Competitive balance in the UEFA Champions League group stage 20002014 Julio del Corral (University of Castilla-La Mancha, SPAIN)
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Discussion
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Discussion
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Discussion
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
Discussion
• Why UEFA Champions League is getting “boring”? COMPETITIVE BALANCE IS DECLINING ???
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
Discussion
• Competitive balance is a concept that could have several interpretations: Continuity of performance from season to season Closeness of a league competition • If the competitive balance in a league is low, fan interest in the weaker teams will fall and, eventually, fan interest in the stronger teams will also decline (Humpreys, 2002)
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
Discussion
• Most articles that analyze the closeness of a league competition have used some dispersion criteria of the results such as: Standard deviation of points (Koning, 2000) Standard deviation of win percentages (Zimbalist, 2002) Standard deviation ratio (Humphreys, 2002) Gini coefficient (Schmidt 2001) Hirschman-Herfindal index (Addesa, 2011) C5 concentration ratio (Naghshbandi et al., 2011) Special Concentration Ratio (Manasis et al., 2006) Relative entropy (Horowitz, 1997) VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
Discussion
• The first exception of using the results to calculate competitive balance was Paul et al. (2009) in a paper entitled: “Using betting market odds to measure the uncertainty of outcome in Major League Baseball”. • Subsequently, Bowman et al. (2012) developed several measures of competitive balance based on point spreads. • The objective of this paper is to further examine the idea of using betting odds to measure competitive balance in the group stage of the UEFA Champions League.
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
Discussion
• The first exception of using the results to calculate competitive balance was Paul et al. (2009) in a paper entitled: “Using betting market odds to measure the uncertainty of outcome in Major League Baseball”. • Subsequently, Bowman et al. (2012) developed several measures of competitive balance based on point spreads. • The objective of this paper is to further examine the idea of using betting odds to measure competitive balance in the group stage of the UEFA Champions League.
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
Discussion
• The first exception of using the results to calculate competitive balance was Paul et al. (2009) in a paper entitled: “Using betting market odds to measure the uncertainty of outcome in Major League Baseball”. • Subsequently, Bowman et al. (2012) developed several measures of competitive balance based on point spreads. • The objective of this paper is to further examine the idea of using betting odds to measure competitive balance in the group stage of the UEFA Champions League.
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
Discussion
Group stage
22 teams qualified in advance: 3-Spain, England, Germany9 2- Italy, Portugal, Fance6 1- Ukraine, Russia, Netherlands, Turkey, Belgium, Greece, Switzerland7
10 teams qualified from knockout qualifying rounds and a play-off round
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
Discussion
Teams are ordered by the UEFA coefficient (80% team past results in UEFA competitions+ 20% other teams past result from country).
Hence, 4 pots with 8 teams in each one.
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
Discussion
Group stage Group A 4 teams Group C 4 teams Group E 4 teams Group G 4 teams
Round of 16 Group A 2 teams Group C 2 teams Group E 2 teams Group G 2 teams
Group B 4 teams Group D 4 teams Group F 4 teams Group H 4 teams
Quarterfinals
Group B 2 teams Group D 2 teams 8 teams Group F 2 teams Group H 2 teams VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
METHODOLOGY
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
Discussion
Odds are converted into probabilities. Afterwords, it can be calculated the probability from betting odds for each possible number of points.
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
Discussion
.1 0
.02 .04 .06 .08
Probability
.12 .14 .16
Real Madrid density function 2013/2014
0
3
6
9 Points
12
15
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
18
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
Discussion
• Plotting the density functions of all teams in a group it is constructed a graph that enables the analysis of competitive balance. Closer density functions imply greater competitive balance within the group.
