Climate change impacts on natural resources ... - Wiley Online Library

0 downloads 0 Views 2MB Size Report
Mar 14, 2018 - Survey of India (SOI) Toposheet (1:25,000 scale) and village ca- dastral map; ... map digitization and mosaic sheets also were used. Plot- wise ...
Accepted: 14 March 2018 DOI: 10.1111/lre.12209

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Climate change impacts on natural resources and communities: A geospatial approach for management Adikanda Ojha1 | Ajit Kumar Pattnaik2 | Jajnaseni Rout3 1

ICZMP-SPMU, Odisha, Bhubaneswar, India

2

Retired IFS, Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Odisha, India

Abstract Climate change causes environmental depletion, with threats to the global economy.

Chilika Development Authority, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India

The health and productivity of ecosystems underpin agriculture, with stable ecosys-

Correspondence Jajnaseni Rout, Chilika Development Authority, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. Email: [email protected]

proposes adaptation measures, using geospatial technology, for conserving natural

3

tems being the foundation for economic livelihoods and food security. This study resources and improving livelihoods of the local community from climate change scenarios. Planning, policy decisions and resultant programmes are required for natural resource management, which must be based on broad citizen participation and the engagement of rural communities. The suggested adaptation measures will help the planning system to regulate development of natural resources and the socio-­ economic environment. The major natural resources in the environment are land and water, both of which can be severely degraded by human interventions, as well as climate change. Various thematic maps are prepared with the use of geospatial technology, in order to be helpful for site-­suitability analysis directed to the preparation of land and water management action plans for socio-­economic development. The study area is a micro-­watershed of the catchment of Ansupa Lake in the Cuttack District of Odisha, India. To reduce climate change impacts on natural resources and economic livelihoods, some adaptation measures have been proposed (e.g., 68.9 ha for afforestation.; 13.94 ha for gap plantations and agro-­horticulture; 389.62 ha for farm ponds and renovation of existing ponds for pisciculture and duckery activities, etc.; 11.33 ha for land management, along with five bore wells, eight dug wells, 51 LBS/check dams, and four WHSs, etc., for water management for sustainable use). KEYWORDS

climate, geospatial, LBS, natural resource, Water Harvesting Structure (WHS)

1 | I NTRO D U C TI O N

the developing countries are expected to be affected more than those in developed countries because of their extensive depen-

Watershed management is the rational utilization of land and

dence on climate-­sensitive livelihood options and limited adaptive

water resources for optimum production with minimum hazard to

capacity to adapt to the changes. Although climate change is a

natural resources (Tideman, 1996). Natural climate variability has

global phenomenon, its manifestations and impacts vary locally, as

always been a challenge to human livelihoods. Human-­ induced

do the adaptation capacities, preferences and strategies. Effective

climate change, however, has added a complex new dimension to

planning for climate change adaptation programming requires an

this challenge. Evidence suggests the natural climatic variability,

assessment of local vulnerabilities to bridge the gap between com-

compounded with climate change, will adversely affect millions of

munity needs and priorities at the local level and policy processes

livelihoods around the world (IPCC, 2007a). Rural communities in

at the higher level.

34  |  wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/lre © 2018 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd

Lakes & Reserv. 2018;23:34–42.

|

      35

OJHA et al.

F I G U R E   1   Location map of study area

Climatic stresses and shocks such as sea level rise, flooding and land erosion displace millions of people throughout the world

analysis with qualitative information obtained from primary field survey.

