Wig-1, a new p53-induced gene encoding a zinc finger protein - Nature

5 downloads 0 Views 378KB Size Report
We thank Bert Vogelstein, Johns Hopkins Oncology. Center, for the mouse p21WAF1. cDNA, Philip Leder,. Harvard Medical School, for the p217/7 mouse fibro-.
Oncogene (1997) 15, 2699 ± 2704  1997 Stockton Press All rights reserved 0950 ± 9232/97 $12.00

Wig-1, a new p53-induced gene encoding a zinc ®nger protein Shohreh Varmeh-Ziaie1, Ismail Okan1, Yisong Wang1,3, Kristinn P Magnusson1, Peter Warthoe2, Michael Strauss2 and Klas G Wiman1 1

Microbiology and Tumor Biology Center (MTC), Karolinska Institute, S-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden; 2Danish Cancer Society, Division for Cancer Biology, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark

Wild type p53 expressed from a temperature-sensitive (ts p53) construct induces both G1 cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in the p53-negative J3D mouse T lymphoma line (Wang et al., 1995). Using di€erential display analysis, we have identi®ed one new p53-induced gene, wig-1 (for wild type p53-induced gene 1), whose 7.6 kb and 2.2 kb transcripts are upregulated in ts p53transfected J3D cells following induction of wild type p53 expression by temperature shift to 328C. The wig-1 transcripts were also induced in irradiated NIH3T3 and p217/7 ®broblasts but not in irradiated p537/7 ®broblasts. Whole body gamma irradiation caused induction of both wig-1 transcripts in mouse brain, testis, kidney, spleen and lung. A basal wig-1 expression was detected in brain, testis and kidney. The WIG-1 protein contains three zinc ®nger motifs and a putative nuclear localization signal. Keywords: p53; di€erential display; zinc ®nger protein

Introduction The p53 tumor suppressor protein is an unstable protein expressed at low levels in most normal cells and tissues. Overexpression of wild type p53 in response to DNA damage or certain other types of cellular stress, or reconstitution of wild type p53 expression in tumor cells lacking wild type p53, inhibits cell growth by triggering cell cycle arrest and/or cell death by apoptosis, depending on various factors including cell type and presence of growth factors (Kastan et al., 1991; Martinez et al., 1991; Yonish-Rouach et al., 1991; Kuerbitz et al., 1992; Wang et al., 1993; Canman et al., 1995). In addition to its role as regulator of cell cycle progression and cell survival, p53 has also been implicated in various other biological processes, e.g. DNA replication and repair, di€erentiation and development (reviewed by Ko and Prives, 1996). p53 binds DNA in a sequence-speci®c manner and transactivates transcription of genes with speci®c p53 DNA binding sites in their promoters. The sequencespeci®c transactivation function of p53 has been shown to be essential for p53-mediated growth inhibition in vitro (Pietenpol et al., 1994). Most naturally occurring mutant p53 proteins carry amino acid substitutions in the core domain that harbors the sequence-speci®c DNA binding activity, and usually have reduced or no

Correspondence: KG Wiman 3 Present address: Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada M5G 1X5 Received 20 March 1997; revised 24 July 1997; accepted 24 July 1997

