminishing the impact of decaying dc component. Filtering out the subsynchronous frequency components from the signals associated with series-compensated transmission lines is another effort conducted in this context [53]. A full cycle data is a common requirement in most reviewed algorithms, while phasor estimation based on phasorlets, which are signal segments of a fraction of a cycle, was established as well [54], [55]. A recursive wavelet transform was also developed which is capable of estimating the phasor parameters in a quarter cycle of an input signal [56]. As sinusoidal waveform distortions are the major difficulty in the phasor estimation, a wavelet analysis could first discriminate the discontinuities followed by an adaptive window algorithm to estimate the phasor quantities [57]. The accuracy of phasor measurement under dynamic conditions was improved by dynamic phasor estimates based on least-square method [58]–[61], weighted least square [62], Shanks’ method with autoregressive moving average [63], DFT with Taylor derivatives [64], subspace based approach [65], enhanced Complex Kalman filter [66], consecutive DFT method [67], adaptive cascaded filters [68], Taylor–Fourier transform [69], [70], interpolated dynamic DFT-based estimator [71], and applying Taylor-LQG-Fourier filters [72]. Additionally, a quasi-positive sequence DFT algorithm was proposed as a single-phase measurement system [73]. Inaccurate frequency calculation under electromechanical transient circumstances and particularly at load buses has also motivated development of a new method on the basis of simplified model of generators and loads and with the objective of simulation studies [74]. Recently, a PMU simulator package built on the MATLAB-SIMULINK platform has been designed with education purposes [75]. This simulator yields a flexible environment for teaching phasor measurement and frequency estimation algorithms and phenomena. In addition to simulated signals, real-world measured point-on-wave data can be fed into this package. Although the above mentioned measurement techniques are mainly tailored for the transmission system conditions, those suited for continuous monitoring of electrical quantities in distribution networks in terms of synchronized phasors have also been developed [76]–[79]. Harmonic distortion and the impact of switching loads on the frequency estimation were of particular concerns in these techniques [80]–[83]. Extension of synchrophasor algorithms to provide PMUs with the capability of accurately estimating harmonic phasors has been recently carried out in order to proliferation of PMU applications in active distribution networks [84], [85]. The IEEE standard C37.118 for synchrophasors was compiled for many years and revised several times [86]–[93]. Since PMUs are subjected to inputs under transient conditions [94], the last version of this standard has covered such attributes. In spite of the compatibility of commercial PMUs with the IEEE standard C37.118, laboratory testing exposed noticeable disparities among the phasor estimates of PMUs associated with various manufacturers. VOLUME 2, 2014

This observation, indeed, is mainly due to the phasor computation algorithms and necessitates quality assessment techniques [68], [95]–[106], compliance analysis [107], calibration of synchronized phasor measurements [108], [109], and field testing [110], [111]. The IEEE standards C37.242 for synchronization, calibration, testing, and installation of PMUs and C37.244 for phasor data concentrator (PDC) requirements have been recently published to assist users to specify the performance and functional requirements of typical PMUs and PDCs [112], [113]. Having experienced the effectiveness of synchrophasor applications in strengthening the power system security, new intelligent electronic devices (IEDs) are being enabled to work as PMU devices [114]. Miscellaneous substation devices such as protection relays, digital fault recorders, PMU, etc. are being integrated by various vendors. Amongst, multipurpose platform (MPP) is a newly introduced electronic equipment that combines the abilities of a power quality (PQ) analyzer, an event logger, a PMU, and an inter-area oscillation identifier, all in one device [115]. The closed source of commercial PMU devices is perceived as an obstacle to emerging innovations in the synchrophasor development and application context. As an alternative, open platforms for the development of PMU technology specifically by university researchers have been proposed, amongst is OpenPMU [116]. The stochastic assessment of PMU availability is a crucial requirement due to the growing reliance on the WAMS infrastructure within the operation and control of power systems [117]–[122]. Besides, spoofing attacks on the GPS receiver of a PMU are a potential threat for the correct phase angle reporting of voltage or current measurements provided by the PMU [123]–[125]. Such spoofing attacks can induce serious malfunctions in control center applications, e.g. angular stability monitoring, relying on the phase information from measurements provided by PMUs. Recent investigations on blackouts have revealed the indispensable role of the malfunction of monitoring/control infrastructures. In many occasions, the consequence of a severe event could have been significantly reduced if the system operators had a relatively accurate situational awareness on the stressed power grid. Hence, the power system reliability assessment, which was previously being fulfilled with the assumption of complete observability and controllability, should be revised incorporating the SCADA or WAMS networks deficiencies [126]. Development of new applications to enhance the operation of the electric grid based on high-reported rate PMU data necessitates exploitation of high-bandwidth and networked communication systems. For any particular transmission grid, a comprehensive analysis to simulate, design, and test the adequacy of a communication and computation system is of an extreme importance [127]–[129]. Advanced comprehensive sampling techniques can be adopted to minimize communication bandwidth and delays while sending synchrophasors [130]. 1609

F. Aminifar et al.: SMT in Power Systems

III. CATEGORY 2: GENERIC INTRODUCTIONS OVER SMT, PMU, AND WAMS

Following the actualization of precise measurement devices, the first requirement for realizing the WAMS was the time synchronized sampling over an entire power system in order to simultaneously capture voltage and current phasor quantities at specific instants of time [131]. Although most communication systems such as leased lines, microwave, or AM radio broadcast were envisaged as potential means for the wide-area sampling synchronization, their accuracy levels were deemed too coarse for the practical usage [132]. The application of multiplexed fiber optics for the sampling synchronization purpose also suffered from insufficient precision [132]. In contrast, exploiting satellite signals transmitted by GPS or its Russians counterpart GLONAS was considered as a feasible solution [133]. The precise satellite signals available all over the world also let PMUs furnish the measured data with time tags denoting the exact time of the corresponding measurement. Having realized the wide-area sampling synchronization, preliminary successes of prototyped implemented systems were reported [134], [135], and a broad spectrum of PMU and WAMS applications was gradually opened up [136]–[138]. These judicious applications were recognized as effective helps in reducing the frequency and severity of catastrophic failures [139]. Moreover, the potential capabilities of PMU data in both local and system-wide perspectives were identified among various solutions to detect the initiation and propagation of severe disturbances and consequently to avert brownouts or even blackouts [140]. This enthusiasm was intensified by other basic facts consisting of (i) economic pressures on the electricity market and on the grid operators to maximally utilize the high voltage equipments, (ii) rather quick changes in the system operating conditions rendered by market-driven environments, and (iii) highlighted concerns for enhancing the physical security of power grids [141]. To achieve the aforementioned potential benefits, advancements in other areas such as WAMS structural architecture as well as control center hardware facilities and software packages were further focused to match with proven advancements in SMT, PMU manufacturing, and communication facilities. In addition to technical design issues [142]–[144], these efforts comprised a process of business justification of WAMS applications, a qualitative cost/benefit analysis with a particular emphasis on the beneficiaries, and a roadmap for WAMS implementations and its applications development [145]. To date, various publications have reported the evolution status of WAMS practical applications in different utilities and countries. Among them are North America [146]–[149], continental Europe [146], [147] Brazil [146], [147], China [146], [147], [150], India [146], [147], Mexico [146], Nordic countries [146], Russia [146], [147], Korea [151], British Colombia Transmission Corporation and British Colombia Hydro [152], and Bonneville Power

1610

Administration and Tennessee Valley Authority [153]. These reports revealed the maturity of the elementary local and system-wide SMT applications [154]–[156]. In contrast, more advanced functions of WAMS realizing smart transmission grids are still in conceptual stages [157], [158]. These functions could be categorized into two different classes: • Some applications, although are theoretically well developed, need widespread deployment of PMUs making the whole power network observable. • Others are practically in the infancy period and are currently under investigation and research. For the sake of illustration, a complete WAMS based state measurement (which is going to serve instead of SE) belongs to the first class and wide-area automatic control of power systems lies within the second one. Obviously, with the current high rate of PMU deployment, the first class applications would actualize in the near future; while the practicality of the second class depends on the further advancements in all power engineering, control strategies, communication facilities, and the information technology discipline. In this respect, there are some propositions consisting of a flexible integrated phasor system to offer transmission owners access to their phasor data [159], an IP-based decentralized and data centric information that can securely support the next generation grid [160], an adaptive routing algorithm over packet switching networks to guarantee the quality of service for the essential measured data [161], a novel cyber-physical model through a cooperative information exchange between the controllers embedded in the system and the network operator in future energy systems [162], and a set of strategies to protect the anonymity of synchrophasor data against passive traffic analysis attacks [163], [164]. The WAMS dependency on high-performance communication systems and the impact of ICT architecture on WAMS reliability were speculated likewise in the existing literature [165]–[170]. Due to the early high-cost PMU manufacturing process as well as its expensive installation costs in high voltage substations, the wide-area frequency monitoring network (FNET) was developed in 2003 as a low-cost and rapidly deployable alternative [171]. FNET’s building block is the frequency disturbance recorder (FDR), which is readily installable at the 120-V distribution level. This infrastructure is mainly to monitor the frequency of the network, and its potential is expectedly limited compared with the WAMS. Although FNET showed various advantages [172] in North America, it is not broadly deployed in other countries. This observation could be due to limited applications of FNET along with today’s lowered PMU manufacturing and installation expenses. IV. CATEGORY 3: PMU PLACEMENT TECHNIQUES

Optimal PMU Placement (OPP) problem was focused in early years after confirmation of WAMS potentials [173]. This task was known as an underlying requirement in effective and

VOLUME 2, 2014

F. Aminifar et al.: SMT in Power Systems

consistent developments of WAMS infrastructures. Though the OPP problem was justified in early stages by an emphasis on the considerable expenses of vast PMU installations, the overwhelming set of power system data associated with a large number of PMUs thereafter highlighted the OPP necessity more and more [141], [174]. The OPP is inherently an NP-complete problem with a solution space of 2N possible combinations for an N -bus electric power system [175]. Therefore, the OPP problem is considered as a combinatorial optimization problem and valuable research has been accomplished in this area since 1993 [173]. Although the reported works could be categorized based on the optimization methods employed, they are reviewed in the following with the viewpoint of problem definition and investigated technical aspects. A more comprehensive taxonomy of PMU placement methodologies was presented in [176]. Traditionally, the basic constraint of monitoring infrastructures was the holistic network and elements observability. In this sense, majority of OPP algorithms have considered the network base case observability as the optimization constraint. These efforts comprise a dual search algorithm along with simulated annealing [174], genetic algorithms (GA) [175], [177], the immunity GA [178], integer linear programming [179]–[181], weighted least squares algorithm [182], and recursive Tabu search method [183]. Further researches argued that the OPP problem might have multiple optimal solutions among which the one with maximum measurement redundancy is more desirable [184]–[187]. Such a solution, in essence, leads to a more precise SE and has higher robustness against element outages. Other efforts underlined the growing reliance of power system operation on the WAMS applications and having a more reliable and robust WAMS infrastructure. These works addressed the OPP problem with a set of constraints assuring the network complete observability at the event of transmission line and/or PMU outages [184], [185], [188]–[195]. Ensuring the network observability in both normal condition and controlled islanding mode was accommodated in the OPP problem as well [196]. Other sorts of technical constraints were also added to the OPP problem with an intended specific functionality such as fault location observability [197], bad data detection in SE [198], [199] parameter error identification [200], reducing the variances of the SE errors and increasing the local redundancy [201], enhancing topology error processing [202], defending against data injection attacks [164], generating the best estimate of the swing model [203], minimizing the error of SE [204]–[206], and optimizing a useful metric which accounts for three important requirements in power system state estimation: convergence, observability, and performance [207]. PMUs could also be strategically placed in power networks to offer the detection and identification of parameter error on a single-edge cutset (critical branch) or double-edge cutsets (critical branch pairs) [208]. Concurrent optimization of placement of PMUs and communication links is another suggestion for the systems in VOLUME 2, 2014

which the communication infrastructure is mainly expanded for the synchrophasors collection [209], [210]. In the technique proposed in [209], permanent and random intermittent PMU outages are taken into account and the steady-state availability of synchrophasor data at each bus meets a prescribed level. Optimizing the number and location of PMUs and smart metering devices in future active distribution networks is an urgently requested task [211]. Such a robust measurement infrastructure is essential for secure and optimal smart distribution grid control and operation. All of the aforementioned studies brought about a considerable evolution of the OPP algorithms. However, it would take a rather long time for the deployment of all PMUs required for the network basic/contingency-constrained observability. Hence, staging (phasing) the OPP in time was investigated as a pragmatic requirement [174], [212]–[215]. The multistage OPP was the name assigned to the envisaged problem. In these studies, determination of PMU placement schemes with a given limited depth-of-unobservability associated with subsidiary stages was aimed. These techniques were further extended by giving a higher priority to key buses such as those required for transient and dynamic stability monitoring and buses with high connectivity [216]. The OPP problem in either single- or multi-stage definition has also been tackled in probabilistic manners taking the probability of elements outages into account [120], [217]–[219]. More installation of PMU devices in a power network would assure higher levels of system security and electricity reliability. Having converted the reliability enhancement to monetary measures, the OPP problem can be analyzed within a cost/benefit framework [220]. The monitoring of power system dynamics with a few PMUs was another perspective of the OPP problem [221]–[224]. In this sense, dynamically coherent areas of a power system were determined. Thereafter, the sitting process of a given number of PMUs was performed with the objective of maximizing the information content of captured signals while minimizing their cross correlation. As the notion of phasors does not correspond to dc transmission circuits, the OPP problem in hybrid ac/dc systems should be accordingly revised [225]. Another practical aspect regarding the limitation of PMU measurement channels is letting the optimization algorithm to place more than one PMU in a given substation. This relaxation can be economically desirable due to some common expenses of installing two or more PMU devices in a same substation, such as communication infrastructure procurement. V. CATEGORY 4: STATE ESTIMATION (SE) CONSISTING OF OR BASED ON PMU DATA

Power systems were traditionally monitored through the supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) infrastructure and energy management system (EMS) installed at control centers. Remote terminal units (RTUs) located in 1611

F. Aminifar et al.: SMT in Power Systems

substations and power plants nourishes SCADA by their scalar data such as magnitude of voltage and current quantities, active and reactive powers, present settings of tap changing and phase shifting transformers, and breakers status. These raw datasets are refined by SE for reducing their errors, compensating for unavailable values, and eliminating bad data. The power system operators monitor and control the system with the help of SE programs embedded in EMSs. SMT helps conventional SE engines in two ways: • Its measurements are precisely synchronized and can significantly eliminate the effect of time skew error in the SE solution. • Its direct measurement of state variables, i.e., phase angles in addition to magnitudes, brings a remarkable enhancement in SE convergence and accuracy. In the context of PMU data application in SE, the preliminary tasks are focused on the inclusion of PMU data in the conventional SE program [226], [227]. Subsequently, various modified versions of the SE formulation were investigated to comprise the voltage and current phase angles in the estimation process of the system true state [228]–[242]. Observability/criticality analyses and bad data processing have also been revisited in the presence of PMU measurements [243], [244]. In SE algorithms, each measurement has a specific weight, which is inversely proportional to the uncertainty associated with the measurement. Hence, further research covered the computation of uncertainty associated with two types of PMU measurements, designated as direct measurement of quantities at the PMU-bus and indirect measurements of buses adjacent to the PMU-bus [245]. The other technical concern in adding the PMU data to the conventional SE algorithms arises from dissimilar reporting rates of SCADA and WAMS [246]. To overcome, the buffer length of PMU measurements should be optimally determined which can be also helpful in specifying the corresponding weights in SE [247]. The underlying attribute of the reliability of SE process, which is strongly dependent on the measurement redundancy, was also revised to account for the impact of PMU data [248]. Since in some PMUs it is observed that the voltage and current phasors exhibit phase biases, which degrade the conventional SE performance, phasor-data-based SE algorithms were proposed for phasor angle bias correction [249], [250]. The above techniques necessitated the revision of SE software packages; while the revised ones were still nonlinear and cumbersome to tackle. Other alternatives to include the additional PMU data in SE were developed in which the existing SE software was left in place with no modification [251], [252]. In this method, the solution of SE with traditional measurements is combined with PMU measurements in a post-processing linear estimator. Tracking SE to reconstruct coherent system states can be considerably enhanced by accommodation of PMU data [253]. Other research activities speculated the multi-area SE problem where PMUs, scattered in various control areas of a large-scale power system, improved the estimation 1612

accuracy and bad data processing efficiency [254]. Acceleration of a large-scale SE program as another vital challenge was considerably overcome by distributed SE algorithms in which PMUs were considered to coordinate the SE solution of each subsystem [201], [255]–[257]. The impact of conventional measurement failures on the SE performance was also comprehensively explored where the existence of even few PMUs was recognized very helpful in preserving the SE performance [258]. SCADA scans RTU every 2-5 seconds. Hence, the inclusion of PMU data in the traditional SE, although is able to improve its reliability and accuracy, does not alleviate the SCADA slow and quasi-stationary images over the system status. It is expected that future WAMSs with plenary PMUs would directly measure all state variables and the conventional notion of SE may not exist anymore. These programs with trivial computations will provide a dynamic view of the network under supervision. This assumption was made in few works comprising the calculation of state variable uncertainty in a PMU-based SE algorithm [259], the SE-based line outage detection with only PMU data [260], [261], SE of a system whose parameters are known to be within certain tolerance bounds [262], and comparing some various SE formulations [263]. PMU devices might be synchronized with each other using a precision time protocol (PTP), defined in the standard IEEE 1588, particularly in substations where the series of IEC 61850 standards have been introduced. The impact of this synchronization solution on the measurements quality was examined by applying a SE procedure. It was shown that the accuracy of synchrophasor measurements meets the values usually required for application in power system SE [264]. Distribution class SE for application in smart distribution grids is a new research topic where the SE is customarily formulated in three-phase fashion tailored to the unbalanced operation of distribution systems. The wide deployment of synchrophasor measurements throughout the feeders can bring about remarkable improvements in the distribution system SE performance [265]–[268]. With the waveform recording capability of nowadays PMU devices (fault recording functionality), the harmonic snapshot of power system turns out to be feasible. These harmonic data can thereafter nourish harmonic SE algorithm which was recently revised based on harmonic phasor data [269]. VI. CATEGORY 5: MODEL VALIDATION, CALIBRATION, AND EXTRACTION VIA PMU DATA

