Jan 10, 2009 - Janneke Plantenga, Chantal Remery, Hugo Figueiredo and Mark Smith. Towards a ... Hugo Figueiredo, Manchester Business School, UK.
Nov 30, 2012 - Roadmap towards a Banking Union ... Debate with committee chair and rapporteurs for Banking Union ... sup
Nov 30, 2012 - Decision-making in the European Union and the role of the Parliament. Jack Blackwell, EP official, Press
National Centre of Competence in Research (NCCR). Challenges ..... Finally, protest against EU policy is mostly accompanied by calls for national .... the elites representing these institutional actors are more multilingual and better equipped to.
institutional development of EU-Russia relations from three perspectives: European studies, Russian studies and Internat
Feb 10, 2003 - investment is expected to come from increased export of advanced .... ENCAP. This project has been put forward by major players within.
Mar 23, 2017 - The Treaty of Rome signed 60 years ago initiated the process towards ... internal market after the Single
Nov 20, 2008 - Representative for the Common Foreign and Security Policy have ... density make emergency response manage
Sep 1, 2015 - detailed assessment of each of the ten themes. Evaluation of changes in the sustainable development headli
6 days ago - The Europe 2020 strategy, adopted by the European Council in June 2010, is the European Union's agenda for
Oct 25, 2013 - review of EU trade policy towards developing countries, stressing the GSP. Following .... free trade agreements are not a clear option for some.
Chapter I. International criminal tribunals as new mechanisms of human rights ... 1. Determinants for the establishment of international criminal tribunals .
THE EUROPEAN UNION TOWARDS INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNALS. GENESIS, CONCEPT AND PRACTICE OF COOPERATION
Chapter I. International criminal tribunals as new mechanisms of human rights protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. Determinants for the establishment of international criminal tribunals . . . . 1.1. Human rights abuses during the two world conflicts . . . . . . . . . . 1.2. International humanitarian law violations in the Balkan conflicts in the 90’s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.3. Humanitarian catastrophy in Rwanda and neighbouring states in 1994 . 2. Process of creation of international criminal tribunals . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.1. The UN Security Council’s initiatives concerning the establishment of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia . . . . 2.2. Initiatives of the Security Council to create the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.3. Idea of the establishment of the International Criminal Court within the United Nations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3. Human rights in the competence of international criminal tribunals . . . . . 3.1. Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.2. Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda . . . . . 3.3. Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court . . . . . . . . . . . . Chapter II. Genesis of cooperation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. Human rights in internal functioning of the European Union . . . . 1.1. Human rights question in primary law . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.2. Human rights in institutional regulations . . . . . . . . . . . 2. Human rights in the EU external actions . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.1. Development cooperation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.2. Human rights in association process . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.3. Human rights promotion and protection in accession process . . 3. The EU activities aimed at international criminal tribunals’ creation . 3.1. Initiatives to establish the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.2. Actions aimed at the establishment of the International Tribunal for Rwanda . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.3. Attempts to create the International Criminal Court . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . .
23 26 26
. . . . . .
36 40 43
. .
43
. .
53
. . . .
62 71
. . . . . .
71 75 79
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
92 93 93 100 103 106 119 124 128
. . . . . .
129
. . . . . . . . . . . .
132 135
5
Chapter III. Concept of cooperation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. Character of cooperation with international criminal tribunals . . . . . . . 1.1. Legal basis of cooperation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.2. States as subjects obliged to cooperate with international criminal tribunals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.3. The EU as a cooperation subject . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2. Material scope of cooperation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.1. Collecting and providing evidence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.2. Searching for and surrending of persons accused . . . . . . . . . . . 2.3. Enforcement of judgments of international criminal tribunals . . . . . . 2.4. Financial and technical aid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3. Factors determining the EU cooperation with international criminal tribunals 3.1. Protection of human rights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.2. State and regional reconstruction and national reconciliation . . . . . .
. . . . . .
142 144 144
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
155 161 174 175 180 187 194 198 198 207
Chapter IV. Practice of cooperation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. Direct cooperation with international criminal tribunals . . . . . . . . . 1.1. Direct cooperation with ad hoc tribunals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.2. Direct cooperative activities towards the International Criminal Court 2. Practice of indirect cooperation with international criminal tribunals . . . 2.1. Conditionality as a manifestation of indirect cooperation . . . . . . . 2.2. Objections to initiatives guaranteeing immunities . . . . . . . . . .