Bayesian D-optimal designs for rank-order conjoint ...
Recommend Documents
in the design and a random respondent effect is used in the model because profile ratings from the same respondent are correlated. Optimal conjoint designs ...
rameters, then Eq.6 further simplifies to. ËErr(Zu|Zs) = Err(Zu|Zs(xs), Ëθ). (7). i.e. the posterior estimate of error is just the error calculated using the posterior ...
Mar 24, 2015 - We contrast this to the situation where patients are not complying to the .... blinded RCT with perfect compliance, meaning that the individuals in ...
*Frenkel Ter Hofstede is Assistant Professor of Marketing, Graduate. School of Industrial Administration, Carnegie Mellon University (e-mail:.
Sep 7, 1999 - trials. Generally in drug development, the first clinical trials are in human .... development programs by applying Bayesian thinking and adaptive ...
Nov 21, 2003 - themselves, but rather on the unknown parameters describing the heteroscedasticity of the model. There are three broad approaches to this ...
Jun 10, 2017 - A clinical trial is being planned to apply the AAA design. Keywords: Adaptive cohort division; Bayesian inference; Dose combination; Hierar-.
Nov 21, 2014 - Keywords: Bayesian isotonic regression transformation; doseâefficacy surface; doseâtoxicity surface; matrix ordering; plateau; post processing.
optimal design · Parameter estimation · Hierarchical model. B Antony M. Overstall ...... http://www.bode2015.wordpress.com). A.M. Overstall was supported.
Abstract. In a dose response study, there are frequently multiple goals and not all planned observations are realized at the end of the study. Sub- jects drop out ...
Aug 1, 2013 - Journal of Statistical Software .... Spiegelhalter, Thomas, and Best 2009). .... philosophy is to dose at the current 'best' estimate of the dose ...
minimally supported Bayesian D-optimal designs are obtained. A general procedure ...... the experiment, an efficient design is called for. For the birds, previous.
HOLGER DETTE, LINDA M. HAINES AND LORENS A. IMHOF. In particular Bayesian optimality criteria are based on criteria in classical design theory and many ...
account for potentially missing observations in a quantal dose response study ... goals are to construct optimal designs in a dose response study that incorpo-.
attributes associated with soap as, percentage of ... REVIEW OF LITERATURE ... A Research Paper-Preferences of Samples Towards Soap Attributes : Conjoint ...
Additive Predictive Model for Durian Pastillas Consumers. Total utility = Upackaging + Ushape + Ubrand + Uprice +. Ushel
Attributes used by young consumers when assessing a fashion product: a conjoint analysis approach. 40 ... ion product (denim jeans) were brand, style (fit/cut),.
The design probabilities play a fundamental role in standard frequentist theory. ... on a probability model and a prior distribution and is conditional on the.
Aug 2, 2015 - Keyword and Phrases: Design of experiment; Bayesian optimal design; ... without making any additional experiments, classical optimal design ...
Mar 15, 2017 - Adaptive designs for multi-armed clinical trials have become in- ... Keywords: Multi-armed bandit; Gittins index; response adaptive proce- dures ...
Adobe, the Adobe logo, PostScript, and the PostScript logo are either registered ... of Adobe Systems Incorporated in the United States, and/or other countries.
PLANCARDS Command Additional Features . . . 7. Chapter 4. Running a Conjoint Analysis 9. Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9. Specifying the Plan File and the ...
Conjoint analysis is a technique for estimating the value people place on the attributes or features which define produc
Bayesian D-optimal designs for rank-order conjoint ...
2. Rank-order multinomial logit model 3. Bayesian D-optimal designs for rank-order conjoint choice experiments 4. Performance of the Bayesian D-optimal designs 5. Improvement in the accuracy of the estimates and predictions
Example: Rank the following laptops in decreasing order of preference:
Screen:15.4 inch
Screen:17 inch
Screen:15.4 inch
Screen:17 inch
HD:80 GB
HD:60 GB
HD:120 GB
HD:80 GB
Battery:5h
Battery:6h
Battery:4h
Battery:6h
Bayesian D-optimal designs for rank-order conjoint choice experiments
MODA8 / 4
Introduction: Optimal design for rank-order conjoint choice experiments Goal: Performing a rank-order conjoint choice experiment in a statistically efficient way: with a small number of choice sets obtaining a maximum amount of information →Leads to precise estimates of the parameters with a minimum variance
⇓ Problem: A large number of possible candidate alternatives to include in a ranking experiment and how to group them into choice sets
⇓ Solution: Constructing D-optimal design for rank-order conjoint choice experiments
Bayesian D-optimal designs for rank-order conjoint choice experiments
MODA8 / 5
Introduction: Optimal design for rank-order conjoint choice experiments
Questions How to construct D-optimal designs for rank-order conjoint
choice experiments? ⇒ Development of an expression for the information matrix for rank-order conjoint choice experiments Do these designs outperform other benchmark designs? What is the improvement in estimation and prediction accuracy
if we include extra ranking steps in an experiment?
Bayesian D-optimal designs for rank-order conjoint choice experiments
MODA8 / 6
The rank-ordered multinomial logit model The rank-ordered multinomial logit model (MLM) = extension of the multinomial logit model (Begs et al., 1981) ,→ Ranking alternatives = sequential and conditional choice task
⇒ If ranking alternative i, i’ and i”, the probability of assigning rank 1 to alternative i in this choice set is: 0
Pik1
exp(xik β) P = 0 exp(x j∈{i,i0 ,i00 } jk β)
(1)
⇒ Probability of assigning rank 2 to alternative i’ is then: 0
Pi0 k2
exp(xi0 k β) =P 0 exp(x j∈{i0 ,i00 } jk β)
Bayesian D-optimal designs for rank-order conjoint choice experiments
(2)
MODA8 / 7
The rank-ordered multinomial logit model
⇒ The joint probability of ranking alternative i first, alternative i’ second and alternative i” third is: 0
0
exp(xi0 k β) exp(xik β) P · 0 0 exp(x β) exp(x 0 00 0 00 j∈{i,i ,i } j∈{i ,i } jk jk β)
Pii0 i00 k = P
(3)
⇒ This leads to the following log-likelihood function for one choice set and for one respondent: ln(L) = Yii0 i00 k ln(Pii0 i00 k ) + Yii00 i0 k ln(Pii00 i0 k ) + Yi0 ii00 k ln(Pi0 ii00 k ) + Yi0 i00 ik ln(Pi0 i00 ik ) + Yi00 ii0 k ln(Pi00 ii0 k ) + Yi00 i0 ik ln(Pi00 i0 ik )
Bayesian D-optimal designs for rank-order conjoint choice experiments
(4)
MODA8 / 8
Bayesian D-optimal design for the rank-ordered MLM Aim: maximize information coming from the experiment 7→ Bayesian D-optimality criterion: maximizes the expected determinant of the Fisher Information matrix over the prior distribution of the unknown parameters