Along with the growing complexities of power systems, rendered by the market-driven operation and integration of intermittent energy resources, the simulation becomes the only means to understand the behavior of such a huge system. The power system operators and planners require realistic component and system models in simulations to take proper decisions in operation processes and planning studies. By the time of installation of primary PMUs, pragmatic observations VOLUME 2, 2014

F. Aminifar et al.: SMT in Power Systems

revealed a noticeable difference between the simulation results and real-world outcomes captured by PMUs [270]. Accordingly, one of the early-realized applications of PMU data was introduced as the improvement of the component and system dynamic and steady-state models for both on-line and off-line analyses. Following to observations on inaccuracy of the existing models, considerable research activities were dedicated to the problem of model verification and correction based on PMU data. These works used a large library of disturbance recordings to eliminate single event abnormalities and led to revisions of some hydro turbine-governor models [270] and power plant/generator dynamic models and states [271]–[274]. Finding the erroneous components in a complex and large-scale power system with thousands of elements was renowned as a challenging endeavor and further WAMS-based simulation validation works were conducted [275]. Additionally, PMU measurements were utilized to validate models of fixed speed induction generatorbased or converter-based wind farms during frequency transients [276], [277]. These efforts mainly focused on the validation of dynamic models of components because PMUs can record the synchrophasors during the dynamics, something which was not feasible before. Application of PMU measurements in the error identification of steady-state models of other components, such as transmission lines, revealed a significant enhancement too [278], [279]. In addition to the validation and correction of component models, some research efforts were devoted to the identification of the power system equivalent model. The realtime PMU data were employed to build the equivalent model of the power system for transient stability control through flexible AC transmission system (FACTS) devices [280]. A similar effort to develop an HVDC model for online stability monitoring of the integrated ac/dc systems has been carried out as well [281]. Estimating a reduced model to represent the inter-area dynamics of power systems was also investigated by PMU measurements [282]–[284]. The method elaborated in [282] was then generalized to incorporate the effect of intermediate dynamic voltage control equipments, such as static VAr compensator (SVC) and synchronous condenser [285]. Recent research efforts in this area were devoted to the PMU-based identification of grid impedance matrices, which are necessary for the monitoring and protection of modern power systems [286] and Thevenin equivalent parameters [287]. The developed methods made the dynamic tracking of parameter changes a viable capability. In other works, online identification of parameters associated with the power system equivalent was investigated using the phase-plane trajectories of PMU measured variables [288], or by the application of subspace system identification techniques [289]. Tracking the system dynamic response to generator tripping events is another superior capability of synchrophasors in real-world practices [290]. Power systems dynamic responses cannot be assertively simulated unless accurate load models are available. VOLUME 2, 2014

System-wide load modeling in the transmission and sub-transmission levels is heading toward the application of WAMS synchronized data. The major reason for this tendency is the high resolution of PMU data with phase angle information. Modelers intend to achieve more accurate models of components and the system, and they usually exploit complex and data-mining-based black box models. On the opposite side, model users which are system operators and planners seek transparent and interpretable models for decision making processes and post-event studies. To this end, a compromised state of transparency versus accuracy of the models should be sought [291]. VII. CATEGORY 6: FAULT/EVENT DETECTION AND LOCATION BY PMU DATA

Electric power grids, in transmission and distribution levels, are always prone to faults caused by a variety of situations such as equipment failures, accidents, adverse weather, etc. In faulted power systems, either the system is at risk in which the customers’ electricity service is interrupted or the system security is seriously threatened while its entire demands are still being served. Accordingly, precise and fast detection and location of network faults were historically perceived as a crucial task in the system inspection, maintenance, and repair processes. Note that application of phasor quantities in power system protection goes back several years earlier than the PMU emergence; its review is therefore out of the scope of this paper. Here, merely the efforts in which the application of PMU data has been explicitly declared are reviewed. PMUs deployed at transmission line ends, in addition to positive, negative, or zero sequence phasors, compute three-phase values of bus voltage and line current as well. Furthermore, the sampling clocks of various PMUs, located several kilometers away, are precisely synchronized. These features of PMU outputs actualized an advanced fault detection and location algorithm, which has an adaptive inherent and an ample robustness against system noise and measurement errors [292], [293]. Additionally, the deviation in line parameters caused by simplified calculation methods, ambient temperature, or aging phenomena, was eliminated by an effective estimation technique based on the PMU accurate data available at both ends of transmission lines [292], [293]. These efforts, which were devised for the situation of having permanent faults, were next revised for arcing transient faults [294], [295]. Furthermore, the proposed algorithms in [292] and [293] were further extended and tailored for three-terminal and N-terminal (N≥3) transmission lines [296]–[298]. Fault detection and location in multi-terminal transmission lines were focused by other research activities too [299]–[304]. Wide-area synchrophasor data collected from many PMUs are materializing the system-wide fault diagnosis and location algorithms [305]. The crucial task of fault detection and location was explored by a multistate network inference in which phase 1613

F. Aminifar et al.: SMT in Power Systems

angles across the buses were modeled through a Markov random field [306]. It was also argued that when a power system is under dynamic conditions, such as power oscillations, the fault voltage and current cannot be expressed as standard sinusoidal functions [307]. Hence, a fault location estimator was devised in which the voltage and current waveforms were considered as time-variant signals whose magnitude and frequency are changing against time. Fault detection and location in parallel transmission lines, as a common practical configuration, were known as a more complicated problem due to some phenomena such as mutual coupling effect, shunt capacitance, etc. Algorithms based on PMU data demonstrated acceptable performances for parallel transmission lines in either transposed or untransposed arrangements [308], [309]. Series compensation of transmission lines has always been desired for some advantages such as the increasing power transfer capability, controlling the network power flow, damping dynamic oscillations, etc. Since the voltage drop of a series device is unknown during fault periods, the protection of series-compensated transmission lines has been a challenging subject to date. PMU measurements at both ends of transmission lines offered a great potential for detection and location of seriescompensated lines without requiring the voltage drop values based on the compensation device model [310]. Although transmission line parameters are required in some techniques, PMU data can be directly used for online estimation of series-compensated line parameters and Thevenin’s equivalent of the system to ensure considering the actual operating conditions [311]. Phasor estimation algorithms embedded in PMU devices offer calculation of signal harmonic contents up to higher orders. This information, along with the symmetrical component data, was known very helpful in fault detection and location of transmission lines as well as in discrimination between permanent and transient faults [312]. This discrimination can be used in blocking reclosing of transmission lines when permanent faults occur. The majority of the aforementioned works used voltage and current measurements at one or both ends of transmission lines. In another research, it was criticized that PMU current inputs are usually fed through the protection cores of current transformers; hence, the accuracy of PMU current measurements might be inadequate for a precise fault location. This work, assuming a given bus admittance matrix at the time of fault, has developed a new fault detection and location approach which uses only PMU voltage measurements [313]. This approach is applicable in both transposed and untransposed transmission lines and was then extended for multi-terminal lines [314]. The existing algorithms, although achieve a high accuracy in locating faults, necessitate a broad deployment of PMUs which is not the case in many designed WAMS networks or at least in the transition period toward a plenary WAMS infrastructure. Therefore, a fault-location algorithm based on fewer voltage measurements for large-scale transmission networks has been 1614

proposed which can be promising due to its low cost and practicality [315]. Phasor measurements could also be utilized in order to unveil power-line outages which is extremely vital not only to prevent cascaded events but even for routine monitoring and control tasks in smart power system control centers [316]–[320]. Due to relatively large capacitance values in underground cables, the detection and location of their faults were deemed to be of technical difficulties compared to overhead transmission lines. PMU measurements, including voltage and current phasors at a single end of a cable, were employed as well in an efficient fault location algorithm [321]. Likewise, two-terminal multi-section compound transmission lines, which combine overhead lines with underground power cables, suffer from effective protection solutions. These compound transmission lines are usually adopted to achieve a compromise between construction cost and environmental concerns. PMU data proposes powerful algorithms to locate a fault; no matter the fault is on the overhead line or underground power cable [322]. A dominant portion of electricity interruptions is originated by the distribution system failures. Accurate locating of faulted segments can significantly expedite the dispatch of repair crews and restoration process. However, this task is getting more difficult with modernization of distribution grids by growing penetration of distributed energy resources. Synchrophasor measurements, with superior resolution and accuracy attributes, offer a practical and effective solution to this challenge [323]. While a dynamic event can be initiated by a fault in the transmission network, it may be caused by tripping a generator or switching a transmission line in or out. In addition to the fault, the PMU data has demonstrated a salient potential for event detection and location. A method was devised for detection and location of generator trips based on generator rotor angle measurements obtained using PMU data [324]. Unintentional islanding is among power system disturbances in which a part of the network becomes isolated from the rest. PMU phase angle measurements and frequency estimations are of great values for timely detection of islanding events [325], [326]. Additionally, PMU data revealed prosperous outcomes in locating disturbance sources for low-frequency oscillations in a real-world application [327]. Along with the quick proliferation of synchrophasor data and recordings, advanced and intelligent techniques are being proposed with the purpose of single/multiple events/faults early detection and clustering [328]–[330]. VIII. CATEGORY 7: WAMS-BASED DYNAMIC/STABILITY MONITORING AND PREDICTION

Today’s SCADA systems are neither fast enough to track dynamic events nor capable to monitor key stability indicators such as phase angles. Besides, computation of phase angles with SE algorithms is a time consuming process and is executed every several minutes. Since the advent of WAMS infrastructure, its salient feature in furnishing control centers VOLUME 2, 2014

F. Aminifar et al.: SMT in Power Systems

with real-time dynamic situational awareness has remarkably advanced the power system frequency/voltage stability monitoring and prediction. Real-world evidences and laboratorybased platforms have, thus far, confirmed such expected advancements [331]–[340]; nonetheless, undergoing research and development activities around the world would lead to forthcoming supplementary advancements and achievements. Primary research in this is focused on the application of PMU data in determining whether an evolving event will eventually be stable or unstable. Most of the transient stability assessment techniques, while simple in off-line applications, are too complicated for real-time uses. Decision trees, as a type of classifier that can be constructed off-line from a training set of examples, were used to classify a transient swing as either stable or unstable on the basis of real-time PMU data [341]–[343]. Moreover, similar efforts were conducted based on the largest windowed Lyapunov exponent index [344], [345], clustering estimation integration along with a reduced-order modeling [344], [346], decoupled PQ integration [347], artificial neural networks (ANN) [348], fuzzy neural networks [349], ball-on-concave-surface mechanics system [288], support vector machine classifier [350], [351], unscented Kalman filter [351], and derivative of total angle separation index [277]. Historically, power system operations have been challenged by stability margins, and dynamic stability (security) assessment has been a vital function for operation centers. Application of PMU data in this context was widely investigated and various practical experiences across the world demonstrated its effectiveness and worth. Among pioneer works was the use of a time-frequency-based approach to classify the contingencies with respect to the loss of voltage or frequency stability [353]. Other research on the analysis, discrimination, interpretation, and visualization of wide-area PMU measurements suited for dynamic phenomena was conducted through various methods including the numerical algorithm for subspace state space system identification [354], recursive adaptive stochastic subspace identification [355], Hilbert technique [356], energy function method [357], empirical mode decomposition approach [358], [359], hybrid DFT, finite-impulse response, prototype algorithm, and least-square error methods [360], decision trees [361]–[365], regression analysis [366], autoregressive moving average model [367], correlation and autocorrelation functions analysis [368], [369], correlation and partitioning around medoid clustering [370], regularized robust recursive least squares method [371], wavelet shrinkage analysis [359], adaptive sampling Prony analysis [372], a model-based approach suited for unbalanced power systems [373], and a characteristic ellipsoid technique [374]. As a crucial function, monitoring of inter-area oscillations through the real-time PMU data and estimation of oscillation and damping characteristics were broadly investigated as well [375]–[383]. Identification of dominant inter-area oscillation paths is another rigorous task VOLUME 2, 2014

which can be simply executed from ambient measurement of PMUs [327], [384]. Determination of security regions requires computational efforts which grow dramatically with the number of critical parameters to be evaluated. This difficulty could be tackled by advanced boundary search methods based on PMU information [385]. The generator coherency determination in an interarea oscillation, which is based on the estimation of generator rotor angle and speed variables [386], [387], was suited for online applications based on WAMS infrastructure [388]. Additionally, voltage across an area of a network is a notion to capture synchrophasor measurements at the border buses and is used to monitor area stress and whether line trips occur or not [389]. Voltage instability, caused by either an unexpected raise in the load level or a loss of an important transmission line or generator, has been concerned for many decades as the origin of several collapses in many countries. The majority of techniques developed for voltage security monitoring (VSM) were usually computationally cumbersome for on-line applications. However, real-time PMU-data realized the on-line VSM techniques, which were mostly based on the artificial intelligence methods such as fuzzy neural networks [390]. It was also discovered that the voltage stability margins derived on the basis of a constant-power load may be pessimistic for the systems with mixed load types including the voltage-sensitive loads. For such situations, the wide-area PMU data showed that voltage phasors contain enough information to detect the voltage stability margin directly from their measurements [381], [391]–[396]. Further research activities were also dedicated to this area, including the application of Tellegen’s theorem to determine Thevenin’s parameters [397], decision trees [342], [398], [399], algebraic modeling of the system trajectory [400], [401], ANNs [402], and a network decoupling transformation [403]. One of essential tools for network security monitoring is the N −1 contingency analysis. The associated results help system operators specify whether or not the power system will remain intact at the event of single-order contingencies. In case of any probable violation, the operator needs to apply a set of preventive actions such as generation re-dispatch. Resulted by computational burden of repeated power flow studies, contingency analysis is usually fulfilled through linear-sensitivity distribution factors (DFs), such as injection shift factors, power transfer distribution factors, and line outage distribution factors. Conventionally, DFs are computed by model-based approaches and might not absolutely correspond to the system real situations. Instead, wide-area PMU data actualize near real-time computation of adaptive DFs [404]. IX. CATEGORY 8: WAMS-BASED CONTROL STRATEGIES

Succeeding monitoring, trending, and prediction of transient, dynamic, and voltage stability metrics, proper control and remedial actions are to be taken in time for preserving the power system security and averting major supply interruptions. PMU measurements are instantaneous 1615

