Q IWA Publishing 2009 Water Science & Technology—WST | 60.11 | 2009
2905
Water resource management for sustainable agriculture in Punjab, India Rajan Aggarwal, Mohinder Kaushal, Samanpreet Kaur and Bhupinder Farmaha
ABSTRACT The state of Punjab comprising 1.5% area of the country has been contributing 40–50% rice and 60–65% wheat to the central pool since last three decades. During last 35 years The area under foodgrains has increased from 39,200 sq km ha to 63,400 sq km and the production of rice and wheat has increased from 0.18 to 0.32 kg/m2 and 0.22 to 0.43 kg/m2 respectively. This change in cropping pattern has increased irrigation water requirement tremendously and the irrigated area has increased from 71 to 95% in the state. Also the number of tube wells has increased
Rajan Aggarwal Mohinder Kaushal Samanpreet Kaur (corresponding author) Bhupinder Farmaha Department of Soil and Water Engineering, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141004, India E-mail:
[email protected]
from 0.192 to 1.165 million in the last 35 years. The excessive indiscriminate exploitation of ground water has created a declining water table situation in the state. The problem is most critical in central Punjab. The average rate of decline over the last few years has been 55 cm per year. The worst affected districts are Moga, Sangrur, Nawanshahar, Ludhiana and Jalandhar. This has resulted in extra power consumption, affects the socio-economic conditions of the small farmers, destroy the ecological balance and adversely affect the sustainable agricultural production and economy of the state. Therefore, in this paper attempt has been made to analyse the problem of declining water table, possible factors responsible for this and suggest suitable strategies for arresting declining water table for sustainable agriculture in Punjab. The strategies include shift of cropping pattern, delay in paddy transplantation, precision irrigation and rainwater harvesting for artificial groundwater recharge. Key words
| sustainability, water demand, water resources
INTRODUCTION Punjab having geographical area of about 50,362 sq km is
to 63,400 sq km and the production of rice and wheat has
divided into 20 districts and is predominantly an agrarian
increased from 0.18 to 0.32 kg/m2 and 0.22 to 0.43 kg/m2
state. Green Revolution has changed the overall scenario of
respectively. This change in cropping pattern has increased
Agriculture in Punjab. As a result of all this the state’s
irrigation water requirement tremendously and the irrigated
contribution in rice, wheat and cotton production at
area has increased from 71 to 96% in the state.
national level is remarkable. The state of Punjab with only 1.6% of the total geographical area of the country, is contributing 40– 50% rice, 60 –65% wheat and 20– 25% cotton to the central pool since last three decades. About 85
CURRENT STATUS OF WATER RESOURCES
per cent of the state’s area is cultivated with cropping
The current status of water resources can be viewed in terms
intensity of more than 186 per cent. During last 35 years
of supplies and demand for water in the state for
The area under foodgrains has increased from 39,200 sq km
agricultural and non-agricultural activities. Based on an
doi: 10.2166/wst.2009.348
R. Aggarwal et al. | Water resource management for sustainable agriculture in Punjab
2906
Table 1
|
Water Science & Technology—WST | 60.11 | 2009
being over-exploited using shallow and deep tube wells in
Water resources of Punjab
the state, the number of which has swelled from a mere
Source
Water available (M m3)
Canal water (Headworks)
17,900
The latest study of groundwater balance estimates (Table 2)
Canal water (Outlet)
14,500
shows that out of 137 development blocks, 103 fall in ‘over
Groundwater
16,800
exploited’ category having groundwater extraction more than
Annual available water
31,300
100% of annual replenishment, 5 are classified as critical
Annual water demand
44,000
(stage of development 90– 100%), 4 are ‘Semi-Critical’
Deficit
12,700
having stage of development between 70 and 90% and 25
0.192 million in 1970 to 1.193 million at present in the state
in ‘Safe’ category having groundwater draft less than 70% of
Source: Directorate of Water Resources and Environment, Punjab.
annual recharge. Block Nihalsinghwala in Moga district for assessment by the Directorate of Water Resources of
example has the maximum stage of development of more
Irrigation Department of Punjab, total surface water
than 200%. Safe blocks lie in southwest Punjab where
3
available at different headworks is about 17,900 M m . Of
groundwater is of poor quality and in Kandi area where
these, 14,500 M m3 is available at the outlet. Prihar et al.
extraction is restricted due to deeper ground water aquifers.
