The 2017 March for Science

7 downloads 0 Views 96KB Size Report
did indicate that the march was political in nature ... very likely that your life has benefitted in some way ... took away from the 2017 Chicago March for Science.
JACC: BASIC TO TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE

VOL. 2, NO. 3, 2017

ª 2017 THE AUTHOR. PUBLISHED BY ELSEVIER ON BEHALF OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY FOUNDATION. THIS IS AN OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE UNDER

ISSN 2452-302X http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacbts.2017.05.001

THE CC BY-NC-ND LICENSE (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

EDITOR’S PAGE

The 2017 March for Science Douglas L. Mann, MD, FACC

W

hile attending a scientific meeting in

“Be like a positron, be positive!” I thought he totally

Chicago, I had the opportunity to join

killed it.

40,000 other people who rallied on

Whether you are a Republican, a Democrat, or an

Saturday morning, April 22, 2017, to participate in

Independent, or even don’t care about politics, it is

the 2017 March for Science. The march coincided

very likely that your life has benefitted in some way

with Earth Day, and was 1 of about 600 events taking

from the translation of science into our everyday

place worldwide, which were intended to celebrate

lives. Unfortunately, there has been a slow burning

science, as well as draw attention to the skepticism

distrust of science and the scientific community in

that has grown around scientific facts over the past

both the government, as well as in society. Part of the

several years. The day began with a rally in Grant

blame may be our inability as scientists to commu-

Park that included speeches by several prominent

nicate effectively, part of this may relate to the ten-

scientists who lived in Chicago. Shortly after the

dency of scientists to overhype their work, and part of

speeches, participants marched down Columbus

this may relate to the long-lasting damaging effects

Drive to the Field Museum, where >50 science-

of fraudulent research. Dr. David Skorton, who is

related research groups and nonprofit organizations

the current Secretary of the Smithsonian Institute,

were stationed for a 3-h science exposition. I was

believes that “.scientific, medical, and public health

fortunate enough to strike up a conversation with

developments sometimes fail to gain public accep-

several scientists who were attending the annual

tance for reasons that lie far outside the realm of

American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular

science. And that is not the fault of the public—that is

Biology (ASBMB) meeting. They invited me to walk

our fault as scientists” (1). He also remarked that

with them under their ASBMB banner, which I

“Scientists need not only to explain much more

proudly did. Although the organizers of the march

clearly and compellingly what we are doing, but also

stated that it was not intended to be partisan, they

to establish on social, cultural, and emotional levels

did indicate that the march was political in nature

why our work is important. We need to respect cul-

and was intended to defend scientific research from

tural differences that lead to misunderstanding and

attack, including proposed U.S. government budget

even fear of science.” In an article in The Atlantic

cuts under President Trump, especially the proposed

magazine entitled “What Exactly Are People March-

20% cut to the National Institutes of Health. Aside

ing for When They March for Science?,” activist Beka

from the sense of comradery that everyone felt

Economopoulos stated that “Science is not an inher-

that day, the other highlight was reading the clever

ently noble pursuit: the same process that leads to

signs that people were carrying. There were the

medical treatments also gave us nuclear weapons and

inevitable partisan signs (“Get your tiny hands off

eugenics. Science is a tool.. The relevant question is:

my science”), the ubiquitous Earth Day signs (“There

whose interests does science serve?” (2). Econo-

is no Planet B!”), and then there was my favorite sign

mopoulos stated that she marched for science on

that was carried by an 8-year-old boy who had a

April 22nd to ensure that science was pointed in the

streak of his blond hair dyed blue, which read:

right direction. As editor-in-chief of a new journal that is devoted entirely to publishing scientific discoveries that are intended to improve the outcomes of patients

From the Center for Cardiovascular Research, Department of Medicine,

afflicted with cardiovascular disease, my goal is

Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.

to ensure that that JACC: Basic to Translational

Mann

JACC: BASIC TO TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE VOL. 2, NO. 3, 2017 JUNE 2017:344–5

Editor’s Page

Science is always pointed in the right direction and

was the certainty that, now, more than ever before,

that we communicate that direction effectively.

we need to remain positive—like a positron—about

Whenever the editorial board discusses papers that

effectively communicating the immense contribu-

have been submitted to us, we first begin by discus-

tions that science has made to all of our lives, and

sing the quality of the science, and then end by

that we need to continue to support the ongoing

discussing whether the paper has a “translational

efforts that are being made to fund basic, trans-

vector”*; that is, is the research pointed towards a

lational, and clinical science. As always, we welcome

new therapy. As stated in our inaugural issue, JACC:

your thoughts and would like to hear whether you

Basic to Translational Science seeks to serve patients

think that we are pointed in the right direction, either

and families impacted by cardiovascular disease, in-

through

vestigators in academia and industry, the National

([email protected]).

social

media

(#JACCBTS)

or

by

email

Heart, Blood, and Lung Institute and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in an effort to advance

ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE: Dr. Douglas L.

translational cardiovascular medicine (3). Like Beka

Mann, Editor-in-Chief JACC: Basic to Translational

Economopoulos, I marched on April 22nd to ensure

Science, American

that science is pointed in the right direction. What I

House, 2400 North Street NW, Washington, DC 20037.

took away from the 2017 Chicago March for Science

E-mail: [email protected].

College

of

Cardiology,

Heart

REFERENCES 1. Skorton DJ. Why Scientists Should Embrace the Liberal Arts: Science Alone Isn’t Enough to Solve the World’s Problems. January 16, 2014. Scientific American. Available at: https://www. scientificamerican.com/article/why-scientists-should-

2. Yong E. What Exactly Are People Marching for When They March for Science?: The Event Has Around 21 Stated Goals. The Atlantic. May 7, 2017. Available at: https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/ 03/what-exactly-are-people-marching-for-when-

embrace-liberal-arts/. Accessed May 2017.

they-march-for-science/518763/. Accessed May 2017.

*The expression “translation vector” is attributed to Gordon Tomaselli, MD.

3. Mann DL, Annex BH, Bishopric NH, et al. Introducing JACC: Basic to Translational Science: Why now? J Am Coll Cardiol Basic Trans Science 2016;1:1–2.

345