Infection https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-017-1111-3
REVIEW
Advances in serological, imaging techniques and molecular diagnosis of Toxoplasma gondii infection Ali Rostami1 · Panagiotis Karanis2 · Shirzad Fallahi3,4 Received: 23 June 2017 / Accepted: 22 December 2017 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018
Abstract Background Toxoplasmosis is worldwide distributed zoonotic infection disease with medical importance in immunocompromised patients, pregnant women and congenitally infected newborns. Having basic information on the traditional and new developed methods is essential for general physicians and infectious disease specialists for choosing a suitable diagnostic approach for rapid and accurate diagnosis of the disease and, consequently, timely and effective treatment. Methods We conducted English literature searches in PubMed from 1989 to 2016 using relevant keywords and summarized the recent advances in diagnosis of toxoplasmosis. Results Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was most used method in past century. Recently advanced ELISAbased methods including chemiluminescence assays (CLIA), enzyme-linked fluorescence assay (ELFA), immunochromatographic test (ICT), serum IgG avidity test and immunosorbent agglutination assays (ISAGA) have shown high sensitivity and specificity. Recent studies using recombinant or chimeric antigens and multiepitope peptides method demonstrated very promising results to development of new strategies capable of discriminating recently acquired infections from chronic infection. Real-time PCR and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) are two recently developed PCR-based methods with high sensitivity and specificity and could be useful to early diagnosis of infection. Computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, nuclear imaging and ultrasonography could be useful, although their results might be not specific alone. Conclusion This review provides a summary of recent developed methods and also attempts to improve their sensitivity for diagnosis of toxoplasmosis. Serology, molecular and imaging technologies each has their own advantages and limitations which can certainly achieve definitive diagnosis of toxoplasmosis by combining these diagnostic techniques. Keywords Advances · Diagnosis · Toxoplasma gondii infection · Toxoplasmosis
Introduction
* Shirzad Fallahi
[email protected];
[email protected] 1
Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
2
Qinghai Academy of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, Qinghai University, Xining, China
3
Razi Herbal Medicines Research Center, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran
4
Department of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, School of Medicine, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran
Infection with the protozoan parasite Toxoplasma gondii has a worldwide distribution. Humans as well as virtually all warm-blooded animals, including mammals and birds, can be infected by this obligate intracellular parasite [1–3]. The main sources of infection are undercooked meat, unwashed vegetables and contaminated soils [1, 4]. Primary infection with T. gondii in hosts with healthy immune system usually appears as mild flu-like symptoms whereas in patients with a weakened or impaired immune system can cause life-threatening infections. In addition, transplacental transmission of T. gondii during pregnancy may cause serious problems that may lead to abortion, stillbirth, or neonatal abnormalities [5–9]. Also recently, toxoplasmosis is known as a risk factor for neurological and psychiatric disorders [10]. Accordingly, the diagnosis of toxoplasmosis is most critical in four groups
13
Vol.:(0123456789)
of individuals; immunocompromised patients such as HIVinfected or organ-transplanted patients, pregnant women who acquire the infection during pregnancy, congenitally infected fetuses and newborns, and those with retinochoroiditis [1, 11]. General physicians (GPs), as well as infectious disease specialists (IDSs) should not ignore the risks of toxoplasmosis in health care settings. They may encounter a number of toxoplasmosis issues, including clinical manifestation, accurate diagnosis and effective treatment. Clinical manifestations of T. gondii infection are non-specific and unreliable; therefore, diagnosis of toxoplasmosis is traditionally based on laboratory tests, particularly bioassay and serological methods. Variation in sensitivity and specificity, being time-consuming and inability of these methods to differentiating parasite strains and also high sensitivity and specificity of molecular methods in the detection of T. gondii infection led to the widespread use of these techniques to detect and differentiate of various strains of T. gondii [12, 13]. Having basic information on the traditional and new developed methods for the detection of toxoplasmosis is essential for GPs and IDSs for choosing a suitable diagnostic approach for rapid and accurate diagnosis of the disease and, consequently, timely and effective treatment. This review described recent advances in serological and molecular diagnosis of toxoplasmosis as well as briefly reviewed imaging techniques to diagnosis of infection. In this regard, we conducted English literature searches in PubMed from 1989 to 2016 using the keywords Toxoplasma gondii, toxoplasmosis, serological, molecular, diagnosis, imaging techniques and summarize the advances in diagnosis of toxoplasmosis.
Recent advances in serological diagnosis Serological methods Immunological methods were the preferred and most common diagnostic method for diagnosis of toxoplasmosis in clinical laboratories in past century. These methods are based on recognition of T. gondii surface antigens by host T. gondii-specific immunoglobulins [1]. Different immunological methods often measure different antibodies (IgA, IgM, IgG, and IgE) that possess unique patterns of rise and fall with time after infection [1, 14]. During the past several years, many immunological testing methods, including Sabin Feldman dye test (SFDT), indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT), latex agglutination test (LAT), indirect hemagglutination test (IHA), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), modified agglutination test (MAT), western blotting (WB) and IgG avidity test were used for detection of T. gondii infection in different patients and these diagnostic methods have been
13
A. Rostami et al.
reviewed by previous publications [1, 13–15]. Although in two last decades, other immunological methods, including chemiluminescence assays (CLIA), enzyme-linked fluorescence assay (ELFA), immunochromatographic test (ICT), serum IgG avidity test and immunosorbent agglutination assays (ISAGA) have been developed to improve the ability of diagnosis of T. gondii infection [12, 15]. CLIA and ELFA are fully automated variations of the standard ELISA that have several advantages including reproducibility, cost effectiveness and fast and precise measurement of IgG and IgM antibody levels. Furthermore, CLIA is useful in measurement of the IgG avidity index even at low levels of Toxoplasma-specific IgG antibodies [16, 17]. ICT is a suitable method for field application because it has low cost, simple procedure and no requirements for skilled technicians. In ICT, a cellulose membrane is used as the carrier and a colloidal gold-labeled antigen or antibody is used as the tracer [18]. Recently, Wang et al. developed a rapid ICT strip for detection of excretory/secretory antigens (ESA) in acute infection of T. gondii as early as 2–4 days after infection [19]. In ISAGA, anti-human IgM antibodies are used for diagnosis of acute or congenital toxoplasmosis. Disadvantage for this method is requirement of large numbers of T. gondii tachyzoites. Although, this problem was resolved by replacing T. gondii tachyzoites with latex beads coated with soluble antigens [12, 20, 21]. The most of the above-mentioned serological methods used whole Toxoplasma lysate antigen (TLA) or native antigens from tachyzoites grown in mice and/or tissue culture. In DT, live tachyzoites are used that are severely hazardous. Soluble antigens are used in LAT and IHA. Formalinfixed and killed tachyzoites are used in MAT and IFA tests, respectively. The procedures for producing these antigens are very different between laboratories and also are associated with high costs and lengthy preparation and the possibility of staff infection [22]. In addition, the prominent limitations of these methods are their inability to estimate the accurate time of T. gondii infection and difficult in standardization of tests [15, 23]. A recently developed approach to improve the diagnosis of T. gondii infection and also discriminating between different phases of infection is to use recombinant antigens in place of the TLA.
