MCP Papers in Press. Published on May 29, 2013 as Manuscript M112.024109
Comparing and Combining CE-ESI-MS and nano-LC-ESI-MS for the Characterization of Post-translationally Modified Histones Bettina Sarg1*, Klaus Faserl1*, Leopold Kremser1, Bernhard Halfinger1, Roberto Sebastiano2 and Herbert H. Lindner1¶ 1
Division of Clinical Biochemistry, Biocenter, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck,
Austria; 2Politecnico di Milano, Department of Chemistry, Via Mancinelli, Milano, Italy.
* These authors contributed equally to this work.
¶
Corresponding author:
Herbert Lindner Ph.D., Biocenter, Division of Clinical Biochemistry Innsbruck Medical University Innrain 80-82 A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria. Phone: 0043-512-9003-70310 Fax: 0043-512-9003-73300 E-mail:
[email protected]
Running Title: Characterization of Modified Histones by CESI-MS and LC-MS.
1 Copyright 2013 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
List of Abbreviations: CE - Capillary electrophoresis CESI-MS - Capillary-electrophoresis electrospray-ionization mass spectrometry CZE - Capillary zone electrophoresis HILIC – hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography HPMC - hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose PEI - polyethyleneimine BGE - background electrolyte EOF - electroosmotic flow
2
Summary
We present the first comprehensive capillary-electrophoresis electrospray-ionization mass spectrometric (CESI-MS) analysis of PTMs derived from H1 and core histones. Using a capillary electrophoresis system equipped with a sheathless high sensitivity porous sprayer and nano-LCESI-MS as two complementary techniques, we characterized H1 histones isolated from rat testis. Without any pre-separation of the perchloric acid extraction, a total of 70 different modified peptides, including 50 phosphopeptides, were identified in the rat linker histones H1.0, H1a-H1e, and H1t. Out of the 70 modified H1 histone peptides, 27 peptides could be identified with CESIMS only and 11 solely by LC-ESI-MS. IMAC enrichment prior to MS analysis yielded a total of 55 phosphopeptides, 22 of these peptides could only be identified by CESI-MS and 19 only by LC-ESI-MS, showing the complementarity of the two techniques. We mapped 42 H1 modification sites, including 31 phosphorylation sites of which eight were novel sites. For the analysis of core histones we chose a different strategy where in a first step the sulphuric acidextracted core histones were pre-separated using RP-HPLC. Individual rat testis core histone fractions obtained in this way were digested and analysed by bottom-up CESI-MS. This approach yielded the identification of 42 different modification sites including acetylation (lysine and Nαterminal), mono-, di- and trimethylation and phosphorylation. When applying CESI-MS for the analysis of intact core histone subtypes from butyrate-treated mouse tumor cells we were able to rapidly detect their degree of modification and found this method very useful for the separation of isobaric trimethyl and acetyl modifications. Taking together, our results highlight the need for additional techniques for a comprehensive analysis of PTMs. CESI-MS has proved to be a
3
promising new proteomics tool as demonstrated by this, the first comprehensive analysis of histone modifications, using rat testis as example.
Introduction
Histones are the most intensively studied group of basic nuclear proteins and of great importance with regard to the organization of chromatin structure and control of gene activity. They are highly conserved during evolution, binding to and condensing eukaryotic chromosomal DNA to form chromatin. The fundamental chromatin subunit is the nucleosome, in which 166 bp of DNA are wrapped around a core histone octamer and a further ~ 40 bp comprises the linker between one nucleosome core and the next. The histone octamer contains two molecules of each of the core histones H2A, H2B, H3 and H4. A fifth type of histone, referred to as linker histone (H1, H5), binds to both the DNA on the outer surface of nucleosomes and to the linker DNA. There are numerous microsequence variants of linker and core histones (except H4) differing only slightly in primary sequence. In rat testis, for example, six somatic H1 subtypes, designated as H1a, H1b, H1c, H1d, H1e, H1.0, as well as germ cell specific subtypes, i.e. H1t, H1T2 and HILS1 have been identified (1-3). Under various biological conditions all histone proteins, linker and core histones, are subjected to post-translational modifications, including phosphorylation, acetylation, methylation, ubiquitination, deamidation, glycosylation, and ADP ribosylation, which have a great influence on the epigenetic control of gene expression (4-6). The multitude of histone proteins resulting from closely related sequence variants and post-translational modifications as well as their highly basic nature combined with hydrophobic properties provides a major analytical challenge in current proteomics research. Over the last several years,
4
considerable efforts have been expended to develop methods to identify the specific sites of histone modifications. Mass spectrometry (MS) coupled to liquid chromatography (LC) is the dominant technique for their characterization (7-14). However, due to the fact that histone proteins contain up to nearly 35% basic amino acids, the analysis of histone peptides is still problematic as digestion with many commonly used enzymes (e.g., trypsin, Lys-C, etc.) causes the formation of many short and polar peptides that poorly interact with the RP material and go undetected by conventional LC-ESI-MS. To overcome this problem, chemical derivatization such as propionylation is often applied (15, 16). Capillary electrophoresis (CE) overcomes this disadvantage as this technique allows separations based on mass to charge ratio of peptides and does not utilize their hydrophobic nature as a separation principle. The methods of electrophoresis and liquid chromatography and their applicability for histone analysis are reviewed in detail by Lindner (17). CE has proven to be a remarkably powerful method in separating individual histones and their modified forms due to their different electrophoretic mobilities. Using a bare fused silica capillary and hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose (HPMC) as buffer additive to avoid undesired protein adsorption different core and linker histones as well as their multiply phosphorylated and acetylated forms were successfully separated by CZE (18-22). So far, no data are published about identification of histone modifications by capillary electrophoresis-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (CE-ESI-MS). The reason why LC is given preference to CE is the difficulty in on-line interfacing of CE with MS that allows stable electrospray processes without compromising the quality of separation or the detection sensitivity. However, CE-MS is a promising technique with constantly increasing importance, which is documented by numerous articles (23-26). Various interfaces have been constructed to improve the CE-ESI-MS coupling (27, 28). Sheathflow interfaces are most widely used and, despite the drawback of diluting the analyte 5
which is inherent to this kind of interface, they offer stable electrophoretic separations and allow greater versatility in the choice of BGE and range of flow rates (29-32). Sheathless interfaces have generated interest as no sheath liquid is added leading to enhanced sensitivity of detection (33, 34). However, they have not been frequently used due to their limited robustness, lack of well-established interfaces and routine analysis protocols. The most widely used method for establishing the terminating electrical contact is coating the outer surface of the CE capillary tip with a conductive material (35-37). Unfortunately, lifetimes of such coatings are generally very limited as they suffer from deterioration under influence of the high voltages applied. A recently published concept of a sheathless interface based on a separation capillary with a porous tip acting as nanospray emitter overcomes these disadvantages (38). The capillary tip is etched using hydrofluoric acid until the capillary wall becomes so thin and porous that an electric contact can be established. The performance of this so-called CESI-MS methodology, which combines low flow characteristics of CE with an integrated ESI source, is described in (39-41). Applications, such as the analysis of intact proteins (42), protein-protein and protein-metal complexes (43) and ribosomal protein digests from E.coli (44) are published. Method-inherent advantages of CESI-MS are highly efficient separations, low flow rates leading to reduced ionsuppression and higher sensitivity (40). Compared with nanoLC, no column equilibration is needed, there are no gradient effects and the instrumentation is less maintenance-intensive. Our group recently described important features of CESI-MS and reported the comparison of this method with LC-ESI-MS for the analysis of a 5% perchloric acid extraction of rat testis consisting mainly of different histone H1 subtypes (39). The performance of both techniques was evaluated regarding analysis time, protein sequence coverage, number and molecular mass distribution of the identified peptides. The CESI-MS method developed provided shorter analysis
6
times, narrower peaks yielding high signals and the identification of a greater number of low molecular mass range peptides compared to LC-ESI-MS (39). In the current study we investigated the analysis of post-translationally modified peptides, particularly phosphopeptides, obtained from endoproteinase Arg-C digested histones from rat testis, since this organ contains the whole set of somatic and germ cell specific H1 histones as well as numerous modified core histone proteins. CESI-MS and LC-ESI-MS were compared regarding number and type of identified modified peptides. Without any pre-separation of the perchloric acid extraction we found numerous known and novel modification sites in linker histones. In addition, IMAC experiments were utilized to enrich phosphopeptides prior to MS analysis. CESI-MS was also used for rapid identification of post-translational modifications of rat testis core histones, which were pre-fractionated by RP-HPLC and digested with Arg-C. Using core histones from butyrate-treated mouse erythroleukemia cells we further demonstrate that our method achieves excellent separations of intact histone subtypes and their multiply modified forms and enables the detection of the extent of PTMs in a fast and reproducible way. Our work represents the first detailed characterization of modified linker and core histone peptides and clearly demonstrates that CESI-MS is a promising alternative tool for epigenetic studies.
