Universal Development of Emotion Categories in Natural Language

4 downloads 643 Views 3MB Size Report
was to explore whether the sequence of naming emotion categories was uniform .... There is no empirical support for the extreme version of his hypothesis (E.
Copyright 1999 by the American Psychological Association, Inc. 0022-3514/99/S3.00

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1999, Vol. 77, No. 2, 247-278

Universal Development of Emotion Categories in Natural Language Ralph B. Hupka, Alison P. Lenton, and Keith A. Hutchison California State University, Long Beach P. Shaver, J. Schwartz, D. Kirson, and C. O'Connor (1987) found that English emotion words fall into 25 categories of synonyms. To find emotion nomenclature universals, the authors used P. Shaver et al.'s taxonomy in a sample of the world's languages and found that emotion categories were added in most languages in a relatively similar generalized sequence. Labeled first were the categories of anger and guilt; followed in Stage 2 by adoration, alarm, amusement, and depression; in Stage 3 by alienation, arousal, and agony; and ending with eagerness in Stage 4. The remaining 5 stages were derivatives of Stages 1—4. Thus, in the folk taxonomy, Stages 1-4 are basic linguistic emotion categories. Motives for labeling emotions were driven possibly by the need to maintain social control, the identification of prototypical emotions elicited in interpersonal relationships, and the need for terms to identify intrapersonal emotions. Features of markedness theory were corroborated for English emotion terms.

with the list created by Murdock (1945), which later was expanded by Tiger and Fox (1971), Hockett (1973), and D. E. Brown (1991). The search for cross-cultural similarities flourished in anthropology, linguistics, and psychology. Universals have been demonstrated in natural language in semantics (Herrmann & Raybeck, 1981; Ullman, 1963); connotative or affective meaning (Osgood, 1964; Osgood, May, & Miron, 1975); phonology, grammar, lexicon, and kinship terminology (Greenberg, 1966); sibling terminology (Kronenfeld, 1974; Nerlove .

c

o


isgust

izeme e

" - '

ra O oo ra ra O o > t oo g E fl II

e

r->

TO

§

epn ision = r anno ses.

DO

usias

=

It II

ition

>

iisa

G3

1!

ral

II

00

im tat:ion

td

surprise

fifi

ide



eli

&

60

UI.I

c

II u

f

I_ « Ed

E

G

o

"60 CD

11

Agony

Arousal

c

cf

CD

C^l

II

•^

•5 o

y >

c

o

II

II CD

" CD

liversal enc usage l ado:ration (1 ent excitem Trujitration

alienation

J3

3 en cs CD

sei
%

CO

o

So o

£ c

y

•5

o

00
jQ-

.22 g

8 I" I?-;



-r-

§"«§

^

o••?e™ 3

M

ltl tli

I3

re ^ C5 0 0

S Jri S iS

j = S os

•c

00

ZQ

^: ox)

-t ^

•S §

Y ^ fTl

IS

[T,

e » •°"'-S *S £ 3 v W Q W

bO

c

•c

•a e

ll If Ill'i

°l

*3 "t3

2 ^ * _ g'

^

a r

2

SI

8-a

I S 2S



1

S

£

«a S

8

1

r""

»*.

2 .£>

g

j? >, J&.2..2

Ilifis

3

gf

if

N > OM MO

H| a *

*3

Hi I! I *

O

liiigg.

ill

-

K^1 DHH

I •3=3 a

III

1

-

E

'sip

"5 us

•c -c

II

i

1111

•s

3 8 A JS

u^2

I

Q^T

«.

=5

U05

2 ;=

1

111 I

•i&i

"1 s McS

Is |1 «^'

2?

'3 •§ -g-5.

PS»ja:t2

lie!

&s J If

2KO

-5 .y 2 g-Bi

I 2 I •- g

S S ii •

13 .o-g gjc

* is i ra



Si •51 a i t

I

- 5

£> rt

"O

«

< S

x> n M >o* ^*

S3

,3 S

s

o

£

tfl

%

•S3

— x

•c

e

o

'5

8S

B S •=

t

a>1 Sl£

.—

&0

_O *c3

£.

'S a* •a o,

R

= !•„ 1=3 B •£ S ^

B O 5

'•3 S S B -a 2 §>.!

sal

fa sz^

5 -°

:

s

SJls

ra S

&

Z ZQ

fit

n

00

i 3 o 3 =

,£»

a. be Q

3 :=-1

U 1

• - (U 3

•" DO

•£-S% 'ra" § S

S'QQ

g a'

•o

111 I a,

1 « DO



1

ll

ra

s^

III

« 3 3 00 tT C 3Ort

l1

.s 1

• "

S

B

£

3 a. « •E..2, j S-J? .s-g.3 » •> S*'S 5 .IS » 5: ^"O •£ -a T: "O "ra S S :£o OH >£X

O

o

Q-

rt

8-

»-l .

o -

B a c 3 -5o

3

ZO

fij

|1=

M1 H. S

^o

S.s 1

T3

1 /ra O

a 3 fflJ O

0 _ C 2

ndoi

* IIII 1

|

5

:(L)

i

•3. Si "&

« «S

I 1

moz

3 rt S pi &o 2 o £

oSz

3 •§ " ^

•s 1 l a .

fo

,81

O

N N

ra

£>

«

•-

|I

•-

& ra

&8

O

ill

is

3 Srs

5

S

1 g

1

ra




DO

aj

II

Hi

111 sal

'3\2S

III

S- 2

am z

ra

S untent -shipa: onit-th pleasi

yam ntuts

Tsuva:

ariy

1,1

1 I1 1

S X c-

g £ s

2g,

Ele: to desire

y

"3

.8

J O

3 £ .&!•

£ S

5S

GaeArez Maq:

ia ft tole Ueligui

item] (A)vy':

opiii

gitok

Tevred Isoken

itenc iwol Cilili i: sadi Smh mm

Jhili Rung unge:

stalli iillas

l< l< £

3

s

uch

|| | 1 ^

2a 2 S

oore re CQ O

UlgOSUI

: shar

^2

|

•£3

're

"^

'E? re

=S



shni vu as: be j

3

;S.* S

- •

ill

rekose

regrei

11 1

_I 1 "~ ^ .H 3 S "« j_, Jg >_ rj

4) 'cj, ' u

2J i

< < CO

O

S 13 ^

l

I2 I

O O C

u

0>

*1

11

§ 11

3 u iS •

B 2. "

la

ii

I

I u *3

I

ex

Suggest Documents