Advances in serological methods based on recombinant antigen of T. gondii As mentioned above, although several methods are applied for diagnosis of toxoplasmosis but ELISA remains the most common method in clinical laboratories. Crude tachyzoite antigen and/or excreted–secreted antigen were the primary testing antigens in conventional indirect ELISAs in which showed satisfactory sensitivity and specificity. However, above-mentioned limitations for serological
Advances in serological, imaging techniques and molecular diagnosis of Toxoplasma gondii…
methods such as difficult to standardize, contamination with extra-parasitic materials and discrepancy in results there are also for ELISAs that used of these native antigens [14, 24]. Replacing of the TLA with recombinant antigens is an alternative approach of improving these tests. Use of more than one defined antigen, standardized purified antigens, standard preparation methods, simple standardization of method and ability of discriminating between the acute and chronic stages of T. gondii infection are the major advantages of recombinant antigens [14, 23]. In recent years, several recombinant antigens have been expressed in Escherichia coli or yeast by gene cloning and expression techniques, and their potential diagnostic value for detection of specific IgG and IgM antibodies against T. gondii parasite was assessed in different infected hosts. These antigens are including surface antigens SAG1 (P30), SAG2 (P22), SAG3 (P43), and P35 [23, 25–30]; dense granule antigens GRA1 (P24), GRA2 (P28), GRA4, GRA5, GRA6 (P32), and GRA7 (P29) [30–39]; microneme antigens MIC2, MIC3, MIC4, and MIC5 [12, 40, 41]; matrix antigens MAG1 [42]; and rhoptry antigens ROP1 (P66) and ROP2 (P54) [30, 43, 44]. The prominent advantage of these recombinant antigens is the identification of specific antibodies from acute or chronic phases and the discriminating between these two stages of T. gondii infection using single sample of serum [23]. In addition to conventional ELISA, the application of T. gondii recombinant antigens in other serological methods such as IgG avidity test, CLIA and ICT have demonstrated very promising results for detection of acute T. gondii infection [45–54]. It is demonstrated that combining of complementary recombinant antigens significantly improves the sensitivity and specificity of the tests when it is compared with single antigen [55–57]. It reported that mixture of GRA7, GRA8, ROP1 and SAG2A, GRA2, GRA4, ROP2, GRA8 and GRA7 recombinant antigens are potentially useful to detect IgM and IgG, respectively [55, 58]. Further combined recombinant antigens and their diagnostic characteristics are reviewed in recently published review articles [12, 23, 41]. Moreover in 2014, Drapała et al. [59] evaluated the utility of two mixtures of recombinant antigens (rROP1 + rSAG2 and rROP1 + rGRA6) in IgG avidity test. Their results have shown that these two mixtures have high sensitivity (100 and 95.4%, respectively) for detection of acute toxoplasmosis, suggesting that new IgG avidity test using the mixtures of recombinant antigens may be useful for the diagnosis of difficult-to-identify phases of toxoplasmosis. Variations in sensitivity and specificity and contamination with proteins of the organisms that are used for the production of recombinant antigens (e.g., Escherichia coli) are the major limitations of recombinant antigens [60]. Use
of chimeric and/or synthetic peptide antigens is alternative approach to resolve of these limitations.
Advances in serological methods based on chimeric antigens and multiepitope peptides of T. gondii A growing number of recently conducted studies have demonstrated the potential advantages of chimeric or synthetic peptide antigens for the serological diagnosis of T. gondii infection, such as simple standardization, high sensitivity, low contamination with proteins of the organisms, reducing the costs of production, and increasing the probability of discriminating different stage of toxoplasmosis [61–66]. These chimeric and/or synthetic peptide antigens are including various immunoreactive epitopes from different T. gondii antigens which have been properly selected. These immunoreactive epitopes are hydrophobic and generally are well exposed on the antigen surface. During the recent years, a variety of innovative tools including peptide microarray analysis by bioinformatic methods, epitope mapping, phage display of cDNA libraries and reactivity with monoclonal antibodies have been developed for the prediction of specific epitopes and their localization on T. gondii antigens [23, 60, 67–70]. Beghetto et al. [61] for first time evaluated the diagnostic utility of two chimeric antigens, EC2 (containing MIC1 and MIC2 antigenic regions) and EC3 (containing M2AP, GRA3 and GRA7 antigenic regions) for serological diagnosis of acute toxoplasmosis. Their results have shown that chimeric antigens significantly improved the ability of RecELISAs (IgM ELISAs with chimeric recombinant antigens) compared with standard assays, especially in the diagnosis of congenital toxoplasmosis. Holec-Gąsior et al. [64] have demonstrated that sensitivity of MIC1–MAG1 recombinant chimeric antigen for the serodiagnosis of human toxoplasmosis is comparable with the TLA (90.9 and 91.8%, respectively). In subsequent study, the same authors have found that the chimeric antigen from three antigenic regions MIC1–MAG1–SAG1 have yielded better results than the chimeric antigen containing only two fragments from the MIC1 and MAG1 proteins [65]. In 2012, Dai et al. developed a recombinant multiepitope fusion peptide (rMEP) that was composed of antigenic determinants from SAG1, SAG2, and SAG3 antigens. In this study, IgG and IgM ELISAs with this rMEP-based assay were performed on human sera and results have shown that rMEP has sensitivity as high as commercially available ELISA kits and also has a significant potential to distinguish between acute and chronic toxoplasmosis [62]. Ferra et al. [22] evaluated diagnostic utility of five chimeric antigens in compression with mixtures of three recombinant antigens. Their study demonstrated that chimeric antigens were generally more reactive than mixtures of recombinant antigens. In addition, they showed that
13
chimeric antigens composed of SAG2–GRA1–ROP1L are most sensitive to detection of toxoplasmosis. In subsequent study, the same team demonstrated that this chimeric antigens (SAG2–GRA1–ROP1L) has also high sensitivity and specificity in IgG CLIA [45]. In summarizing the information presented in this section, although nowadays the majority of serological tests and also commercial kits used of TLA, but due their inability to distinguish between acute and chronic toxoplasmosis and also other limitations, it is necessary to develop of new strategies for resolving of this problem. Use of that recombinant antigens and mixtures of recombinant antigens is a good alternative approach in the diagnosis and also discriminate different stages of T. gondii infection. In addition, more recent studies using chimeric antigens and multiepitope peptides demonstrated very promising results for development of new strategies capable of discriminating recently acquired infections from chronic infection.
Molecular techniques for the detection of T. gondii Despite the significant improvements in serological methods, there are still unresolvable limitations such as inability of these methods to confirm the presence of parasite in fetus and brain in congenital transmission and/or immunocompromised patients. Development of the molecular methods during the recent three decades induced a great revolution in the diagnosis of infectious diseases in general. To overcome the limitations of the serological tests, different molecular methods including PCR, nested PCR, real-time PCR and also loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) techniques have been developed to detect T. gondii DNA in biological samples (Table 1) [71–73].
PCR‑based techniques In PCR-based methods, a specific fragment of the genome can be amplified resulting in many millions of copies of the target DNA molecule. The first PCR technique for T. gondii detection was established by Burg and colleagues in which the 35-repeat B1 gene of T. gondii genome was amplified [74]. Following it, several multi-copy targeting genes including 18S rRNA-, P30-, B1-genes, 529-bp repeat fragment or the AF146527 element have been used for the detection of T. gondii in different biological samples [39, 73–79]. It has been reported that PCR with the 529-bp RE gene is 10–100 times more sensitive than the B1 gene [76, 77]. To diagnose congenital and ocular toxoplasmosis, the PCR has been successfully used with amniotic fluid, placental and brain tissues, aqueous humor and vitreous fluid. Moreover, whole blood, urine, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF),