Experimental Procedures
Materials. Hydrochloric acid and sodium tetraborate were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). The polyethyleneimine (PEI) coating trimethoxysilylpropyl(polyethyleneimine) was provided by Beckman Coulter (Brea, USA), the coating reagent M7C4I (1-(4-iodobutyl) 4-aza-1azoniabicyclo[2,2,2] octane iodide) was prepared according to Sebastiano et al. (45). All other
7
chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Vienna, Austria). Water was purified with a Milli-Q water purification system (Millipore, Vienna, Austria). Histone Preparation. Nuclei from rat testes (Sprague-Dawley) were extracted with perchloric acid (5%, v/v) for H1 histone preparation followed by 0.2 M sulfuric acid for core histone preparation (46). Mouse erythroleukemia cells were grown and treated with 1.75 mM sodium butyrate (10 h) as described previously (47). Capillary Zone Electrophoresis (CZE). CZE of whole H1 histones was performed on a Beckman system P/ACE 5000 using an uncoated capillary (50 cm in length; 75 µm ID) and a 0.5 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 2.0), containing 0.02% HPMC (21). For the separation of deamidated H1.0, a 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 3.5), containing 0.02% HPMC was used. Enzymatic Cleavage. Histones were digested using endoproteinase Arg-C (EC 3.4.21.35) (1:20, w/w; Sigma-Aldrich) in 5 mM NH4HCO3 buffer (pH 8.0). H1 histones were incubated for 1h at 37°C, core histones were incubated for 30 min at 37°C. Phosphopeptide Enrichment. Immobilized metal-affinity chromatography (IMAC) was performed using PHOS-Select™ Iron Affinity Gel (Prod. No. P9740) and the SigmaPrep Spin column kit (Prod. No. SC1000) both obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Vienna, Austria). 5 µg of Arg-C H1 histone digest were applied and 140 µl 400 mM ammonium hydroxide was used as elution solution. Capillary Electrophoresis-Electrospray Ionization-Mass Spectrometry (CESI-MS). A Beckman Coulter prototype CESI capillary electrophoresis system equipped with a sheathless high sensitivity porous sprayer, was used for peptide separation and ionization upstream from mass spectrometry characterization. Fused silica capillaries (total length: 100 cm, i.d: 30 µm, o.d:
8
150 µm, Beckman Coulter) with a terminal 3 cm long porous segment were inserted into the prototype sprayer interface enabling the electric contact via a secondary capillary (length: 80 cm, i.d: 50 µm, o.d: 360 µm) filled with background electrolyte (BGE). The separation capillaries were modified with three different coatings; one generated a noncharged inner capillary surface, and the other two modifiers generated positively charged surfaces (PEI and M7C4I). A positively charged surface induces a reversed EOF, which is directed to the MS orifice when applying a negative voltage at the CE inlet. The non-charged, neutral surface suppresses EOF. The procedure for PEI coating was: (i) Preconditioning; flushing each for 5 min at 50 psi with methanol, MilliQ-water, 0.1 M NaOH, 0.1M HCl, and MilliQ-water, (porous tip placed in MilliQ-water during this procedure). (ii) Coating; rinsing with methanol (10 min), air (20 min), and 20% (v/v) coating solution in pure methanol (20 min) at 50 psi (porous tip placed in methanol). The coating solution was left in the capillary for 12h. (iii) Postconditioning (next day); flushing each for 20 min at 50 psi with air, methanol and MilliQ-water. Coating with M7C4I was performed according to Elhamili et al. (48) with slight modifications. The capillary was treated 8 min with 0.1 M NaOH and 2 min with 25 mM sodium tetraborate buffer at pH 9 followed by treatment with 4 mM M7C4I modifier solution in 25 mM sodium tetraborate buffer at pH 9 for 20 min. All steps were carried out at 50 psi. The capillary was kept dry until use. The neutral capillary was provided by Beckman Coulter, Inc. Capillary electrophoresis conditions were as follows: The separation capillary and the conductive liquid capillary were rinsed with BGE to refresh the buffer. The sample was injected for 10 sec at 5 psi (7.5 nL), followed by an injection plug of BGE (5 psi for 5 sec). Using positively charged capillaries the separation was performed at -12.5 kV or -25 kV applied in a 0.5 min ramp (reversed polarity mode); 0.1% to 0.6% (v/v) formic acid was used as BGE. Using neutral coated
9
capillaries the separation was performed at +30 kV applied in a 1 min ramp (normal polarity mode) and a pressure gradient applied at the capillary inlet. The gradient profile was: 0-43 min, 0.5 psi; 43-51 min, 2 psi and 51-60 min, 5 psi. Acetic acid 10% (v/v) was used as BGE for separations using neutral coated capillaries. Nano-HPLC. Protein digests were analyzed using an UltiMate 3000 nano-HPLC system (Dionex, Germering, Germany) coupled to an LTQ Orbitrap XL mass spectrometer equipped with a nanospray ionization source. A homemade fritless fused silica microcapillary column (75 µm i.d. x 280 µm o.d.) packed with 10 cm of 3 µm reverse-phase C18 material (Reprosil) was used. The gradient (solvent A: 0.1% formic acid; solvent B: 0.1% formic acid in 85% acetonitrile) started at 4% B. The concentration of solvent B was increased linearly from 4% to 50% during 50 min and from 50% to 100% during 5 min. A flowrate of 250 nL/min was applied. Mass Spectrometry of Arg-C histone digests. The LTQ Orbitrap XL mass spectrometer was operating in data dependent mode to switch between MS and MS² and MS³ acquisition. Survey full scan MS spectra (from m/z 250 – 1800) were acquired in the Orbitrap with a resolution of R = 15,000 (FTMS). Up to three of the most intense ions detected in the full scan MS were isolated and fragmented in the linear ion trap (LTQ) using collision induced dissociation (CID). An activation time of 30 ms was applied in MS/MS acquisitions. Normalized collision energy was set to 35%. The ion selection threshold was 1000 counts with an activation q = 0.25. Single charged ions were excluded from MS/MS. A neutral loss of 49, 32.66 or 24.5 detected in one of the three most intense ions in MS² was decisive for a MS³, which was performed to reaffirm the peptide sequence. Dynamic exclusion was enabled with a repeat count of 2 over a duration of 3 s and an exclusion window of 30 s.
10
Data base search. MS/MS and MS³ spectra were searched against a rat database (rat IPI, version 3.81, 39602 entries) via Sequest, ProteomeDiscoverer (Version 1.3, ThermoScientific). Database search criteria were set as follows: Processing MSn: allowed cleavage sites Lys and Arg; maximum miss cleavage sites 6 (linker histone samples) or 8 (core histone samples); precursor tolerance 10 ppm; fragment mass tolerance 0.8 Da. Variable modifications were acetylation (+42.011) at Lys and N-terminus, phosphorylation (+79.966) at Ser, Thr and Tyr, deamidation (+0.984) at Asn, ubiquitination (+114.043) at Lys, methylation (+14.016), dimethylation (+28.031) at Lys and Arg, and trimethylation (+42.047) at Lys. Up to four modifications were allowed per peptide. For Sequest search the identified peptides were further evaluated using charge state versus crosscorrelation number (Xcorr). The criteria for positive identification of histone peptides were Xcorr > 2.0 for doubly charged ions, Xcorr > 2.5 for triply charged ions, and Xcorr > 3 for fourfold and higher charged ions. Only best matches were considered. Phosphosites were localized at a false localization rate (FLR) less than 5% using phosphoRS site probability ≥ 0.95. The searched peptides and proteins were further validated by Percolator Peptide FDR based on the q-value. Relative peptide quantification was performed using precursor ion areas, which were calculated at a mass precision of 2 ppm. Mass Spectrometry of intact core histones. Approximately 10 ng of each protein fraction prefractionated by RP-HPLC were analysed by CESI-MS. Survey full scan MS spectra (from m/z 300 – 2000) were acquired in the Orbitrap with a resolution of R = 100,000 (FTMS). Protein masses were determined by deconvolution using the integrated Xcalibur Xtract software (ThermoScientific).
11
Results
Occurrence of H1 Subtypes in Rat Testis – CE has already proved useful for the analysis of core and linker histone proteins in order to determine both the proportion of the various subtypes and the degree of post-translational modification (for review, see (17)). To verify the quality and the composition of the linker histone sample prepared by 5% perchloric acid extraction, Figure 1 shows a separation of whole H1 histones isolated from rat testis using CZE with an uncoated capillary and a 0.5 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 2.0), containing 0.02% HPMC. Under these conditions a complete resolution of the six somatic subtypes, designated as H1a, H1b, H1c, H1d, H1e, H1.0, as well as the testis specific subtype H1t could be achieved (21). They are expressed at very different levels and are modified (e.g., phosphorylated) to different degrees. Using hydrophilic-interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) we found that rat histone H1.0 consists of a mixture of intact (H1.0 Asn-3) and in vivo deamidated forms (H1.0 Asp-3, H1.0 isoAsp-3). All three forms appear acetylated and non-acetylated on their N terminus and both the N-terminally acetylated and the deamidated forms accumulate with aging (49, 50). By applying a 0.1M sodium phosphate buffer and increasing the buffer pH from 2.0 to 3.5, we are able to demonstrate for the first time that CE is also capable of resolving these deamidated forms (as shown in the insert of Figure 1). Due to their lower positive charge, the deamidated forms migrate slower than the corresponding non-deamidated protein.
