Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
ScienceDirect Energy Procedia 88 (2016) 827 – 832
CUE2015-Applied Energy Symposium and Summit 2015: Low carbon cities and urban energy systems
The Sliding Mode Control about ASR of Vehicle with Four Independently Driven In-Wheel Motors Based On the Exponent Approach Law Zhifu Wang a,*, Yang Zhoua,b, Guangzhao Leea b
a Collaborative Innovation Center of Electric Vehicles in Beijing,Beijing 100081,China United Automotive Electronic Systems Co.,Ltd.555 Rongqiao Street,Pudong New Area,Shanghai 201206,China
Abstract Acceleration slip regulation control system is a new active safety technology. In this paper, through the research of the four-wheel independent drive electric vehicle, a sliding mode variable structure control algorithm based on exponent approach law is proposed, which is applied to the ASR system. This paper establishes a seven DOFs vehicle dynamics model, tests whether the ASR control strategy is efficient on the poor condition road. The simulation results show that the vehicle acceleration performance improvement rate increases by 43.5% and 58.5% with the control strategy. During the two simulation processes, the results indicate that the sliding mode variable structure control algorithm applied to ASR system has a good adaptation to good and slippery roads. The algorithm can greatly improve the four-wheel independent drive electric vehicle’s acceleration performance. © 2016 by Elsevier Ltd. This an openLtd. access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license © 2015Published The Authors. Published by is Elsevier (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Selection and/or peer-review under responsibility of CUE Peer-review under responsibility of the organizing committee of CUE 2015
Keywords: ASR, sliding mode variable structure control, exponent approach law
1.1. INTRODUCTION The main function of ASR (Acceleration Slip Regulation) is to prevent the driving wheels being in a slip state when the vehicle is in the process of starting or acceleration [1]. At the same time, the lateral adhesion coefficient values should not drop too much compared with the pure rolling state, thus the vehicle can meet the requirement of a turning state [2]. The four-wheel independent drive electric vehicle is a form of distributed drive system [3]. The inwheel motor driven arrangement makes the structure more simplified, because the complicated
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +86-10-68915202; fax: +86-10-68940589. E-mail address:
[email protected].
1876-6102 © 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer-review under responsibility of the organizing committee of CUE 2015 doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2016.06.059
828
Zhifu Wang et al. / Energy Procedia 88 (2016) 827 – 832
mechanical transmission link between the wheel and the power source is dismissed. Thus, not only the energy efficiency is greatly improved, but also the whole vehicle vibration and noise are greatly reduced [4]. Except the advantages above, the four-wheel independent drive is easily to make the electric control chassis reality, leading the dynamic control simple [5,6]. During the past years, the intelligent algorithms have developed rapidly [7]. The sliding mode variable structure control, one of the intelligent algorithms obtains quick application because of its good robustness [8]. Compared with other algorithms, the sliding mode algorithm essentially is a kind of nonlinear control and its biggest characteristic is discontinuity of control. In the process of dynamic, on the basis of the current state of the system, the algorithm changes the inputs to get the system follow the trajectory of the sliding mode state. According to many experiments past, the sliding mode control can be designed and validated to meet the control requirements. The coefficients of algorithm has nothing to do with the system parameters and the system noise, so the sliding mode variable structure control algorithm has a good robustness [9,10]. 2. SEVEN FREEDOM DEGREES VEHICLE MODEL AND ASR CONTROL STRATEGY 2.1. The establishment of the seven freedom degrees vehicle dynamic model The seven freedom degrees vehicle dynamic model takes of the coordinate system of the vehicle, including the vehicle's longitudinal movement, the lateral movement, the yaw movement and the fourwheel rotations [11]. As shown in Fig. 1, four motors are installed in the wheel hubs. The pitch, the roll and the vertical motion of the vehicle are ignored in the model. The differential equation of the longitudinal motion: max m(vx vy r ) ( Fx1 Fx 2 )cos G Fx 3 Fx 4 (Fy1 Fy 2 )sin G (1) The differential equation of the lateral motion: may