F. Aminifar et al.: SMT in Power Systems

and have a high resolution; hence, they can be used to take local/centralized corrective/preventive control actions for transient, dynamic, and voltage stability, as well as thermal constraints [405]–[407]. It is worth noting that the standard message format of PMU and PDC data, described in the IEEE standard C37.118, has a command type which can convey the control signals toward the PMU locations. This category has the least mature suite of applications and presently very few WAMS-based control applications are in use. Any malfunction of automated controls could produce unintended consequences for grid operations. Prosperous deployments of these controls require rigorous control system engineering with approved robustness under a variety of operating conditions, controller tuning and testing, controller self-diagnostics, etc. However, with the enduring research and development activities, the deployment of WAMS-based controls on a wider scale is anticipated in the near future. Comprehensive simulation platforms, such as secure operation of sustainable power systems which offers real-time simulations in closed-loop, are essentially requested for hastening the validation process of wide-area applications [408]. One practical challenge, which has been ignored in majority of research activities, belongs to the signal latencies in the wide-area control. This attribute can degrade or even deteriorate the performance of control systems and has to be accounted for in studies and implementations. For a long time, it was well perceived that quick measurements in the early stage of a disturbance would estimate its behind transient energy, and a quick control action, e.g., generation dropping or switching, could counteract the disturbance and stabilize the system. Primary research revealed that the transient energy could be quantified through PMU measurements for activating control actions [409], [410]. Applying wide-area PMU measurements to solve special dynamic stability problems is very intricate. In the last decade, an extensive research body was dedicated to this context. Developing a decentralized/hierarchical control approach with significant advantages of reliability and flexibility for inter-area oscillatory modes was among the pioneers [411]. Improving power system dynamic performance was also testified by means of WAMS-based controllers of automatic voltage regulators (AVRs) [107], [412], power system stabilizers (PSSs) [413], high-voltage DC (HVDC) transmission lines [414]–[417] FACTS devices [418]–[424], energy storage devices [413], [417], [423], [424], variablespeed wind farms [425], or doubly-fed induction generator (DFIG) wind farms [426]. Some research efforts were dedicated for designing control systems compensating for the communication limited bandwidth and latencies in feedback and command signals [415], [422], [427]–[435]. Wide-area power system damping controllers resilient to communication failures have also been researched and effectively accomplished [436], [437]. In terms of voltage security control, the PMU data was utilized and revealed a great enhancement in steering the power system away from the critical points of the voltage 1616

collapse [438]. This vital task was done by activation of available reactive-power reserves [391], [439], freezing of tap changers [391], adjusting shunt power electronic devices such as SVCs and active/hybrid filters [440], or integrating dynamic voltage restorers [441]. With the raising interest to deploy PMU devices in the future distribution networks, the volt/var control of feeders would be accordingly heightened [442]. Another achievement in the field of WAMS-based control is related to the virtual synchronous islanded operation of an isolated grid while it is not electrically connected to the main network [443]–[446]. Since the island is held in synchronism, its reconnection to the main system can be performed at any time with minimum transient effects and with no potential out-of-synchronism damages. Following to any power system black or brownout, the restoration strategies should be taken in use whose main objective is to maximize the restored demand in the shortest period of time. Three different stages of restoration efforts are conceived as black-start of generating units, network reenergizing, and load restoration. SMT can be of a great assistance in either of above stages by accelerating the processes, optimizing the paths, and limiting unsuccessful tries. A sectionalizing method for the build-up strategy in power system restoration is among effective solutions in which each island is preserved fully observable by means of PMU measurements [447]. The amount of restorable load is essential in the proper design of the restoration process and sequences. This task can be promisingly conducted by the access to WAMS data [448]. It should be also noted that due to the limited number of switching devices, the restorable load has a discrete nature and this feature should be necessarily accounted for in the load restoration processes. X. CATEGORY 9: WAMS-BASED PROTECTION SCHEMES

Recent operational challenges imposed on transmission networks, raised by the restructuring, the intermittent renewable energy resources, series compensation, and highly loaded transmission systems, dictate an evolution in system and component protection wisdoms. The advent of SMT along with computer-based relaying proposed another dimension, namely protection, to the field of WAMS-based applications. Special protection schemes (SPSs), remedial action schemes, and modern adaptive protection algorithms were proposed as direct consequences of integration of communication and protection systems [449], [450]. PMU measurements led to the enhancement of dependability and security of the traditional protection methods, development of adaptive auto reclosing schemes [451], as well as protection schemes based on data-mining [452]. It was also argued that backup protection systems with only local measurements can malfunction when the system is highly stressed, and widearea PMU data can significantly promote their performances [453]–[456]. Additionally, the real-time design and operation of system intentional islanding in the face of a potential cascade was realized with the help of PMU data [457]–[459]. VOLUME 2, 2014

F. Aminifar et al.: SMT in Power Systems

To counteract the system instability, splitting the system into islands is an effective remedial action scheme (RAS) enabled by wide-area synchrophasor data [348]. It has to be emphasized that the most critical barrier against implementation of many theoretically-proven protection algorithms is the signaling latency whose trend is continuously lessening with the advancements in communication and processing technologies and deployment of dedicated communication media. Early efforts for applying PMU data in the field of power system protection regarded the development of adaptive out-of-step relaying to make the relay blocking and tripping settings more attuned to the prevailing system conditions [460], [461]. Further research extended the PMU-based protection paradigm for the distance protection [462]–[464], the current differential protection of multi-terminal and series-compensated lines [465]–[467], the precise discrimination of in-zone or out-of-zone faults [468], and the overhead line protection accounting for the arc resistance [469]. Also, PMU data enhanced the fault type detection by means of the parameter fitting method or ANNs [14]. Load shedding at particular load buses is recognized as the last but effective resort in sustaining the system continuity after a frequency, angular, or voltage instability threat [391], [470]. Two major load shedding schemes are based on under-frequency and under-voltage criteria. Traditionally, these schemes are designed and operate independently from each other. Due to intrinsic coupling of frequency and voltage anomalies and their probable coincidence, it however makes more sense to have an integrated scheme for voltage and frequency load shedding. PMU data from different areas of a power system are helpful in the adaptive integrated frequency and voltage load shedding scheme [471], [472]. Although deployment of PMU devices in distribution systems, because of very close phase angles in a given distribution network, does make less sense, their capability in synchronized measurements and calculation of signal harmonic contents resulted in some research efforts. The development of PMU-based adaptive protection schemes for distribution systems with high penetration of distributed generation has demonstrated satisfactory outcomes [473]. XI. CONCLUSIONS

This paper presents a comprehensive survey on the subject of SMT and its relevant issues and applications. Since the presence of omissions is bound to be there, the authors would like to apologize for any errors or omissions and hope that additional references will be advanced as discussion to this paper. This bibliography illuminates the current engineering wisdom pertaining to advanced sets of PMU and WAMS applications. Presently, a clear consensus is heading toward the WAMS-based dynamic/stability monitoring, trending and prediction, automated control strategies, and wide-area special protection schemes. Such advancements will provide the tools for monitoring, protection, and control of emerging modern power systems in the smart grid paradigm. VOLUME 2, 2014

REFERENCES [1] A. G. Phadke, J. S. Thorp, and M. G. Adamiak, ‘‘A new measurement technique for tracking voltage phasors, local system frequency, and rate of change of frequency,’’ IEEE Trans. Power App. Syst., vol. PAS-102, no. 5, pp. 1025–1038, May 1983. [2] M. M. Begovic, P. M. Djuric, S. Dunlap, and A. G. Phadke, ‘‘Frequency tracking in power networks in the presence of harmonics,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 480–486, Apr. 1993. [3] T. Lobos and J. Rezmer, ‘‘Real-time determination of power system frequency,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 877–881, Aug. 1997. [4] R. Agha Zadeh, A. Ghosh, G. Ledwich, and F. Zare, ‘‘Analysis of phasor measurement method in tracking the power frequency of distorted signals,’’ IET Generat., Transmiss. Distrib., vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 759–769, Jul. 2010. [5] P. Romano and M. Paolone, ‘‘Enhanced interpolated-DFT for synchrophasor estimation in FPGAs: Theory, implementation, and validation of a PMU prototype,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 63, no. 12, pp. 2824–2836, Dec. 2014. [6] H. C. Wood, N. G. Johnson, and M. S. Sachdev, ‘‘Kalman filtering applied to power system measurements relaying,’’ IEEE Trans. Power App. Syst., vol. PAS-104, no. 12, pp. 3565–3573, Dec. 1985. [7] A. A. Girgis and W. L. Peterson, ‘‘Adaptive estimation of power system frequency deviation and its rate of change for calculating sudden power system overloads,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 585–594, Apr. 1990. [8] V. Eckhardt, P. Hippe, and G. Hosemann, ‘‘Dynamic measuring of frequency and frequency oscillations in multiphase power systems,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 95–102, Jan. 1989. [9] R. W. Menzies and G. B. Mazur, ‘‘Advances in the determination of control parameters for static compensators,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 2012–2017, Oct. 1989. [10] J. L. Pinto de Sa and L. Pedro, ‘‘Modal Kalman filtering based impedance relaying,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 78–84, Jan. 1991. [11] I. Kamwa, M. Leclerc, and D. McNabb, ‘‘Performance of demodulationbased frequency measurement algorithms used in typical PMUs,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 505–514, Apr. 2004. [12] Z. Yao, ‘‘Fundamental phasor calculation with short delay,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1280–1287, Jul. 2008. [13] V. V. Terzija, N. B. Djuric, and B. D. Kovacevic, ‘‘Voltage phasor and local system frequency estimation using Newton type algorithm,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1368–1374, Jul. 1994. [14] A. Poeltl and K. Frohlich, ‘‘Two new methods for very fast fault type detection by means of parameter fitting and artificial neural networks,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1269–1275, Oct. 1999. [15] F. Badrkhani Ajaei, M. Sanaye-Pasand, M. Davarpanah, A. Rezaei-Zare, and R. Iravani, ‘‘Compensation of the current-transformer saturation effects for digital relays,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 2531–2540, Oct. 2011. [16] D. Dotta and J. H. Chow, ‘‘Second harmonic filtering in phasor measurement estimation,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 1240–1241, Apr. 2013. [17] T. Routtenberg and L. Tong, ‘‘Joint frequency and phasor estimation under the KCL constraint,’’ IEEE Signal Process. Lett., vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 575–578, Jun. 2013. [18] R. K. Mai, Z. Y. He, L. Fu, B. Kirby, and Z. Q. Bo, ‘‘A dynamic synchrophasor estimation algorithm for online application,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 570–578, Apr. 2010. [19] J. A. de la O Serna, ‘‘Synchrophasor estimation using Prony’s method,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 62, no. 8, pp. 2119–2128, Aug. 2013. [20] T. T. Nguyen and X. J. Li, ‘‘Application of a z-transform signal model and median filtering for power system frequency and phasor measurements,’’ IET Generat., Transmiss. Distrib., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 72–79, Jan. 2007. [21] I. Kamwa, R. Grondin, V. K. Sood, C. Gagnon, V. T. Nguyen, and J. Mereb, ‘‘Recurrent neural networks for phasor detection and adaptive identification in power system control and protection,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 657–664, Apr. 1996. [22] I. Sadinezhad and V. G. Agelidis, ‘‘Slow sampling online optimization approach to estimate power system frequency,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 265–277, Jun. 2011. [23] M. Karimi-Ghartemani, B.-T. Ooi, and A. Bakhshai, ‘‘Application of enhanced phase-locked loop system to the computation of synchrophasors,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 22–32, Jan. 2011. 1617

F. Aminifar et al.: SMT in Power Systems

[24] P. K. Dash, K. R. Krishnanand, and M. Padhee, ‘‘Fast recursive Gauss–Newton adaptive filter for the estimation of power system frequency and harmonics in a noisy environment,’’ IET Generat., Transmiss. Distrib., vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 1277–1289, Dec. 2011. [25] P. K. Dash and S. Hasan, ‘‘A fast recursive algorithm for the estimation of frequency, amplitude, and phase of noisy sinusoid,’’ IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 58, no. 10, pp. 4847–4856, Oct. 2011. [26] J. A. de la O, H. J. Altuve, and I. Diaz, ‘‘A new digital filter for phasor computation. I. Theory [power system protection],’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1026–1031, Aug. 1998. [27] H. J. Altuve, I. Diaz, and J. A. de la O, ‘‘A new digital filter for phasor computation. II. Evaluation [power system protection],’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1032–1037, Aug. 1998. [28] J. A. de la O, ‘‘New family of digital filters for phasor computation,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 86–91, Jan. 2000. [29] J. A. de la O Serna and K. E. Martin, ‘‘Improving phasor measurements under power system oscillations,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 160–166, Feb. 2003. [30] J. A. de la O Serna, ‘‘Reducing the delay of phasor estimates under power system oscillations,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 2271–2278, Dec. 2007. [31] T. Lin and A. Domijan, ‘‘Recursive algorithm for real-time measurement of electrical variables in power systems,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 15–22, Jan. 2006. [32] T. Lin and A. D. Jun, ‘‘Novel complex filter with recursive algorithm for phasor computation in power-quality monitoring,’’ IET Generat., Transmiss. Distrib., vol. 153, no. 3, pp. 283–290, May 2006. [33] M. D. Kusljevic, ‘‘Adaptive resonator-based method for power system harmonic analysis,’’ IET Sci., Meas. Technol., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 177–185, May 2008. [34] I. Kamwa, A. K. Pradhan, and G. Joos, ‘‘Adaptive phasor and frequencytracking schemes for wide-area protection and control,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 744–753, Apr. 2011. [35] J. A. de la O Serna and J. Rodríguez-Maldonado, ‘‘Instantaneous oscillating phasor estimates with Taylor K -Kalman filters,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 2336–2344, Nov. 2011. [36] J. A. de la O Serna and J. Rodríguez-Maldonado, ‘‘Taylor–Kalman– Fourier filters for instantaneous oscillating phasor and harmonic estimates,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 941–951, Apr. 2012. [37] J. K. Hwang and P. N. Markham, ‘‘Power system frequency estimation by reduction of noise using three digital filters,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 402–409, Feb. 2014. [38] I. Kamwa, S. R. Samantaray, and G. Joos, ‘‘Wide frequency range adaptive phasor and frequency PMU algorithms,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 569–579, Mar. 2014. [39] J. K. Hwang, ‘‘Reduction of noise in measurements of phasor angles by using two digital filters,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 52–60, Feb. 2004. [40] J.-Z. Yang and C.-W. Liu, ‘‘A precise calculation of power system frequency and phasor,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 494–499, Apr. 2000. [41] J.-Z. Yang and C.-W. Liu, ‘‘A precise calculation of power system frequency,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 361–366, Jul. 2001. [42] D. Fan and V. Centeno, ‘‘Phasor-based synchronized frequency measurement in power systems,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 2010–2016, Oct. 2007. [43] P. Zhang, H. Xue, and R. Yang, ‘‘Shifting window average method for accurate frequency measurement in power systems,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 2887–2889, Oct. 2011. [44] P. Zhang, H. Xue, R. Yang, and J. Zhang, ‘‘Shifting window average method for phasor measurement at offnominal frequencies,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 1063–1073, Jun. 2004. [45] M. Akke and J. S. Thorp, ‘‘Sample value adjustment improves phasor estimation at off-nominal frequencies,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 2255–2263, Oct. 2010. [46] C.-S. Yu, ‘‘A discrete Fourier transform-based adaptive mimic phasor estimator for distance relaying applications,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1836–1846, Oct. 2006. [47] M. R. Dadash Zadeh and Z. Zhang, ‘‘A new DFT-based current phasor estimation for numerical protective relaying,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 2172–2179, Oct. 2013. 1618

