A Comparison of Secure and Insecure Attached Child

0 downloads 0 Views 65KB Size Report
the same way, the studies of Ford and Linney (1995) and Worling (1995) did not find significant differences .... them as humble and reliable. They are often ...
Personality Disorders and Romantic Adult Attachment: A Comparison of Secure and Insecure Attached Child Molesters Stefan Bogaerts Stijn Vanheule Mattias Desmet Abstract: This study analyzed personality disorders in a group of 33 securely and 51 insecurely attached child molesters. A total of 51 child molesters were selected from a community-based educational training program, and the other group was selected from a Belgian prison (n = 33). Research shows that adult attachment styles and personality disorders share a common underlying structure. It is remarkable that very little is known about differences between securely and insecurely attached child molesters. In this study, the authors found that the schizoid personality disorder differed between securely and insecurely attached child molesters. These findings have implications for the aetiology and treatment of child molesters. Future research is necessary to determine patterns of attachment in relationship to personality disorders. Keywords: child molesters; attachment styles; personality disorders

A large body of research has shown that childhood and adult attachment differentiate in a significant way among child molesters, normal control participants, and nonsexual delinquents. Empirical evidence was found for the fact that child molesters experienced less secure attachment in childhood and adulthood compared with control groups. The attachment style of child molesters has been characterized as anxious-ambivalent and avoidant (e.g., Bogaerts, Vervaeke, & Goethals, 2004; Bumby & Hansen, 1997; Marshall, Hudson, & Hodkinson, 1993; Marshall, Serran, & Cortoni, 2000; Seidman, Marshall, Hudson, & Robertson, 1994; Smallbone & Dadds, 1998, 2000; Smallbone & McCabe, 2003; Ward, Hudson, Marshall, & Siegert, 1995; Ward, Louden, Hudson, & Marshall, 1995). It has been widely noted though that child molesters are a highly heterogeneous population (Canter, Hughes, & Kirby, 1998; Jamieson & Marshall, 2000; Marshall, Champagne, Brown, & Miller, 1997; Marshall, Laws, & Barbaree, 1990). This heterogeneity could account for some inconsistencies within the research findings concerned with child molesting. Indeed, contrary to expectation, research uncovered child molesters who could not be characterized by insecure adult International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, XX(X), 2005 1DOI: 10.1177/0306624X05278515 ã 2005 Sage Publications

1

2

International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology

attachment. A study by Smallbone and Dadds (1998) found child molesters reporting positive childhood attachment. The research by Smallbone and McCabe (2003) discovered that male sexual offenders more often report secure instead of insecure childhood maternal and paternal attachment. The findings in the field of adolescent male child molesters seem to parallel the ones of adult child molesters. This field appears also to be very heterogeneous and uncovers the same puzzle in the research findings. Here also, a consistent body of research demonstrated that adolescent child molesters fit in the profile of insecure attachment, intimacy deficits, loneliness, and impaired interpersonal functioning (Becker, 1998; Carpenter, Peed, & Eastman, 1995; Deisher, Wenet, Paperny, Clark, & Fehrenbach, 1982; Katz, 1990; Saunders, Awad, & White, 1986). But in the same way, the studies of Ford and Linney (1995) and Worling (1995) did not find significant differences among groups on these variables. An explanation for these inconsistencies could be the relative absence of ingroup research. Most of the time, forensic populations are compared to normal comparison groups and other forensic populations (child molesters compared to rapists, nonsexual offenders, violent sexual offenders, nonsexual violent offenders, etc.). A second explanation could just be that sexual offenders typically have multiple paraphilias (Cortoni & Marshall, 2001). Based on our clinical observations during forensic experiences or therapy with child molesters, we do not think these findings of securely attached child molesters invalidate those revealing attachment disorders and impaired interpersonal functioning. We are rather inclined to think that the aetiology or dynamics of a particular segment of child molesters just might not correspond to the profile of intimacy deficits, loneliness, insecure attachment, and impaired interpersonal functioning. In research, attachment theory was explored as a way of understanding the origins of personality disorders. Brennan and Shaver (1998) suggest that patterns of insecure attachment overlap with patterns of disordered personality. According to the most recent Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-IV) of the American Psychiatric Association (1994), virtually all personality disorders are characterized by persistent difficulties in interpersonal relations, which are often central features (Birtchnell & Shine, 2000; Brennan & Shaver, 1998). Defining personality disorders from an ontogenetic view as the final result of interpersonal processes, personality disorders were related to insecure childhood attachment (Jones, 1996; Lyons-Ruth, 1996; Wearden, Cook, & Vaughan-Jones, 2003) and specific parent-child interactions during the first years of life (Benjamin, 1993). Research has pointed out that “personality disorders are pervasive, inflexible and stable over time” (American Psychiatric Association, 1994, p. 629). The role of personality disorders in the aetiology and maintenance of sexually deviant behaviour has been explored extensively in research. However, despite the increasing attention paid to personality disorders since the DSM-III-R (American Psychiatric Association, 1987), very little is known about the aetiology of these disorders and the relationship between personality disorders and the aetiol-

