Warwickshire Indices of Multiple Deprivation 2010

Warwickshire Indices of Multiple Deprivation 2010

August 2011

Warwickshire

Observatory

Indices of Multiple Deprivation 2010 Report

Disclaimer This report has been prepared by the Warwickshire Observatory, Warwickshire County Council, with all reasonable skill, care, and diligence. We accept no responsibility of whatsoever nature to any third parties to whom this report, or any part thereof, is made known. Any such party relies on the report at their own risk. Copyright Statement The copyright for this publication rests with Warwickshire County Council. The report includes Crown copyright and OS copyright information, used with permission. Any material that is reproduced from this report must be quoted accurately and not used in a misleading context. The copyright must be acknowledged and the title of the publication specified. Publication date: August 2011 Contact: Kate McGrory Telephone: 01926 412775 Email: [email protected]

Title Page The graphic on the title page illustrates the communities that are the top ten most deprived in Warwickshire for each aspect of deprivation, as measured in the Indices of Deprivation 2010.

www.warwickshireobservatory.org

‐ 1 ‐


•

Introduction The new English Indices of Deprivation 2010 (IMD 2010) have recently been released by the Department for Communities and Local Government. These replace the Indices of Deprivation 2007 (IMD 2007) as the official measure of deprivation in England. The IMD 2010 provides a relative ranking of areas across England according to their level of deprivation. The IMD 2010 includes the following measures of deprivation: •

The Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD 2010) as described below;

•

Local Authority District Summaries of the IMD 2010

•

Income Deprivation Affecting Children Index 2010

•

Income Deprivation Affecting Older People Index 2010

The new IMD 2010 is a nationally recognised measure of deprivation at Lower Layer Super‐Output Area level (SOA). SOAs have an approximate population of 1,500 people and allow the identification of small pockets of deprivation. There are 333 SOAs in Warwickshire. The IMD 2010 comprises seven domain indices representing the following different aspects of deprivation. •

•

Income deprivation o Income Deprivation affecting Children o Income Deprivation affecting Older People Employment deprivation

•

Health deprivation and disability

•

Education, skills and training deprivation o Children/Young People o Skills

•

•

Barriers to housing and services o Wider Barriers (e.g. homelessness, access to owner occupation) o Geographical Barriers (e.g. road distance to key services) Living environment deprivation o Indoor Environment (e.g. poor quality housing) o Outdoor Environment (e.g. air quality) Crime

These different dimensions of deprivation are weighted and combined to create the overall IMD 2010. The weightings given to each domain in the overall index varies. For example, income and employment deprivation influences the overall index score far greater than the crime or living environment domains. The weightings and component indicators for each domain have been detailed in the Appendix. The IMD 2010 ranks all areas in England based upon their scores generated from a number of different indicators for the various types of deprivation detailed above. A low rank denotes greater deprivation. A ranking of 1 represents the most deprived area and a ranking of 32,482 represents the least deprived area nationally. The ranks allow direct comparison between other areas across the whole of England. The Indices of Deprivation were created as a measure of relative deprivation rather than absolute deprivation, therefore it cannot be used to determine ‘how much’ more deprived one SOA is than another. For example, it is not possible to say that SOA X, ranked 20th, is twice as deprived as SOA Y, which is ranked 40th. However, it is possible to say that X is more deprived than Y. The IMD 2010 is based on the approach, structure and methodology that were used to create the previous IMD 2007. The Department for Communities & Local Government have advised that it is possible to compare


‐ 2 ‐


the two indices. However, although the update is branded as the 2010 Indices, much of the data used to construct it is taken from 2008. This has implications for how we should interpret the information. Any significant improvements we have made to relative deprivation levels in specific localities in the past two or three years will not be reflected in the latest version of the Indices.

Key Messages Nuneaton & Bedworth has the highest levels of deprivation in the County, indicated by the highest average SOA score. The Borough ranks as the 108th most deprived Local Authority District (out of the 326 Local Authorities in England). Nuneaton and Bedworth falls within the top third most deprived Local Authority Districts in England. Stratford‐on‐Avon District is the least deprived in Warwickshire with a national rank of 278th. Table 1: Indices of Deprivation 2007 & 2010 ‐ Comparison of Relative Rankings Rank of Average Score

Rank of Average Rank

Rank of Extent

Rank of Local Concentration

North Warwickshire

‐3

‐9

7

4

Nuneaton & Bedworth

‐4

‐8

‐3

23

Rugby

4

0

17

12

2

8

‐10

0

‐17

‐19

‐5

‐7

Name

Stratford‐on‐Avon Warwick

Change in Rankings: Relatively More Deprived (Deterioration in Rankings) Relatively Less Deprived (Improvement in Rankings) Source: English Indices of Deprivation, Department for Communities & Local Government.

In terms of relative positions in the national rankings, Table 1 suggests that relative to other English Local Authority Districts, Rugby Borough is more deprived in the latest IMD 2010 than it was in the 2007 Index across three of the four summary measures. Nuneaton & Bedworth Borough’s relative deprivation rankings have improved in three out of four measures in 2010 by 3 to 8 places. Warwick


‐ 3 ‐


District has seen a marked improvement in its rankings and the District is relatively less deprived than it was in the IMD 2007 across all four of the summary measures. There are nine SOAs in Warwickshire ranked within the top 10% most deprived SOAs nationally on the overall Index of Multiple Deprivation 2010. These are all located within Nuneaton & Bedworth Borough. This compares with six SOAs in IMD 2007 and two SOAs in IMD 2004. Figure 1 details the location of Warwickshire’s most deprived areas according to the IMD 2010. These are concentrated in central and north west Nuneaton.

Figure 1: Super‐Output Areas (SOAs) in Warwickshire ranked in the Top 10% Most Deprived SOAs nationally on the IMD 2010 (Ranks are shown in brackets)

Note: A ranking of 1 represents the most deprived SOA in England and a ranking of 32,482 represents the least deprived. Source: English Indices of Deprivation 2010, Communities & Local Government.


‐ 4 ‐


It is interesting to note that the top 13 most deprived SOAs on the IMD 2007 have all moved up the national rankings and are therefore ranked as being relatively more deprived on the IMD 2010. This is shown in Table 2. Some 22 of Warwickshire’s most deprived 30 SOAs have similarly deteriorated in a national context. Table 2: Indices of Deprivation 2007 & 2010 ‐ Comparison of Relative Rankings of Warwickshire’s Most Deprived Areas Super Output Area

District

IMD 2007 Rank

IMD 2010 Rank

Change in National Ranks 2007‐2010

Bar Pool North & Crescents

Nun & Bed

1,087

492

↑ 595

Camp Hill Village Centre

Nun & Bed

1,598

557

↑ 1,041

Abbey Town Centre

Nun & Bed

1,780

1,478

↑ 302

Middlemarch & Swimming Pool

Nun & Bed

2,571

1,689

↑ 882

Kingswood Grove Farm & Rural

Nun & Bed

2,958

1,335

↑ 1,623

Abbey Priory

Nun & Bed

2,974

2,648

↑ 326

Camp Hill South West & Brook

Nun & Bed

3,623

2,607

↑ 1,016

Hill Top

Nun & Bed

3,733

2,672

↑ 1,061

Riversley

Nun & Bed

4,845

4,031

↑ 814

Bede East

Nun & Bed

4,859

3,539

↑ 1,320

Atherstone Central ‐ Centre

North Warks

4,982

4,866

↑ 116

Camp Hill West & Quarry

Nun & Bed

5,173

3,101

↑ 2,072

Brownsover South Lake District North

Rugby

5,205

3,314

↑ 1,891

Key:

Top 10% Most Deprived SOAs nationally Top 10‐20% Most Deprived SOAs nationally

Source: English Indices of Deprivation, Department for Communities & Local Government

The reason for this apparent decline is not clear. It could be that deprivation levels in the County have remained static in a generally improving national

context, or it could be that there has been real absolute decline in some of our neighbourhoods. The fact that the average IMD deprivation score has increased between 2007 and 2010 implies that the latter of these two options is most likely. Table 3: Warwickshire's most deprived SOAs nationally (out of 333 SOAs)

Top 10% 2007

Overall IMD

6

Income Employment

Top 20%

Top 30%

2010 2007 2010 2007 2010 9

16

21

39

43

3

6

17

19

40

43

9

15

17

25

43

55

Health

6

8

17

21

41

43

Education, skills & training

17

25

41

45

79

81

Barriers to housing and services

35

29

67

52

97

63

Crime

13

20

36

42

57

63

Living Environment

1

1

9

10

22

23


Figures 2 and 3 below, illustrate the geographical pattern of deprivation across the County using the latest results from the IMD 2010. Figure 2 shows each SOA’s national IMD 2010 ranking and the second indicates whether each SOA has moved up or down the national rankings since the 2007 index. Readers should not get distracted by the larger, rural, SOAs as many of the key issues are located within the smaller urban areas – each SOA contains approximately the same population. Figure 2 clearly identifies clusters of the most deprived communities in west Nuneaton and smaller parts of Warwickshire’s other large towns. Figure 3 is perhaps more interesting, illustrating that all parts of the County have some neighbourhoods that have, in a national context, become relatively more deprived. The most deprived SOA in the County is the Bar Pool North and