[48] A. Rahmati and R. Adhami, ‘‘An accurate filtering technique to mitigate transient decaying DC offset,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 966–968, Apr. 2014. [49] R. K. Mai, L. Fu, Z. Y. Dong, B. Kirby, and Z. Q. Bo, ‘‘An adaptive dynamic phasor estimator considering DC offset for PMU applications,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1744–1754, Jul. 2011. [50] S.-R. Nam, J.-Y. Park, S.-H. Kang, and M. Kezunovic, ‘‘Phasor estimation in the presence of DC offset and CT saturation,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 1842–1849, Oct. 2009. [51] Z. Jiang, S. Miao, and P. Liu, ‘‘A modified empirical mode decomposition filtering-based adaptive phasor estimation algorithm for removal of exponentially decaying DC offset,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 1326–1334, Jun. 2014. [52] R. K. Mai, L. Fu, Z. Y. Dong, K. P. Wong, Z. Q. Bo, and H. B. Xu, ‘‘Dynamic phasor and frequency estimators considering decaying DC components,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 671–681, May 2012. [53] R. Rubeena, M. R. D. Zadeh, and T. P. S. Bains, ‘‘An accurate offline phasor estimation for fault location in series-compensated lines,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 876–883, Apr. 2014. [54] J. A. de la O Serna, ‘‘Phasor estimation from phasorlets,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 134–143, Feb. 2005. [55] J. A. de la O Serna, ‘‘Reducing the error in phasor estimates from phasorlets in fault voltage and current signals,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 856–866, Jun. 2007. [56] J. Ren and M. Kezunovic, ‘‘Real-time power system frequency and phasors estimation using recursive wavelet transform,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1392–1402, Jul. 2011. [57] J. Ren and M. Kezunovic, ‘‘An adaptive phasor estimator for power system waveforms containing transients,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 735–745, Apr. 2012. [58] J. A. de la Serna, ‘‘Dynamic phasor estimates for power system oscillations,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 1648–1657, Oct. 2007. [59] W. Premerlani, B. Kasztenny, and M. Adamiak, ‘‘Development and implementation of a synchrophasor estimator capable of measurements under dynamic conditions,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 109–123, Jan. 2008. [60] F. Badrkhani Ajaei, M. Sanaye-Pasand, M. Davarpanah, A. Rezaei-Zare, and R. Iravani, ‘‘Mitigating the impacts of CCVT subsidence transients on the distance relay,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 497–505, Apr. 2012. [61] S. Das and T. Sidhu, ‘‘A simple synchrophasor estimation algorithm considering IEEE standard C37.118.1-2011 and protection requirements,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 62, no. 10, pp. 2704–2715, Oct. 2013. [62] M. A. Platas-Garza and J. A. de la O Serna, ‘‘Dynamic phasor and frequency estimates through maximally flat differentiators,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 1803–1811, Jul. 2010. [63] A. T. Muoz and J. A. de la O Serna, ‘‘Shanks’ method for dynamic phasor estimation,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 813–819, Apr. 2008. [64] R. K. Mai, Z. Y. He, L. Fu, W. He, and Z. Q. Bo, ‘‘Dynamic phasor and frequency estimator for phasor measurement units,’’ IET Generat., Transmiss. Distrib., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 73–83, Jan. 2010. [65] P. Banerjee and S. C. Srivastava, ‘‘A subspace-based dynamic phasor estimator for synchrophasor application,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 61, no. 9, pp. 2436–2445, Sep. 2012. [66] J. C.-H. Peng and N. C. Nair, ‘‘Enhancing Kalman filter for tracking ringdown electromechanical oscillations,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 1042–1050, May 2012. [67] H. Xue, D. Song, and R. Yang, ‘‘Consecutive DFT method for instantaneous oscillating phasor measurement,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 4634–4644, Nov. 2013. [68] A. J. Roscoe, I. F. Abdulhadi, and G. M. Burt, ‘‘P and M class phasor measurement unit algorithms using adaptive cascaded filters,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 1447–1459, Jul. 2013. [69] P. Castello, J. Liu, C. Muscas, P. A. Pegoraro, F. Ponci, and A. Monti, ‘‘A fast and accurate PMU algorithm for P+M class measurement of synchrophasor and frequency,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 63, no. 12, pp. 2837–2845, Dec. 2014. [70] M. A. Platas-Garza and J. A. de la O Serna, ‘‘Polynomial implementation of the Taylor–Fourier transform for harmonic analysis,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 63, no. 12, pp. 2846–2854, Dec. 2014. VOLUME 2, 2014

F. Aminifar et al.: SMT in Power Systems

[71] D. Petri, D. Fontanelli, and D. Macii, ‘‘A frequency-domain algorithm for dynamic synchrophasor and frequency estimation,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 63, no. 10, pp. 2330–2340, Oct. 2014. [72] L. F. Sanchez-Gomez and J. A. de la O Serna, ‘‘Dynamic phasor estimates under the Bellman’s principle of optimality: The Taylor-LQG-Fourier filters,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 3137–3147, Dec. 2013. [73] T. Xia and Y. Liu, ‘‘Single-phase phase angle measurements in electric power systems,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 844–852, May 2010. [74] J. Nutaro and V. Protopopescu, ‘‘Calculating frequency at loads in simulations of electro-mechanical transients,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 233–240, Mar. 2012. [75] D. Dotta, J. H. Chow, and D. B. Bertagnolli, ‘‘A teaching tool for phasor measurement estimation,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1981–1988, Jul. 2014. [76] A. Carta, N. Locci, C. Muscas, and S. Sulis, ‘‘A flexible GPS-based system for synchronized phasor measurement in electric distribution networks,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 57, no. 11, pp. 2450–2456, Nov. 2008. [77] A. Carta, N. Locci, and C. Muscas, ‘‘GPS-based system for the measurement of synchronized harmonic phasors,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 586–593, Mar. 2009. [78] R. Malpani, Z. Abbas, and K. S. Swarup, ‘‘High precision frequency estimation using internet-based phasor measurement unit,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 607–614, May 2010. [79] I. Kamwa, S. R. Samantaray, and G. Joós, ‘‘On the accuracy versus transparency trade-off of data-mining models for fast-response PMU-based catastrophe predictors,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 152–161, Mar. 2012. [80] G. V. de Andrade, S. R. Naidu, M. Neri, and E. G. da Costa, ‘‘Estimation of the utility’s and consumer’s contribution to harmonic distortion,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 58, no. 11, pp. 3817–3823, Nov. 2009. [81] A. Carta, N. Locci, and C. Muscas, ‘‘A PMU for the measurement of synchronized harmonic phasors in three-phase distribution networks,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 58, no. 10, pp. 3723–3730, Oct. 2009. [82] M. A. Donolo, V. A. Centeno, and Y. Liu, ‘‘Improving frequency measurements: Switching loads,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1803–1808, Oct. 2006. [83] M. A. Platas-Garza and J. A. de la O Serna, ‘‘Dynamic harmonic analysis through Taylor–Fourier transform,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 804–813, Mar. 2011. [84] M. Chakir, I. Kamwa, and H. Le Huy, ‘‘Extended C37.118.1 PMU algorithms for joint tracking of fundamental and harmonic phasors in stressed power systems and microgrids,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 1465–1480, Jun. 2004. [85] M. Bertocco, G. Frigo, C. Narduzzi, and F. Tramarin, ‘‘Resolution enhancement by compressive sensing in power quality and phasor measurement,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 63, no. 10, pp. 2358–2367, Oct. 2014. [86] IEEE Standard for Synchrophasers for Power Systems, IEEE Standard 1344–1995(R2001), Mar. 2001. [87] IEEE Standard for Synchrophasor Measurements for Power Systems, IEEE Standard C37.118.1–2011, Dec. 2011. [88] IEEE Standard for Synchrophasor Data Transfer for Power Systems, IEEE Standard C37.118.2–2011, Dec. 2011. [89] IEEE Standard for Synchrophasors for Power Systems, IEEE Standard C37.118–2005, Jun. 2005. [90] K. E. Martin et al., ‘‘IEEE standard for synchrophasors for power systems,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 73–77, Jan. 1998. [91] K. E. Martin et al., ‘‘Exploring the IEEE standard C37.118-2005 synchrophasors for power systems,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1805–1811, Oct. 2008. [92] M. A. Donolo and V. A. Centeno, ‘‘Accuracy limits for synchrophasor measurements and the IEEE standard,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 504–505, Jan. 2008. [93] K. E. Martin et al., ‘‘An overview of the IEEE standard C37.118.2— Synchrophasor data transfer for power systems,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1980–1984, Jul. 2014. [94] A. G. Phadke and B. Kasztenny, ‘‘Synchronized phasor and frequency measurement under transient conditions,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 89–95, Jan. 2009. VOLUME 2, 2014

[95] M. A. Donolo and V. A. Centeno, ‘‘A fast quality assessment algorithm for phasor measurements,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 2407–2413, Oct. 2005. [96] D. Macii, D. Petri, and A. Zorat, ‘‘Accuracy analysis and enhancement of DFT-based synchrophasor estimators in off-nominal conditions,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 61, no. 10, pp. 2653–2664, Oct. 2012. [97] P. Castello, M. Lixia, C. Muscas, and P. A. Pegoraro, ‘‘Impact of the model on the accuracy of synchrophasor measurement,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 61, no. 8, pp. 2179–2188, Aug. 2012. [98] D. Belega and D. Petri, ‘‘Accuracy analysis of the multicycle synchrophasor estimator provided by the interpolated DFT algorithm,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 942–953, May 2013. [99] A. J. Roscoe, ‘‘Exploring the relative performance of frequency-tracking and fixed-filter phasor measurement unit algorithms under C37.118 test procedures, the effects of interharmonics, and initial attempts at merging P-class response with M-class filtering,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 62, no. 8, pp. 2140–2153, Aug. 2013. [100] G. Barchi, D. Macii, D. Belega, and D. Petri, ‘‘Performance of synchrophasor estimators in transient conditions: A comparative analysis,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 2410–2418, Sep. 2013. [101] U. Pogliano, J. Braun, B. Voljc, and R. Lapuh, ‘‘Software platform for PMU algorithm testing,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 1400–1406, Jun. 2013. [102] G. Barchi, D. Macii, and D. Petri, ‘‘Synchrophasor estimators accuracy: A comparative analysis,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 963–973, May 2013. [103] H. Liu, T. Bi, and Q. Yang, ‘‘The evaluation of phasor measurement units and their dynamic behavior analysis,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 1479–1485, Jun. 2013. [104] D. Belega, D. Macii, and D. Petri, ‘‘Fast synchrophasor estimation by means of frequency-domain and time-domain algorithms,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 388–401, Feb. 2014. [105] D. R. Gurusinghe, A. D. Rajapakse, and K. Narendra, ‘‘Testing and enhancement of the dynamic performance of a phasor measurement unit,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1551–1560, Aug. 2004. [106] S. Das and T. Sidhu, ‘‘Detecting synchrophasors computed over fault/switching transients,’’ IET Generat., Transmiss. Distrib., vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 1616–1625, Sep. 2014. [107] I. Kamwa, S. R. Samantaray, and G. Joos, ‘‘Compliance analysis of PMU algorithms and devices for wide-area stabilizing control of large power systems,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 1766–1778, May 2013. [108] Q. Zhang, V. Vittal, G. T. Heydt, N. Logic, and S. Sturgill, ‘‘The integrated calibration of synchronized phasor measurement data in power transmission systems,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 2573–2581, Oct. 2011. [109] Y.-H. Tang, G. N. Stenbakken, and A. Goldstein, ‘‘Calibration of phasor measurement unit at NIST,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 1417–1422, Jun. 2013. [110] R. E. Wilson and P. S. Sterlina, ‘‘Verification of measured transmission system phase angles,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1743–1747, Oct. 1996. [111] R. E. Wilson, ‘‘PMUs [phasor measurement unit],’’ IEEE Potentials, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 26–28, Apr. 1994. [112] IEEE Guide for Synchronization, Calibration, Testing, and Installation of Phasor Measurement Units (PMUs) for Power System Protection and Control, IEEE Standard C37.242–2013, Mar. 2013. [113] IEEE Guide for Phasor Data Concentrator Requirements for Power System Protection, Control, and Monitoring, IEEE Standard C37.244–2013., Mar. 2013. [114] P. Castello, P. Ferrari, A. Flammini, C. Muscas, and S. Rinaldi, ‘‘A new IED with PMU functionalities for electrical substations,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 3209–3217, Dec. 2013. [115] T. Atalik et al., ‘‘Multipurpose platform for power system monitoring and analysis with sample grid applications,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 566–582, Mar. 2014. [116] D. M. Laverty, R. J. Best, P. Brogan, I. Al Khatib, L. Vanfretti, and D. J. Morrow, ‘‘The OpenPMU platform for open-source phasor measurements,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 701–709, Apr. 2013. [117] F. Aminifar, S. Bagheri-Shouraki, M. Fotuhi-Firuzabad, and M. Shahidehpour, ‘‘Reliability modeling of PMUs using fuzzy sets,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 2384–2391, Oct. 2010. 1619

F. Aminifar et al.: SMT in Power Systems

[118] Y. Wang, W. Li, P. Zhang, B. Wang, and J. Lu, ‘‘Reliability analysis of phasor measurement unit considering data uncertainty,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 1503–1510, Aug. 2012. [119] P. Zhang and K. W. Chan, ‘‘Reliability evaluation of phasor measurement unit using Monte Carlo dynamic fault tree method,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1235–1243, Sep. 2012. [120] R. J. Albuquerque and V. L. Paucar, ‘‘Evaluation of the PMUs measurement channels availability for observability analysis,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 2536–2544, Aug. 2013. [121] C. Murthy, A. Mishra, D. Ghosh, D. S. Roy, and D. K. Mohanta, ‘‘Reliability analysis of phasor measurement unit using hidden Markov model,’’ IEEE Syst. J., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1293–1301, Dec. 2014. [122] C. Murthy, K. A. Varma, D. S. Roy, and D. K. Mohanta, ‘‘Reliability evaluation of phasor measurement unit using type-2 fuzzy set theory,’’ IEEE Syst. J., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1302–1309, Dec. 2014. [123] X. Jiang, J. Zhang, B. J. Harding, J. J. Makela, and A. D. Dominguez-Garcia, ‘‘Spoofing GPS receiver clock offset of phasor measurement units,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 3253–3262, Aug. 2013. [124] Z. Zhang, S. Gong, A. D. Dimitrovski, and H. Li, ‘‘Time synchronization attack in smart grid: Impact and analysis,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 87–98, Mar. 2013. [125] C. Bonebrake and L. R. O’Neil, ‘‘Attacks on GPS time reliability,’’ IEEE Security Privacy, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 82–84, May/Jun. 2014. [126] F. Aminifar, M. Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M. Shahidehpour, and A. Safdarian, ‘‘Impact of WAMS malfunction on power system reliability assessment,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1302–1309, Sep. 2012. [127] P. Kansal and A. Bose, ‘‘Bandwidth and latency requirements for smart transmission grid applications,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1344–1352, Sep. 2012. [128] D. Anderson, C. Zhao, C. H. Hauser, V. Venkatasubramanian, D. E. Bakken, and A. Bose, ‘‘Intelligent design’ real-time simulation for smart grid control and communications design,’’ IEEE Power Energy Mag., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 49–57, Jan./Feb. 2012. [129] D. Ghosh, T. Ghose, and D. K. Mohanta, ‘‘Communication feasibility analysis for smart grid with phasor measurement units,’’ IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1486–1496, Aug. 2013. [130] S. Das and T. Singh Sidhu, ‘‘Application of compressive sampling in synchrophasor data communication in WAMS,’’ IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 450–460, Feb. 2014. [131] A. G. Phadke et al., ‘‘Synchronized sampling and phasor measurements for relaying and control,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 442–452, Jan. 1994. [132] A. G. Phadke, ‘‘Synchronized phasor measurements in power systems,’’ IEEE Comput. Appl. Power, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 10–15, Apr. 1993. [133] B. J. Cory and P. F. Gale, ‘‘Satellites for power system applications,’’ Power Eng. J., vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 201–207, Oct. 1993. [134] T. W. Cease and B. Feldhaus, ‘‘Real-time monitoring of the TVA power system,’’ IEEE Comput. Appl. Power, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 47–51, Jul. 1994. [135] B. Fardanesh, S. Zelingher, A. P. S. Meliopoulos, G. J. Cokkinides, and J. Ingleson, ‘‘Multifunctional synchronized measurement network [power systems],’’ IEEE Comput. Appl. Power, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 26–30, Jan. 1998. [136] R. O. Burnett, Jr., M. M. Butts, and P. S. Sterlina, ‘‘Power system applications for phasor measurement units,’’ IEEE Comput. Appl. Power, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 8–13, Jan. 1994. [137] A. Gomez-Exposito and A. Abur, ‘‘Foreword for the special section on synchrophasor applications in power systems,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 1907–1909, May 2013. [138] C. Dufour and J. Belanger, ‘‘On the use of real-time simulation technology in smart grid research and development,’’ IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 3963–3970, Nov./Dec. 2014. [139] G. T. Heydt, C. C. Liu, A. G. Phadke, and V. Vittal, ‘‘Solution for the crisis in electric power supply,’’ IEEE Comput. Appl. Power, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 22–30, Jul. 2001. [140] D. Novosel, M. M. Begovic, and V. Madani, ‘‘Shedding light on blackouts,’’ IEEE Power Energy Mag., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 32–43, Jan./Feb. 2004. [141] D. Karlsson, M. Hemmingsson, and S. Lindahl, ‘‘Wide area system monitoring and control—Terminology, phenomena, and solution implementation strategies,’’ IEEE Power Energy Mag., vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 68–76, Sep./Oct. 2004. [142] M. Zima, M. Larsson, P. Korba, C. Rehtanz, and G. Andersson, ‘‘Design aspects for wide-area monitoring and control systems,’’ Proc. IEEE, vol. 93, no. 5, pp. 980–996, May 2005. 1620

