1 Observational and modeling constraints on global ... - Helen Amos

3 downloads 1634 Views 446KB Size Report
Mailing address: 29 Oxford Street,. 30 ... Email: [email protected]. Phone: +1 ..... E., The mass balance of mercury in the springtime arctic environment.
1

Observational and modeling constraints on global anthropogenic enrichment of

2

mercury

3 4

Helen M. Amos1*, Jeroen E. Sonke2, Daniel Obrist3, Nicholas Robins4, Nicole Hagan5, 5 Hannah M. Horowitz6, Robert P. Mason7, Melanie Witt8, Ian M. Hedgecock9, Elizabeth S. Corbitt6, Elsie M. Sunderland1,10

6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

1

Harvard University, School of Public Health, Department of Environmental Health, Boston, MA, USA 2 Laboratoire Géosciences Environnement Toulouse, Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées, CNRS-IRD-Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France 3 Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV, USA 4 North Carolina State University, Department of History, Raleigh, NC, USA 5 Environmental Health Council, Durham, NC, USA 6 Harvard University, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Cambridge, MA, USA 7 University of Connecticut, Department of Marine Sciences, Groton, CT, USA 8 University of Oxford, Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, Oxford, Englandg 9 CNR-Institute of Atmospheric Pollution Research, Rende Division, Rende, Italy 10 Harvard University, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, MA, USA

24 25

SUPPORTING INFORMATION

26 27

Includes three tables, one figure, and is 15 pages in length.

28 29 30 31 32

* Corresponding author: Helen M. Amos. Mailing address: 29 Oxford Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 02143. Email: [email protected]. Phone: +1 (617) 496-5348. Fax: +1 (617) 495-4551.

1

33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43

Table S1. Hg accumulation rates and enrichment factors from lake sediment and peat archives Table S1 is provided in a separate Excel spreadsheet due to its size. Caption for Table S1. Compilation of published peat and lake sediment Hg accumulation rates1-32. Enrichment factors (EFs) are calculated based on relative changes in accumulation rates. Missing values indicate that the data was not available or could not be extracted with confidence from the original publications.

2

44

Table S2. Measured Hg concentrations in background soils

Region Europe Sweden Sweden Norway

Date(s)

Depth (cm)

1983 - 1984

not reported

1960 - 1964

between ~5 to 10c

Austria

Mean soil Hg concentration g-1 dry weight)

Number (μg of samples

Reference

0.25 ± 0.09a 0.06b 0.19 (min: 0.02, max: 0.55)

363 273 ~700

Hakanson et al.33 Andersson34 Lag and Steinnes35

0.10b

33

Wimmer and Haunold36

0.33 (min: 0.08, max: 0.68) 0.12 (min: 6e-4 - 0.72)

> 24

Buchtová et al.37d

> 24

Buchtová et al.37

Czech Republic Czech Republic

not reported

O-horizon

not reported

mineral soils (including Ahorizon)

Germany

1996, 1998

0 to 60

Up to 0.5 in Oa-horizon

9

Schwesig and Matzner38, Schwesig et al.39

0 to 25

range of means from 5 zones: 0.13 - 0.28e

775

Nater and Grigal40

75 to 100

range of means from 5 zones: 0.02 - 0.03

465

Nater and Grigal40

North America Michigan, not reported Minnesota, Wisconsin, USA Michigan, not reported Minnesota, Wisconsin, USA

3

Mean soil Hg concentration g-1 dry weight)

Number (μg of samples

Region

Date(s)

Depth (cm)

Reference

Canada & USA USA

2004

min: 0.02, max: 0.14 range of means from 14 sites: 0.009 - 0.25

>1500

Grigal41, Woodruff et al.42

2007 - 2009

A-horizon, Chorizon 0 to 20

168

Obrist et al.43

USA

2007 - 2009

20 to 40

range of means from 13 sites: 0.007 - 0.13

156

Obrist et al.43

conterminous USA

2004 - 2010

0 to 5

0.05 ± 0.8 (min:

Suggest Documents