Personality Disorders and Romantic Adult Attachment

3

ogy of child molestation. Only weak evidence exists concerning the relationship between specific personality disorders and sexual offenders (Marshall, 1996). In almost all cases, child molesters have been diagnosed as having one or more personality disorders (Buschman & Van Beek, 2003; Hart, 2003; Lussier, Proulx, & McKibben, 2001). There also is a lack of empirical research concerning differences between securely and insecurely attached child molesters. Brennan and Shaver (1998) emphasized the need to focus on elucidating the developmental antecedents of personality disorders to determine which personality disorders are connected with which types of attachment. Furthermore, most research compares child molesters to nonsexual delinquents or normal individuals; in-group research is rather scarce. The purpose of the present study is to investigate whether securely and insecurely attached child molesters differ in the types of personality disorders from which they suffer. Drawing on the results of the ontogenetic research line, we hereby predicted that personality disorders would contribute more to the explanation of insecure rather than secure attached child molesters. Before describing the results, we will present the participants and measured methods.

METHOD A sample of 84 male child molesters was selected between November 1999 and February 2001 from either an educational training program as an alternative sanction (n = 51) or a Belgian prison (n = 33). The prison sentences ranged from 4 to 18 months. In all, 41 were family-related child molesters, and 43 were nonfamily-related child molesters. Child molesters’ age ranged from 21 to 85 years (M = 38, SD = 11.1). Also, 38% were married, 40% were single, and 22% were divorced. Regarding education, 20% finished primary school, 30% finished the first level of secondary school, 32% succeeded in the second level of secondary school, and 16% attended college or university. According to reports of caretakers, 60% of the molesters had 1 victim, 20% had 2 victims, 12% had 3 victims, and 8% had 4 or more victims.

MEASURES The Adult Attachment Scale (Hazan & Shaver, 1987) was used to measure the adult romantic attachment style. This scale contains two parts: a multiple-choice section with three response categories (secure, avoiding, and anxious-ambivalent attachment styles) and a 7-point scale on which the level of secure, avoiding, and anxious-ambivalent attachment can be marked. At 11 weeks apart, the test-retest correlation was .80, indicating that it is a stable measure (Crowell, Fraley, & Shaver, 1999).

4

International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology

Personality disorders were measured by the Assessment of the DSM-IV Personality Disorders (ADP-IV; Schotte, De Doncker, Vankerckhoven, Vertommen, & Cosyns, 1998). The instrument consists of 94 items and is scored on a 7-point scale. The instrument measures the typicality and the distress or impairment of the DSM-IV criterion (American Psychiatric Association, 1994). The psychometric qualities of the instrument are encouraging. Alpha coefficients for the ADP-IV scales were all higher than .70, except for the obsessive compulsive (a = .68) and the schizoid (a = .60) personality disorders scales. First, nonhierarchical clustering algorithms were used to identify relatively homogeneous groups of securely and insecurely attached child molesters. Because our samples were not very large, we decided to select no more than two clusters (secure and insecure). The independent sample t test was then used as a control instrument to compare the means of secure, avoidant, and anxious-ambivalent attachment styles among both groups. Secondly, a t test was used again to compare whether personality disorders differed between securely and insecurely attached child molesters. Finally, a binary logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the linear relationship between the dependent variable (secure or insecure) and the personality disorders.

FINDINGS In all, 33 child molesters were clustered as secure, and 51 child molesters were clustered as insecure (see Table 1). The means of the three Hazan and Shaver’s (1987) attachment styles differentiated significantly between secure and insecure child molesters (secure attachment styles: t = 5.49, p < .01; avoidant attachment styles: t = 8.16, p < .001; anxious-ambivalent attachment styles: t = 11.64, p < .001). Bivariate analysis was used to examine which personality disorders differed between secure and insecure child molesters. As can be seen in Table 2, securely and insecurely attached child molesters differed significantly with respect to eight personality disorders. Securely attached child molesters reported less paranoid, schizoid, schizotypal, borderline, avoidant, dependant, depressive, and passiveaggressive personality disorders than did insecurely attached child molesters. Next, personality disorders that showed a significant difference on the bivariate level between securely and insecurely attached child molesters were inserted in the logistic regression model to examine which personality disorders contributed independently to the explanation of insecurely attached child molesters. The enter option was used. The model correctly predicted 79% of the 84 respondents in the secure and insecure cluster. A Cox and Snell R2 of .36 showed that the global model explained 36% of the variation in the dependent variable.1 The schizoid personality disorder offered a very strong significant contribution to the prediction of insecure child molesters (b = –.29, Wald = 8.27, df = 1, p < .005, Exp(b) = .74). No other personality disorder contributed to the explanation