m(vy vx r ) ( Fx1 Fx 2 )sin G Fy 3 Fy 4 (Fy1 Fy 2 )cos G
(2)
The differential equation of the yaw motion: Izr
Aa ( Fy 3 Fy 4 )b B
D 2
(3)
In the equations˖ A ( Fx1 Fx 2 )sin G ( Fy1 Fy 2 )cos G B ( Fx 2 Fx1 )cos G ( Fy1 Fy 2 )sin G ( Fx 4 Fx3 ) Y
Fy 3
Fx 3
Fy1
a
b
Fx1
D1
G1
Motor vy
X
E
B
vx r
Fy 4
Motor Fx 4
Motor Fy 2
Fx 2
D2
G2
829
Zhifu Wang et al. / Energy Procedia 88 (2016) 827 – 832
Fig. 1 . Seven freedom degrees vehicle dynamic model
2.2. The establish of vehicle model The whole simulation are divided into two parts and the selected road condition is joint road. The validity of the sliding mode variable structure control strategy is verified through the simulation below. The vehicle model parameters are shown in Table1: Table 1. Basic parameters of the vehicle Parameters Gross mass Wheelbase(front,rear) Track width(front,rear) Centroid height Yaw moment of inertia. Initial slip rate
Symbols m (lf,lr) (df,dr) h Iz
O
Units kg m m m kg*m2 --
Values 1704 (1.235,1.455) (1.535,1.535) 0.45 3048 0.01
Simulation process is as follows. The initial velocity of vehicle was 5m/s in high adhesion road. The maximum adhesion coefficient of the ground is 0.9. After 1s, the vehicle arrives into the slippery road surface, and its maximum adhesion coefficient is 0.2. The total simulation time is 5s. The simulation experiments with and without control strategy are carried out. The simulation model are established based on the magic formula tire model which is more precise in order to make the simulation more accurate and getting more close to the real car test data. According to the differential equation of the vehicle model and magic tire model, the vehicle ASR control model is gotted in the simulition. 2.3. The post-processing of simulation results In the simulink environment, the first simulation does not exert the control strategy, so each wheel goes with the initial driving moment. The scopes of simulink can display the vehicle front and rear wheels’ slip ratio, velocity and the driving moment of each wheel. The second simulation is carried on with the drive torque control strategy. The simulation results are shown in Fig. 2, 3 and 4.
Fig. 2. Slip rate changing with time
2.4. The simulation results analysis
Fig.3 . Speed changing with time
Fig.4. Front and rear torque changing over time
830
Zhifu Wang et al. / Energy Procedia 88 (2016) 827 – 832
Figure 2 shows the vehicle’s changes of the wheel slip rates with the application of sliding mode variable structure control strategy, along the joint road during acceleration. For the first simulation, the vehicle runs without control. In 0~1s, the ground condition is good, during this period, the wheel’s slip rates are in a low range, and fails to maximize the use of ground adhesion. So the acceleration performance of the vehicle does not get the best state. After 1s, vehicle arrives into the slippery road, while the driving moment of the vehicle does not change. So the wheel’s slip rates grow fast. The acceleration performance of the vehicle is not good enough. For the second simulation, the vehicle is attached to the sliding mode variable structure control algorithm. In the process of 0~1s, the slip rate is in low position of the slip ratio range beyond the best value. Therefore, by changing the driving moment of each wheel, the vehicle can make good use of the ground maximum adhesion, improving the speed of the vehicle. After the vehicle into the slippery road surface, reduce the driving moment to prevent the excessive wheel slip rates. Figure 3 represents the vehicle's velocity changes over time before and after using sliding mode variable structure control algorithm. By contrast, in the time of 0~1s and 1~5s, the vehicle velocity with control strategy is greater than that not exerts control strategy. This conclusion shows that the sliding mode variable structure control strategy has a good robustness for the good pavement with high adhesion coefficient and wet pavement with low adhesion coefficient. Define the vehicle acceleration performance optimization rate as follows: K
v ye vno
(4)
vno v0
In the formula: K means vehicle acceleration performance optimization rate; v ye , the final speed with control strategy; vno , the final speed without control strategy; v0 , the initial speed of the vehicle;
The vehicle velocity of the simulation is shown in Table 2. Table 2. The changes of vehicle velocity along with time t/(s)