13
A. Rostami et al.
bronchoalveolar lavage, pleural and peritoneal fluids have been effectively used to diagnose toxoplasmosis in immunocompromised patients. Nested PCR is used to increase the specificity of DNA amplification as well as to detect the pathogens that occur with very few amounts. In a study reported by Alonso et al., nested PCR was found to be a rapid, sensitive and effective molecular method in the early detection of toxoplasmosis in patients with HIV [80]. In another study, it was demonstrated that nested PCR has high sensitivity for detection of T. gondii oocysts in river, well and sea waters [81]. Mousavi et al. compared RE and B1 genes for diagnosis of toxoplasmosis in diabetic patients using the nested PCR assay. Their findings showed that in comparison with the RE gene, the B1 gene is able to detect more positive samples and can be utilized for the detection of toxoplasmosis [82]. Vitale et al. developed a high-sensitive nested PCR assay targeting a region between the 28S and 18S rDNA for the detection of toxoplasmosis in animal and food samples [83]. It has been shown that additional development nested PCR assay can be a valuable, accurate, and specific method for diagnosis of different types of toxoplasmosis [84, 85]. Martınez et al. developed a nested PCR–ELISA technique to detect low quantity of T. gondii DNA using PCR coupled to a colourimetric detection step, by hybridization with a polystyrene sphere-bound probe [86]. This study reported that nested PCR–ELISA–beads assay is a valuable tool for the detection of T. gondii DNA [86]. Multiplex PCR is another type of PCR methods to detect multiple pathogens using multiple primer sets that each one targets a particular pathogen. This method permits the simultaneous analysis of multiple targets in a single sample. Nowakowska et al. used the amniotic and cerebrospinal fluids samples from congenital toxoplasmosis cases to determine the parasite genotype by nested multiplex PCR. They reported a sensitivity of > 25 parasites/ml in amniotic and cerebral spinal fluids samples by multiplex-nested PCR [87]. Rahumatullah et al. developed a triplex PCR assay targeting the B1 gene, 529 repeat region and ITS1 region of T. gondii. According to their report, this assay was capable of detecting as little as 10 pg T. gondii DNA, 1 04 tachyzoites in spiked body fluids, and T. gondii DNA in the organ tissues of experimentally infected mice [88].
Real‑time PCR (RT‑PCR) RT-PCR-based methods are recently developed assays that made quantification of parasite burden possible and have a high degree of complex-specific diagnostic accuracy for diagnosis of pathogens in clinical samples. RT-PCR is the most sensitive molecular assay for the detection of pathogens, especially when target DNA is in low concentrations. Moreover, these assays are more rapid, sensitive
Not known
Difficult to setup
0.02–1 genome Not suitable for equivalent typing, expensive equipment are needed 0.1–1 genome False positive equivalent results, relative difficult primer designing, distinct partitions for each stage of test
~ 10 genome equivalent
Less sensitive, false positive results
Less sensitive, false positive results
90–100
85–100
75–100
90–100
90–100
80–100
NPV
100
85–100
98–100
95–100 10 fg of genomic DNA/1–10 tachyzoites/ml
85–100
100
Not known Not known Not known
100
95–100%
85–100%
Specificity PPV
1–50 fg of genomic DNA/10–103 tachyzoites/ml
Not known
2–5 tachyzoites DNA per PCR
100 genome equiva- 10–100 pg lent of genomic DNA/105–109 tachyzoites/ml 1–10 genome 5–200 fg of equivalent genomic DNA/103–105 tachyzoites/ml
Insensitive, isolation of parasite needed
Sensitivity
Results
Disadvantages
CSF cerebrospinal fluid, AF amniotic fluid, ASF ascitic fluid, BAF bronchoalveolar fluid, FT fetal tissues, SM skeletal muscle, CNS central nervous system, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value, Mn-PCR multiplex-nested PCR, MS microsatellite
LAMP
RT-PCR & Realtime PCR
Multiplex PCR
Mn-PCR-based sequencing
Nested PCR
Species detection, B1 gene, 529 bp RE, CSF, AF, ASF, blood, urine, BAF high resolution in 18S rDNA, ITS-1, typing SAG1, SAG2, BAG1, GRA1 B1 gene, 529 bp RE, Blood, urine, FT Species detection, 18S rDNA high resolution in typing, isolation of parasite may not be needed Blood, urine Species detection, SAG1, SAG2, high resolution in SAG3, BTUB, typing, isolation GRA6, c22-8, of parasite may c29-2, L358, PK1, not be needed Apico AF, CSF, FT, BF High resolution in SAG2, SAG3, typing, suitable GRA6, BTUB, for epidemiology MS markers, B1, studies RE, ITS1 B1 gene, 529 bp RE, Blood, FT, AF, CSF Highly sensitive in SAG1, BAG1 detection, isolation of parasite not needed Water, brain, heart, Highly sensitive, B1 gene, TgOWP, specific and rapid liver, spleen, SAG1, SAG2, in detection, isolakidney, blood, 529 bp RE, GRA1 tion of parasite not SM, CNS needed, easy to perform,
Advantages
Conventional PCR
Sample(s)
DNA target regions
Technique(s)
Table 1 Comparison of the molecular methods for the diagnosis of toxoplasmosis
Advances in serological, imaging techniques and molecular diagnosis of Toxoplasma gondii…
13
and reproducible than conventional PCR, and are useful in investigations such as the kinetics of infections and monitoring therapeutic response [89]. The main advantages of RT-PCR over conventional PCR are including no need to open the reaction tubes and, therefore, minimized risk of environmental contaminations of amplicons, reduction of false positive results, measuring of amplification products during the each cycle using probes or intercalating dyes and providing precious diagnosis as choice of specific treatments for patients harboring several pathogens [79, 89–91]. In the last decade, several studies applied RT-PCR for diagnosis of toxoplasmosis in various biological, environmental and food samples [79, 92–98]. The majority of these studies reported that RT-PCR is more sensitive method compared with other molecular and biological methods [79, 92–98]. Lin et al. developed a RT-PCR-based assay for the detection of T. gondii using specific primers and a fluorescence-labeled TaqMan probe targeting the B1 gene of T. gondii. The assay was capable of detecting as little as 0.05 T. gondii tachyzoites in a reaction. Using this assay, they were able to detect Toxoplasma infection in 10 sections (33%) of 30 paraffin-embedded fetal tissue sections [99]. In another study, Costal et al. developed a RT-PCR assay using fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) hybridization probes to detect and quantify T. gondii DNA in serum sample. Their results have demonstrated that the RT-PCR is a valuable method to identify and follow-up of Toxoplasma reactivation in immunocompromised patients [91]. In subsequent studies, it has been shown that sensitivity RT-PCR was improved about 10–100 fold when the 529-bp targeting was used instead to B1 [77, 79, 100]. In addition, it demonstrated that RT-PCR using the 529-bp target was found better than B1 gene for the diagnosis of congenital toxoplasmosis in both prenatal (81.3 versus 64.6%) and birth (36.0 versus 20.0%) periods [100]. The combination of a sequence-specific magnetic-capture method and RT-PCR has demonstrated very promising results for detection of T. gondii cysts and predilection-infected site in animal meat [94, 101].
Loop‑mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) LAMP is a one-step modified PCR method, with high sensitivity, specificity, efficiency and rapidity. This method amplifies DNA under isothermal conditions (60–65 °C) using a DNA polymerase (Bst) with strand settlement activity and 4–6 specific primers, which are able to recognize a total of 6–8 distinct regions within the target DNA [102–104].