(IPCC, 2007b), with this number predicted to increase because of climate change (Nicholls et al., 2011). Climate-­induced migration is more likely in drought-­and flood-­prone areas, river valleys, low-­lying coastal plains, deltas and small islands, where livelihoods depend on natural resources (McLeman and Hunter, 2010). Fishing communi-

3 | DATA BA S E 3.1 | Primary sources

ties typically live on low-­lying coasts and islands exposed to multiple

Primary data collection was carried out through random sampling

climatic stresses and shocks (Daw et al., 2009), thereby subjecting

method (20% household), participatory rural appraisal (PRA), fo-

them to climate-­ induced displacement and migration. Climate-­

cused group discussions (FGD) and key informant interview (KII)

induced migration may reduce vulnerability or enhance adaptation

method.

to climate variability and change. On the other hand, it may also lead to loss of assets, reduced opportunities and increased vulnerability. Migration outcomes are influenced by the degree to which migrants

3.2 | Secondary sources

depend on the environment for their livelihoods and social factors that mitigate or exacerbate the impacts of climatic stresses and shocks. Sensitivity is the degree to which a system will respond to

• Survey of India (SOI) Toposheet (1:25,000 scale) and village cadastral map;

a given change in climate. It measures, for example, how much the

• High-resolution satellite image (Cartosat II and Quickbird); and

composition, structure and functioning of an ecosystem will respond

• Demographic data from Census of India.

to a given temperature rise.

2 | S T U DY A R E A

4 | M E TH O DS Figure 2 illustrates the geospatial methodology applied for prepara-

The study area is a micro-­watershed of the Ansupa Lake catch-

tion of the maps. The SRTM data download, SOI topographic sheet

ment in the Cuttack District of Odisha, India, situated between

collection, and references with stream and contour lines were used

20°26′37.864″ to 20°29′59.228″ N latitude and 85°34′52.697″ to

to delineate the micro-­watershed boundary. The village cadastral

85°37′19.271″ E longitude. The micro-­watershed is situated in the

map digitization and mosaic sheets also were used. Plot-­wise land

border area of the Banki and Athagarh block of the Cuttack District

detail information known as record of right (ROR) was collected from

(Figure 1). Five villages were selected for this study (Kadalibadi,

the Bhulekh website. Ground control points were collected from the

Podapada, Mahidharpur, Radhadarsanpur and Baidehipur [although

study area for geo-­referencing the cadastral sheets, and Cartosat

the latter is uninhabited]). This study conducted an in-­depth anal-

II satellite images were used to prepare existing land use, geomor-

ysis of the local-­ level vulnerabilities by integrating quantitative

phology, slope, soil and land capability, with visual interpretation

|

OJHA et al.

36      

Data collection

Spatial data

Field work

Non-spatial data SOI data

Primary data

GPS survey

Remote sensing data

SRTM data

Census data

Satellite image

Ground truthing

Georeferencing

Questionnaire

GIS software used

Digitisation

Data processing

Layer superimposing

Data analysis Site suitable for land and water management action plan technique for site-­suitability analysis of the land and water resource adaptation measures.

F I G U R E   2   Geospatial approach for site-­suitability analysis

4.3 | Focused group discussions (FGD) Focused group discussions is also a participatory method of data

4.1 | Sustainable livelihood approach (SLA)

collection becoming increasingly popular as a qualitative research method in social science. Questions focusing on how livelihoods

The concept of sustainable livelihood (SL) is an attempt to go beyond

have been impacted, and how communities were adapting to cli-

conventional definitions and approaches to poverty eradication. It

mate change as they experience it, were also mainstreamed. FGDs

is now recognized that more attention must be paid to the various

can be used to explore the meanings of survey findings that cannot

factors and processes that either constrain or enhance the ability of

be explained statistically, the range of opinions/views on a topic

poor people to make a living in an economically, ecologically and so-

of interest, and to collect a wide variety of local terms. In bridg-

cially sustainable manner. The SL concept offers the prospects of a

ing research and policy, FGD can be useful in providing an insight

more coherent and integrated approach. The main purpose of these

into different opinions among different parties involved in the

participatory assessments is to understand the nature of livelihood

change process, thereby enabling the process to be more smoothly

strategies for different household categories (social differentia-

managed.

tion), their levels of livelihood security, and the principle constraints and opportunities needing to be addressed through programming. This information was also disaggregated by gender and generation (Figure 3).

4.4 | Key informant interviews (KII) Key informant interviews resemble a conversation among acquaintances, allowing a free flow of ideas and information.

