Channelling of high-latitude boundary-layer flow - Nonlinear

3 downloads 0 Views 5MB Size Report
Jan 31, 2008 - land masses and water bodies. ..... within sloping valleys, or land–sea breezes at the head of ...... boundary layer over Baltic Sea ice, Bound.
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 15, 33–52, 2008 www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/15/33/2008/ © Author(s) 2008. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics

Channelling of high-latitude boundary-layer flow N. Nawri and R. E. Stewart Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada Received: 24 August 2007 – Revised: 14 December 2007 – Accepted: 21 December 2007 – Published: 31 January 2008

Abstract. Due to the stability of the boundary-layer stratification, high-latitude winds over complex terrain are strongly affected by blocking and channelling effects. Consequently, at many low-lying communities in the Canadian Archipelago, including Cape Dorset and Iqaluit considered in this study, surface winds for the most part are from two diametrically opposed directions, following the orientation of the elevated terrain. Shifts between the two prevailing wind directions can be sudden and are associated with geostrophic wind directions within a well defined narrow range. To quantitatively investigate the role of large-scale pressure gradients and the quasi-geostrophic overlying flow, an idealised dynamical system for the evolution of channelled surface winds is derived from the basic equations of motion, in which stability of stationary along-channel wind directions is described as a function of the geostrophic wind. In comparison with long-term horizontal wind statistics at the two locations it is shown that the climatologically prevailing wind directions can be identified as stationary states of the idealised wind model, and that shifts between prevailing wind directions can be represented as stability transitions between these stationary states. In that sense, the prevailing local wind conditions can be interpreted as attracting states of the actual flow, with observed surface winds adjusting to a new stable direction as determined by the idealised system within 3– 9 h. Over these time-scales and longer it is therefore advantageous to determine the relatively slow evolution of the observationally well-resolved large-scale pressure distribution, instead of modelling highly variable surface winds directly. The simplified model also offers a tool for dynamical downscaling of global climate simulations, and for determining future scenarios for local prevailing wind conditions. In particular, it allows an estimation of the sensitivity of local lowlevel winds to changes in the large-scale atmospheric circulation.

Correspondence to: N. Nawri ([email protected])

1

Introduction

Strong and variable surface wind conditions are among the main weather hazards in the Arctic. They cause dangerous flying conditions, significant low-level visibility reduction in blowing snow and, through snow accumulation, may block roads and bury entire buildings. Near the coast, where most communities are located, strong and variable surface winds often have a significant impact on sea state and sea ice conditions, affecting again important transport and travel routes. Due to these hazardous impacts there are concerns about changing prevailing local wind conditions in the context of global environmental change. Already, vulnerabilities and limits to adaptive capacity due to stronger and more variable surface wind conditions have been identified in some communities of Canada’s Nunavut Territory (Ford et al., 2006a; Ford et al., 2006b; Henshaw, 2006; Laidler and Elee, 2006). The prevailing surface wind, and to some degree general weather conditions, at many Arctic communities are affected not only by the proximity to the sea, but also by the surrounding terrain. As a result, orographic modification of low-level winds and particularly blocking and channelling effects on stably stratified flow are noticeable in the prevailing wind conditions at many locations of the Canadian Arctic (Hudson et al., 2001), such that surface winds for the most part are from two diametrically opposed directions, and shifts between the two prevailing wind directions can be sudden. In that context, channelling refers to flow conditions under which wind directions are approximately perpendicular to the local elevation gradient. Due to the sparse available data, detailed modelling of the wind field at specific high-latitude locations is not practicable on an operational basis, particularly over complex terrain. Given the importance of strong and variable surface winds across the Arctic, the goal of this study therefore is to develop a simple conceptual model for stably stratified orographic boundary-layer flow, which can be implemented for shortterm local wind forecasting and downscaling of large-scale climate predictions more easily than high-resolution numerical simulations. Thereby, the focus is on large-scale driven

Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union and the American Geophysical Union.

Q

Q

410

QRS

B

& :,

D+ 0>

,4C

E JD

>.

44

C@/

E LD

2/-4C

& /0 / K ->4. ,1 6/ 4

210,61

2

+,

UIUT

K-> .

!"#"$"

6)7 BBDE

8,*

UIU

+4

TT

RQ

TOY

UIU TRR

#8!8

,#

9:

!-, ' 7 ;!

RTW

#, 2- 8+ J+ 06/

BDDE

I)6C;+ %@:J,164, RPSIH

RQY

21I#

,0>+ 91I& H W WUTI

1/4

QU

WU

OOQ

RRO

0

. .I/ + K-> 0+45 ,3

0 7+ )6 W 5+ UIVR

30

TS

*,>C=I9/-41,64 WSVIH

#,

TPT

UIU

PS

4IM, K>+ VIH UQ

>>+

SR

P

*,

D

!"#$% BCK CKD

GDE

FIK2RS

"U./S=M23/.V5M0=.>

OU

VS

=

&

Q

IB :61+ X VIH OS

6>> /50.>

2X `5 ;< Q 7O4

T45 #
A5 -=@ #0?3=5//5 50 ,+ ; %:'!)