13
A. Rostami et al.
Procedure steps of LAMP are shown in Fig. 1. The technical advantages of using LAMP instead of conventional PCR and RT-PCR include no need of highly sophisticated equipment, not expensive and time-consuming, no need for DNA extraction, and being more tolerant to PCR inhibitors such as blood, serum and food ingredients [104–109]. Although, sensitivity and amplification efficiency of LAMP are much higher than conventional PCR, but are slowly lower than RT-PCR [108, 110, 111]. In addition, due to primers binding to 6–8 distinct regions on the target DNA, the amplification specificity of LAMP is considered to be very high [106, 109, 112]. These attractive properties have motivated many research groups to use the LAMP for detecting various pathogens including T. gondii [39, 73, 78, 105, 113, 114]. Following widespread use of LAMP to identify the T. gondii, several targeting genes including 529-bp repetitive element, B1, 18S rRNA, SAG1, SAG2, GRA1 and oocyst wall protein (OWP) genes have been used for the detection of T. gondii in different biological and environmental samples [12, 73, 108, 110, 111, 113–116]. In a study on water samples and targeting the B1 and TgOWP genes, a sensitivity detection limit of 0.1 tachyzoites’ DNA was reported for both genes, suggesting the LAMP as a sensitive and specific tool for detection of T. gondii in water and other environmental samples [113]. Wang et al. reported that LAMP assay using SAG1 as target gene has a significant potential for early diagnosis of toxoplasmosis. In their study, LAMP was able to diagnose acute toxoplasmosis 2 days post-infection [110]. In another study, Lin et al. reported that LAMP assay using the SAG2 target was more sensitive than B1 and SAG1 genes for the diagnosis of active toxoplasmosis (87 versus 80 and 80%, respectively) [111]. The performance of LAMP and real-time PCR assays targeting a 529-bp repeated element of Toxoplasma genome was compared by Lin et al. The reported detection limits for LAMP and real-time PCR assays were 10 and 1 fg/μL of T. gondii DNA, respectively [111]. Kong et al. developed a LAMP assay targeting the RE gene to detect T. gondii DNA in blood samples of experimentally infected mice. They reported a detection limit as low as 0.6 fg of T. gondii DNA for the RE-LAMP assay. Moreover, the LAMP sensitivity was reported 100- and 1000-fold higher than that of the B1-LAMP and RE-nested PCR, respectively [117]. In 2013, Qu et al., using the conserved sequence of 18s rRNA, developed reverse transcription LAMP (RT-LAMP) method for the detection of T. gondii in meat with a detect limit of one tachyzoite in 1 g meat. Their results suggest that RT-LAMP technique provides a simple and reliable tool for inspecting
Advances in serological, imaging techniques and molecular diagnosis of Toxoplasma gondii…
Fig. 1 Procedure steps and different product diagnostic methods of LAMP technique
meats which are T. gondii-contaminated [114]. In general, all advantages of RT-PCR assay including high sensitivity and specificity along with simple procedure for easy flexibility to field situations can be seen in the LAMP assay. Summarizing the information presented in this section, it must be mentioned that use of the high-sensitive molecular methods based on PCR has made a significant improvement in clinical diagnosis of different type of toxoplasmosis. Results of recent studies indicated that LAMP and RT-PCR using AF and CSF are more sensitive and specific methods in congenital infection and immunocompromised patients, respectively, and could be used for early diagnosis of infection and also in follow-up after treatment. Moreover, Improvement of bioinformatics technologies gives an ability to recognize potential targeting genes that could be very crucial to improve the sensitivity and specificity of these methods and provide prospects for the design of new complimentary diagnostic approaches for toxoplasmosis.
Imaging techniques Imaging techniques are useful for diagnosis of cerebral and ocular toxoplasmosis. In cerebral toxoplasmosis (encephalitis), a variety of imaging techniques such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), nuclear imaging and ultrasonography (US) could be useful, although their results might be not specific. A CT scan of the brain is often used as an initial screening test and may show single or multiple nodular lesions. The administration of intravenous (IV) contrast material with either modality improves the diagnostic yield and accuracy [118]. In CT scan studies, rounded isodense or hypodense lesions with thin- and smooth-wall were observed following the IV administration of contrast medium and calcified lesions with dot-like or thick-wall were observed following medical treatment. When double-dose delayed scan is used, central filling lesions are shown and detection rate
13
is significantly improved. Delayed scan demonstrated more sensitive diagnostic features, as in several cases enhancing lesions were detected by delayed scan, whereas negative results were achieved in immediate CT scan [119]. In CNS toxoplasmosis, approximately 75% of lesions are multiple and basal ganglia are most prominent site to induce nodules. In the congenital toxoplasmosis, CT scans may demonstrate diffuse hydrocephalus and brain calcifications that are associated with multiple, irregular, nodular, cyst-like calcifications in the periventricular areas and the choroid plexus [120]. MRI is more suitable for the determination of the damage extent and improved the ability to distinguish between different CNS lesions [119]. The T1 and T2 MR spectroscopy patterns are useful to improve the ability for discrimination of different CNS lesions. On T1-weighted MRIs, the lesions are typically isointense or hypointense relative to brain tissue, whereas in T2-weighted MRIs, they are usually hyperintense, although they could sometimes be isointense to hypointense. Brightbill et al. reported that T2-weighted hyperintensity could be pathologically related with necrotizing encephalitis, whereas T2-weighted isointensity is linked with organizing abscesses. Moreover, they described change from hyperintensity to isointensity in T2-weighted MRI could be resulted from positive response to antibiotic treatment, a tool to evaluate the efficacy of medical therapy [121]. The differential diagnosis between CNS lymphoma and toxoplasmosis is an important issue among ADIS patients. In MR spectroscopy, lymphoma is characterized by increased lactate, lipid, choline peaks and decreased N-acetyl aspartate, creatine, and myoinositol signals, whereas in CNS toxoplasmosis only elevated lactate and lipid peaks are depicted. Moreover, lesions induced by toxoplasmosis have significantly greater values than lymphoma lesions. Moreover in recent years, nuclear imaging tools such as fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography (FDG-PET), thallous chloride (201Tl) and technetium-99 m ( 99mTc) sestamibi (MIBI) have shown promising features to distinguish CNS toxoplasmosis from CNS lymphoma in HIV-positive patients, although more prospective investigations are needed to confirm the ability of these imaging tools [122–125]. Prenatal US can be useful to detect brain abnormalities due to congenital toxoplasmosis [126]. In a comprehensive review [122], Khan states that “ultrasonographic findings in congenital toxoplasmosis included symmetrical ventriculomegaly, intracranial periventricular and hepatic/splenic
13
A. Rostami et al.
densities, focal destruction of cerebral tissue that is related with enlargement of the neighboring cistern or ventricle, ocular calcification, microphthalmia, metaphyseal bands, irregularity of the metaphyseal border of the growth plate, fetal ascites, and increased placental thickness”. Postnatal US can be used to monitor ventricular size in infants up to 18 months of age. In adult patients, abdominal US can reveal hepatosplenomegaly and abdominal lymphadenopathy due to toxoplasmosis [126–128]. The ocular toxoplasmosis can be diagnosed by clinical findings such as visual acuity, intraocular pressure, biomicroscopy, and indirect ophthalmoscopy [129]. Although imaging techniques such as fundus autofluorescence (FAF), confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (CSLO), optical coherent tomography (OCT), fluorescent angiography (FA), ultrasound, and indocyanine green angiography (ICG) may be useful for its diagnosis and management of complications that include macular edema, retinal detachments, retinal neovascularization, vascular occlusion, optic nerve atrophy, vitreoretinal lesions, glaucoma and cataracts [129].
Conclusion Early and accurate diagnosis of T. gondii infection is critical, especially in congenital transmission and immunocompromised patients. The choice of the appropriate diagnostic method is essential for this propose. In this review, we provide a summary of recent developed methods and also attempts to improve their sensitivity for diagnosis of toxoplasmosis. Serology, molecular and imaging technologies each has their own advantages and limitations which can certainly achieve accurate and effective results for diagnosis of toxoplasmosis by combining these diagnostic techniques. For this purpose, we suggest IgG/IgM ELISA in combination with RT-PCR/LAMP on AF and prenatal US for detection of acute infection in pregnant women and also to start preventive measures of congenital transmission. Serological finding (ELISA using TLA, recombinant or chimeric antigens) is gold standard in newborns, although RT-PCR/ LAMP on cord blood or whole blood can be useful for definitive diagnosis. Moreover, combining of ELISA (using TLA, recombinant or chimeric antigens), RT-PCR/LAMP on CSF and imaging findings by MRI or CT could result in definitive diagnosis in immunocompromised patients (Fig. 2).
