Sep 17, 2015 - distribution. II. Need for more Data a) Household balance sheets b) Micro statistics. III. Need for bette
UNU-WIDER 30th Anniversary Conference
Wealth Distribution: What Next?
James Davies September 17, 2015
Outline I.
Background: estimating world wealth distribution II. Need for more Data a) Household balance sheets b) Micro statistics
III. Need for better data a) Include employer-based pensions? b) Pay more attention to upper tail
IV. Wealth data in China and India
I. Background: Estimating world wealth distribution James Davies, Susanna Sandström, Tony Shorrocks, Ed Wolff • “The world distribution of household wealth” in J.B. Davies (ed.) Personal Wealth from a Global Perspective (OUP, 2008) • “The level and distribution of global household wealth”, Economic Journal, March 2011 Tony Shorrocks, James Davies, Rodrigo Lluberas
• Credit Suisse Global Wealth Report & Databook 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014. http://economics.uwo.ca/people/davies_docs/credit-suisse-global-wealth-report2014.pdf
http://economics.uwo.ca/people/davies_docs/global-wealth-databook-2014-v2.pdf
Special topics in our annual reports 2010: Gender dimensions
Wealth Composition
2011: Long-run trends in levels
Wealth & Age
2012: Debt
Inheritance
2013: Mobility
Weath in the Eurozone
2014: Inequality trends since 2000
2015: Global middle class
Aggregate global wealth, 2000-2013 trillion USD 250
200
Africa India
150
Latin America China
100
Asia-Pacific Europe
50
North America
0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Country wealth levels, 2013
Regional composition of global wealth distribution, 2013 100%
North America Latin America
90%
80%
Africa 70%
Europe 60%
China
50%
India
40%
30%
20%
Asia-Pacific
10%
0% 1
2
3
4
5
6 Decile
7
8
9
10
Global wealth distribution 2014, adults Decile
Share (%)
Decile
Share (%)
1
-0.3
8
2.6
2
0.1
9
7.1
3
0.1
10
87.4
4
0.3
Top 5%
75.7
5
0.5
Top 1%
48.2
6
0.8
Gini
0.911
7
1.4
Mean
$51,634
Wealth Share of Top 1% by Region, 2000-2014 Region
Year 2000
2004
2007
2009
2011
2014
Africa
39.7
40.0
39.4
42.4
42.9
46.1
Asia-Pacific
39.0
37.6
36.8
37.6
38.6
40.4
China
19.0
22.8
27.2
30.3
33.1
37.2
Europe
31.7
29.1
27.8
28.2
29.6
31.1
India
36.8
41.6
46.4
48.3
48.7
49.0
Latin America North America *
39.6
37.1
35.1
36.1
38.3
40.5
34.7
34.7
34.8
35.0
35.5
36.9
World
48.7
46.3
44.7
44.0
45.0
48.2
*new estimates
Wealth Share of Top 10% by Region, 2000-2014 Region
Year 2000
2004
2007
2009
2011
2014
Africa
74.4
74.9
73.9
76.0
76.3
78.3
Asia-Pacific
86.4
84.0
81.1
83.8
84.8
85.3
China
48.6
52.2
56.1
58.7
60.8
64.0
Europe
70.1
67.8
66.3
66.7
67.8
68.8
India
65.9
69.2
72.3
73.6
73.8
74.0
Latin America North America *
70.4
68.6
66.8
67.2
68.7
70.8
71.5
70.4
72.1
74.8
75.2
75.7
World
88.5
87.3
85.1
85.4
85.5
87.4
*new estimates
II. Need for more data: household balance sheets • Estimated by... national statistical organizations, central banks or ministries of finance • Counterparty data for most financial assets • Surveys, perpetual inventories for non-financial assets • Data available in 2014: – 17 countries complete - - all in OECD except Singapore, South Africa and Taiwan – 30 countries only financial assets & debts - - all OECD or Transition except Brazil, Colombia, Cyprus, Malta, and Thailand