‐ 5 ‐

Indices of Multiple Deprivation 2010 Report Figure 2: IMD 2010 Rankings

Figure 3: Change in Rankings 2007‐2010


‐ 6 ‐


Crescents in Nuneaton. This area is ranked 492nd out of the 32,482 SOAs in England on the overall Index of Multiple Deprivation, placing it within the top 2% most deprived SOAs nationally. In terms of multiple deprivation, there are a number of areas which feature within the top 10% most deprived areas nationally in a number of different domains. Bar Pool North and Crescents, Camp Hill Village Centre and Kingswood Grove Farm and Rural in Nuneaton feature in the top 10% most deprived areas in five out of the seven domains. These areas experience multiple‐domain deprivation associated with income, employment, health, education, and crime. In addition to this, Abbey Town Centre and Priory and Hill Top in Wem Brook ward show up within the top 10% most deprived SOAs nationally in four out of the seven different domains, whilst Middlemarch & Swimming Pool SOA and Bede East SOA feature in three. In Warwickshire, the main priorities in terms of type of deprivation lie in the barriers to housing and services, education and crime domains. The barriers to housing and services domain focuses on geographical access to key local services and issues relating to access to housing, such as affordability. Within Warwickshire, 57 (or 17%) of SOAs are ranked within the top 20% most deprived SOAs in England on this measure. This compares with 67 areas (or 20%) in the 2007 Indices. There are three SOAs in Warwickshire ranked within the 1% most deprived SOAs nationally. One located in Stoneleigh in Warwick District and two in Stratford‐on‐Avon District (Ladbroke and Priors SOA in Fenny Compton ward and Long Compton SOA in Long Compton ward). A total of 45 areas in Warwickshire are ranked in the top 20% most educationally deprived areas nationally compared with 41 in IMD 2007. The

most deprived six SOAs are in Nuneaton & Bedworth Borough, all falling within the top 1,000 most deprived areas in England. Camp Hill Village Centre fares particularly poorly in this respect and is ranked as the 175th most deprived area in England. However, it has improved by 50 places from 125th most deprived in the IMD 2007. The crime domain measures the rate of recorded crime for the four major crime types of burglary, theft, criminal damage and violence, and represents the risk of personal and material victimisation at a small area level. There are 20 SOAs in Warwickshire ranked within the top 10%, and 42 within the top 20% most deprived SOAs nationally on this domain. This has increased from ten in the top 10% and 36 in the top 20% in the IMD 2007. The most deprived area in the County on this measure is Abbey Priory in Nuneaton which is ranked 431st nationally, deteriorating from the IMD 2007 by 473 places.


‐ 7 ‐


Local Authority District Results

Although a significant benefit of the IMD 2010 is that it is produced at Super Output Area (SOA) level, allowing us to highlight localised pockets of deprivation, Local Authority District level summary measures of the IMD 2010 have also been produced. The Department for Communities and Local Government advise that no single summary measure should be favoured over another and therefore there is no single best way of describing or comparing England’s 326 local authority districts. The summary measures are: •

Average of SOA Scores is the population weighted average of the combined scores for the SOAs in a local authority district.

•

Average of SOA Ranks is the population weighted average of the combined ranks for the SOAs in a local authority district.

•

Extent is the proportion of a local authority district’s population living in the most deprived SOAs in the country.

•

Local Concentration is the population weighted average of the ranks of a district’s most deprived SOAs that contain exactly 10% of the local authority district’s population.

Table 4: Indices of Deprivation 2010 – Local Authority District Rankings Rank of Rank of Rank of Rank of Local Average Average Name Extent Concentration SOA Score Rank North Warwickshire 182 172 198 198 Nuneaton & Bedworth 108 115 106 76 Rugby 219 225 194 194 Stratford‐on‐Avon 278 271 294 303 Warwick 257 260 237 238 District Rankings: 1 = most deprived, 326 = least deprived Source: English Indices of Deprivation, Department for Communities & Local Government

Table 4 details changes in the relative rankings of the Districts between the IMD 2007 and IMD 2010 for the four different summary measures of deprivation. Of these summary measures, the rank of the average SOA score for each local authority is most easily interpreted. Nuneaton and Bedworth Borough has the highest levels of deprivation in the County, indicated by the highest average SOA score. The Borough ranks as the 108th most deprived Local Authority District (out of the 326 Local Authorities in England). Nuneaton and Bedworth Borough falls within the top third most deprived Local Authority Districts in England. Stratford‐on‐Avon District is the least deprived in Warwickshire with a national rank of 278th. The most significant deterioration has occurred in Rugby Borough, whilst Warwick District has seen a marked improvement in its rankings.


‐ 8 ‐

Indices of Multiple Deprivation 2010 Report Table 5: Indices of Deprivation 2007 & 2010 ‐ Comparison of Relative Rankings of Warwickshire Districts/Boroughs Rank of Rank of Rank of Rank of Local Name Average Average Extent Concentration Score Rank North Warwickshire Nuneaton & Bedworth Rugby Stratford‐on‐Avon Warwick

‐3 ‐4 4 2 ‐17

‐9 ‐8 0 8 ‐19

7 ‐3 17 ‐10 ‐5

4 23 12 0 ‐7

District Rankings: 1 = most deprived, 326 = least deprived Change in Rankings: Relatively More Deprived (Deterioration in Rankings) Relatively Less Deprived (Improvement in Rankings)

Source: English Indices of Deprivation, Department for Communities & Local Government. Note: IMD 2007 was conducted on pre‐2009 local authorities. Hence, ranks were adjusted accordingly to allow for comparison with the IMD 2010.

The local authorities can also be summarised using a local concentration score, which identifies authorities containing ‘hotspots’ of extreme deprivation using a population weighted average of the ranks of a District’s most deprived SOAs that contain exactly 10% of the District’s population. In this measure, there has been a relative deterioration in three out of five Districts/Boroughs in terms of rank. In particular, Nuneaton and Bedworth Borough has slipped 23 places from the 2007 index. This summary measure suggests that the gaps in deprivation across Warwickshire are widening and whilst some areas, particularly in Warwick District appear to have shown notable improvement, there are ‘hotspots’ in the north of the County that have shown marked deterioration.

District Analysis: Super Output Area Results North Warwickshire Borough IMD 2010: As shown in Table 6, there are three SOAs ranked within the top 30% most deprived SOAs nationally in the IMD 2010, one more than in the previous IMD 2007 index. The most deprived SOA in North Warwickshire, Atherstone Central Centre, has risen slightly up the rankings, remaining in the top 10‐20% most deprived SOAs in England. Mancetter South and Ridge Lane SOA has also risen up the rankings by over 500 places from the top 20‐ 30% to the top 10‐20%. Atherstone North – St Georges and Carlyon SOA now features in the top 30% most deprived SOAs nationally, rising 1,712 places nationally since IMD 2007. Table 6: North Warwickshire SOAs featuring in the top 30% most deprived SOAs nationally Change IMD 2007 IMD 2010 Super Output Area Ward in Rank Rank Ranks Atherstone Central ‐ Centre

Atherstone Central

4,982 (11)

4,866 (15)

↑116

Mancetter South and Ridge Lane

Atherstone South & 6,805 (18) Mancetter

6,294 (20)

↑511

Atherstone North ‐ St. Georges and Carlyon

Atherstone North

8,137 (30)

↑1,712

9,849 (40)

*numbers in brackets are the SOAs ranked within Warwickshire 1 to 333 Source: English Indices of Deprivation, Department for Communities & Local Government

Income Deprivation Domain: As was the situation in the IMD 2007, three SOAs feature in the top 30% most income deprived SOAs nationally in the IMD 2010, however, the third SOA has changed between the rankings. New


‐ 9 ‐


Arley East, Hill Top and Ansley SOA is not longer in the top 30% most income deprived SOAs nationally and has been replaced by Atherstone North – St. Georges and Carlyon SOA in the 2010 index. Employment Deprivation Domain: Seven SOAs in North Warwickshire feature within the top 30% most employment deprived SOAs nationally compared to four SOAs in the IMD 2007. Two of the SOAs in the top 30% most employment deprived (Mancetter South and Ridge Lane SOA and Polesworth East – St. Helena SOA) have both risen by over 3,000 places nationally since the 2007 index. Education, Skills, and Training Deprivation Domain: 13 SOAs are ranked within the top 30% most deprived SOAs nationally in terms of educational attainment compared to 14 in the IMD 2007. There continue to be four in the top 10%, with six in the top 10‐20% compared to five in the IMD 2007 (Baddesley Ensor West has risen from the top 20‐30% into the top 10‐20%). Health and Disability Deprivation Domain: Three SOAs feature within the top 30% most health deprived SOAs nationally compared to four in the IMD 2007. Atherstone Central Centre remains the only North Warwickshire SOA in the top 10‐20% most health deprived SOAs nationally although it has seen a rise in its relative deprivation between the two indices. Barriers to Housing and Services Domain: A total of ten SOAs are ranked within the top 30% most deprived SOAs nationally on this measure, of which three feature in the top 10% and three in the top 10‐20%. This compares to 13 SOAs featuring in the top 30% in the IMD 2007, five of which were in the top 10% and two in the top 10‐20%. Of the ten SOAs within the 30% most deprived SOAs in England in terms of barriers to housing and services

deprivation, only two have seen a relative deterioration in their ranking since the 2007 index. Crime Domain: There are three SOAs in North Warwickshire that feature within the top 30% most crime deprived SOAs nationally, this compares to no SOAs in the 2007 index. The top 10 most deprived SOAs in Warwickshire in terms of crime have all seen deterioration in their rankings since IMD 2007. Living Environment: One SOA is ranked within the top 30% most deprived SOAs nationally on the living environment domain. The SOA in Fillongley has remained in the top 30% most deprived since the 2007 index but has risen up the rankings by over 500 places. Table 7: North Warwickshire's most deprived SOAs nationally (out of 38 SOAs) Top 10% Top 20% Top 30%

2007

2010 2007 2010 2007 2010

Overall IMD

0

0

1

2

2

3

Income

0

0

2

2

3

3

Employment

1

1

1

3

4

7

Health

0

0

1

1

4

3


4

4

9

10

14

13


5

3

7

6

13

10

Crime

0

0

0

1

0

3

Living Environment

0

0

0

0

1

1



‐ 10 ‐

Indices of Multiple Deprivation 2010 Report Figure 4: Index of Multiple Deprivation ‐ North Warwickshire

Nuneaton & Bedworth Borough

IMD 2010: A total of 29 SOAs feature in the top 30% most deprived SOAs nationally, including nine in the top 10% and seven in the top 10‐20%, compared to 28 in the top 30% most deprived SOAs in the IMD 2007, when six SOAs were in the top 10% and seven were in the top 10‐20%. The six SOAs in the top 10% most deprived SOAs in England in the IMD 2007, remain in the top 10% in the IMD 2010, rising up the deprivation rankings further. These six SOAs are joined by another three SOAs moving up the rankings into the top 10% from within the 10‐20% in the IMD 2007. Income Deprivation Domain: There are six SOAs in the top 10% most income deprived SOAs in the IMD 2010 compared to three in the IMD 2007. The top seven most income deprived SOAs deteriorated further relative to other areas in England with three SOAs rising up the national rankings by over 1,000 places. The number of SOAs ranked in the top 30% most income deprived in England rose from 21 in the IMD 2007 to 26 in the IMD 2010.