(1993) estimated the groundwater contribution from rainfall
The water level depth data of monitoring network
and seepage from canals as 16,800 M m3 thus making the
(Directorate of Water Resources and Environment, Punjab)
total availability of water as 31,300 M m3 (Anonymous
also reveals that in 44 percent of the state’s geographical
2002). The crop water demand has been worked out as
area, water table is beyond the critical level of 10 m. The
3
3
44,000 M m thus leaving an annual deficit of 12,700 M m
area having water table depth below 10 m depth has
(Table 1). In order to meet crop demand the ground water is
increased from a mere 3 percent in 1973 to 53 percent in
Table 2
|
District wise categorization of blocks
S. No.
District
Safe
Semi-critical
Overexploited-critical
Total no. of blocks
1.
Amritsar
0
0
16
16
2.
Sangrur
0
0
12
12
3.
Patiala
0
0
8
8
4.
Ropar
4
0
2 þ 1
7
5.
Muktsar
4
0
0
4
6.
Nawanshahr
2
0
3
5
7.
Mansa
0
0
5
5
8.
Moga
0
0
5
5
9.
Kapurthala
0
0
5
5
10.
Ludhiana
0
0
10 þ 1
11
11.
Faridkot
0
0
2
2
12.
Fatehgarh
0
1
5
6
13.
Ferozepur
2
0
7 þ 1
10
14.
Jalandhar
0
0
10
10
15.
Bhatinda
3
0
4
7
16.
Gurdaspur
4
1
7 þ 2
14
17.
Hoshiarpur
6
2
2
10
Total
25
4
103 þ 5 ¼ 108
137
Source: Directorate of Water Resources and Environment, Punjab.
R. Aggarwal et al. | Water resource management for sustainable agriculture in Punjab
2907
Water Science & Technology—WST | 60.11 | 2009
4. Declining trend of rainfall: As compared to long time average annual rainfall for 30 years (1970– 1999) which is 606 mm, it has now come down to 400 mm for the 5 year block period of 2000 – 2004, a significant reduction of 200 mm. Another feature of the storms during this period has been a greater number of high intensity short duration storms (which generate more surface runoff) rather than low intensity long duration storms which induce increased recharge. The net result has been that natural recharge has decreased (Figure 2). 5. Decrease in canal irrigated area: The percent net area irrigated by canals has decreased from 45 per cent in Figure 1
|
Progressive growth of tubewells in Punjab.
1970 – 71 to only 25 percent in 2001– 02 with the result that dependency on ground water has increased tremen-
2000. The long term fall of water table for 1984 –2002
dously to meet food production targets (Figure 3).
reveals that water table has fallen in about 80% of the state’
6. Lack of proper planning of systematic groundwater
geographical area (Takshi & Chopra 2004). Up to 1995, the
extraction: Over exploitation of groundwater has been
average fall of water table in Punjab was about 23 cm per
taking place to meet the increased demand of irrigation
year (Khepar et al. 2000) which during the next 6 years
water for crop production, industrial and domestic
(1997 – 2003) increased to 53 cm per year (Hira et al. 2001) and is currently about 70 cm per year.
sectors because of property-based rights. 7. Overall increase in water demand: To meet the increasing demand of industrial and domestic sector, groundwater extraction has been on the rise.
REASONS FOR DECLINING TREND OF WATER TABLE The present groundwater scenario is because of the following reasons.
FORECAST OF GROUNDWATER BEHAVIOR
1. Change in cropping pattern: The Punjab farmers shifted
Considering the present trend of fall in water table, the
from low water consuming crops to high water requiring
future projections are quite disturbing. It is estimated that
paddy crop like irrespective of the soil conditions. There
by the year 2020, more than 30 percent of the state’s
has been a drastic increase in area under paddy from
additional area would be clubbed to the area where water
4,000 sq km in 1971 to 26,000 sq km in 2004. Paddy consumes 62 per cent and wheat 20 per cent of total irrigation water requirement and, water use of paddy crop is maximum i.e. 3 cubic metres per kg of output. 2. Increase in area under irrigation: Net area under irrigation has increased from 70 per cent in 1970 –71 to 96 percent in 2004 –05. Also, there is an increase in cropping intensity from 124 to 186 per cent resulting in an increased abstraction of ground water over the years. 3. Increase in number of tubewells: Number of tubewells has increased from 0.192 million in 1971 to 1.193 million in 2006. This has resulted into excessive over exploitation of groundwater (Figure 1).
