Sep 1, 1997 - Evans (1996), in his award-winning lecture, reviewed the consequences of DNA damage in present generations and their offspring. Realizing ...
Mutagenests vol.13 no.l pp.75-79, 1998
X-ray-induced DNA double-strand breaks in human sperm
Narendra RSingh1-3 and Ralph E.Stephens2 'Department of Bioengineering, Box 357962, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 and 2Department of Pathology, M368 Starling Loving Hall, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
Introduction Evans (1996), in his award-winning lecture, reviewed the consequences of DNA damage in present generations and their offspring. Realizing the importance of environmental DNA damage to parents and its effects in following generations, several investigators have studied DNA damage in sperm cells. Gorczyca etal. (1993) and Sailer et al. (1995) used terminal deoxynucleotide assays to distinguish between dead (labeled) and live (non-labeled) sperm cells from human semen samples. Sega etal. (1986) used alkaline elution assays to study induction of DNA single-strand breaks in sperm from mice exposed to methyl methanesulfonate. Using alkaline elution, Sega and Generoso (1988) detected DNA single-strand breaks in sperm cells from mice treated with ethylene oxide. Singh et al. (1988) found abundant alkali-labile sites using the microgel electrophoresis technique while looking for levels of strand breaks in human and mouse sperm. Due to extensive singlestrand breakage, they were unable to quantify the levels of breaks even in control samples. More recently, Fraga et al. (1996) studied oxidative products of DNA from smokers in sperm cell lysates using HPLC. Knowing the importance of measuring DNA damage in sperm cells, it is surprising that there is no literature concerning the estimation of DNA double-strand breaks in human sperm. Also, the presence of abundant alkali-labile sites in sperm obviates the detection of single-strand breaks; we attempted to standardize the microgel electrophoresis technique to quantify DNA double-strand breaks in sperm cells. Due to the unique packaging of DNA (condensed chromatin) in sperm cells compared with other cells, it is difficult to free the DNA from proteins. Different strategies have been adopted to decondense the DNA. Here we have standardized a protocol that allows
Materials and Methods Most of the chemicals were purchased from Sigma (St Louis, MO). Three samples were collected from each of three healthy young adult donors who were asked to abstain for 2 days before providing each sample. Lymphocytes were isolated from the blood of one of the sperm donors. After viability testing (which was always >97% by dye exclusion test), these samples were immediately irradiated with 0, 12.5, 25, 50 and 100 cGy X-rays using a Kelley-Koett device (Covington, CT) at a rate of 100 cGy/min. Approximately 0.5 uJ semen were well mixed with 50 ul 0.7% 1:3 high resolution agarose (Amresco, Solon, OH). Fifty microliters of the sperm cell suspension in agarose was layered onto the fully frosted and already agarose-coated (dried) slides (coating the slides with 100 \i\ 0.5 or 0.7% agarose and drying this first layer allowed the firm attachment of subsequent layers of agarose). After removing the coverglass, another layer of 200 |il agarose was layered on top of the cells. The thicker third layer helps to prevent DNA from escaping during lysis and electrophoresis. This thick layer, however, has a disadvantage in that it does not allow easy access of enzymes to the lysed cells in the agarose and later it traps more salts and detergents during the dehydration and drying processes. Salt and detergent interfere with the fluorescent signal from DNA. After removing the coverglass, slides were immersed in a cold lysing solution of 2.5 M NaCl, 100 mM EDTA disodium salt, 10 mM Tns, pH 10, 1% sodium lauryl sarcosine and 1% Triton X-100. Triton X-100 was added 1 h before the experiments by stirring for at least 30 min. After 1 h cold lysis, slides were transferred to a solution for enzyme treatment (2.5 M NaCl, 5 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 0.05% sodium lauryl sarcosine) with 10 Ug/ml RNase A (Amresco, Solon, OH). The slides were incubated at 37°C for 4 h. The slides were transferred to the solution for enzyme treatment containing 1 mg/ml DNase-free proteinase K (Amresco, Solon, OH) and incubated at 37°C for 15 h. For hydrogen peroxide experiments, slides were exposed to differing concentrations of the chemical for 1 h at room temperature in the solution for enzyme treatment. The slides were placed on a horizontal slab in an electrophoretic unit and microgels equilibrated with 300 mM sodium acetate, 100 mM Tris, pH 9, for 20 min and electrophoresed at 12 V (0.4 V/ cm) and ~100 mA for 1 h. The slides were immersed in 1 M ammonium acetate in ethanol for 30 min and then in absolute ethanol for a minimum of 2 h. The slides were transferred to 70% ethanol for 30 min and air dried. The slides were stained with a freshly prepared 1 (iM solution of YOYO (Molecular Probe, Eugene OR) in 5% DMSO. The stock solution of YOYO usually comes at 1 mM concentration and should be diluted 1:1000. To achieve uniform staining, slides may be prestained with a freshly prepared 50 |il solution of 5% DMSO, 10 mM NaH2PO4, 5% sucrose. Observations were made using a Reichert fluorescent microscope having a FTTC filter combination (excitation 490, dichroic 500, emission 510 nm). Lymphocytes were also processed in similar ways and analysis was performed under identical conditions as for sperm cells. Total length (urn), which included the nucleus and migrated DNA up to the last pixel, was measured using an eyepiece micrometer. Data were subjected to one way ANOVA. Student-Newman-Keuls test was used for all pairwise multiple comparisons (significant at P < 0.05).
