youth is a risk factor for stress fracture - Semantic Scholar

6 downloads 0 Views 503KB Size Report
Oct 19, 1992 - Corps. We report a prospective study of783 male Israeli recruits aged from 17 to 26 years. The risk of stress fracture was inversely proportional.
YOUTH

IS A

A STUDY

C.

OF

MILGROM,

From

RISK

783

A.

FACTOR

INFANTRY

STRESS

N. SHLAMKOVITCH,

University

Hospital,

N.

Jerusalem

RAND,

and

Surg

Received

[Br]

1994;

76-B:20-2.

1992; Accepted

19 October

after

revision

1993

2 June

B.

the Israel

We report a prospective study of783 male Israeli recruits aged from 17 to 26 years. The risk of stress fracture was inversely proportional to age on both univariate and multivariate analysis. Each year of increase of age above 17 years reduced the risk of stress fracture by 28%. J BoneJoint

FRACTURE

RECRUITS

FINESTONE,

the Hadassah

FOR

LEV,

A.

Defence

of the

epidemiology

of stress

fractures

derives from mass, density, three-dimensional and the quality of the component material but

role

of these

strains

the

which

lead

Study

is made

ofbone Wall,

more

architecture Chatterji The basic

factors to stress

in resisting fracture

difficult (Lindahl

yielded

(Giladi et al that strength

arrangement (Heaney 1992), the repetitive

in bone

by the strong

is not

1967;

and Jeffery 1979; Cohn et al 1982). training of Israeli Army infantry

Garn

1970;

offers

an

almost laboratory-like environment for the creation and study of stress fractures (Lancet 1986), and previous studies have identified some of the risk factors (Giladi et al 1991). We have hypothesised that bone age may be important, and as part of our ongoing research we have prospectively

evaluated stress

the effect of the age of recruits

fracture

among

on the incidence

of

them.

Before

AND

In a prospective recruits during

not complete

training

for reasons

796 male elite infantry training. Of these 13 did

unrelated

starting

to stress fracture,

training

all recruits

N. Rand,

MD,

MD, Associate Professor MD, Orthopaedic Resident Orthopaedic

Resident

A. Simkin, PhD, Biomechanical Engineer Department of Orthopaedics, Hadassah P0 Box 12000, Jerusalem, Israel. N. Shlamkovitch, MD, Major B. Lev, MD, Vice-Surgeon General M. Wiener, MD, Surgeon General Israel Defence Forces Medical Corps,

Correspondence

should

be sent

©1994 British Editorial Society 030l-620X194/1684 $2.00

20

University

Hospital,

Em

Kerem,

were

all gave

interviewed

sports activity and any history suggestive They all had an orthopaedic examination

distance,

external

quadriceps

fitness

was assessed

possible

number

rotation

et al length,

of

at 85#{176} knee

strength

the

1993). tibial

hip,

flexion.

and

the number

of sit-ups

one minute. The date and place of birth of each recruit recorded, and the country of origin of each parent. immigrants, the date of arrival in Israel was recorded. The

recruits

and

Physical

by the time of a 2 km run, the maximum of chin-ups,

were

followed

during

training

in were For

by a team

of

army doctors and an orthopaedic surgeon, and had free access to the medical staff. Examinations for stress fractures were made every two to three weeks. Suspected cases, with symptoms

suggesting

surgeon,

had appropriate

ten days

of the orthopaedic

intravenous with imaging Israel). Spot

stress

fracture

to

radiographs

the

orthopaedic

and a bone

examination.

This

scan

within

involved

an

dose of 20 mCi of ‘“Tc-methyldiphosphonate by an Elscint Dynmax camera (Elscint, Haifa, views of the pelvis, femora, tibiae and feet were

taken 120 minutes after injection and evaluated on a grading system of 1 to 4 (Zwas, Elkanovitch and Frank 1987). All data were recorded on a specially designed the

form and processed Israel

North

using

Defence

through

Medical

the Statistical

Carolina),

with

the computer Corps.