sequence-speci®c DNA binding and transactivation activity (reviewed by Ko and Prives, 1996). These observations support the idea that sequence-speci®c DNA binding and transactivation are crucial for the tumor suppressor activity of p53. p53-induced G1 cell cycle arrest is to a large extent mediated by transactivation of the cyclin/cyclindependent kinase inhibitor p21WAF1 (Waldman et al., 1995). In contrast, the molecular mechanisms by which p53 induces apoptosis remain obscure. It is controversial whether or not transcriptional transactivation is essential for p53-induced apoptosis (Caelles et al., 1994; Haupt et al., 1995; Sabbatini et al., 1995). Among the known p53-induced genes, bax and Fas/ APO-1 are associated with apoptosis (Miyashita and Reed 1995; Owen-Schaub et al., 1995). Thymocytes from bax-de®cient mice show a normal p53-dependent apoptotic response to DNA damage, demonstrating that bax is not essential for this process (Knudson et al., 1995). However, recent studies of bax-de®cient mice carrying a truncated SV40 large T that inactivates RB but not p53 have indicated that bax indeed is an important downstream e€ector of p53-induced apoptosis and p53-mediated tumor suppression, although not sucient for a full p53-mediated response (Yin et al., 1997). These and other results suggest that p53induced apoptosis may involve transactivation or downregulation of as yet unidenti®ed p53-responsive genes. Similarly, the function of p53 in processes such as di€erentiation and development may depend on regulation of speci®c genes. The identi®cation of new p53-regulated genes should thus provide a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying p53-induced biological pathways. In order to identify such genes, we have used the PCRbased di€erential display technique to identify mRNAs induced by wild type p53 expressed from the temperature-sensitive Val-135 mouse mutant p53 construct (ts p53) in J3D mouse T lymphoma cells. At 378C, the ts p53 construct is expressed as mutant p53. Temperature shift to 328C induces wild type p53 expression, and is followed by both G1 cell cycle arrest and apoptosis (Wang et al., 1993, 1995). Here we describe the identi®cation and characteristics of a novel p53-induced gene, wig-1 (for wild-type p53-induced gene 1), that encodes a zinc ®nger protein of unknown function.

Results Identi®cation of p53-regulated genes by di€erential display In order to identify novel genes regulated by wild type p53 in J3D-ts p53 cells, RNA was isolated from J3D-

New p53-induced zinc finger protein S Varmeh-Ziaie et al

ts p53 cells and J3D-neo cells grown at 378C, and from the same cells 8 h after a temperature shift to 328C. cDNA was synthesized and ampli®ed using the primers and conditions described in Materials and methods. Ampli®ed cDNA from the four cell populations was compared on denaturing sequencing gels, and the di€erentially expressed bands were isolated. We identi®ed nine bands that were upregulated and four bands that were downregulated. One of the bands that were strongly induced by wild type p53 was selected for further analysis (Figure 1, left panel). The cloning and characterization of the remaining di€erentially expressed cDNAs will be described elsewhere. After reampli®cation and subcloning, the selected cDNA was used as probe in Northern blot analysis of RNA from the four J3D cell populations. The selected 280 bp cDNA fragment hybridized with an RNA of approximately 8 kb in J3D-ts p53 cells grown at 328C but not in J3D-ts p53 cells grown at 378C (Figure 1, right panel), con®rming that the mRNA corresponding to this fragment is induced by wild type p53 in these cells. DNA sequence analysis and a search through the Genbank did not reveal any signi®cant homology with any known gene. The gene corresponding to this di€erentially expressed fragment was designated wig-1, for wild type p53-induced gene 1. Isolation of full length wig-1 cDNA Full length wig-1 cDNA was cloned using Marathon cDNA ampli®cation. The cloning strategy is shown in Figure 2. Since location of the di€erentially expressed 280 bp fragment in the transcript was unknown, we designed four primers from the sequence of this fragment. One of these primers, P1, generated a 3 kb PCR product in combination with Anchor primer 1. Cloning and sequencing of this fragment revealed that the 280 bp di€erential display fragment was located 3 kb from the poly A tail of the transcript. Another