4.2 | Participatory rural appraisal (PRA)

Interviewers frame questions spontaneously, probe for information and take notes that are later elaborated. Key inform-

A questionnaire was prepared to determine the socio-­economic sta-

ant interviews are qualitative in-­ d epth interviews with people

tus of the community, using a random sampling method of 20% of

who are familiar with the happenings and goings-­o n in a com-

the total households of each village. The PRA has carried out in each

munity. The purpose is to collect information from a wide range

village. The PRA approach seeks to incorporate the knowledge and

of people, including community leaders, professionals and resi-

opinions of rural people in the planning and management of develop-

dents with firsthand knowledge about a community. The key

ment projects and programmes. It comprises a set of participatory,

informants include individuals inside and outside of the com-

and largely visual, techniques for assessing group and community re-

munities. During the main data collection, the goals of key in-

sources, identifying and prioritizing problems, and appraising strat-

formant interviews were used to collect data on the issues in

egies for solving them. Participatory Rural appraisal is particularly

the research objectives or topics raised by respondents during

interested in ensuring the multiple perspectives existing in any com-

the other data collection methods. Thus, key informant inter-

munity are represented in the analysis and also that the community

views were conducted at a later stage of the main data collection

itself takes the lead in evaluating its situation and finding solutions.

activities.

|

      37

OJHA et al.

Assets Human capital ( Livelihood capabilities)

Economic capital ( Stores & resources)

Security of :

Natural resources Household

Infrastructure Economic and cultural environment

Producing & income activities

Consumption activities

Household

Food Nutrition Health Water Education Shelter Community participation Personal safety

Processing & exchange activities

Context

Livelihood strategy

Livelihood outcome

F I G U R E   3   SL approach adopted from CARE’s livelihood model

5 | R E S U LT S A N D D I S CU S S I O N S

temperature, frequency of calamities and soil erosion were used. These four indicators are important for the micro-­watershed study

The primary goal of micro-­watershed management is to manage water

area context because it is surrounded on three sides by hills and the

supply, water quality, drainage water run-­off and water rights. It also

other by Ansupa Lake. Sediments are discharged from the hills to the

incorporates overall planning processes for the micro-­ watersheds.

lake, resulting in the lake becoming shallower, thereby also affecting

It comprises the planned, coordinated and sustainable use of water

the fish production.

resources, agricultural resources, forest resources and grazing land.

Figure 4 indicates the average annual rainfall variation during

Micro-­watershed development in India is moving towards developing

the years 1987 to 2015. It indicates the annual total volume of rain-

micro-­watersheds to create sustainable livelihood opportunities. Key

fall has decreasing from the year 2005. Although the study area is

features include building on participatory approaches, increasing water

situated on the bank of the Mahanadi River, there is no irrigation

availability, improving degraded environments and choosing sustainable

facility, meaning the people depend on rainfall for agricultural irri-

agricultural activities. Thus, micro-­watershed development is directly

gation. Thus, the irregular rainfall is another indicator for the loss of

dependent on climate parameters such as rainfall and temperature.

cropping.

The major threats to a lake and its surrounding areas are deg-

Figure 5 illustrates the average annual temperature variation

radation of physical habitat, degraded water quality and decreasing

during the years 1987 to 2011. The annual average temperature has

natural/food resources. The sources of these degrading activities are

regularly increasing from the year 2005. It also indicates that the

anthropogenic interference, unregulated agricultural practices, ero-

average annual temperature has regularly increased from the year

sion and deforestation of the catchment area, environmental pollution,

2007 and subsequently decreasing again in the year 2011.

spread of invasive species and unregulated fisheries activities.

5.1 | Indicators of climate change for the study area

5.2 | Climate change perception timelines of local communities

With the goal of the present study being to determine the impacts

Figure 6 defines the perceptions of people regarding climate change.

of climate change on human livelihoods, indicators such as rainfall,

The climate change perception timeline of local communities

|

OJHA et al.