Analysis

standard

System

univariate

facilities

Statistics

were

(SAS, analysis

Cary, using

unpaired t-tests for comparison of the means of groups with and without stress fractures. For comparison of rates of morbidity we used the chi-squared or the Fisher exact test. To determine the interdependence analysis we used multiple logistic

C. Milgrom, A. Finestone,

783 recruits

to reveal stress fractures (Milgrom were made of weight, height, tibial

calculated

study we followed 14 weeks of basic

Corps

designed Records

of

METhODS

Medical

previous fracture.

evaluation MATERIALS

WIENER

regarding of stress

high known.

age-dependency

and Lindgren

Forces

intercondylar

has

some insight into the causes of these injuries 1991). In engineering structures it is clear

M.

or had incomplete data. The remaining their informed consent to our study.

isometric Study

SIMKIN,

of the results of univariate regression models of the

variables that were significant on univariate analysis. The results for these models were summarised by odds ratios for the factors of interest, including 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS Military

to Professor of Bone

P0

Box

02191,

C. Milgrom. and Joint

Surgery

Israel.

The Only basic

mean

age of the 783

26 were training.

symptoms

over A

suggestive

recruits

19 years total of

was

18.6

years

(17 to 26).

of age or older at the start of 35 1 recruits presented with

of stress THE JOURNAL

fractures OF BONE

and all had scintiAND JOINT

SURGERY

YOUTH Table

1. Variables

related

IS A RISK

to incidence

of stress

18.58

Height

(mm)

Tibial

175.4

length

(mm)

(n

Table stress

hip rotation

(degrees)

6.9 (p

II. Summary of multiple fractures at all sites

logistic

±

176.6 0.027)

±

38.9 0.049)

±

=

12.0 60.9 (p = 0.059)

±

regression

analysis

Age (yr)

38.4

of age.

The

most

physeal

plates.

shown

to

incidence

12.0

results

summarised

±

Table III. tibial stress

for

12.0

Summary fractures

60.7

±

176.4

(p

=

0.588)

2.3 (p

=

0.804)

38.7

12.0 60.5 (p = 0.626)

of multiple

logistic

±

6.6

±

2.5

±

12.0

regression

analysis

0.958

to 1.045

1.013

0.999

to 1.028

External

1.018

1.002

to 1.034

0.986

0.881

to 1.103

Tibial

0.905

0.802

to 1.022

0.716

0.531

to 0.965

Age (yr)

0.754

0.541

to 1.050

limits

the tibia,

the

followed

None evidence

results

for

significant

the

of the of open

logistic

fractures

regression

in Table

fractures in Table III. For each age from 17 to 26 years the risk

hip

rotation

length

(mm)

are

II and for tibial

year of increase for stress fracture

in at

all sites rotation

decreased by 28%. For each 1#{176} increase of the hip, the risk for tibial stress fracture

in external increased

by 2%.

The

showed

(degrees)

limits

geometry which governs their ability to withstand and torsional forces, and the mechanical properties bone tissue (Heaney in the age dependency Milgrom

to

studies

(mm)

confidence

for

during infantry training. In this context, the biomechanics of long bones can be viewed as a combination of their overall

variables

relationship

analysis.

for all stress

12.0 61.0 (p = 0.026)

±

7.2

0.69

±

1.000

the metatarsals. taken showed

of multiple

±

38.8

2.4

±

0.43 18.68 (p=O.l26)

Height

site was

I gives

63.4

175.9

6.6

±

to 1.015

a statistically

by univariate

The stress recruit

Table

have

38.9 0.009)

±

=

2.1

±

18.58

0.938

common

by the femur and then scintigraphs or radiographs

176.6 0.054)

±

=

(p

graphy. This was never performed on asymptomatic recruits. On the basis of these results 190 (24%) were diagnosed as having stress fractures, but none was seen in those over 19 years

0.8 (p

±

0.72

±

to 999.000

0.976

(mm)

175.4

0.44 18.69 (p=O.04l)

None (n = 723)

0.147

4.839

length

2.4

±

Fracture (n = 60)

643)