32°C

J3D-ts p53 37°C

32°C

J3D-ts p53 37°C

2700

primer, P2, and Anchor primer 1 produced a 2 kb PCR fragment located 5' of P2. An additional 3 kb of the cDNA located 5' of the 2 kb fragment, were cloned using a speci®c cDNA primer to synthesize ®rst strand cDNA. A primary PCR ampli®cation was peformed using primer P3 and Anchor primer 1. The subsequent nested PCR was carried out using a dilution of the ®rst PCR reaction and primer P4 and Anchor primer 2 (Figure 2). Characteristics of wig-1 cDNA and protein The ®rst 1046 nucleotides of the cloned 7661 nt wig-1 cDNA are shown in Figure 3. The wig-1 cDNA has a GC-rich 5' untranslated region of 173 nt. The most 5' ATG codon at position 152 is followed by an open reading frame of 18 codons and a stop codon. A second ATG codon at position 174 represents the start of an open reading frame of 870 nt, encoding a 290 amino acid protein with a predicted molecular weight of 32 kDa. In vitro transcription and translation of wig-1 cDNA produced a protein with an apparent molecular weight of 32 kDa, indicating that the second ATG codon is used for initiation of translation (data not shown). Three putative polyadenylation signals (AATAAA) are located at nucleotide poitions 2215, 7500 and 7635 (not shown). The WIG-1 protein has three Cys2-His2 zinc ®nger motifs, extending from amino acid residue 72 ± 94, 150 ± 172 and 248 ± 270, respectively. The two Nterminal zinc ®nger sequences show strong homology to each other (Figure 4). The regions between the two cysteines and the two histidines are invariant, whereas the region between the paired cysteines and histidines has two invariant alanines, one serine, and one glutamine. The third zinc ®nger motif (residues 248 ± 270) does not show any striking homology to the other two zinc ®nger motifs, except that the cysteines and histidines are conserved. Each zinc ®nger motif is followed by several basic amino acids. An acidic region is located adjacent to the ®rst zinc ®nger motif, between amino acid 42 and 65, and a basic region between amino acid residues 195 and 211 contains a potential bipartite nuclear localization signal (Robbins et al., 1991). A search through the protein sequence

Wig-1 7.6 kb 280 bp 28 S

GAPDH Figure 1 Identi®cation of wig-1 by PCR-based semi-quantitative di€erential display. Left panel: Analysis of di€erentially expressed PCR products on a 6% DNA sequence gel, using RNA isolated from J3D-ts p53 cells grown at 378C (left lane) or J3D-ts p53 cells incubated 8 h at 328C (right lane). The 280 bp fragment is marked by an arrow. Right panel: Northern blot analysis using the 280 kb DNA fragment as probe. GAPDH was used as control probe. RNA was isolated from J3D-ts p53 cells grown at 378C (left lane) or J3D-ts p53 cells incubated 8 h at 328C (right lane). The 7.6 kb hybridizing band, the 28 S ribosomal RNA, and the GAPDH mRNA are indicated by arrows

Figure 2 Schematic representation of the cloning of wig-1 using PCR-based Marathon ampli®cation (Clontech, CA). The 280 bp fragment, indicated by the ®lled box, was used to design Primer 1 (P1). The full-length cDNA was cloned in three steps (see Materials and methods). The 3' 3 kb fragment was PCR ampli®ed using P1 and Anchor primer 1 (AP1). The middle 2 kb fragment was PCR ampli®ed using Primer 2 (P2) and AP1. The 5' 3 kb fragment was ampli®ed by a nested PCR, using a combination of Primer 3 (P3) and AP1 in the ®rst 14 cycles, followed by a 27 cycle PCR ampli®cation using nested Primer 4 (P4) and Anchor primer 2 (AP2). The wig-1 coding sequence is indicated by the open box

New p53-induced zinc finger protein S Varmeh-Ziaie et al

database revealed a 21% homology between WIG-1 and YO14-CAEEL (accession number P34670), a hypothetical zinc ®nger nuclear protein in C. elegans. The zinc ®nger motifs of wig-1 showed 20 ± 50% homology to many known zinc ®nger-containing transcription factors and DNA binding proteins. No

other signi®cant homologies to known proteins were found. Southern blot analysis using the coding region of wig-1 cDNA as probe demonstrated that wig-1 is a single copy gene in the mouse (not shown). The same probe gave rise to a speci®c hybridization pattern with human placenta DNA, indicating that wig-1 has a human homolog (not shown). p53-dependent regulation of wig-1 mRNA expression