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
RESULTS
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
2000-2001
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Discussion
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Discussion
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Discussion
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Discussion
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Discussion
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Discussion
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Discussion
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Discussion
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Discussion
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
2013-2014
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Discussion
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Discussion
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Discussion
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Discussion
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Discussion
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Discussion
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Discussion
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Discussion
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Discussion
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
2000-2001
4
4
0
2013-2014
1
5
2
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Discussion
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
6
9 Points Second
12
15
Third
.12 .1 0
Fourth
3
6
First
UCL Competitive Balance 2005/2006
9 Points Second
12
15
Third
18 Fourth
6
First
9 Points Second
12
15
Third
.12 9 Points Second
12
.04
15
Third
18
Fourth
9 Points Second
12
15
Third
18 Fourth
.12
.12
.1 .04
.06
Probability
.08
.08 18
6
UCL Competitive Balance 2013/2014
.02 0
0 15
3 First
.02
.04
.06
Probability Third
0
Fourth
.1
.12 .1
Second
12
Fourth
.1 6
UCL Competitive Balance 2012/2013
.08 .06 .04
9 Points
Third
18
.02 3 First
.02
First
6
15
0 0
Fourth
0
3
Second
12
.06
Probability
18
UCL Competitive Balance 2011/2012
0
9 Points
.08
.1 .02 0 3
6
UCL Competitive Balance 2007/2008
.08 .04
.06
Probability 0 0
3 First
.12
.12 .1 .08 .06 .04
0
UCL Competitive Balance 2006/2007
.02
Probability
.04 .02
18
0
.02 0
0
3 First
Probability
.06
Probability
.08
.1 .04
.06
Probability
.08
.1 .08 .06 .04 .02
Probability
0
Discussion
UCL Competitive Balance 2002/2003
.12
UCL Competitive Balance 2001/2002
.12
UCL Competitive Balance 2000/2001
Results
0
3 First
6
9 Points Second
12 Third
15
18 Fourth
0
3 First
6
9 Points Second
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
12 Third
15
18 Fourth
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
Discussion
• What about the expectations on this season (2014-2015)?
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Discussion
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Discussion
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Discussion
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Discussion
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Discussion
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Discussion
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Discussion
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Discussion
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
2000-2001
4
4
0
2013-2014
1
5
2
2014-2015
2
3
3
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Discussion
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
.06 .04 0
.02
Probability
.08
.1
.12
UCL Competitive Balance 2013/2014
0
3
6
First
9 Points Second
12
15
Third
18 Fourth
.06 .04 .02 0
Probability
.08
.1
.12
UCL Competitive Balance 2014/2015
0
3 First
6
9 Points Second
12 Third
15
18 Fourth
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Discussion
DISCUSSION
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
Discussion
• There are groups with good competitive balance but there are others with very low competitive balance in the same season it has to be revised the UEFA coefficient construction. • The competitive balance is clearly decreasing (becoming boring??): Change the format of the competition as basketball or handball. Difficult the classification of “bad teams”. Increase revenue sharing, draft of non european players. Financial Fair Play. VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Discussion
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
Discussion
• There are groups with good competitive balance but there are others with very low competitive balance in the same season it has to be revised the UEFA coefficient construction. • The competitive balance is clearly decreasing (becoming boring??): Change the format of the competition as basketball or handball. Difficult the classification of “bad teams”. Increase revenue sharing
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
Discussion
• There are groups with good competitive balance but there are others with very low competitive balance in the same season it has to be revised the UEFA coefficient construction. • The competitive balance is clearly decreasing (becoming boring??): Change the format of the competition as basketball or handball. Difficult the classification of “bad teams”. Increase revenue sharing
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
Discussion
• There are groups with good competitive balance but there are others with very low competitive balance in the same season it has to be revised the UEFA coefficient construction. • The competitive balance is clearly decreasing (becoming boring??): Change the format of the competition as basketball or handball. Difficult the classification of “bad teams”. Increase revenue sharing
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
Discussion
• There are groups with good competitive balance but there are others with very low competitive balance in the same season it has to be revised the UEFA coefficient construction. • The competitive balance is clearly decreasing (becoming boring??): Change the format of the competition as basketball or handball. Difficult the classification of “bad teams”. Increase revenue sharing
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Introduction
UEFA CL
Methodology
Results
Discussion
• There are groups with good competitive balance but there are others with very low competitive balance in the same season it has to be revised the UEFA coefficient construction. • The competitive balance is clearly decreasing (becoming boring??): Change the format of the competition as basketball or handball. Difficult the classification of “bad teams”. Increase revenue sharing
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014
Thanks!!! E-mail:
[email protected] Twitter: @jdelcorraltm
VI European Conference on Sport Economics Antwerpen, September 2014