Results Lysed cells when treated first with RNase and then with proteinase K in a solution containing 2.5 M NaCl, 0.05%
^To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 206 685 2060; Fax: +1 206 685 2060; Email: narendra®u.washington.edu © UK Environmental Mutagen Society/Oxford University Press 1998
75
Downloaded from mutage.oxfordjournals.org by guest on July 13, 2011
A methodology for quantifying DNA double-strand breaks in human sperm is described. Sperm from three healthy human donors on three separate days each were irradiated with 12.5,25,50 and 100 cGy X-rays. Linear dose-response effects were observed in migrated DNA from sperm nuclei when electrophoresed under neutral conditions. RNase and proteinase K treatments for longer duration were necessary, to decondense the chromatin and presumably to release the broken DNA for migration in the electrophoretic field in a dose-dependent manner. An increase in DNA migration was observed with as low as 12£ cGy, but damage was observed in all samples at 25 cGy. No evidence of repair of these X-ray-induced DNA double-strand breaks was observed during a 2 h period.
dissociation of other macromolecules from DNA. Cells were lysed in microgels at 4°C for 1 h and then treated with RNase A for 4 h at 37°C and proteinase K for at least 15 h at 37°C. For detection of DNA double-strand breaks, microgels were electrophoresed at neutral pH. This study deals with the basal levels of DNA double-strand breaks in human sperm and the response of these cells to X-rays and H2O2 in vitro.
N.RSlngh and R.E.Stephens
RNase (10 |ig/ml for 4 h) and proteinase K (1 mg/ml for 15 h) treatment, either alone or in combination with cysteine, a linear response to X-ray dose was observed (Figure 4). However, when the above protocol of extensive enzymatic treatment was combined with heparin and glutathione, the response to X-rays was insignificant (Figure 4). No evidence of repair of these double-strand breaks was observed when cells, after exposure to 100 cGy, were allowed to repair at 37°C for up to 2 h. However, human lymphocyte repair is almost complete under these conditions (Figure 5). When lysed cells were exposed to RNase followed by 1 mg/ml L-cysteine and 0.5 mg/ml proteinase K, a non-linear dose-response relationship was achieved (Figure 6). When proteinase K was replaced with 3 mg/ml heparin and 3 mg/ml glutathione, a non-linear dose-response relationship was obtained (Figure 6). In this case we observed very small halos or nucleoids, indicating incomplete decondensation of chromatin. Sperm cells lysed, exposed first to RNase and proteinase K and then to 0, 17.6, 35.2, 70.4, 140.8 or 281.6 u_M hydrogen peroxide showed a linear dose-response relationship in length of DNA migration (Figure 7). Discussion
sodium lauryl sarcosine, 5 mM Tris, pH 7.4, for adequate times show a linear dose-response effect to 12.5, 25, 50 and 100 cGy X-rays (Figures 1 and 2). We observed significant differences in response in samples collected on different days. Data from the same individual for each of three days was combined. With the combined data, for each individual, significant differences were detected between all doses except between the control and 12.5 cGy for subject 3. Due to the compact chromatin, sperm cells do not reveal any strand breaks when exposed to X-rays, lysed and electrophoresed under neutral or alkaline conditions (Figure 3). After lysis in regular lysis solution containing 2.5 M NaCl, 100 mM EDTA, 1% sodium lauryl sarcosine, 10 mM Tris, pH 10, Triton X-100, DNA migration show an inverse X-ray dose-response relationship (data not shown). Furthermore, when we used a lysing solution having 2.5 M NaCl, 0.05% sodium lauryl sarcosine, 5 mM Tris, pH 7.4, for extensive 76
The decondensation step is essential for the demonstration of an X-ray-induced linear dose-response relationship with a reasonable sensitivity of 12.5 cGy. We observed a high variability in DNA migration in control cells and cells exposed to X-rays. We currently do not understand the reasons for this. One reason may be that large numbers of sperm cells carry various levels of chromosomal aberrations (>10% cells showing abnormality; Genesca etal, 1992). The other reason for this variability may be inadequate DNA decondensation in
Downloaded from mutage.oxfordjournals.org by guest on July 13, 2011
Fig. 1. Photomicrographs of DNA migration patterns from sperm cells unirradiated (A) or irradiated with (B) 12.5 or (C) 100 cGy X-rays. Cells were stained with YOYO 1 (X400).