J3D-ts p53 37°C

J3D-neo 32°C

Figure 3 The ®rst 1046 nucleotides and predicted amino acid sequence of wig-1 cDNA. The longest open reading frame begins with the ATG at nucleotide 174 and ends with the stop codon at nucleotide 1044. The three zinc ®nger motifs are indicated by solid lines and the potential nuclear localization signal is indicated by the dotted line. The numbers to the left refer to nucleotide positions and those to the right to amino acid positions. The GenBank accession number for wig-1 is AF012923

J3D-neo 37°C

The kinetics of the induction of wig-1 expression in J3D-ts p53 and J3D-neo cells following temperature shift to 328C was analysed by Northern blotting (Figure 5). Using the wig-1 coding region as probe, two wig-1 transcripts of 7.6 kb and 2.2 kb were detected. In contrast, the 280 bp fragment obtained by di€erential display analysis and located 3 kb from the poly A tail detected only the 7.6 kb transcript (Figure 1). This con®rms that the 2.2 kb transcript arises due to termination of transcription and polyadenylation using the poly-adenylation signal located at nucleotide position 2215. Both wig-1 mRNAs were induced at 2 h after temperature shift, reached a peak expression level at 8 h and were still expressed at high levels at 24 h after temperature shift. Similar kinetics of induction were observed for p21WAF1 (Figure 5). Since p53 protein levels are induced in response to DNA damage (Kastan et al., 1991), we tested whether wig-1 expression was induced following treatment with a DNA damaging agent in a p53-dependent manner. Wig-1 mRNA levels were examined in two di€erent wild type p53-carrying cells, NIH3T3 cells and p21 null mouse ®broblasts, and in p53 null mouse ®broblasts, before and after exposure to gamma irradiation (6 Gy). Total RNA was isolated 2, 4 and 6 h following irradiation and analysed by Northern blotting. Prior to irradiation, wig-1 was expressed at low but detectable levels in NIH3T3 cells and mouse p217/7 ®broblasts carrying wild type p53 (Figure 6, upper and middle panels). Both wig-1 transcripts were induced 2 h after irradiation, and reached a peak level of expression 4 h after irradiation in both NIH3T3

J3D-ts p53 32°C 1

2

4

6

8 12 16 24 h

Wig-1 7.6 kb Wig-1 2.2 kb p21WAF1 GAPDH Figure 4 Comparison of the amino acid sequences of the three zinc ®nger motifs in the WIG-1 protein. Amino acid positions are indicated. Identical residues are marked by vertical lines. The strong internal homology between the two N-terminal zinc ®nger domains suggests that these domains have arisen through internal gene duplication

Figure 5 Kinetics of induction of wig-1 mRNA by wild type p53. Total RNA was isolated from J3D-neo cells grown at 378C or incubated 8 h at 328C, and from J3D-ts p53 grown at 378C or incubated at 328C for the indicated time periods. The Northern ®lter was hybridized with probes corresponding to the coding sequences of wig-1, p21WAF1 and GAPDH. The wig-1, p21WAF1 and GAPDH mRNAs are indicated by arrows

2701

New p53-induced zinc finger protein S Varmeh-Ziaie et al

2702

cells and p217/7 ®broblasts. Densitometric analysis revealed a tenfold induction of the 7.6 kb wig-1 mRNA 4 h after irradiation of NIH3T3 cells. The 2.2 kb wig-1 mRNA species showed a somewhat lower induction in both cell types. Similar kinetics of induction following irradiation was observed for p21WAF1 in NIH3T3 cells, except that the level of induction was approximately twice that of wig-1 (data not shown). In contrast, unirradiated p53 null ®broblasts expressed minute levels of wig-1 mRNA that were only detected after long exposure (Figure 6, lower panel). No increased wig-1 expression was observed in these cells after irradiation (with the GAPDH signal taken into account). Thus, although wig-1 is expressed at low levels even in the absence of p53, wig-1 induction in response to gamma irradiation is p53-dependent. Next we examined the expression of wig-1 in various mouse tissues before and after whole body gamma irradiation (5 Gy). RNA was prepared from the tissues indicated in Figure 7 and analysed by Northern blotting. Both wig-1 transcripts were expressed in brain and testis of unirradiated animals. Low levels of wig-1 mRNA were also detected in unirradiated kidney after long exposure of the Northern ®lter (not shown). Wig-1 mRNA was not detected in the other tissues examined. Following irradiation, wig-1 was strongly induced in kidney, lungs and spleen. Brain and testis expressed even higher wig-1 mRNA levels