CESI-MS/MS Analysis of Arg-C Digested Histone H1 Peptides – Rat testis H1 histones were digested with endoproteinase Arg-C, which preferentially cleaves after arginine residues although hydrolysis proceeds to a minor degree in most Lys-containing substrates, creating a complex
12
mixture of highly multiply charged H1 peptides with appropriate molecular mass for ESIMS/MS. For CESI-MS analysis, two different types of positively charged coatings were compared, polyethyleneimine (PEI), and 1-(4-iodobutyl) 4-aza-1-azoniabicyclo[2,2,2] octane iodide hereinafter referred to as M7C4I (48). Using diluted formic acid as BGE both surface modifications generate a reversed EOF towards the MS inlet when working in the reversed mode. Under these conditions the positively charged peptide ions migrate towards the cathode inlet and actually out of the capillary. However, due to the positive charge of the modified capillary surface, the magnitude of the EOF generated is much greater than the electrophoretic mobility of the peptides and, therefore, moves the bulk solution towards the inlet of the MS instrument. Figure 2A shows the base peak electropherogram of 300fmol histone H1 digest obtained with the PEI coated capillary, 0.1% formic acid as BGE and a separation voltage of -25 kV. Due to the strong positively charged coating a rather high electroosmotic flow rate of approximately 120135 nL/min is generated resulting in very short migration times (39). The sample was run in triplicate and MS/MS spectra obtained were searched against the IPI-rat database. Within a separation window of about 3.5 min and a total analysis time less than 10 min, 83 histone peptides (71 unmodified/12 modified peptides) could be identified (Figure 5A). Using the same separation conditions but an M7C4I coated capillary, which is less positively charged than PEI and generates flow rates in the range from 96 to 110 nL/min (39), peptides could be identified within an 8.5 min separation window (Figure 2B), yielding 110 histone peptides (92 unmodified/18 modified peptides; Figure 5A). The effect of varying the CE separation voltage from -25 to -10 kV was further investigated. At -12.5 kV, which was found to be the optimum value regarding spray stability and increased separation time, the total number of histone peptides
13
identified could be further improved to 127 (98 unmodified/29 modified peptides; Figure 5A) within a separation window of about 17.4 min (Figure 2C).
LC-ESI-MS/MS Analysis of Arg-C Digested Histone H1 Peptides – For comparison with HPLC, nano-LC-ESI-MS was performed using a homemade fritless column packed 10 cm with 3 µm reverse-phase C18 resin. In Figure 3A, the base peak chromatogram of the histone H1 digest using the same amount of sample as in CESI-MS is presented. After database search, significantly fewer peptides were identified by LC-ESI-MS due to the lower signal intensity (73 peptides; 62 unmodified/11 modified; Figure 5A) than by CESI-MS. As the primary advantage of LC over CE is a much higher mass loading capability, 10 times more sample (3 pmol; Figure 3B) was loaded, permitting the identification of 114 histone H1 peptides (87 unmodified and 27 modified; Figure 5A), similar to the CE result obtained with the 300 fmol sample. In order to identify as many H1 peptides as possible we injected 30 pmol of the Arg-C digest (Figure 3C), a 100-fold increase compared to the CESI-MS analyses. This resulted in broad peaks and yielded a total number of 154 H1 peptides (111 unmodified and 43 modified; Figure 5A). This outcome was significantly better than the result obtained by CESI-MS when the M7C4I coated capillary with 0.1% formic acid as BGE and a separation voltage of -12.5 kV was used and indicates the presence of a number of peptides that could not be identified by CESI-MS.
Improving CESI-MS/MS Analysis of Histone H1 Peptides – In addition to the effect of surface modification and separation voltage on peptide identification by CESI-MS (shown in Figure 2), the influence of buffer concentration was examined. Therefore, the 300fmol histone H1 digest was analysed by increasing the BGE concentration from 0.1% formic acid (Figure 2C) to 0.3% (Figure 4A) and to 0.6% (Figure 4B). As can be seen, higher buffer concentrations produce an 14
increase in separation time, which is related to a decrease in the electroosmotic flow. Using 0.3% formic acid instead of 0.1%, peptides could be identified within a 21.5 min separation window and the number of identified peptides was raised further to 140 different H1 peptides (108 unmodified/32 modified peptides; Figure 5A). A further increase to 0.6% formic acid yielded in a separation window of 25.7 min and 151 identified histone peptides (112 unmodified/39 modified peptides; Figure 5A). This result is comparable to the one when 100 times more sample was analysed by LC-ESI-MS, which clearly shows the importance of an appropriate length of the separation window in CESI-MS due to the limited scan rate of the MS instrument. A further reduction of the EOF can be successfully achieved by using a neutrally coated capillary. Busnel et al. recently demonstrated that neutral capillaries are well suited for the separation of peptide mixtures using CESI-MS (40). The analysis of the 300fmol histone H1 digest was performed using 10% acetic acid as BGE, a separation voltage of 30 kV and a pressure of 0.5 psi applied at the capillary inlet, which is needed to provide a stable spray over the entire duration of the experiment. The resulting base peak electropherogram is shown in Figure 4C. Using this method, 157 H1 peptides could be successfully identified within a 38.5 min separation window (105 unmodified/52 modified peptides; Figure 5A). In order to increase the mass loading of the system, transient isotachophoresis (t-ITP) was integrated as an in-capillary pre-concentration procedure (40). However, applying 10 times more sample (3pmol) did not result in further increase in the number of peptide identifications (data not shown).
Comparing the Results of CE- and LC-ESI-MS Analyses of Modified H1 Histone Peptides - The various analyses of the rat testis histone H1 sample revealed the presence of different types of post-translational modifications including phosphorylation, acetylation and deamidation as well as Nα-terminal acetylation, which is a co-translational process on the nascent polypeptide. Figure 15
5B summarizes the results regarding modified peptide identification (including Nα-terminal acetylated peptides) from six different CE and three LC experiments. The number of modified peptides identified and type of modification can be seen for each method. Using CESI-MS the highest number of different modified peptides was achieved when either a neutrally coated capillary with 10% acetic acid as BGE and a separation voltage of 30 kV (52 modified peptides), or a M7C4I coated capillary with 0.6% formic acid and -12.5 kV was applied (39 modified peptides). Using LC-ESI-MS a comparable number of peptides (154 vs. 157 in CESI-MS) could only be obtained when 100 times more sample was injected than in CESIMS. Even in this case the number of modified peptides was significantly lower (43 vs. 52 in CESI-MS). All mapped sites of post- translational modifications of rat testis H1 histones obtained by CE- and LC-ESI-MS are given in Table 1. Combining all three datasets, each one comprising triplicate runs, a total of 70 different modified H1 histone peptides were identified. All H1 subtypes were found to be acetylated as well as non-acetylated at their N-Terminus (49, 51). The function of this type of modification is still unknown. The majority of the peptides identified (50 out of 70) were phosphorylated. Some of them were common to most of the H1 subtypes, whereas others were restricted to single variants. Furthermore, some peptides were found to be post-translationally acetylated or deamidated. Applying CE- and LC-ESI-MS/MS, the rat testis histone subtypes H1a, H1d, H1e and H1t were found to be modified at multiple sites, whereas only a few sites were identified on H1b, H1c and H1.0. Most of the sites could be identified with both CE and LC, but some were found with one method only. We confirmed all five phosphorylation sites we have recently reported for rat H1t (14) and identified an additional three novel phosphorylation sites in this subtype. Two of these sites could be assigned unambiguously to Ser-40 and Ser-79. Two diphosphorylated peptides of different length (ASRSPKSSKTK and ASRSPKSSKTKVVK) were observed. One already known 16
phosphorylation site was detected on Ser-140. The second site, however, could not be distinguished but was localized to one of three possible amino acids (Ser-143, Ser-144 and Thr146). Furthermore, a novel acetylation site on Lys-170 of H1t could be detected. The novel phosphorylation site on Ser-79 (H1t residue numbering) could also be found for histone H1a, c, d and H1e. This site is outside of the consensus motif of CDK1 ((S/T)PXK), since most of the phosphorylation sites identified in these experiments were found outside CDK-consensus sequences. This further strengthens the notion that histone phosphorylation is mediated by additional kinases targeting still unknown motifs (16, 51). The same is true for a novel non-motif phosphorylation site found on Ser-28 on H1.0. On the basis of peptide identifications obtained (Table 1), we investigated the overlap of the total peptides and of the modified peptides identified between different experiments. First, the overlap of peptides identified with CESI-MS was investigated. As can be seen in Figure 6, the overlap is about 66% for total (Figure 6A) and 54% for modified peptides (Figure 6B) using either M7C4I/12.5 kV/0.6% formic acid or neutral/30 kV/10% acetic acid. When the CESI-MS results are compared with the LC-ESI-MS analysis of the 30 pmol sample, the overlap decreases to only 46% ( M7C4I) and 47% (neutral), respectively, for total peptides (Figure 6A) and to 37% (M7C4I) and 51% (neutral), respectively, for modified peptides (Figure 6B). Out of the 70 modified H1 histone peptides, 22 peptides could be identified either way, additional 7 with CESIMS using the M7C4I coating, 10 with CESI-MS using the neutral capillary and 11 by LC-ESIMS. With this approach, we identified 33 modification sites including 8 novel histone marks on rat testis H1 histones (Table 1, highlighted in grey). Out of these 33 sites, 6 sites were only identified by CESI-MS using the neutral capillary, just one with the M7C4I coated capillary and 5 solely by LC-ESI-MS (Figure 6C). These results suggest that both techniques possess
17
complementary properties and that no one of the investigated methods alone is sufficient, by itself, for a comprehensive analysis of peptide modifications.