=

629.533

999.000

Tibial

6.6

18.59

(n

Intercept

Intercept

(degrees)

Femur None

to 999.000

confidence

hip rotation

by the I-test)

95%

95%

External

21

Odds ratio

Odds ratio

(mm)

significance

SD,

±

FRACTURE

Variable

Variable

Height

0.74

±

=

2.2

±

62.8

STRESS

Fracture (n = 140)

593)

=

0.44 18.70 (p=O.009)

±

(p External

(mean

None

±

38.5

FOR

Tibia

Fracture (n = 190)

Age (yr)

fracture

sites

All

Variable

FACTOR

tibial in the in this inertia, radius moment

1992). Both factors which we found.

et al (1989)

showed

may

that stress

bending of the

be implicated fractures

of the

diaphysis are usually due to repetitive bending forces mediolateral plane. The bending strength of the tibia plane is related to the cross-sectional area moment of which is proportional to the fourth power of the of the tibia. A narrow tibia with a low cross-sectional of inertia in the mediolateral plane was shown to be

a risk factor; this accords with Bone density is a measure

engineering of the mass

no

related

(Heaney

of

shown, however, to be a relatively poor predictor of fractures in the elderly and is only a risk factor (Ott 1992). This may

Within our study group 87% ofthe recruits were Israeliand 13% were born overseas, including 18 (2.3%) of Ethiopian origin. Ethiopian recruits had no stress fractures,

be because bone porosity, rather than density, is directly related to bone fragility (Schaffler and Burr 1988). In Israeli infantry recruits bone density does not correlate with stress

giving

fracture

risk

density

in this population

other

multiple

factors

femoral,

logistic

with

tibial,

regression

significant

or all-site

effects

stress

models on

the

incidence

fractures.

born

a statistically

compared p

=

with There

0.006).

Israeli-born

significant

Israeli-born was

reduction

recruits

no

significant

and non-Israeli-non-Ethiopian

in their

(Fisher’s difference

incidence

exact

test;

between

recruits.

results

indicate

for the likelihood VOL.

76-B,

No. 1. JANUARY

that

age

is a strong

of the development 1994

predicting

of stress

Bone

material

strength

(Leichter quality

et al 1989), also

perhaps

is within contributes

1992).

because

the normal to the

which

It has

is

been

the bone

range.

strength

of bone

(Grynpas 1992; Heaney 1992) and factors in this include its micro-architecture, matrix, mineralisation and the influence of microfatigue damage. We could find no studies of the relationship between bone quality and stress fracture.

DISCUSSION Our

to

principles. density,

variable

fractures

We found of 24%,

an incidence

corresponding

of scintigraphic

to that

in previous

stress

fracture

Israeli

studies,

C. MILGROM,

with

most

in the

All

tibia.

351

recruits

A. FINESTONE,

who

(45%)

N. SHLAMKOVITCH,

had

LET AL

It is unknown

whether

the

in risk for stress 1 7 to 26 years

fracture

bones

(Giladi et al 1987) but our measurement of another factor, high external rotation of the hip, confirmed the results of

studied

were

mature,

the

related to the fact that bones not reached full structural 25 000

radiographs

and

decreasing

of younger maturity. showed

risk

may

be

recruits had probably Garn (1970) studied

that

there

cortical bone width et al (1986) showed

well into the third that a 14-week period

infantry Leichter

training increased bone mineral content by 8%, and et al (1989) also reported an increase in bone

density during infantry training. (1986) showed that stress fractures of North American thoroughbreds

younger animals. Butterweck and demonstrate racehorses

of

these

Giladi

decade. of basic

higher

in younger

did

know

no

of

Ethiopian generally

recruit shorter,

not

cross-sectional or a combination

measure

tibial

bone

that Ethiopian recruits than their Israeli-born

width

recorded

case

of

stress

had a lower counterparts. fracture

to be protective

of these

clarify

other

benefits

racial

factors

in any

in

in the past four years. These Ethiopians lighter, able to run 2 km in less time,

lower upper-body strength than Israeli-born also have less external rotation of the hip,

been shown

No

aged

et al (1991).