– NIH3T3

2

4

6h Wig-1 7.6 kb

Wig-1 2.2 kb GAPDH

p21–/– Wig-1 7.6 kb

Wig-1 2.2 kb

after irradiation. No wig-1 induction after irradiation was observed in liver (Figure 7). Discussion Our previous studies have shown that induction of wild type p53 expression in J3D-ts p53 cells by temperature shift to 328C causes induction of the p53-responsive genes p21WAF1, MDM2, and bax from low or undetectable levels within 8 h (Wang et al., 1995). This system therefore seemed ideal for the identification of new p53-induced genes using di€erential display. By analysing RNA from cells harvested 8 h following temperature shift to 328C, we expected to identify new genes directly induced by wild type p53. Indeed, kinetic analyses demonstrated increased wig-1 mRNA levels already 2 h following induction of wild type p53 expression by temperature shift to 328C, and peak levels of expression 8 h after temperature shift. These kinetics of induction are comparable to those of the direct response genes p21WAF1 and MDM2 in the same cells, consistent with possibility that wig-1 is directly transactivated by wild type p53. However, we cannot exclude that the p53-dependent induction of wig-1 is indirect. The identi®cation of p53-binding sites in the wig-1 promoter is required to resolve this question. The synthesis of a 32 kDa protein in cell-free translation argues that the second ATG codon is used as initiation codon for translation of WIG-1 protein. The prescence of an ATG codon upstream of the ATG initiation codon is not unique to wig-1 (Hunt, 1985). Nevertheless, it cannot be ruled out that the 18 codon open reading frame is expressed and that it a€ects translation of the second longer open reading frame. It will be interesting to compare wig-1 cDNAs from di€erent species to see whether the short 5' open reading frame is conserved. Two wig-1 mRNA species of approximately 7.6 kb and 2.2 kb were detected by Northern blotting, whereas DNA sequencing revealed three alternative polyadenylation signals at nucleotide positions 2215, 7500 and 7635. The larger of the two wig-1 hybridizing bands detected by Northern blotting may represent two mRNA species, terminated using the polyadenylation signals at nucleotide positions 7500 and 7635, respectively, or one of these mRNA species. All three wig-1 mRNAs should

GAPDH

p53–/–

Liver Brain Kidney Testis Lung Spleen + – + – + – + – + – + –

Wig-1 7.6 kb Wig-1 2.2 kb

Wig-1 7.6 kb Wig-1 2.2 kb

GAPDH Figure 6 Induction of wig-1 mRNA expression by gamma irradiation. Total RNA was isolated from NIH3T3 cells (upper panel), and from p217/7 (middle panel), and p537/7 (lower panel) mouse ®broblasts before and 6 h after 6 Gy gamma irradiation. The Northern ®lters were hybridized with the wig-1 and GAPDH probes. A longer exposure of the Northern ®lter containing RNA from p537/7 mouse ®broblasts (lower panel) was required in order to detect the weak wig-1 signal. The wig-1 and GAPDH mRNAs are indicated by the arrows

GAPDH

Figure 7 Wig-1 mRNA expression in normal mouse tissues before (7) and 5 h after (+) 5 Gy whole body gamma irradiation. Total RNA was isolated from the indicated tissues and hybridized with wig-1 and GAPDH probes. The wig-1 and GAPDH mRNAs are indicated by arrows