Protamines constitute ~85% and histones ~159b of proteins in sperm cells (Tanphaichitr et al, 1978). Packaging of DNA in sperm cells is 6-fold more compact and has 40-fold less volume than that in somatic cells (Wyrobek etal., 1976; Ward and Coffey, 1991; Ward, 1994; Ward and Zalensky, 1996). To achieve this compactness there is disulfide bonding between DNA and protamines. DNA-protein (protamine) disulfide bonding is used to fold the DNA like a folded ladder at specific sites and at specific and regular intervals. This is called a linear side-by-side arrays model (Balhorn, 1982; Ward and Coffey, 1991; Ward, 1994). This packaging is useful in sperm cells to reduce volume for easier passage through the genital tract, to minimize damage by exogenous agents before fertilization and to keep the genome inactive during travel. This sleeping genome (Ward, 1994) is incapable of repairing damage. The compact packaging does not allow easy dissociation of the DNA from proteins and thus it is difficult to perform assays for DNA strand breaks. Investigators have achieved decondensation of mouse sperm using cysteine and proteinase K in combination (Sega etal, 1986) and in human sperm using proteinase K (Singh et al, 1988) heparin and glutathione in combination (Reyes, 1989). We tried all these protocols with limited success. Addition of the RNase digestion step and the change in lysing solution for enzyme digestion allowed chromatin decondensation. We also noted that the presence of ionic (sodium lauryl sarcosine) and non-ionic (Triton X-100 or NP-40) detergents in the lysing solution for 1 h prior to enzymatic treatment was necessary for adequate DNA decondensation.
X-ray-induced DNA double-strand breaks
Subject 2
Subject 1
Subject 3
Control
12.5 cGy
Control
LililL^
Control-i
-I 12.5 cGy.
12.5 cGy_|
25cGy
25cGy-
50cGy
50cGy.
llllll.l,, -
s
25cGy
-t-
llllUlL. ,. 50cGy
II. ..I
. Ill IIIU . •_ 100 cGy
100 cGy-
100 cGy
150
200
2S0
100
160
200
260
DNA Migration (microns)
DNA Migration (microns)
Dose in centigray
Dose in centigray
7S
Downloaded from mutage.oxfordjournals.org by guest on July 13, 2011
ll.l.
-f100
100
160
200
260
DNA Migration (microns)
100
Dose in centigray
Fig. 2. (Upper) Frequency distribution of DNA migration from 150 human sperm cells from three subjects after exposure to 0, 12.5, 25, 50 and 100 cGy Xrays. (Lower) XY line plots showing changes in means of DNA migration and standard deviation (error bars) from 150 cells with increasing doses of X-rays.
