Brouwer's Fixed Point Theorem with Isolated Fixed Points and ... › publication › fulltext › Brouwers-... › publication › fulltext › Brouwers-...by Y Tanaka · 2012 · Cited by 1 — Sperner's lemma which is used to prove Brouwer's the- orem, however, can be .
Research Article Brouwer’s Fixed Point Theorem with Isolated Fixed Points and His Fan Theorem Yasuhito Tanaka Faculty of Economics, Doshisha University, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8580, Japan Correspondence should be addressed to Yasuhito Tanaka,
[email protected] Received 2 October 2011; Accepted 10 November 2011 Academic Editor: T. Karakasidis Copyright © 2012 Yasuhito Tanaka. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. We show that Brouwer’s fixed point theorem with isolated fixed points is equivalent to Brouwer’s fan theorem.
1. Introduction It is well known that Brouwer’s fixed point theorem cannot be constructively proved. Kellogg et al. [1] provided a constructive proof of Brouwer’s fixed point theorem. But it is not constructive from the view point of constructive mathematics a´ la Bishop. It is sufficient to say that one-dimensional case of Brouwer’s fixed point theorem, that is, the intermediate value theorem is nonconstructive (see [2, 3]). Sperner’s lemma which is used to prove Brouwer’s theorem, however, can be constructively proved. Some authors have presented an approximate version of Brouwer’s theorem using Sperner’s Lemma (see [3, 4]). Thus, Brouwer’s fixed point theorem is constructively, in the sense of constructive mathematics a´ la Bishop, proved in its approximate version. Recently Berger and Ishihara [5] showed that the following theorem is equivalent to Brouwer’s fan theorem. Each uniformly continuous function from a compact metric space into itself with at most one fixed point and approximate fixed points has a fixed point. In this paper we require a more general condition that each uniformly continuous function from a compact metric space into itself may have only isolated fixed points and show that the proposition that such a function has a fixed point is equivalent to Brouwer’s fan theorem. In another paper we have shown that if a uniformly continuous function in a compact metric space satisfies stronger condition, sequential local non-constancy, then without the fan theorem we can constructively show that it has an exact fixed point (see [6]).
2. Brouwer’s Fixed Point Theorem with Isolated Fixed Points and His Fan Theorem Let X be a compact (totally bounded and complete) metric space, x be a point in X, and consider a uniformly continuous function f from X into itself. According to [3, 4] f has an approximate fixed point. It means the following,
For each ε > 0 there exists x ∈ X such that x − f (x) < ε. (1) Since ε > 0 is arbitrary, inf x − f (x) = 0.
x∈X
(2)
The notion that f has at most one fixed point in [5] is defined as follows. Definition 1 (at most one fixed point). For all x, y ∈ X, if x= / x or f (y) = / y. / y, then f (x) = Now we consider a condition that f may have only isolated fixed points. First we recapitulate the compactness of a set in constructive mathematics. We say that X is totally bounded if for each ε > 0 there exists a finitely enumerable ε-approximation to X. (A set S is finitely enumerable if there exist a natural number N and a mapping of the set {1, 2, . . . , N } onto S.) An ε-approximation to X is a subset of X such that for each x ∈ X there exists y in that ε-approximation with |x − y | < ε. According to
2
ISRN Computational Mathematics
Corollary 2.2.12 of [7], about totally bounded set we have the following result.
In [8] the following lemma has been proved (their Lemma 4).
Lemma 2. If X is totally bounded, for each ε > 0 there exist . . , Hn , each of diameter less than or totally bounded sets H1 , . equal to ε, such that X = ni=1 Hi .
Lemma 5. Let Y = {0, 1}N , and B a detachable bar for Y . Then, for each x ∈ Y ,
Since inf x∈X |x − f (x)| = 0, we have inf x∈Hi |x − f (x)| = 0 for some Hi ⊂ X such that X = ni=1 Hi . The definition that a function may have only isolated fixed points is as follows. Definition 3 (isolated fixed points). There exists ε > 0 with the following property. For each ε > 0 less than or equal to ε, . , Hn , each of diameter there exist totally bounded sets H1 , . . less than or equal to ε, such that X = ni=1 Hi , and in each Hi if x = / y, then f (x) = / x or f (y) = / y. In each Hi , f has at most one fixed point. Now we show the following lemma, which is based on Lemma 2 of [8]. Lemma 4. Let f be a uniformly continuous function from X into itself. Assume inf x∈Hi f (x) = 0 for some Hi ⊂ X defined above. If the following property holds: for each ε > 0 there exists δ > 0 such that if x, y ∈ Hi , | f (x) − x| ≤ δ and | f (y) − y | ≤ δ, then |x − y | ≤ ε. Then, there exists a point z ∈ Hi such that f (z) = z, that is, f has a fixed point. Proof. Choose a sequence (xn )n≥1 in Hi such that | f (xn ) − xn | → 0. Compute N such that | f (xn )−xn | < δ for all n ≥ N. Then, for m, n ≥ N we have |xm − xn | ≤ ε. Since ε > 0 is arbitrary, (xn )n≥1 is a Cauchy sequence in Hi and converges to a limit z ∈ Hi . The continuity of f yields | f (z) − z