Post-translational modification sites on non-histone proteins - The histone H1 sample contained other modified proteins which were co-extracted with linker histones, including Hmgn1, HMGI/HMG-Y, Nuclear ubiquitous casein and cyclin-dependent kinase substrate 1, Trip12 protein, PC4 and SFRS1-interacting protein, Serine/arginine repetitive matrix protein 1 and 5'nucleotidase cytosolic IB. A list of phosphorylated peptides found in the non-histone fraction is shown in the supplemental section (Table S-1). Despite the fact that 100 times more material was injected, the highest number of phosphopeptides was again achieved by CESI-MS using the neutral capillary (27 phosphopeptides), whereas the high sample load LC-ESI-MS analysis yielded just 9 phosphopeptides. As a result of this investigation, several phosphorylation sites that have been reported in other species but not in rat were identified. Moreover, two novel phosphorylation sites on 5'-nucleotidase cytosolic IB could be detected (details shown in Table S1). In order to compare relative peptide signal intensities eight phosphopeptides identified with both CE- and LC-MS were evaluated (supplemental Figure S-1). With one exception the peptide intensities are lowest in CESI-MS using the M7C4I coated capillary and highest in LC-ESI-MS. A detailed comparison about complementary peptide identification in CE and nano-LC is described in the discussion section.
Comparison of CE- and LC-ESI-MS analysis of IMAC enriched phosphopeptides – We have also studied the suitability of CESI-MS for the analysis of phosphopeptides isolated by IMAC. For this purpose, 5 ug Arg-C digested rat testis H1 histones were further purified with IMAC- Fe(III).
18
Due to the low sample complexity the fast CESI-MS method involving an M7C4I coated capillary, 0.1% formic acid as BGE and a separation voltage of -25 kV was used (data not shown). With triplicate runs 36 different phosphopeptides could be identified (Table 1). The results obtained by CE were compared with LC-ESI-MS (data not shown), applying the same method as shown in Figure 3. Eleven times more sample was injected in LC than in CE and as a result 33 phosphopeptides were obtained (Table 1). Merging the results of CESI-MS and LCESI-MS a total number of 55 phosphopeptides could be identified, 14 by both methods, 19 by LC only and 22 solely by CE. Two additional phosphorylation sites of H1d could be identified, which were found only with IMAC enrichment. One of which, Ser-186 was found on two low mass peptides by CESI-MS only, and the other, Ser-1 or Thr-3, which could not be unambiguously identified, by LC-ESI-MS only. Very recently, we were able to demonstrate that CESI-MS is especially effective in analysing low molecular weight peptides. These poorly interact with the reversed-phase material and elute in the void volume, so they cannot be detected by LC-ESI-MS (39). This effect should be even more pronounced with small and hydrophilic phosphopeptides. In Figure 7, the number of identified phosphopeptides obtained by CE- and LC-ESI-MS obtained with IMAC is plotted against their molecular mass. As can clearly be seen, more selective isolation of low molecular mass range peptides was observed with CESI-MS compared to LC-MS, e.g. in the mass range from 600 – 1400 Da, 21 peptides vs. 4, whereas LC-MS preferentially enriched larger phosphopeptides, e.g. in the mass range from 1400 – 2400 Da, 27 peptides vs. 11. Comparing the number of phosphopeptides identified, the result is only slightly better than without IMAC enrichment, when 50 phosphopeptides were identified. However, a different set of phosphopeptides was apparently enriched. Out of the 75 phosphopeptides identified in rat testis H1 histone sample, 25 were detected only by IMAC (Table 1). Taking all results together, 29 19
phosphopeptides were obtained by LC and CE, 20 by LC and 26 by CE only. Out of the 23 small phosphopeptides in the low mass range from 600 – 1200 Da, 19 could be identified by CESI-MS only. This result also clearly demonstrates that CESI-MS complements LC-ESI-MS in an ideal manner.
CESI-MS/MS Analysis of Arg-C Digested Core Histone Peptides – For the analysis of core histones we chose a different strategy where in a first step the sulphuric acid-extracted core histones from rat testis were pre-separated using RP-HPLC (supplemental Figure S-2) (46). This procedure allows the separation of the complex core histone family into individual subtypes but permits no resolution of post-translationally modified histones, they elute together with the unmodified parent proteins (52). The collected fractions were subjected to Arg-C digestion and the resulting peptides were analysed by bottom-up mass spectrometry applying CESI-MS using an M7C4I coated capillary, 0.1% formic acid as BGE and a separation voltage of -25 kV. For each sample, approximately 10 ng were injected into the capillary and analysed in a single run of about 20 min (data not shown). The identified histones were H3.1, H3.1t, H3.3, H4 as well as several H2A and H2B subtypes. CESI-MS analysis yielded individual sequence coverages between 61% (H3.1t) and 98.4% (H2A.Z). In total, 77 modified peptides were identified consisting of 54 peptides modified only by acetylation, one peptide by phosphorylation, 14 peptides by methylation only and 8 peptides, which were both acetylated and methylated (supplemental Table S-2). In summary, we identified and located 42 different modification sites including acetylation (lysine and Nα-terminal), mono-, di- and trimethylation. The phosphorylation site was identified at Ser-139 of H2A.X.
20
CESI-MS Analysis of Intact Core Histones – It is an important challenge to detect the degree of modification using larger core histone peptides or even intact proteins. It has been demonstrated by our group that CE offers excellent separation of e.g. multiply acetylated intact core histones (17, 18). We were interested, therefore, in developing a fast and reproducible analytical approach for identifying and measuring intact histone variants and the extent of their PTMs, which is crucial when comparing modification states under different biological conditions. In contrast to histones from organs like liver, kidney, testis etc., which exhibit only a minor degree of acetylation, for this investigation core histones were used from a mouse tumor cell line treated with the deacetylase inhibitor sodium butyrate that produces hyperacetylated species (47). The proteins were isolated using RP-HPLC as shown in supplemental Figure S-2 and further resolved by CESI-MS using the same conditions as described for the core histone peptide analysis. Intact histone H4 was clearly resolved into 5 peaks within 18 min by CESI-MS (Figure 8A). The average deconvoluted intact mass of each peak revealed that CE separated H4 solely by acetylation state into its non-, mono-, di-, tri- and tetraacetylated forms (Figure 8B). As acetylation diminishes the positive charge of the protein, the non-acetylated form has the highest electrophoretic mobility, however, due to the reversed polarity of the separation voltage applied and the countercurrent electroosmotic flow, it shows the slowest migration time. The non-, mono, di-, and trimethylated forms were observed to co-migrate with the different acetylated states as increasing methyl addition does not significantly alter the net positive charge of the histone molecule. The selectivity of this separation is not only leading to less complicated MS spectra but enables the assignment of isobaric trimethyl and acetyl modifications without the requirement of high-resolution mass spectrometry as they can be confidently distinguished because of their different migration time. The application of CESI-MS enables a fast evaluation and quantification of the methylation and acetylation status of H4. Peak 5, therefore, consists of non-acetylated H4 21
that is mainly dimethylated but also mono- and trimethylated to a minor extent. Peak 4, which consists of monoacetylated H4 closely resembles to peak 5. With increasing acetylation the methylation status changes significantly (Figure 9). The higher acetylated peaks 1-3 consist of less trimethylated forms, however, a substantial increase of non- and monomethylated forms is observed. These results are in accordance with previous studies of our group that demonstrated a decrease in the abundance of trimethylation (47) as well as an increase of monomoethylation upon hyperacetylated H4 (53). The RP-CESI-MS assay reproducibility was tested through triplicate analysis of histone H4. The differently acetylated proteoforms can be quantified according to their MS1 precursor intensities with a standard deviation fewer than 3.5% (supplemental Table S-3A), corresponding to a relative standard deviation ranging from 4.7 to 16.0%. The differently methylated H4 forms present in a single peak can be quantified with a standard deviation fewer than 2% (supplemental Table S-3B) based on their deconvolution result. The relative standard deviation ranged from 0.3 to 16.6%, depending on signal height. As a result, the developed CESI-MS methodology has proved to be very reproducible and efficient for assessing the degree of modification of intact H4 (Figure 9). Using the same approach the H2A.2 fraction was separated into four peaks (Figure 8C). Determination of the molecular masses revealed the presence of the H2A.2 variants H2A.2A, H2A.2B and H2A.2C. In detail, peak No.4 contains non-acetylated H2A.2A; No.3, monoacetylated H2A.2A, which is not well separated from non-acetylated H2A.2C; No.2, diacetylated H2A.2A, monoacetylated H2A.2C and non-acetylated H2A.2B; No.1, diacetylated H2A.2C and monoacetylated H2A.2B (supplemental Figure S-3). The CE procedure allows the separation of the variants and their acetylated forms as well as the determination of relative proportions of the different forms.