II. Need for more data: micro statistics • Countries with survey data (28 current): – China 1995, 2002 & 2013 out soon – India every 10 yrs...... Latest 2012 – 15 EU countries with HFCS – 5 “Anglo-Saxon” countries: Australia, Canada, New Zealand, UK, US – Chile, Japan, Korea, Thailand – Denmark, Norway: survey/register data • Others soon: Ireland, Uruguay
III. Need for better data: include pensions? • Employer-based pensions in surveys: – Australia: 2003-04, 2005-06, 2009-10, 2011-12 – Canada, SFS: 1999, 2005, 2012 – UK, WAS: 2006-08, 2008-10, 2010-12 – US, SCF, only defined-contribution pensions: every 3 years since 1983 • Tax sheltered retirement saving plans only: – 15 EU countries with HFCS surveys – A few others
Wealth inequality with and without employer-based pensions, no “social security wealth” Country
Gini Coefficient W/O
With
Share of top 10% W/O
With
Australia, SIH 2012 Canada, SFS 2012
0.689
0.655
53.2%
0.67
0.59
52
UK, WAS 2006-08
0.581
0.606
40.7
US, SCF 2007/2010
0.860
0.809*
UK, Estate Tax 1994
46.4%
Share of top 20% W/O
With
60.7%
61.2%
69.9
64.8
58.5
61.6
43 43.4
*Takes into account effect of DC pensions in 2010 SCF microdata plus effect of DB pensions estimated by Wolff (2011) for 2007.
III. Need for better data: pay more attention to the upper tail • Upper tail hard to estimate in surveys: – Sampling error • Prob of finding anyone in top .01% by random sampling = 63.2%; of finding at least one billionaire in India = 0.1% • Partial solution: try to over-sample upper tail
– Non-sampling error • Under-reporting - - worse for financial assets • Differential response rates – Partial solution: weight according to characteristics correlated with wealth (income in tax records; geographic area...)
III. Need for better data: pay more attention to the upper tail (continued) • Don’t restrict attention to surveys – Estate and wealth tax records – Investment income multiplier method – Forbes and other rich lists
• Don’t randomly sample to determine the upper tail of the distribution of stars according to brightness. Go out and look up!
Pareto Top Tail Thousands of adults above wealth level (logarithmic scale)
1,000,000 100,000 10,000 1,000 100 10 1 100000
1000000
10000000
100000000
Weallth level (USD, Logarithmic scale) Unadjusted wealth estimates
Fitted Pareto
1E+09
Number of Forbes Billionaires by Country of Citizenship Country
2015
Country
1. USA
2001 269
2001 6
2015
535
15. Singapore
2. Japan
29
24
16. Israel
5
17
3. Germany
28
103
17. Sweden
5
23
4. Italy
18
39
18. Taiwan
5
33
5. Canada
16
39
19. Turkey
5
32
6. Switzerland
16
29
20. Argentina
4
5
7. France
15
47
21. India
4
92
8. Hong Kong
14
55
22. Malaysia
4
12
9. Mexico
13
16
23. Australia
3
27
10.UK
12
53
24. Greece
3
3
11.Russia
8
88
25. Philippines
3
11
12. S. Arabia
8
10
26. Chile
2
12
13. Spain
8
21
27. Denmark
2
0
14. Brazil
6
54
28. Indonesia
2
22
19
Country
2001
2015
Country
2001
2015
29. Ireland
2
5
44. N. Zealand
1
2
30. Netherlands
2
9
45. UAE
1
4
31. Norway
2
10
46. Austria
0
7
32. Portugal
2
0
47. Peru
0
6
33. S. Africa
2
7
48. Finland
0
5
34. S. Korea
2
30
49. Kazakhstan
0
5
35. Thailand