Personality Disorders and Romantic Adult Attachment

5

TABLE 1 ATTACHMENT STYLES IN THE SECURE AND INSECURE CHILD MOLESTERS Secure Child Molestersa Attachment Styles Secure attachment style Avoidant attachment style Anxious-ambivalent attachment style

Insecure Child Molestersb

M

SD

M

SD

5.73 1.85 1.42

1.06 1.12 0.79

4.08 4.45 4.51

1.68 1.59 1.61

a. n = 33. b. n = 51.

TABLE 2 PERSONALITY DISORDERS FOR THE SECURE AND INSECURE CHILD MOLESTERS Securea

Insecureb

Independent Samples Test

Personality Disorders

M

SD

M

SD

t

Paranoid Schizoid Schizotypal Antisocial Borderline Histrionic Narcissistic Avoidant Dependant Obsessive-compulsive Depressive Passive-aggressive

16.15 15.30 20.00 14.33 22.87 18.54 18.72 15.60 17.42 21.63 16.09 14.36

5.39 4.40 6.24 5.90 7.37 6.34 5.22 5.68 4.10 7.23 4.85 4.63

19.43 21.52 24.50 16.43 27.43 20.54 19.37 22.50 20.86 24.17 19.41 17.21

6.75 5.57 7.97 6.10 9.69 5.87 5.85 8.12 7.20 8.48 7.09 6.50

2.34 5.41 2.74 1.55 2.29 1.47 0.51 4.25 2.49 1.41 2.35 2.18

p .02* .001*** .007** .12 .02* .14 .60 .001*** .01** .16 .02* .03*

a. n = 33. b. n = 51. *p < .05. **p < .01. ***p < .001.

of the dependant variable. The Exp(b) parameter shows that individuals with a schizoid personality disorder have 74% more chance to develop an insecure attachment style.

DISCUSSION This study focuses on the developmental origins of personality disorders with respect to attachment. Previous research indicated substantial overlap between

6

International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology

attachment and personality disorder measures and found that personality disorders shared the same similar developmental antecedents as attachment styles do (Brennan & Shaver, 1998). However, a serious problem in previous research is the lack of information about the linkage among the developmental antecedents of personality disorders to determine which personality disorders are shared by patterns of insecure attachment. In our research, a selection of child molesters was clustered into a group of securely attached child molesters and a group of insecurely attached child molesters. The schizoid personality disorder explained 36% of the variation in the dependant variable. No other personality disorders differentiated between the secure and the insecure group. In earlier research using structural equation models, the schizoid personality disorder was also found to be a very strong predictor of child molestation (Bogaerts et al., 2004). Other research confirms this finding (Cosyns, De Doncker, Hamelinck, Koeck, & De Ruyter, 1994; Seto & Barbaree, 1999; Shea, 1996). This result is in line with the fact that the schizoid character appears defensively devoid of any interest in human interaction (Sheldon & West, 1990). The schizoid individual tends to retreat from other persons, thereby isolating himself or herself from relationships with family, friends, and other persons. It is common knowledge that child molesters experienced less intimacy and less friendship during childhood and adulthood than did nonsexual delinquents and normal control groups (Bruinsma, 1996). The description of the schizoid individual can be related to the theory of Finkelhor (1984) and Finkelhor and Araji (1986). They described four components (sexual arousal, emotional congruence, blockage, and disinhibition) that contribute to the development of a child molester’s behavior. In the light of our results, the components emotional congruence and blockage are important. Schizoid individuals are frequently blocked from engaging in adult relationships by bad experiences with age-appropriate adults, sexual dysfunction, or limited and inadequate social and relational skills. Children, on the contrary, appear to them as humble and reliable. They are often emotionally congruent to children, and they feel comfortable in relating to children. Some consequences for the treatment of child molesters can be taken from our findings. Because the attachment style plays a significant role in the development of child molestation, psychotherapists should integrate interpersonal tools in the therapeutic method, especially in the therapeutic work with insecure child molesters. By experiencing an intersubjective relationship with a therapist, a patient can be enabled to develop a deeper understanding of his or her own attachment and abusive history. Sawle and Kear-Colwell (2001) introduced interpersonal focuses in their cognitive-analytic therapy. Through a positive relationship, the client comes to a deeper understanding of his or her own history of development. One limitation of this research is its use of a small clinical sample. It is not always possible to attain large samples of sexual delinquents. The second limitation of our research is its reliance on a self-report measure of personality disorders and adult attachment styles. Although the ADP-IV and the adult attachment scale