22
A similar result was obtained when the H2A.1 fraction was subjected to CESI-MS (Figure 8D). In addition to H2A.1 this fraction contains the variants H2A.1H and H2A.X, which elute as a single peak in RP-HPLC. In CE, the three variants were baseline separated from each other and from their different acetylated forms. H2A.1 was found to be mainly non- and monoacetylated, a diacetylated form was detected in very little amounts (supplemental Figure S-4). H2A.X was also non-, mono-, and diacetylated. H2A.1H, present in very low amounts, could still be identified as non- and monoacetylated. CESI-MS of intact H2B resulted in six well separated peaks according to their acetylation status (Figure 8E). The four major molecular masses observed in each peak are very close in mass (separated by 14 – 16 Da) suggesting the possibility that this fraction contains multiple variants of H2B or forms bearing multiple methylations. Top Down MS of human H2B isoforms performed by Siuti et al. (54) proved that the heterogeneity of H2B is due to amino acid sequence and not to methylation. They detected five major molecular masses containing seven distinct H2B variants. The four molecular masses observed in our study can be assigned to the H2B forms H2B.1C, H2B.1F, H2B.1B and H2B.2B, which differ by only one or two amino acids. The treatment with sodium butyrate resulted in increased acetylation of each of the four major peaks. The pattern of increased acetylation of the H2B isoforms is very similar regarding mono-, to di-, tri-, and tetra-acetylation (supplemental Figure S-5). The penta-acetylated pattern differs between the H2B isoforms, but is present in minute amounts only. Finally, the HPLC fraction containing H3.2 and H3.3 was subjected to CESI-MS. The basepeak electropherogram is shown in Figure 8F. The CE analysis revealed six well separated peaks corresponding to the non-, mono-, di-, tri-, tetra- and pentaacetylated forms of the protein. However, when analysing each peak spectrum with Xtract, we found that the extreme diversity of H3 modified forms precludes assignment of most of the molecular masses detected (supplemental 23
Figure S-6). However, some lower methylated forms, e.g. dimethylated H3.2 ac0-ac5 and trimethylated H3.3 ac4-ac5 could be designated.
Discussion
In this study, the suitability of CE-ESI-MS for the identification of post-translational modifications of histones was evaluated for the first time. Moreover, to date no proteomic analysis of purified H1 and core histones from rat testis has been performed. A porous sheathless CESI-MS interface in combination with a Thermo Scientific LTQ Orbitrap XL was used. For the analysis of H1 histones, the CESI-MS method developed was compared with nano-LC-ESI-MS. The results clearly demonstrate that more modified peptides and more modification sites were found by CESI-MS. However, both methods complement each other. Modified peptides from biological samples are often present in minute amounts only. Therefore, sensitivity of the instrument configuration is an important issue for the analysis of these compounds. Generally, sensitivity increases with decreasing flow rates. For example, a 20 fold increase in sensitivity by decreasing the flowrate from 330 nL/min to 10 nL/min has been shown by Busnel et al. (40). Another advantage of minimal flow rates below 20 nL/min is the operation in the mass sensitive range of the ESI process resulting in significantly reduced analyte suppression and improved sensitivity (55, 56). However, in LC void volumes and instrument specifications usually limit the broad application possibilities of flow rates below 100nL/min. In addition, co-elution with the unmodified form associated with ion suppression effects may also affect sensitive detection of the modified species in an adverse manner. The CE-MS configuration used for this investigation does not suffer from these limitations. There is no dead volume and flow rate generated by the EOF can easily be manipulated in a wide range from almost zero to over 100 nL/min by 24
appropriate capillary surface modification. As many covalent modifications such as phosphorylation, acetylation alter the charge of peptides and thus their mobility, co-migration with their unmodified form and hence possible ion-suppression effects usually do not occur. Interestingly, linker histone methylation and ubiquitination was not observed. In a previous study on post-translational modifications of H1 histones across different mouse tissues, a range of modifications including methylation, ubiquitination and formylation was found (51, 57). These modifications were mainly detected in mouse spleen and other tissues such as brain or kidney but none were detected in mouse testis. As the testis is an organ composed of many different cell types, including various types of somatic cells (e.g., Sertoli cells, Leydig cells, and peritubular cells) as well as germ cells, performing a variety of distinct functions, this could be a reason for the lack or under-representation of certain modifications. Even with pre-fractionation of the linker histone subtypes via RP-HPLC before enzymatic digestion, very few modifications were identified in mouse testis by LC-MS. These few included three phosphorylation sites on H1.1 (Ser-1, Thr-3 and Ser-43), one on H1.3 (Thr-18), one on H1.4 (Thr-18) and on H1.5 (Ser-18) and one acetylation site on H1.1 (Lys-87) (51). In contrast to these results we were able to identify 33 modification sites in rat testis by CESI-MS without pre-separation of individual H1 subtypes by RP-HPLC. In addition, for low concentration phosphopeptide analysis of rat H1 histones IMAC enrichment was applied, which increases the number of modification sites up to 35. As a result, this investigation showed that CESI-MS significantly increases the detection of phosphopeptides in the low molecular mass range. Even in the high sample load analysis LC-ESI-MS is not able to detect this group of peptides. Some of the larger phosphopeptides, however, are preferentially detected in LC-MS. Our group recently described this effect for unmodified H1 peptides. We found that low molecular mass peptides (below 1400 Da) were preferentially identified by CESI-MS, since this 25
group of peptides poorly interacts with the reversed phase material in the nano-LC system and, therefore, are washed out (39). In order to further evaluate the different outcome of both techniques, we compared relative peptide abundances across the best CE and LC analysis (shown in supplemental Figure S-7). A heat map of the relative peptide abundances was generated and illustrates that there is not only a substantial difference between CE- and LC methods but also a difference between the two CE methods, albeit to a lesser extent. The divergent peptide identifications among both CESImethods are mainly due to the different separation conditions of positive and neutral capillaries. In a positively coated capillary the positively charged peptide ions migrate towards the cathode CE inlet. As the magnitude of the EOF generated is much greater than the oppositely directed electrophoretic mobility of the peptides, they are carried by the EOF towards the inlet of the MS instrument. Under these conditions peptides with low m/z values (implying high electrophoretic mobility and, therefore, long migration times) are well separated from each other and from other peptides, which improves their identification and quantification (supplemental Figure S-7, peptide groups 1 and 5). In contrast, a neutral capillary results in an almost complete suppression of the EOF and, when working in normal CE mode (+30kV) a low flow rate (10nL/min) towards the MS can be obtained. In this case, peptides with low m/z values are the fastest migrating peptides and, therefore, less well separated, which favors the identification and quantification of peptides with high m/z values (supplemental Figure S-7, peptide group 2 and 6). This includes also phosphopeptides (peptide group 2) and Nα-terminal acetylated peptides (peptide group 6) due to their reduced charge state. When comparing CESI-MS with LC-ESI-MS, there is a clear bias of CE towards low molecular mass peptides and phophopeptides. Because of their poor interaction with the column support many of these peptides are not even detected in LC-MS although 100 times more sample was 26
injected. This can be clearly seen in supplemental Figure S-7 due to the color coding of relative peptide signal intensities. The most significant difference in signal intensities was found for peptide group 4 by LC-MS compared to CESI-MS reflecting the 100 fold increase in sample amount injected in LC. This group comprises low abundant longer peptides and peptides, which do not profit from the gain in sensitivity usually seen in CESI-MS. Similar complementary peptide identification was found in recent CE and nano-LC studies by our group and other researchers (32, 39, 58). There is a clear bias of CE towards basic, hydrophilic peptides of low molecular mass. Additionally, the Yates Lab attributed gains in sensitivity to lower noise levels with CE, illustrated by better signal-to-noise ratios of peptide precursor ions and associated higher XCorr values of identified peptides when compared to LC (58). These trends may be also explained by the difference in electrospray conditions between both methods. The increasing organic composition of the solvent throughout the LC separation is known to affect ESI response of different peptide hydrophobicities, while CE-MS conditions are essentially constant. However, the results also show that the complementary nature of both techniques is of great value for a comprehensive analysis of peptide modifications. According to sample complexity the CESI analysis can be adjusted easily using different types of coated capillaries. Using positively coated capillaries very fast separations suitable for low complex samples can be achieved, as shown for phosphopeptides enriched by IMAC, for intact core histones and for mapping core histone modifications. Neutrally coated capillaries result in increased separation windows suitable for medium complex samples. In general, CESI-MS analyses are faster than LC-MS as no column equilibration time is necessary. Depending on the surface modification of the capillary, a total cycle time between 16 min (PEI) and 70 min (neutral) was found. In contrast, the nano-LC method used for the linker histone analysis required a total cycle time of 82 min, including 25 min for washing and reequilibration. It is also 27