Employment Deprivation Domain: In the IMD 2010, there are 32 SOAs in the top 30% most employment deprived SOAs in England, including 11 in the top 10%, compared to 28 in the top 30% and seven in the top 10% most employment deprived SOAs nationally in the IMD 2007. The most deprived SOA on this domain, Abbey Town Centre, fell 214 places down the deprivation rankings to a rank of 635 (out of 32,482 SOAs in England). Also, three of the five Wem Brook SOAs feature in the top 10%.



‐ 11 ‐

Indices of Multiple Deprivation 2010 Report Table 8: Nuneaton & Bedworth Borough SOAs featuring in the top 30% most deprived nationally *numbers in brackets are the SOAs ranked within Warwickshire 1 to 333 Super Output Area

Ward

IMD 2007 Rank

IMD 2010 Rank

Change in Ranks


Bar Pool

1,087 (1)

492 (1)

↑595


Camp Hill

1,598 (2)

557 (2)

↑1,041


Kingswood

2,958 (5)

1335 (3)

↑1,623

Abbey

1,780 (3)

1478 (4)

↑302


Wem Brook

2,571 (4)

1689 (5)

↑882


Camp Hill

3,623 (7)

2607 (6)

↑1,016

Abbey

2,974 (6)

2648 (7)

↑326

Wem Brook

3,733 (8)

2672 (8)

↑1,061

Abbey Town Centre

Abbey Priory Hill Top Camp Hill West & Quarry

Camp Hill

5,173 (12)

3101 (9)

↑2,072

Bede East

Bede

4,859 (10)

3539 (11)

↑1,320

Riversley

Wem Brook

4,845 (9)

4031 (12)

↑814

Camp Hill

7,441 (24)

5338 (16)

↑2,103

Poplar

5,222 (14)

5787 (17)

↓565

Bar Pool

8,450 (31)

5888 (18)

↑2,562

Bede

7,021 (20)

6035 (19)

↑986

Wem Brook

6,099 (16)

6450 (21)

↓351

Bede

7,071 (22)

6605 (22)

↑466

Kingswood

7,065 (21)

7098 (23)

↓33

Poplar

8,461 (32)

7831 (25)

↑630

Kingswood

8,656 (33)

8038 (27)

↑618

Abbey

8,352 (29)

8127 (29)

↑225

Camp Hill North West & Allotments Poplar Coalpit Field Bar Pool West & Recreation Ground Bede Cannons Wem Brook East Bede Bedworth Town Centre Kingswood Stockingford Schools Poplar Nicholas Chamberlain Kingswood North East Abbey North Attleborough North West

Attleborough

7,777 (26)

8140 (31)

↓363

Keresley North and Newlands

Exhall

6,686 (17)

8241 (32)

↓1,555

Exhall East

Exhall

7,696 (25)

8433 (34)

↓737

Abbey South

Abbey

9,279 (37)

8932 (36)

↑347

Bede North

Kingswood

7,395 (23)

9012 (37)

↓1,617

Abbey

10,918 (49)

9258 (39)

↑1,660

Wem Brook Bridges

Wem Brook

9,624 (39)

9444 (41)

↑180

Poplar North West

11,020 (51)

9724 (42)

↑1,296

Bar Pool East & Greenmoor

Education, Skills and Training Deprivation Domain: A total of 47 SOAs are ranked within the top 30% most deprived SOAs nationally on this measure, from 48 SOAs in the IMD 2007. Compared with the IMD 2007, there are more SOAs in top 10%, with the number rising from 11 to 15. Of the 15 SOAs, 11 have climbed up the deprivation rankings when compared with the IMD 2007. However, Camp Hill Village Centre, the most deprived SOA on this measure at County and Borough level, has fallen 50 places from rank 125 in the IMD 2007 to rank 175, but still remains within the top 1% most deprived SOAs nationally in terms of educational attainment. Health and Disability Deprivation Domain: Although there are the same number of SOAs in the top 30% most health deprived SOAs nationally in the IMD 2010 compared to the IMD 2007 (29), there is one more SOA in the top 10% in the IMD 2010, seven compared to six in the IMD 2007. Barriers to Housing and Services Domain: In the IMD 2010, there were no SOAs that featured within the top 30% most deprived SOAs nationally on this measure. The corresponding figure for the IMD 2007 is seven SOAs, of these seven, all have fallen by over 4,000 places in the 2010 index and Galley Common South East SOA has improved by a staggering 10,245 places in the 2010 indices. Crime Domain: The number of SOAs in the top 30% most crime deprived SOAs nationally fell from 39 in the IMD 2007 to 34 in the IMD 2010. Despite this, the number of SOAs within the top 10% on this measure has increased between 2007 and 2010 from nine SOAs in 2007 to 15 SOAs in 2010. Living Environment Deprivation Domain: The number of SOAs on this measure in the in top 30% rose by one SOA from 11 in the IMD 2007 to 12 in the IMD 2010.


‐ 12 ‐

Indices of Multiple Deprivation 2010 Report Figure 5: Index of Multiple Deprivation – Nuneaton and Bedworth

Table 9: Nuneaton and Bedworth Borough’s most deprived SOAs nationally (out of 82 SOAs) Top 10% Top 20% Top 30%

2007

2010 2007 2010 2007 2010

Overall IMD

6

9

13

16

28

29

Income

3

6

12

12

21

26

Employment

7

11

13

17

28

32

Health

6

7

14

17

29

29


11

15

23

24

48

47


0

0

1

0

7

0

Crime

9

15

25

27

39

34

Living Environment

1

1

6

6

11

12



‐ 13 ‐


Rugby Borough IMD 2010: A total of seven SOAs feature in the top 30% most deprived SOAs nationally, including three in the top 10‐20% and four in the top 20‐30%, compared to five in the top 30% most deprived SOAs in the IMD 2007, when one SOA featured in the top 10‐20% and four in the top 20‐30%. Table 10: Rugby Borough SOAs featuring in the top 30% most deprived SOAs nationally IMD 2007 IMD 2010 Change in Super Output Area Ward Rank Rank Ranks Brownsover South Lake District North Town Centre

Brownsover South Newbold

Overslade North West

5,205 (13)

3,314 (10)

↑1,891

6,941 (19)

4,773 (14)

↑2,168

Overslade

8,724 (34)

7,282 (24)

↑1,442

Newbold on Avon

Newbold

9,330 (38)

8,401 (33)

↑929

Overslade North

Overslade

8,167 (27)

8,525 (35)

↓358

New Bilton East

New Bilton

10,472 (44)

9,088 (38)

↑1,384

Cattlemarket Newbold 11,787 (60) 9,725 (43) *numbers in brackets are the SOAs ranked within Warwickshire 1 to 333

↑2,062


Income Deprivation Domain: Three SOAs feature in the top 10‐20% most income deprived SOAs nationally, and five in the top 20‐30%. There were also eight SOAs in the top 30% most income deprived SOAs nationally in the IMD 2007, although two SOAs were in the top 10‐20% in 2007. Out of the top eight SOAs in the top 30% most income deprived, six out of eight have seen a relative deterioration in their rankings since the 2007 indices. Employment Deprivation Domain: There has been an increase in the number of SOAs ranked in the top 30% most employment deprived SOAs in

England, from eight in the IMD 2007 to ten in the IMD 2010. The two SOAs in the top 10‐20% (Newbold Town Centre SOA and Brownsover South Lake District North SOA) in the IMD 2007 have risen to the top 10% in the IMD 2010 with a national ranking of 1,771 and 2,156 respectively. Education, Skills and Training Deprivation Domain: There are four more SOAs (nine) ranked within the top 30% most deprived SOAs nationally in terms of educational attainment in the IMD 2010 than in the IMD 2007. Brownsover South Lake District North remains in the top 10% and is joined by Overslade North West in the top 10% in the IMD 2010. Health Deprivation and Disability Domain: In the IMD 2007, one SOA features in the top 10%, two SOAs feature in the top 10‐20% and three in the top 20‐30% most health deprived SOAs nationally compared to no SOAs in the top 10%, two SOAs in the top 10‐20% and four in the top 20‐30% in the IMD 2007. Newbold Town Centre has moved up the rankings to the top 10% most health deprived SOAs in England, rising by over 1,100 places since the 2007 indices. Barriers to Housing and Services Domain: The number of SOAs on this measure within the top 10% most deprived SOAs nationally has risen from three in the IMD 2007 to four in the IMD 2010. The overall number of SOAs featuring within the top 30% most deprived SOAs nationally has stayed the same (7) between the two indices. Crime Domain: This domain saw a rise in the top 30% most crime deprived SOAs nationally between the IMD 2007 and ID 2010, from 11 to 13. However, the number of SOAs in the top 10% most deprived has fallen from the 2007 indices, from three SOAs to one in the 2010 index (Caldecott North East). A notable drop between the two indices is Caldecott North West and