[143] J. Thorp, A. Abur, M. Begovic, J. Giri, and R. Avila-Rosales, ‘‘Gaining a wider perspective,’’ IEEE Power Energy Mag., vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 43–51, Sep./Oct. 2008. [144] Y. W. Law, M. Palaniswami, G. Kounga, and A. Lo, ‘‘WAKE: Key management scheme for wide-area measurement systems in smart grid,’’ IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 34–41, Jan. 2013. [145] D. Novosel, V. Madani, B. Bhargava, K. Vu, and J. Cole, ‘‘Dawn of the grid synchronization,’’ IEEE Power Energy Mag., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 49–60, Jan./Feb. 2008. [146] A. G. Phadke and R. M. de Moraes, ‘‘The wide world of wide-area measurement,’’ IEEE Power Energy Mag., vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 52–65, Sep./Oct. 2008. [147] J. Giri, D. Sun, and R. Avila-Rosales, ‘‘Wanted: A more intelligent grid,’’ IEEE Power Energy Mag., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 34–40, Mar./Apr. 2009. [148] R. B. Bobba et al., ‘‘Enhancing grid measurements: Wide area measurement systems, NASPInet, and security,’’ IEEE Power Energy Mag., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 67–73, Jan./Feb. 2012. [149] E. Litvinov, X. Luo, M. Lelic, Y. Hu, B. Avramovic, and D. Novosel, ‘‘Developing technology road maps: A case study for synchophasor deployment,’’ IEEE Power Energy Mag., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 97–106, Mar./Apr. 2014. [150] X. Xie, Y. Xin, J. Xiao, J. Wu, and Y. Han, ‘‘WAMS applications in Chinese power systems,’’ IEEE Power Energy Mag., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 54–63, Jan./Feb. 2006. [151] J. Kim et al., ‘‘Study of the effectiveness of a Korean smart transmission grid based on synchro-phasor data of K-WAMS,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 411–418, Mar. 2013. [152] D. Atanakovic, J. H. Clapauch, G. Dwernychuk, J. Gurney, and H. Lee, ‘‘First steps to wide area control,’’ IEEE Power Energy Mag., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 61–68, Jan./Feb. 2008. [153] K. E. Martin and J. R. Carroll, ‘‘Phasing in the technology,’’ IEEE Power Energy Mag., vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 24–33, Sep./Oct. 2008. [154] J. De La Ree, V. Centeno, J. S. Thorp, and A. G. Phadke, ‘‘Synchronized phasor measurement applications in power systems,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 20–27, Jun. 2010. [155] V. Terzija et al., ‘‘Wide-area monitoring, protection, and control of future electric power networks,’’ Proc. IEEE, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 80–93, Jan. 2011. [156] J. Giri, M. Parashar, J. Trehern, and V. Madani, ‘‘The situation room: Control center analytics for enhanced situational awareness,’’ IEEE Power Energy Mag., vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 24–39, Sep./Oct. 2010. [157] A. Bose, ‘‘Smart transmission grid applications and their supporting infrastructure,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 11–19, Jun. 2010. [158] S. Horowitz, A. G. Phadke, and B. Renz, ‘‘The future of power transmission,’’ IEEE Power Energy Mag., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 34–40, Mar./Apr. 2010. [159] A. Armenia and J. H. Chow, ‘‘A flexible phasor data concentrator design leveraging existing software technologies,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 73–81, Jun. 2010. [160] Y.-J. Kim, M. Thottan, V. Kolesnikov, and W. Lee, ‘‘A secure decentralized data-centric information infrastructure for smart grid,’’ IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 48, no. 11, pp. 58–65, Nov. 2010. [161] C.-L. Chuang, Y.-C. Wang, C.-H. Lee, M.-Y. Liu, Y.-T. Hsiao, and J.-A. Jiang, ‘‘An adaptive routing algorithm over packet switching networks for operation monitoring of power transmission systems,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 882–890, Apr. 2010. [162] M. D. Ilić, L. Xie, U. A. Khan, and J. M. F. Moura, ‘‘Modeling of future cyber–physical energy systems for distributed sensing and control,’’ IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. A, Syst., Humans, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 825–838, Jul. 2010. [163] B. Sikdar and J. H. Chow, ‘‘Defending synchrophasor data networks against traffic analysis attacks,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 819–826, Dec. 2011. [164] T. T. Kim and H. V. Poor, ‘‘Strategic protection against data injection attacks on power grids,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 326–333, Jun. 2011. [165] M. Chenine and L. Nordström, ‘‘Modeling and simulation of wide-area communication for centralized PMU-based applications,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1372–1380, Jul. 2011. [166] K. Zhu, M. Chenine, and L. Nordström, ‘‘ICT architecture impact on wide area monitoring and control systems’ reliability,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 2801–2808, Oct. 2011. VOLUME 2, 2014

F. Aminifar et al.: SMT in Power Systems

[167] M. Qiu, H. Su, M. Chen, Z. Ming, and L. T. Yang, ‘‘Balance of security strength and energy for a PMU monitoring system in smart grid,’’ IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 142–149, May 2012. [168] S. Cui, Z. Han, S. Kar, T. T. Kim, H. V. Poor, and A. Tajer, ‘‘Coordinated data-injection attack and detection in the smart grid: A detailed look at enriching detection solutions,’’ IEEE Signal Process. Mag., vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 106–115, Sep. 2012. [169] C.-H. Lo and N. Ansari, ‘‘The progressive smart grid system from both power and communications aspects,’’ IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 799–821, third quarter 2012. [170] D.-H. Shin, S. He, and J. Zhang, ‘‘Robust, secure, and cost-effective design for cyber-physical systems,’’ IEEE Intell. Syst., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 66–69, Jan./Feb. 2014. [171] Z. Zhong et al., ‘‘Power system frequency monitoring network (FNET) implementation,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 1914–1921, Nov. 2005. [172] Y. Zhang et al., ‘‘Wide-area frequency monitoring network (FNET) architecture and applications,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 159–167, Sep. 2010. [173] T. L. Baldwin, L. Mili, M. B. Boisen, Jr., and R. Adapa, ‘‘Power system observability with minimal phasor measurement placement,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 707–715, May 1993. [174] D. Dua, S. Dambhare, R. K. Gajbhiye, and S. A. Soman, ‘‘Optimal multistage scheduling of PMU placement: An ILP approach,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1812–1820, Oct. 2008. [175] F. J. Marin, F. Garcia-Lagos, G. Joya, and F. Sandoval, ‘‘Genetic algorithms for optimal placement of phasor measurement units in electrical networks,’’ Electron. Lett., vol. 39, no. 19, pp. 1403–1405, Sep. 2003. [176] N. M. Manousakis, G. N. Korres, and P. S. Georgilakis, ‘‘Taxonomy of PMU placement methodologies,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 1070–1077, May 2012. [177] M. Shahraeini, M. S. Ghazizadeh, and M. H. Javidi, ‘‘Co-optimal placement of measurement devices and their related communication infrastructure in wide area measurement systems,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 684–691, Jun. 2012. [178] F. Aminifar, C. Lucas, A. Khodaei, and M. Fotuhi-Firuzabad, ‘‘Optimal placement of phasor measurement units using immunity genetic algorithm,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1014–1020, Jul. 2009. [179] B. Gou, ‘‘Optimal placement of PMUs by integer linear programming,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1525–1526, Aug. 2008. [180] R. Kavasseri and S. K. Sirnivasan, ‘‘Joint placement of phasor and power flow measurements for observability of power systems,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 1929–1936, Nov. 2011. [181] R. Kavasseri and S. K. Srinivasan, ‘‘Joint placement of phasor and conventional power flow measurements for fault observability of power systems,’’ IET Generat., Transmiss. Distrib., vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 1019–1024, Oct. 2011. [182] N. M. Manousakis and G. N. Korres, ‘‘A weighted least squares algorithm for optimal PMU placement,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 3499–3500, Aug. 2013. [183] N. C. Koutsoukis, N. M. Manousakis, P. S. Georgilakis, and G. N. Korres, ‘‘Numerical observability method for optimal phasor measurement units placement using recursive Tabu search method,’’ IET Generat., Transmiss. Distrib., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 347–356, Apr. 2013. [184] S. Chakrabarti, E. Kyriakides, and D. G. Eliades, ‘‘Placement of synchronized measurements for power system observability,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 12–19, Jan. 2009. [185] B. Milosevic and M. Begovic, ‘‘Nondominated sorting genetic algorithm for optimal phasor measurement placement,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 69–75, Feb. 2003. [186] S. M. Mazhari, H. Monsef, H. Lesani, and A. Fereidunian, ‘‘A multiobjective PMU placement method considering measurement redundancy and observability value under contingencies,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 2136–2146, Aug. 2013. [187] M. Esmaili, K. Gharani, and H. A. Shayanfar, ‘‘Redundant observability PMU placement in the presence of flow measurements considering contingencies,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 3765–3773, Nov. 2013. [188] F. Aminifar, A. Khodaei, M. Fotuhi-Firuzabad, and M. Shahidehpour, ‘‘Contingency-constrained PMU placement in power networks,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 516–523, Feb. 2010. [189] S. Chakrabarti and E. Kyriakides, ‘‘Optimal placement of phasor measurement units for power system observability,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1433–1440, Aug. 2008. VOLUME 2, 2014

[190] N. H. Abbasy and H. M. Ismail, ‘‘A unified approach for the optimal PMU location for power system state estimation,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 806–813, May 2009. [191] R. Emami and A. Abur, ‘‘Robust measurement design by placing synchronized phasor measurements on network branches,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 38–43, Feb. 2010. [192] C. Rakpenthai, S. Premrudeepreechacharn, S. Uatrongjit, and N. R. Watson, ‘‘An optimal PMU placement method against measurement loss and branch outage,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 101–107, Jan. 2007. [193] S. Azizi, A. S. Dobakhshari, S. A. Nezam Sarmadi, and A. M. Ranjbar, ‘‘Optimal PMU placement by an equivalent linear formulation for exhaustive search,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 174–182, Mar. 2012. [194] S. Azizi, G. B. Gharehpetian, and A. S. Dobakhshari, ‘‘Optimal integration of phasor measurement units in power systems considering conventional measurements,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1113–1121, Jun. 2013. [195] K. G. Firouzjah, A. Sheikholeslami, and T. Barforoushi, ‘‘Reliability improvement of power system observability with minimum phasor measurement units,’’ IET Generat., Transmiss. Distrib., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 118–129, Feb. 2013. [196] L. Huang, Y. Sun, J. Xu, W. Gao, J. Zhang, and Z. Wu, ‘‘Optimal PMU placement considering controlled islanding of power system,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 742–755, Mar. 2014. [197] K.-P. Lein, C.-W. Liu, C.-S. Yu, and J.-A. Jiang, ‘‘Transmission network fault location observability with minimal PMU placement,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1128–1136, Jul. 2006. [198] J. Chen and A. Abur, ‘‘Placement of PMUs to enable bad data detection in state estimation,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1608–1615, Nov. 2006. [199] B. Gou and R. G. Kavasseri, ‘‘Unified PMU placement for observability and bad data detection in state estimation,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 2573–2580, Nov. 2014. [200] L. Zhang and A. Abur, ‘‘Strategic placement of phasor measurements for parameter error identification,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 393–400, Feb. 2013. [201] W. Jiang, V. Vittal, and G. T. Heydt, ‘‘A distributed state estimator utilizing synchronized phasor measurements,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 563–571, May 2007. [202] J. Chen and A. Abur, ‘‘Enhanced topology error processing via optimal measurement design,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 845–852, Aug. 2008. [203] A. Chakrabortty and C. F. Martin, ‘‘Optimal measurement allocation algorithms for parametric model identification of power systems,’’ IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1801–1802, Sep. 2014. [204] V. Kekatos, G. B. Giannakis, and B. Wollenberg, ‘‘Optimal placement of phasor measurement units via convex relaxation,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 1521–1530, Aug. 2012. [205] E. Caro, R. Singh, B. C. Pal, A. J. Conejo, and R. A. Jabr, ‘‘Participation factor approach for phasor measurement unit placement in power system state estimation,’’ IET Generat., Transmiss. Distrib., vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 922–929, Sep. 2012. [206] Q. Li, T. Cui, Y. Weng, R. Negi, F. Franchetti, and M. D. Ilic, ‘‘An information-theoretic approach to PMU placement in electric power systems,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 446–456, Mar. 2013. [207] X. Li, A. Scaglione, and T.-H. Chang, ‘‘A framework for phasor measurement placement in hybrid state estimation via Gauss–Newton,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 824–832, Mar. 2014. [208] L. Zhang and A. Abur, ‘‘Single and double edge cutset identification in large scale power networks,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 510–516, Feb. 2012. [209] J. Huang, N. E. Wu, and M. C. Ruschmann, ‘‘Data-availabilityconstrained placement of PMUs and communication links in a power system,’’ IEEE Syst. J., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 483–492, Jun. 2014. [210] F. H. Fesharaki, R.-A. Hooshmand, and A. Khodabakhshian, ‘‘Simultaneous optimal design of measurement and communication infrastructures in hierarchical structured WAMS,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 312–319, Jan. 2014. [211] J. Liu, F. Ponci, A. Monti, C. Muscas, P. A. Pegoraro, and S. Sulis, ‘‘Optimal meter placement for robust measurement systems in active distribution grids,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 1096–1105, May 2014. 1621

F. Aminifar et al.: SMT in Power Systems

[212] R. F. Nuqui and A. G. Phadke, ‘‘Phasor measurement unit placement techniques for complete and incomplete observability,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 2381–2388, Oct. 2005. [213] B. Gou, ‘‘Generalized integer linear programming formulation for optimal PMU placement,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1099–1104, Aug. 2008. [214] R. Sodhi, S. C. Srivastava, and S. N. Singh, ‘‘Multi-criteria decisionmaking approach for multistage optimal placement of phasor measurement units,’’ IET Generat., Transmiss. Distrib., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 181–190, Feb. 2011. [215] M. H. F. Wen, J. Xu, and V. O. K. Li, ‘‘Optimal multistage PMU placement for wide-area monitoring,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 4134–4143, Nov. 2013. [216] A. Pal, G. A. Sanchez-Ayala, V. A. Centeno, and J. S. Thorp, ‘‘A PMU placement scheme ensuring real-time monitoring of critical buses of the network,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 510–517, Apr. 2014. [217] F. Aminifar, M. Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M. Shahidehpour, and A. Khodaei, ‘‘Probabilistic multistage PMU placement in electric power systems,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 841–849, Apr. 2011. [218] Y. Wang, C. Wang, W. Li, J. Li, and F. Lin, ‘‘Reliability-based incremental PMU placement,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 2744–2752, Nov. 2014. [219] O. Gomez, M. A. Rios, and G. Anders, ‘‘Reliability-based phasor measurement unit placement in power systems considering transmission line outages and channel limits,’’ IET Generat., Transmiss. Distrib., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 121–130, Jan. 2014. [220] F. Aminifar, M. Fotuhi-Firuzabad, and A. Safdarian, ‘‘Optimal PMU placement based on probabilistic cost/benefit analysis,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 566–567, Feb. 2013. [221] I. Kamwa and R. Grondin, ‘‘PMU configuration for system dynamic performance measurement in large, multiarea power systems,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 385–394, May 2002. [222] I. Kamwa, A. K. Pradhan, and G. Joos, ‘‘Automatic segmentation of large power systems into fuzzy coherent areas for dynamic vulnerability assessment,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1974–1985, Nov. 2007. [223] I. Kamwa, A. K. Pradhan, G. Joos, and S. R. Samantaray, ‘‘Fuzzy partitioning of a real power system for dynamic vulnerability assessment,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1356–1365, Aug. 2009. [224] M. Dehghani, B. Shayanfar, and A. R. Khayatian, ‘‘PMU ranking based on singular value decomposition of dynamic stability matrix,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 2263–2270, Aug. 2013. [225] F. Aminifar, M. Fotuhi-Firuzabad, A. Safdarian, and M. Shahidehpour, ‘‘Observability of hybrid AC/DC power systems with variable-cost PMUs,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 345–352, Feb. 2014. [226] J. S. Thorp, A. G. Phadke, and K. J. Karimi, ‘‘Real time voltage-phasor measurement for static state estimation,’’ IEEE Trans. Power App. Syst., vol. PAS-104, no. 11, pp. 3098–3106, Nov. 1985. [227] A. G. Phadke, J. S. Thorp, and K. J. Karimi, ‘‘State estimation with phasor measurements,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 233–238, Feb. 1986. [228] S. Chakrabarti, E. Kyriakides, G. Ledwich, and A. Ghosh, ‘‘Inclusion of PMU current phasor measurements in a power system state estimator,’’ IET Generat., Transmiss. Distrib., vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 1104–1115, Oct. 2010. [229] A. Gómez-Expósito, A. Abur, A. de la Villa Jaén, and C. Gómez-Quiles, ‘‘A multilevel state estimation paradigm for smart grids,’’ Proc. IEEE, vol. 99, no. 6, pp. 952–976, Jun. 2011. [230] T. Yang, H. Sun, and A. Bose, ‘‘Transition to a two-level linear state estimator—Part I: Architecture,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 46–53, Feb. 2011. [231] T. Yang, H. Sun, and A. Bose, ‘‘Transition to a two-level linear state estimator—Part II: Algorithm,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 54–62, Feb. 2011. [232] G. Valverde, S. Chakrabarti, E. Kyriakides, and V. Terzija, ‘‘A constrained formulation for hybrid state estimation,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1102–1109, Aug. 2011. [233] M. Göl, A. Abur, and F. Galvan, ‘‘Metrics for success: Performance metrics for power system state estimators and measurement designs,’’ IEEE Power Energy Mag., vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 50–57, Sep./Oct. 2012. 1622

