The Sealing Ability of New Bioceramic Material

18 downloads 0 Views 667KB Size Report
sealing ability of new bioceramic root repair material TotalFill® with the other perforation repair materials (GIC, MTA and Biodentine) using a dye- extraction ...
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN (Online): 2319-7064 Index Copernicus Value (2015): 78.96 | Impact Factor (2015): 6.391

The Sealing Ability of New Bioceramic Material Used to Repair Furcal Perforation Compared with the Traditional Repair Materials: UV Spectrophotometer Analysis Ala, a Jawad Kadhim1, Nagham A. Al-Hyali2, Raghad Abdulrazzaq Alhashimi3 1

B.D.S., M.Sc., Lecturer, Department of conservative Dentistry, Collage of Dentistry, Baghdad University, Iraq B.D.S., M.Sc., Lecturer, Department of conservative Dentistry, Collage of Dentistry, Baghdad University, Iraq 3 B.D.S., M.Sc., Ph.D., Assistant professor, Department of conservative Dentistry, Collage of Dentistry, Baghdad University, Iraq 2

Abstract: Iatrogenic furcal root perforations are serious complications during dental treatment. This study was aimed to compare the sealing ability of new bioceramic root repair material TotalFill® with the other perforation repair materials (GIC, MTA and Biodentine) using a dye- extraction method.Materials and Methods: Forty extracted, human mandibular molars with non-fused well developed root were collected. Artificial perforations were made from the external surface of the teeth. Then the teeth were randomly divided into 4 experimental groups (n= 10) according to the type of repair material used in this study; Medifil glass ionomercement, TotalFill® bioceramic root repair material, BiodentineTM and MTA Plus. The specimens were then immersed in 4% methylene blue dye up to the CEJ for 48 hours followed by dye extraction with 65% nitric acid for 3 days. The samples were analyzed using ultraviolet (UV) visible spectrophotometer. Data obtained were analyzed using one way ANOVA and Tukey tests at 0.05 significant levels. Results: Statistical analysis showed highly significant differences (P