Advances in serological, imaging techniques and molecular diagnosis of Toxoplasma gondii…
Fig. 2 An algorithm for tests and test combinations for definitive diagnosis of toxoplasmosis in suspected individuals
Compliance with ethical standards Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
8. 9.
References 1. Robert-Gangneux F, Dardé M-L. Epidemiology of and diagnostic strategies for toxoplasmosis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2012;25:264–96. 2. Shiadeh MN, Niyyati M, Fallahi S, Rostami A. Human parasitic protozoan infection to infertility: a systematic review. Parasitol Res. 2016;115:469–77. 3. Rostami A, Riahi SM, Fakhri Y, Saber V, Hanifehpour H, Valizadeh S, Gholizadeh M, Pouya RH, Gamble HR. The global seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii among wild boars: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Vet Parasitol. 2017;244:12–20. 4. Siyadatpanah A, Tabatabaei F, Zeydi AE, Spotin A, FallahOmrani V, Assadi M, Moradi S, Rostami A, Memari F, Hajialiani F. Parasitic contamination of raw vegetables in Amol, North of Iran. Arch Clin Infect Dis. 2013;8:e15983. 5. Shiadeh MN, Rostami A, Pearce B, Gholipourmalekabadi M, Newport D, Danesh M, Mehravar S, Seyyedtabaei S. The correlation between Toxoplasma gondii infection and prenatal depression in pregnant women. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;35:1829–35. 6. Rostami A, Keshavarz H, Shojaee S, Mohebali M, Meamar AR. Frequency of Toxoplasma gondii in HIV positive patients from west of Iran by ELISA and PCR. Iran J Parasitol. 2014;9:474. 7. Rostami A, Seyyedtabaei S, Aghamolaie S, Behniafar H, Lasjerdi Z, Abdolrasouli A, Mehravar S, Alvarado-esquivel C. Seroprevalence and risk factors associated with Toxoplasma
10.
11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16.
17.
18.
gondii infection among rural communities in northern IRAN. Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo. 2016;58:70. Shiadeh MN, Moghadam ZB, Adam I, Saber V, Bagheri M, Rostami A. Human infectious diseases and risk of preeclampsia: an updated review of the literature. Infection. 2017;45:589–600. Fallahi S, Rostami A, Shiadeh MN, Behniafar H, Paktinat S. A literature review on maternal–fetal and reproductive disorders of Toxoplasma gondii infection. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2017;. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2017.12.003. Fallahi S, Rostami A, Birjandi M, Zebardast N, Kheirandish F, Spotin A. Parkinson’s disease and Toxoplasma gondii infection: sero-molecular assess the possible link among patients. Acta Trop. 2017;173:97–101. Pomares C, Montoya JG. Laboratory diagnosis of congenital toxoplasmosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54:2448–54. Liu Q, Wang Z-D, Huang S-Y, Zhu X-Q. Diagnosis of toxoplasmosis and typing of Toxoplasma gondii. Parasites Vectors. 2015;8:1. Montoya JG. Laboratory diagnosis of Toxoplasma gondii infection and toxoplasmosis. J Infect Dis. 2002;185:S73–82. Zhang K, Lin G, Han Y, Li J. Serological diagnosis of toxoplasmosis and standardization. Clin Chim Acta. 2016;461:83–9. Remington JS, Thulliez P, Montoya JG. Recent developments for diagnosis of toxoplasmosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:941–5. Petersen E, Borobio MV, Guy E, Liesenfeld O, Meroni V, Naessens A, Spranzi E, Thulliez P. European multicenter study of the LIAISON automated diagnostic system for determination of Toxoplasma gondii-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM and the IgG avidity index. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:1570–4. Gharavi M, Oormazdi H, Roointan E. A comparative study on sensitivity and specificity of conventional and unconventional IgG and IgM assays for diagnosis of toxoplasmosis. Iran J Public Health. 2008;37:42–5. Peng D, Hu S, Hua Y, Xiao Y, Li Z, Wang X, Bi D. Comparison of a new gold-immunochromatographic assay for the detection
13
19.
20.
21. 22.
23. 24.
25.
26.
27.
28. 29. 30.
31.
32.
33. 34.
A. Rostami et al. of antibodies against avian influenza virus with hemagglutination inhibition and agar gel immunodiffusion assays. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2007;117:17–25. Wang Y-H, Li X-R, Wang G-X, Yin H, Cai X-P, Fu B-Q, Zhang D-L. Development of an immunochromatographic strip for the rapid detection of Toxoplasma gondii circulating antigens. Parasitol Int. 2011;60:105–7. Desmonts G, Naot Y, Remington J. Immunoglobulin M-immunosorbent agglutination assay for diagnosis of infectious diseases: diagnosis of acute congenital and acquired Toxoplasma infections. J Clin Microbiol. 1981;14:486–91. Remington JS, Eimstad WM, Araujo FG. Detection of immunoglobulin M antibodies with antigen-tagged latex particles in an immunosorbent assay. J Clin Microbiol. 1983;17:939–41. Ferra B, Holec-Gąsior L, Kur J. Serodiagnosis of Toxoplasma gondii infection in farm animals (horses, swine, and sheep) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using chimeric antigens. Parasitol Int. 2015;64:288–94. Holec-Gąsior L. Toxoplasma gondii recombinant antigens as tools for serodiagnosis of human toxoplasmosis—the current status of studies. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2013;20(9):1343–51. Liesenfeld O, Press C, Montoya JG, Gill R, Isaac-Renton JL, Hedman K, Remington JS. False-positive results in immunoglobulin M (IgM) toxoplasma antibody tests and importance of confirmatory testing: the Platelia Toxo IgM test. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:174–8. Chen X-G, Gong Y, Lun Z-R, Fung M-C. High-level expression and purification of immunogenic recombinant SAG1 (P30) of Toxoplasma gondii in Escherichia coli. Protein Expr Purif. 2001;23:33–7. Kotresha D, Poonam D, Muhammad Hafiznur Y, Saadatnia G, Nurulhasanah O, Sabariah O, Tan S, Izzati Zahidah A, Rahmah N. Recombinant proteins from new constructs of SAG1 and GRA7 sequences and their usefulness to detect acute toxoplasmosis. Trop Biomed. 2012;29:129–37. Prince JB, Auer KL, Huskinson J, Parmley SF, Araujo FG, Remington JS. Cloning, expression, and cDNA sequence of surface antigen P22 from Toxoplasma gondii. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1990;43:97–106. Pa Myjak. Efficient production of the Toxoplasma gondii GRA6, p35 and SAG2 recombinant antigens and their applications in the serodiagnosis of toxoplasmosis. Acta Parasitol. 2005;50:249–54. Khanaliha K, Motazedian M, Sarkari B, Bandehpour M, Sharifnia Z, Kazemi B. Expression and purification of P43 Toxoplasma gondii surface antigen. Iran J Parasitol. 2012;7:48–53. Ferra B, Holec-Gąsior L, Kur J. A new Toxoplasma gondii chimeric antigen containing fragments of SAG2, GRA1, and ROP1 proteins—impact of immunodominant sequences size on its diagnostic usefulness. Parasitol Res. 2015;114:3291–9. Hiszczyńska-Sawicka E, Brillowska-Dąbrowska A, Dąbrowski S, Pietkiewicz H, Myjak P, Kur J. High yield expression and singlestep purification of Toxoplasma gondii SAG1, GRA1, and GRA7 antigens in Escherichia coli. Protein Expr Purif. 2003;27:150–7. Holec-Gąsior L, Kur J, Hiszczyńska-Sawicka E. GRA2 and ROP1 recombinant antigens as potential markers for detection of Toxoplasma gondii-specific immunoglobulin G in humans with acute toxoplasmosis. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2009;16:510–4. Ching XT, Lau YL, Fong MY, Nissapatorn V. Evaluation of Toxoplasma gondii-recombinant dense granular protein (GRA2) for serodiagnosis by western blot. Parasitol Res. 2013;112:1229–36. Mevelec M-N, Chardès T, Mercereau-Puijalon O, Bourguin I, Achbarou A, Dubremetz J-F, Bout D. Molecular cloning of GRA4, a Toxoplasma gondii dense granule protein, recognized by mucosal IgA antibodies. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1992;56:227–38.