Y

"

),

#

!

'

7

$

"

&

!

&

%

:,

Baker Lake

4

I#,

8+I'

41,

45 =/M 2; =M D+ 0>

8+

I(

06+

,4C

2/-4C

E0/D 6 @ :+0 *,=

B-

RPS

C@/

4

210,61

06/

&&

HDE

8)-**9:));#%))$?#)@A##7)67)B6C?$)5D)E171F1G)H1$A%12)B#&5A%I#&)E171F1:

R

)*+,%-./0$%1#.*2'-/*'/&#'#(#/34/5621*'"%/#'(/7%66*.264/%S50/5O+

>+=

, 1I& -4 H 9/ ROVI UI

:6C

7, ;, A4 ,= >+ * 076> L%D+ VIH ? 41I IRO 9/ IIIIIIU I I II

IDE

UIYY

1

Iqaluit

E

$

JD

# , 8 +4 B - 0 / OQU

M0 &H

/F + Cape Dorset RVO &

E

KD

(

2

QS

E/F+ * , @ 64

E

#,

5+

? Clyde River ,7

E KD

OWT

VIT

=

VIU

N-++4 9,C K->.

R

WU

C=

VIT

&=J0+@@ TWO UISPVIH IB6>>@ UIYUS

Q

21

UIO

WVW

UIQRW

UIUY

SO

*,

Baffin Island

/.

R

WY G,H+@ *,=

S

.64

/0

,C

D0

#,

*,= -C@/4

. *,

Pond Inlet

*/ /1: 6,

658 D7 += 6C> ,& &: 41I&H 9/-ROVI UI S ,7, UIUU A4; = *, 76>>+ L%D+0 IH 1I? IROV 9/4 IIIIU IIIIII

4

O

6@

+>

E0/D 6 @ :+0 *,=

B-

UIPY

UIPR

RPS

4

-4 C

!/

E

45 =/M 2; 0=M !/M

1

5/ X54M1 QO 7O4

SIRUW

E

7

)

6

!)* 7;,"

CDE

!8

)! 6

)

+

)* $+

"!

" 78

)

!'

(

-

,)

%&

'

!

+

TPR

'()*+&,(-.*

,4

W

9/-4 1 &/>-H SITQT D6, IH

BCD

SR

2

IK-

=I/. IE-4

Y

Q

@+4

S

&H

E /F

RVO

OV

ROO

Study Domain VIUQ

4

R

SIU

4I(

6@

WTR

/.

UISTP

()*** 045$)#2#31$657 +)*** ,)*** -)*** .)(** .)*** /** (** ,** -** .** *)0#1)2#3#2

222Y 22; A55 > 1< / 2222 4.005 227O 4 QO

,7

1+ 0II 2/

QQP

!"#$"%&!"#$%#&'

F/

-4C

*,

QY

PUO

V

=

!H

*,

?

#,8+ 965 : 6; ,

QIYU

SIPO

DE

?6

K->.

RQS

BF

E

4

E / F+ * , @64

TO

VIP

UIYYR

VI

VIVU

..6

#, 45 ,@

61

.A P5 / 7O4 Q

+>

"

0,

U

SIYV

>M

BL D

*,

,

VITO

B+5,1+II210

E 9 ,603 QI /-4 +, R R 1, 1 : SI 64 +0 H [


: >64 1/ 58 &

!

,

I%I&

I! I$

II2/- 4C

RPS R

I(

410, 222YA 45 55 22; + > 1< 222222 /4. UI 22227O 005 UQ S 4 QO

I%IE

I(

VI

T

#,45 ,@1+0

UIPRS

N-++4 9,C K->.

V

UIOT

&:,44+>

*//1:6,

& /0 / K ->4. ,1 6/ 4

S

TS

@5 / 76>>+ -41 9+> ,

QY

TO

V

ROO +4IK

!"

UIPYO G/4+@II2/-4

M6

FD

,4

!-

-

-0

TV

V

!"

UIPYO

G/4+@II

0,

UI

/ 01

21

-.

+

,

#

DE

DE

?6F

$

5> + 9,

8, #8!

+,

TS

E 9 ,603 QI /-41 +, RR ,6 1: SI 4 +0 H

DE

1

VIVUY

21

TTR

%*

'

*

5

8,

=/M4

)7

2;

!+ 7;# $ ! ,!'" !

9L&

*

2+

UIT

VI

@8

!

/0

@ 21 0

%&

DE

%6

0=M

BJ

BK

BK

>,

7a

)

!/M

!-

JD

E JD

.