[234] G. N. Korres and T. A. Alexopoulos, ‘‘A constrained ordering for solving the equality constrained state estimation,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1998–2005, Nov. 2012. [235] M. Gol and A. Abur, ‘‘A robust PMU based three-phase state estimator using modal decoupling,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 2292–2299, Sep. 2014. [236] J. Zhang, G. Welch, G. Bishop, and Z. Huang, ‘‘A two-stage Kalman filter approach for robust and real-time power system state estimation,’’ IEEE Trans. Sustainable Energy, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 629–636, Apr. 2014. [237] Y. Chakhchoukh, V. Vittal, and G. T. Heydt, ‘‘PMU based state estimation by integrating correlation,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 617–626, Mar. 2014. [238] F. Aminifar, M. Shahidehpour, M. Fotuhi-Firuzabad, and S. Kamalinia, ‘‘Power system dynamic state estimation with synchronized phasor measurements,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 352–363, Feb. 2014. [239] M. Gol and A. Abur, ‘‘LAV based robust state estimation for systems measured by PMUs,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1808–1815, Jul. 2014. [240] H. Zhu and G. B. Giannakis, ‘‘Power system nonlinear state estimation using distributed semidefinite programming,’’ IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 1039–1050, Dec. 2014. [241] S. G. Ghiocel et al., ‘‘Phasor-measurement-based state estimation for synchrophasor data quality improvement and power transfer interface monitoring,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 881–888, Mar. 2014. [242] N. Kashyap, S. Werner, Y.-F. Huang, and T. Riihonen, ‘‘Power system state estimation under incomplete PMU observability—A reducedorder approach,’’ IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 1051–1062, Dec. 2014. [243] M. Gol and A. Abur, ‘‘Observability and criticality analyses for power systems measured by phasor measurements,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 3319–3326, Aug. 2013. [244] M. Brown Do Coutto Filho, J. C. Stacchini de Souza, and M. A. Ribeiro Guimaraens, ‘‘Enhanced bad data processing by phasoraided state estimation,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 2200–2209, Sep. 2014. [245] S. Chakrabatri and E. Kyriakides, ‘‘PMU measurement uncertainty considerations in WLS state estimation,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 1062–1071, May 2009. [246] P. M. Ashton, G. A. Taylor, M. R. Irving, I. Pisica, A. M. Carter, and M. E. Bradley, ‘‘Novel application of detrended fluctuation analysis for state estimation using synchrophasor measurements,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 1930–1938, May 2013. [247] Q. Zhang, Y. Chakhchoukh, V. Vittal, G. T. Heydt, N. Logic, and S. Sturgill, ‘‘Impact of PMU measurement buffer length on state estimation and its optimization,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 1657–1665, May 2013. [248] J. B. A. London, S. A. R. Piereti, R. A. S. Benedito, and N. G. Bretas, ‘‘Redundancy and observability analysis of conventional and PMU measurements,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1629–1630, Aug. 2009. [249] L. Vanfretti, J. H. Chow, S. Sarawgi, and B. Fardanesh, ‘‘A phasor-databased state estimator incorporating phase bias correction,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 111–119, Feb. 2011. [250] P. Yang, Z. Tan, A. Wiesel, and A. Nehorai, ‘‘Power system state estimation using PMUs with imperfect synchronization,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 4162–4172, Nov. 2013. [251] M. Zhou, V. A. Centeno, J. S. Thorp, and A. G. Phadke, ‘‘An alternative for including phasor measurements in state estimators,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1930–1937, Nov. 2006. [252] A. Simões Costa, A. Albuquerque, and D. Bez, ‘‘An estimation fusion method for including phasor measurements into power system real-time modeling,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 1910–1920, May 2013. [253] M. Glavic and T. Van Cutsem, ‘‘Reconstructing and tracking network state from a limited number of synchrophasor measurements,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 1921–1929, May 2013. [254] L. Zhao and A. Abur, ‘‘Multi area state estimation using synchronized phasor measurements,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 611–617, May 2005. [255] W. Jiang, V. Vittal, and G. T. Heydt, ‘‘Diakoptic state estimation using phasor measurement units,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1580–1589, Nov. 2008. VOLUME 2, 2014

F. Aminifar et al.: SMT in Power Systems

[256] A. K. Singh and B. C. Pal, ‘‘Decentralized dynamic state estimation in power systems using unscented transformation,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 794–804, Mar. 2014. [257] J. Du, S. Ma, Y.-C. Wu, and H. Vincent Poor, ‘‘Distributed hybrid power state estimation under PMU sampling phase errors,’’ IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 62, no. 16, pp. 4052–4063, Aug. 2014. [258] M. J. Rice and G. T. Heydt, ‘‘The measurement outage table and state estimation,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 353–360, May 2008. [259] S. Chakrabarti, E. Kyriakides, and M. Albu, ‘‘Uncertainty in power system state variables obtained through synchronized measurements,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 2452–2458, Aug. 2009. [260] J. E. Tate and T. J. Overbye, ‘‘Line outage detection using phasor angle measurements,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1644–1652, Nov. 2008. [261] Y. Zhao, J. Chen, A. Goldsmith, and H. Vincent Poor, ‘‘Identification of outages in power systems with uncertain states and optimal sensor locations,’’ IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 1140–1153, Dec. 2014. [262] C. Rakpenthai, S. Uatrongjit, and S. Premrudeepreechacharn, ‘‘State estimation of power system considering network parameter uncertainty based on parametric interval linear systems,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 305–313, Feb. 2012. [263] G. N. Korres and N. M. Manousakis, ‘‘State estimation and observability analysis for phasor measurement unit measured systems,’’ IET Generat., Transmiss. Distrib., vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 902–913, 2012. [264] M. Lixia, A. Benigni, A. Flammini, C. Muscas, F. Ponci, and A. Monti, ‘‘A software-only PTP synchronization for power system state estimation with PMUs,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 1476–1485, May 2012. [265] D. A. Haughton and G. T. Heydt, ‘‘A linear state estimation formulation for smart distribution systems,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 1187–1195, May 2013. [266] M. Pau, P. A. Pegoraro, and S. Sulis, ‘‘Efficient branch-current-based distribution system state estimation including synchronized measurements,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 2419–2429, Sep. 2013. [267] C. Muscas, S. Sulis, A. Angioni, F. Ponci, and A. Monti, ‘‘Impact of different uncertainty sources on a three-phase state estimator for distribution networks,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 63, no. 9, pp. 2200–2209, Sep. 2014. [268] C. Muscas, M. Pau, P. A. Pegoraro, and S. Sulis, ‘‘Effects of measurements and pseudomeasurements correlation in distribution system state estimation,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 63, no. 12, pp. 2813–2823, Dec. 2014. [269] C. Rakpenthai, S. Uatrongjit, N. R. Watson, and S. Premrudeechacharn, ‘‘On harmonic state estimation of power system with uncertain network parameters,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 4829–4838, Nov. 2013. [270] D. N. Kosterev, ‘‘Hydro turbine-governor model validation in pacific northwest,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 1144–1149, May 2004. [271] Z. Huang, P. Du, D. Kosterev, and S. Yang, ‘‘Generator dynamic model validation and parameter calibration using phasor measurements at the point of connection,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 1939–1949, May 2013. [272] L. Fan, Z. Miao, and Y. Wehbe, ‘‘Application of dynamic state and parameter estimation techniques on real-world data,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1133–1141, Jun. 2013. [273] N. Zhou, D. Meng, and S. Lu, ‘‘Estimation of the dynamic states of synchronous machines using an extended particle filter,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 4152–4161, Nov. 2013. [274] P. Overholt, D. Kosterev, J. Eto, S. Yang, and B. Lesieutre, ‘‘Improving reliability through better models: Using synchrophasor data to validate power plant models,’’ IEEE Power Energy Mag., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 44–51, May/Jun. 2014. [275] J. Ma, D. Han, W.-J. Sheng, R.-M. He, C.-Y. You, and J. Zhang, ‘‘Wide area measurements-based model validation and its application,’’ IET Generat., Transmiss. Distrib., vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 906–916, Nov. 2008. [276] J. M. Kennedy, B. Fox, T. Littler, and D. Flynn, ‘‘Validation of fixed speed induction generator models for inertial response using wind farm measurements,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1454–1461, Aug. 2011. VOLUME 2, 2014

[277] Y. Zhang, J. Bank, E. Muljadi, Y.-H. Wan, and D. Corbus, ‘‘Angle instability detection in power systems with high-wind penetration using synchrophasor measurements,’’ IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Topics Power Electron., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 306–314, Dec. 2013. [278] J. Zhu and A. Abur, ‘‘Improvements in network parameter error identification via synchronized phasors,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 44–50, Feb. 2010. [279] G. Sivanagaraju, S. Chakrabarti, and S. C. Srivastava, ‘‘Uncertainty in transmission line parameters: Estimation and impact on line current differential protection,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 1496– 1504, Jun. 2014. [280] C.-S. Yu and C.-W. Liu, ‘‘Self-correction two-machine equivalent model for stability control of FACT system using real-time phasor measurements,’’ IET Proc.-Generat., Transmiss. Distrib., vol. 149, no. 4, pp. 389–396, Jul. 2002. [281] L. He and C.-C. Liu, ‘‘Parameter identification with PMUs for instability detection in power systems with HVDC integrated offshore wind energy,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 775–784, Mar. 2014. [282] J. H. Chow, A. Chakrabortty, L. Vanfretti, and M. Arcak, ‘‘Estimation of radial power system transfer path dynamic parameters using synchronized phasor data,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 564–571, May 2008. [283] A. Chakrabortty, J. H. Chow, and A. Salazar, ‘‘A measurement-based framework for dynamic equivalencing of large power systems using widearea phasor measurements,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 68– 81, Mar. 2011. [284] A. Vahidnia, G. Ledwich, E. Palmer, and A. Ghosh, ‘‘Identification and estimation of equivalent area parameters using synchronised phasor measurements,’’ IET Generat., Transmiss. Distrib., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 697–704, Apr. 2014. [285] A. Chakrabortty, J. H. Chow, and A. Salazar, ‘‘Interarea model estimation for radial power system transfer paths with intermediate voltage control using synchronized phasor measurements,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1318–1326, Aug. 2009. [286] J. Yang, W. Li, T. Chen, W. Xu, and M. Wu, ‘‘Online estimation and application of power grid impedance matrices based on synchronised phasor measurements,’’ IET Generat., Transmiss. Distrib., vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 1052–1059, Sep. 2010. [287] S. M. Abdelkader and D. J. Morrow, ‘‘Online tracking of Thévenin equivalent parameters using PMU measurements,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 975–983, May 2012. [288] K. Sun, S. T. Lee, and P. Zhang, ‘‘An adaptive power system equivalent for real-time estimation of stability margin using phase-plane trajectories,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 915–923, May 2011. [289] R. Eriksson and L. Söder, ‘‘Wide-area measurement system-based subspace identification for obtaining linear models to centrally coordinate controllable devices,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 988–997, Apr. 2011. [290] P. Du and Y. Makarov, ‘‘Using disturbance data to monitor primary frequency response for power system interconnections,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 1431–1432, May 2014. [291] I. Kamwa, S. R. Samantaray, and G. Joós, ‘‘On the accuracy versus transparency trade-off of data-mining models for fast-response PMUbased catastrophe predictors,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 152–161, Mar. 2012. [292] J.-A. Jiang, J.-Z. Yang, Y.-H. Lin, C.-W. Liu, and J.-C. Ma, ‘‘An adaptive PMU based fault detection/location technique for transmission lines. I. Theory and algorithms,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 486–493, Apr. 2000. [293] J.-A. Jiang, Y.-H. Lin, J.-Z. Yang, T.-M. Too, and C.-W. Liu, ‘‘An adaptive PMU based fault detection/location technique for transmission lines. II. PMU implementation and performance evaluation,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1136–1146, Oct. 2000. [294] Y.-H. Lin, C.-W. Liu, and C.-S. Chen, ‘‘A new PMU-based fault detection/location technique for transmission lines with consideration of arcing fault discrimination—Part I: Theory and algorithms,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1587–1593, Oct. 2004. [295] Y.-H. Lin, C.-W. Liu, and C.-S. Chen, ‘‘A new PMU-based fault detection/location technique for transmission lines with consideration of arcing fault discrimination—Part II: Performance evaluation,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1594–1601, Oct. 2004. 1623

F. Aminifar et al.: SMT in Power Systems

[296] J.-A. Jiang, C.-S. Chen, and C.-W. Liu, ‘‘A new protection scheme for fault detection, direction discrimination, classification, and location in transmission lines,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 34–42, Jan. 2003. [297] Y.-H. Lin, C.-W. Liu, and C.-S. Yu, ‘‘A new fault locator for three-terminal transmission lines using two-terminal synchronized voltage and current phasors,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 452–459, Apr. 2002. [298] C.-W. Liu, K.-P. Lien, C.-S. Chen, and J.-A. Jiang, ‘‘A universal fault location technique for N-terminal (N ≥ q3) transmission lines,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1366–1373, Jul. 2008. [299] S. M. Brahma, ‘‘New fault-location method for a single multiterminal transmission line using synchronized phasor measurements,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1148–1153, Jul. 2006. [300] J. Izykowski, E. Rosolowski, M. M. Saha, M. Fulczyk, and P. Balcerek, ‘‘A fault-location method for application with current differential relays of three-terminal lines,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 2099–2107, Oct. 2007. [301] G. Manassero, E. C. Senger, R. M. Nakagomi, E. L. Pollini, and E. C. N. Rodrigues, ‘‘Fault-location system for multiterminal transmission lines,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 1418–1426, Jul. 2010. [302] Z. Y. He et al., ‘‘Dynamic fault locator for three-terminal transmission lines for phasor measurement units,’’ IET Generat., Transmiss. Distrib., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 183–191, Feb. 2013. [303] T.-C. Lin, P.-Y. Lin, and C.-W. Liu, ‘‘An algorithm for locating faults in three-terminal multisection nonhomogeneous transmission lines using synchrophasor measurements,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 38–50, Jan. 2014. [304] Q. Jiang, B. Wang, and X. Li, ‘‘An efficient PMU-based fault-location technique for multiterminal transmission lines,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1675–1682, Aug. 2004. [305] A. Salehi-Dobakhshari and A. M. Ranjbar, ‘‘Application of synchronised phasor measurements to wide-area fault diagnosis and location,’’ IET Generat., Transmiss. Distrib., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 716–729, Apr. 2014. [306] M. He and J. Zhang, ‘‘A dependency graph approach for fault detection and localization towards secure smart grid,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 342–351, Jun. 2011. [307] Z. Y. He, R. K. Mai, W. He, and Q. Q. Qian, ‘‘Phasor-measurement-unitbased transmission line fault location estimator under dynamic conditions,’’ IET Generat., Transmiss. Distrib., vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 1183–1191, Nov. 2011. [308] C.-S. Chen, C.-W. Liu, and J.-A. Jiang, ‘‘A new adaptive PMU based protection scheme for transposed/untransposed parallel transmission lines,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 395–404, Apr. 2002. [309] N. Kang and Y. Liao, ‘‘Double-circuit transmission-line fault location utilizing synchronized current phasors,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 1040–1047, Apr. 2013. [310] C.-S. Yu, C.-W. Liu, S.-L. Yu, and J.-A. Jiang, ‘‘A new PMU-based fault location algorithm for series compensated lines,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 33–46, Jan. 2002. [311] A. H. Al-Mohammed and M. A. Abido, ‘‘A fully adaptive PMU-based fault location algorithm for series-compensated lines,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 2129–2137, Sep. 2014. [312] C. J. Lee, J. B. Park, J. R. Shin, and Z. M. Radojevie, ‘‘A new twoterminal numerical algorithm for fault location, distance protection, and arcing fault recognition,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1460–1462, Aug. 2006. [313] S. M. Brahma and A. A. Girgis, ‘‘Fault location on a transmission line using synchronized Voltage measurements,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1619–1622, Oct. 2004. [314] S. M. Brahma, ‘‘Fault location scheme for a multi-terminal transmission line using synchronized voltage measurements,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1325–1331, Apr. 2005. [315] Q. Jiang, X. Li, B. Wang, and H. Wang, ‘‘PMU-based fault location using voltage measurements in large transmission networks,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 1644–1652, Jul. 2012. [316] H. Zhu and G. B. Giannakis, ‘‘Sparse overcomplete representations for efficient identification of power line outages,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 2215–2224, Nov. 2012. [317] H. Sehwail and I. Dobson, ‘‘Applying synchrophasor computations to a specific area,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 3503–3504, Aug. 2013. 1624

