Template User Guide

10 downloads 0 Views 225KB Size Report
Jun 8, 2018 - require the user to manually prepare the AST dilution and transfer the AST cards between ... From an 18-24 hour culture, a DensiCHEK Plus instrument was used to create a suspension ... Simone.franklin@biomerieux.com.
Performance of VITEK® 2 AST-GN Ceftazidime/Avibactam (S < 8/4 µg/mL and R ≥16/4 µg/mL) for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa S. FRANKLIN¹, H.P. DWIVEDI1, V. LABOMBARDI2,T. DAVIS3, R. HUMPHRIES4, J. HINDLER4, S. CAMPEAU4, P. DEOL1, 1bioMérieux, Inc., Hazelwood, MO; 2New York Presbyterian Hospital, Flushing, NY; 3Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, 4University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA. ASM 2018 ● Atlanta, GA Friday, June 8, 2018 Poster # 232

[email protected] 314.731.8754

Background: Ceftazidime/Avibactam (CZA) is a cephalosporin and beta-lactamase inhibitor combination drug with activity against extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)producing Enterobacteriaceae and multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa). In this study, the performance of VITEK2 CZA, an in vitro technique for determining the antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa, was evaluated against the CLSI broth microdilution (BMD) reference method Method: A total of 1073 isolates (866 Enterobacteriaceae and 207 P. aeruginosa) were tested by VITEK2 CZA method and BMD reference procedure (CLSI M07-A10). The results were analyzed for essential agreement (EA), category agreement (CA), major and very major error rates following FDA/ISO performance criteria using the FDA/EUCAST breakpoints for Ceftazidime/Avibactam (Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa S < 8/4 µg/mL and R ≥16/4 µg/mL). Results: VITEK2 CZA overall performance for Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa met the performance criteria for EA and CA, major errors and very major errors. The overall categorical major error rate for Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa combined was 1.4% (14/998). Nine (9) major errors were one dilution apart from the reference method and as such fall within EA. Based on the EA, and the lack of an intermediate breakpoint for Ceftazidime/Avibactam, the adjusted FDA categorical major error rate was 0.4% (3/829) for Enterobacteriaceae , 1.2% (2/169) for P. aeruginosa, and 0.5% (5/998) for all organisms combined. Table 1: Summary of VITEK2 CZA performance

Claimed Species Enterobacteriaceae (FDA) P. aeruginosa (FDA) Overall-FDA Overall-EUCAST

EA

Evaluate VITEK2 CZA performance when used with the VITEK®2 and VITEK®2 Compact Systems in a clinical setting, and to show the equivalency of the product to the CLSI BMD technique. Data obtained was used for submission to the FDA and CE marking. VITEK2 CZA is FDA 510 (k) approved and CE marked.

MATERIALS AND METHODS Fresh clinical and stock isolates were evaluated at three clinical trial sites in the United States. The range of species tested included Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa. Each isolate was first subcultured on TSA with sheep blood agar. From an 18-24 hour culture, a DensiCHEK Plus instrument was used to create a suspension with a 0.5-0.63 McFarland range. Clinical, Challenge, Reproducibility, and Quality Control (QC) isolates were tested on the VITEK®2 System with the auto dilution option. In addition, the VITEK®2 System with manual for inoculum preparation was evaluated for QC, Reproducibility and Challenge strains. The VITEK®2 Compact System was also evaluated during the clinical trial. Testing consisted of QC, Reproducibility and Challenge strains. One initial McFarland suspension was prepared for each isolate for inoculation of all the cards, and the reference when applicable. Table 2 : Sample type and testing method

1st card

CA

Table 5 : Frequency table of Overall Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa

OBJECTIVE

ABSTRACT

CA ME Rate

CA VME Rate

94.2% (816/866)

99.2% (859/866)

0.8% (7/829)

0.0% (0/37)

95.7% (198/207)

96.6% (200/207)

4.1% (7/169)

0.0% (0/38)

94.5% (1014/1073)

98.7% (1059/1073)

1.4% (14/998)

0.0% (0/75)

94.5% (1014/1073)

98.9%* (1061/1073)

1.2%* (12/998)

0.0% (0/75)

* Resolved data shown Conclusion: When compared to the BMD reference method, VITEK2 CZA proved to be a suitable test for susceptibility testing of Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa.