BL

,,

,

$,0+

"

!

9:

$

Y6

8^

21 0

>-0

61

&

E

,"

$

-.

,

0,

!)

BID

#

!

"

2+

21

IDE

#

(

,

/> 4I

+

45

!

" 8, ! #8

*

7#

X

#6 45

# * +,-I 45P 15 IH 2; 5P 5 H 2;

RQS

BLC KFC

JGF HFC

/ X54M15 O 7O4Q

WY

R

showed that at Payerne, between the Jura MountainsYQ and the flow channelled between two approximately parallel TPoroUR Q 9/ WU R @ &/>--41 SO UIU G,H+ UIU SITQ HD6, Swiss Alps, shifts between graphic barriers, such as within valleys or fjords, and on sud*,= channelled surface wind direcTIH . VIV / 6>> >.I 5+ UY !"#"$" WVW K- 30+4 +IB RW :61 tions statistically occur with overlying wind directions den shifts between along-channel UIVap- 21I#, X VIH SIRU wind directions. S W = O TPT >>+ 1/4 IM, proximately perpendicular to the predominant orientation1I&of Previously, Gross and Wippermann (1987) showed that*,>C=I9/-41, ,0>+ +4 K> VIH 9 TIH 64 Q U WU even in the broad Upper Rhine Valley Germany withWSVITOYH the valley. This suggests that under those circumstancesRQWcouTW UIQR of Y W &=J0+@@IB O SR P UISPV 6>>@ WU IH IU U pling of different layers and turbulent momentum transferQU SO modest local relief, large-scale pressure-driven channelling UIYUS V !"#"$" TRR from the overlying flow also plays ;+ an important role. As a remay be the dominant forcing mechanism6 )under 7 8 , * stable win64,I)6CSIH RQY %@:J,1 RP S # RTW P 8 " # !8,# !"#$%#&' Q UIU 9: !-, ' ! 2 - , 8 + component of channelledOOflow sult, is mintertime conditions.!"#$"%& Statistically, shifts between channelled 7 ; ! the ageostrophic J+ RRO 06/ ()*** 045$)#2#31$657 0 imised. Weber and Kaufmann (1998) compared the relative wind directions in that+)*** area therefore occur with approxOWT ,)*** -)*** importance of different forcing imately along-valley geostrophic wind directions. Under # , 8/+4 mechanisms for channelled !"#$% .)(** B-0 OQU D BCK CKD FIK2RS 1,06/ '4 flows in several Alpine valleys. They found that local wind those circumstances the.)*** low-level flow within the valley may 8+I I#, "U./S=M23/.V5M0=.> /** conditions under the influence of essentially the same overly(** have a significant component opposite to the overlying quasi,** + 6 ing flow can vary significantly between nearby locations, and 0 geostrophic flow. By means of numerical simulations, the -** I( 8+ .** #, are determined by differences in the local terrain, such as valauthors also showed that under stable conditions an along*)0#1)2#3#2 8)-**9:));#%))$?#)@A##7)67)B6C?$)5D)E171F1G) ley orientation, length, width, and depth. In particular, they valley jet below ridge-top level can form if the geostrophic found that winds in narrow valleys with widths of about 2– wind is '()*+&,(-.* steady and perpendicular to the predominant orien'()*+&/.)01$234'(*+&5670"81$##" 3 km are more strongly affected by regional temperature gratation of the valley. The relative role of large-scale pres)*+,%-./0$%1#.*2'-/*'/&#'#(#/34/5621*'"%/#'(/7%6 dients than in wider valleys. Also, in short and narrow valleys sure gradients in comparison with other forcing mechanisms &#'#(# 829'./:2+#' and with strong overlying flow, downward momentum transin the broad Tennessee Valley of the United States was in)5WU.A>Q4Q2Q2"02*_7T5/P=445 ditions relative to local thermal effects was also discussed by mentum transfer was also found to be important under con9>00. Then S(D)=0, and u0 =u(D)≈v g (D)=v g (z0 ), where, as discussed in Sect. 3, it was assumed that the flow at ridgetop level is approximately geostrophic. However, low-level speed maxima are a common occurrence within the stable high-latitude boundary-layer (e.g., Br¨ummer and Thiemann, 2002; Br¨ummer et al., 2005; Nawri and Stewart, 2006). In these cases, a logarithmic wind profile is not a valid representation of the low-level shear. A more general description of the vertical dependence of ensemble-averaged horizontal velocity, including also the presence of low-level speed maxima, is given by the shear profile δ1 (D−z0 ) D

δ2 (D−z0 )