[318] R. Emami and A. Abur, ‘‘External system line outage identification using phasor measurement units,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 1035–1040, May 2013. [319] C. Chen, J. Wang, and H. Zhu, ‘‘Effects of phasor measurement uncertainty on power line outage detection,’’ IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 1127–1139, Dec. 2014. [320] J.-C. Chen, W.-T. Li, C.-K. Wen, J.-H. Teng, and P. Ting, ‘‘Efficient identification method for power line outages in the smart power grid,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1788–1800, Jul. 2014. [321] Z. Xu and T. S. Sidhu, ‘‘Fault location method based on single-end measurements for underground cables,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 2845–2854, Oct. 2011. [322] C.-W. Liu, T.-C. Lin, C.-S. Yu, and J.-Z. Yang, ‘‘A fault location technique for two-terminal multisection compound transmission lines using synchronized phasor measurements,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 113–121, Mar. 2012. [323] J. Ren, S. S. Venkata, and E. Sortomme, ‘‘An accurate synchrophasor based fault location method for emerging distribution systems,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 297–298, Feb. 2004. [324] K. Mei, S. M. Rovnyak, and C.-M. Ong, ‘‘Clustering-based dynamic event location using wide-area phasor measurements,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 673–679, May 2008. [325] Z. Lin et al., ‘‘Application of wide area measurement systems to islanding detection of bulk power systems,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 2006–2015, May 2013. [326] R. Sun and V. A. Centeno, ‘‘Wide area system islanding contingency detecting and warning scheme,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 2581–2589, Nov. 2014. [327] J. Ma, P. Zhang, H.-J. Fu, B. Bo, and Z.-Y. Dong, ‘‘Application of phasor measurement unit on locating disturbance source for low-frequency oscillation,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 340–346, Dec. 2010. [328] L. Xie, Y. Chen, and P. R. Kumar, ‘‘Dimensionality reduction of synchrophasor data for early event detection: Linearized analysis,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 2784–2794, Nov. 2014. [329] O. P. Dahal, S. M. Brahma, and H. Cao, ‘‘Comprehensive clustering of disturbance events recorded by phasor measurement units,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 1390–1397, Jun. 2014. [330] W. Wang et al., ‘‘Multiple event detection and recognition through sparse unmixing for high-resolution situational awareness in power grid,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1654–1664, Jul. 2014. [331] J. Rasmussen and P. Jorgensen, ‘‘Synchronized phasor measurements of a power system event in eastern denmark,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 278–284, Feb. 2006. [332] R. J. Murphy, ‘‘Disturbance recorders trigger detection and protection,’’ IEEE Comput. Appl. Power, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 24–28, Jan. 1996. [333] O. Samuelsson, M. Hemmingsson, A. H. Nielsen, K. O. H. Pedersen, and J. Rasmussen, ‘‘Monitoring of power system events at transmission and distribution level,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 1007–1009, May 2006. [334] D. J. Trudnowski, J. W. Pierre, N. Zhou, J. F. Hauer, and M. Parashar, ‘‘Performance of three mode-meter block-processing algorithms for automated dynamic stability assessment,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 680–690, May 2008. [335] J. F. Hauer et al., ‘‘Use of the WECC WAMS in wide-area probing tests for validation of system performance and modeling,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 250–257, Feb. 2009. [336] S.-J. Tsai et al., ‘‘Frequency sensitivity and electromechanical propagation simulation study in large power systems,’’ IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I, Reg. Papers, vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 1819–1828, Aug. 2007. [337] P. Korba and K. Uhlen, ‘‘Wide-area monitoring of electromechanical oscillations in the nordic power system: Practical experience,’’ IET Generat., Transmiss. Distrib., vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 1116–1126, Oct. 2010. [338] A. Borghetti, C. A. Nucci, M. Paolone, G. Ciappi, and A. Solari, ‘‘Synchronized phasors monitoring during the islanding maneuver of an active distribution network,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 82–91, Mar. 2011. [339] V. Salehi, A. Mohamed, A. Mazloomzadeh, and O. A. Mohammed, ‘‘Laboratory-based smart power system, part I: Design and system development,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1394–1404, Sep. 2012. [340] V. Salehi, A. Mohamed, A. Mazloomzadeh, and O. A. Mohammed, ‘‘Laboratory-based smart power system, part II: Control, monitoring, and protection,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1405–1417, Sep. 2012. VOLUME 2, 2014

F. Aminifar et al.: SMT in Power Systems

[341] S. Rovnyak, S. Kretsinger, J. Thorp, and D. Brown, ‘‘Decision trees for real-time transient stability prediction,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1417–1426, Aug. 1994. [342] R. Diao, V. Vittal, and N. Logic, ‘‘Design of a real-time security assessment tool for situational awareness enhancement in modern power systems,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 957–965, May 2010. [343] T. Guo and J. V. Milanovic, ‘‘Probabilistic framework for assessing the accuracy of data mining tool for online prediction of transient stability,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 377–385, Jan. 2014. [344] C.-W. Liu, J. S. Thorp, J. Lu, R. J. Thomas, and H.-D. Chiang, ‘‘Detection of transiently chaotic swings in power systems using real-time phasor measurements,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1285–1292, Aug. 1994. [345] J. Yan, C.-C. Liu, and U. Vaidya, ‘‘PMU-based monitoring of rotor angle dynamics,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 2125–2133, Nov. 2011. [346] C.-W. Liu and J. S. Thorp, ‘‘Application of synchronised phasor measurements to real-time transient stability prediction,’’ IET Generat., Transmiss. Distrib., vol. 142, no. 4, pp. 355–360, Jul. 1995. [347] C.-W. Liu and J. S. Thorp, ‘‘New methods for computing power system dynamic response for real-time transient stability prediction,’’ IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I, Fundam. Theory Appl., vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 324–337, Mar. 2000. [348] F. Hashiesh, H. E. Mostafa, A.-R. Khatib, I. Helal, and M. M. Mansour, ‘‘An intelligent wide area synchrophasor based system for predicting and mitigating transient instabilities,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 645–652, Jun. 2012. [349] C.-W. Liu, M.-C. Su, S.-S. Tsay, and Y.-J. Wang, ‘‘Application of a novel fuzzy neural network to real-time transient stability swings prediction based on synchronized phasor measurements,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 685–692, May 1999. [350] F. R. Gomez, A. D. Rajapakse, U. D. Annakkage, and I. T. Fernando, ‘‘Support vector machine-based algorithm for post-fault transient stability status prediction using synchronized measurements,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1474–1483, Aug. 2011. [351] J. C. Cepeda, J. L. Rueda, D. G. Colomé, and D. E. Echeverría, ‘‘Real-time transient stability assessment based on centre-of-inertia estimation from phasor measurement unit records,’’ IET Generat., Transmiss. Distrib., vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 1363–1376, Aug. 2014. [352] E. Ghahremani and I. Kamwa, ‘‘Online state estimation of a synchronous generator using unscented Kalman filter from phasor measurements units,’’ IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 1099–1108, Dec. 2011. [353] I. Kamwa, R. Grondin, and L. Loud, ‘‘Time-varying contingency screening for dynamic security assessment using intelligent-systems techniques,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 526–536, Aug. 2001. [354] N. Zhou, J. W. Pierre, and J. F. Hauer, ‘‘Initial results in power system identification from injected probing signals using a subspace method,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1296–1302, Aug. 2006. [355] S. A. Nezam Sarmadi and V. Venkatasubramanian, ‘‘Electromechanical mode estimation using recursive adaptive stochastic subspace identification,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 349–358, Jan. 2014. [356] A. R. Messina, V. Vittal, D. Ruiz-Vega, and G. Enriquez-Harper, ‘‘Interpretation and visualization of wide-area PMU measurements using Hilbert analysis,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1763–1771, Nov. 2006. [357] J. H. Chow, A. Chakrabortty, M. Arcak, B. Bhargava, and A. Salazar, ‘‘Synchronized phasor data based energy function analysis of dominant power transfer paths in large power systems,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 727–734, May 2007. [358] A. R. Messina and V. Vittal, ‘‘Extraction of dynamic patterns from widearea measurements using empirical orthogonal functions,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 682–692, May 2007. [359] A. R. Messina, V. Vittal, G. T. Heydt, and T. J. Browne, ‘‘Nonstationary approaches to trend identification and denoising of measured power system oscillations,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 1798–1807, Nov. 2009. [360] J.-Z. Yang, C.-W. Liu, and W.-G. Wu, ‘‘A hybrid method for the estimation of power system low-frequency oscillation parameters,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 2115–2123, Nov. 2007. [361] K. Sun, S. Likhate, V. Vittal, V. S. Kolluri, and S. Mandal, ‘‘An online dynamic security assessment scheme using phasor measurements and decision trees,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1935–1943, Nov. 2007. VOLUME 2, 2014

[362] I. Kamwa, S. R. Samantaray, and G. Joos, ‘‘Development of rule-based classifiers for rapid stability assessment of wide-area post-disturbance records,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 258–270, Feb. 2009. [363] I. Kamwa, S. R. Samantaray, and G. Joos, ‘‘Catastrophe predictors from ensemble decision-tree learning of wide-area severity indices,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 144–158, Sep. 2010. [364] S. R. Samantaray, I. Kamwa, and G. Joos, ‘‘Ensemble decision trees for phasor measurement unit-based wide-area security assessment in the operations time frame,’’ IET Generat., Transmiss. Distrib., vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 1334–1348, Dec. 2010. [365] M. He, V. Vittal, and J. Zhang, ‘‘Online dynamic security assessment with missing PMU measurements: A data mining approach,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 1969–1977, May 2013. [366] B. A. Archer, U. D. Annakkage, B. Jayasekara, and P. Wijetunge, ‘‘Accurate prediction of damping in large interconnected power systems with the aid of regression analysis,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1170–1178, Aug. 2008. [367] V. S. Peric and L. Vanfretti, ‘‘Power-system ambient-mode estimation considering spectral load properties,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 1133–1143, May 2014. [368] D. J. Trudnowski, ‘‘Estimating electromechanical mode shape from synchrophasor measurements,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1188–1195, Aug. 2008. [369] G. Ghanavati, P. D. H. Hines, T. I. Lakoba, and E. Cotilla-Sanchez, ‘‘Understanding early indicators of critical transitions in power systems from autocorrelation functions,’’ IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I, Reg. Papers, vol. 61, no. 9, pp. 2747–2760, Sep. 2014. [370] A. Kaci, I. Kamwa, L. A. Dessaint, and S. Guillon, ‘‘Synchrophasor data baselining and mining for online monitoring of dynamic security limits,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 2681–2695, Nov. 2014. [371] N. Zhou, D. J. Trudnowski, J. W. Pierre, and W. A. Mittelstadt, ‘‘Electromechanical mode online estimation using regularized robust RLS methods,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1670–1680, Nov. 2008. [372] J. C.-H. Peng and N.-K. C. Nair, ‘‘Adaptive sampling scheme for monitoring oscillations using Prony analysis,’’ IET Generat., Transmiss. Distrib., vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 1052–1060, Dec. 2009. [373] R. H. Salim and R. A. Ramos, ‘‘A model-based approach for small-signal stability assessment of unbalanced power systems,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 2006–2014, Nov. 2012. [374] J. Ma, Y. V. Makarov, R. Diao, P. V. Etingov, J. E. Dagle, and E. De Tuglie, ‘‘The characteristic ellipsoid methodology and its application in power systems,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 2206–2214, Nov. 2012. [375] N. R. Chaudhuri and B. Chaudhuri, ‘‘Damping and relative mode-shape estimation in near real-time through phasor approach,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 364–373, Feb. 2011. [376] N. Kakimoto, M. Sugumi, T. Makino, and K. Tomiyama, ‘‘Monitoring of interarea oscillation mode by synchronized phasor measurement,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 260–268, Feb. 2006. [377] N. Zhou, J. W. Pierre, and D. Trudnowski, ‘‘A stepwise regression method for estimating dominant electromechanical modes,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 1051–1059, May 2012. [378] P. McNabb, D. Wilson, and J. Bialek, ‘‘Classification of mode damping and amplitude in power systems using synchrophasor measurements and classification trees,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 1988–1996, May 2013. [379] L. Dosiek and J. W. Pierre, ‘‘Estimating electromechanical modes and mode shapes using the multichannel ARMAX model,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 1950–1959, May 2013. [380] D. Cai, P. Regulski, M. Osborne, and V. Terzija, ‘‘Wide area inter-area oscillation monitoring using fast nonlinear estimation algorithm,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1721–1731, Sep. 2013. [381] C. Zheng, V. Malbasa, and M. Kezunovic, ‘‘Regression tree for stability margin prediction using synchrophasor measurements,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 1978–1987, May 2013. [382] Z. Tashman, H. Khalilinia, and V. Venkatasubramanian, ‘‘Multi-dimensional Fourier ringdown analysis for power systems using synchrophasors,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 731–741, Mar. 2014. [383] K. Sun, Q. Zhou, and Y. Liu, ‘‘A phase locked loop-based approach to real-time modal analysis on synchrophasor measurements,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 260–269, Jan. 2014. 1625

F. Aminifar et al.: SMT in Power Systems

[384] Y. Chompoobutrgool and L. Vanfretti, ‘‘Identification of power system dominant inter-area oscillation paths,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 2798–2807, Aug. 2013. [385] Y. V. Makarov et al., ‘‘PMU-based wide-area security assessment: Concept, method, and implementation,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1325–1332, Sep. 2012. [386] P. Tripathy, S. C. Srivastava, and S. N. Singh, ‘‘A divide-by-differencefilter based algorithm for estimation of generator rotor angle utilizing synchrophasor measurements,’’ IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 1562–1570, Jun. 2010. [387] E. Ghahremani and I. Kamwa, ‘‘Dynamic state estimation in power system by applying the extended Kalman filter with unknown inputs to phasor measurements,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 2556–2566, Nov. 2011. [388] M. Jonsson, M. Begovic, and J. Daalder, ‘‘A new method suitable for real-time generator coherency determination,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 1473–1482, Aug. 2004. [389] I. Dobson, ‘‘Voltages across an area of a network,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 993–1002, May 2012. [390] C.-W. Liu, C.-S. Chang, and M.-C. Su, ‘‘Neuro-fuzzy networks for voltage security monitoring based on synchronized phasor measurements,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 326–332, May 1998. [391] B. Milosevic and M. Begovic, ‘‘Voltage-stability protection and control using a wide-area network of phasor measurements,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 121–127, Feb. 2003. [392] S. Corsi and G. N. Taranto, ‘‘A real-time voltage instability identification algorithm based on local phasor measurements,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1271–1279, Aug. 2008. [393] R. Sodhi, S. C. Srivastava, and S. N. Singh, ‘‘A simple scheme for wide area detection of impending voltage instability,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 818–827, Jun. 2012. [394] I. R. Pordanjani, Y. Wang, and W. Xu, ‘‘Identification of critical components for voltage stability assessment using channel components transform,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1122–1132, Jun. 2013. [395] S. Dasgupta, M. Paramasivam, U. Vaidya, and V. Ajjarapu, ‘‘Real-time monitoring of short-term voltage stability using PMU data,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 3702–3711, Nov. 2013. [396] J.-H. Liu and C.-C. Chu, ‘‘Wide-area measurement-based voltage stability indicators by modified coupled single-port models,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 756–764, Mar. 2014. [397] I. Smon, G. Verbic, and F. Gubina, ‘‘Local voltage-stability index using Tellegen’s theorem,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1267–1275, Aug. 2006. [398] R. Diao et al., ‘‘Decision tree-based online voltage security assessment using PMU measurements,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 832–839, May 2009. [399] H. Khoshkhoo and S. M. Shahrtash, ‘‘Fast online dynamic voltage instability prediction and voltage stability classification,’’ IET Generat., Transmiss. Distrib., vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 957–965, May 2014. [400] M. Glavic and T. Van Cutsem, ‘‘Wide-area detection of voltage instability from synchronized phasor measurements. Part I: Principle,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1408–1416, Aug. 2009. [401] M. Glavic and T. Van Cutsem, ‘‘Wide-area detection of voltage instability from synchronized phasor measurements. Part II: Simulation results,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1417–1425, Aug. 2009. [402] D. Q. Zhou, U. D. Annakkage, and A. D. Rajapakse, ‘‘Online monitoring of voltage stability margin using an artificial neural network,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 1566–1574, Aug. 2010. [403] W. Xu, I. R. Pordanjani, Y. Wang, and E. Vaahedi, ‘‘A network decoupling transform for phasor data based voltage stability analysis and monitoring,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 261–270, Mar. 2012. [404] Y. C. Chen, A. D. Dominguez-Garcia, and P. W. Sauer, ‘‘Measurementbased estimation of linear sensitivity distribution factors and applications,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 1372–1382, May 2014. [405] G. C. Zweigle and V. Venkatasubramanian, ‘‘Wide-area optimal control of electric power systems with application to transient stability for higher order contingencies,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 2313–2320, Aug. 2013. [406] C. W. Taylor, D. C. Erickson, K. E. Martin, R. E. Wilson, and V. Venkatasubramanian, ‘‘WACS-wide-area stability and voltage control system: R&D and online demonstration,’’ Proc. IEEE, vol. 93, no. 5, pp. 892–906, May 2005. 1626