Figure 2
|
Average annual rainfall in Punjab.
R. Aggarwal et al. | Water resource management for sustainable agriculture in Punjab
2908
Figure 3
|
Water Science & Technology—WST | 60.11 | 2009
Net irrigated area by different sources in Punjab.
level is already beyond the critical level of 10 meter depth
losses. Conveyance losses can also be avoided by using
(Takshi & Chopra 2004). As compared to the year 2001, the
under ground pipeline system where the water is conveyed
water table in central Punjab will fall by 14% in 2005, 34%
in a pipeline. Till date, 12,872 km of pipeline has been laid
in 2010 and by the year 2010, entire central Punjab will
in Punjab state benefiting an area of 4,752.82 sq km.
have water table depth beyond 14 m (Hira et al. 2001). Reduction in application losses
MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES The water resources in the state of Punjab can be managed by saving irrigation water using water saving techniques and by augmenting the ground water resources through artificial recharge techniques.
Proper selection of an irrigation method for a particular crop is very important to achieve higher application efficiency. For example, the replacement of border method of irrigation with furrow method of irrigation in wide- row crops like cotton, sunflower and maize save water. Precision laser land leveling technology saves costly inputs like fertilizers, improve crop stand, and increases
Water saving techniques Improvement in irrigation efficiencies
yield by about 15 percent. Laser leveling saves irrigation water by about 25 percent in comparison with non-lasered fields and reduces labor cost.
Average irrigation efficiency of irrigation systems, at
For efficient application of irrigation water the optimum
present, is very low ranging from 30 to 40 per cent. Water
plot size for different soil type, field slopes, stream size
is lost during conveyance through seepage from main canal,
should be adopted as given in Table 3.
branches, distributaries, minors, water courses and field channels. The average water losses from unlined canals, branches and distributaries, and water courses are 8, 17, 20
Improved irrigation methods
percent respectively, of water released from reservoir (Singh
Pressurized irrigation systems (sprinkler and drip) have the
1978). Lining is an effective way of minimizing conveyance
potential to increase irrigation water use efficiency as high
R. Aggarwal et al. | Water resource management for sustainable agriculture in Punjab
2909
Table 3
|
Water Science & Technology—WST | 60.11 | 2009
Recommended plot sizes under different soil types, slopes and discharges in one acre length Number of border strips for different discharges (m3/hr)
Soil type
Average slope (%)
27 –36
54
72
108
162
216
Light
0.3
17 – 18
14– 15
12– 13
9 – 10
6–7
4–5
0.4
15 – 16
13– 14
10– 11
7–8
5–6
0.5
13 –14
11– 12
9–10
6–7
4–5
0.2
12 – 13
9 – 10
6–7
4–5
0.3
10 – 11
7–8
5–6
Medium
Heavy
0.4
8–9
6–7
4–5
0.05
9 – 10
6–7
4–5
0.15
7–8
5–6
0.25
6–7
4–5
as 75 – 90 percent. For example, irrigation applications in
followed by 2 days of drying can result in 25% saving of
furrow in wide row crops like sugarcane, cotton, sunflower
water. Also shifting the date of transplanting of paddy from
and maize save water without any yield reduction. Singh
first week of May to third week of June checks the water
et al. (1995) reported a saving of 100 – 170 mm of water in
table decline by 70 cm without any adverse effect on the
cotton compared to flood irrigation without any yield loss.
yield (Hira et al. 2001).
Table 4 shows the yield gain and water saving of important
It has been recommended that for maximum rainfall
crops under drip irrigation. The Punjab Government is
conservation point of view, the optimum effective dike
providing high subsidy to its large scale adoption.
height in paddy fields should be 15, 17.5 and 22.5 cm for light, medium and heavy soils respectively.
Water saving in paddy Paddy in Punjab is sown in an area of about 26,000 sq km.