New p53-induced zinc finger protein S Varmeh-Ziaie et al

have the same coding potential. The signi®cance, if any, of the presence of these di€erent mRNAs is unclear. Again, analyses of wig-1 homologs in other species will indicate whether the expression of the di€erent wig-1 transcripts is conserved. Our experiments revealed a signi®cant induction of both wig-1 transcripts in response to DNA damage in cells carrying wild type p53 but not in p537/7 ®broblasts, clearly demonstrating that wig-1 is induced in a p53-dependent manner. The observation that all three cell types expressed wig-1 prior to irradiation indicates that basal wig-1 expression is controlled in a p53-independent fashion. However, wig-1 levels prior to irradiation were higher in NIH3T3 cells and p217/7 mouse ®broblasts than in p53 null ®broblasts, suggesting that the low levels of p53 protein present in unirradiated NIH3T3 cells and p21 null ®broblasts are able to stimulate wig-1 expression above the p53independent levels. The relatively high levels of wig-1 expression detected in brain and testis may re¯ect the presence of sucient amounts of active p53 protein in these tissues, at least in certain subpopulations of cells, or perhaps more likely, may be due to transactivation of wig-1 by p53-independent mechanisms. In any case, the expression of wig-1 in unirradiated brain and testis indicates a speci®c function for wig-1 in these tissues. The induction of wig-1 expression in kidney, lung and spleen upon whole body irradiation is consistent with the previously reported induction of p53 in these tissues after whole body irradiation (MacCallum et al., 1996). Likewise, the lack of wig-1 induction in liver is consistent with the observation that p53 does not accumulate in this tissue after irradiation according to immunohistochemistry. Thus, with the exception of brain, wig-1 expression is di€erentially regulated in di€erent tissues in a manner that mirrors the pattern of p53 protein accumulation following irradiation. Although the presence of the zinc ®nger motifs raises the possibility that WIG-1 is a nucleic acid-binding protein, our experiments do not provide any direct clue about the role of wig-1 in the p53-dependent biological response. PAG680, a new p53-induced rat gene whose predicted protein product shows 97.9% amino acid sequence identity with WIG-1, was independently identi®ed by Israeli et al. (1997). This gene, which apparently is the rat homolog of wig-1, promotes apoptosis when overexpressed, implying that wig-1 also promotes apoptosis. More information regarding the biological function of wig-1 will most likely come from analyses of both the biochemical interactions of WIG-1 with other proteins in the cell and the e€ects of exogenous wig-1 expression in di€erent cell types. In addition, it will be interesting to see if wig-1 is induced by p53-independent apoptotic stimuli. Further studies of wig-1 along these lines should provide a better understanding of p53-induced biological responses. Materials and methods Cell culture The v-myc retrovirus-induced p53-negative mouse T cell lymphoma line J3D, transfected with either the temperature-sensitive Val-135 mutant p53 construct (J3DVal 135M6; henceforth referred to as J3D-ts p53), or vector alone (J3D-neo), has been described (Wang et al., 1993).