1.000
5.000
vno/(m/s)
9.069
14.300
vye/(m/s)
10.840
19.140
During 0~1s, K1 43.5% and during 1~5s, K2 58.7% . The vehicle front and rear wheels’ drive torque changes over time in the two simulations are shown in Fig. 4. It is not hard to find, after using the control strategy, the vehicle in good pavement can appropriately increases the driving moment of each wheel, make full use of the adhesion ability of road. So the vehicle achieves better acceleration performance. On the wet pavement, the algorithm can decrease the wheel driving moment to prevent excessive wheel slip. 3. CONCLUSION Aiming at the vehicle ASR control system, this paper takes the sliding mode variable structure control algorithm with exponential reaching rate. Then the paper conducts a seven freedom degrees vehicle dynamic model. Finally the paper carries on the quantitative analysis to the simulation results. Results
Zhifu Wang et al. / Energy Procedia 88 (2016) 827 – 832
show that without control algorithm, the vehicle in good road will not be able to make full use of the ground adhesion; while on the slippery road surface, due to the driving moment is too big, the tire’s slip rates are seriously beyond effective value. In both cases, the vehicle’s acceleration performance is poor. During the second simulation with sliding mode variable structure control algorithm, whether the adhesion of the road is high or low, the vehicle is able to achieve a better acceleration performance. The algorithm maximizes the use of tire-road friction coefficient and the wheel slip rates are controlled in a certain range. Through quantitative calculation, the driving performance of the two acceleration period improves by 43.5% and 58.5% . The results indicate that the sliding mode variable structure control algorithm in ASR system is effective and has a good robustness. Acknowledgement The research work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation (51105032), Research Fund of Key Laboratory of Automotive Engineering of Sichuan Province (SZJJ2012-037). Reference [1] Du Z, Chen H,” Real vehicle drive test of four-wheel independent drive electric vehicle”, Automobile industry college journal of hubei province[J], 2008, 22(1):1-6. [2] He H, Peng J, Xiong R, et al. An Acceleration Slip Regulation Strategy for Four-Wheel Drive Electric Vehicles Based on Sliding Mode Control[J]. Energies, 2014, 7(6):3748-3763. [3] Zheng L, Ye J. Analysis of the Lateral Stability for Four-wheel Independent Driving Electric Vehicles[J]. Applied Mechanics & Materials, 2014, 590:394-398. [4] Fujimoto H, Tsumasaka A, Noguchi T. Vehicle Stability Control of Small Electric Vehicle on Snowy Road[J]. Jsae Review of Automotive Engineers, 2006, 27:279-286. [5] Sakai S I, Sado H, Hori Y. Motion control in an electric vehicle with four independently driven in-wheel motors[J]. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 1999, 4(1):9-16. [6] Farzad Tahami, Shahrokh Farhangi, Reza Kazemi. A fuzzy logic direct yaw-moment control system for all-wheel-drive electric vehicles[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2004, 41(3):203-221. [7] Yang P, Xiong L, Yu Z. Motor / Hydraulic Systems Combined Control Strategy for Four In-wheel Motor Driven Electric Vehicle[J]. Automotive Engineering, 2013, 35(10):921-926. [8] Huang X, Wang J, Huang X, et al. Robust Sideslip Angle Estimation for Lightweight Vehicles Using Smooth Variable Structure Filter[J]. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2013(1):V003T41A001. [9] Zhang X, Xu Y, Pan M, et al. A vehicle ABS adaptive sliding-mode control algorithm based on the vehicle velocity estimation and tyre/road friction coefficient estimations[J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2014, 52(4):475-503. [10] Lin C, Cheng X. A sliding mode control strategy for a distributed driving electric vehicle[C]// Transportation Electrification Asia-Pacific (ITEC Asia-Pacific), 2014 IEEE Conference and Expo. IEEE, 2014. [11] Liu W, He H, Peng J. Driving Control Research for Longitudinal Dynamics of Electric Vehicles with Independently Driven Front and Rear Wheels[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2013, 2013(2):1-17.
831
832
Zhifu Wang et al. / Energy Procedia 88 (2016) 827 – 832
Biography Zhifu Wang received the M.E. degree and the Ph.D. degree from the Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China, in 2003 and 2013, both in vehicle engineering. He is currently an Associate Professor with the National Engineering Laboratory for Electric Vehicles, Beijing Institute of Technology.