−1 e D −1 S(z )= (22) −ε , δ 1 e −1 eδ2 − 1 where δ1,2 and ε are positive constants. As for the logarithmic wind profile, S(D)=0, and u0 =v g . Vertical profiles of 0

e

www.nonlin-processes-geophys.net/15/33/2008/

43

− tan φg qf −1

π φ∗ π 3π φ∗ g g 2 2 φ = 0 stable φ = π stable

φ∗g

0

LSP VMT

2π φg

LSP VMT

Fig. 9. Schematic representation of the range of stability of channelled surface wind directions over surface geostrophic wind direction as a function of the vertical momentum transfer coefficient q. Also indicated are the ranges of positive contribution to the acceleration of channelled surface winds from large-scale pressure gradients (LSP) and vertical momentum transfer (VMT).

wind speed calculated with (21) and (22) are shown in Fig. 8 for different parameter values. For δ1 =1, ε=0, and zero surface speed a logarithmic-like wind speed profile is obtained which increases rapidly close to the surface and more slowly aloft. For δ1 =2, δ2 =1, ε=0.5, and a surface wind in the same direction as the ridge-top level flow, the vertical wind speed profile is similar to those typically found at Iqaluit under strong northwesterly surface wind conditions in winter, with higher near-surface wind speeds than at ridge-top level (Nawri and Stewart, 2006). Again for δ1 =2, δ2 =1, ε=0.5, but with zero surface speed, a vertical wind speed profile is found similar to those at Iqaluit under strong southeasterly surface wind conditions in summer, with the highest wind speeds at ridge-top level (Nawri and Stewart, 2006). Generally, from (20) and (21) it follows that at any reference height z ≤ D  − w 0 ∂z u0 =q v g −u ,

(23)

with vertical momentum transfer coefficient ! 2S 1 ∂ξ ∂S ∂ q= − w0 0 +w0 ξ , S(z) ∂z ∂z0 z0 =z ∂z02 0

(24)

z =z

which, at a given location and for a particular climatological flow situation, must be determined from observations. In the following section, this will be done based on an analysis of the stability of prevailing wind directions. It is shown that the same value for q is obtained not only for different channelled wind conditions at each location, but also for the two locations considered in this study. Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 15, 33–52, 2008

1$2

142

*

$

-&(.)!&#/0%&'(

*-

*

$

*-

-

#

,-

-

#

,-

,

!

,+

,

!

,+ !#

+ *+

!#

+ *+

* !

"#

#$

%&

$'

&!

(#

'$

!$ )&

* !

"#

#$

!"#$%&'()*+,

%&

&!

(#

'$

!$ )&

!"#$%&'()*+,

102

1.2

*

$

*-

-&(.)!&#/0%&'(

$'

*

$

*-

-

#

,-

-

#

,-

,

!

,+

,

!

,+ !#

+ *+

!#

+ *+

* !

"#

#$

%&

$'

&!

3%$4&5&%6)7"(0%&'()*89!:);)
N. Nawri and R. E. Stewart: Channelling of high-latitude boundary-layer flow

(#

'$

!$ )&

!"#$%&'()*+,

* !

"#

#$

%&

$'

&!

(#

'$

!$ )&

3%$4&5&%6)7"(0%&'()*89!:);)
44

!"#$%&'()*+,

Fig. 10. Evolution of surface wind directions at Cape Dorset ((a) and (c)) and Iqaluit ((b) and (d)), following transitions across zero of stability function σ . Stability is negative (positive) in the first (second) half of the period in (a) and (b), and vice versa in (c) and (d). Colour shading of normalised occurrence is the same as in Fig. 3. The solid white line connects the most frequent wind directions at each hour. The ensemble mean stability function is represented by the dashed white line.

Then, substituting (9), (16), (17), (18), and (23) into (13), the along-channel component of the horizontal equations of motion for channelled flow is approximately given by du =v g · (qc − f n) c−ru , dt

(25)

where r=q+r 0 . Under the assumptions made, channelled flow is therefore mainly affected by the along-barrier components of large-scale pressure gradients and vertical turbulent momentum transfer, and damped by surface drag.

6

Prevailing wind directions

Before analysing the combined effects on channelled flow of along-channel large-scale pressure gradients and vertical momentum transfer, it is instructive to study their isolated effects. 6.1

Large-scale pressure gradients

Similar to the discussion of stagnation pressure gradients in the previous section, with Lagrangian acceleration Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 15, 33–52, 2008

 dt u= − f n · v g c due to along-channel large-scale pressure gradients, it follows that ˙ LSP = −f µ−1 sin φg sin φ (26) (φ) (˙s )LSP = f sg sin φg cos φ , (27) where µ=sg−1 s. Independent of wind speed and large-scale pressure gradients, along-channel wind directions φ={0, π} ˙ LSP = −f µ−1 sin φg cos φ it follows are steady. With ∂φ (φ) that, in the northern hemisphere, φ=0 is a stable equilibrium for 0

Suggest Documents