Cells were grown in Iscove's medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (GIBCO-BRL, MD) and 10% penicillin/streptomycin (GIBCO-BRL, MD). Cells were exposed to 6 Gy ionizing radiation and harvested at the indicated times. DNA isolation and Southern blot analysis Genomic DNA was isolated, cleaved with restriction endonucleases, and analysed by Southern blotting as described (Sambrook et al., 1989). RNA isolation and Northern blot analysis Total RNA was prepared by CsCl gradient ultracentrifugation of guanidine isothiocyanate-lysed cells. Poly(A) + was prepared using the MessageMaker kit (GIBCO-BRL, MD) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Northern blot analysis was performed following standard methods using 20 mg of total RNA per lane (Sambrook et al., 1989). Northern blot ®lters were hybridized with 32P-labeled probes using the Megaprime DNA labelling systems (Amersham, UK) and washed as described (Sambrook et al., 1989). Di€erential display PCR-based di€erential display was performed as described (Liang and Pardee, 1992; Liang et al., 1994; Bauer et al., 1993), with the following changes: 30 mg of each total RNA was treated with 30 U DNase I (GIBCO-BRL, MD) at room temperature for 15 min, extracted with phenol/ chloroform twice and chloroform once, and precipitated with ethanol. After suspention in DEPC-treated dH 2O, 0.4 mg of RNA were reverse-transcribed in a total volume of 20 ml containing either 1 mM T13A, T13C or T13G, 20 mM dNTPs, 10 mM DTT, 16RT bu€er (25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.3, 37.5 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2) and 200 U Superscript II reverse transcriptase (GIBCO-BRL, MD) for 60 min at 408C. The RNA and primers were incubated at 708C for 8 min before adding the reverse transcription cocktail. At the end of the reaction, reverse transcriptase was heat-inactivated at 958C for 5 min. Subsequent PCR ampli®cations were performed on a Perkin Elmer Geneamp PCR system 9600 in a total volume of 20 ml, containing 2 ml of the cDNA reaction, 1 mM of the appropriate T13N, 0.5 mM of an arbitrary 10-mer primer (Bauer et al., 1993), 2 mM dNTPs, 5 mCi 33P-dATP, 16PCR bu€er (10 mM TrisHCl, pH 8.4, 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2) and 1 U Taq polymerase (Perkin Elmer, CA). A hot start at 948C for 3 min was followed by 30 cycles of the cycling step (948C for 15 s, 408C for 2 min, 728C for 20 s) and an additional extension time of 5 min at 728C. The ampli®ed cDNA was then separated on denaturing 6% polyacrylamide sequencing gels. Di€erentially expressed bands were cut out of the dried gels, eluted by boiling in 100 ml dH2O for 15 min, precipitated with ethanol and resuspended in 20 ml dH2O. Four ml of each recovered cDNA were reampli®ed in a reaction volume of 40 ml for 25 cycles, using the same primer set and PCR conditions except that the concentration of dNTPs was 20 mM and that no isotope was added. The PCR products were separated on an agarose gel, puri®ed and subcloned using the TA cloning system (Invitrogen, Netherlands), following the manufacturer's instructions. cDNA inserts were isolated from the plasmids and used as probes for Northern blot analysis. Marathon cDNA ampli®cation PCR-based Marathon cDNA ampli®cation (Clontech, CA) was performed according to the manufacturer's instruc-

2703

New p53-induced zinc finger protein S Varmeh-Ziaie et al

2704

tions, except that the poly(A) +RNA was reverse transcribed using the Superscript II reverse transcriptase (GIBCO-BRL, MD). The cDNA fragment generated by di€erential display was used to design four primers, since the location of this fragment in the mRNA was unknown. One of these primers, P1 (5'-GGTTCTGTTTGGGCGAGTCTCCTG), and Anchor primer 1 ampli®ed the 3 kb closest to the poly(A) tail. A second primer, P2 (5'CACGGCAGCTCACAGGAGACTCGC), and Anchor primer 1 generated another 2 kb fragment toward the 5' end. In order to clone the very 5' 3 kb of the cDNA, the speci®c cDNA primer 5'-end-RT (5'CTGTTTTCTGTATATA) was used to synthesize ®rst strand cDNA. Subsequent PCR ampli®cation was performed using primer P3 (5'-CTCTAAAAGAAACCACGCCTACACG) and Anchor primer 1 (14 cycles). A nested PCR was carried out using 5 ml of the 10 times diluted primary PCR reaction and a combination of nested primer P4 (5'CCACGCCTACACGTCCCTAACATCC) and Anchor primer 2. The PCR products were puri®ed, subcloned using the TA cloning system (Invitrogen, Netherlands) and sequenced. DNA sequence analysis DNA sequencing was performed using the AutoRead Sequencing kit (Pharmacia Biotech, Sweden) and the Thermo Sequenase ¯uorescent labelled primer cycle

sequencing kit (Amersham, UK), and an ALF DNA sequencer (Pharamcia Biotech, Sweden). All sequence reactions were performed on pooled products from three independent PCR reactions, or subcloned DNA fragments in the pCR II vector (TA Cloning System; Invitrogen, Netherlands), using 5'-¯uorescein synthetic oligo-nucleotide primers. In vitro transcription and translation In vitro transcription and translation was performed using the TNT T7 Quick Coupled transcription/translation system (Promega, WN), according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Acknowledgements We thank Bert Vogelstein, Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, for the mouse p21 WAF1 cDNA, Philip Leder, Harvard Medical School, for the p21 7/7 mouse fibroblasts and Maj-Lis Solberg and Margareta Hagelin, Microbiology and Tumor Biology Center, Karolinska Institute, for technical assistance with gamma irradiation. This work was supported by a research grant from the Swedish Cancer Society to KGW. SVZ is the recipient of a graduate student fellowship from the Swedish Cancer Society.