important to note in this context that the carryover between analysis can be a major problem in LC-MS requiring additional time consuming wash steps and analyses, which may increase total analysis time substantially. In CESI-MS, after applying a one minute wash step with methanol and background electrolyte carryover is actually not observable. The second part of the present study evaluates the potential of CESI-MS for the characterization of core histone subtypes and their modifications. Rat testis core histone fractions pre-separated by RP-HPLC were analysed by bottom-up CESI-MS using a positively coated capillary, which enables fast separations, allowing the annotation of acetylated, methylated, and phosphorylated histone peptides. A large number of modification sites known from human and mouse core histones were experimentally proved on rat core histones for the first time. Many of the recently reported most frequent PTMs found in mouse brain core histones were also found with this approach (59). Moreover, several sites on testis-specific subtypes like H2B1A and H3.1t could be detected as well as specific sites not found in mouse brain. CESI-MS resulted in identification of 77 modified peptides corresponding to 42 sites, supporting the efficiency, sensitivity, and specificity of the CESI technique. In order to get knowledge of the presence of multiple modifications that can co-occur on different histone residues, one must analyze larger peptides or intact proteins that encompass more modified sites. Only recently have new technological advances based on ETD and ECD fragmentation begun to permit these studies. Top-down proteomics has been successfully applied to the characterization and quantitation of histone forms and PTMs by Kelleher and coworkers. Histone H2A, H2B and H3 variants were identified by use of high mass-accuracy FT-ICR-MS along with their changes in relative expression and modifications during the cell cycle (54, 60, 61). In order to increase throughput and sensitivity of comprehensive histone modification characterization two-dimensional liquid chromatography is advantageous prior to mass spectrometric investigation. It turned out that a HILIC method 28
developed by our group for the separation of histone variants and their modified forms (62, 63) is very well suited for combination with top-down MS (64-66). HILIC is a powerful tool to separate post-translational modifications of proteins. Combining HILIC and RP-HPLC enabled us to isolate various H2A variants and their acetylated forms (63) as well as methylated and acetylated H4 forms with high purity, whose identities were determined by using offline MS detection (46, 47). The method was successfully applied for the characterization of combinatorial histone codes by the Kelleher and Garcia groups (64-66). They also showed that more detailed PTM occupancy information can be obtained from longer peptides derived by Asp-N or Glu-C digestion using middle-down MS (66). This strategy was found to be especially important for the analysis of highly modified histone H3, which has proven to be a significantly more difficult analytical problem than H2A, H2B or H4. This problem also occurs with our CESI-MS analysis of intact H3 shown in supplemental Figure S-6. The peaks obtained were found to differ in the number of acetyl groups, but the complex pattern of modified forms present within each peak did not allow the assignment of all individual H3 forms. Recently, Young et el. presented an MS-friendly version of this HILIC chromatography utilizing “saltless” pH gradient chromatography which is on-line coupled with MS and results in improved analysis time, sample consumption and dynamic range (67). Our study on intact histone analysis presents an alternative method to HILIC. In contrast to HILIC the CE method separates the histone proteins solely by acetylation state, the non-, mono-, di-, and trimethylated forms co-migrate with the different acetylated species. Nevertheless, CESIMS also allows confident assignment between isobaric modifications like acetylation and trimethylation without the requirement of high-resolution mass spectrometry, as they can be confidently distinguished because of their different migration time. The combined use of CE and MS has the potential to permit the characterization of complex mixtures such as hypermodified 29
histones and should couple nicely with ETD to make this method amenable to bench-top MS instruments. Although CESI-MS detection of histone modifications is limited by the mass loading capacity of the system, it has the advantage of providing a rapid overview of the modification status of intact proteins, allowing fast and reproducible comparisons between treated and untreated cells or different cell phases. Advances in several areas will be needed to further increase the range of potential CE applications in this field, including continued improvements in sensitivity, resolution of high molecular masses and scan rate of MS instruments. It is noteworthy in this context that combining CE with MS reveals another advantage: CE shows a remarkably higher separation efficiency for high molecular mass compounds like larger peptides and proteins compared to any LC method. Based on the results obtained, we envision the “CESI-method” being used in a broad range of applications, not only for epigenetic studies of histones, but also for modified peptide identification in general.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Beckman Coulter, Inc. for providing the sheathless high sensitive porous sprayer interface. We kindly thank Astrid Devich for excellent technical assistance and Jim Thorn for his help with the manuscript.
30
References
1.
Izzo, A., Kamieniarz, K., and Schneider, R. (2008) The histone H1 family: specific
members, specific functions? Biol Chem 389, 333-343. 2.
Happel, N., and Doenecke, D. (2009) Histone H1 and its isoforms: contribution to
chromatin structure and function. Gene 431, 1-12. 3.
Lindner, H., Helliger, W., and Puschendorf, B. (1990) Separation of rat tissue histone H1
subtypes by reverse-phase h.p.l.c. Identification and assignment to a standard H1 nomenclature. The Biochemical Journal 269, 359-363. 4.
Wood, C., Snijders, A., Williamson, J., Reynolds, C., Baldwin, J., and Dickman, M.
(2009) Post-translational modifications of the linker histone variants and their association with cell mechanisms. The FEBS Journal 276, 3685-3697. 5.
Turner, B. M. (2000) Histone acetylation and an epigenetic code. Bioessays 22, 836-845.
6.
Jenuwein, T., and Allis, C. D. (2001) Translating the histone code. Science (New York,
N.Y 293, 1074-1080. 7.
Su, X., Ren, C., and Freitas, M. A. (2007) Mass spectrometry-based strategies for
characterization of histones and their post-translational modifications. Expert Review of Proteomics 4, 211-225. 8.
Bonenfant, D., Coulot, M., Towbin, H., Schindler, P., and van Oostrum, J. (2006)
Characterization of histone H2A and H2B variants and their post-translational modifications by mass spectrometry. Mol Cell Proteomics 5, 541-552. 9.
Villar-Garea, A., and Imhof, A. (2006) The analysis of histone modifications. Biochimica
et Biophysica Acta 1764, 1932-1939.
31
10.
Garcia, B. A., Shabanowitz, J., and Hunt, D. F. (2007) Characterization of histones and
their post-translational modifications by mass spectrometry. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology 11, 66-73. 11.
Pesavento, J. J., Garcia, B. A., Streeky, J. A., Kelleher, N. L., and Mizzen, C. A. (2007)
Mild performic acid oxidation enhances chromatographic and top down mass spectrometric analyses of histones. Mol Cell Proteomics 6, 1510-1526. 12.
Su, X., Jacob, N. K., Amunugama, R., Lucas, D. M., Knapp, A. R., Ren, C., Davis, M. E.,
Marcucci, G., Parthun, M. R., Byrd, J. C., Fishel, R., and Freitas, M. A. (2007) Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry profiling of histones. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 850, 440-454. 13.
Sarg, B., Helliger, W., Talasz, H., Forg, B., and Lindner, H. H. (2006) Histone H1
phosphorylation occurs site-specifically during interphase and mitosis: identification of a novel phosphorylation site on histone H1. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 281, 6573-6580. 14.
Sarg, B., Chwatal, S., Talasz, H., and Lindner, H. H. (2009) Testis-specific linker histone
H1t is multiply phosphorylated during spermatogenesis. Identification of phosphorylation sites. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 284, 3610-3618. 15.
Garcia, B. A., Mollah, S., Ueberheide, B. M., Busby, S. A., Muratore, T. L., Shabanowitz,
J., and Hunt, D. F. (2007) Chemical derivatization of histones for facilitated analysis by mass spectrometry. Nature Protocols 2, 933-938. 16.
Garcia, B. A., Joshi, S., Thomas, C. E., Chitta, R. K., Diaz, R. L., Busby, S. A., Andrews,
P. C., Ogorzalek Loo, R. R., Shabanowitz, J., Kelleher, N. L., Mizzen, C. A., Allis, C. D., and Hunt, D. F. (2006) Comprehensive phosphoprotein analysis of linker histone H1 from Tetrahymena thermophila. Mol Cell Proteomics 5, 1593-1609.
32
17.
Lindner, H. H. (2008) Analysis of histones, histone variants, and their post-translationally
modified forms. Electrophoresis 29, 2516-2532. 18.
Lindner, H., Helliger, W., Dirschlmayer, A., Jaquemar, M., and Puschendorf, B. (1992)
High-performance capillary electrophoresis of core histones and their acetylated modified derivatives. The Biochemical Journal 283 ( Pt 2), 467-471. 19.
Lindner, H., Helliger, W., Dirschlmayer, A., Talasz, H., Wurm, M., Sarg, B., Jaquemar,
M., and Puschendorf, B. (1992) Separation of phosphorylated histone H1 variants by highperformance capillary electrophoresis. J Chromatogr 608, 211-216. 20.
Lindner, H., Helliger, W., Sarg, B., and Meraner, C. (1995) Effect of buffer composition
on the migration order and separation of histone H1 subtypes. Electrophoresis 16, 604-610. 21.