13
35. Holec-Gąsior L, Kur J. Toxoplasma gondii: recombinant GRA5 antigen for detection of immunoglobulin G antibodies using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Exp Parasitol. 2010;124:272–8. 36. Lecordier L, Moleon-Borodowsky I, Dubremetz J-F, Tourvieille B, Mercier C, Deslée D, Capron A, Cesbron-Delauw M-F. Characterization of a dense granule antigen of Toxoplasma gondii (GRA6) associated to the network of the parasitophorous vacuole. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1995;70:85–94. 37. Redlich A, Müller WA. Serodiagnosis of acute toxoplasmosis using a recombinant form of the dense granule antigen GRA6 in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Parasitol Res. 1998;84:700–6. 38. Selseleh M, Keshavarz H, Mohebali M, Shojaee S, Selseleh M, Eshragian MR, Mansouri F, Modarressi MH. Production and evaluation of Toxoplasma gondii recombinant GRA7 for serodiagnosis of human infections. Korean J Parasitol. 2012;50:233–8. 39. Arab-Mazar Z, Fallahi S, Koochaki A, Haghighi A, Tabaei SJS. Immunodiagnosis and molecular validation of Toxoplasma gondii-recombinant dense granular (GRA) 7 protein for the detection of toxoplasmosis in patients with cancer. Microbiol Res. 2016;183:53–9. 40. Holec L, Gąsior A, Brillowska-Dąbrowska A, Kur J. Toxoplasma gondii: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using different fragments of recombinant microneme protein 1 (MIC1) for detection of immunoglobulin G antibodies. Exp Parasitol. 2008;119:1–6. 41. Kotresha D, Noordin R. Recombinant proteins in the diagnosis of toxoplasmosis. Apmis. 2010;118:529–42. 42. Holec L, Hiszczyńska-Sawicka E, Gąsior A, BrillowskaDąbrowska A, Kur J. Use of MAG1 recombinant antigen for diagnosis of Toxoplasma gondii infection in humans. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2007;14:220–5. 43. Van Gelder P, Bosman F, De Meuter F, Van Heuverswyn H, Hérion P. Serodiagnosis of toxoplasmosis by using a recombinant form of the 54-kilodalton rhoptry antigen expressed in Escherichia coli. J Clin Microbiol. 1993;31:9–15. 44. Martin V, Arcavi M, Santillan G, Amendoeira MRR, Neves EDS, Griemberg G, Guarnera E, Garberi JC, Angel SO. Detection of human Toxoplasma-specific immunoglobulins A, M, and G with a recombinant Toxoplasma gondii rop2 protein. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1998;5:627–31. 45. Holec-Gąsior L, Ferra B, Czechowska J, Serdiuk IE, Krzymiński K, Kur J. A novel chemiluminescent immunoassay for detection of Toxoplasma gondii IgG in human sera. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;85:422–5. 46. Pfrepper K-I, Enders G, Gohl M, Krczal D, Hlobil H, Wassenberg D, Soutschek E. Seroreactivity to and avidity for recombinant antigens in toxoplasmosis. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2005;12:977–82. 47. Beghetto E, Buffolano W, Spadoni A, Del Pezzo M, Di Cristina M, Minenkova O, Petersen E, Felici F, Gargano N. Use of an immunoglobulin G avidity assay based on recombinant antigens for diagnosis of primary Toxoplasma gondii infection during pregnancy. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:5414–8. 48. Marcolino P, Silva D, Leser P, Camargo M, Mineo J. Molecular markers in acute and chronic phases of human toxoplasmosis: determination of immunoglobulin G avidity by Western blotting. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2000;7:384–9. 49. Huang X, Xuan X, Hirata H, Yokoyama N, Xu L, Suzuki N, Igarashi I. Rapid immunochromatographic test using recombinant SAG2 for detection of antibodies against Toxoplasma gondii in cats. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:351–3. 50. Terkawi MA, Kameyama K, Rasul NH, Xuan X, Nishikawa Y. Development of an immunochromatographic assay based on dense granule protein 7 for serological detection of Toxoplasma gondii infection. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2013;20:596–601.
Advances in serological, imaging techniques and molecular diagnosis of Toxoplasma gondii… 51. Meek B, Diepersloot RJ, van Gool T, Speijer D, Peek R. IgM recognition of recombinant Toxoplasma gondii antigens by sera of acutely or latently infected humans. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2003;45:45–52. 52. Holec-Gasior L, Drapala D, Lautenbach D, Kuri J. Toxoplasma gondii: usefulness of ROP1 recombinant antigen in an immunoglobulin G avidity assay for diagnosis of acute toxoplasmosis in humans. Pol J Microbiol. 2010;59:307–10. 53. Elyasi H, Babaie J, Fricker-Hidalgo H, Brenier-Pinchart M-P, Zare M, Sadeghiani G, Assmar M, Pelloux H, Golkar M. Use of dense granule antigen GRA6 in an immunoglobulin G avidity test to exclude acute Toxoplasma gondii infection during pregnancy. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2010;17:1349–55. 54. Pietkiewicz H, Hiszczyńska-Sawicka E, Kur J, Petersen E, Nielsen H, Paul M, Stankiewicz M, Myjak P. Usefulness of Toxoplasma gondii recombinant antigens (GRA1, GRA7 and SAG1) in an immunoglobulin G avidity test for the serodiagnosis of toxoplasmosis. Parasitol Res. 2007;100:333–7. 55. Aubert D, Maine G, Villena I, Hunt J, Howard L, Sheu M, Brojanac S, Chovan L, Nowlan S, Pinon J. Recombinant antigens to detect Toxoplasma gondii-specific immunoglobulin G and immunoglobulin M in human sera by enzyme immunoassay. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:1144–50. 56. Pietkiewicz H, Hiszczyńska-Sawicka E, Kur J, Petersen E, Nielsen H, Stankiewicz M, Andrzejewska I, Myjak P. Usefulness of Toxoplasma gondii-specific recombinant antigens in serodiagnosis of human toxoplasmosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:1779–81. 57. Buffolano W, Beghetto E, Del Pezzo M, Spadoni A, Di Cristina M, Petersen E, Gargano N. Use of recombinant antigens for early postnatal diagnosis of congenital toxoplasmosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:5916–24. 58. Li S, Galvan G, Araujo FG, Suzuki Y, Remington JS, Parmley S. Serodiagnosis of recently acquired Toxoplasma gondii infection using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with a combination of recombinant antigens. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2000;7:781–7. 59. Drapała D, Holec-Gąsior L, Kur J, Ferra B, Hiszczyńska-Sawicka E, Lautenbach D. A new human IgG avidity test, using mixtures of recombinant antigens (rROP1, rSAG2, rGRA6), for the diagnosis of difficult-to-identify phases of toxoplasmosis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;79:342–6. 60. Maksimov P, Zerweck J, Maksimov A, Hotop A, Groß U, Pleyer U, Spekker K, Däubener W, Werdermann S, Niederstrasser O. Peptide microarray analysis of in silico-predicted epitopes for serological diagnosis of Toxoplasma gondii infection in humans. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2012;19:865–74. 61. Beghetto E, Spadoni A, Bruno L, Buffolano W, Gargano N. Chimeric antigens of Toxoplasma gondii: toward standardization of toxoplasmosis serodiagnosis using recombinant products. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:2133–40. 62. Dai J, Jiang M, Wang Y, Qu L, Gong R, Si J. Evaluation of a recombinant multiepitope peptide for serodiagnosis of Toxoplasma gondii infection. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2012;19:338–42. 63. Dai J-F, Jiang M, Qu L-L, Sun L, Wang Y-Y, Gong L-L, Gong R-J, Si J. Toxoplasma gondii: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay based on a recombinant multi-epitope peptide for distinguishing recent from past infection in human sera. Exp Parasitol. 2013;133:95–100. 64. Holec-Gąsior L, Ferra B, Drapała D, Lautenbach D, Kur J. A new MIC1-MAG1 recombinant chimeric antigen can be used instead of the Toxoplasma gondii lysate antigen in serodiagnosis of human toxoplasmosis. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2012;19:57–63.