We

study

were

We

indicates fracture

In a subsequent study, Nunamaker, Provost (1990) used strain gauges to strains

factors.

risk

have They

for recruits

bone density, increased changes in bone quality

Our study for stress

In horses, Nunamaker of the third metacarpal were more common in

that compressive during

is due to increased moment of inertia,

is a continued

gain in Margulies

of 28% per annum

decrease

scintigraphy had closed tibial and femoral epiphyses. In this population, both univariate and multivariate analysis showed that age was an important risk factor, with a decrease in incidence of 28% per added year of age. Although the long

form

for tibial stress

differences related have

may

to stress been

recruits. which has

fractures.

help

an are but

Further

to identify

and

fracture.

received

or will

be received

from

a

running. commercial

party

related

directly

or indirectly

to the subject

of this article.

REFERENCES Cohn

Garn

SH, Aloia JF, Vaswani AN, et al. Age bone mass measured by neutron activation. Makin M, Steinberg R, eds. Osteoporosis. Sons, 1982:33-43. SM.

The earlier gain perspective. Springfield,

and

the later Ill: Charles

and sex related changes in In: Menczel J, Robin GC, Chichester, etc: Wiley and

loss ofcortical C. Thomas,

bone: 1970.

in nutritional

Giladi

M, Milgrom C, Simkin A, et al. Stress fractures and tibial width: a risk factor. J BoneJoint Surg [Br] 1987; 69-B:326-9.

Giladi

M, Milgrom C, Simkin A, Danon Y. Stress risk factors. Am J Sports Med 1991; 19:647-52.

Grynpas MD. Workshop Bethesda,

Stress

fractures:

editorial.

Leichter I, Simkin A, Margulies following strenuous physical Lindahl

identifiable

0, Lindgren and density with

Lancet

1986;ii:727.

JY, et activity.

al.

Nunamaker DM. The bucked shin complex. Convention of AAEP, 1986; 457-60.

of the amount 38:133-40.

DM, Provost with

intense limbs

physical of young

of the

Proc

of the

MT.

Fatigue fractures peak bone strain,

age,

32nd

Annual in and

SM. When bone mass fails to predict bone failure: evidence for differences in bone quality. Workshop on Aging and Bone Quality. National Institute of Health, Bethseda, Maryland, 1992:15.

Schaffier MB, Burr DB. Stiffness of compact density. J Biomech 1988; 21:13-6.

bone:

effects changes bone.

Wall

JC, Chatterji 5K, and tensile strength 1979; 27: 105-8.

Jeffery JW. Age-related of human femoral cortical

Zwas

ST, bone

R, Frank G. Interpretation findings in stress fractures.

Gain in mass density of bone J Orthop Res 1989; 7:86-90.

AG. Cortical bone in man: 1 . Variation age and sex. Acta Orthop Scand 1967;

DM, Butterweck

thoroughbred racehorses: relationships training.JOrthopRes 1990; 8:604-11.

Ott Worshop Bethseda,

I, et al. Effect of content in the lower 1986; 68-A: 1090-3.

Milgrom C, Finestone A, Shlamkovitch N, et al. The clinical assessment of femoral stress fractures: a comparison of two methods. Military Medicine 1993; 158:190-2.

of bone. In: of Health,

in fragility fractures? Institute of Health,

JY, Simkin A, Leichter on the bone-mineral J BoneJoint Surg [Am/

Milgrom C, Giladi M, Simkin A, et al. The area moment of inertia tibia: a risk factor for stress fractures. J Biomech 1989; 22:1243-8.

Nunamaker

Age and disease related changes in the mineral on Aging and Bone Quality, National Institute Maryland, 1992:22.

Heaney RP. Is there a role for bone quality on aging and bone quality. National Maryland, 1992:14. Lancet.

fractures:

bone

Margulies activity adults.

Elkanovitch scintigraphic

of porosity

and

in the density Ca/cit Tiss Jnt/

and classification J NucI Med

of 1987;

28:452-7.

ThE

JOURNAL

OF BONE

AND

JOINT

SURGERY