Personality Disorders and Romantic Adult Attachment

7

are both reliable, it would be better to use semistructured interviews to test the association between attachment styles and personality disorders. Concerning future research, longitudinal research is very important to get insight into the ontological primacy of attachment styles and personality disorders. There is a fair degree of overlap between attachment styles and personality disorders. Both sets are related to family experiences. Future research among child molesters should focus on elucidating the developmental antecedents of personality disorders to determine which ones are shared by patterns of insecure attachment and which ones are independent. The present study is a first step in connecting personality disorders and insecure adult attachment styles.

NOTE 1. We did not prefer the Nagelkerke R2. The schizoid personality disorder explained 49% of the 2 variation in the dependent variable. It is well known that the Nagelkerke R gives an overestimation of the explained variation.

REFERENCES American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Author. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author. Becker, J. V. (1998). What we know about the characteristics and treatment of adolescents who have committed sexual offences. Child Maltreatment, 3, 317-329. Benjamin, L. S. (1993). Interpersonal diagnosis and treatment of personality disorders. New York: Guilford. Birtchnell, J., & Shine, J. (2000). Personality disorders and the interpersonal octagon. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 73, 433-448. Bogaerts, S., Vervaeke, G., & Goethals, J. (2004). A comparison of relational attitude and personality disorders in the explanation of paedophilia. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16, 37-47. Brennan, K. A., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Attachment styles and personality disorders: Their connections to each other and to parental divorce, parental death, and perceptions of parental caregiving. Journal of Personality, 66, 835-878. Bruinsma, F. (1996). De jeugdige zedendelinquent. Diagnostiek, rapportage en hulpverlening [The juvenile sex offender. Diagnosis and treatment]. Utrecht, The Netherlands: SWP. Bumby, K. M., & Hansen, D. J. (1997). Intimacy deficits, fear of intimacy, and loneliness among sexual offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24, 315-331. Buschman, J., & Van Beek, D. (2003). A clinical model for the treatment of personality disordered sexual offenders: An example of theory knitting. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 15, 183-199. Canter, D., Hughes, D., & Kirby, S. (1998). Paedophilia: Pathology, criminality, or both? The development of a multivariate model of offence behaviour in child sexual abuse. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 9, 532-555.