Total

EA

%EA

CA

%CA

#R

#ME

#VME

Citrobacter freundii

57

49

86.0%

57

100.0%

5

0

0

Citrobacter koseri

44

43

97.7%

44

100.0%

0

0

0

1

1

100.0%

1

100.0%

0

0

0

Enterobacter aerogenes

47

43

91.5%

46

97.9%

1

1

0

Enterobacter cloacae

43

43

100.0%

43

100.0%

9

0

0

Enterobacter cloacae cloacae

24

20

83.3%

24

100.0%

0

0

0

Enterobacter cloacae complex

19

19

100.0%

19

100.0%

0

0

0

169

163

96.4%

168

99.4%

7

1

0

48

46

95.8%

48

100.0%

3

0

0

103

97

94.2%

103

100.0%

1

0

0

Edwardsiella tarda

Escherichia coli Klebsiella oxytoca

Clinical and QC

Challenge and QC

Reproducibility

Klebsiella pneumoniae

65

63

96.9%

64

98.5%

7

1

0

VITEK®2 automatic dilution

VITEK®2 automatic dilution

VITEK®2 automatic dilution

Morganella morg. morganii

18

18

100.0%

18

100.0%

0

0

0

Morganella morganii

12

11

91.7%

12

100.0%

0

0

0

Proteus mirabilis

59

57

96.6%

59

100.0%

0

0

0

Proteus vulgaris

29

25

86.2%

29

100.0%

0

0

0

25

23

92.0%

23

92.0%

3

2

0

207

198

95.7%

200

96.6%

38

7

0

Salmonella enteritidis

7

7

100.0%

7

100.0%

0

0

0

Salmonella typhi

4

3

75.0%

4

100.0%

0

0

0

76

69

90.8%

74

97.4%

1

2

0

Shigella flexneri

1

1

100.0%

1

100.0%

0

0

0

Shigella sonnei

15

15

100.0%

15

100.0%

0

0

0

1073

1014

94.5%

1059

98.7%

75

14

0

VITEK®2 manual dilution

VITEK®2 manual dilution

3rd card

VITEK®2

VITEK®2

Yes

Compact manual

Compact manual

dilution

dilution

Providencia stuartii

Yes

No

P. aeruginosa

RESULTS

Serratia marcescens

Four gram-negative QC organisms were tested throughout comparative testing at each study site by both the VITEK2 CZA and BMD reference method containing CZA. The testing was performed a minimum of twenty times by both card and reference method at each site. Overall performance is shown in table 3 below. Table 3 : Quality Control

INTRODUCTION VITEK2 AST GN-CZA is an in vitro quantitative test device for determining the antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa against Ceftazidime / Avibactam (CZA). It determines the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) for Ceftazidime / Avibactam. The VITEK2 Susceptibility components are antimicrobials in combination with growth medium, which are incorporated into VITEK2 card products for use with the VITEK2 system for performing antimicrobial susceptibility testing of microorganisms in clinical laboratory settings. The VITEK2 AST card consists of a maximum of 64 wells. Each well contains an aliquot of a specific concentration of antimicrobial agent. Once the cards are placed in the VITEK®2 System along with the appropriate organism suspension, no additional handling is required. Dilutions (if required) are made automatically and the cards are inoculated using a vacuum filling process. The cards are sealed and placed into the reader / incubator automatically. The VITEK®2 Compact System will require the user to manually prepare the AST dilution and transfer the AST cards between filling and loading stations. For both the VITEK®2 and VITEK®2 Compact Systems, the computer determines growth based on the attenuation of light measured by an optical scanner. The data is used to determine the MIC values for the antimicrobial agents.

Organism

Klebsiella pneum. pneumoniae

2nd card

BMD

Table 6 : Frequency table of Overall Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa

To determine the reproducibility of the VITEK2 CZA test, ten on-scale gramnegative isolates were tested in triplicate each day for three days at three clinical trial sites. Overall performance is shown in table 4 below. Table 4 :Overall Combined Reproducibility

All species combined

Although within EA when compared to the reference method, errors (major and/or very major) were observed due to the lack of intermediate category. The overall categorical major error rate for Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa combined was 1.4% (14/998). Nine (9) major errors were one dilution apart from the reference method and as such fall within EA. Based on the EA, and the lack of an intermediate breakpoint for CZA, the adjusted categorical major error rate was 0.5% (5/998). Testing should be repeated using an alternative testing/reference method prior to reporting results for P. aeruginosa when the VITEK®2 MIC is ≥16 μg/mL due to observed major errors (4.1%). Due to a low overall EA, an alternate method of testing should also be used prior to reporting results for Providencia rettgeri isolates.

CONCLUSIONS When compared to the broth microdilution reference method, VITEK2 AST GN-CZA was found to be an accurate and reliable method for susceptibility testing of CZA providing MIC results for Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa. The addition of the VITEK2 CZA test to the current VITEK2 antimicrobial susceptibility test menu increases the options available to clinical laboratories for testing ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae and MDR P. aeruginosa isolates.