AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,. R/AT NO. 25/1, MARIAMMAN. TEMPLE STREET,
DEVAR JEEVANA HALLI,. PERIYAR NAGAR,. BANGALORE – 560 005. 2. SMT.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE ON THE 13TH DAY OF JULY 2012 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH WRIT PETITION NO.14810 OF 2011(GM-CPC) BETWEEN : SMT. ANANDHI, W/O SRI. P.S. RAJAN, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT NO. 16, MARIAMMAN TEMPLE STREET, JEEVANA HALLI, PERIYAR NAGAR, BANGALORE – 560 005. (BY SRI A SHIVAPRAKASAN, ADVOCATE) AND : 1
SRI. K JAYARAM, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT NO. 25/1, MARIAMMAN TEMPLE STREET, DEVAR JEEVANA HALLI, PERIYAR NAGAR, BANGALORE – 560 005.
2
SMT. RAMANI, W/O SRI. KOTHANDAN, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT NO. 25/2, MARIAMMAN TEMPLE STREET,
...PETITIONER
2 DEVAR JEEVANA HALLI, PERIYAR NAGAR, BANGALORE – 560 005. 3
SRI. MURTHY, S/O SRI. RAMU, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT NO. 25/3, MARIAMMAN TEMPLE STREET, DEVAR JEEVANA HALLI, PERIYAR NAGAR, BANGALORE – 560 005.
4
SRI. SARAVANAN, S/O SRI. PHOOBALAN, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT NO. 25/4, MARIAMMAN TEMPLE STREET, DEVAR JEEVANA HALLI, PERIYAR NAGAR, BANGALORE – 560 005.
5
SRI. PANNERSELVAM, S/O SRI. THANGAVELU, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT NO. 25/5, MARIAMMAN TEMPLE STREET, DEVAR JEEVANA HALLI, PERIYAR NAGAR, BANGLAORE – 560 005.
6
THE COMMISSIONER, BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGAR PALIKE, BANGALORE – 560 002.
7
SRI. MUDDURAJ, BBMP, ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, JAYAMAHAL SUB-DIVISION, SULTANJI GUNTA ROAD, BANGALORE – 560 001.
...RESPONDENTS
BY SRI H VENKATESH DODDERI, ADVOCATE FOR R6 R1 TO R5 ANDR7-SERVED)
3
THIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO PROHIBIT THE RESPONDENTS ONE TO FIVE FROM CLAIMING PUBLIC ROAD OVER THE SUIT SCHEDULE PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY, IN AN INJUNCTION SUIT, EXCEPT BY APPROACHING THE BBMP BY A REPRESENTATIVE SUIT AND QUASH THE ORDER DATED 8.2.2011 PASSED ON IA.NO.XI UNDER ORDER XIII RULE 3 OF CPC IN O.SNO.17342/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE HON'BLE IV ADDL.CITY CIVIL JUDGE, MAYO HALL UNIT, BANGALORE. THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:ORDER
None appears for the petitioner nor any representation is made even though the matter was called on two occasions. The Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE RSK/-
