Jun 8, 2011 - The Internet Society. World IPv6 Launch: Access Networks. Who? â« ATT, Comcast, Free, Internode, KDDI, Ti
And there's no analogue of DNS Time-To-Live (TTL), so there's no way for repository to signal how long relying party sho
underlying filesystem (on which Unix variant?) will likely defeat any attempt to code around this. â· rsync is not well
view. (Server) virtualization is driving changes in the network and creating SDN applications. â« DC Orchestration. â« Service/Platform Virtualization. We're starting ...
Oct 24, 2011 ... M. Karir. Internet Draft. Merit Network Inc. Intended status: Informational Track. Ian
Foo. Expires: January 2012. Huawei Technologies. October ...
Jul 29, 2013 - and, of course, multi-homing. â. Particularly, it can also be used by the MPTCP community! âThe road to hell is paved with unused testbeds.â.
3 MAs deployed somewhere in Finland, Sweden and Canada in [RFC 6948]. - 14 MAs deployed across EU, more upcoming . ... S
Pass/fail determinations of Test Set results and test suite results. ⢠Raw results contained in leaf-list. ⢠ping.yang represents an extremely simple example;.
Mar 14, 2016 - The list of current Internet-. Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. Internet-Drafts
Mar 14, 2016 - [RFC1035], Mockapetris, P., "DOMAIN NAMES - IMPLEMENTATION AND. SPECIFICATION", November 1987. Author's A
Web apps currently can't do real DNS queries; with this ... Best practice HTTP semantics. ⢠Uses normal HTTP content .
5%. 10%. 15%. Google IPv6 Adoption shaded region represents the duration of the ... Quantification of failures helpful for upcoming IPv6-only networks.
RACK + TLP reduces recovery latency by 24% and may replace DupThresh approach. 5 ... Too high: 1ms is too high inside a
Dec 23, 2013 - in the candidate rewrite step (step 9) in the previous phase for the local browser. .... Experience Index for the slower laptop is 3.2 9 and for the.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-koodli-ipv6-in-mobile-networks-01 v6ops Working
Group ... Need for supporting overlapping private IPv4 address within and across
gateways, i.e., two ... already in use? – A percentage of phones in use may have
IPv6
10]. ⢠This includes sites which are hosting malicious scripts! ⢠Basic Web security .... from the JavaScript? (probably best). IETF 80. RTC-Web Security Issues. 12 ...
WebRTC. Structural and Sampling JavaScript Profiling in Google Chrome ... Are an approximation of what is happening in y
data sampled on a 1 ms interval in Chrome. â collect data for longer period of time. â ensure that your code is exer
WebRTC. Structural and Sampling JavaScript Profiling in Google Chrome ... Are an approximation of what is happening in y
(OSâiOS, Android) or browser (Chrome, Firefox). ⢠Developer Friendly: Sonus ... of their respective owners. To learn
WebRTC School Qualified Developer (WSQD™) program. Overview. The
WebRTC School™ is 'the' place to learn all about WebRTC, also known as Web ...
Considerations with WebRTC in Mobile Networks - IETF Datatracker
IETF 86-Oralando, March 2013. T. Reddy, J. Kaippallimalil, Ram Mohan. R and. R. Ejzak ... Dedicated bearers can be estab
IETF 86th
Considerations with WebRTC in Mobile Networks
draft-reddy-rtcweb-mobile-02 IETF 86-Oralando, March 2013
T. Reddy, J. Kaippallimalil, Ram Mohan. R and R. Ejzak 1
IETF 86th
Agenda Overview of in draft-reddy-rtcweb-mobile. Discuss the issues mentioned in draft Next Steps
2
2
IETF 86th
Introduction – Scope of this draft This draft looks at following aspects of webRTC from mobile networks perspective: – webRTC QoS in cellular networks – Mobility in Cellular networks
3
IETF 86th
Application / Service Layer UL Traffic Flow Aggregates UL-TFT UL-TFT → RB-ID RB-ID ↔S1-TEID
UE
eNodeB eNB Radio Bearer
• • • •
DL Traffic Flow Aggregates
DL-TFT DL-TFT → S5/S8-TEID S1-TEID ↔S5/S8-TEID
Serving GW S1 Bearer
S5/S8 Bearer
PDN GW 3gpp 23.401 Figure 4.7.2.2-1
Traffic Flow Templates (TFTs) used to sort packets into bearers on the uplink (in the UE) and downlink (in the PGW) TFT specifies flows based on IP header fields (IP 5-tuple) and DSCP Each APN has a default bearer Dedicated bearers can be established on demand, typically initiated by the PCRF via an application interface (Rx).
4
IETF 86th
Problems with Multiplexing 1. DSCP values might not be preserved across the remote peer's network, over the Internet, and into the local carrier's network. 2. OS limitations to set DSCP 3. TFT cannot currently distinguish between audio, video and data channels when multiplexed (if cannot use DSCP)
5
IETF 86th
Possible Solutions 1. Disable Multiplexing 2. Extend Packet Filter to include RTP SSRC 3. Extend Packet Filter to include RTP Payload type •
RTCP packets should not receive priority lower than corresponding RTP streams –
•
Consider compound RTCP packets
Data channels receive default for 5-tuple –
Only the browser can offer relative priority among data channels due to encryption of SCTP 6
IETF 86th
Proxy Mobile IPv6 – traffic offload 802.11 AP
Access Network SIPTO
Media MAG
Home Routed Traffic
Internet
802.11 AP
UE roams from the local Access network
LMA Macro Cell Access
Home Network
7
IETF 86th
SIPTO – Selected IP Traffic Offload • In 3GPP when traffic is offloaded at TOF • If UE roams out of the coverage of RNC then it cannot reach the remote peer. • Possible solutions to solve the problem Mobility using ICE (MICE)
![A Longitudinal View of Dual-stacked Websites ... - IETF Datatracker [PDF]](https://m.moam.info/img/260x300/a-longitudinal-view-of-dual-stacked-websites-ietf-_6487ae20098a9ebd728b4614.jpg)
![RTC-Web Security Considerations - IETF [PDF]](https://m.moam.info/img/260x300/rtc-web-security-considerations-ietf-pdf_647a6189098a9e79298b45c1.jpg)