‐ 14 ‐


Overslade North which were both in the top 10% most deprived on this domain in the IMD 2007 and have dropped by 8,491 and 7,252 places respectively to move out of the top 30% most deprived SOAs in the IMD 2010. Living Environment Domain: The number of SOAs featuring in the top 30% most deprived SOAs nationally on this measure rose from four in the IMD 2007 to five in the IMD 2010. This included the number of SOAs in the 10‐ 20% most deprived SOAs rising from one to two. Table 11: Rugby Borough’s most deprived SOAs nationally (out of 58 SOAs) Top 10% Top 20% Top 30%

2007

2010 2007 2010 2007 2010

Overall IMD

0

0

1

2

5

7

Income

0

0

2

3

8

8

Employment

0

2

2

4

8

10

Health

0

1

2

3

6

6


1

2

3

4

5

9


3

4

6

7

7

7

Crime

3

1

8

5

11

13

Living Environment

0

0

1

2

4

5


Figure 6: Index of Multiple Deprivation – Rugby Borough


‐ 15 ‐


Stratford‐on‐Avon District IMD 2010: No SOAs feature within the top 30% most deprived SOAs nationally in the IMD 2010. However, among the most deprived SOAs in Stratford‐on‐Avon there has been a relative rise in ranking at the national and county level since the IMD 2007. The highest ranking SOA is in Alcester ward at 10,990 (52) compared to the IMD 2007 when the highest was ranked at 11,638 (57). Income Deprivation Domain: One SOA features in the top 20‐30% most income deprived SOAs nationally, with 20% of the population experiencing income deprivation in Alcester North and Conway. In the IMD 2007, this SOA was also in the top 20‐30% most income deprived SOAs in England, although the SOA has seen a relative improvement in its rankings since 2007, dropping by 330 places between the two indices. Employment Deprivation Domain: There are two SOAs in the top 20‐30% most employment deprived SOAs nationally compared to two in the IMD 2007. T he top two SOAs ‘Stratford Mount Pleasant East’ and ‘Maybird’ moved up the rankings at a national level from ranks of 7,053 and 9,114 in the IMD 2007 to 6,644 and 7,984, respectively. Education, Skills and Training Deprivation Domain: One SOA is ranked within the top 10% (Alcester North & Conway) and one SOA in the top 20‐ 30% (Southam West) most deprived SOAs nationally in terms of educational attainment, compared to no SOAs in the top 10%, one SOA in the top 10‐20% and one SOA in the top 20‐30% most deprived SOAs nationally in the IMD 2007. 18 of the most deprived SOAs in the District on this domain went up the deprivation rankings at a national level in the IMD 2010.

Health and Disability Deprivation Domain: Three SOAs feature within the top 30% most health deprived SOAs nationally in the IMD 2010, compared to none in the IMD 2007. Out of the 71 SOAs in the District, 67 (or 94%) have seen a relative deterioration in their rankings since the IMD 2007. Barriers to Housing and Services Domain: A total of 31 SOAs feature within the top 30% most deprived SOAs nationally on this measure compared to 33 in the IMD 2007. However, despite the fall on the SOAs in the top 30%, the number of SOAs within the top 10% most deprived on this domain has risen from 14 to 17 SOAs in the IMD 2010. Due to the predominantly rural nature of Stratford‐on‐Avon, this high deprivation ranking is largely influenced by the sub‐domain indicators measuring Geographical Access to Key Services in the form of road distance to key local services such as a GP surgery, general stores or supermarkets, primary schools and post offices. This measure does not include individual retailers or garages selling convenience goods. Crime Domain: One SOA featured in the top 30% most crime deprived in the IMD 2010, staying the same as the IMD 2007. However, the SOA that is now within the top 30% most deprived in the IMD 2010 (Quinton) has risen by over 11,000 places between the two indices from a national ranking of 21,107 in 2007 to a ranking of 9,364 in 2010. A notable drop in the IMD 2010 was Studley East and Priory which was in the top 30% most deprived in the IMD 2007 but dropped over 14,000 places in the national rankings to take it out of the top 30% most crime deprived in the 2010 index. Living Environment Deprivation Domain: One SOA features in the top 30% most deprived SOAs nationally on this measure, remaining unchanged since the 2007 index. ‘Town Centre North’ SOA in Stratford Avenue and New Town ward in the top 20‐30% is the most deprived SOA in the District on this


‐ 16 ‐


measure, although it has improved relatively speaking on its national ranking, dropping to 9,633 from 9,587 in the IMD 2007. Table 12: Stratford‐on‐Avon District’s most deprived SOAs nationally (out of 71 SOAs) Top 10% Top 20% Top 30%

2007

2010 2007 2010 2007 2010

Overall IMD

0

0

0

0

0

0

Income

0

0

0

0

1

1

Employment

0

0

0

0

2

2

Health

0

0

0

0

0

3


0

1

1

1

2

2


14

17

29

27

33

31

Crime

0

0

0

0

1

1

Living Environment

0

0

0

0

1

1


Figure 7: Index of Multiple Deprivation – Stratford‐on‐Avon



‐ 17 ‐


Warwick District IMD 2010: As highlighted in Table 13, Lillington East still remains in the top 10‐20% most deprived SOAs nationally and has risen in its rankings and relative deprivation. Two SOAs that feature in the top 30% most deprived SOAs have a higher ranking of deprivation in the IMD 2010 than in the IMD 2007. Table 13: Warwick District’s SOAs featuring in the top 30% most deprived SOAs nationally IMD 2007 IMD 2010 Change in Super Output Area Ward Rank Rank Ranks Lillington East Crown 5,653 (15) 4,358 (13) Packmores West & The 8,775 (35) 8,011 (26) Warwick West Cape Brunswick South West & 8,821 (36) 8,092 (28) Brunswick Kingsway Brunswick South East Brunswick 8,378 (30) 9,343 (40) *numbers in brackets are the SOAs ranked within Warwickshire 1 to 333

↑1,295 ↑764 ↑729 ↓965


Income Deprivation Domain: Five SOAs are ranked within the top 30% most income deprived SOAs in England, of which two feature in the top 10‐20%, compared to seven SOAs in the top 30% most income deprived in the IMD 2007, one of which was in the top 10‐20% most deprived nationally. Lillington East has moved up the national rankings and is now the most deprived SOA in the District on this measure, featuring in the top 10‐20% most deprived SOAs compared to the top 20‐30% in the IMD 2007. In contrast while Brunswick South East remains in the top 10‐20% it has seen a relative improvement in its rankings, dropping 940 places from the 2007 index.

Employment Deprivation Domain: Four SOAs feature in the top 30% most deprived SOAs nationally for this measure in Warwick District, compared to one in the IMD 2007. Lillington East continues to be in the top 10% most deprived SOAs although it had seen a deterioration in its rankings since 2007, rising by 1,340 places. There is also a considerable gap in rankings between this SOA and the next most deprived SOA in Warwick District on this measure (Sydenham West) – 7,683 places. Education, Skills and Training Deprivation Domain: A total of ten SOAs are ranked within the top 30% most deprived SOAs nationally in terms of educational attainment, remaining unchanged from the IMD 2007. Three SOAs now feature in the top 10% most deprived on this measure, compared to one in the IMD 2007. The top four most deprived SOAs on this measure have all seen deterioration in their relative rankings since the 2007 index. Health and Disability Deprivation Domain: Two SOAs feature in the top 30% most health deprived SOAs nationally compared to two in the IMD 2007. Brunswick South West and Kingsway is the most deprived SOA in the District on this measure, featuring in the top 20‐30% and it has risen by 2,457 places between the two indices meaning it is relatively more deprived than it was in the 2007 index. Barriers to Housing and Services Domain: A total of 15 SOAs feature in the top 30% most deprived SOAs nationally on this measure, including five in the top 10% and one in the top 1%. This compares to 37 SOAs in the top 30% in the IMD 2007 including 13 in the top 10% and five areas in the top 1% most deprived SOAs nationally. All of Warwick District’s 84 SOAs have seen an improvement in their relative rankings since the IMD 2007 and unlike the other Districts, the SOAs featuring in the top 30% most deprived SOAs nationally in the sub‐domain of wider barriers to housing will have relatively


‐ 18 ‐


more influence than the geographical access to key services sub‐domain in defining the more deprived areas of the whole domain. Crime Domain: There are more SOAs appearing within the top 30% most crime deprived SOAs nationally, doubling from six in the IMD 2007 to twelve in the IMD 2010. There are now four SOAs that feature in the top 10% most crime deprived nationally, compared to one in the IMD 2007. The top eight most deprived SOAs in the District on this measure have all seen a relative deterioration in their rankings between the two indices. Living Environment Deprivation Domain: Four SOAs feature in the top 30% most deprived SOAs nationally on this measure compared to five in the IMD 2007. The number of areas in the top 20‐30% has reduced from three to two. Table 14: Warwick District’s most deprived SOAs nationally (out of 84 SOAs) Top 10% Top 20% Top 30%

2010

2007 2010 2007 2010 2007

Overall IMD

0

0

1

1

4

4

Income

0

0

2

1

5

7

Employment

1

1

1

1

4

1

Health

0

0

0

0

2

2


3

1

6

5

10

10


5

13

12

24

15

37

Crime

4

1

9

3

12

6

Living Environment

0

0

2

2

4

5


Figure 8: Index of Multiple Deprivation – Warwick District



‐ 19 ‐

Indices of Multiple Deprivation 2010 Report Figure 9: Index of Multiple Deprivation – Income Deprivation

Domain Analysis

Income Deprivation Domain The purpose of this domain is to capture the proportion of the population experiencing income deprivation in an area. The supplementary income indices (income deprivation affecting children and income deprivation affecting older people) also feature in this report. •

A total of 43 SOAs are ranked in the top 30% most income deprived SOAs nationally, up from 40 SOAs on the same measure in 2007. Over three in five (26 SOAs) of these SOAs are in Nuneaton & Bedworth Borough, followed by eight SOAs in Rugby, five in Warwick, three in North Warwickshire and one SOA that is in Stratford‐on‐Avon.