Zero tillage technology
Proper scheduling of irrigation (amount and timing) to
Use of zero-till drill on one sq km of land is estimated to
crops is an important component of water saving technol-
save 6 – 7 m3 of diesel and approximately 0.1 M m3 of
ogies. Intermittent irrigation in paddy i.e. 15 days ponding
irrigation water. Adoption of zero till practices over an
Table 4
|
Yield gain and water saving of important crops under drip irrigation
Crop
Saving in water (%)
Increase in yield (%)
Sunflower
52
–
Maize
53
11
Chilli
53
–
Cauliflower
63
29
Potato
38
38
Tomato
23
42
Pea
41
56
Bottle gourd
50
36.5
Carrot
47.6
15
Sugarcane
17.6
18.7
Brinjal
43.7
32
Source: Department of Soil and Water Engineering PAU, Ludhiana.
area of 5,000 sq km could increase wheat production by 2 billion kg, and also save 5 billion cubic metres of water and 0.5 millions cubic metres of diesel each year.
Bed planting Bed planting of wheat results irrigation water savings ranging from 18 to 25 percent as compared with the conventional tilled wheat (Hossain et al. 2001; Talukder et al. 2002; Hobbs & Gupta 2003).
Mulching Application of straw mulch improves the water use efficiency and helps in water saving by reducing the ET losses (Jalota et al. 2000) and increased yields of number of
R. Aggarwal et al. | Water resource management for sustainable agriculture in Punjab
2910
Water Science & Technology—WST | 60.11 | 2009
field crops during summer months (Singh et al. 1995). The
structures, the water table which was falling in Hoshiarpur
few reports on the effect of mulching on water use in RW
district has resulted in an average rise of 5.9 cm per year. Anonymous (2004) while working on an ad hoc project
systems refer to mulching of wheat, and suggest that sufficient water is saved (25 –100 mm) to reduce the
on artificial ground water recharge techniques for Kandi
number of irrigations by one or irrigation time by an
area of Punjab has emphasized that monsoon rainfall in
average of 17 percent in water limiting situations (Zaman &
Kandi area should be recharged by constructing check
Choudhuri 1995).
dams on natural streams coupled with infiltration galleries to a tubewell for artificial groundwater recharge.
Crop diversification Increasing ground water recharge Replacing rice with less water guzzling crops like maize, soybean, groundnut and pulses etc. could save substantial quantities of water as depicted in Table 5. This has been recommended by the Johal Committee on crop diversification but needs to be implemented in letter and spirit to
A number of studies in recent years bring out the possibilities of promoting greater recharge of aquifers with surplus runoff available during the rainy season through spreading or by injection through wells. Using the available network of surface drains is one such possibility. The
retrieve the situation on water front.
recharge capacity of the drains can also be increased substantially by installation of series of recharge shafts in Replacement of long duration crop varieties Long duration varieties of rice results in increased crop water requirement. Emphasis need to be given on short duration varieties and superior quality basmati, having lesser water requirement.
case of drain is underlain by comparatively more impervious strata. Khepar et al. (2002) developed a strategy to determine the optimum number of check structures for enhancing the groundwater recharge using surface runoff and surplus canal water.
Roof top rainwater harvesting Augmenting water resources
Roof top rainwater is the purest form of water before it joins the surface runoff. If this could be tapped for artificial
Recharge in Kandi area
ground water recharge, this would help in checking
Kandi area experiences more than 1,000 mm of annual
the ground water decline besides improving the quality of
rainfall, out of which 40 per cent goes as runoff during the
ground water; reduce the load on sewage system, save the
rainy season. There are about 120 small water harvesting
roads and streets from possible damage and health hazards.
structures (WHS) in the Shivaliks foothills under different
There is a potential of 32.2 and 70.8 M m3 (Aggarwal 2007)
watershed programmes. It has been conclusively established
of rooftop rainwater for being tapped for ground water
by Khepar et al. (2000) that due to the impact of these
recharge in urban and rural areas respectively.
Table 5
|
Crop diversification
Option: Replacement of rice with Irrigation water demand (rice 5 73 cm) Crop
Area (km2)
Maize
With alternative (cm)
Water saved (Mm3)
2,500
60
325
Groundnut
500
50
115
Soybean
500
60
65
Pulses
500
45
150
2911
R. Aggarwal et al. | Water resource management for sustainable agriculture in Punjab
Renovation of village ponds There are about 13,000 village ponds out of a total of 23,000 in Punjab which could be used for providing irrigation after renovation. The water stored therein would thus reduce the ground water withdrawal by about 6 cm per year.