Lindner, H., Wurm, M., Dirschlmayer, A., Sarg, B., and Helliger, W. (1993) Application
of high-performance capillary electrophoresis to the analysis of H1 histones. Electrophoresis 14, 480-485. 22.
Sarg, B., Helliger, W., Hoertnagl, B., Puschendorf, B., and Lindner, H. (1999) The N-
terminally acetylated form of mammalian histone H1(o), but not that of avian histone H5, increases with age. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 372, 333-339. 23.
Good, D. M., Zurbig, P., Argiles, A., Bauer, H. W., Behrens, G., Coon, J. J., Dakna, M.,
Decramer, S., Delles, C., Dominiczak, A. F., Ehrich, J. H., Eitner, F., Fliser, D., Frommberger, M., Ganser, A., Girolami, M. A., Golovko, I., Gwinner, W., Haubitz, M., Herget-Rosenthal, S., Jankowski, J., Jahn, H., Jerums, G., Julian, B. A., Kellmann, M., Kliem, V., Kolch, W., Krolewski, A. S., Luppi, M., Massy, Z., Melter, M., Neususs, C., Novak, J., Peter, K., Rossing, K., Rupprecht, H., Schanstra, J. P., Schiffer, E., Stolzenburg, J. U., Tarnow, L., Theodorescu, D., Thongboonkerd, V., Vanholder, R., Weissinger, E. M., Mischak, H., and Schmitt-Kopplin, P.
33
(2010) Naturally occurring human urinary peptides for use in diagnosis of chronic kidney disease. Mol Cell Proteomics 9, 2424-2437. 24.
Zimmerli, L. U., Schiffer, E., Zurbig, P., Good, D. M., Kellmann, M., Mouls, L., Pitt, A.
R., Coon, J. J., Schmieder, R. E., Peter, K. H., Mischak, H., Kolch, W., Delles, C., and Dominiczak, A. F. (2008) Urinary proteomic biomarkers in coronary artery disease. Mol Cell Proteomics 7, 290-298. 25.
Hirayama, A., Kami, K., Sugimoto, M., Sugawara, M., Toki, N., Onozuka, H., Kinoshita,
T., Saito, N., Ochiai, A., Tomita, M., Esumi, H., and Soga, T. (2009) Quantitative metabolome profiling of colon and stomach cancer microenvironment by capillary electrophoresis time-offlight mass spectrometry. Cancer Research 69, 4918-4925. 26.
Sugimoto, M., Wong, D. T., Hirayama, A., Soga, T., and Tomita, M. (2010) Capillary
electrophoresis mass spectrometry-based saliva metabolomics identified oral, breast and pancreatic cancer-specific profiles. Metabolomics 6, 78-95. 27.
Maxwell, E. J., and Chen, D. D. (2008) Twenty years of interface development for
capillary electrophoresis-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta 627, Page. 28.
Pantuckova, P., Gebauer, P., Bocek, P., and Krivankova, L. (2011) Recent advances in
CE-MS: Synergy of wet chemistry and instrumentation innovations. Electrophoresis 32, Page. 29.
von Brocke, A., Nicholson, G., and Bayer, E. (2001) Recent advances in capillary
electrophoresis/electrospray-mass spectrometry. Electrophoresis 22, 1251-1266. 30.
Maxwell, E. J., Zhong, X., Zhang, H., van Zeijl, N., and Chen, D. D. (2010) Decoupling
CE and ESI for a more robust interface with MS. Electrophoresis 31, 25-33. 31.
Wojcik, R., Dada, O. O., Sadilek, M., and Dovichi, N. J. (2010) Simplified capillary
electrophoresis nanospray sheath-flow interface for high efficiency and sensitive peptide analysis. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 24, 2554-2560. 34
32.
Li, Y., Champion, M. M., Sun, L., Champion, P. A., Wojcik, R., and Dovichi, N. J. (2012)
Capillary zone electrophoresis-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry as an alternative proteomics platform to ultraperformance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry for samples of intermediate complexity. Analytical Chemistry 84, 1617-1622. 33.
Zamfir, A. D. (2007) Recent advances in sheathless interfacing of capillary
electrophoresis and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography 1159, 2-13. 34.
Issaq, H. J., Janini, G. M., Chan, K. C., and Veenstra, T. D. (2004) Sheathless
electrospray ionization interfaces for capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometric detection advantages and limitations. Journal of Chromatography 1053, 37-42. 35.
Zamfir, A. D., Dinca, N., Sisu, E., and Peter-Katalinic, J. (2006) Copper-coated
microsprayer interface for on-line sheathless capillary electrophoresis electrospray mass spectrometry of carbohydrates. Journal of Separation Science 29, 414-422. 36.
Kele, Z., Ferenc, G., Klement, E., Toth, G. K., and Janaky, T. (2005) Design and
performance of a sheathless capillary electrophoresis/mass spectrometry interface by combining fused-silica capillaries with gold-coated nanoelectrospray tips. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 19, 881-885. 37.
Dahlin, A. P., Wetterhall, M., Liljegren, G., Bergstrom, S. K., Andren, P., Nyholm, L.,
Markides, K. E., and Bergquist, J. (2005) Capillary electrophoresis coupled to mass spectrometry from a polymer modified poly(dimethylsiloxane) microchip with an integrated graphite electrospray tip. The Analyst 130, 193-199. 38.
Moini, M. (2007) Simplifying CE-MS operation. 2. Interfacing low-flow separation
techniques to mass spectrometry using a porous tip. Analytical Chemistry 79, 4241-4246. 35
39.
Faserl, K., Sarg, B., Kremser, L., and Lindner, H. (2011) Optimization and evaluation of a
sheathless capillary electrophoresis-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry platform for peptide
analysis:
comparison
to
liquid
chromatography-electrospray
ionization
mass
spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry 83, 7297-7305. 40.
Busnel, J. M., Schoenmaker, B., Ramautar, R., Carrasco-Pancorbo, A., Ratnayake, C.,
Feitelson, J. S., Chapman, J. D., Deelder, A. M., and Mayboroda, O. A. (2010) High Capacity Capillary Electrophoresis-Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry: Coupling a Porous Sheathless Interface with Transient-Isotachophoresis. Analytical Chemistry 82, 9476-9483. 41.
Ramautar, R., Heemskerk, A. A., Hensbergen, P. J., Deelder, A. M., Busnel, J. M., and
Mayboroda, O. A. (2012) CE-MS for proteomics: Advances in interface development and application. Journal of Proteomics 75, 3814-3828. 42.
Haselberg, R., Ratnayake, C. K., de Jong, G. J., and Somsen, G. W. (2010) Performance
of a sheathless porous tip sprayer for capillary electrophoresis-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry of intact proteins. Journal of Chromatography 1217, 7605-7611. 43.
Nguyen, A., and Moini, M. (2008) Analysis of major protein-protein and protein-metal
complexes of erythrocytes directly from cell lysate utilizing capillary electrophoresis mass spectrometry. Analytical Chemistry 80, 7169-7173. 44.
Garza, S., and Moini, M. (2006) Analysis of complex protein mixtures with improved
sequence coverage using (CE-MS/MS)n. Analytical Chemistry 78, 7309-7316. 45.
Sebastiano, R., Gelfi, C., Righetti, P. G., and Citterio, A. (2001) Omega-
iodoalkylammonium salts as permanent capillary silica wall modifiers. Comparative analysis of their structural parameters and substituent effects. Journal of Chromatography 924, 71-81.
36
46.
Sarg, B., Koutzamani, E., Helliger, W., Rundquist, I., and Lindner, H. H. (2002)
Postsynthetic trimethylation of histone H4 at lysine 20 in mammalian tissues is associated with aging. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 277, 39195-39201. 47.
Sarg, B., Helliger, W., Talasz, H., Koutzamani, E., and Lindner, H. H. (2004) Histone H4
hyperacetylation precludes histone H4 lysine 20 trimethylation. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 279, 53458-53464. 48.
Elhamili, A., Wetterhall, M., Arvidsson, B., Sebastiano, R., Righetti, P. G., and Bergquist,
J. (2008) Rapid capillary electrophoresis time-of-flight mass spectrometry separations of peptides and proteins using a monoquaternarized piperazine compound (M7C4I) for capillary coatings. Electrophoresis 29, 1619-1625. 49.
Lindner, H., Sarg, B., Hoertnagl, B., and Helliger, W. (1998) The microheterogeneity of
the mammalian H1(0) histone. Evidence for an age-dependent deamidation. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 273, 13324-13330. 50.
Lindner, H., Sarg, B., Grunicke, H., and Helliger, W. (1999) Age-dependent deamidation
of H1(0) histones in chromatin of mammalian tissues. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 125, 182-186. 51.
Wisniewski, J. R., Zougman, A., Kruger, S., and Mann, M. (2007) Mass spectrometric
mapping of linker histone H1 variants reveals multiple acetylations, methylations, and phosphorylation as well as differences between cell culture and tissue. Mol Cell Proteomics 6, 72-87. 52.