•

There are also more SOAs in the top 10% (six SOAs compared to three in 2007). The six SOAs in the top 10% most income deprived SOAs in England are in Nuneaton & Bedworth (shown in Table 15).

Table 15: Warwickshire SOAs in 10% most income deprived nationally National SOA Name Ward District Rank

Most Deprived %


Bar Pool

Nun & Bed

656

Top 2%


Camp Hill

Nun & Bed

715

Top 3%


Wem Brook Nun & Bed

1,193

Top 4%


Kingswood

Nun & Bed

2,390

Top 8%

Bede East

Bede

Nun & Bed

2,798

Top 9%

2,950

Top 10%

Nun & Bed Abbey Town Centre Abbey Note: National Rank is from 1 to 32,482 where 1 is most deprived



‐ 20 ‐


Employment Deprivation Domain This domain measures employment deprivation conceptualised as involuntary exclusion of the working age population from the labour market. •

55 SOAs feature in the top 30% most employment deprived SOAs nationally, an increase of 12 SOAs from the 43 in the IMD 2007. Of these 55 SOAs, 32 are in Nuneaton & Bedworth, ten in Rugby, seven in North Warwickshire, four in Warwick and two in Stratford‐on‐ Avon.

•

There were nine SOAs in the top 10% most deprived on this domain in IMD 2007, this increased to 15 SOAs in the IMD 2010. 11 of the 15 SOAs are in Nuneaton & Bedworth, two SOAs in Rugby and one in both North Warwickshire and Warwick.

Note: National Rank is from 1 to 32,482 where 1 is most deprived Figure 10: Index of Multiple Deprivation – Employment Deprivation

Table 16: Warwickshire SOAs in 10% most employment deprived nationally SOA Name

Ward

District

National Most Rank Deprived %

Abbey

Nun & Bed

635

Top 2%


Camp Hill

Nun & Bed

856

Top 3%


Bar Pool

Nun & Bed

884

Top 3%

Crown

Warwick

1,265

Top 4%


Kingswood

Nun & Bed

1,298

Top 4%


Wem Brook

Nun & Bed

1,491

Top 5%

Newbold

Rugby

1,771

Top 6%

Bede

Nun & Bed

1,803

Top 6%

Camp Hill

Nun & Bed

1,930

Top 6%

Wem Brook

Nun & Bed

2,016

Top 7%

Rugby

2,156

Top 7%

Wem Brook

Nun & Bed

2,469

Top 8%

Bede

Nun & Bed

2,692

Top 9%


Atherstone Central

N Warks

3,048

Top 10%

Bede Bedworth Town Centre

Bede

Nun & Bed

3,193

Top 10%

Abbey Town Centre

Lillington East

Town Centre Bede East Camp Hill West & Quarry Riversley

Brownsover South Lake District North Brownsover South Hill Top Bede Cannons


‐ 21 ‐


Education, Skills and Training Deprivation Domain This domain captures the extent of deprivation in terms of education, skills and training in a local area. The indicators are structured into two sub‐ domains: one relating to education deprivation for children/young people in the area, and one relating to lack of skills and qualifications among a sub‐set of the working age adult population. •

There are 81 Warwickshire SOAs ranked within the top 30% most deprived SOAs in terms of education, skills and training in England, two more SOAs than in the 2007 Indices. Of these 81 SOAs, 47 are located in Nuneaton & Bedworth, 13 are in North Warwickshire, 10 in Warwick, nine in Rugby and two SOAs are in Stratford‐on‐Avon.

•


Camp Hill

Nun & Bed

175

Top 0.5%


Kingswood

Nun & Bed

330

Top 2%


Bar Pool

Nun & Bed

336

Top 2%


Camp Hill

Nun & Bed

350

Top 2%


Wem Brook

Nun & Bed

704

Top 3%

Camp Hill

Nun & Bed

960

Top 3%


Atherstone C

N Warks

1,107

Top 4%

Hill Top

Wem Brook

Nun & Bed

1,185

Top 4%

Atherstone S.

N Warks

1,265

Top 4%

Rugby

1,311

Top 4%

Bede

Nun & Bed

1,611

Top 5%

Dordon

N Warks

1,642

Top 6%

N Warks

1,718

Top 6%

Camp Hill West & Quarry

Mancetter South & Ridge Lane

Brownsover South Lake District North Brownsover S Bede East

There are more SOAs in the top 10% most deprived nationally on this measure in the latest indices than in the IMD 2007, 25 SOAs compared to 17.

•

Table 17: Warwickshire SOAs in 10% most deprived SOAs nationally in terms of educational attainment Most National SOA Name Ward District Deprived Rank %

As in the IMD 2007, Camp Hill Village Centre continues to be ranked within the most deprived 1% in England on this measure.

Dordon Village

Atherstone N. ‐ St. Georges & Carlyon Atherstone N. Warwick Packmores West & The Cape West Kingswood Stockingford Schools Kingswood

Warwick

1,886

Top 6%

Nun & Bed

2,056

Top 7%

Wem Brook East

Wem Brook

Nun & Bed

2,089

Top 7%

Crown

Warwick

2,344

Top 8%

Overslade North West

Overslade

Rugby

2,671

Top 9%

Camp Hill North West & Allotments

Camp Hill

Nun & Bed

2,832

Top 9%

Brunswick North West & Foundry

Brunswick

Warwick

2,916

Top 10%

Abbey Priory

Abbey

Nun & Bed

2,923

Top 10%

Poplar Nicholas Chamberlain

Poplar

Nun & Bed

2,938

Top 10%

Kingswood

Nun & Bed

2,952

Top 10%

Alcester

Stratford

2,974

Top 10%

3,001

Top 10%

Lillington East

Kingswood North East Alcester North & Conway

Bede North Bede Nun & Bed Note: National Rank is from 1 to 32,482 where 1 is most deprived



‐ 22 ‐

Indices of Multiple Deprivation 2010 Report Figure 11: Index of Multiple Deprivation – Education, Skills & Training Deprivation

Health Deprivation and Disability Domain This domain measures rates of poor health, early mortality and disability in an area and covers the entire age range. •

A total of 43 SOAs in Warwickshire feature within the top 30% most health deprived SOAs in England, compared to 41 on this measure in the IMD 2007. Of these 43 SOAs, 29 are in Nuneaton & Bedworth, six in Rugby, three in North Warwickshire, three in Stratford‐on‐Avon and two are in Warwick.

•

Of the eight SOAs in the top 10% most health deprived SOAs in England, seven are in Nuneaton & Bedworth and one in Rugby. This is two more than in the IMD 2007.

Table 18: Warwickshire SOAs in 10% most deprived SOAs nationally in terms of health deprivation National Most SOA Name Ward District Rank Deprived % Bar Pool North & Crescents

Bar Pool

Nun & Bed

594

Top 2%

Abbey

Nun & Bed

833

Top 3%


Camp Hill

Nun & Bed

1,378

Top 5%


Kingswood

Nun & Bed

1,954

Top 7%

Hill Top

Wem Brook

Nun & Bed

2,962

Top 10%

Newbold

Rugby

3,039

Top 10%

Attleborough

Nun & Bed

3,121

Top 10%

Abbey

Nun & Bed

3,174 Note: National Rank is from 1 to 32,482 where 1 is most deprived

Top 10%

Abbey Town Centre

Town Centre Attleborough North West Abbey Priory



‐ 23 ‐

Indices of Multiple Deprivation 2010 Report Figure 12: Index of Multiple Deprivation – Health Deprivation & Disability

Barriers to Housing and Services Domain The purpose of this domain is to measure barriers to housing and key local services. The indicators are structured into two sub‐domains: ‘geographical barriers’, and ‘wider barriers’ which includes issues relating to access to housing, such as affordability. •

A total of 63 areas in Warwickshire are ranked in the top 30% most deprived SOAs in England in terms of access to services and housing, compared to the higher number of 97 in the IMD 2007. Of these 63 SOAs, 31 in Stratford‐on‐Avon, 15 are in Warwick with a further ten in North Warwickshire and seven in Rugby. There are no SOAs in the top 30% most deprived in terms of access to services and housing in Nuneaton & Bedworth.

•

Some 29 SOAs feature in the top 10% compared to 35 on this measure in the IMD 2007. Also two SOAs located in Stratford‐on‐ Avon and one SOA in Warwick are ranked in the top 1% most deprived areas in England in terms of access to services and housing. These areas are Stoneleigh in Warwick District ranked 163rd (out of 32,482 SOAs) and Ladbroke & Priors and Long Compton SOAs in Stratford‐on‐Avon which are ranked 195th and 276th respectively.