CONCLUSIONS Keeping in view the present scenario, there is urgent need to shift at least 5 – 10% of the area under paddy crop, adopt efficient water management practices and adopt groundwater augmenting techniques on mass scale for sustainability of agriculture.
REFERENCES Aggarwal, R. 2007 Scope of Rainwater harvesting through Rooftop in Punjab. Paper presented in Conference on “Environmental and Livelihood Security Through Resource Management in Northern India” organized by Indian association of Soil and Water Conservationists, Dehradun at Chandigarh. Anonymous 2002 Agriculture Production Pattern Adjustment Programme in Punjab for Productivity and Growth. A Report to the Government of Punjab, Chief Minister’s Advisory Committee on Agriculture Policy and Restructuring, Oct. 2002. p. 123. Anonymous 2004 Studies on Artificial Recharge Techniques for Kandi Area. Project Report of ICAR—Adhoc Project. Hira, G. S., Jalota, S. K. & Arora, V. K. 2001 Efficient Management of Water Resources for Sustainable Cropping in Punjab. Research Bulletin, Department of Soils, PAU, Ludhiana. Hobbs, P. R. & Gupta, R. K. 2003 Rice-wheat cropping systems in the Indo-Gangetic Plains: issues of water productivity in relation to new resource-conserving technologies. In: Kijne, J. W., Barker, R. & Molden, D. (eds) Water Productivity in Agriculture: Limits and Opportunities for Improvement. CABI, Wallingford.
Water Science & Technology—WST | 60.11 | 2009
Hossain, M. I., Talukder, A. S. M. H. M., Sufian, M. A., Hossain, A. B. S. & Meisner, C. A. 2001 Performance of bed planting and nitrogen fertilizer under rice-wheat-mungbean cropping systems in Bangladesh. www.cimmyt.org/bangladesh Jalota, S. K., Arora, V. K. & Singh, O. 2000 Development and evaluation of a soil water evaporation model to assess the effects of soil texture, tillage and crop residue management under field conditions. Soil Use Manage. 16, 194– 199. Khepar, S. D., Sondhi, S. K., Chawla, J. K. & Singh, M. 2000 Impact of soil and water conservation works on ground water regime in Kandi Area of Punjab. J. Soil Water Conserv. 45(1 –20), 41 –49. Khepar, S. D., Yadav, A. K., Sondhi, S. K., Siag, M. & Chawla, J. K. 2002 Optimum number of check structures for enhancing ground water recharge through surface drainage using surplus canal water—a case study. I.E.(I) Journal—AG 83, 16 – 19. Prihar, S. S., Khepar, S. D., Singh, R., Grewal, S. S. & Sondhi, S. K. 1993 Water resources of Punjab: a critical concern for the future of its agriculture. Bulletin, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana. p. 54. Singh, G. 1978 Ground water recharge from canals and other water conveyance systems, stream flow and aquifer storage. Proc. Nat. Symp. Land and Water Manage. In the Indus Basin (India). Ludhiana: Punjab Agric. Univ. Vol. 1, pp. 79 –86. Singh, B., Chhibba, I. M. & Brar, J. S. 1995 Salient research findings of practical utility. Department of Soils. Ludhiana: Punjab Agricultural University. Talukder, A. S. M. H. M., Sufian, M. A., Meisner, C. A., Duxbury, J. M., Lauren, J. G. & Hossain, A. B. S. 2002 Enhancing food security in warmer areas through permanent raised-bed in wheat: save water and reduce global warming. Poster paper at 2nd International Group Meeting on ‘Wheat Technologies for Warmer Areas’, Agharkar Research Institute, Pune, India, 23 –26 September 2002. www.cimmyt.org/bangladesh/ Takshi, K. S. & Chopra, R. P. S. 2004 Monitoring and assessment of groundwater resources in Punjab State. 2004. Proceedings of workshop on Groundwater use in North-west India. Centre for Advancement of Sustainable agriculture, New Delhi. pp. 8 –15. Zaman, A. & Choudhuri, S. K. 1995 Water use and yield of wheat under unmulched and mulched conditions in laterite soil of the Indian sub-continent. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 175, 349– 353.