2
17
50. Kuwait
0
5
36. Venezuela
2
3
51. Nigeria
0
5
37. Belgium
1
3
52. Poland
0
5
38. Bermuda
1
0
53. Monaco
0
3
39. China
1
213
54. Morocco
0
3
40. Colombia
1
0
55. Oman
0
2
41. Egypt
1
0
42. Lebanon
1
7
43. Lichtenstein
1
0
56 – 65: Angola, Algeria, Georgia, Guatemala, Guernsey, Iceland,Lithuania Nepal, St. Kitts & N, Vietnam - - all 0, 1
Survey data versus our estimates– top 20% Survey Data
Country
Our Estimates
Share of top 20%
10%
1%
20%
10%
1%
Australia
61.8
66.0
Canada
67.2
47.7
73.2
57.0
Chile
56.4
37.6
79.7
68.9
China
59.3
41.4
75.2
64.0
Denmark
92.8
69.3
85.5
67.5
Finland
64.9
45.0
71.1
54.5
France
67.5
50.0
69.5
53.1
Germany
76.3
59.2
77.7
61.7
India
69.9
52.9
15.7
83.4
74.0
49.0
Indonesia
78.9
65.4
28.7
86.1
77.2
50.3
Italy
62.6
45.7
14.8
66.6
51.5
21.7
Japan
55.3
34.3
65.4
48.5
24.4
Survey data versus our estimates– top 20% Survey Data
Country
Our Estimates
Share of top 20%
10%
1%
20%
10%
1%
Netherlands
61.3
40.2
71.1
54.8
New Zealand
67.0
48.0
72.9
57.0
Norway
80.1
65.3
80.4
65.8
Spain
61.3
45.0
16.5
68.8
55.6
27.0
Sweden
67.0
24.0
68.6
30.8
Switzerland
71.3
34.8
71.9
30.9
Thailand
69.5
83.9
UK
62.8
44.3
12.5
69.5
54.1
23.3
USA
86.7
74.4
34.1
86.7
74.6
38.4
Average
68.5
52.8
22.6
75.4
62.1
33.9
IV. China and India • China: – Surveys in 1995, 2002 and 2012 by Institute of Economics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS) • Nationally representative • Gini = 0.45 in 1995, 0.55 in 2002 • 2012 results not yet released
– China Household Finance Survey 2012 (Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu) • Oversamples wealthy regions, emphasis on financial assets
China: unadjusted wealth distribution from CASS surveys Decile
Share (%) 1995
Share (%) 2002
Decile
Share (%) 1995
Share (%) 2002
1
2.0
0.7
8
11.8
11.8
2
3.8
2.1
9
15.2
17.9
3
5.0
3.0
10
30.7
41.4
4
6.1
3.8
Gini
0.40
0.55
5
7.2
4.8
Rural Per Capita
6
8.4
6.2
Urban Per Capita
13,698
46,134
7
9.8
8.3
All-China Per Capita
12,102
25,897
11,427 yuan 12,938 yuan
India: asset distribution from AIDIS surveys Share (%) 1992
Share (%) 2002
Share (%) 2012
1st quintile
0.9
1.0
0.8
2nd quintile
3.8
3.7
3.0
3rd quintile
8.4
8.2
6.7
4th quintile
17.4
17.2
14.9
9th decile
17.0
17.0
15.5
10th decile
52.5
52.9
59.1
Top 5%
38.2
38.3
Top 1%
16.2
15.7
Gini
0.668
0.669
Urban Mean/ Rural Mean
1.35
1.57
0.716
Conclusions - World wealth inequality: - High; fell 2000-07; rising since 2007
- Need for more data: - Household balance sheets (HBS) and wealth surveys needed in more countries, - Real assets need to be added in many HBSs - Need for better data a) Include employer-based pensions if possible b) Upper tail needs more work - China and India continue to lead the developing world in wealth measurement
Extra Slides
Wealth inequality with and without pensions including “social security wealth” Country
Gini Coefficient W/O
With
Share of top 10% W/O
With
Australia, SIH 2012 Finland, 2005
0.497
0.336
Germany, SOEP 2007
0.799
0.637
0.67
0.49
0.860
0.688*
UK, Estate Tax 1994 US, SCF* 2007/2010
52%
Share of top 20% W/O
With
60.7%
60.8%
36%
*Takes into account effect of DC pensions in 2010 SCF microdata plus effect of DB pensions & social security estimated by Wolff (2011).
