Atomization Simulations

53 downloads 0 Views 3MB Size Report
Nov 13, 2014 - Continental AG. Large database on few injectors: •Real geometry. •Real needle lift (X Ray in ANL ). •Atomization visualisation. •Large spray ...
Powertrain – Clean Power Large Eddy Simulations for atomization and spray Dr J. Hélie, Advanced System Engineering N. Lamarque, M. Khan, J. Chesnel*, N. Lu** * Altran Sud ouest www.continental-corporation.com

** also CORIA, Rouen Division Powertrain

Context Automotive trends Diesel Engine

10.0

LEVII ULEV

7.5

PM [mg/km]

Gasoline Engine

LEVIII 2025 (SULEV30)

2.5

2.5 NOx [mg/km]

1.5

1.0

US Tier 2 Bin 5

0.5

50

100

CO [g/km]

200

150

NOx [mg/km] 2.5

2.0

1.5

1.0

0.5

US Tier 2 Bin 5

50 Euro 6

50

Grams CO2 per Kilometer normalized to NEDC

200

Euro 5+6

200

250

Total HC / NMOG [mg/km]

NMHC /NMOG [mg/km]

Normalized cycles

Solid dots and lines: historical performance Solid dots and dashed lines: enacted targets Solid dots and dotted lines: proposed target

US-Car

140

EU

WLTP_Ver5.3 FTP cycle US Highway cycle NEDC

Japan

120

China

200

S. Korea India

180

100

Canada-Car Australia

80

160

60

140

40

120

100

80 2000

EU 95 gCO2 g/km Phasein 2020 – 2021 2005

2010

2015

20

0 2020

[1] China's target reflects gasoline vehicles only. The target may be lower after new energy vehicles are considered.

Dr J. Hélie LES4ICE 2014 2

150

150

200

220

100

100

Particle number limit for EU 6 2017 : 6 * 1011 [particles/km]

150

240

50

Euro 5

100

250

LEVIII 2025 (SULEV30)

5.0

CO [g/km] 2.0

PM [mg/km]

LEVII ULEV 7.5

5.0

2.5

10.0

November 13, 2014 Jérémy Chesnel, © Continental AG

2025

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

Context Particle Number emission: where does soot has its origin

Refined Simulations tools are required for predictive injection system design Large Eddy Simulations is one of this tool. Dr J. Hélie LES4ICE 2014

Computational Strategy Strategy of weak coupling Ligaments (Output Simulation1)

Simulation N°1 Internal Flow with cavitation and primary Break-Up

Simulation N°2 Spray Larger domain, Larger mesh Drops only

Dr J. Hélie LES4ICE 2014 4

November 13, 2014 Jérémy Chesnel, © Continental AG

Break-Up analysis module Drops (Inputs Simulation2)

Database from collaborative project (Gasoline Direct Injection) MAGIE XL3.0 test injector

Multiple holes

« MAGIE » project Funding: FUI (French government)

Metering hole

Dr J. Hélie LES4ICE 2014 5

November 13, 2014

© Continental AG

External domain

Large database on few injectors: •Real geometry •Real needle lift (X Ray in ANL ) •Atomization visualisation •Large spray visualisation •PDA….

Database from collaborative project (Gasoline Direct Injection) MAGIE XL3.0 test injector

Multiple holes

Injection Mach number Spray Plume angle Re_nozzle, We_nozzle Density ratio Typical Stokes number needle opening time / Hole flow time

Dr J. Hélie LES4ICE 2014 6

November 13, 2014

© Continental AG

0.3-0.8 ~15° ~2.105-8.105 609 1…100 250-500

« MAGIE » project Funding: FUI (French government) Large database on few injectors: •Real geometry •Real needle lift (X Ray in ANL ) •Atomization visualisation •Large spray visualisation •PDA….

Computational Strategy OpenSource development platform OpenFOAM Full purpose.

Atomization Simulations

Parallel tools. Free Open Source code. Compressible solver Colocated Pressure/velocity 2nd order Spatial scheme from Demirdzic, I. et al, 1993* First order Euler explicit time scheme Subgrid kinetic energy balance equation Two phase : liquid & vapor ; 1 fluid Interphase dynamic : VOF** Cavitation model: infinitivelly fast or finite rate from N. Lu * Wrongly named ‘PISO’ in OpenFoam librairies; analogous of SIMPLE –for compressible, transonic & barotropic flow. ** Model from Weller, H. & al, based on explicit perfect gaz/Barotropic equations

Dr J. Hélie LES4ICE 2014 7

November 13, 2014

© Continental AG

Special aknowlegement to TGCC, PRACE and GENCI for their support for parrallelisation effort: • Speed up Up to 512 processor • But limited by case dependency • Additional effort under progress

Atomization Simulations Animation @ fuel pressure 90bar

Dr J. Hélie LES4ICE 2014 8

November 13, 2014 © Continental AG

Atomization Simulations Basic Features: mushroom shape during opening at reduced pressure

SAE 2010- 01-2247 Diesel hole @reducedP XL3 visualisation, Toulouse Initial Transient withOpenFOAM LES-VOF (constant lift – artificial)