‐ 24 ‐

Indices of Multiple Deprivation 2010 Report Table 19: Warwickshire SOAs in 10% most deprived SOAs nationally in terms of access to housing and services deprivation National Most SOA Name Ward District Rank Deprived % Stoneleigh Ladbroke & Priors

Stoneleigh

Warwick

163

Top 0.5%

Fenny Compton

Stratford

195

Top 1%

Long Compton

Stratford

276

Top 1%

Leam Valley

Rugby

492

Top 2%

Wroxhall, Hasely & Honiley Bubbenhall, Wappenbury, Weston & Eathorpe Welford

Leek Wootton

Warwick

671

Top 3%

Cubbington

Warwick

735

Top 3%

Welford

Stratford

836

Top 3%

Burton Dassett Lapworth South, Bushwood, Lowsonford & Rowington Fosse East Easenhall, Newton & Biggin and Harborough Magna Brailes

Burton Dassett

Stratford

900

Top 3%

Lapworth

Warwick

935

Top 3%

Fosse

Rugby

1,218

Top 4%

Avon and Swift

Rugby

1,427

Top 5%

Brailes

Stratford

1,434

Top 5%

Bardon

Stratford

1,874

Top 6%

Tanworth

Tanworth

Stratford

1,894

Top 6%

Claverdon

Claverdon

Stratford

2,033

Top 7%

Ettington

Ettington

Stratford

2,051

Top 7%

Corley

Fillongley

N Warks

2,206

Top 7%

Aston Cantlow

Stratford

2,220

Top 7%

Fillongley and The Packingtons

Fillongley

N Warks

2,289

Top 8%

Marston and Water Park Newbold‐on‐Stour, Ilmington East & Whitchurch Moreton Morrell, Ashorne & Newbold Pacey Vale of the Red Horse

Curdworth

N Warks

2,377

Top 8%

Tredington

Stratford

2,534

Top 8%

Wellesbourne

Stratford

2,540

Top 8%

Vale of Red Horse

Stratford

2,864

Top 9%

Long Compton Leam Valley

Bardon

Aston Cantlow

SOA Name

Ward

District

National Most Rank Deprived %

Stratford

2,985

Top 10%

Sambourne Sambourne Stratford Leek Wootton, Guys Cliffe & Leek Wootton Warwick Beausale Princethorpe, Marton, Dunchurch &Knightlow Rugby Frankton, Bourton & Draycote Hampton Lucy & Fulbrook Snitterfield Stratford Quinton Quinton Stratford

3,036

Top 10%

3,158

Top 10%

3,198

Top 10%

3,213

Top 10%

3,248

Top 10%

Wellesbourne South

Wellesbourne

Note: National Rank is from 1 to 32,482 where 1 is most deprived Source: English Indices of Deprivation, Department for Communities & Local Government


‐ 25 ‐

Indices of Multiple Deprivation 2010 Report Figure 13: Index of Multiple Deprivation – Barriers to Housing & Services

Crime Domain This domain measures the rate of recorded crime for four major crime types, representing the risk of personal and material victimisation at small area level. •

63 Warwickshire SOAs are ranked in the top 30% most crime deprived areas in England, up from 57 SOAs on this measure in the IMD 2007. Of these 63 SOAs, 34 are within Nuneaton & Bedworth, 13 in Rugby, 12 in Warwick, 3 SOAs in North Warwickshire and one SOA in Stratford‐on‐Avon.

•

20 SOAs in Warwickshire are in the top 10% most crime deprived areas in England in the latest indices, compared to 13 in the 2007 index. 15 of these 20 SOAs are in Nuneaton & Bedworth, with a further four in Warwick and one SOA in Rugby.

•

Abbey Priory remains the most deprived SOA in the County at this measure from the IMD 2007. Of the top 10% most deprived SOAs on this measure (20 SOAs), 17 SOAs have seen a relative deterioration in their rankings since the 2007 index.


‐ 26 ‐

Indices of Multiple Deprivation 2010 Report Table 20: Warwickshire SOAs in 10% most deprived SOAs nationally in terms of crime deprivation National Most SOA Name Ward District Rank Deprived % Top 2%

Abbey Priory

Abbey

Nun & Bed

431

Poplar North West

Poplar

Nun & Bed

878

Top 3%


Camp Hill

Nun & Bed

897

Top 3%

Campion Hills & Newbold Comyn

Clarendon

Warwick

965

Top 4%

Milverton South East Bar Pool West & Recreation Ground Kingswood Grove Farm & Rural

Milverton

Warwick

993

Top 4%

Bar Pool

Nun & Bed

1,190

Top 4%

Kingswood Nun & Bed

1,308

Top 5%

Abbey

Nun & Bed

1,503

Top 5%

Bar Pool

Nun & Bed

1,757

Top 6%

Camp Hill

Nun & Bed

1,991

Top 7%

Arbury

Nun & Bed

2,228

Top 7%

Willes

Warwick

2,240

Top 7%

2,255 2,374 2,791

Top 7% Top 8% Top 9%

3,023

Top 10%

Camp Hill Nun & Bed 3,035 Wem Brook Nun & Bed 3,036 Bede Nun & Bed 3,040 Galley Chapel End Nun & Bed 3,225 Common Note: National Rank is from 1 to 32,482 where 1 is most deprived

Top 10% Top 10% Top 10%

Abbey Town Centre Bar Pool North & Crescents Camp Hill North West & Allotments Arbury Rural Old Town North West Kingswood Stockingford Schools Caldecott North East Riversley Brunswick South West & kingsway Camp Hill South West & Brook Hill Top Bede Bedworth Town Centre

Kingswood Nun & Bed Caldecott Rugby Wem Brook Nun & Bed Brunswick

Warwick

Figure 14: Index of Multiple Deprivation – Crime and Disorder Deprivation

Top 10%



‐ 27 ‐

Indices of Multiple Deprivation 2010 Report Figure 15: Index of Multiple Deprivation – Living Environment

The Living Environment Deprivation Domain This domain focuses on deprivation with respect to the characteristics of the living environment. It comprises two sub‐domains: the ‘indoors’ living environment which measures the quality of housing, and the ‘outdoors’ living environment which contains two measures about air quality and road traffic accidents. •

A total of 23 SOAs in Warwickshire are ranked within the top 30% most deprived SOAs in England in terms of living environment, up from 22 areas on the same measure in the 2007 indices. Of these 23 areas, 12 are in Nuneaton & Bedworth, four SOAs are in Rugby, five in Warwick and one in both North Warwickshire and Stratford‐on‐ Avon.

•

The Abbey Priory area of Nuneaton & Bedworth Borough is the only area in Warwickshire to feature in the top 10% most deprived SOAs nationally in terms of living environment. This remains the same from the IMD 2007.

Table 21: Warwickshire SOAs in 10% most deprived SOAs nationally in terms of living environment deprivation SOA Name Ward District National Rank Most Deprived % Abbey Priory

Abbey

Nun & Bed

793

Top 3%



‐ 28 ‐

Indices of Multiple Deprivation 2010 Report Figure 16: Index of Multiple Deprivation – Income Deprivation Affecting Children

Supplementary Indices Income Deprivation Affecting Children Index

This index represents the proportion of children aged 0‐15 living in income deprived households. •

44 SOAs in Warwickshire are ranked within the 30% most deprived SOAs in England experiencing income deprivation affecting children, compared to 42 in the 2007 indices. Of these 44 SOAs, 20 are in Nuneaton & Bedworth, 11 in Warwick, eight in Rugby, four in North Warwickshire and one are in Stratford‐on‐Avon.

•

Three areas feature within the top 10% most deprived SOAs, remaining the same as the IMD 2007, all of which are located in Nuneaton & Bedworth. The top ranking area in Warwickshire is Camp Hill Village Centre SOA in Camp Hill ward located in Nuneaton & Bedworth, with 56% of children aged 0‐15 living in income deprived households, followed by 56% in Middlemarch and Swimming Pool SOA and 54% Bar Pool North and Crescents.

Table 22: Warwickshire SOAs in 10% most deprived SOAs nationally in terms of income deprivation affecting children National Most SOA Name Ward District Rank Deprived % Camp Hill Village Centre Middlemarch & Swimming Pool Bar Pool North & Crescents

Camp Hill

Nun & Bed

1,206

Top 4%

Wem Brook

Nun & Bed

1,268

Top 4%

Bar Pool

Nun & Bed

1,530

Top 5%



‐ 29 ‐


Income Deprivation Affecting Older People Index This index represents the proportion of older people aged 60 and over living in income deprived households. •

On this measure in the IMD 2010, 42 SOAs in Warwickshire fall into the top 30% most deprived SOAs nationally, compared to 49 in the IMD 2007. Of the 42 SOAs, 22 are located in Nuneaton & Bedworth, nine are in Warwick, five in Rugby, four SOAs in North Warwickshire and two SOAs in Stratford‐on‐Avon.

•

The number of Warwickshire SOAs in the top 10% most deprived areas nationally on this measure has fallen from six areas in the IMD 2007 to four in the IMD 2010, all four of which are located in Nuneaton & Bedworth. The only SOA in Warwickshire with over half (54%) of the older population aged 60 and over living in income deprived households is the area of Bar Pool North & Crescents in Nuneaton & Bedworth.

Table 23: Warwickshire SOAs in 10% most deprived SOAs nationally in terms of income deprivation affecting older people Most National SOA Name Ward District Deprived Rank % Bar Pool North & Crescents

Bar Pool

Nun. & Bed.

770

Top 3%

Bede East

Bede

Nun. & Bed.

1,634

Top 6%

Poplar Coalpit Field

Poplar

Nun. & Bed.

2,208

Top 7%

Kingswood Nun. & Bed.