8

International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology

Carpenter, D. R., Peed, S. F., & Eastman, B. (1995). Personality characteristics of adolescent sexual offenders: A pilot study. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 7, 195-203. Cortoni, F., & Marshall, W. L. (2001). Juvenile sexual history, sex and coping strategies: A comparison of sexual and violent offenders. International Journal of Psychology, 31, 1803-1803. Cosyns, P., De Doncker, D., Hamelinck, L., Koeck, S., & De Ruyter, B. (1994). Interpenitentiaire begeleiding van daders van seksueel geweld. UFC jaarverslag [Treatment of sex offenders in detention]. Antwerp, Belgium: Universitaire Instelling Antwerpen. Crowell, J. A., Fraley, R. C., & Shaver, P. R. (1999). Measurement of individual differences in adolescent and adult attachment. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment. Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 434-465). New York: Guilford. Deisher, R. W., Wenet, G. A., Paperny, D. M., Clark, T. F., & Fehrenbach, P. A. (1982). Adolescent sexual offence behaviour: The role of the physician. Journal of Adolescent Health Care, 2, 279-286. Finkelhor, D. (1984). Child sexual abuse: New theory and research. New York: Free Press. Finkelhor, D., & Araji, S. (1986). Explanations of paedophilia: A four factor model. The Journal of Sex Research, 22, 145-161. Ford, M. E., & Linney, J. A. (1995). Comparative analysis of juvenile sexual offenders, violent nonsexual offenders, and status offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10(1), 56-70. Hart, S. D. (2003). Actuarial risk assessment: Commentary on Berlin et al. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 15, 383-388. Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511-524. Jamieson, S., & Marshall, W. L. (2000). Attachment styles and violence in child molesters. The Journal of Sexual Aggression, 5(1), 88-98. Jones, R. L. (1996). Handbook of tests and measurements for Black populations. Hampton, VA: Cobb & Henry. Katz, R. C. (1990). Psychosocial adjustment in adolescent child molesters. Child Abuse and Neglect, 14, 567-575. Lussier, P., Proulx, J., & McKibben, A. (2001). Personality characteristics and adaptive strategies to cope with high risk situations and lapses in sexual aggressors. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 45, 159-171. Lyons-Ruth, K. (1996). Attachment relationships among children with aggressive behavior problems: The role of disorganized early attachment patterns. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 32-40. Marshall, W. L. (1996). Assessment, treatment and theorizing about sex offenders. Development during the past twenty years and future directions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 162-199. Marshall, W. L., Champagne, F., Brown, C., & Miller, S. (1997). Empathy, intimacy, loneliness, and self-esteem in non familial child molesters: A brief report. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 6, 87-98. Marshall, W. L., Hudson, S. M., & Hodkinson, S. (1993). The importance of attachment bonds in the development of juvenile sex offending. In H. E. Barbaree, W. L. Marshall, & S. M. Hudson (Eds.), The juvenile sex offender (pp. 164-181). New York: Guilford. Marshall, W. L., Laws, D. R., & Barbaree, H. E. (1990). Handbook of sexual assault. Issues, theories and treatment of the offender. New York: Plenum. Marshall, W. L., Serran, G. A., & Cortoni, F. A. (2000). Childhood attachment, sexual abuse, and their relationship to adult coping in child molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 12(1), 17-26. Saunders, E. B., Awad, G. A., & White, G. (1986). Male adolescent sexual offenders: The offender and the offence. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 31, 542-549. Sawle, G. A., & Kear-Colwell, J. (2001). Adult attachment style and pedophilia: A developmental perspective. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 45(1), 32-50. Schotte, C., De Doncker, D., Vankerckhoven, C., Vertommen, H., & Cosyns, P. (1998). Self-report assessment of the DSM-IV personality disorders. Measurement of trait and distress characteristics: The ADP-IV. Psychological Medicine, 28, 1179-1188.

Personality Disorders and Romantic Adult Attachment

9

Seidman, B., Marshall, W. L., Hudson, S. M., & Robertson, P. J. (1994). An examination of intimacy and loneliness in sex offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 9, 518-534. Seto, M. C., & Barbaree, H. E. (1999). Psychopathy, treatment behavior, and sex offender recidivism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14, 1235-1248. Shea, W. M. (1996). Personality characteristics of child molesters, non-sex offending criminal child abuse controls, and normals as differentiated by the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-II. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 56, 5184. Sheldon, A. E., & West, M. (1990). Attachment pathology and low social skills in avoidant personality disorder: An exploratory study. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 35, 596-599. Smallbone, S. W., & Dadds, M. R. (1998). Childhood attachment and adult attachment in incarcerated adult male sex offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 13, 555-573. Smallbone, S. W., & Dadds, M. R. (2000). Attachment and coercive sexual behavior. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 12, 3-15. Smallbone, S. W., & McCabe, B. A. (2003). Childhood attachment, childhood sexual abuse, and onset of masturbation among adult sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 15, 1-9. Ward, T., Hudson, S. M., Marshall, W. L., & Siegert, R. (1995). Attachment style and intimacy deficits in sexual offenders: A theoretical framework. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 7, 317-335. Ward, T., Louden, K., Hudson, S. M., & Marshall, W. L. (1995). A descriptive model of the offence chain for child molesters. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 10, 452-472. Wearden, A., Cook, L., & Vaughan-Jones, J. (2003). Adult attachment, alexithymia, symptom reporting, and health-related coping. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 55, 341-347. Worling, J. R. (1995). Sexual abuse histories of adolescent male sex offenders—Differences on the basis of the age and gender of their victims. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 610-613.

Stefan Bogaerts, Ph.D. Department Crime Prevention, Sanctions and Law Enforcement WODC, Ministry of Justice The Hague The Netherlands and University of Tilburg P.O. 20301 2500 EH The Hague The Netherlands Stijn Vanheule, Ph.D. Department of Psychoanalysis and Clinical Consulting Ghent University Belgium H. Dunantlaan, 2 9000 Ghent Belgium Mattias Desmet, M.A. Department of Psychoanalysis and Clinical Consulting Ghent University Belgium H. Dunantlaan, 2 9000 Ghent Belgium

Suggest Documents