Top Wealth Shares in Survey Data Country
Year
Unit
Share of top 25%
20%
10%
5%
2%
1.0%
Australia
2010
household
61.8
Austria
2010
household
77.1
61.7
Belgium
2010
household
61.2
44.1
Canada
2012
family
67.2
47.7
Chile
2011
household
56.4
37.6
China
2002
person
59.3
41.4
Cyprus
2010
household
72.4
56.8
Denmark
2009
family
92.8
69.3
Finland
2010
household
64.9
45.0
France
2010
household
67.5
50.0
Germany
2011
household
76.3
59.2
Greece
2009
household
56.7
38.8
India
2002
household
69.9
52.9
38.3
15.7
Indonesia
1997
household
78.9
65.4
56.0
28.7
Italy
2010
household
68.9
62.6
45.7
32.9
Japan
2009
household
62.8
55.3
34.3
19.3
21.0
14.8
0.5%
0.10%
Top Wealth Shares in Survey Data (continued) Country
Year
Unit
Share of top 25%
20%
10%
5%
2%
1.0%
21.7
16.5
Korea, Rep.
2011
household
63.9
Luxembourg
2010
household
66.7
51.3
Malta
2010
household
62.0
46.9
Netherlands
2009
household
61.3
40.2
New Zealand
2001
tax unit
67.0
48.0
Norway
2004
household
80.1
65.3
Portugal
2010
household
67.9
52.7
Slovakia
2010
household
48.9
32.8
Slovenia
2010
household
54.3
36.2
Spain
2008
household
61.3
45.0
32.6
Sweden
2007
adult
67.0
49.0
24.0
Switzerland
1997
family
71.3
58.0
34.8
Thailand
2006
household
69.5
UK
2008
adult
62.8
44.3
30.5
12.5
USA
2010
family
86.7
74.4
60.9
67.3
90.3
44.8
34.1
0.5%
0.10%
27.6
16.0
Global trends in wealth per adult, 2000-2013 USD per adult 50000
40000
30000
20000
10000
0
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 net worth financial wealth debt
net worth at constant exchange rates non-financial wealth
Wealth per adult (USD) by region, selected years Region
2000
2007
2014
Africa
$2,894
$6,448
$5,080
Asia-Pacific
32,933
40,261
44,715
China
5,672
16,790
21,330
Europe
61,272
142,001
145,977
India
2,036
5,109
4,645
Latin America & Caribbean
11,159
20,151
22,997
North America
198,984
283,757
340,340
WORLD
31,680
52,316
56,016
Wealth per adult (USD) by region, constant exchange rates Region
2000
2007
2014
Africa
$2,494
$5,880
$6,241
Asia-Pacific
36,226
40,920
44,708
China
6,567
17,157
18,515
Europe
79,944
121,679
136,816
India
1,963
4,154
5,764
Latin America & Caribbean
8,727
18,747
25,842
North America
202,219
280,327
338,166
WORLD
35,355
49,252
54,714
Dollar millionaires by country of residence Spain,1% Sweden, 1% Netherlands, 1% Switzerland, 2% Canada, 3% Australia, 3% China, 3% Italy, 4% US, 39%
Germany, 5%
UK, 6%
France, 8%
Rest of World, 11%
Japan, 13%
Differences in wealth and in financial development • Bottom 80% of countries by GDP in 2011: – Wealth/GDP: 1.95 – Financial/Non-Financial Assets: 0.67
• Top 20% of countries by GDP in 2011: – Wealth/GDP: 4.04 – Financial/Non-Financial Assets: 1.27
Wealth Composition • Wealth dominated by Real Assets in low income countries • ”Financial Interrelations Ratio” rises with development Ratio = Financial Assets/Non-Financial Assets Goldsmith (1985) said: – Averages about 0.5 in LDCs – Approx 1.0 in Developed Countries • Large differences in wealth composition for countries at similar income • Debt a smaller % of Assets in low income countries
Asset composition, 2011 South Africa United States Japan Switzerland Denmark Singapore China Czech Republic France Indonesia India -40
-20
0
20
Non-financial assets
40
60
Financial assets
80
100
Debts
The global wealth pyramid, 2012
Source: Credit Suisse Global Wealth Databook, Shorrocks/Davies/Lluberas