2,481

Top 8%



Figure 17: Index of Multiple Deprivation – Income Deprivation Affecting Older People


‐ 30 ‐


Sub‐domains

Education, Skills and Training Deprivation – Children and Young People This sub‐domain of the education, skills and training deprivation domain reflects the lack of educational attainment amongst children and young people. •

A total of 73 SOAs in Warwickshire are ranked within the top 30% most deprived SOAs in England in terms of educational attainment, eight more SOAs than the 65 on the same measure in the 2007 indices. Over half (31) of these areas are in Nuneaton & Bedworth, as well as a further 15 in Rugby, 13 in Warwick, 11 in North Warwickshire and three in Stratford‐on‐Avon.

•

The total number of SOAs falling within the top 30% most deprived on this measure has increased, as has the number in the top 10% compared to the IMD 2007 (15 in the IMD 2007 compared to 23 in the IMD 2010).

Table 24: Warwickshire SOAs in 10% most deprived SOAs nationally in terms of the educational attainment of children and young people Most National SOA Name Ward District Deprived Rank % Bar Pool North & Crescents Bar Pool Nun & Bed Kingswood Grove Farm & Rural Kingswood Nun & Bed Camp Hill Village Centre Camp Hill Nun & Bed Middlemarch & Swimming Pool Wem Brook Nun & Bed Camp Hill South West & Brook Camp Hill Nun & Bed Overslade North West Overslade Rugby Camp Hill West & Quarry Camp Hill Nun & Bed Brownsover South Lake District N. Brownsover S Rugby Packmores West & The Cape Warwick W. Warwick Kingswood Stockingford Schools Kingswood Nun & Bed Atherstone Central ‐ Centre Atherstone C N Warks Lillington East Crown Warwick Hill Top Wem Brook Nun & Bed New Arley West and Old Arley Arley&Whitacre N Warks Lillington South Crown Warwick Dordon Village Dordon N Warks Kingswood North East Kingswood Nun & Bed Mancetter South and Ridge Lane Atherstone S. N Warks Brunswick North West & Foundry Brunswick Warwick Alcester North & Conway Alcester Stratford Abbey Priory Abbey Nun & Bed Brunswick South West & Kingsway Brunswick Warwick Atherstone N. St. Georges & Carlyon Atherstone N. N Warks Note: National Rank is from 1 to 32,482 where 1 is most deprived

92 210 354 396 535 605 816 994 1,141 1,149 1,230 1,344 1,683 1,794 1,971 2,101 2,108 2,267 2,363 2,429 2,433 2,616 2,631



‐ 31 ‐

Top 1% Top 1% Top 2% Top 2% Top 2% Top 2% Top 3% Top 4% Top 4% Top 4% Top 4% Top 5% Top 6% Top 6% Top 7% Top 7% Top 7% Top 8% Top 8% Top 8% Top 8% Top 9% Top 9%


Education, Skills and Training Deprivation – Skills This sub‐domain of the education, skills and training deprivation domain reflects the lack of skills and qualifications of the working age population of an area. •

Due to the fact this sub‐domain uses the same 2001 Census data in the IMD 2010 as in the IMD 2007, there will be no change in relative rankings or deprivation to remark upon. Therefore, as on this measure in the IMD 2007, the latest indices have a total of 86 SOAs in Warwickshire ranked within the top 30% most deprived SOAs nationally in terms of skills. This includes 20 SOAs in the top 10%, 37 areas in the top 10‐20% and a further 29 in the top 20‐30% most deprived SOAs in England in terms of skills. Of the 86 SOAs, 54 are in Nuneaton & Bedworth, 16 in North Warwickshire, nine in Warwick, five in Rugby and two SOAs are in Stratford‐on‐Avon.

Table 25: Warwickshire SOAs in 10% most deprived SOAs nationally in terms of the skills and qualifications of the working age population Most National SOA Name Ward District Deprived Rank % Camp Hill Village Centre

Camp Hill

Nun & Bed

364

Top 2%


Camp Hill

Nun & Bed

670

Top 3%

Bede

Nun & Bed

778

Top 3%

Mancetter South & Ridge Lane

Atherstone S

N Warks.

981

Top 4%


Kingswood

Nun & Bed

1,156

Top 4%

Wem Brook East

Wem Brook

Nun & Bed

1,224

Top 4%

Hill Top

Wem Brook

Nun & Bed

1,229

Top 4%

Atherstone N. St Georges & Carlyon Atherstone N

N Warks.

1,379

Top 5%


Atherstone C

N Warks.

1,517

Top 5%


Bar Pool

Nun & Bed

1,555

Top 5%

Dordon Village

Dordon

N Warks.

1,620

Top 6%

Camp Hill

Nun & Bed

1,751

Top 6%

Bede

Nun & Bed

1,884

Top 6%

Wem Brook

Nun & Bed

1,891

Top 6%

Poplar

Nun & Bed

2,057

Top 7%

Brownsover South Lake District N.

Brownsover S

Rugby

2,363

Top 8%

Camp Hill North West & Allotments

Camp Hill

Nun & Bed

2,653

Top 9%

Bar Pool West & Recreation Ground

Bar Pool

Nun & Bed

2,674

Top 9%

Brunswick

Warwick

2,715

Top 9%

Abbey

Nun & Bed

3,051

Top 10%

Bede East

Camp Hill West & Quarry Bede North Middlemarch & Swimming Pool Poplar Nicholas Chamberlain

Brunswick South East Abbey North



‐ 32 ‐


Barriers to Housing and Services – Wider Barriers This sub‐domain of the barriers to housing and services considers issues relating to access to housing such as affordability but also measures overcrowding and homelessness. •

11 SOAs in Warwickshire featured within the top 30% most deprived SOAs in England in terms of wider barriers to housing, compared to 73 areas on this measure in the IMD 2007.

Barriers to Housing and Services Domain – Geographical Barriers This sub‐domain of the barriers to housing and services considers issues relating to difficulty of access to key services – GP surgery, supermarket or general store, primary school, and Post Office or sub post office (in terms of road distance). •

•

There were no Warwickshire SOAs ranked in the top 20% in the latest indices.

•

On this measure in the IMD 2010, 10 out of the 11 Warwickshire SOAs in the top 30% most deprived nationally were located in Warwick District, and one in Stratford‐on‐Avon. In the previous 2007 index, of the 73 SOAs in the top 30% most deprived on this measure, 57 were in Warwick District, 13 in Nuneaton and Bedworth and 3 in Stratford‐on‐Avon.

•

There is one more SOA in the top 10% most deprived (53) and one less in the top 1% (3) compared with the 2007 indices.

•

Of the 121 Warwickshire SOAs within the top 30% most deprived nationally in terms of difficulty of access to key services, 39 SOAs are located in Stratford‐on‐Avon District, 28 in Warwick, 21 in North Warwickshire, 17 in Nuneaton & Bedworth and 16 SOAs in Rugby.

In total 121 Warwickshire SOAs are ranked in the top 30% most deprived SOAs in England in terms of difficulty of access to key services, fewer than the 124 SOAs on the same measure in the IMD 2007.


‐ 33 ‐

Indices of Multiple Deprivation 2010 Report Table 26: Warwickshire SOAs in 10% most deprived SOAs nationally in terms of the geographical access to key services SOA Name

Ward

District

National Rank

Most Deprived %

New Arley South and Over Whitacre Sambourne

Arley and Whitacre

N Warks

1,252

Top 4%

Sambourne

Stratford

1,315

Top 5%

Stratford

1,319

Top 5%

Vale of the Red Horse

Vale of the Red Horse

Long Compton

Stratford

128

Top 0.5%

Aston Cantlow

Aston Cantlow

Stratford

1,458

Top 5%

Leam Valley

Rugby

132

Top 0.5%

Fosse West

Fenny Compton

Stratford

231

Top 1%

Fosse

Rugby

332

Top 2%

Welford

Stratford

388

Top 2%

Leek Wootton

Warwick

454

Top 2%

Cubbington

Warwick

547

Top 2%

Brailes

Stratford

574

Top 2%

Burton Dassett

Burton Dassett

Stratford

699

Top 3%

Easenhall, Newton & Biggin and Harborough Magna

Avon and Swift

Rugby

747

Top 3%

Stoneleigh

Stoneleigh

Warwick

802

Top 3%

Marston and Water Park

Curdworth

N Warks

803

Top 3%

Claverdon

Claverdon

Stratford

911

Top 3%

Fillongley and The Packingtons

Fillongley

N Warks

940

Top 3%

Baddesley Common, Baxterley and Merevale

Tanworth

Tanworth

Stratford

957

Top 3%

Kinwarton

Lapworth South, Bushwood, Lowsonford & Rowington

Lapworth

Warwick

973

Top 4%

Corley

Fillongley

N Warks

996

Top 4%

Church Lawford, Kings Newnham & Long Lawford North

Wellesbourne South

Wellesbourne

Stratford

1,065

Top 4%

Princethorpe, Marton, Frankton, Bourton & Draycote Moreton Morrell, Ashorne & Newbold Pacey

Dunchurch and Knightlow

Rugby

1,069

Top 4%

Wellesbourne

Stratford

1,094

Top 4%

Bardon

Stratford

1,099

Top 4%

Sherbourne, Barford & Wasperton

Leek Wootton

Warwick

1,109

Top 4%

Lapworth

Warwick

1,113

Top 4%

Stratford South East & Alveston Hill Hampton‐on‐the‐Hill

Tredington

Stratford

1,127

Top 4%

Note: National Rank is from 1 to 32,482 where 1 is most deprived

Ettington

Stratford

1,169

Top 4%


Snitterfield

Stratford

1,213

Top 4%

Long Compton Leam Valley Ladbroke & Priors Fosse East Welford Wroxhall, Hasely & Honiley Bubbenhall, Wappenbury, Weston & Eathorpe Brailes

Bardon Leek Wootton, Guys Cliffe & Beausale Lapworth North, Baddesley Clinton & High Cross Newbold‐on‐Stour, Ilmington East & Whitchurch Ettington Hampton Lucy & Fulbrook