Lindner, H., Wesierska-Gadek, J., Helliger, W., Puschendorf, B., and Sauermann, G.
(1989) Identification of ADP-ribosylated histones by the combined use of high-performance liquid chromatography and electrophoresis. J Chromatogr 472, 243-249.
37
53.
Talasz, H., Lindner, H. H., Sarg, B., and Helliger, W. (2005) Histone H4-lysine 20
monomethylation is increased in promoter and coding regions of active genes and correlates with hyperacetylation. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 280, 38814-38822. 54.
Siuti, N., Roth, M. J., Mizzen, C. A., Kelleher, N. L., and Pesavento, J. J. (2006) Gene-
specific characterization of human histone H2B by electron capture dissociation. Journal of Proteome Research 5, 233-239. 55.
Kelly, R. T., Page, J. S., Zhao, R., Qian, W. J., Mottaz, H. M., Tang, K., and Smith, R. D.
(2008) Capillary-based multi nanoelectrospray emitters: improvements in ion transmission efficiency and implementation with capillary reversed-phase LC-ESI-MS. Analytical Chemistry 80, 143-149. 56.
Schmidt, A., Karas, M., and Dulcks, T. (2003) Effect of different solution flow rates on
analyte ion signals in nano-ESI MS, or: when does ESI turn into nano-ESI? Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry 14, 492-500. 57.
Tweedie-Cullen, R. Y., Reck, J. M., and Mansuy, I. M. (2009) Comprehensive mapping
of post-translational modifications on synaptic, nuclear, and histone proteins in the adult mouse brain. Journal of Proteome Research 8, 4966-4982. 58.
Wang, Y., Fonslow, B. R., Wong, C. C., Nakorchevsky, A., and Yates, J. R., 3rd (2012)
Improving the comprehensiveness and sensitivity of sheathless capillary electrophoresis-tandem mass spectrometry for proteomic analysis. Analytical Chemistry 84, 8505-8513. 59.
Tweedie-Cullen, R. Y., Brunner, A. M., Grossmann, J., Mohanna, S., Sichau, D., Nanni,
P., Panse, C., and Mansuy, I. M. (2012) Identification of combinatorial patterns of posttranslational modifications on individual histones in the mouse brain. PloS one 7, e36980.
38
60.
Thomas, C. E., Kelleher, N. L., and Mizzen, C. A. (2006) Mass spectrometric
characterization of human histone H3: a bird's eye view. Journal of Proteome Research 5, 240247. 61.
Boyne, M. T., 2nd, Pesavento, J. J., Mizzen, C. A., and Kelleher, N. L. (2006) Precise
characterization of human histones in the H2A gene family by top down mass spectrometry. Journal of Proteome Research 5, 248-253. 62.
Lindner, H., Sarg, B., and Helliger, W. (1997) Application of hydrophilic-interaction
liquid chromatography to the separation of phosphorylated H1 histones. Journal of Chromatography 782, 55-62. 63.
Lindner, H., Sarg, B., Meraner, C., and Helliger, W. (1996) Separation of acetylated core
histones by hydrophilic-interaction liquid chromatography. Journal of Chromatography 743, 137-144. 64.
Pesavento, J. J., Mizzen, C. A., and Kelleher, N. L. (2006) Quantitative analysis of
modified proteins and their positional isomers by tandem mass spectrometry: human histone H4. Analytical Chemistry 78, 4271-4280. 65.
Pesavento, J. J., Bullock, C. R., LeDuc, R. D., Mizzen, C. A., and Kelleher, N. L. (2008)
Combinatorial modification of human histone H4 quantitated by two-dimensional liquid chromatography coupled with top down mass spectrometry. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 283, 14927-14937. 66.
Garcia, B. A., Pesavento, J. J., Mizzen, C. A., and Kelleher, N. L. (2007) Pervasive
combinatorial modification of histone H3 in human cells. Nature Methods 4, 487-489. 67.
Young, N. L., DiMaggio, P. A., Plazas-Mayorca, M. D., Baliban, R. C., Floudas, C. A.,
and Garcia, B. A. (2009) High throughput characterization of combinatorial histone codes. Mol Cell Proteomics 8, 2266-2284. 39
Figure Legends
Table 1: List of modified H1 histone peptides identified from rat testis. The peptide confidence level (percolator q value) and the probability for the respective site being truly phosphorylated (pRS probability) are given. Novel modification sites are highlighted in grey; a, acetylated; p, phosphorylated; d, deamidated. Figure 1. CZE separation of H1 histones from rat testis carried out in 0.5 M sodium phosphate buffer at pH 2.0 containing 0.02% HPMC and shown in the insert, the separation of histone H1.0 carried out in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer at pH 3.5, containing 0.02% HPMC. Running conditions were as follows: injection time, 2 s; UV detection at 200 nm; voltage, 12 kV; untreated capillary (50 cm in length; 75 µm ID). (ac0, ac1: non-acetylated and monoacetylated forms; p0, p1, p2: non-, mono-, di- and triphosphorylated forms). Figure 2. Base peak electropherograms of rat testis H1 histones digested with endoproteinase Arg-C using positively charged capillaries. (A) PEI coated capillary, separation voltage: -25 kV, (B) M7C4I coated capillary, separation voltage: -25 kV, (C) M7C4I coated capillary, separation voltage: -12.5 kV. BGE: 0.1% (v/v) formic acid. Sample amount: 6.15 ng (300 fmol). Capillary length: 100 cm with porous tip, i.d.: 30 µm, o.d.: 150 µm. Figure 3. Base peak chromatograms of rat testis H1 histones digested with endoproteinase Arg-C using LC-ESI-MS. (A) sample amount: 6.15 ng (300 fmol), (B) sample amount: 61.5 ng (3 pmol) and (C) sample amount: 615 ng (30.0 pmol). LC-ESI-MS was performed using a homemade fritless column; packed 10 cm with 3 µm reversed-phase C18 (Reprosil). The gradient (solvent A: 0.1% formic acid; solvent B: 0.1% formic acid in 85% acetonitrile) started at 4%B. The
40
concentration of solvent B was increased linearly from 4% to 50% during 50 min and from 50% to 100% during 5 min. A flowrate of 250 nL/min was applied. Figure 4. Base peak electropherograms of rat testis H1 histones digested with endoproteinase Arg-C using (A) an M7C4I coated capillary, separation voltage: -12.5 kV, BGE: 0.3% (v/v) formic acid (B) an M7C4I coated capillary, separation voltage: -12.5 kV, BGE: 0.6% (v/v) formic acid and (C) a neutrally coated capillary, separation voltage: +30 kV, BGE: 10% (v/v) acetic acid. Sample amount: 6.15 ng (300 fmol). Capillary length: 100 cm with porous tip, i.d.: 30 µm, o.d.: 150 µm. Figure 5. Number of unmodified and modified histone H1 peptides identified by CE- and LCESI-MS/MS analysis. (A) Number of identified histone H1 peptides (modified and non-modified) were merged from triplicate analyses. (B) Within each column the total number of modified peptides as well as the distribution of specific types of modifications is shown. The numbers presented in the diagram are the sum of unique modified peptides found in triplicate runs. Overlap of peptides identified with CESI-MS ranges from 75.0% - 84.1%, with LC-ESI-MS from 65.8% - 71.4%. Figure 6. Venn diagram showing the overlap of (A) total histone H1 peptides, (B) modified H1 peptides and (C) modification sites identified by CESI-MS and LC-ESI-MS from triplicate runs. Figure 7. Mass distribution of histone H1 phosphopeptides obtained with IMAC enrichment using CESI-MS and LC-ESI-MS. Data originate from Table 1. Each analysis was performed three times. Figure 8. CESI-MS analysis of intact hyperacetylated core histones using an M7C4I coated capillary. Conditions as described in Figure 2B. (A) Base peak electropherogram of intact H4.
41
(B) Mass deconvoluted spectra of individual H4 peaks (1-5). Average mass of histone H4 calculated for ac0me2: 11330.27 Da (UniProt accession P62806). (C) Base peak electropherogram of intact H2A.2. (D) Base peak electropherogram of intact H2A.1. (E) Base peak electropherogram of intact H2B. (F) Base peak electropherogram of intact H3.2+H3.3. ac0,ac1,ac2,ac3,ac4: non-, mono-, di-, tri- and tetraacetylated forms; me0,me1,me2,me3: non-, mono-, di- and trimethylated forms. Figure 9. Acetylation (A) and methylation (B) levels of hyperacetylated histone H4 in mouse erythroleukemia cells. Acetylation levels were determined by integrating the peak areas of MS1 precursors shown in Figure 8A and were calculated as percent area relative to the entire area of H4. Methylation status of each acetylated proteoform was determined individually by computing the monoisotopic mass intensities for the non-, mono-, di-, and trimethylated H4 present in each peak. Analyses are based on triplicate runs.
42
Table 1, page 1
43
Table 1, page 2
44
Figure 1
Figure 2
45
Figure 3
46
Figure 4
47
Figure 5
A
B
Figure 6
A
B
C
48
Figure 7
Figure 8
49
Figure 9
50