[407] C. Liu et al., ‘‘A systematic approach for dynamic security assessment and the corresponding preventive control scheme based on decision trees,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 717–730, Mar. 2014. [408] H. Morais, P. Vancraeyveld, A. H. Birger Pedersen, M. Lind, H. Johannsson, and J. Ostergaard, ‘‘SOSPO-SP: Secure operation of sustainable power systems simulation platform for real-time system state evaluation and control,’’ IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 2318–2329, Nov. 2014. [409] S. E. Stanton, C. Slivinsky, K. Martin, and J. Nordstorm, ‘‘Application of phasor measurements and partial energy analysis in stabilizing large disturbances,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 297–306, Feb. 1995. [410] D. N. Kosterev, J. Esztergalyos, and C. A. Stigers, ‘‘Feasibility study of using synchronized phasor measurements for generator dropping controls in the Colstrip system,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 755–761, Aug. 1998. [411] I. Kamwa, R. Grondin, and Y. Hebert, ‘‘Wide-area measurement based stabilizing control of large power systems-a decentralized/hierarchical approach,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 136–153, Feb. 2001. [412] D. Molina, G. K. Venayagamoorthy, J. Liang, and R. G. Harley, ‘‘Intelligent local area signals based damping of power system oscillations using virtual generators and approximate dynamic programming,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 498–508, Mar. 2013. [413] J. Ma et al., ‘‘Application of dual Youla parameterization based adaptive wide-area damping control for power system oscillations,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1602–1610, Jul. 2014. [414] X. M. Mao, Y. Zhang, L. Guan, X. C. Wu, and N. Zhang, ‘‘Improving power system dynamic performance using wide-area high-voltage direct current damping control,’’ IET Generat., Transmiss. Distrib., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 245–251, Mar. 2008. [415] J. He, C. Lu, X. Wu, P. Li, and J. Wu, ‘‘Design and experiment of wide area HVDC supplementary damping controller considering time delay in China southern power grid,’’ IET Generat., Transmiss. Distrib., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 17–25, Jan. 2009. [416] Q. Gao and S. M. Rovnyak, ‘‘Decision trees using synchronized phasor measurements for wide-area response-based control,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 855–861, May 2011. [417] J. Ma, T. Wang, Z. Wang, and J. S. Thorp, ‘‘Adaptive damping control of inter-area oscillations based on federated Kalman filter using wide area signals,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 1627–1635, May 2013. [418] M. Zarghami, M. L. Crow, and S. Jagannathan, ‘‘Nonlinear control of FACTS controllers for damping interarea oscillations in power systems,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 3113–3121, Oct. 2010. [419] N. R. Chaudhuri et al., ‘‘Wide-area power oscillation damping control in nordic equivalent system,’’ IET Generat., Transmiss. Distrib., vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 1139–1150, Oct. 2010. [420] A. Chakrabortty, ‘‘Wide-area damping control of power systems using dynamic clustering and TCSC-based redesigns,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1503–1514, Sep. 2012. [421] A. E. Leon, J. M. Mauricio, A. Gomez-Expósito, and J. A. Solsona, ‘‘Hierarchical wide-area control of power systems including wind farms and FACTS for short-term frequency regulation,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 2084–2092, Nov. 2012. [422] M. Mokhtari, F. Aminifar, D. Nazarpour, and S. Golshannavaz, ‘‘Wide-area power oscillation damping with a fuzzy controller compensating the continuous communication delays,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 1997–2005, May 2013. [423] J. Ma, T. Wang, X. Gao, S. Wang, and Z. Wang, ‘‘Classification and regression tree-based adaptive damping control of inter-area oscillations using wide-area signals,’’ IET Generat., Transmiss. Distrib., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 1177–1186, Jun. 2014. [424] T. Wang, Z. Wang, J. Liu, J. S. Thorp, and Y. Yang, ‘‘Classification and regression tree-based adaptive damping control of inter-area oscillations using wide-area signals,’’ IET Generat., Transmiss. Distrib., vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 1516–1527, 2014. [425] A. E. Leon and J. A. Solsona, ‘‘Power oscillation damping improvement by adding multiple wind farms to wide-area coordinating controls,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 1356–1364, May 2014. [426] M. Mokhtari and F. Aminifar, ‘‘Toward wide-area oscillation control through doubly-fed induction generator wind farms,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 2985–2992, Nov. 2014. VOLUME 2, 2014

F. Aminifar et al.: SMT in Power Systems

[427] D. Dotta, A. S. e Silva, and I. C. Decker, ‘‘Wide-area measurements-based two-level control design considering signal transmission delay,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 208–216, Feb. 2009. [428] N. R. Chaudhuri, S. Ray, R. Majumder, and B. Chaudhuri, ‘‘A new approach to continuous latency compensation with adaptive phasor power oscillation damping controller (POD),’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 939–946, May 2010. [429] N. R. Chaudhuri, B. Chaudhuri, S. Ray, and R. Majumder, ‘‘Wide-area phasor power oscillation damping controller: A new approach to handling time-varying signal latency,’’ IET Generat., Transmiss. Distrib., vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 620–630, May 2010. [430] N. R. Chaudhuri, D. Chakraborty, and B. Chaudhuri, ‘‘An architecture for FACTS controllers to deal with bandwidth-constrained communication,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 188–196, Jan. 2011. [431] S. Wang, W. Gao, J. Wang, and J. Lin, ‘‘Synchronized sampling technology-based compensation for network effects in WAMS communication,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 837–845, Jun. 2012. [432] S. Wang, X. Meng, and T. Chen, ‘‘Wide-area control of power systems through delayed network communication,’’ IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 495–503, Mar. 2012. [433] L. Cheng, G. Chen, F. Zhang, G. Li, and W. Gao, ‘‘Adaptive time delay compensator (ATDC) design for wide-area power system stabilizer,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 2957–2966, Nov. 2014. [434] K. Zhu and L. Nordstrom, ‘‘Design of wide-area damping systems based on the capabilities of the supporting information communication technology infrastructure,’’ IET Generat., Transmiss. Distrib., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 640–650, 2014. [435] K. Zhu, M. Chenine, L. Nordstrom, S. Holmstrom, and G. Ericsson, ‘‘Design requirements of wide-area damping systems—Using empirical data from a utility IP network,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 829–838, Mar. 2014. [436] S. Zhang and V. Vital, ‘‘Design of wide-area power system damping controllers resilient to communication failures,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 4292–4300, Nov. 2013. [437] S. Zhang and V. Vittal, ‘‘Wide-area control resiliency using redundant communication paths,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 2189–2199, Sep. 2014. [438] M. Glavic et al., ‘‘See it fast to keep calm: Real-time voltage control under stressed conditions,’’ IEEE Power Energy Mag., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 43–55, Jul./Aug. 2012. [439] H.-Y. Su and C.-W. Liu, ‘‘An adaptive PMU-based secondary voltage control scheme,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1514–1522, Sep. 2013. [440] G. Fusco and M. Russo, ‘‘Self-tuning regulator design for nodal voltage waveform control in electrical power systems,’’ IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 258–266, Mar. 2003. [441] F. Badrkhani Ajaei, S. Afsharnia, A. Kahrobaeian, and S. Farhangi, ‘‘A fast and effective control scheme for the dynamic voltage restorer,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 2398–2406, Oct. 2011. [442] R. Bottura and A. Borghetti, ‘‘Simulation of the volt/var control in distribution feeders by means of a networked multiagent system,’’ IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 2340–2353, Nov. 2014. [443] R. J. Best, D. J. Morrow, D. M. Laverty, and P. A. Crossley, ‘‘Synchrophasor broadcast over Internet protocol for distributed generator synchronization,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 2835–2841, Oct. 2010. [444] R. J. Best, D. J. Morrow, D. J. McGowan, and P. A. Crossley, ‘‘Synchronous islanded operation of a diesel generator,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 2170–2176, Nov. 2007. [445] R. J. Best, D. J. Morrow, D. M. Laverty, and P. A. Crossley, ‘‘Techniques for multiple-set synchronous islanding control,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 60–67, Mar. 2011. [446] N. C. Seeley, C. Craig, and T. Rainey, ‘‘Advances in power generator control: Precise control of power systems islands using time-synchronized measurements,’’ IEEE Ind. Appl. Mag., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 44–52, Mar./Apr. 2014. [447] S. A. Nezam Sarmadi, A. S. Dobakhshari, S. Azizi, and A. M. Ranjbar, ‘‘A sectionalizing method in power system restoration based on WAMS,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 190–197, Mar. 2011. [448] W. Liu, Z. Lin, F. Wen, and G. Ledwich, ‘‘A wide area monitoring system based load restoration method,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 2025–2034, May 2013. VOLUME 2, 2014

[449] J. Bertsch, C. Carnal, D. Karlson, J. McDaniel, and K. Vu, ‘‘Wide-area protection and power system utilization,’’ Proc. IEEE, vol. 93, no. 5, pp. 997–1003, May 2005. [450] S. Horowitz, D. Novosel, V. Madani, and M. Adamiak, ‘‘Systemwide protection,’’ IEEE Power Energy Mag., vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 34–42, Sep./Oct. 2008. [451] H. Khorashadi-Zadeh and Z. Li, ‘‘Design of a novel phasor measurement unit-based transmission line auto reclosing scheme,’’ IET Generat., Transmiss. Distrib., vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 806–813, Aug. 2011. [452] E. E. Bernabeu, J. Thorp, and V. Centeno, ‘‘Methodology for a security/dependability adaptive protection scheme based on data mining,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 104–111, Jan. 2012. [453] J. Ma, J. Li, J. S. Thorp, A. J. Arana, Q. Yang, and A. G. Phadke, ‘‘A fault steady state component-based wide area backup protection algorithm,’’ IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 468–475, Sep. 2011. [454] P. V. Navalkar and S. A. Soman, ‘‘Secure remote backup protection of transmission lines using synchrophasors,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 87–96, Jan. 2011. [455] P. K. Nayak, A. K. Pradhan, and P. Bajpai, ‘‘Wide-area measurementbased backup protection for power network with series compensation,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1970–1977, Aug. 2014. [456] P. Kundu and A. K. Pradhan, ‘‘Synchrophasor-assisted zone 3 operation,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 660–667, Apr. 2014. [457] N. Senroy and G. T. Heydt, ‘‘A conceptual framework for the controlled islanding of interconnected power systems,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 1005–1006, May 2006. [458] K. Sun, K. Hur, and P. Zhang, ‘‘A new unified scheme for controlled power system separation using synchronized phasor measurements,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1544–1554, Aug. 2011. [459] R. Franco, C. Sena, G. N. Taranto, and A. Giusto, ‘‘Using synchrophasors for controlled islanding—A prospective application for the Uruguayan power system,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 2016–2024, May 2013. [460] V. Centeno, J. De La Ree, A. G. Phadke, G. Michel, R. J. Murphy, and R. O. Burnett, Jr., ‘‘Adaptive out-of-step relaying using phasor measurement techniques,’’ IEEE Comput. Appl. Power, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 12–17, Oct. 1993. [461] V. Centeno, A. G. Phadke, A. Edris, J. Benton, M. Gaudi, and G. Michel, ‘‘An adaptive out-of-step relay [for power system protection],’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 61–71, Jan. 1997. [462] B. Grcar, J. Ritonja, B. Polajzer, and A. M. Stankovic, ‘‘Estimation methods using dynamic phasors for numerical distance protection,’’ IET Generat., Transmiss. Distrib., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 433–443, 2008. [463] K. Seethalekshmi, S. N. Singh, and S. C. Srivastava, ‘‘Synchrophasor assisted adaptive reach setting of distance relays in presence of UPFC,’’ IEEE Syst. J., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 396–405, Sep. 2011. [464] K. Seethalekshmi, S. N. Singh, and S. C. Srivastava, ‘‘A classification approach using support vector machines to prevent distance relay maloperation under power swing and voltage instability,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 1124–1133, Jul. 2012. [465] J. S. Thorp, A. G. Phadke, S. H. Horowitz, and M. M. Begovic, ‘‘Some applications of phasor measurements to adaptive protection,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 791–798, May 1998. [466] S. Dambhare, S. A. Soman, and M. C. Chandorkar, ‘‘Adaptive current differential protection schemes for transmission-line protection,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 1832–1841, Oct. 2009. [467] M. M. Eissa, M. E. Masoud, and M. M. M. Elanwar, ‘‘A novel back up wide area protection technique for power transmission grids using phasor measurement unit,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 270–278, Jan. 2010. [468] J.-A. Jiang, C.-W. Liu, and C.-S. Chen, ‘‘A novel adaptive PMU-based transmission-line relay-design and EMTP simulation results,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 930–937, Oct. 2002. [469] Z. Radojevic and V. Terzija, ‘‘Numerical algorithm for overhead lines protection and disturbance records analysis,’’ IET Generat., Transmiss. Distrib., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 357–363, Mar. 2007. [470] C. P. Reddy, S. Chakrabarti, and S. C. Srivastava, ‘‘A sensitivity-based method for under-frequency load-shedding,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 984–985, Mar. 2014. [471] J. Tang, J. Liu, F. Ponci, and A. Monti, ‘‘Adaptive load shedding based on combined frequency and voltage stability assessment using synchrophasor measurements,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 2035–2047, May 2013. 1627

F. Aminifar et al.: SMT in Power Systems

[472] S. Abdelwahid, A. Babiker, A. Eltom, and G. Kobet, ‘‘Hardware implementation of an automatic adaptive centralized underfrequency load shedding scheme,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 2664–2673, Dec. 2014. [473] S. M. Brahma and A. A. Girgis, ‘‘Development of adaptive protection scheme for distribution systems with high penetration of distributed generation,’’ IEEE Trans. Power Del., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 56–63, Jan. 2004.

AMIR SAFDARIAN (S’11) received the B.Sc. degree from Tehran University, Tehran, Iran, in 2008, and the M.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees from the Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, in 2010 and 2014, respectively, where he is currently an Associate Researcher with the Smart Grid Laboratory, Department of Electrical Engineering. He is also collaborating with the Power Systems and High Voltage Engineering Research Group, Department of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland. He was a recipient of the 2013 IEEE Power System Operation Transactions Prize Paper Award. His research interests include power system reliability, distribution network operation and planning, and smart grid issues.

FARROKH AMINIFAR (S’07–M’11) is currently an Assistant Professor with the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. He has been collaborating with the Robert W. Galvin Center for Electricity Innovation, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, USA, since 2009. His current research interests include wide-area measurement systems, reliability modeling and assessment, and smart-grid technologies. He has served as the Guest Editor-in-Chief and an Editor of three Special Issues of the IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID. He received the IEEE Best Ph.D. Dissertation Award from the Iran Section for his research on the probabilistic schemes for the placement of pharos measurement units. He was a recipient of the 2013 IEEE/Power System Operation Transactions Prize Paper Award.

ALI DAVOUDI (S’04–M’11) received the Ph.D. degree in electrical and computer engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana—Champaign, USA, in 2010. He was with SolarBridge Technologies, Champaign, IL, USA, Texas Instruments Inc., Rochester, MN, USA, and Royal Philips Electronics, Rosemont, IL. He is currently an Assistant Professor with the Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Texas, Arlington, TX, USA. He is an Associate Editor of the IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENERGY CONVERSION, the IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS, and the IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON TRANSPORTATION ELECTRIFICATION. His research interests are in various aspects of modeling and control of power electronics and finite-inertia power systems.

MAHMUD FOTUHI-FIRUZABAD (F’14) received the B.S. degree from the Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran, in 1986, the M.S. degree from Tehran University, Tehran, in 1989, and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada, in 1993 and 1997, respectively, all in electrical engineering. He joined the Department of Electrical Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, in 2002, where he is currently a Professor and the President. He is a member of the Center of Excellence in Power System Management and Control with the Sharif University of Technology.

1628

MOHAMMAD SHAHIDEHPOUR (F’01) is currently the Bodine Chair Professor and Director of the Robert W. Galvin Center for Electricity Innovation with the Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, USA. He is a Research Professor with King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, North China Electric Power University, Beijing, China, and the Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran. He was a recipient of the Honorary Doctorate from the Polytechnic University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania, in 2009. He is the IEEE Distinguished Lecturer, the Chair of the IEEE Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference and the Great Lakes Symposium on Smart Grid and the New Energy Economy in 2012, and the Editor-in-Chief of the IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID. He was also a recipient of the IEEE PES Outstanding Power Engineering Educator Award in 2012.

VOLUME 2, 2014