Fosse

Rugby

1,489

Top 5%

Grendon, Bradley Green and Whittington

Baddesley and Grendon

N Warks

1,531

Top 5%

Offchurch & Hunningham

Radford Semele

Warwick

1,796

Top 6%

Stockton and Napton

Stratford

1,828

Top 6%

Castle & Burton Green

Abbey

Warwick

1,847

Top 6%

Tredington & Blackwell

Tredington

Stratford

1,961

Top 7%

Quinton

Stratford

2,022

Top 7%

Snitterfield & Wolverton

Snitterfield

Stratford

2,029

Top 7%

Earlswood

Tanworth

Stratford

2,030

Top 7%

Wolvey

Rugby

2,361

Top 8%

N Warks

2,373

Top 8%

N Warks

2,382

Top 8%

Kinwarton

Stratford

2,523

Top 8%

Napton on the Hill

Quinton

Wolvey Newton Regis, Austrey and Seckington

Long Itchington West & Ufton

Long itchington

Stratford

2,645

Top 9%

Lawford and King's Newnham

Rugby

2,717

Top 9%

Curdworth and Wishaw

Curdworth

N Warks

2,766

Top 9%

Hatton & Hampton Magna

Budbrooke

Warwick

2,851

Top 9%

Park Hill

Warwick

2,983

Top 10%

Wellesbourne

Stratford

2,984

Top 10%

Budbrooke

Warwick

3,059

Top 10%

Stratford Alveston Budbrooke Dunchurch and Knightlow

Stratford Warwick

3,179 3,208

Top 10% Top 10%

Rugby

3,241

Top 10%

Mill End East & Crackley

Newton Regis and Warton Baddesley and Grendon

Wellesbourne West

Thurlaston


‐ 34 ‐


Living Environment Deprivation Domain – The ‘indoors’ living environment This sub‐domain of the Living Environment Deprivation Domain relates to the quality of housing in an area. •

There are the same number of Warwickshire SOAs featuring in the top 30% most deprived nationally in terms of indoors living environment in the IMD 2010 as there were in the IMD 2007, 30 SOAs. Of these 30 SOAs, 13 are in Nuneaton & Bedworth, six are in Warwick, five are in Rugby, four in Stratford‐on‐Avon, and two SOAs are in North Warwickshire.

Living Environment Deprivation Domain – The ‘outdoors’ living environment This sub‐domain of the Living Environment Deprivation Domain relates to the outdoor living environment of an area. It includes measures of air quality and road traffic accidents involving injury to pedestrians and cyclists. •

The number of Warwickshire SOAs featuring in the top 30% most deprived SOAs nationally in terms of the outdoor living environment rose from 29 on this measure in the IMD 2007 to 41 SOAs in the latest 2010 indices. Of these 41 SOAs, 20 are in Nuneaton & Bedworth, followed by nine in Rugby, eight in Warwick and four in North Warwickshire. No SOAs in Stratford‐on‐Avon feature within this top 30%.

•

There are four SOAs in the top 10% most deprived SOAs in England in terms of the outdoors living environment compared to two on the same measure in the 2007 indices.

•

There is one SOA in Warwickshire in the top 10% most deprived SOAs on this measure in the latest indices, remaining the same from the IMD 2007. Abbey Priory located in Nuneaton & Bedworth, featuring in the top 10% most deprived in England in terms of living environment.

Table 27: Warwickshire SOAs in 10% most deprived SOAs nationally in terms of the indoors living environment SOA Name Ward District National Rank Most Deprived % Abbey Priory

Abbey

Nun & Bed

1,172

Top 4%

Table 28: Warwickshire SOAs in 10% most deprived SOAs nationally in terms of the outdoors living environment SOA Name Ward District National Rank Most Deprived % Milverton S.E. Exhall East

Note: National Rank is from 1 to 32,482 where 1 is most deprived

1,941

Top 6%

Milverton

Warwick

Exhall

Nun & Bed

2,656

Top 9%

Newbold

Rugby

3,082

Top 10%


Cattlemarket

Abbey Nun & Bed 3,210 Abbey Priory Note: National Rank is from 1 to 32,482 where 1 is most deprived

Top 10%



‐ 35 ‐


Appendix Indicators and Domain Weighting used within the Index of Multiple Deprivation 2010 To create the overall Index of Multiple Deprivation, the seven domains must be combined. If they are simply added together this would imply that they had equal importance in the measurement of multiple deprivation. Certain domains are, however, considered to make a greater contribution to the experience of multiple deprivation and for this reason the domains are each weighted according to their perceived importance. In the IMD 2004 and IMD 2007, the overall Index of Multiple Deprivation was constructed by combining the individual domain indices using explicit weights, driven by theoretical considerations and responses to the consultation processes. In the theoretical approach, account is taken of the available research evidence informing the theoretical model of multiple deprivation and weights are selected which reflect this theory. The Income and Employment Deprivation Domains were regarded as the most important contributors to the concept of multiple deprivation and the indicators comprising these domains were very robust. Hence it was decided that they should carry more weight than the other domains. The domain weights were consulted upon and there was broad agreement amongst respondents about the proposed weights. Research into the issue of weighting was carried out by the University of St Andrews (Dibben et al., 2007) and showed broad support for the selected weights. In the light of this and in the context that future Indices were to be constructed in such a way as to replicate (with updated indicators) the previous Indices, the weights

adopted for the IMD 2007 were the same as those used in the IMD 2004. Following further consultation, these weights were retained for the IMD 2010, and are shown in the table below: Table 29: Weights used in the Index of Multiple Deprivation 2010 Domain Weight Income Deprivation Employment Deprivation Health Deprivation and Disability Education, Skills and Training Deprivation Barriers to Housing and Services Crime Living Environment Deprivation

% 22.5% 22.5% 13.5% 13.5% 9.3% 9.3% 9.3%


Income Deprivation Domain •

Adults and children in Income Support families (Source: Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) 2008)

•

Adults and children in Income‐Based Job Seekers Allowance families (Source: DWP 2008)

•

Adults and children in Pension Credit (Guarantee) families (Source: DWP 2008)

•

Adults and children in Child Tax Credit families (who are not claiming Income Support, income‐based Job Seekers Allowance or Pension Credit) whose equivalised income (excluding housing benefits) is below 60 per cent of the median before housing costs (Source: HMRC 2008)

•

Asylum seekers in England in receipt of subsistence support, accommodation support or both (Source: Home Office 2008)


‐ 36 ‐


Employment Deprivation Domain •

Claimants of Jobseeker’s Allowance (both contribution‐based and income‐based): men aged 18‐64 and women aged 18‐59 (Source: DWP 2008)

•

Proportion of young people not staying on in school or non‐advanced education above the age of 16 (2009 Source: HMRC Child Benefit data)

•

Secondary school absence rate (2007/08 and 2008/09, Source: Department for Education) Proportion of those aged under 21 not entering higher education (4 year average, 2005‐2009, Source: Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA))

•

Claimants of Incapacity Benefit: men aged 18‐64 and women aged 18‐59 (Source: DWP 2008)

•

•

Claimants of Severe Disablement Allowance: men aged 18‐64 and women aged 18‐59 (Source: DWP 2008)

Sub‐Domain: Skills

•

Participants in New Deal for 18‐24s who are not claiming Jobseeker’s Allowance (Source: DWP 2008)

•

•

Participants in New Deal for 25+ who are not claiming Jobseeker’s Allowance (Source: DWP 2008)

•

Participants in New Deal for Lone Parents aged 18 and over (after initial interview) (Source: DWP 2008)

Barriers to Housing and Services Domain Sub‐Domain: Wider Barriers

Health Deprivation and Disability Domain •

Years of Potential Life Lost (2004 to 2008, Source: ONS)

•

Comparative Illness and Disability Ratio (2008; Source: DWP)

•

Acute morbidity (2006/07 and 2007/08, Source: Department of Health)

Proportions of working age adults (aged 25‐54) in the area with no or low qualifications (Source: 2001 Census)

•

Household overcrowding (Source: 2001 Census)

•

LA level percentage of households for whom a decision on their application for assistance under the homeless provisions of housing legislation has been made, assigned to the constituent SOAs (Source: Communities and Local Government, 2008/09)

•

Difficulty of Access to owner‐occupation (Source: Family Resources Survey, 2008)

• Mood and anxiety disorders (2008, Source: DWP) Education, Skills and Training Deprivation Domain Sub‐Domain: Children/young people

Sub‐Domain: Geographical Barriers

• • •

Average score of pupils at Key Stage 2 (2006/07 and 2007/08, Source: Department for Education)

•

Road distance to a GP surgery (Source: NHS, 2010)

•

Average test score of pupils at Key Stage 3 (2006/07 and 2007/08, Source: Department for Education)

Road distance to a general stores or supermarket (Source: MapInfo Ltd, 2008)

•

Road distance to a primary school (Source: DfE, 2010)

•

Road distance to a Post Office or sub post office (Source: Post Office Ltd, 2008)

Average capped points score of pupils taking Key Stage 4 (2006/07 and 2007/08, Source: Department for Education)


‐ 37 ‐


Crime Domain •

Burglary (4 recorded crime offence types, Police Force data for 2008, constrained to Crime and Disorder Reduction Partnership (CDRP) level)

•

Theft (5 recorded crime offence types, Police Force data for 2008, constrained to CDRP level)

•

Criminal damage (10 recorded crime offence types, Police Force data for 2008, constrained to CDRP level)

•

Violence (19 recorded crime offence types including Robbery, Police Force data for 2008, constrained to CDRP level)

For more information on the indicators, see the Indices of Multiple Deprivation 2010 Technical Report.


‐ 38 ‐