65. Holec-Gąsior L, Ferra B, Drapała D. MIC1-MAG1-SAG1 chimeric protein, a most effective antigen for detection of human toxoplasmosis. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2012;19:1977–9. 66. Lau YL, Thiruvengadam G, Lee WW, Fong MY. Immunogenic characterization of the chimeric surface antigen 1 and 2 (SAG1/2) of Toxoplasma gondii expressed in the yeast Pichia pastoris. Parasitol Res. 2011;109:871–8. 67. Roggen EL. Recent developments with B-cell epitope identification for predictive studies. J Immunotoxicol. 2006;3:137–49. 68. Cardona N, de-la-Torre A, Siachoque H, Patarroyo MA, GomezMarin JE. Toxoplasma gondii: P30 peptides recognition pattern in human toxoplasmosis. Exp Parasitol. 2009;123:199–202. 69. Mévélec M, Mercereau-Puijalon O, Buzoni-Gatel D, Bourguin I, Chardès T, Dubremetz J, Bout D. Mapping of B epitopes in GRA4, a dense granule antigen of Toxoplasma gondii and protection studies using recombinant proteins administered by the oral route. Parasite Immunol. 1998;20:183–95. 70. Reineke U. Antibody epitope mapping using de novo generated synthetic peptide libraries. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;524:203–11. 71. Switaj K, Master A, Skrzypczak M, Zaborowski P. Recent trends in molecular diagnostics for Toxoplasma gondii infections. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005;11:170–6. 72. Gutierrez J, O’Donovan J, Williams E, Proctor A, Brady C, Marques P, Worrall S, Nally J, McElroy M, Bassett H. Detection and quantification of Toxoplasma gondii in ovine maternal and foetal tissues from experimentally infected pregnant ewes using real-time PCR. Vet Parasitol. 2010;172:8–15. 73. Fallahi S, Tabaei SJS, Pournia Y, Zebardast N, Kazemi B. Comparison of loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and nested-PCR assay targeting the RE and B1 gene for detection of Toxoplasma gondii in blood samples of children with leukaemia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;79:347–54. 74. Burg JL, Grover CM, Pouletty P, Boothroyd J. Direct and sensitive detection of a pathogenic protozoan, Toxoplasma gondii, by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol. 1989;27:1787–92. 75. Cazenave J, Cheyrou A, Blouin P, Johnson A, Begueret J. Use of polymerase chain reaction to detect Toxoplasma. J Clin Pathol. 1991;44:1037. 76. Homan W, Vercammen M, De Braekeleer J, Verschueren H. Identification of a 200- to 300-fold repetitive 529 bp DNA fragment in Toxoplasma gondii, and its use for diagnostic and quantitative PCR. Int J Parasitol. 2000;30:69–75. 77. Reischl U, Bretagne S, Krüger D, Ernault P, Costa J-M. Comparison of two DNA targets for the diagnosis of Toxoplasmosis by real-time PCR using fluorescence resonance energy transfer hybridization probes. BMC Infect Dis. 2003;3:1. 78. Fallahi S, Mazar ZA, Ghasemian M, Haghighi A. Challenging loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) technique for molecular detection of Toxoplasma gondii. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2015;8:366–72. 79. Calderaro A, Piccolo G, Gorrini C, Peruzzi S, Zerbini L, Bommezzadri S, Dettori G, Chezzi C. Comparison between two real-time PCR assays and a nested-PCR for the detection of Toxoplasma gondii. Acta Biomedica-Ateneo Parmense. 2006;77:75. 80. Alonso R, Martinez E, Laynez P, Miguélez M, Pinero J, Valladares B. Detection by nested-PCR of Toxoplasma gondii in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus. Medcina Clínica. 2002;118:294–6. 81. Kourenti C, Karanis P. Evaluation and applicability of a purification method coupled with nested PCR for the detection of Toxoplasma oocysts in water. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2006;43:475–81. 82. Mousavi M, Saravani R, Modrek MJ, Shahrakipour M, Sekandarpour S. Detection of Toxoplasma gondii in diabetic patients using the nested PCR assay via RE and B1 genes. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2016;9:e29493.
13
83. Vitale M, Galluzzo P, Currò V, Gozdzik K, Schillaci D, Di Macro Lo Presti V. A high sensitive nested PCR for Toxoplasma gondii detection in animal and food samples. J Microb Biochem Technol. 2013;5:39–41. 84. Eskandarian AA. Development of an efficient multiplex seminested PCR for convenient use in urine samples for diagnosis of toxoplasmosis. MedicalExpress. 2014;1:39–42. 85. Yamada H, Nishikawa A, Yamamoto T, Mizue Y, Yamada T, Morizane M, Tairaku S, Nishihira J. Prospective study of congenital toxoplasmosis screening with use of IgG avidity and multiplex nested PCR methods. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:2552–6. 86. Martinez E, Carmelo E, Alonso R, Ortega A, Pinero J, Del Castillo A, Valladares B. Development of a rapid polymerase chain reaction-ELISA assay using polystyrene beads for the detection of Toxoplasma gondii DNA. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2003;36:30–4. 87. Nowakowska D, Colón I, Remington JS, Grigg M, Golab E, Wilczynski J, Sibley LD. Genotyping of Toxoplasma gondii by multiplex PCR and peptide-based serological testing of samples from infants in Poland diagnosed with congenital toxoplasmosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:1382–9. 88. Rahumatullah A, Khoo BY, Noordin R. Triplex PCR using new primers for the detection of Toxoplasma gondii. Exp Parasitol. 2012;131:231–8. 89. Mackay IM. Real-time PCR in the microbiology laboratory. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004;10:190–212. 90. De Waal T. Advances in diagnosis of protozoan diseases. Vet Parasitol. 2012;189:65–74. 91. Costa J-M, Pautas C, Ernault P, Foulet F, Cordonnier C, Bretagne S. Real-time PCR for diagnosis and follow-up of Toxoplasma reactivation after allogeneic stem cell transplantation using fluorescence resonance energy transfer hybridization probes. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:2929–32. 92. Santos FF, Commodaro A, Nascimento HM, Furtado JM, Muccioli C, Rizzo LV, Belfort R Jr. Real-time PCR in the diagnosis of infectious posterior uveitis by toxoplasmosis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55:5284. 93. Costa JGL, Carneiro ACAV, Tavares AT, Andrade GMQ, Vasconcelos-Santos DV, Januário JN, Menezes-Souza D, Fujiwara RT, Vitor RWA. Real-time PCR as a prognostic tool for human congenital toxoplasmosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51:2766–8. 94. Juránková J, Opsteegh M, Neumayerová H, Kovařčík K, Frencová A, Baláž V, Volf J, Koudela B. Quantification of Toxoplasma gondii in tissue samples of experimentally infected goats by magnetic capture and real-time PCR. Vet Parasitol. 2013;193:95–9. 95. Wells B, Shaw H, Innocent G, Guido S, Hotchkiss E, Parigi M, Opsteegh M, Green J, Gillespie S, Innes EA. Molecular detection of Toxoplasma gondii in water samples from Scotland and a comparison between the 529 bp real-time PCR and ITS1 nested PCR. Water Res. 2015;87:175–81. 96. Juránková J, Basso W, Neumayerová H, Frencová A, Baláž V, Deplazes P, Koudela B. Predilection sites for Toxoplasma gondii in sheep tissues revealed by magnetic capture and realtime PCR detection. Food Microbiol. 2015;52:150–3. 97. Bastien P, Procop GW, Reischl U. Quantitative real-time PCR is not more sensitive than “conventional” PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:1897–900. 98. Kompalic-Cristo A, Frotta C, Suárez-Mutis M, Fernandes O, Britto C. Evaluation of a real-time PCR assay based on the repetitive B1 gene for the detection of Toxoplasma gondii in human peripheral blood. Parasitol Res. 2007;101:619–25. 99. Lin M-H, Chen T-C, Kuo T-T, Tseng C-C, Tseng C-P. Realtime PCR for quantitative detection of Toxoplasma gondii. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:4121–5.