References Bauer D, MuÈller H, Reich J, Riedel H, Ahrenkiel V, Warthoe P and Strauss M. (1993). Nucl. Acids Res.. 21, 4272 ± 4280. Caelles C, Helmberg A and Karin M. (1994). Nature, 370, 220 ± 223. Canman CE, Gilmer TM, Coutts SB and Kastan MB. (1995). Genes and Dev., 9, 600 ± 611. Haupt Y, Rowan S, Shaulian E, Vousden KH and Oren M. (1995). Genes and Dev., 9, 2170 ± 2183. Hunt T. (1985). Nature, 316, 580 ± 581. Israeli D, Tessler E, Haupt Y, Elkeles A, Wilder S, Amson R, Telerman A and Oren M. (1997). EMBO J. (in press). Kastan MB, Onyerkwere O, Sidransky D, Vogelstein B and Craig RW. (1991). Cancer Res., 53, 6304 ± 6311. Knudson CM, Tung KSK, Tourtellotte WG, Brown GAJ and Korsmeyer SJ. (1995). Science, 270, 96 ± 99. Ko LJ and Prives C. (1996). Genes and Dev., 10, 1054 ± 1072. Kuerbitz SJ, Plunkett BS, Walsh VW and Kastan MB. (1992). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89, 7491 ± 7495. Liang P and Pardee AB. (1992). Science, 257, 967 ± 971. Liang P, Zhu W, Zhang X, Guo Z, O'Connell P, Averboukh L, Wang F and Pardee AB. (1994). Nucl. Acids Res., 22, 5763 ± 5764. MacCallum DE, Hupp TR, Midgley CA, Stuart D, Campbell SJ, Larper A, Walsh FS, Wright EG, Balmain A, Lane DP and Hall PA. (1996). Oncogene, 13, 2575 ± 2587. Martinez J, Georgo€ I, Martinez J and Levine A. (1991). Genes and Dev., 5, 151 ± 159.

Miyashita T and Reed JC. (1995). Cell, 80, 293 ± 299. Owen-Schaub LB, Zhang W, Cusack JC, Angelo LS, Santee SM, Fujiwara T, Roth JA, Deisseroth AB, Zhang WW, Kruzel E and Radinsky R. (1995). Mol. Cell. Biol., 15, 3032 ± 3040. Pientenpol JA, Tokino T, Thiagalingam S, El-Deiry WS, Kinzler KW and Vogelstein B. (1994). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 91, 1998 ± 2002. Robbins J, Dilwarth SM, Laskey RA and Dingwall C. (1991). Cell, 64, 615 ± 623. Sabbatini P, Lin J, Levine AJ and White E. (1995). Genes and Dev., 9, 2184 ± 2192. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF and Maniatis T. (1989). Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Cold Spring Harbor, NY. Waldman T, Kinzler KW and Vogelstein B. (1995). Cancer Res., 55, 5187 ± 5190. Wang Y, Ramqvist T, Szekely L, Axelson H, Klein G and Wiman KG. (1993). Cell Growth and Di€., 4, 467 ± 473. Wang Y, Okan I, Szekely L, Klein G and Wiman KG. (1995). Cell Growth and Di€., 6, 1071 ± 1075. Yin C, Knudson M, Korsmeyer SJ and Van Dyke T. (1997). Nature, 385, 637 ± 640. Yonish-Rouach E, Resnitzky D, Lotem J, Sachs L, Kimchi A and Oren M. (1991). Nature, 352, 345 ± 347.

Suggest Documents