some cells. A reduction in variability or analyzing a larger number of cells will further enhance sensitivity. We did not observe any dose-response relationship using a combination of heparin and reduced glutathione (replenishing glutathione every hour for 4 h). Small or incomplete halos with a compact central core were seen. Complete decondensation of DNA was observed in control samples when digested with 0.5 mg/ml proteinase K and 1 mg/ml cysteine in combination. However, samples irradiated with 50 and 100 cGy did not show complete decondensation of DNA, which resulted in a non-linear dose-response relationship. We feel that some proteins were left undigested due to a low concentration of proteinase K in the protocol (0.5 versus 1 mg/ml). We were surprised at the effectiveness of RNase treatment but note that sperm cells have been shown to have 0.1 pg RNA (Passot etai, 1989). The authors reported various sizes of molecules of RNA, some in the form of nucleoproteins, and speculated
that the RNA is probably needed soon after fertilization. Because of the effectiveness of RNase in our system, we speculate that the RNA may be bound to the DNA like proteins and play a role in packaging of DNA in sperm cells. RNase A digestion may be necessary for dissociation of the DNA from other macromolecules. We also found that elimination of EDTA and Triton X-100 from the lysis solution during enzymatic digestion of chromatin and higher concentration of agarose (0.7 rather than 0.5%) provided us with a better Xray-induced linear dose-response relationship (r2 > 0.9). Sperm cells lack an effective DNA repair capacity, as has been shown by Sega (1974) and Genesca etal. (1992) using unscheduled DNA synthesis and a cytogenetic technique respectively. We also did not observe any repair of DNA double-strand breaks in sperm cells over a period of 2 h. This could be due to the compactness and thus inactivity of the genome. Contrary to this, we noticed complete repair of 77
N.P.Singh and R.E.Stephens
200
-PK1mg/ml+RNAse - Cysteine+PK 0.5mg/ml+RNAse - Heparin+Glutathione +RNAse
1 O) 100-
1 50H 0-
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
X-rays dose (Grays) Fig. 3. Photomicrograph of lysed and electrophoresed (but not digested with RNase or proteinase K) sperm cells showing a lack of decondensation of sperm DNA. Cells were stained with YOYO 1 (X400).
Fig. 6. XY line plot showing X-ray induced dose-response effects in human sperm cells lysed and decondensed using various protocols. In all three protocols RNase digestion was used after the lysis step. Each point is represented by the mean and standard deviation of DNA migration from 50 cells. 170n
- • - RNAse PK - • - RNAse PK, Heparin, Glutathione - • - RNAse PK, Cysteine
160150
1
120110-
o
»—
^
•
•
10090 5
ui
,___ t
H
55
105 155 205 255 305
Dose in \iM H2O 2
100 25
50
75
100
Dose in centigray Fig. 4. XY line plot demonstrating the efficacy of various protocols to decondense sperm DNA. RNase plus proteinase K and RNase plus cysteine plus proteinase K are effective. Each point is represented by the mean and standard deviation of DNA migration from 50 cells.
175i y
1
•
- • - Sperm repair (100 cGy) A Sperm (control) - » - Lymphocyte repair (100 cGy) • Lymphocytes (control)
E 150O)
1 125-
25
50
75
100
125
Repair time (minutes) Fig. S. XY line plot showing repair kinetics of DNA double-strand breaks in human lymphocytes and human sperm cells. Each point is represented by the mean and standard deviation of DNA migration from 50 cells. DNA double-strand breaks in lymphocytes seem to be repaired in 120 min but not in sperm cells.
78
140130-
Fig. 7. XY line plot showing a dose-dependent increase in DNA migration in human sperm cells lysed, treated with RNase and proteinase K and then exposed to differing concentrations of hydrogen peroxide in microgels. Each point is represented by the mean and standard deviation of DNA migration from 50 cells.
X-ray-induced DNA double-strand breaks in human lymphocytes. Similar results on DNA repair in human lymphocytes have been reported previously (Singh and Stephens, 1997). Preliminary results indicate that sperm cells treated with hydrogen peroxide in vitro for 1 h do not show a significant increase in DNA double-strand breaks even at the highest dose tested of 281.6 |iM (data not shown). However, DNA from lysed and RNase- and proteinase K-treated sperm cells in microgels does show a linear dose-response relationship when exposed to 35.2, 70.4, 140.8 and 281.6 (iM hydrogen peroxide (Figure 7). Together, these findings suggest that folding of sperm DNA, with the help of other macromolecules, like proteins, into condensed chromatin allows the cell to maintain the integrity of its DNA against chemicals like hydrogen peroxide which are generated intracellularly (Bize et ai, 1991). Also, this may imply that chemically induced DNA damage can be detected in sperm cells if progenitor cells (spermatogonia and spermatocytes) are exposed to DNA damaging agents in vivo and the damage is not repaired or not allowed to repair while these cells are progressing into the sperm stage. Progenitor cells are more vulnerable to DNA damage because their chromatin is not condensed. The development of this method to quantify DNA strand breaks in human sperm provides another biomonitoring tool. This technique can now be used to screen for the genotoxic
Downloaded from mutage.oxfordjournals.org by guest on July 13, 2011
DNA Migration in micror
200
X-ray-induced DNA doable-strand breaks
effects of various environmental agents and possibly for risk assessment in individuals as it might relate to the genotoxic or even mutagenic effects in their offspring. Acknowledgements We sincerely appreciate the gift of proteinase K from Amresco (Solon, OH). We thank Dr Henry Lai for his valuable help during this work.