Qualitative, semi-artificial but this feature seems well captured Dr J. Hélie LES4ICE 2014 9

November 13, 2014

© Continental AG

Atomization Simulations Basic Features: the role of collapse of bubbles in the atomization

Collapse plays a role – but together with other process: instabilities with high shear, vortex cavitation . See N. Lu et al., ILASS Europe 2012 ; N. Lu, Atomization & Spray 2015 Dr J. Hélie LES4ICE 2014 10

November 13, 2014

© Continental AG

Atomization Simulations Validation at different Pressures 5 bar

The simulations predicts well:

90 bar Seat side

Sac side

α=40°

The main liquid core

Exp α=21°

The side jets with small drops The ligaments and drops

CAVITATION

α α=40° α=21°

ATOMISATION

Dr J. Hélie LES4ICE 2014 11

November 13, 2014 © Continental AG

LES

Atomization Simulations Injection ending simulation Transient flow are important for the real spray quality

A simplified testcase of needle closure (injection ending) without needle movement is presented here.

Dr J. Hélie LES4ICE 2014 12

November 13, 2014 © Continental AG

Atomization Simulations Injection ending simulation

Hollow corona shape captured at EOI

Too thin film to be captured by the mesh

Ligament structure captured with good characteristic size

Dr J. Hélie LES4ICE 2014 13

November 13, 2014 © Continental AG

Atomization Simulations Injection ending simulation Liquid wetting But the model of static angle has to be reworked

Correct Ligament structures

Dr J. Hélie LES4ICE 2014 14

November 13, 2014 © Continental AG

Simulation coupling Analysis of the atomization results Drop size Probability @100bar 0.4 0.35 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05

Input : Atomizing flow result

Separation

Contiuous core.

Analysis Process

Continous core 2d slice

-4

x 10 2.5

40

2

35

1.5 30 1 0.5

25

0

20

-0.5 15 -1 10

-1.5 -2

5

-2.5 1

1.1

1.2

1.3

0

1.4 -3

x 10

Dr J. Hélie LES4ICE 2014 15

November 13, 2014 © Continental AG

Output : Dispersed spray injection conditions

Ligament break up model

0

Computational Strategy OpenSource development platform OpenFOAM Full purpose. Parallel tools. Free Open Source code. Compressible solver Colocated Pressure/velocity 2nd order Spatial scheme from Demirdzic, I. et al, 1993* Euler / Lagrange (no evaporation first) 2nd order time scheme Dynamic Smagorinski** Eddy lifetime – like Subgrid Dispersion model** Subgrid 2 way coupling model** * Wrongly named ‘PISO’ in OpenFoam librairies; analogous of SIMPLE –for compressible, transonic & barotropic flow. ** See Khan, M., PhD thesis, Ecole Centrale de Lyon

Dr J. Hélie LES4ICE 2014 16

November 13, 2014

© Continental AG

Spray Simulations

Spray Simulations Validation on quasi-steady state (long injection) Exp

Num

90bar 250 D (5cm distance) Plume center

Plume periphery

Dr J. Hélie LES4ICE 2014 17

13 November 2014

, © Continental AG

What we learn first from these high resolution simulations? ⇒ Where comes the spray angle (& penetration) ?

Coupled Secondary break up

Spray Simulations Identified zones < 5-10 D Drag drop gas Instability of the gas shear layer (1rst instability: round vortices)

Transition to turbulence 50 to 100-150D

Autosimilar powerlaw, gaussian profiles Relaxation to anisotropy ->250D @100bar ->300D @ 200bar

Dr J. Hélie LES4ICE 2014 18

November 13, 2014 , © Continental AG

Spray Simulations Validation on transient Experimental

Simulation

10cm

Qualitative agreement. The role of the transient effect of needle opening is proven. See Khan, M., PhD thesis, Ecole Centrale de Lyon Dr J. Hélie LES4ICE 2014 19

November 13, 2014 Jérémy Chesnel, © Continental AG

Spray Simulations Analysis of transient : Q criterion Spray simulation

Qcriterion

10cm

The specific dynamic of the spray tip is visible. See Khan, M., PhD thesis, Ecole Centrale de Lyon Dr J. Hélie LES4ICE 2014 20

November 13, 2014 Jérémy Chesnel, © Continental AG

Conclusions LES simulation method validated on multi-hole injector XL3.0 vs experimental spray bench images and PDA data, for 100 and 200bar Complementary to industrial fast RANS approach, LES - VOF method seems to be able to capture the primary breakup and support its understanding A complete toolchain has been developed for practical applications using weak coupling LES – Lagrangan, despite its intrinsic limits, returns acceptable JPDF using quite simple models Clarification of Drops spray / gaseous jets, an old question, is proposed for the regimes which are studied here. Realistic spray, including transients, can be simulated.

Further academic modeling effort on dispersion and 2-way coupling with large interphase velocity is needed.

Dr J. Hélie LES4ICE 2014 21

November 13, 2014 Jérémy Chesnel, © Continental AG

Suggest Documents