13
A. Rostami et al. 100. Delhaes L, Yera H, Ache S, Tsatsaris V, Houfflin-Debarge V. Contribution of molecular diagnosis to congenital toxoplasmosis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013;76:244–7. 101. Juránková J, Basso W, Neumayerová H, Baláž V, Jánová E, Sidler X, Deplazes P, Koudela B. Brain is the predilection site of Toxoplasma gondii in experimentally inoculated pigs as revealed by magnetic capture and real-time PCR. Food Microbiol. 2014;38:167–70. 102. Abbasi I, King CH, Muchiri EM, Hamburger J. Detection of Schistosoma mansoni and Schistosoma haematobium DNA by loop-mediated isothermal amplification: identification of infected snails from early prepatency. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010;83:427–32. 103. Alhassan A, Thekisoe OM, Yokoyama N, Inoue N, Motloang MY, Mbati PA, Yin H, Katayama Y, Anzai T, Sugimoto C. Development of loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) method for diagnosis of equine piroplasmosis. Vet Parasitol. 2007;143:155–60. 104. Gallas-Lindemann C, Sotiriadou I, Mahmoodi MR, Karanis P. Detection of Toxoplasma gondii oocysts in different water resources by loop mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP). Acta Trop. 2013;125:231–6. 105. Abdul-Ghani R, Al-Mekhlafi AM, Karanis P. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) for malarial parasites of humans: would it come to clinical reality as a point-of-care test? Acta Trop. 2012;122:233–40. 106. Mori Y, Notomi T. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP): a rapid, accurate, and cost-effective diagnostic method for infectious diseases. J Infect Chemother. 2009;15:62–9. 107. Poon LL, Wong BW, Ma EH, Chan KH, Chow LM, Abeyewickreme W, Tangpukdee N, Yuen KY, Guan Y, Looareesuwan S. Sensitive and inexpensive molecular test for falciparum malaria: detecting Plasmodium falciparum DNA directly from heattreated blood by loop-mediated isothermal amplification. Clin Chem. 2006;52:303–6. 108. Zhang H, Thekisoe OM, Aboge GO, Kyan H, Yamagishi J, Inoue N, Nishikawa Y, Zakimi S, Xuan X. Toxoplasma gondii: sensitive and rapid detection of infection by loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) method. Exp Parasitol. 2009;122:47–50. 109. Zhang X, Lowe SB, Gooding JJ. Brief review of monitoring methods for loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP). Biosens Bioelectron. 2014;61:491–9. 110. Wang Y, Wang G, Zhang D, Yin H, Wang M. Detection of acute toxoplasmosis in pigs using loop-mediated isothermal amplification and quantitative PCR. Korean J Parasitol. 2013;51:573–7. 111. Lin Z, Zhang Y, Zhang H, Zhou Y, Cao J, Zhou J. Comparison of loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and real-time PCR method targeting a 529-bp repeat element for diagnosis of toxoplasmosis. Vet Parasitol. 2012;185:296–300. 112. Notomi T, Okayama H, Masubuchi H, Yonekawa T, Watanabe K, Amino N, Hase T. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:e63. 113. Sotiriadou I, Karanis P. Evaluation of loop-mediated isothermal amplification for detection of Toxoplasma gondii in water samples and comparative findings by polymerase chain reaction and immunofluorescence test (IFT). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008;62:357–65. 114. Qu D, Zhou H, Han J, Tao S, Zheng B, Chi N, Su C, Du A. Development of reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) as a diagnostic tool of Toxoplasma gondii in pork. Vet Parasitol. 2013;192:98–103. 115. Lau YL, Meganathan P, Sonaimuthu P, Thiruvengadam G, Nissapatorn V, Chen Y. Specific, sensitive, and rapid diagnosis of active toxoplasmosis by a loop-mediated isothermal
Advances in serological, imaging techniques and molecular diagnosis of Toxoplasma gondii…
116. 117.
118.
119. 120. 121.
122.
amplification method using blood samples from patients. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:3698–702. Hu X, Pan C-W, Li Y-F, Wang H, Tan F. Urine sample used for detection of Toxoplasma gondii infection by loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP). Folia Parasitol. 2012;59:21. Kong Q-M, Lu S-H, Tong Q-B, Lou D, Chen R, Zheng B, Kumagai T, Wen L-Y, Ohta N, Zhou X-N. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP): early detection of Toxoplasma gondii infection in mice. Parasites Vectors. 2012;5:1. Smith AB, Smirniotopoulos JG, Rushing EJ. Central nervous system infections associated with human immunodeficiency virus infection: radiologic–pathologic correlation 1. Radiographics. 2008;28:2033–58. Scheld MW, Whitley RJ, Marra CM. Infections of the central nervous system. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014. Masamed R, Meleis A, Lee E, Hathout G. Cerebral toxoplasmosis: case review and description of a new imaging sign. Clin Radiol. 2009;64:560–3. Brightbill T, Post MJD, Hensley GT, Ruiz A. MR of Toxoplasma encephalitis: signal characteristics on T2-weighted images and pathologic correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1996;20:417–22. Khan AN, Smirniotopoulos JG. Imaging in CNS toxoplasmosis. 2015. https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/344706-over view . Accessed 15 Nov 2017.
123. Hoffman JM, Waskin HA, Schifter T, Hanson MW, Gray L, Rosenfeld S, Coleman RE. FDG-PET in differentiating lymphoma from nonmalignant central nervous system lesions in patients with AIDS. J Nucl Med Off Publ Soc Nucl Med. 1993;34:567–75. 124. Villringer K, Jäger H, Dichgans M, Ziegler S, Poppinger J, Herz M, Kruschke C, Minoshima S, Pfister HW, Schwaiger M. Differential diagnosis of CNS lesions in AIDS patients by FDG-PET. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1995;19:532–6. 125. Kim HW, Won KS, Choi BW, Zeon SK. Cerebral toxoplasmosis in a patient with AIDS on F-18 FDG PET/CT. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;44:75–7. 126. D’Ercole C, Girard N, Boubli L, Potier A, Chagnon C, Raybaud C, Blanc B. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal cerebral abnormalities by ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1993;50:177–84. 127. Lago E, Baldisserotto M, Hoefel Filho J, Santiago D, Jungblut R. Agreement between ultrasonography and computed tomography in detecting intracranial calcifications in congenital toxoplasmosis. Clin Radiol. 2007;62:1004–11. 128. Abboud P, Harika G, Saniez D, Gabriel R, Bednarczyk L, Chemla C, Quereux C. Ultrasonic signs of fetal toxoplasmosis. Review of the literature. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 1994;24:733–8. 129. Lavinsky D, Romano A, Muccioli C, Belfort R Jr. Imaging in ocular toxoplasmosis. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2012;52:131–43.
13