References
Downloaded from mutage.oxfordjournals.org by guest on July 13, 2011
Balhorn,R. (1982) A model for the structure of chromatin in mammalian sperm. J. Cell Bio/., 93, 298-305. BizeJ., Santander.G., Cabello.F, Driscoll.D. and Sharpe.C. (1991) Hydrogen peroxide is involved in hamster sperm capacitation in vitro. Biol. Repwd., 44, 398-405. Evans,HJ. (1996) Mutations and mutagenesis in inherited and acquired human disease. Mutat. Res., 351, 89-103. Fraga,C.G., Motchnik,P.A., Wyrobek^J., RempelJD.M. and Ames.B.N. (1996) Smoking and low antioxidants levels increase oxidative damage to sperm DNA. Mutat. Res., 351, 199-203. Genesca,A., CaballinJvi.R., Miro,R., BenetJ., GermaJ.R. and EgozcueJ. (1992) Repair of human chromosome aberrations in the hamster egg. Hum. Genet., 89, 181-186. Genesca^A., NavarrowJ., EgozcueJ. and Templado.C. (1992) Cytogenetic studies in motile sperm from normal men. Hum. Genet., 89, 176-180. Gorczyca,W., Traganos,F., Jesionowskajl and Darzynkiewicz^. (1993) Presence of DNA strand breaks and increased sensitivity of DNA in situ to denaturation in abnormal human sperm cells: analogy to apoptosis of somatic cells. Exp. Cell Res., 207, 202-205. Passot,C.A., Brito,M, FigueroaJ., Concha,I.L, Yaffez.A. and Burzio,L. (1989) Presence of RNA in the sperm nucleus. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 158, 272-278. Reyes.R., Rosado,A., Hamandez,O. and Delgado.N.M. (1989) Heparin and glutathione: physiological decondensing agents of human sperm nuclei. Gamete Res., 23, 39-47. Sailer,B.L., Jost.K.L. and EvensonJD.P. (1995) Mammalian sperm DNA susceptibility to in situ denaturation associated with the presence of DNA strand breaks as measured by the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase assay. /. Androl., 16, 80-87. Sega,G.A. (1974) Unscheduled DNA synthesis in the germ cells of male mice exposed in vivo to the chemical mutagen ethyl methanesulfonate. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 71, 4955^959. Sega,G.A. and Generoso^E.E. (1988) The measurement of DNA breakage in spermiogenetic stages of mice exposed to ethylene oxide, using alkaline elution procedure. Mutat. Res., 197, 93-99. Sega,G.A., SluderAE., McCoy.L.S., OwensJ.G. and Generoso^.E. (1986) The use of alkaline elution procedure to measure DNA damage in spermiogenetic stages of mice exposed to methylmethanesulfonate. Mutat. Res., 159, 55-63. Srngh,N.P. and Stephens.R.E. (1997) Microgel electrophoresis: sensitivity mechanisms and, electrostretching. Mutat. Res., 383, 167-175. Singh,N.R, Danner.D.B., Tice.R.R., McCoy.M.T, Collins.G.D. and Schneider,E.L. (1988) Abundant alkali labile sites in DNA of human and mouse sperm. Exp. Cell Res., 184, 141-470. Tanphaichitr.N., Sobbom.P, Taluppeth.N. and Chalermisarachai.P. (1978) Basic nuclear proteins in testicular cells and ejaculated spermatozoa in man. Exp. Cell Res., 117, 247-256. Ward,W.S. (1994) The structure of the sleeping genome: implication of sperm DNA organization for somatic cells. J. Cell Biochem., 55, 77-82. Ward.W.S. and Coffey.D.S. (1991) DNA packaging and organization in mammalian spermatozoa: Comparison with somatic cells. Biol Repwd., 44, 569-574. Ward,W.S. and Zalensky,A.O. (1996) The unique complex organization of the transcriptionally silent sperm chromatin. Crit. Rev. Eukaryotic Gene Expression, 6, 139-147. WyrobekAJ., MeistrichJd.L., Furer.R. and Bruce.W.R. (1976) Physical characteristics of mouse sperm nuclei. Biophys. J., 16, 811-825. Received on June 20, 1997; revised on September 1, 1997
79