38      

F I G U R E   4   Rainfall distribution pattern

F I G U R E   5   Temperature distribution pattern

TA B L E   1   The soil erosion status of the micro watershed No

Name

Geographical area (ha)

Slight erosion (%)

Moderate erosion (%)

1

Mahidharpur

239.12

39.16

45.47

Severe erosion 0

Very severe erosion (%) 10.88

2

Radhadarsanpur

75.71

0

71.61

0

0

3

Podapada

68.72

62.89

22.26

0

0

4

Kadalibadi

0

78.73

0

0.94

5

Badehipur

70.26

0

2.44

717.4 80.51

8.27

indicates that the climatic variable trends are increasing. The rainfall

calamity also increasing after 1985. The soil erosion process has in-

pattern has become erratic from the year 2005 onwards, with the

creased from the year 1980 (Table 1).

rainfall volume also decreasing from the year 1995. The temperature

Table 2 defines the housing status of the study area, which has

has also increased from 2005 onwards, with the frequency of the

no urban type of household, and which defines the social status

|

      39

OJHA et al. Climate Trends 1960 variables Rainfall Erratic pattern Rainfall Decrease volume Temperature Increase Frequency Increase of the calamity Soil erosion Increase

1970

1980

1990

2000

issues, noting the people depend on rainfall for agriculture activi-

2010– 15

ties. All these problems are interlinked, however, and overall livelihoods depend on appropriate community management of their natural resources.

5.4 | Community adaptations to coping with climate change impacts

F I G U R E   6   Timeline graph of perception of people about Climate Change

Among the use of natural resource management tools for attempting to address vulnerability to climate change, many local-­s cale environmental management measures have been applied around

of the study area communities. Every village has maximum kutcha

the world. The first is soil management approaches for increasing

houses, while Kadalibadi, Mahidharpur and Radhadarsanpur villages

soil stability and productivity, which is a general term involving

have semi-­pucca house.

a range of specific techniques (e.g., fallow cycling, forest buffer-

Table 3 indicates total household can be categorized into five

ing, selective planting, managed grazing). Soil management also is

types of income group. More households in Kadalibadi village are in

recognized as central to combating desertification. Second is the

the less than 250 average monthly income category, as is the case

use of water harvesting techniques as a drought-­p roofing tool to

for Podapada village. Mahidharpur and Radhadarsanpur villages

increase water available for households and irrigation, as well as

have more households in the 250–499 categories. These figures in-

providing a baseline water flow for watershed restoration. Third

dicate that people in Kadalibadi and Podapada villages are economi-

is the intercropping technique of planting selected food crops

cally poorer than those in the other two villages.

within stands of trees, which can provide local communities with added food security and incomes through livelihood diversification, while at the same time working to reduce deforestation and

5.3 | Impact on livelihood

desertification.

Figure 7 highlights the migration status of the study area. The

Adaptation measures focused on enhanced natural resource

community has suffered a heavy agricultural loss because of irreg-

management can also more effectively benefit a community.

ular and non-­m onsoon rainfall, as well as the lack of a marketing

Investing in the natural resource base that sustains their liveli-

strategy. There is no cold storage facility, for example, for stocking

hoods, therefore, can have direct positive impacts on their imme-

vegetables. Thus, in pursuit of better economic benefits, village

diate lives, as well as facilitating long-­term resilience to climate

people are migrating out of the state, while many also are work-

variability. Climate change impacts can be grouped into three

ing inside the state. The analyses of the present study identified

types, namely ecological, economic and social, all being related to

10 major problems in the study area, ranking them within a prior-

natural resources and communities in some manner. After super-

ity of 1–10. The first (and major) problem hampering livelihoods is

imposing present land use/land cover, geomorphology, geology,

natural resource management issues, while the second is irrigation

groundwater prospects, soil and slope layers, a site-­ suitability

TA B L E   2   Housing status study area

House type Homeless Kutcha Semi-­Pucca Pucca

Kadalibadi (%)

Mahidharpur (%)

5

4

76 3 16

Podapada (%)

Radhadarsanpur (%)

0

10

72

57

65

8

36

5

16

7

20

Source: Primary data.

TA B L E   3   Average monthly income for study area Number

Average monthly income

Kadalibadi (%)

1

Suggest Documents